Thursday, 25 June 2020

NUMBER ARCHIVE


Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Last update homepage: July 4, 2020.









FOR MH17: See http://mh17crystalball.blogspot.com/
FOR MH17: See www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com
FOR MH17: See at the bottom of this article.








GOOGLE TRANSLATES INTO YOUR 
OWN LANGUAGE, E.G. ARABIC:
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com








































































Assumption 555: The plausibility of an inbreeding instinct


1: The first bipedal Hominids from 14 to 7 million years ago were forced to inbreeding by the bipedal mutation, which made it difficult for them to get in touch with other groups. Sexual culture is controlled and sanctioned by 'religion' and therefore 'inbreeding and incest' became the primal bipedal primate religion.
2: Because this condition has lasted 14 million years, we assume that inbreeding has become a Sexual Instinct controlled and sanctioned by "religion". If that instinct is not diluted by mixing with outbred populations, it will be retained in the genes of the inbred population, AKA Arab and Asian Muslims.



3: Now, a religion exists for a few thousand years at the most, say a maximum of 5 thousand years. This means that the inbreeding culture of Muslims cannot be the same religion as that of the early bipedal primates. There is no cultural connection possible. And that is the reason to suppose an inbreeding instinct, which is permanently present in the genes of inbred populations and from which swells up every few thousand years a new inbreeding culture. 



4: So, inbreeding cultures come and go but they have nothing in common. Their only connection is the eruption of the inbreeding instinct, dating from the first Hominids:









 
              





Number Archive



INTRODUCTION ARTICLES:

GROUP PERMEABILITY IDENTIFIES RELIGIONS
(167) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 1

DEVELOPMENT AND DYNAMICS OF RELIGIOUS STAGES
(168) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 2

RELIGION AS CONTROL ON SEXUAL CULTURE
(169) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 3

GODS ARE SEXUAL ROLES
(170) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 4

POLYTHEISM, MONOTHEISM AND REPRESSIVE TOLERANCE
(171) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 5

SADOMASOCHISM, SM-DYAD AND VANILLA-DYAD
(172) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 6

'HONOR OF THE FAMILY' AND FERTILITY STRESS
(173) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 7


⚠️


(300) Q&A (Question-and-answer)
(282) How to prevent honor killings ๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ด
(293) Why Islam will never defeat honor killings (reincarnation)๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ด
(298) Omvolking รคr en sadomasochistic intrassling ๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ด [English:(294)]
(305) The cause of honor killings๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ด



(1) Foundations of Human Religion
(2) Human religion, the timelessness derivative of sexuality
(3) The Tragedy of God
(4) Human religion as operant conditioning
(5) Honor killings caused by inbreeding and incest  
(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales
(7) Honor killings in Islamic culture
(8) Honor killing Scenarios
(9) The Convergence Theory of Paradise
(13) The Evolution of Female Religion
(14) The Conquest of Endogamous Populations
(15) A new approach to Honor killings 
(15) Een nieuwe benadering van Eerwraak
(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam
(17) Proving other faiths as objects
(18) Islam and Christianity in Paradise
(19) The Battle of Allahs
(20) Islam, the Red Giant
(21) The Basic Dimension of Religion
(22) Antipodal Religions in Basic Dimension 
(23) Counter-cyclical cultures in Basic Dimension
(24) Crumbling Islam lost tribal identity
(25) Honor killings in short
(26) Religions identified by group permeability
(27) Thou shalt propagate in genetic diversity
(28) The Key to Human Religion (Part 1) [Mammals]
(29) The Key to Human Religion (Part 2) [Homininae]
(30) The Key to Human Religion (Part 3) [Homo erectus]
(31) The Key to Human Religion (part 4) [Homo sapiens]
(32) The Archetype of God
(33) Chrislam, God of Policor
(34) Freedom of Speech
(35) Religion and endogamy
(36) Non-sexual religion in Basic Dimension
(37) The Timelessness of Endogamy
(38) Killing Honor
(39) Killing Honor by fading Perpetual Orgasm
(40) Perpetual Orgasm, the Fourth God
(41) Pedophilia, crowbar in human religion
(42) The Split in Panini Religion
(43) The Incest Inbreeding Compensation Model
(44) The Evolution of Pedophilia
(45) Selective breeding with Homininae
(46) The Schengen Necrology of European Culture
(47) The Curse of Enlightenment
(48) Federica Mogherini's lustful submission to Chrislam ๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ด (Timon Dias)
(49) The Fatal Flaw in Islam
(50) The Cause of Chrislam
(51) Women's emancipation causes Chrislam
(52) Space-time, wormhole to God for primitive man
(53) Space-time for Hominids
(54) Roots of racism
(55) The time derivative of sexual culture
(56) Homo orgasmus
(57) Chrislamic orgasm ๐Ÿ”ด
(58) Homo naledi: Antedating Human Religion
(59) The Killer Hominid

List of assumptions by number:

(73) The Sexual Theory of Religion  (Part 1: 1-59)
(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)
(75) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 3: 120-400)
(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 400-600)

(77) Homo naledi from rebirth to reincarnation 
(78) Roaming led to bonobo religion
(79) Sexual crisis in Islam
(80) Why gay people must be sick
(81) The future of Islam
(82) Political correctness as sexual disorder
(87) The blessing of multiculturalism
(88) The Alpha Male of Dutch Parliament
(89) Marital rape
(90) Policor, the new religion
(91) Why Muslims kill homosexuals
Blogger Help Forum, Blogspot is adding extra lines with every update
(92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught
(93) Christianity lost SM-dyad
(94) Rape and murder distinguish between religions ๐Ÿ”ด
(95) Policor fears the white elephant
(96) Mitochondrial DNA males and females
(97) The Alpha male started inbreeding and incest
(98) Inheritance patterns
(99) Breaking sadomasochism
(100) The insatiable serial killer
(101) Femdomized Western culture
(102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom 
(103) Infanticide proves genetic immortality
(104) Genetic immortality and perpetual orgasm
(105) Western Europe, Muslim Paradise on Earth
(106) Concealed ovulation
(107) Homo naledi: The sum of its parts
(108) Homo naledi: The sticks and lianas theory๐Ÿ”ด
(109) Homo naledi and the Underworld 
(110) Homo naledi as inbreeding culture
(111) Homo naledi: Finding Rebirth Graveyards
(148) Paradise Myth will cause WWIII
(149) Overflow of the inbreeding instinct
(150) Amsterdam Post, 5 october 2012 (Van Frikschoten)
(151) The Muslim incrowd syndrome
(152) The Islamic thermometer
(153) Differential regression of the Muslim culture
(154) Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.)
(155) The Melania Trump effect
(156) Coefficient of Relationship (C.O.R.)
(157) The schism of policor
(158) Dynamics of religion
(159) Proof belief of earthly reincarnation into descendants
(160) Breakthrough in honor killings ๐Ÿ”ด⚠️
(161) Grandpa, please come into my womb 
(162) Muslim 'honor' signifies fertility stress
(163) The Muslim fertility obsession
(164) Ancestors are hybrid god projections
(165) Tragedy: The battle of gods from Adam and Eve
(166) Religious terror from the German Government
(167) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 1
(168) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 2
(169) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 3
(170) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 4
(173) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 7
(180) Homosexuality and fertility stress
(181) Intermittent reinforcement of religion
(182) The Swedish Act With Ass Up
(183) Islam looks like an autosomal recessive disorder
(184) The Muslim autosomal recessive disorder syndrome
(185) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 1
(186) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 2
(187) Yin and Yang in policor
(188) The race of anti-policor to salvation
(189) Policor, the decadent society
(190) Australopithecus interbred with Homo sapiens?
(191) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 3⚠️
(192) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 4
(193) Masochism love, hate and fear ๐Ÿ”ด
(194) The twist in the Muslim instinct













        


http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Iran,-father-murders-daughter-after-elopement.-
Activists-and-civil-society-in-revolt-50199.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/28/romina-ashrafi-outcry-in-iran-over-so-called-honour-killing-of-14-year-old-girl













'Teenage girl Romina Ashrafi from the northwestern city of Talesh had fallen in love with a man in his thirties and ran away after her father objected to a marriage. After returning home last week, her father beheaded her in her sleep, reportedly with a sickle. The father then reported himself to the police. Agents are said to have found the father with the bleeding murder weapon in his hand.'

Assumption 530
Muslim fathers must be informed about their reincarnation instinct long before puberty of their daughters. At the onset of puberty, it's too late and fathers are already becoming psychotic...

It's only been 10 years since the 4-year-old Romina sat on Dad's lap. And how proud he was of his little girl. Therefore, he is probably not a natural psychopath, although some Muslim males are cultural psychopaths by indoctrination. So, that begs the question how come the father changed into a psychotic? 

