Saturday, 29 November 2014

(18) Islam and Christianity in Paradise

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive





(The Gihon is a river from the land of Cush, a mountain region in Iran and the Pishon is now a dry riverbed. All rivers ended in the Persian Gulf. Further, de story of Adam and Eve marks the transition from a hunter-gatherer to a farmer culture (Juris Zarins)).


Paradise is an illusion arisen from poor living conditions. Inbreeding and incest as the original faith of tribal Homo erectus contained so many sexual restrictions that an escape was found in the afterlife, in paradise. 

Genesis says nothing about earthly or parallel reincarnation. But we know that evolution of human religion is conditioned on the increasing difficulty of abstractions of eternal life: genetic immortality, reincarnation into the universe and finally into the parallel universe.





And therefore, the first belching of the caves and caverns of male sexuality concerns genetic immortality, as the pure transmission of the male genetic mirror to the offspring. That's the original Myth of Paradise. The second abstraction has been reincarnation into the (earthly) universe and the last concerns the parallel universe:








Genesis only speaks of the tree of life, but we know that on this tree the previously mentioned three abstractions must be projected. In fact the transformation to the projected
parallel universe of Christianity (pink) emerges from genetic immortality in Genesis (red).

Below you see the change from earthly to parallel reincarnation, in which Christianity again rejected the inbreeding and incest culture of paradise ├ánd earthly reincarnation, what was replaced in an orthogonal projection by reincarnation into the parallel universe combined with the totally new concept of the 'Fall of Man'A perpendicular projection from one plain on the other is not possible:







The orthogonal arrangement above means that Christianity introduced a radically different 
Paradise projection. They swapped endogamy for exogamy, earthly reincarnation for reincarnation into heaven and they changed the monotheism of the Tanah into polytheism of two gods: God and Jesus.




Not very well adapted Christian males might like to project their P as pure sexuality on Heaven of the parallel universe. But Christian Paradise projection is already desexualized and therefore pure sexual projections would disappear as anarchy, as vertical projections of P on the left side.




But because the inbreeding instinct has been nearly crossed out in exogamous Christianity there is little anarchy left. Hence, P sublimated a-sexually and takes about a horizontal position on the right side. In Christianity sexuality and esoteric religion have been disconnected and SM-dyad changed to Vanilla-dyad.

Exogamous cultures do not discriminate between humans, who are all considered subjects.
And with the recognition of two sexual roles, in two gods, God as male heterosexuality and Jesus as other sexual roles, Christianity basically accepted sexual roles as equivalent. 




And with at least two degrees of freedom a culture was built in orthogonal dimensions:
religion, law and the dialectical process between the sexes are in principle independent. 




Finally separation of powers and the separation of church and state developed: 




The third degree of freedom is not really necessary because basic morality and dialectic process are heavily confounded.




But Islamic culture acknowledges only one God: Allah. Islamic culture remained one-dimensional and therefore changed orthogonality in oblique relations, confounded and contaminated. 






We start the development of the Islamic Paradise projection from the endpoint of Christianity:




As a first try the Myth of Paradise can be seen as orthogonal to the Paradise projection
only when we limit ourselves to females. But we will correct that later.

Christianity was a movement within Judaism recognizing other sexual roles as subjects.
And just women who pursue genetic diversity had an interest in the parallel universe,
because there inbreeding and incest were meaningless. Inbreeding was only needed for reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. By faith in God or Allah in the parallel universe, women freed their bodies in heaven: 






                      .
                               

On the left side above we find the original Myth of Paradise as the nowadays unconscious
Paradise projection for Muslim males with male Allah as total projection of reincarnation
of all tribal heads in the (earthly) universe. And in the figure below we see their nowadays 
conscious Paradise projection in the parallel universe (blue):




Below the now unconscious Paradise projection of earthly reincarnation (redwhich was conscious at the time of the monotheistic Myth of Abraham, may be 10.000 years ago. Abraham accepted earthly reincarnation as well as parallel reincarnation, though not meant in the Tanah.






