About Me

My photo
I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found.

Wednesday, 15 November 2017

(224) Blueprint of the Muslim religion

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive




The blueprint of human religion must be simple, since it is born out of animal religion. And the latter is nothing more than the pursuit of genetic immortality, where immortality refers to eternity:





We have no data to retrieve the evolution of human religion. But under strict conditions we may reconstruct our past. Evolutionary information has been stored deep inside our brain. At this moment it is impossible to read this information, but we might already build the headlines of human religion under strict conditions.


Reconstruction of religion in a logical order

In reconstructing human religion, steps must be taken in a logical order and  explained from former steps. On this blog there has been written a lot about deriving these successive religious stages from which next table results:







Inbreeding and outbreeding

We think the Muslim ideology comes down in a straight line from the first humanlike religion of the Homininae, what is no compliment. 










First bipedal Australopithecines were forced to inbreeding and incest, while Muslims later in the evolution never practiced systematic outbreeding with other peoples, what is the only way to dilute the inbreeding instinct of the Homininae:





Above you see the clash between the Koran, which wants Muslims to reincarnate into the parallel universe, and the God of Abraham, who accepted Abraham's earthly reincarnation into descendants of Isaac.


This is our integral view on the Muslim ideology:









Mind the contradictions. 

It is our opinion the schizophrenia of Islam lies in the unconscious of Muslim males. Most importantly, their forced monotheistic belief in Allah is contrary to their inherited instinct for earthly reincarnation:






Proof of belief in earthly reincarnation into descendants







In Christian Ethiopia they practiced no cousin marriages:

Earthly reincarnation in descendants is proven long ago in Christian Ethiopia where Christians were allowed to believe in earthly reincarnation, without risk of being killed by Islam.



Thus, in this prayer a new woman (in dieser jungen Frau) entered the male kin bonded lineage:





Earthly and parallel reincarnation

Assumption 248: Endogamous cultures practice inbreeding and incest as an instinct since the Homininae. First inbreeding was tied to genetic immortality, but later to earthly reincarnation, which combination is currently in force: the expectation of earthly reincarnation of tribal males reinforces inbreeding and incest.





[Primary religion = Earthly universe]
[Secondary religion = Parallel universe]

Assumption 143: Operant conditioning:
Human inbreeding developed as an operant response followed by a reinforcing stimulus of genetic immortality in the (earthly) universe.


Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring


Assumption 144: Secondary reinforcement: In primary religion, human inbreeding developed as an operant response followed by a reinforcing stimulus (of the expectation) of reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. Earthly reincarnation is the prevailing instinctive reward for inbreeding, because with genetic immortality the individual died.

Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe.




The tragedy of Islam is Muslims cannot get rid of their instinctive belief in earthly reincarnation. The schizophrenia of their culture lies in the incompatible interactions between forms of reincarnation:










Which gives an absurd descriptive formula of the Muslim religion, in which crazy 
interactions between the universes are fighting each other:





Compare this with Christianity:




Proceeding:

Assumption 145: tertiary reinforcement:
In secondary religion, human inbreeding developed as an operant response followed by a reinforcing stimulus (of the expectation) of reincarnation into the parallel universe. Though parallel reincarnation is the competitor of earthly reincarnation it is not the instinctive reward for inbreeding:

Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Tertiary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the parallel universe


Assumption 145
Inbreeding and reincarnation into the (earthly) universe form a profitable interaction, wherein the whole is more than the parts. After the invention of reincarnation, tribal inbreeding cannot exist any longer without earthly reincarnation. Parallel reincarnation was not better than earthly reincarnation because reincarnation into the parallel universe brought not about a longer eternal life than earthly reincarnation.

And with heavenly reincarnation tribal heads were no gods any longer (no reincarnation into their own tribe) and they would become completely dependent on the God of monotheism. And for a lot of other reasons a stalemate arose between earthly and heavenly reincarnation:

Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Later reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Later reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the parallel universe



Muslims unconsciously choose for earthly reincarnation:





Muslims don't know why they are so euphoric about the simple myth of Abraham, since the real reason for their outrageous joy is unconscious to them. The myth says that God accepted Abraham's earthly reincarnation into descendants of Isaac. Thus, God lets Muslims free to choose in what universe they want reincarnate. But much later it was Islam, which forced Muslims to reincarnate into the parallel universe of Allah, on pain of death ...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eid_al-Adha