He became gloomy at the first development of Romina's secondary sexual characteristics. He had to find her a man in whose descendants he would like to reincarnate someday. Preferably a family member. And that's how honor killings come about. But this whole process is unconscious to Muslim males:


He did not flee, but went to the police with the sickle in his hand. As if part of his mind emphasized the correctness of his actions. Clear evidence that his unconscious made a different judgment than his conscious. Also the fact that he consciously was afraid to kill Romina while she was awake. His relationship with Romina prevented that. But when she slept his unconscious drive to kill the hybrid in her got the upper hand. Bastard descendants into which he would never reincarnate. 

Romina was a human being, a subject in his conscious, but just an object, an incubator for family semen in his unconscious. What we see is characteristic for honor killers, a stone-cold psychosis in which the perpetrator knows he is wrongbut feels he is right ...

This brings us to a serious warning that the odds on honor killing are greatest after the daughter has been away from home for longer time. Of course, here too the conflict worsens over time, but when the daughter returns home there is a greater chance that the father's uncontrolled psychosis will discharge directly on the daughter. 

Psychosis worsens differently without the counterbalance of the daughter as a subject in his conscious. It progresses in an uncontrolled way and overwhelms him when she gets home. The same process can led him to invite her home "to make it right again". This all means leaving the parental house must be forever. (Sadia Sheikh and Gรผlsรผm Selim were honor killed when they returned home for an attempt, a trap at reconciliation).

In every culture it is absurd for a 14-year-old girl to continue with a 34-year-old man. And in Islam this is completely impossible. Technically, what are the mistakes in this situation:

Firstly, as already said, a girl who flees from home must never come back, that's our main rule and Romina came back. 

Secondly, Romina was much too young and apparently not well informed about the risks she was taking. 

Thirdly, this all must be the endgame from a two-year escalating relationship. 

Fourthly, quite understandably the father pulled the emergency brake of Sexual Scales of Religion. Of course, our empathy does not mean sympathy, no way. But anger alone cannot solve honor killings.




The father must be held accountable for his actions, that's for sure. He must be severely punished. But if numerous fathers in the Muslim world display the same behavior without mutual contact, then it cannot be caused by culture alone, then this behavior must be caused by an underlying instinctive pattern of drives. Then the father is held accountable for a hereditary cause beyond his fault. It is the friction between reincarnation and resurrection.

So, the Muslim world rightly condemns this man, but fails to see Islam as the underlying cause. It is Islam, choking its former reincarnation cultureIt is Muslims themselves, worldwide, who are responsible for these honor killing massacres. Something that is certainly not yet reflected in the Muslim mind. Therefore, the condemnation of this man is vicarious shame for their own moral failure.

Honor killings are life-and-death fights between fathers and daughters. But neither party knows what is happening. The father fights for his afterlife and the daughter for her worldly survival:




                                                                      














































(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 400-600)




















































But an assumed time causality between HR2 as a function of HR1 with no underlying theoretical basis can easily be based on a fake causality or a false correlation. So there is a limitation to this rule and later religions are not always functions of former 
religions on face value.









(313) Sexual Theory of Religion: How it's made 





(2) Human religion, the timelessness derivative of sexuality



                                 (4) Human religion as operant conditioning






(3) The Tragedy of God

      (79) Sexual crisis in Islam








(4) Human religion as operant conditioning

        (306) Human religion as operant conditioning
        (272) Operant conditioning Muslim faith and its disintegration 



       (306) Human religion as operant conditioning

Classical conditioning (Pavlov's dog):

Conditioned and unconditioned stimuli:
Natural relations are mostly unconditioned. They happen by inherent causality. The saliva of Pavlov’s dog is an example of an unconditioned response on the offering of meat as an unconditioned stimulus.

Before experiment: 

Meat: unconditioned stimulus.
Saliva: unconditioned response.


But later, saliva becomes a conditioned response on the light as a conditioned stimulus in an artificial relation:
  Experiment phase 1 (reinforcement):
Light: conditioned stimulus.
Meat: unconditioned stimulus.
Saliva: unconditioned response.
                          
  Experiment phase 2:  
  Light: conditioned stimulus.                                                                              Saliva: conditioned response.
As we see, there is no natural causal relation between light and saliva. Light is a superimposed stimulus leading to a psychologically caused association.

SR-relations (Stimulus - Response)

Now, religion turns also natural caused relations into psychological ones, into magical thinking. Religion exists of artificial SR relations. We can only understand religion scientifically if we are able to trace conditioned SR relations back to their former unconditioned ones.


Operant Conditioning (Skinner's pigeons)

Operant conditioning is the reinforcement of desired behavior with a reward afterwards:
Classical situation:
Unknown trigger: unconditioned stimulus.
Pigeon pecks on button: unconditioned response. 
          Transition to operant conditioning: 
Unknown trigger: unconditioned stimulus.
Pigeon pecks on button: unconditioned response.
Reinforcement: conditioned by reward afterwards.
Operant conditioning: 
Operant response (OR): pecking the button
Reinforcing stimulus (RS): getting a grain 

Classical and operant conditioning

In classical conditioning the conditioned response (saliva) resembles the response elicited by the unconditioned stimulus: the meat. The saliva response is identical in conditioned and unconditioned situations. And that means that the behavior of the dog will not be shaped. 
Light: conditioned stimulus.
Meat: unconditioned stimulus.
Saliva: unconditioned response.
In operant conditioning however behavior can be shaped into all kinds of directions:
Unknown trigger: unconditioned stimulus.
Pigeon pecks on button: unconditioned response.
Reinforcement: conditioned reward afterwards.
Pigeon pecks two times on button: conditioned response.
Reinforcement: conditioned reward afterwards (new direction).
With all kinds of procedures one can influence behavior by operant conditioning. Operant conditioning means that the individual has to take some particular behavior to attain the reward. A pigeon must peck in some order to get the grain. His behavior 'operates' on the environment to get a reward. Hence, it is called operant behavior.

But in classical conditioning, respondent behavior is directly under control of the stimulus: the dog has to salivate if it smells meat.


Now it is obvious that religious indoctrination must consist mainly of operant conditioning. 

(5) Honor killings caused by inbreeding and incest














(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales

     (16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam 
     (193) Masochism love, hate and fear ๐Ÿ”ด


     
                   (244) SM-dyad broken down by masochism hate and fear⚠️
  


                 (265) Sadomasochism, Masochism hate and fear (Tahrir Square)




(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales





                 (92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught









                




(7) Honor killings in Islamic culture






























(8) Honor killing Scenarios





Assumption 111An honor killing can [sometimes] be seen as a human sacrifice, by which the father desperately confirms his belief in the parallel universe of Allah. By killing his daughter he makes earthly reincarnation impossible.




Is this a crazy theory? Yes, it is, but millions of honor killings in history ask for crazy theories. In this theory we correlated father love with degree of violence. The more intense the love for his daughter, the more gruesome her killing must be. 









The more I love my daughter the more gruesome her killing

Immanent Allah sees everything and perceives the sinister motives of the father. Reincarnation into the universe is a mortal sin. The father has sinned. Now Allah must be very angry, where upon the father calculates his chances on eternal life. He already can forget earthly reincarnation with this unwilling daughter, but now he must fear also losing heaven in the parallel universe. He must do penance for Allah to come into heaven anyway. Without penance he would burn in hell forever.


Assumption 111An honor killing can [sometimes] be seen as a human sacrifice, by which the father desperately confirms his belief in the parallel universe of Allah. By killing his daughter he makes earthly reincarnation impossible.

Note that a sinister moment of 'calm before the storm' occurs, where the daughter thinks that her father has abandoned the idea of the arranged marriage. This is seen correctly because he has realized that he must kill his daughter in the name of Allah. After some period of silence he will set a trap and invite her to restore family tiesThis fatal moment occurred in the cases of Sadia Sheikh and Gรผlsรผm Selim.

Daughter [OR: Escapes from home ==> PR: removes quarrels with her father] 
Father [OR: silent, thinks about killing ==> PR: Daughter thinks the crisis is over]

Now because he loves his daughter dearly the penance must look real. He cannot strangle her with a pillow because then she would not be hurt. That’s no penance. Then yet he will burn in hellNo, it is he who must feel and show real suffering. 
Hence the more he loves her, the more violent the kill must be. Of course his beloved daughter must show also sincere sufferingSo he thinks he has to slaughter her in the most brutal and gruesome way.

Father [OR: invites daughter home again ==> PR: Daughter thrilled with joy]
Father [OR: Slaughters his daughter gruesome ==> NR: Comes in Heaven again]


Correcting cognitive dissonance

Now, after having paid the highest price on earth that a loving father can pay, he corrected for cognitive dissonance and certainly will deserve the kingdom of heaven.