                                


And on the right side above we find the Paradise projection in heaven for Muslim females. What only is missing is the Paradise projection of Islamic culture as a whole, the horrible mixture between Muslim male and female Paradise projections (blue):




We already know that Islamic religion is heavily confounded with sexuality. 
Above we saw the male and female Paradise projections but not their common Paradise projection of Islamic culture as a whole: SM-dyad in the EGO:




Assumption 181: The actual sadistic god of Islamic culture is not Allah but are tribal gods from Paradise culture. In the beginning Allah was intended as an escape from male sadism just like Christianity. This worked through Jesus in exogamous cultures, but failed due to endogamy among Muslims. Allah, the women god from the SUPER EGO and tribal gods of the ID were contaminated and clashed on the level playing field of the EGO of Muslims.
What now is seen as Allah in the Koran and Sharia is a failed women god, which has been occupied by men. Hence Islam psychologically knows a male Allah who is dominant and a female Allah who describes the inner life of women. This all because in monotheism there can be only one God. Allah must be understood as a multiple personality in Islamic culture. This is the cause of the sexual imbalance between man and wife: SM-dyad.






Assumption 183: There is one Koran and there is one Islam, but there are two Allahs, for males and females. Both gods are called 'Allah' because Islam is monotheistic. But the female Allah actually developed from genetic diversity and the male Allah from the genetic monoculture of inbreeding and incest. In polytheism there would be two gods, with different names, a male and a female god, for example 'God' and 'Jesus'. In evolution the Christian god changed from genetic monoculture to genetic diversity as result of Vanilla-dyad.

In Christianity, where women never heard of the inbreeding culture of Paradise, there is no sexual stress in heaven. Christian males already do have their exogamous heaven on earth; they do not need 72 virgins in the afterlife (200.000 ya). And therefore the inbreeding culture and heaven in the parallel universe are uncorrelated and must be seen as orthogonal planes:


                         


But we know Islamic culture stems from Paradise culture in a straight line. Hence, female religion, female paradise and female Allah are also contaminated with this Paradise culture. For example Muslim males expect perpetual orgasm in the afterlife with 72 virgins. And Muslim females desperately want to escape the inbreeding culture by heaven. Therefore the Myth, or the ancient Paradise culture (ID)the Islamic paradise expectation as a whole (EGO) and female Paradise expectation of heaven (SUPER EGO) all are heavily correlated. 





Which means the Myth of Paradise (Ancient Paradise culture, the ID and the female expectation of the parallel universe (SUPER EGO), are not orthogonal but oblique planes. But first we show Islamic Paradise expectation as a whole on the horizontal plane to the right. It is Paradise expectation for Muslim males and females:








Above we see the contaminated EGO of Islam projected on the horizontal plane to the right. But we know this level playing field of SM-dyad lies in the midst. Below we find a better projection of Islamic Paradise for Muslim males (red left), Muslim females (pink right) and the contaminated Muslim culture in the midst.




And here is the best projection: Below you see oblique projections, which mean all types of religion are intertwined in bizarre ways. Perpendicular projections from one plain on the other are very well possible, hence they are correlated and meaningful connected:





The plane in the midst is the contaminated version of the Paradise projection of Islamic culture as a whole as written in the KoranIt is not as pure as in Christianity where man and wife see each other as subjects:




Islamic Paradise projection is a disastrous mix between two universes in the heads of Muslim males and females:








                               

cc-by-nc-sa






This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

Thursday, 20 November 2014

(17) Proving other faiths as objects

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive





Islamic culture is an endogamy where one can only marry within the group. Endogamies started with Homininae about seven million years ago. They mainly reproduced by inbreeding and incest. It was tribal endogamy.





In evolution ethnic endogamy developed by which the tribe was widened to an entire ethnicity. Plenty of reasons for this were available such as the prevention of autosomal recessive disorders.

The final stage was religious endogamy, by which inbreeding and incest were no longer necessary because people married within their own faith. All this is particularly true for women.

All these phases have in common that they applied unnatural selection on the population. Sensitive men and brave women were massacred so that an overrepresentation of sadistic men and masochistic women emerged at the poles. Even in religious endogamy women are slaughtered if they do not marry Muslims.

Islamic culture deliberately intervened in the construction of its population. But exogamous cultures like Christianity took the opposite direction. SM-dyad transformed into Vanilla-dyad. Hence assimilation of Muslims in Western society is nearly impossible. Centuries of mixing of populations are needed to outcross Muslim male's inbreeding instinct.






An endogamy can be maintained only through oppression of womenThat's because women naturally opt for genetic diversity. Men who opt for sexual monoculture suffer from mental disordersAnd so the battle between endogamy and exogamybetween husband and wife became the basis of human religion.

Sexual coercion can be enforced only within sadomasochism where women get unequal sexual roles. That is possible only if women are regarded as objects, without inner emotional lifein short, as animals.

