Thursday, 9 September 2021

NUMBER ARCHIVE

Basic Dimension






               



THE CONCLUSIVE THEORY OF 
HONOR KILLINGS


Honor Killings are caused by a distorted Reincarnation Projection. It is a failed, sick and twisted love projection that belongs in DSM-V. It is an amalgam of paraphilias.




Honor killing can technically be traced to a sick and twisted love affair based on the father's religious displeasure. Its roots lie in pedophilia and stem from the first bipedal primates. Pedophilia is a human religion that should be seen as perpetual orgasm across generations in this lifetime:




On which pedophilia evolved into perpetual orgasm in the earthly afterlife (reincarnation) and later into perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe (resurrection):










But we're not really talking about pedophilia here, because:

Assumption 241: Factors of pedophilia
Actually, real pedophilia concerns sexual interest in children without matured secondary sex characteristics. Men attracted to already quite mature girls aged 13 are no pedophiles. This is called hebephilia (see also ephebophilia and parthenophilia).

The term chronophilia was used by John Money to describe a form of paraphilia in which an individual experiences sexual attraction limited to individuals of particular age ranges.[1][2] The term has not been widely adopted by sexologists, who instead use terms that refer to the specific age range in question. An arguable historical precursor was Richard von Krafft-Ebing's concept of "age fetishism".[3]

In research environments, specific terms are used for chronophilias: for instance, ephebophilia to refer to the sexual preference for mid-to-late adolescents, hebephilia to refer to the sexual preference for earlier pubescent individuals, and pedophilia to refer to the primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children.[1][2]

Ephebophilia is used only to describe the preference for mid-to-late adolescent sexual partners, not the mere presence of some level of sexual attraction.[1] Generally, the preference is not regarded by psychologists as a pathology, as long as it does not interfere with other major areas of one's life. It is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) or the ICD-10.[2

Elsewhere:
Ephebophilia is an adult's sexual preference for adolescents. From about the age of twelve, the psychiatric boundary of pedophilia ends and ephebophilia begins. The sexual preference for maturing girls is also known as parthenophilia. The condition is that the older person with this preference has clearly transcended adolescence; he or she must be at least mid-twenties. Ephebophilia, like pedophilia, is a paraphilia; It is not entirely clear whether it also concerns a psychological disorder.



Honor syndrome:




The honor syndrome is a complex transcendental amalgam of perpetual orgasm across generations in this lifetime (hebephilia within incest) and perpetual orgasm with offspring after reincarnation, also based on inbreeding:




Note that 'perpetual orgasm' denotes the deepest sense of male religion if projected in the afterlife. In a sexual sense, males have no higher aim.

But perpetual orgasm across generations in this lifetime means that the greater the age gap between older men and younger women, the more it boosts men's sexual prestige while obscuring potential impotence

And one step further, sexual arousal in pedophilia is most promoted by the total absence of secondary sex characteristics in children. It's the biggest sexual difference imaginable besides age. In the limit one ends up with newborns. Sacrificing babies to the gods is also to boost their libido, among other things.

That's how it developed. But many other elements have since been added here, such as the mental immaturity of physically mature men.

Perpetual orgasm, however profane, therefore plays a unifying role in male sexuality through the evolution and through all transcendental stages:




Male religion is predicated on 'perpetual orgasm'. It is also reflected in popular male desires of resurrection regarding the parallel universe:





The Muslim Tragedy

Muslim culture is especially tragic because it is the heir to the multimillion-year-old incest and inbred culture of the first hominids. Desert Religions are guilty of reversing the Myth of Abraham, while ironically calling themselves "Abrahamic Religions" afterwards. They twisted Muslim culture into a system of insoluble equations. As long as Muslim culture does not properly analyze its own origins, it will not be freed from the shackles that holding reincarnation and resurrection in a cognitively dissonant stranglehold:










Why a sexual instinct is the only possible explanation for honor killings





The reincarnation instinct of Muslim fathers catches on with the sexual maturation of their daughters. It is an autonomous process that requires no communication between fathers. 
Talking about honor killings is taboo in Muslim culture, especially in rural Pakistan, where thousands of honor killings take place every year, without any communication among fathers through cultural transmission.

And if there is no cultural transfer of information, there must be a sexual instinct that is triggered at some point in time for all fathers at once by their daughters' sexual maturation. How else could it start at the same time for all Muslim fathers with this predisposition? Circular reasoning, by the way.

From the first moment of his daughter's sexual maturation, the father enters an increasingly severe psychotic stateAnd when his daughter finally refuses to marry her cousin, he ends up in a stone cold reincarnation psychosis, putting his daughter's life in grave danger.

This whole process is like an 'infatuation' that breaks down on improper grounds. It is not based on true love but on a psychological disorder of the Muslim male: tribal separation anxiety disorder. 

And for the ultimate explanation of this phenomenon, we need the eyes of the young woman. Which eyes play a decisive role in honor killings. She lets her father fall back (regress) into tribal separation anxiety mode. And according to this model, we will eventually understand honor killings:




But if this sexual instinct is transferable from father to son, a similar development takes place at the same time between the older brother and his younger sister in this amalgam of perpetual orgasm. Which means that this sexual instinct of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) has been generalized to all sexually mature males in the family. 

And then it turns out that sons in their twenties have more testosterone than their fathers and therefore will take the initiative themselves to commit honor killings, for which the father is then blamed.