Is this a crazy theory? Yes, it is, but millions of honor killings in history ask for crazy theories. In this theory we correlated father love with degree of violence. The more intense the love for his daughter, the more gruesome her killing must be.

We think that those killers do not have a heart. But we can be wrong. Cognitive dissonance could be an intervening variable, installed by Islamic culture. Hence, we need also to develop a working model for Muslim fathers with a huge bond with their daughters. This all means that already in pre-puberty relations between daughters and fathers should be loosened. Obscene interest in the reproductive organs of daughters must be punished with immediate eviction from home of the daughter, by law and by force.


Assumption 161: Addressing honor killings.

4. Honor killings arise from the over-identification of fathers with their 
daughters, who they regard as possessions. It is the sublimation of the forbidden incest instinct. They do not see them as subjects but as objects, as extensions of themselves, as ribs, so to speak. Therefore fathers develop a morbid self-projection in their daughters out in suffocating control over their behavior. It is a form of stalking. 
Honor killings are promoted by an overly close relationship between fathers and
daughters at puberty. The relaxation of sick relations between fathers and daughters in pre-puberty is a prerequisite to preventing honor killings.


7. Western psychologists should not try to improve bad relations between Muslim girls and their parents at puberty. Young women perceiving the morbid interest of fathers in their reproductive system must be taken away from home immediately. The bond between fathers and daughters must be broken by law forcefully. 



(9) The Convergence Theory of Paradise
                     (220) Retrieving the unconscious (Convergence Theory)
                     (228) Replacing the Convergence Theory of Paradise




The Myth of Paradise

The message of inbreeding and incest should be passed as an initiation rite to boys in puberty. That message was the Paradise story. This lust for inbreeding and incest is bubbling for millions of years on from the darkest recesses of the male's mind and is driven by testosterone. Of origin it has nothing to do with all sorts of deep philosophical considerations of good and evil. Homininae had no time for reflection because they had to pull roots out of the ground to survive. But it may be in the evening campfire, if they made fire already like Homo erectus.







The Myth of the Garden of Eden

Earlier we concluded that honor killings and acid attacks cannot be explained without a very strong drive. And that ‘honor’ is no option. Honor is a hollow shell. It is a rationalization for Muslims who suppress their collective unconscious. Honor also has no cybernetic model and cannot give sharp predictions.

Instead we need a very strong drive, an archetype or even better, an instinct. Something so powerful, that fathers are forced to mass killings on their daughters in a systematic way, thousands of girls a year, millions of women in history.

As claimed before, inbreeding is theoretically involved in honor killings. In our view, it is the only candidate for a super strong instinct. Above all it has been conditioned on reincarnation into the (earthly) universe for millions of years. It follows that inbreeding and incest combined with earthly reincarnation is the unbeatable cause for honor killings and acid attacks:

Assumption 144: Secondary reinforcement:
In primary religion, human inbreeding developed as an operant response
followed by a reinforcing stimulus (of the expectation) of reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. Earthly reincarnation is the prevailing instinctive reward for inbreeding:

Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe

This translation is not quite correct because the Tree of Knowledge is not inbreeding per se, but rather offers Eve the choice between inbreeding or outbreeding. It seeks a balance between the seductions of outbreeding with a handsome Serpent, and the offer of inbreeding with her brother Adam, what only preserves genetic immortality for tribal males. But in broader sense it gives the right proportion between good and evil, between inbreeding and outbreeding.


The complication is that Adam was sent away too because he did not notice the affair of Eve with the Serpent. That's because this initiation rite is meant for young men and wanted to make clear that men had to restrain the natural lust for genetic diversity in women. It also was their fault if women became adulterous. And normally Adam would join the clan again by stoning his cousin sister, but that would be somewhat too coarse for a myth.


Hence, the Tree of Knowledge demonstrates the mental conflict women feel between their natural desires for genetic diversity versus unnatural genetic monoculture. Therefore in exogamous Christianity Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding, the Tree of Knowledge and in endogamous Islam Adam  desired genetic monoculture and ate from the Tree of Inbreeding, the Tree of Life (what was permitted by God!!). Many thousand years ago people must have understand better what we have forgotten. 


In Islam Adam chooses for the Tree of Life:

(The Quran, Surat Taha [20:120])
Sahih International

Then Satan whispered to him; he said, "O Adam, shall I direct you to the tree of eternity and possession that will not deteriorate?"





The Convergence Theory of Paradise

Therefore the factor connecting Tree of Life (males, Adam) with Tree of Knowledge (females, Eve) must be inbreeding and incest. But because there are no data available we simulate a symbolic factor analysis, where we 'rotate' the Tree of Life (Religion) to the Tree of Knowledge (sexuality).

Hence, we play imaginary principal component analysis without data. 
We iteratively bend the Tree of Knowledge (Sexuality) to the Tree of Life (Religion), seeking for the common factor f = inbreeding in OR-f-RS. A factor we already have taken for granted.

OR = operant response
RS = reinforcing stimulus

Operant responseTree of Knowledge (inbreeding)
Primary reinforcing stimulus: Tree of Life (genetic immortality)
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: Tree of Life (earthly reincarnation)
Thirdly reinforcing stimulus: Tree of Life (parallel reincarnation)

Three Trees of Life show three stages in human religious development:




Without data we behave unscientifically, of course. On this blog we offer a rational design of religion derived from the animal world. This is no scientific study. We perform a mental or symbolic factor analysis in which we invent the intermediate steps by ourselves. We imagine the necessary iterations between these trees, to obtain convergence to the common factor: inbreeding and incest.

Actually, next analysis has been made already in 2010 and was the start of this blog. It "bubbled up in my collective unconscious by testosterone". Only much later, a rational justification was found. Inbreeding and incest in the yellow area of the figure below were added some days later because the bare number of descendant's seemed an unsatisfactory explanation of the myth.

From the methodology of science nature and number are mostly associated in some way or another. Therefore, besides the number of offspring also their nature had to be inspected and that led to the saturation of genes in the offspring. But of course, afterwards this analysis looks somewhat silly.

If we look for a common factor between the trees of Paradise, they must lie in the same space. And that is only possible if sexuality and religion have common space. Now happily religion is but a subspace of sexual space. And both have only one natural dimension in common: inbreeding is a physical and timeless variable. This means beforehand that inbreeding must be the common factor. What is perfect circular reasoning.


Hereafter we conclude that the common factor between sexuality and religion must be inbreeding. And that the causal relation is immortality caused by inbreeding. (The yellow band is the common factor: Inbreeding).




(228) Replacing the Convergence Theory of Paradise

========================================


Explanation table Convergence Theory
This theory from:




Our first theory was that the Tree of Knowledge offered the choice to inbreeding or outbreeding. But now we developed a slightly better one, though not really different:

The right interpretation is the Tree of Knowledge leads to outbreeding and the Tree of Life to inbreeding. Therefore we have Eve - as a woman - eating from the Tree of Outbreeding in the Tanakh and Adam - as a man - eating from the Tree of Inbreeding in the Koran. 

With advanced knowledge it's no big deal. Both views are legitimate.

========================================


The trees are like vectors in space. Within 6 symbolic iterations they converge to their basic dimension: Inbreeding and incest. On this factor they must capitalize most of their common variance.




In sociological sense, paradise myth is the blueprint of morality in human culture. Norms and values, customs and habits are expressed on the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. These rules prescribe mandatory an appropriate lifestyle to attain immortality on the Tree of Life. Hence, religious systems optimize eternal life like economics maximizes prosperity.

Therefore the myth says that the Tree of Knowledge provides the right knowledge to reach immortality on the Tree of Life. In this version adultery and refusal of arranged marriages are prohibited. Because inbreeding and incest offers the only way in which males can obtain genetic immortality and/or reincarnation into the (earthly) universe.

Later in the evolution, genetic immortality was replaced by reincarnation.



(10) God’s Creations









How old is the Paradise Myth?

This myth is an exponent of the male inbreeding instinct in endogamous cultures and bubbles up from the deepest depths of male sexuality since Homininae. Language is not necessary.

As said, the Paradise Myth in question (Adam and his sister Eve) must have been changed numerous times in human evolution. It was an initiation rite for young males to enforce endogamy on their sisters cousins. 






All cultures started with genetic immortality and later projected their own advanced eternal dimensions in the myth. 

There are no signs of reincarnation in the Myth of Adam and Eve and there is also no parallel universe because 'heaven' is still meant as the ceiling of the world:

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-2/

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-3-8/


Now, we see how old this myth really must be, because 5000 years ago the Egyptians already believed in reincarnation and the parallel universe was well known. But their afterlife on the stars was still in the universe.