The difference between exogamies and endogamies is the valuation of the emotional life of women. So Christianity is an exogamy in which women are considered to be subjects:

Christianity:  man = subject --------------------- woman = subject
Islam:             man = subject ----------- ---------- woman = object

When boys are taught women are objects like animals, women are supposed to have no feelings.

Objects do not have feelingsAnd therefore masochism of women is not processed in 
the unconscious of Muslim males. Generally they do not develop (sufficient) empathy for the female state of mind. In fact Muslim males may never feel empathy for masochism of women on pain of recognition of their subject.


                      


As long as Muslim males can maintain that women are objects they can exercise their sadistic lust undisturbed on their helpless bodies. This is called autistic or cultural psychopathy.

On the one hand their unbridled sadistic lust causes masochistic behavior in their victims, and on the other hand they may not recognize this masochism because women must stay objects.

And therefore Muslim males hate the masochistic behavior in their victims because it undermines their worldview. Objects are not allowed to have those feelings. They try to beat the emotion, the masochism out of their bodies. But the harder they try, the more visible the masochism. That makes them furious until the horrible masochism overpowers the Muslim fighter. At that moment masochism hatred changes into masochism fear. Sexual scales start to break SM-dyad into murder and sexual lust until this object shows no feelings any more.





And here we experience a tremendous difference between Islam and Christianity in how they treat their victims. Christians have learned to feel empathy and compassion
for screaming victims with wide open eyes. But Muslim warriors are killing them off immediately. This is Rosetta stone to Islam, the key to understanding Islam. Muslim fighters kill harder the harder the victim screams. Left or right they must create objects out of these subjects. They are proving other faiths as objects simply by killing them.

Assumption 185: The reason for Muslim males to kill other sexual roles, and especially other faiths is to degrade them to objects. Precisely because they unconsciously know that all living beings are subjects, they never stop killing them because that's the only way to prove that only Muslim males are subjects. 

Assumption 186: Muslims are killing off other faiths not exactly for sexual lust but because of their ideology, by which humanity has to be divided into subjects and objects literally. This originated in the inbreeding and incest culture of first Homininae. 

Assumption 170: Other sexual roles are homosexuals, women, children and animals. They are regarded as objects. We add to this category 'other faiths'.











cc-by-nc-sa




This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive





The Power of Islam

Islam is a machine with an engine that runs on a specific fuel. That machine is displayed in the cybernetic Sexual Model of Religion, the engine is the SM-dyad and the fuel is masochism hatred, ignited by masochism fear. A practical working model shows Islam born from Paradise culture.

The same machine is also applicable to Christianity, with a different engine called the Vanilla-dyad and without masochism hatred as fuel. That car runs on masochism love. 





The Sexual Model of Religion:



Paradise culture:




It is undeniable that Islam has certain power over its believers. A force that is released when there is specific agreement among Muslim males. 

We found three interlinked aspects:

1: We hypothesized a distinction between Islam and Christianity. Islam has created a much larger distance between the unconscious and the conscious of males, between 
sexuality and religionTherefore Islam is in our opinion a much stronger religion.





2:
 And we developed the psychology of 'Allahu Akbar' to show how sexual roles are divided in Islamic culture in order to authorize male sexuality by female moral standards:









3: Furthermore, Islam has relegated most sexual roles to the unconscious and male heterosexuality to the conscious. Therefore Muslim males develop a split sexual identity:





4: But basically we postulated SM-dyad for Islam and Vanilla-dyad for Christianity.





In conclusion it can be said that Islamic power originates from the unconscious of Muslim males. It looks like all they fear as weak and vulnerable is repressed to the unconscious because men lose their social position and are expelled when they thus be identified. For example, homosexuality is leading to social exclusion. 






This is not unusual in patriarchal cultures. However, there is a distinctive difference between patriarchal cultures based on exogamy (Christianity) or endogamy (Islam). In Christianity other sexual roles are treated respectfully and are seen as subjects. But endogamous cultures as Islam have to oppress the drive to genetic diversity of women, by which other roles are treated as objects. Hence Islam practices SM-dyad and Christianity Vanilla-dyad.





But there is a fundamental difference between Islam and Christianity and that's how they treat their victims. Christians have learned to feel empathy and compassion for the screaming victim with wide open eyes. But Muslim warriors are killing them off immediately. This is Rosetta stone to Islam, the key to understanding Islam.


Shared responsibility for Muslim females

Muslim males consciously think they are strong and masculine and heterosexual. And within the sexual domain they are eager to score on sadism of the principal axis:





In Islamic culture Muslim females are fully aware of the state of mind of Muslim males. Muslim females fulfill a dubious role in keeping SM-dyad. As already said they strike back hard in the SM-tetrad.