Eid al-Adha (Arabicعيد الأضحى‎‎ ʿīd al-aḍḥā, [ʕiːd ælˈʔɑdˤħæː], "Festival of the Sacrifice"), also called the "Sacrifice Feast", is the second of two Muslim holidays celebrated worldwide each year, and considered the holier of the two. It honors the willingness of Ibrahim (Abraham) to sacrifice his son, as an act of submission to God's command. Before he sacrificed his son God intervened by sending his angel Jibra'il (Gabriel), who then put a sheep in his son's place. The meat from the sacrificed animal is divided into three parts: the family retains one third of the share; another third is given to relatives, friends and neighbors; and the remaining third is given to the poor and needy.







The evolution of the brain

Our model is built from successive evolutionary parts. We are interested in three parts of the brain, which are unconscious. The first stage concerns a small and now unconscious area deep in our brain (Australopithecus). The second layer comes from Homo erectus. This part is bigger and lays higher in the brain. Religious nerve cells may be connected with the first culture. These two cultures are definitely unconscious. The third layer is of Homo sapiens and reaches from 350 ka until now:




Paradise cultures




The oldest layer is from the Homininae (7 to 5 million years ago), named the first Paradise culture:





We stay close to sexuality and transform this culture parsimoniously into the first stage of human religion. The items below contain the stimulus-response system of the inbreeding ideology, which got eternal value and was upgraded to 'religion':





First bipedal Homininae lived in a forced inbreeding and incest culture.
Bipeds lost sight of each other since they mostly disappeared in straight lines behind the horizon. But quadrupeds like bonobos cannot run large distances and always return to the same fruit forests when fruit ripens. Therefore, they encounter familiar groups to exchange juvenile females on a regular basis. 

So, bipeds had a much smaller chance to exchange females. But Neanderthals, Aboriginals and other bipedal Australopithecines certainly found ways to exchange females what is the natural situation:


http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110601/full/news.2011.338.html

Teeth from ancient human ancestors suggest that females joined new social groups once they reached maturity.


A chemical analysis of australopithecine fossils ranging between roughly 1.8 million and 2.2 million years old from two South African caves finds that teeth thought to belong to females are more likely to have incorporated minerals from a distant region during formation than those from males.


"What that's telling us is that the females grew up somewhere else and they died in the caves," says Julia Lee-Thorp, an archaeological scientist at the University of Oxford, UK. 





Thus, the basic primate culture comes down to propagation of the male line by the exchange of females with other tribes, what is reasonably healthy. But involving daughters in the same lineage (cousin marriages) becomes a human anomaly if there are plenty other juvenile females available. This absurdity is perfected in the Muslim culture as a 'religion', an ideology to underline their group identity:






Homininae males saw themselves as tribal gods and strove to genetic immortality by inbreeding and incest. But they actually fell prey to phenotypic mortality, since they selected on corresponding external features for tribal identity:





This elicited autosomal recessive disorders, which caused fertility stress, besides primates are not that fertile in the first place. To make things worse, the male bonded lineage tried to reduce fertility stress by a kind of cousin marriages to increase production, which became part of their religion in the Homo erectus stage:





For males the deepest 'religious' wish was perpetual orgasm in this lifetime, what comes down to the most imaginary sexual differences between old and young between the sexes:









Later development to Homo sapiens stage:





They raised pedophilia to 'religion' too:

But with pedophilia something remarkable happened. It started with Australopithecines (7 Ma; 400cc), which were kind of bipedal apes without the pronounced secondary sexual characteristics of Homo sapiens (350 ka; 1400cc). These developed only with Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc).

And that means that pedophilia did not evolve in the first place as a sick interest in not yet burgeoned sexual traits of juveniles. It started 1) as a byproduct of the inbreeding culture and then 2) got religious meaning in relation to perpetual orgasm. This all happened before the onset of Homo erectus and before Homo Naledi.

So, sexual fixation on not yet developed sexual traits must be of a much later date. Sick pedophilia must be just the third phase after 1) cultural pedophilia by inbreeding and 2) religious pedophilia by perpetual orgasm. Thus human male pedophilia has its roots in religion:





Then, 'undeveloped sexual characteristics' is not the original driving force of pedophilia but is a later attached lust.







There is written a lot more on this site about this first human stage, but we must be parsimoniously. Anyway we can follow the paths by the arrows:






First there was cultural pedophilia, then culture evolved into religion and then pedophilia became the lower bound in the equation of perpetual orgasm. 