But a simple explanation could be that no culture likes to talk about reincarnation, because It would make this myth but hopelessly complicated.

The version of the parallel universe probably stems from East African Peoples, possibly mutations. Then it will not be older than 200.000 years (Homo sapiens). But this version with the parallel universe had to wait until monotheism became the most powerful sexual dictatorship ever on earth.

Bereishit - Genesis

http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/8166/jewish/Chapter-2.htm

God’s first creation

Bereishit - Genesis - Chapter 1

26. And God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and they shall rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the heaven and over the animals and over all the earth and over all the creeping things that creep upon the earth."

27. And God created man in His image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

Rashi's Commentary:
Show Hide

male and female He created themYet further (2:21) Scripture states: “And He took one of his ribs, etc.” The Midrash Aggadah (Gen. Rabbah 8:1, Ber. 61a, Eruvin 18a) explains that He originally created him with two faces, and afterwards, He divided him. The simple meaning of the verse is that here Scripture informs you that they were both created on the sixth [day], but it does not explain to you how they were created, and it explains [that] to you elsewhere. — [from Baraitha of the Thirty Two Methods , Method 13]

((BD. Ed.): the assumption here is that God’s first creation is the general statement in a deduction, wherein both man and woman subdue the earth, but that God’s second creation is the deduced conclusion: men subdues more than women. In fact God meant: men subdues women

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%203&version=KJV

Gen 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.))


28. And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the sky and over all the beasts that tread upon the earth. "

and subdue it: The“vav” [in ื•ְื›ִื‘ְืฉֻׁื”ָ is missing, [allowing the word to be read ื•ְื›ִื‘ְืฉָׁื”, the masculine singular imperative] to teach you that the male subdues the female that she should not be a gadabout *(Gen. Rabbah 8:12), and it is also meant to teach you that the man, whose way it is to subdue, is commanded to propagate, but not the woman (Yev. Yev. 65b).

* Gadabout = a habitual pleasure-seeker.

((BD. Ed.): There was no God, but there had been a much older exogamous culture of outbreeding in which women were respected (homo erectus (2 mya; 900cc)).

29. And God said, "Behold, I have given you every seed bearing herb, which is upon the surface of the entire earth, and every tree that has seed bearing fruit; it will be yours for food.

30And to all the beasts of the earth and to all the fowl of the heavens, and to everything that moves upon the earth, in which there is a living spirit, every green herb to eat," and it was so.

it will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth: He equated cattle and the beasts to them [to man] regarding the food [that they were permitted to eat]. He did not permit Adam and his wife to kill a creature and to eat its flesh; only every green herb they were all permitted to eat equally. When the sons of Noah came, He permitted them to eat flesh, as it is said (below 9:3): “Every creeping thing that is alive, etc.” Like the green herbs, which I permitted to the first man, I have given you everything. — [from Sanh. 59b]

(BD: In this comment Rashi deliberately processes God’s second creation (Adam and Eve) into the first. It is well done if God really exists.  But otherwise Jewish editors are explaining an artificial opposition inserted by themselves. Then it would be circle reasoning. )

31. And God saw all that He had made, and behold it was very good, and it was evening and it was morning, the sixth day.

Bereishit - Genesis

http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/8166/jewish/Chapter-2.htm


God’s second creation

Bereishit - Genesis - Chapter 2

1. Now the heavens and the earth were completed and all their host.
2. And God completed on the seventh day His work that He did, and He abstained on the seventh day from all His work that He did.
3. And God blessed the seventh day and He hallowed it, for thereon He abstained from all His work that God created to do.

7. And the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground, and He breathed into his nostrils the soul of life, and man became a living soul.
8. And the Lord God planted a garden in Eden from the east, and He placed there the man whom He had formed.

from the east: Hebืžִืงֶּื“ֶื. In the east of Eden, He planted the garden (Midrash Konen).

Now if you ask: It has already been stated (above 1:27): “And He created man, etc.!”

I saw in the Baraitha of Rabbi Eliezer the son of Rabbi Jose the Galilean concerning the thirty-two principles by which the Torah is expounded, and this is one of them [method 13]:

general statement followed by a specific act, the latter constitutes a specific [clarification] of the first [general statement].

“And He created man.” This is a general statement. It left obscure whence he was created, and it left His deeds obscure [i.e., how God created man].

The text repeats and explains: “And the Lord God formed, etc.,” and He made the Garden of Eden grow for him, and He placed him in the Garden of Eden, and He caused a deep sleep to fall upon him.

The listener may think that this is another story, but it is only the detailed account of the former.

Likewise, in the case of the animal, Scripture repeats and writes (below verse 19): “And the Lord God formed from the ground all the beasts of the field,” in order to explain, “and He brought [them] to man” to name them, and to teach about the fowl, that they were created from the mud.

Comment BD: What Rashi want to tell:

Deductive argument within God’s first story:

1: Humans subdue the earth.
2: Women are humans.
3: Women subdue the earth.

But if God’s first creation story is the general statement and the second narrative (Paradise Myth) is a differentiation (deduction), then the conditions of the first story must hold in the second. What means that the Paradise Myth is a subset of the first creation story.

Rashi is right, when he claims:

Deductive argument:

1: Humans subdue the earth.
2: Women are humans.
3: Women subdue the earth but not in equivalency nor in equality. (In fact Adam is subduing Eve in the Paradise Myth).

The conclusion only holds for as far subduing power of women is not nullified.

What is the reason that women in paradise story had virtually no power left? In God's first creation story men and women were seen as equivalent subjectsBut in paradise story women were relegated to inert objects. That’s because women will never participate voluntary in a genetic monoculture, which must be enforced at the expense of their natural rights.



In the Sexual Theory of Religion:

1: Male and female subdue the earth in genetic diversity.
2: But Eve is a woman in a genetic monoculture.
3: Hence, Eve subdues the earth in genetic diversity but not in a genetic monoculture

Again, the genetic monoculture is a specialization of genetic variation. That's correct. However, the power of men over women is not given by God, but man denied women their own identityadmirably illustrated by degrading her as a rib taken from his body.



Original Text:

ืจ' ืืœืขื–ืจ ื‘ืฉื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกื™ ื‘ืŸ ื–ืžืจื” ื•ื›ื‘ืฉื•ื” ื•ื›ื‘ืฉื” ื›ืชื™ื‘, ื”ืื™ืฉ ืžืฆื•ื•ื” ืขืœ ืคืจื™ื” ื•ืจื‘ื™ื” ืื‘ืœ ืœื ื”ืืฉื”, ืจ' ื™ื•ื—ื ืŸ ื‘ืŸ ื‘ืจื•ืงื” ืื•ืžืจ ืื—ื“ ื”ืื™ืฉ ื•ืื—ื“ ื”ืืฉื” ืขืœ ืฉื ื™ื”ื ื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจ ื•ื™ื‘ืจืš ืื•ืชื ืืœื”ื™ื ื•ื’ื•', ื•ื›ื‘ืฉื•ื” ื•ื›ื‘ืฉื” ื›ืชื™ื‘, ื”ืื™ืฉ ื›ื•ื‘ืฉ ืืฉืชื• ืฉืœื ืชืฆื ืœืฉื•ืง, ืฉื›ืœ ืืฉื” ืฉื™ื•ืฆืื” ืœืฉื•ืง ืกื•ืคื” ืœื”ื›ืฉืœ
Translation:

Rabbi Eleazar in the name of Rabbi Yose ben Zimra [says: Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and] ‘you [plural] subdue it’ (kivshuha) is read, but ‘subdue her’ (kivshah) is written. [This means thatthe man is commanded to ‘be fruitful and multiply’ and not the woman. Rabbi Yohanan ben Beroka says both the man and the woman are meant [since it is written]: ‘And God blessed them (both) saying “Be fruitful and multiply . . .”’ [The reason that there is a difference between the read and written forms of ] kivshuha and kivshah is because the man subdues his wife so that she does not go seeking in the marketplace.
[Translation by Rabbi Steve Greenberg]

Suggested Discussion Questions:
1. It appears here and elsewhere that there was some controversy regarding a woman's duty to reproduce and related challenges of female sexuality. Why should it make sense not to obligate women to reproduce? Is there an argument for making reproduction an equal duty that makes sense to you?

2. Note: Rabbi jose ben Zimra uses the written from of "subdue" in the singular to refer not to subduing the earth but in relation to the phrase earlier "be fruitful and multiply." Rabbi Yohanan ben Beroka instead sees both sexes as obligated to reproduce but that husbands are called upon to subdue their wives desire in order to prevent them from looking for satisfaction elsewhereIn either case females, like the earth need to be subdued by men. What about female sexuality do you think challenges men even today?