Muslim females therefore have great influence on the conservation of SM-dyad and are the psychologists of their husbands:





A man can treat a woman sadistic, sometimes several times in succession. But when that lifelong happens over a period of nine million years of evolution since Homininae, then there must be mutual consent over the SM-dyadThen Muslim women must have been selected on masochism in evolution. 

Would all Muslim women in the world withdraw from their cooperation to SM-dyad, that would be end exercise for Islamic culture. And that's why Muslim women are fully responsible for the crimes of their men against humanity. This SM-dyad is pleasing for women and therefore refers to a shared responsibility.








Controlling SM-dyad

How to define the real power giving Islam its unlikely aggression? Which brutality differs fundamentally from Christianity? It is because Islam and Christianity occupy the sadistic
and masochistic pole of monotheism. These are the poles of sadomasochism, the principal component of the space of gods in the archetype of God in the head of males; it is the power center of males.





It is our opinion that the motor of Islam is hatred, and combined with sadism it would be sadism hatred. But because the definition of hate works with mirror images, it must be masochism hate. We think that the power of Islam is sadism triggered by unprocessed masochism, unprocessed in the conscious. But it may be we are wrong, may be it is much more complicated.

First we note that Christianity much better succeeds in keeping blood lust and sexual desire as a critical mass in the focal caught of SM-dyad:

Assumption 66: Sadomasochism is a combination of murder and sexuality. It is unstable and easy flammable. Oppression of victims easily turns into murder, decomposing SM-dyad again into killer- and sexual instinct.

As long as one keeps bloodthirstiness and sexual desire as critical mass in focus, it goes well. But after losing control over the event, sadomasochism falls apart again in murder and sexual instinct. Then magic is lost and it explodes.




The key difference between Islamic culture and Christianity is that Islam cannot hold this critical mass together, time and time again is losing control, decomposing sadomasochism over and over again in murder and sexual desire. It is a vicious circle and perpetual process; it is the basic feature of Islamic culture.

Christianity succeeds much better in holding sadomasochism in synthesis. But more likely is that Islam intentionally collapses SM-dyad time and again in the interaction with Paradise culture. It is a willful interaction giving the Islamic killing machine animal power.






SM-dyad is the machine but masochism hate is the fuel. Why is that? 


The definition of hatred

According to psychology hatred stems from a psychological projection of one's own shadow-side on the victim. A shadow side the hater denies in himself, and thus discovers in the victim. Hate distorts reality. Usually the victim is someone just missing the bad qualities and is pure. That's why there is an inability to see reality and unconscious knowing that the hater himself has debt by blaming the victim. That is the beginning of hatred. 

This is our observation:

Our scenario is that if someone denies his dark side, he likely attaches to the opposite quality. When a person abhors masochism, then he likely glorifies sadism as a good feature. And by applying sadism to others, he generates masochistic behavior, exactly what he abhors and hates so much. So, the oppression of other sexual roles in Islamic culture would be a self-fulfilling prophecy to elicit masochism, to elicit hatred. 

Well, let's try masochism as the cause of hatred:

According to psychology hatred stems from a psychological projection of one's own shadow-side (masochism) on the victim. A shadow side the hater denies in himself (I am not a masochist), and thus discovers in the victim (she is a coward, a masochist). Hate distorts reality. Usually the victim is someone just missing the bad qualities and is pure (the brave woman who dares to refuse a forced marriage). That's why there is an inability to see reality (she is brave and I am the coward, killing a helpless woman) and unconscious knowing that the hater himself has debt by blaming the victim (I unwittingly know, I never learned processing masochism as a virtue). That is the beginning of hatred. 

As a first try it is not too bad but also not very convincing. We need more theory.


The Muslim male dilemma with masochism

It is our view that Muslim males are missing empathy for masochism, but only for the suffering of other sexual roles. Women are but objects without feelings, just like animals. But males definitely do feel masochism of heterosexual males.  And that's because they see each other as subjects with feelings. The fact that Muslim males are only blind for masochism of other sexual roles is similar to Christianity where animals sometimes are still perceived as objects that can be slaughtered brutally. 

With the distinction subject-object we add an additional degree of freedom to allow for a better explanation. The scenario is thus simplified by an intervening variable. Muslim males hate masochism in other sexual roles because empathy with them comes down to a blatant violation of the SM-dyad. Empathy with masochism of women would lead to the subject-subject relation of Vanilla dyad of Christianity which means the end of the Islamic culture. Because then there would be two gods, two equivalent sexual roles, two degrees of freedom for culture. And that means the separation of powers and the separation of mosque and state.