And these items are used in our Muslim model:





Notice 'pedophilia' is not unconscious in the Muslim mind. Hence, it is placed into the conscious part:





On the other hand, perpetual orgasm is an unconscious religious value in the Muslim mind. Better to say, they do not recognize the ultimate religious significance of perpetual orgasm, where they are just joking about the 72 virgins:





But we are seriously. We place perpetual orgasm into the unconscious, though this classification might be somewhat arbitrary.


The second layer comes from Homo erectus. 





This period is much shorter and ranges from 2 million to 350.000 years ago and is called the second Paradise culture:





This period gives the change from the basic animal religion named 'genetic immortality in descendants' to 'earthly reincarnation':






This part is bigger and lays higher in the brain. Religious nerve cells may be connected with the first culture. These two cultures are definitely unconscious.

The third layer is of Homo sapiens and reaches from 350 ka until now. 





It is known as 'reincarnation into the parallel universe'.





These different religious layers are very likely interconnected, so God can be everywhere in the brain





This third layer is also unconscious for the bigger part:








But we place the third Paradise culture (Islam) into the conscious:





Then, this is the blueprint of human religion confined to the Muslim ideology:





This ideology started 1400 years ago and is named 'Islam':






We place the contradictions in the male's mind:

Below, we show the conscious and unconscious of Islam. It is also the most powerful simplification of human religion. But remember, this is our subjective choice based on this blog:





The unconscious has a magical influence on the conscious by the subconscious as mediator:






If the Muslim culture ever falls apart, it likely disintegrates into the three constituting Paradise cultures:





And it is falling apart:





Just like Christianity, but in a completely different way:






This blueprint of the Muslim religion underpins our prediction of the future development of Islam. Blue is fading Sharia control on the youth. It is replaced by red, by criminality of the Homininae. Yellow is the regression of parents with children to cousin marriages of Homo erectus and older Muslims stick to Islam. But they still call themselves 'Muslims':



1: Tribal endogamy (Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc)


- The first group is the youth which is no longer indoctrinated by Islam but by the atrocities of Paradise culture (Isis) on the Internet. A lot of them become criminals and murderers (First Paradise culture).


2: Ethnic endogamy (Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc)


- The second group parents of about 40 is trying to enforce cousin marriages on their sons and daughters (Second Paradise culture).


3: Religious endogamy (Homo sapiens (350 ka; 1400cc)


- The third group is older than 50 and was raised in former Islam. (Third Paradise culture).


4: The fourth group of intellectual females

- The fourth group consist of young females who have chosen for Western society.

In the future a lot of Muslim males might regress to criminal gangs. But a group of educated females will flee into atheism.







Contemplation

We confined human religion to a male's problem in SM-dyad. We think Western culture cannot survive as Vanilla-dyad. This sugar morality has admirable aspects but is unsustainable in nature. Trying to bend sexual culture is wasting our time. Sadomasochism will accompany mankind to the farthest stars, not Vanilla-dyad. So, we better find some compromise.

American Democrats fanatically try to wipe out 'racism' and 'sexual inappropriateness'. But just they fell into the vortex of sexual lust of SM-dyad.  Actually, the lefties from Hollywood are the devil in disguise. Humanity can adhere a laudable culture but in the end their innate sexuality will have supreme authority. We better find some compromise.

Sadomasochism cannot sustain a whole culture for millions of years if not women contribute to the system. So, Muslim females must be addicted to their (masochistic) role too. Christian women feel the same but dare not to acknowledge. It has been said so many times on this site. I must sadly say Islamic ideology comes closer to human sexual identity than Christianity or Western culture in general. We simply must find a better modus vivendi than this forced Vanilla-dyad.

Must we become a kind of animals again? Of course not, but liberals (policor, PC) are on the wrong track. For example, in first instance marital rape is seen as a bad thing taken from Islamic culture. But be careful, if women alternatively take the lead in sex life, it becomes completely unnatural though, perfectly civilized. There must be made a compromise.

In the video below Kate Sinha gives a brilliant explanation of what we all think but only a woman is allowed to confirm. It is a psychoanalytical analysis of the Harvey Weinstein transition to SM-dyad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exlV4LwAk_8

KIRAC: Keeping It Real Art Critics (Kate Sinha & Stefan Ruitenbeek)






cc-by-nc-sa





This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.