13. And the name of the second river is Gihon; that is the one that encompasses all the land of Cush (Ethiopiรซ).

15. Now the Lord God took the man, and He placed him in the Garden of Eden to work it and to guard it.
16. And the Lord God commanded man, saying, "Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat.
17But of the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat of it, for on the day that you eat thereof, you shall surely die."
18. And the Lord God said, "It is not good that man is alone; I shall make him a helpmate opposite him."
19. And the Lord God formed from the earth every beast of the field and every fowl of the heavens, and He brought [it] to man to see what he would call it, and whatever the man called each living thing, that was its name.
20. And man named all the cattle and the fowl of the heavens and all the beasts of the field, but for man, he did not find a helpmate opposite him.
21. And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon man, and he slept, and He took one of his sides, and He closed the flesh in its place.
22. And the Lord God built the side that He had taken from man into a woman, and He brought her to man.

23. And man said, "This time, it is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. This one shall be called ishah (woman) because this one was taken from ish (man)."

24Therefore, a man shall leave his father and his mother, and cleave to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.
25. Now they were both naked, the man and his wife, but they were not ashamed.

29. And God said, "Behold, I have given you every seed bearing herb, which is upon the surface of the entire earth, and every tree that has seed bearing fruit; it will be yours for food.
30. And to all the beasts of the earth and to all the fowl of the heavens, and to everything that moves upon the earth, in which there is a living spirit, every green herb to eat," and it was so.

it will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth: He equated cattle and the beasts to them [to man] regarding the food [that they were permitted to eat]. He did not permit Adam and his wife to kill a creature and to eat its flesh; only every green herb they were all permitted to eat equally. When the sons of Noah came, He permitted them to eat flesh, as it is said (below 9:3): “Every creeping thing that is alive, etc.” Like the green herbs, which I permitted to the first man, I have given you everything. — [from Sanh. 59b]


(11) The Fundamental Equation in Human Religion
















(13) The Evolution of Female Religion









                       (310) Why Islam changed the Myth of Paradise






(14) The Conquest of Endogamous Populations

(15) A new approach to Honor killings 
(15) Een nieuwe benadering van Eerwraak








(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam



(17) Proving other faiths as objects




As long as Muslim males can maintain that women are objects they can exercise their sadistic lust undisturbed on their helpless bodies. This is called autistic or cultural psychopathy.


On the one hand their unbridled sadistic lust causes masochistic behavior in their victims, and they may not recognize this masochism because women must stay objects.

And therefore Muslim males hate the masochistic behavior in their victims because it undermines their worldview. Objects are not allowed to have those feelings. They try to beat the emotion, the masochism out of their bodies. But the harder they try, the more visible the masochism. That makes them furious until the horrible masochism overpowers the Muslim fighter. At that moment masochism hatred changes into masochism fear. Sexual scales start to break SM-dyad into murder and sexual lust until this object shows no feelings any more.






(18) Islam and Christianity in Paradise

              (122) Islam is a hybrid religion
  



(285) Honor killings, how it's made, HR = f(SR)
(276) Muslim male religion sets up to honor killings


                 (310) Why Islam changed the Myth of Paradise





(19) The Battle of Allahs





We must reduce a 1.8 billion n-space of believers to a one-dimensional m-space of Allahs. At the start of the analysis Muslims span a 1.8 billion n-space. But we know that many Muslims have little uniqueness, hence they have narrow angles between their vectors, which are highly correlated and interdependent. And that means that the 1.8 billion n-space of believers shrinks to an area of much lower rank. Probably, the rank of the n-space in reality is not larger than 10 or 20 orthogonal dimensions. And then it is much easier to iterate n-space to m-space.

If we want to identify the main factors or principal components of the Allah m-vector space, we first need some theory about 'religion'. How do we define religion on this site?


In the following we conclude that the contrast between genetic monoculture (male) and genetic diversity (women) is the real basis of human religion. It is inbreeding versus outbreeding.





(20) Islam, the Red Giant




(21) The Basic Dimension of Religion



(22) Antipodal Religions in Basic Dimension 






(23) Counter-cyclical cultures in Basic Dimension



(24) Crumbling Islam lost tribal identity





(25) Honor killings in short





(26) Religions identified by group permeability



(27) Thou shalt propagate in genetic diversity



(28) The Key to Human Religion (Part 1) [Mammals]
(29) The Key to Human Religion (Part 2) [Homininae]
(30) The Key to Human Religion (Part 3) [Homo erectus]
(31) The Key to Human Religion (part 4) [Homo sapiens]

(32) The Archetype of God

                      (102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom 

















(33) Chrislam, God of Policor






(34) Freedom of Speech



Assumption 214: Freedom of expression is a quality of the exogamous periphery of the group and is always indebted to the endogamous divine core. Therefore, there is no absolute freedom of expression other than subject to the prevailing basic morality.



(35) Religion and endogamy





(36) Non-sexual religion in Basic Dimension



Sexuality, the unconscious base of human religion

Deep inside, believers unconsciously feel the primordial power of sexuality in religion and are extremely embarrassed when pointed on this origin       

They do not understand their extravagant interest in vulgarities as prostitution, condom use and homosexuality. But on the other side rarely they speak about really important things that should matter as heaven in the parallel universe. That's a bit peculiar.

This is understandable because "religion" is the timelessness dimension of sexuality. And prostitution, condom use and homosexuality do not lead to more children in the clan. Hence, it obstructs the timelessness dimension. Which means the deepest base of Christianity is still the family as most fertile condition for eternal survival, just like inbreeding and incest of Homininae. 







(37) The Timelessness of Endogamy

          (52) Space-time, wormhole to God for primitive man
          (53) Space-time for Hominids




  
   

Below an instructive analogy, which goes wrong because higher derivatives are quite logical and fully understandable and cannot represent the paradigm shift from pedophilia in this world to perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe:



(38) Killing Honor







(39) Killing Honor by fading Perpetual Orgasm



(40) Perpetual Orgasm, the Fourth God

But besides pedophilia indicates non-equivalent sexual relations based on paraphilia it nowadays is generally seen as disgusting and immoral. But as stated there is also a fundamental religious component in pedophilia. Child marriages are directly traceable to the anachronistic core of male religion: Perpetual Orgasm, the fourth God.



(41) Pedophilia, crowbar in human religion
     



(308) From pedophilia to perpetual orgasm
(43) The Incest Inbreeding Compensation Model



(44) The Evolution of Pedophilia






(42) The Split in Panini Religion



(45) Selective breeding with Homininae





(46) The Schengen Necrology of European Culture
              (155) The Melania Trump effect


Schengen writes the necrology of European culture.

Western culture, too long profited of Christianity and meanwhile forgot to formulate an exogamic core more realistic than the Enlightenment. The Enlightenment, which found no means to discriminate between groups on which Romanticism (Marxism) judged all cultures equal (multiculturalism). That's the real Dutch tragedy of the last 50 years.

For Western culture, it seems the only way to regain power and to rebuild its culture is a new endogamous core that distinguishes between peopleBut that is anathema to the Enlightenment and comes down to 'racism'. Hence, as long as the Enlightenment is the current endogamous core this will not happen. That's the dilemma of Western society. Because of this impasse civil war seems inevitable.

That's why Geert Wilders has to fight Islamic culture instead of Muslims. So, there is only one hypothetical wormhole through which the exogamous Western culture can escape and 
not to be slaughtered by the endogamous core of Islamic hatred.  

But of course, this is dancing on the edge of the volcano. There only needs to be done little to address the aggression against Muslims themselves, because this difference is only artificially applied to formulate a wormhole in Enlightenment to the rescue of Western culture. 

This is artificially, because a strong interaction exists between ethnicity and culture especially in
 selective breeding cultures.

So, Western society brought itself into real trouble and will not overcome this Gordian knot 
without violence.


(47) The Curse of Enlightenment
(48) Federica Mogherini's lustful submission to Chrislam ๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ด (Timon Dias)


(301) The Muslim immigration is a Christian sexual disorder
(302) The model of the Muslim immigration
(303) Muslim immigration: The dark side of Christianity
(49) The Fatal Flaw in Islam

      (102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom 



         (307) Intermittent reinforcement, magic wand of human religion


(50) The Cause of Chrislam




(51) Women's emancipation causes Chrislam

(52) Space-time, wormhole to God for primitive man
(53) Space-time for Hominids
          (37) The Timelessness of Endogamy

(54) Roots of racism


Assumption 240: The development of racism.

1: In the animal world groups accept only members of the same kind so they can propagate. Hence, a group of gorillas will not accept a female chimp. This is discrimination between species. Later in the evolution, a different form of discrimination emerged, but now as discrimination within species, called racism.