Now we earlier concluded that sadomasochism is only possible when one has the empathic ability to understand the suffering of the victim. 





But that is only true for the SM-dyad that is not too bandied decomposes in murder lust and sexual desire. That is true for the SM-dyad in BDSM, in porn from the Enlightenment.



Autistic psychopaths

Sadism becomes dangerous with autistic psychopaths, who are missing the subtle understanding of the suffering of masochism. Sadomasochism becomes a psychiatric phenomenon if one loses control, and is unable to relativize SM. Then sadist and masochist both are sucked in the vortex of paraphilia. 

Cultural psychopaths



In Islamic culture 'empathy' for other sexual roles is exempt from moral scrutiny. Cultural empathy for the own group of heterosexual males easily develops but degenerates to cultural psychopathy to homosexuals, women, children, animals and other faiths. Islam is a culture that feels no empathy for other sexual roles and therefore treats them immorally. 







Next we try a conditioned form of masochism, masochism under the condition of subject-object:

According to psychology hatred stems from a psychological projection of one's own shadow-side (discriminationother sexual roles are objects without feelings like 
masochismon the victim. A shadow side the hater denies in himself (I do not
discriminate because other sexual roles really are objects without feelings like 
masochism), and thus discovers in the victim (Indeed they are objects, what I can prove because I don't feel any masochism in them). Hate distorts reality. Usually the victim is someone just missing the bad qualities and is pure (the lovely woman appeals to his understanding of masochism and certainly must be a subject). That's why there is an inability to see reality (she is a subject and I am damned wrong) and unconscious knowing that the hater himself has debt by blaming the victim (I unwittingly know, she must be a subject). That is the beginning of hatred. 

Hatred is the unconscious knowing that other sexual roles indeed have feelings like masochism and therefore must be human subjects with equal rights. Precisely by screaming and dying a gruesome death they convince to be human beings. And therefore Muslim males hate masochism in their victims.

Muslim males have a sadistic drive to mistreat their victims. That is called autistic or cultural psychopathy. But this sexual lust is threatened by the manifestation of feelings of masochism. Hence, the only acceptable way to mistreat victims sadistically is to deny that they have masochistic feelings. As long as Muslims deny masochistic feelings they need not inhibit their sadistic drive.

Although we need the term 'masochism hate' to denote the outer appearances of the process, we now know that the distinction subject - object is really underlying masochism hate:

Finally try the distinction subject-object as the real cause of masochism hatred:

According to psychology hatred stems from a psychological projection of one's own shadow-side (discriminationother sexual roles are objectson the victim. A shadow side the hater denies in himself (I do not discriminate because other sexual roles really are objects), and thus discovers in the victim (They are objects because they I don't feel any masochism). Hate distorts reality. Usually the victim is someone just missing the bad qualities and is pure (the lovely woman certainly must be a subject). That's why there is an inability to see reality (she is a subject and I am damned wrong) and unconscious knowing that the hater himself has debt by blaming the victim (I unwittingly know, she must be a subject). That is the beginning of hatred. 

Now we found the right definition of masochism hatred.

Hatred is the unconscious knowing that other sexual roles indeed have feelings like masochism and therefore must be human subjects with equal rights. Precisely by screaming and dying a gruesome death they convince to be human beings. And therefore Muslim males hate masochism in their victims.


Masochism fear.




The more the victim screams with eyes wide open, the greater the risk that the unconscious truth penetrates that the victim must also be a subject with normal feelings. Masochism hate facilitating the lust to mistreat victims earlier turns into masochism fear when suffering becomes too great. By masochism fear the SM-dyad explodes into murder and sexual lust. Precisely before the truth penetrates the Muslim kills the screaming victim with eyes wide open. Then the victim is dead and definitely an object. 






Assumption 185: The reason for Muslim males to kill other sexual roles, and especially other faiths is to degrade them to objects. Precisely because they unconsciously know that all living beings are subjects, they never stop killing them because that's the only way to prove that only Muslim males are subjects. 

Assumption 186: Muslims are killing off other faiths not exactly for sexual lust but because of their ideology, by which humanity has to be divided into subjects and objects literally. This originated in the inbreeding and incest culture of first Homininae. 

Assumption 170: Other sexual roles are homosexuals, women, children and animals. They are regarded as objects. We add to this category 'other faiths'.

















cc-by-nc-sa





This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.