2: Though all kind of Homininae (7 Mya; 400 cc) possibly were of the same species, they already started to select their own kind, their own race. Within the same species their group identity drifted away from pure physical propagation into the religious propagation of tribal identity (religion). So, they were not interested in pure propagation with other Homininae races any longer, but more in maintaining feelings from tribal identity. But the best way to control for tribal belongingness was race, not culture what could be faked, if they could speak and understand each other. So, Homininae already attended to external racial characteristics to select between and within groups from the same species for a not racial goal.

3: Much later racism must have been strengthened further through reincarnation into the tribe (Homo erectus (2 Mya, 900 cc)). For, only by pure inbred bodies from descendants, ancestors could reincarnate into the tribe. Concluding, real racism started with the Homininae (7 Mya; 400cc) and was strengthened by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).

4: Homo sapiens (350 YA; 1400cc) developed bigger tribes and bigger cultures. Still, tribal belongingness (religion) was noticed from the racial appearance of foreigners. The same in the later period of ethnic endogamy. Only later in religious endogamy, factual religion (Islam, Christianity) really became more important than race. For example, today the religious endogamic outer layer of Islam is not filled with Arabs any longer, but with a billion people from other races. Yet, we judge Islam as a completely racist culture because it distinguishes between human beings like the Nazis: It oppresses 'other sexual roles' and kills non-believers.

5: Concluding: in the evolution preserving genes from groups has been changed into preserving religion within human tribes.

6: But because selective breeding cultures like Islam imply strong interactions between ethnicity and culture, racial appearance still effectively triggers cultural (religious) discrimination. Therefore, also in the modern world racism continues to be a simple and effective mechanism to distinguish between persons from different cultures. Obviously, this results in many errors of judgment.



(55) The time derivative of sexual culture


Religion can be seen as developed from a time derivative of sexual culture










(56) Homo orgasmus



(57) Chrislamic orgasm ๐Ÿ”ด







(58) Homo naledi: Antedating Human Religion
















(59) The Killer Hominid

Killer Hominids are made by evolution in harsh environments. And since we all are partly killer Hominids this discussion is about gradation. The first pathological killer is the chimpanzee (Pan paniscus), which evolved in an environment with insufficient food supply. He must be compared with the friendly and socialized bonobo (Pan troglodytes).

Second psychopathic killers were inhabitants of Paradise culture, humanlike creatures which evolved under harsh conditions of the steppes and deserts of Africa and whose descendants are now living in the arid regions of the Arabian Peninsula. From them comes the acclaimed paradise story.

Both, chimpanzees and Paradise culture underwent severe genetic selections. In the evolution chimp males have been killed systematically if they did not fit into the hierarchy. Consequently, certain traits have been culled in the course of million years of evolution.

The same occurred with Paradise culture where members not fitting in the inbreeding and incest culture have been murdered systematically for about 7 million years. 

Muslims are the lineal descendants of Paradise culture.





Assumption 459Honor killings are caused by separation anxiety disorder.
Tribal separation anxiety leads to a transient psychosis in the minds of fathers, killing their daughters in an unconscious battle on life and death.



(73) The Sexual Theory of Religion  (Part 1: 1-59)
(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)
(75) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 3: 120-400)
(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 400-600)

(77) Homo naledi from rebirth to reincarnation 



















(78) Roaming led to bonobo religion

(79) Sexual crisis in Islam

                (3) The Tragedy of God



The crisis in Islam

For Muslim fathers the unconscious expectation of earthly reincarnation is destroyed. This is a tragedy of unprecedented magnitude. The unconscious schizophrenia of earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection has become manifest. The 1400-year dormant ulcer has ruptured in complete schizophrenic psychopathy. 

The monotheistic bubble will burst and the Arab culture has to choose. Freedom of sexual roles, as in Western exogamy. Or a relapse to Paradise culture, in which every man is his own God again and rules his tribe without any law (Sharia) or consultation (mosque) of society.

So, we await a sexual clash between Muslim gods in the near future. Fights started in number in 2011 at Tahrir Square in Egypt where Muslim males defended their straight God by sexual violence against women. These sexual harassment and rapes were thought to have been a tactic of the Mubarak-era state used against female activists since 2005. 

But that would be too easy. It definitely is the weakening of the grip of Sharia on male testosterone. It is the collapse of Islam as primitive ordering of society. Monotheism failed in the end.

Islam loses grip on males because the system is unable to provide sufficient females. A lot of demographic reasons will be find back in refugee camps. And in this tangled interaction pornography finds its place in the disintegration of the Islamic system. 
Islam is going down to Paradise culture again. Islam will fall down into uncontrolled male testosterone.

The quicksand under Islamic monotheism will be washed away by the internet. And that means Sharia loses influence. Soon every Muslim will again be his own God without law or consultation by society.






What means Arab Muslims are likely to fall back into the utter brutality of previous Paradise culture where rampant sadomasochism of their ancestors was so typical.

Possibly Islam will never return to Sharia which at least had some rules to control testosterone, but it will perish in a wild form of sexual arbitrariness and absolute crime. That's what we saw earlier with Aborigines and Native Americans in a diluted form.

The requirement of absolute rigidity of this totalitarian system will be completely undermined by technological innovation. As tribal endogamy (inbreeding and incest) Islam can no longer exist. Neither as ethnic endogamy (Arabic Muslims), nor as religious endogamy (rest of the world) will it survive. The loss of the ancient core of inbreeding and incest will be the end of Islam.

At present, an unprecedented paradigm change of monotheism is taking place before our eyes. The coming clash between gay and straight gods will put religion in its proper context.

Should we be afraid of Islam as world religion? Definitely not. 
Religions are just ideologies. Islam is an aggressive totalitarian ideology regressing to pure criminality these days. The Arab core of tribal endogamy will disintegrate into the pure criminality of Paradise culture which can be fight. The great danger comes from Islamic gangs getting nuclear weapons.



(80) Why gay people must be sick

(81) The future of Islam






(82) Political correctness as sexual disorder
(83) Women's suffrage

(84) Forbidden fruit in Paradise

Forbidden fruit is a phrase that originates from Genesis concerning Adam and Eve in Genesis 2:16–17. In the narrative, the fruit of good and evil was eaten by Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, which they had been commanded not to do by God. As a metaphor, the phrase typically refers to any indulgence or pleasure that is considered illegal or immoral. 



(85) Homo naledi: Body and soul ๐Ÿ”ด








(86) The fascination for sadism 


The necessary tension between core and mantle vanished and Western culture lost control of sexual culture in the mantle by the lost moral authority of the core.




According to the model of sexual religion the core always consists of sadism (the Alpha male) and the mantle is composed of masochism (other sexual roles). This means Western culture became a rudderless masochistic society without direction. This, because masochism derives its meaning only from sadism, such as a line needs two points for direction.

And that's why multiculturalism unwittingly turned into the masochistic squirm with ass up for a gruesome and sadistic Islamic ruler. This sadistic tyrant was absolutely needed to let our masochistic culture retrieve its counterweight. This is because two points are needed to draw a straight line. 

Determinatio negatio est (Spinoza 1647). Determination is negation. In order to be determined, in order to exist as a particular entity, it is necessary to ignore the opposite. So, existence is to deny the opposite. Everything that exists in the world (masochism) requires for its existence also the existence of its opposite (sadism). The direction in space of masochism is determined by sadism as the line between two points.

Omnis determinatio negatio est. (Determination of denial). In other words, of course, the following also applies: every decision to do something is also a decision not to do something else.




First, the absolute exogamy of Western culture indicates a faded rose soon falling apart into individualism. On the other hand the culture might be desperately looking for a new equilibrium. After the sixties it seems Western culture was looking for a new sadistic endogamous core. In the world no culture is more sadistic than Islam. Therefore Western Europe introduced tens of millions of Muslims in 40 years. There was no need for smart and beautiful Asians who, after all, as Buddhists also represent masochism.


(87) The blessing of multiculturalism
(88) The Alpha Male of Dutch Parliament
(89) Marital rape

(90) Policor, the new religion

   (301) The Muslim immigration is a Christian sexual disorder
   (302) The model of the Muslim immigration
   (303) Muslim immigration: The dark side of Christianity

Assumption 258: Policor defined (Political Correctness).

A world wide caesura exists between policor and non-policor. Therefore, any analysis of policor must have universal coverage and must be valid for Christianity in the Western world as for Buddhism in Asia. Concerning policor former Christianity is opposed to Islam in Western Europe while the same happens with Buddhism in Asia.

What is the fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam? In the last century Christianity definitely switched to Vanilla-dyad while Islam kept SM-dyad. For example, in 1991 rape was abolished within marriage in the Netherlands. And forced tongue kissing and such innocuous was sentenced to prison for rape.

This arrogance of Western culture is shocking. Proud as they were with the Enlightenment, they denied SM-dyad as the corner stone of human sexual nature. 

In a radical change of direction feminists exchanged SM-dyad for Vanilla-dyad upon which Western culture went into a free fall. It is the fall of the Enlightenment which has been unable to formulate strict rules for the comparison of cultures. The Enlightenment gave way to the irresponsible Romanticism, to Marxism but also to insane feminism.

What is the fundamental difference between policor and non-policor in relation to Islam? In the Western world, policor women unconsciously became disappointed and unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad and subsequently wanted to merge with Islam to return into SM-dyad, called Chrislam. Since it is just women in the top of society who advocate the Muslim immigration beyond all borders. 

We must conclude there are only irrational and unconscious grounds for the influx of millions of Muslims in the Western world since rational grounds are falsified. It is much more complicated but in the end sexuality is the only passion to explain the Muslim immigration.

Understanding the relation between Islam and Christianity is a discourse on sexuality. Within sexuality, Islam and Christianity maintain a sadomasochistic relationship which is a sexual aberration from Judaism. Sadism and masochism need each other and it is clear both religions will ever collapse in a vortex of murder and manslaughter. SM-dyad will haunt mankind to the farthest stars.

We might not like this sexual model at all. But remember, the only thing that matters is to explain the Muslim immigration and to make reliable predictions about the future. Until now there has not been formulated a better model.



(91) Why Muslims kill homosexuals

            (80) Why gay people must be sick
           (180) Homosexuality and fertility stress 

According to the sexual theory of religion, Muslims kill gays because homosexuality is the second sexual role which is identical to the second GodRecognition of 

homosexuality would be the surrender of monotheism to polytheism. It would mean the end of the supremacy of Allah. That's identical to the distortion of the Muslim male self projection as a God. It would be the end of heterosexual male oppression of other sexual roles: female roles is the third God, pedophilia the fourth and bestiality the fifth:



Blogger Help Forum, Blogspot is adding extra lines with every update

(92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught

     (6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales
     (16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam
     (193) Masochism love, hate and fear ๐Ÿ”ด




(93) Christianity lost SM-dyad



(94) Rape and murder distinguish between religions ๐Ÿ”ด



(95) Policor fears the white elephant



(96) Mitochondrial DNA males and females



(97) The Alpha male started inbreeding and incest

(98) Inheritance patterns



(99) Breaking sadomasochism



(321) NUMBER ARCHIVE VISUALIZED: ART. 200-299
(322) NUMBER ARCHIVE VISUALIZED: ART. 300-399











MH17:

According to Almaz-Antey (manufacturer of BUK), the MH17 could not have been shot in a frontal collision with the BUK (from Snizhne), because then the nose of the aircraft would have been completely cut off. That's what we accept for a fact *:




Then there remain two possibilities left, the BUK came from the right side, allegedly from the separatists, or from the left side possibly from the Ukrainian Army.

A-A: The BUK cannot have been fired from the more distant Snezhnoye (Snizhne), because Snizhne lies in the path of the airplane, which would come to a frontal collision. Then, the ring of shrapnel would have cut off the nose of the fuselage in an instant.'



* Almaz-Antey, don't forget the drift angle of 4 degrees, which makes Snizhne no frontal collision. Although Snizhne lies somewhat on the ground track of the MH17, true track turns the plane 4 degrees to the right. And that means the alternatives from DSB and others, which lie more to the right of the plane, are relatively more on head-on collision what possibly makes them more unlikely:


Further, Almaz-Antey has no scientific experience with giant airplanes as the MH17. The BUK has been developed for small fighter jets. This means they cannot predict the behavior of extremely hot shrapnel, glued around the fuselage under enormous air pressure.

And because the semi-homing BUK did not follow a straight trajectory, it could have literally been launched from anywhere, although a BUK coming from the right side is most likely, given the damage.


Allegedly separatists from the right side:



Shrapnel follows the direction of the missile, but within a meter of the plane it is more perpendicular on that direction. Superhot shrapnel glued around the fuselage under pressure of the airstream came everywhere. (And the BUK may have gone through the roof of the cockpit from the left side):



A BUK coming from the right side fits the data rather well. But the left side is also quite well possible according to the damage done to the cockpit. Part of the casing has been shot in the second left window style, which window had a reasonably sharp angle with the longitudinal axis of the plane. This facilitates a BUK coming reasonably far from the left side of the plane while the exploding casing still could hit the window style. To be clear, an approach angle of 60 degrees from the left side to the longitudinal axis from the plane is very well possible. Launches from the official trapezium would sooner lead to sort of frontal collisions, so 60 degrees in not a bad guess:



Furthermore, in the last stage of the encounter the BUK is homing on metal from the plane and is not avoiding the collision, as seems to be in above pictures. The proximity fuse explodes with a certain acceleration from received radar pulses. But nowhere is stated the missile is steering around the object. So, do we know it passed the MH17 within one meter? No, because then it can also have pierced the roof from 60 degrees to the left, a side-impact collision.

sotilaspassi // September 28, 2015 at 2:00 pm //

Proximity fuse explode the warhead when some/any metal comes to it’s view. (IMO: exploded 2…5ms after the metal behind MH17 nose cone came into view.)
Proximity fuse does not see directly ahead, because it’s radar (receiver) is in missile nose. Missile is homing towards strongest radar echo coming from target, radar signal is sent by TELAR.
Finally, if someone would bring the MH17 down in a false flag operation, he would take care that the 'perpetrators' were in line with the ground track and would himself be at a large approach angle with the course of the MH17.

So there are two false flag options:

1: The most likely is that the Ukrainian army has misled the separatists with an AN-26, which in fact was the MH17. Then the BUK came from the official trapezoid in front of the MH17. 
2: The second possibility is that Ukraine has launched a BUK far away from the ground track of the MH17 on the left side with the intention of putting the blame on the separatists.

Parts of the BUK allegedly found in the left wing may also be caused by a missile coming from the left side. But are these finds trustworthy? At the end of the day only the albert_lex research from the Russian Army about the size of the holes in the fuselage likely can stand scientific standards. Most of the investigation makes no sense, because of fraudulent management from the wreckage over many months. Everything can have happened in this sham:




Possibly Ukrainian Army from the left side:






Key analysis points

The albert lex histogram

According to this blog, it has been proven the MH17 was shot down by the BUK with the bow-ties, if it was a BUK: 

MH17: The albert_lex histogram.
Only the profile of warhead 9N314M (bow-ties) passes the test of the histogram from albert_lex. The warhead self is not confirmed, because more warheads can pass the test and one of them has done the job. But I think we must conclude 9N314M is the only warhead not falsified by this histogram:






Head-on collision (not supported)

There has been some debate on this topic on the great site from Marcel van den Berg: http://www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com/As an example this chapter: 
http://www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com/questions-journalists-should-ask-dutch-safety-board-after-release-of-final-report-on-mh17/#comment-9451

Here I found one of my comments in a discussion with sotilaspassi who has experience with this subjectBasic Dimension // September 25, 2015 at 11:30 pm // Reply

It turned out that a head-on collision between the BUK and the MH17 is incompatible with the facts:

But a launch from the far left side remains possible, because of the angle of the second left window to the longitudinal axis of the plane.
Almaz Antey 

In the research by AA (Almaz Antey: Manufacturer of BUK) the launch of a BUK-missile from Snizhne is described:


‘Snezhnoye (Snizhne)

The BUK cannot have been fired from the more distant Snezhnoye (Snizhne), because Snizhne lies in the path of the airplane, which would come to a frontal collision. Then, the ring of shrapnel would have cut off the nose of the fuselage in an instant.




Of the windows of the right side of the flight deck nothing would be left, while those still intact today. Also missing on the right side are the rash holes. In addition, shrapnel submunition would not have achieved the fuselage, the left engine and certainly not the wing or tail. From Snizhne, the angle of the almost head-on collision in the horizontal plane is 5-20 degrees. And because Snizhne lies further away the vertical angle dropped between 0 and 12 degrees.’





Sotilaspassi 

sotilaspassi // September 28, 2015 at 2:00 pm //


>BD: But isn’t it the proximity fuse aims on the radar in the nose of the cockpit?
No, proximity fuse explode the warhead when some/any metal comes to it’s view. (IMO: exploded 2…5ms after the metal behind MH17 nose cone came into view.)
Proximity fuse does not see directly ahead, because it’s radar (receiver) is in missile nose.
Missile is homing towards strongest radar echo coming from target, radar signal is sent by TELAR.
My “simplified proportional navigation” idea makes the missile to cross the target flight path slightly before target, when shot from ahead.
This way, when missile is launched from slightly south of Snizhne, it will explode near pilot window. And when launched slightly north from Snizhne it will explode on co-pilot side.
If launched directly from ahead, the missile would explode on MH17 center line or penetrate the cockpit before exploding.

When approaching from side, it can be that strongest radar echo still comes from forward fuselage, but proximity fuse will anyway function a lot sooner vs coming from ahead.
(we would not see explosive residue in cockpit parts like we now see. IMO: fireball radius of 70kg warhead and 500kg rocket fuel exploding is only about 10m.)
I doubt BUK uses highly complex math when it approach the target. It rather rely in speed & brute force.

The situation



    
The wreckage has not been investigated for many months. Material has been removed or may have been deposited:





Anyway, the alleged BUK came from the right side:






Different sorts of impact


Different impact angles, from the enclosure of the warhead (casing) and shrapnel give the impression of different kinds of ammunition. Some investigators think of machine gun fire from fighter jets (violet/blue lines from perpendicular fragments). Anyway, the warhead exploded within less than a few meters from the nose of the plane. If the missile approached from the right side of the plane, then the casing must have exploded first and parts are still visible in the second left window style (yellow/blue lines). Probably the right side of the plane was separatist area. 

On the left side from the cockpit we see heavy shrapnel fragments which entered the fuselage perpendicularly. But coming from the right side (alleged Separatists) it is really difficult to make these orthogonal holes. Then the explosion must overturn the forward speed of the missile by an orthogonal force on the direction of the missile. But it can be seen clearly the holes X1 and X2 fit the hypothesis 'coming from the right side':





The 18 degree line


In the picture below, left above we see a ricochet from the casing of the warhead, which makes a sharp angle of about 18 degrees to the bottom line of the left window. Green arrows are other grazing marks from casing parts. Casing parts kept between the glass of the window and the window style can be found in the articles:





There are just two side conditions. Any missile collision course is acceptable which satisfies the casing parts in the second left window style and the perpendicular shrapnel holes in the cockpit fuselage.

BTW, notice the warhead exploded into a white hot halo formed cloud from shrapnel particles, which unfolded into all directions. Squeezed by the air stream this lancet embraced the fuselage. So, we have shrapnel aimed directly at the fuselage and particles which were indirectly pressed against the roof of the aircraft by the airflow:





Conclusion

The alleged BUK is most likely shot from the right side of the plane. But a launch from the far left side remains possible, because of the angle of the second left window to the longitudinal axis of the plane.The involvement of Russians and the alleged BUK is built on hard to control circumstantial evidence, heavenly interfered by the SBU. Further, the separatists had no spotters that day. The weather was bad and visibility poor and for information about an eventual Antonov An-26 freightcarrier from Kiev to the Russian border, they were fully dependent on the Ukrainian Army. Maybe there will ever be hard evidence blaming separatists in the future, but we are not there yet.


In case separatists shot the MH17

Separatists were out of spotters on 17 July 2014 and had no idea what plane really was coming. Daily, a lot of international planes crossed over the area. On that day, visibility was poor. There is broad agreement that separatists could impossibly have identified the MH17. 

Maybe the Ukrainian army or the SBU gave false information about an incoming Antonov An-26 freightcarrier from Kiev to the Russian border, flying on the same track, but in a lower air corridor. How? We don't know, but here is a possibility:

Maybe separatists eavesdropped Ukrainian BUKs:

Andrew // February 14, 2016 at 8:03 am //

“It is not considered in Buk design a scenario when enemy also has Buks. I doubt it was envisioned, particularly for older models”

The BUK’s possessed by Ukraine are legacy Soviet units that were previously fully integrated operationally with units in Russia proper. If they can no longer talk to each other electronically, it could only be from Ukraine changing the method of data link (anyone think UKRBORONPROM did that?) or encrypting it with a code somehow not possessed by Russia (seems farfetched given Russian penetration of Ukraine’s military and secrete services). Its unlikely that Almaz Antey removed backwards compatibility from Russia’s BUK-M1-2’s and BUK-M2’s. After all, one of the key selling points of BUK-M was its ability to control and guide firing stations of the prior air defense system called KUB.


False flag hypothesis: Ukraine could encrypt or decrypt the method of data link to falsely inform eventual penetrated Russian BUKs, whatever they wanted. Then, the Ukrainian army might have informed their BUK-systems in Eastern Ukraine about the overflight of an Antonov AN-26 freight carrier, which would drop goods for the troops near the Russian border. Because it was a low flying aircraft and not a civilian plane the BUK-systems had to be informed. The track of this non-existing AN-26 was equal to that of the MH17. 

Anyway, separatists likely had no information about the MH17 from themselves and would not have shot blindly on invisible airplanes crossing over their higher airspace. Furthermore, BUKs cannot be operated by amateurs and the crew probably was not drunk. If done by separatists they probably have been set up, since it all looks like a false flag.

DSB and JIT are biased and in no way compliant with scientific and legal standards to carry out an objective investigation into the MH17. This compromised the whole investigation. 

I do not support the Russians, I support the truth.






Iterative Principal Component Analysis

FOR MH17: See www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com

 Basic Dimension // April 9, 2016 at 7:43 pm //
Basic Dimension // March 26, 2016 at 11:11 am //
Basic Dimension // October 16, 2015 at 11:04 am // Reply


[Next it seems they SOMEHOW divided the 20 sample elements (n=20) into two groups of fragments. This is ABACADABRA in a scientific report.
They apparently took m=8 kind of independent variables as metal dimensions. A dependent dichotomous variable seems to indicate the difference or similarity between groups. That dependent variable could be the principal component on which groups can differ or agree. It looks like multiple regression or discriminant analysis but then not optimized because of PCA.
A number of techniques have been developed enhancing differences or similarities between groups, but sample size always influences significance in the first place.]

What could have been their design?

n= 20 subjects:

I propose they had a subject group with shrapnel in their bodies (n1=9) and a cockpit group of pieces of aluminum (n2=11). They want to know if groups differ.

They had m=8 metal variables as vectors from the origin, and might have extracted up to 8 principal components in that 8-dimensional metal space. Discarding unique factors there might remain p=2 components reducing the variable space to 2 dimensions. PCA is a form data reduction.

Now for example you may project iteratively your n=20 individuals (2 groups) from a 20-dimensional subject space into the m=8 dimensional variable space. This converges into a solution in which the n=20 individuals as vectors from the origin are plotted onto the p=2 factor space. Hence, in this iteration from subject space to variable space and back, you will find the factors in the p=2 factor space, as the reduced variable space.

So you might have n1=9 elements of shrapnel from 9 subjects and n2=11 elements from the aluminum cockpit frame. Now you project these 20 vectors onto the resulting 2-dimensional factor space. And now it is interesting if the 9 shrapnel elements from the subjects agree with the 11 pieces of aluminum of the cockpit frame. For example they agree if they score randomly on the p=2 factors. Or in the same bundle of vectors. If the 9-subject bundle scores only on the first and the 11- cockpit bundle on the second factor than groups do not match on metal.

On the other hand if there is no combined bundle and a random mess results, it also may be caused from your poor design and from too less sample elements. So only if these small groups are amazingly different on the factors it gives information. It seems they were not different, so DSB did not gain any insight.

Remember in the social sciences Principal Components Analysis is an explorative technique only meant for a lot of individual subjects n, about ten times more than the number of variables m. So we needed about 80 sample elements. But disregarding statistics it all is possible.

Hence, statistical testing is not the main purpose of PCA, only getting an idea how subjects score on the reduced metal factor space.

After this explorative analysis there are a lot of techniques to find optimal differences or optimal agreement between groups. But remember you need parameter free tests if you have very few subjects. And I think this study is only for explorative use. So if they got the idea groups were the same this is no hard evidence and other tests had to follow. But why, if they were already satisfied these groups looked the same on metal?

So they concluded groups did not differ. Can we conclude shrapnel came through the fuselage or through the windshields? No, they don’t know, for the crash site has not been guarded adequately from the beginning.


Hence now they also must prove the aluminum and zirconium in the cockpit of MH17 differ significantly from thousands of other airplanes in the world, which all can have changed their window shields. This is an impossible dead end in research.

If there is no significant difference between planes, perpetrators could have smuggled shrapnel and bow-ties from every other plane in the world.

 Deus Abscondis // April 11, 2016 at 3:13 pm //
Basic Dimension and others, thanks for the considered replies.
BD, I feel like I was propelled back to an experimental methodology class at Uni ๐Ÿ˜‚ I’ll need to read it twice❗







cc-by-nc-sa





This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.




⚠️