So, there are more causes of honor killing than refusing the cousin:






But then it is also clear that women will not commit honor killings. The reincarnation instinct through inbreeding is not expressed in them. There is no female instinct to commit honor killings, because they have a natural aversion to inbreeding. But they are indoctrinated. They are pressured to confess the murder or else they will fall down the stairs later. They are engulfed in a whirlpool of lies. A culture of lies, deceit and cover up.


Separation Anxiety  Disorder (SAD)

Steps in general case:







Lessons from SAD:

Young men with SAD learn a lesson early in life: never fall in love until you are accepted by the girl. Rejection without being in love is harmless. But the other way around is life-threatening. So he reverses love and relationship. This strategy boils down to blind dates, serial blind dates:






Otherwise, the girl's eyes will cause him to relapse, regress into SAD and from there he can no longer escape, trapped in his propensity for suicide when she then rejects him. 






So, serial daters meet beautiful girls as in a shot gun approach, sparing their own soul. And if they are rejected, they were not in love. If they fell in love first, they could go into psychosis and worseFalling in love first would mean they unconsciously projected SAD into the girl and thereby ruined their chances and were rejected:






But a beautiful girl is not always the best choice and so he easily becomes a serial  dater. 



Steps in honor killings:





Unconscious SAD leads to honor killings:






'Teenage girl Romina Ashrafi from the northwestern city of Talesh had fallen in love with a man in his thirties and ran away after her father objected to a marriage. After returning home last week, her father beheaded her in her sleep, reportedly with a sickle. The father then reported himself to the police. Agents are said to have found the father with the bleeding murder weapon in his hand.'

'Romina Ashrafi ran away from home with her 34-year-old boyfriend after her father banned them from getting married, Arab news channel Al Jazeera reports. However, the couple was found by police five days later. Although  Romina told them she feared for her life, officers sent the teenager back home to Talesh,  a small town more than three hundred kilometers northwest of capital Tehran.'

Romina's father was unaware of his SAD and therefore could not take action. Could not disable SAD before his daughter reached sexual maturity. Could not accept reincarnation in his conscious next to resurrection. Because he didn't know to believe in reincarnation. He still doesn't know.

So he could not timely prepare himself for the coming cognitive dissonance between reincarnation and resurrection, which would cause reincarnation psychosis leading to the death of Romina.

Back with
 the time machine we see four-year-old Romina sitting on the lap of her proud father, in the family circle, a proud father though who will later kill his daughter out of love at age 14.





After killing his daughter at age 14, he knew he was wrong before the law, but he was right before his conscience. Apathetic, he sat in court in a strange world that didn't understand him, just as he didn't understand himself. He thinks he did the right thing, but how to put it into words? He slit her throat at night because she ran off with an older man against his will. Somewhere it sounded logically to him. But was that the real reason? Was that really the point? It seems so strange, because he loved her very much too. He gives up. He doesn't know and never will. The world just won't understand him.

Completely ignorant, Romina accidentally destroyed her father's unconscious afterlife projection. And now he killed her in case she would be pregnant from a hybrid, a bastard, in which offspring he would never reincarnate. Because he swears by a pure family genome:







There is only one way out for Muslim culture, one way to regain respect in the world. Muslim culture must recognize reincarnation alongside resurrection. Or pay the annual price of 5,000-20,000 honor killings. How cruel a culture can be...







Comparing both models:


Separation Anxiety Disorder (SAD) as a serious mental illness comes before rejection and thereby interferes and destroys the love process:






'Normal' separation anxiety comes after rejection and therefore does not disturb the rejection itself.










And for the ultimate explanation of this postulated phenomenon, we need the eyes of the young woman. Which eyes play a decisive role in honor killings. She lets her father fall back (regress) into tribal separation anxiety mode. And according to this model, we will eventually understand honor killings:




The process indicated above between father and daughter is a development over time that takes years. But as mentioned, there are several other one-off events leading to honor killing, but all referring to the distrust in the conservation of the family genome. For example, having an abortion or having a non-Muslim friend is a good reason for the brother to kill his sister.


Some explanation of the Muslim model:

1: 'Muslim father projects his afterlife in his daughter' is pure desperation, because unconsciously he does not believe in resurrection:




Trying to escape into his daughter's mind, he clings to her for the salvation of his soul. Unconsciously he believes in reincarnation as in the last 2 million years:








2: 'Father fears committing suicide by losing his afterlife', means if his daughter produces hybrids with non-Muslims, he also will become a hybrid after reincarnation and is never allowed to return into the tribe after his next death, which equates to suicide in the afterlife. That's why he has to kill his daughter. But he is totally unaware of his real motives:















 





It's all about morality:





Last monthly update homepage: 
September 2021.



LATEST ARTICLE: 






THIS BLOG IS ABOUT SEXUAL CULTURE, ALSO CALLED 'RELIGION'



IT CHANGES FROM POLYTHEISM (VANILLA-DYAD)

TO MONOTHEISM (SM-DYAD)


WHAT IS CALLED 'PARADIGM SHIFT'


Also known as socialist terror 
versus hedonistic democracy:













Last monthly update homepage: September 2021.





How to download this blog:










You can save this 'offline reading' on your computer and also save the information on  USB stick. But beware that flash drives deteriorate over time so you need to refresh them regularly from your computer:




SanDisks are made of aluminum as protection against EMP (Electronic Magnetic Pulse). Wrap all your USB sticks in aluminum foil as standard.





















Number Archive



INTRODUCTION ARTICLES:

GROUP PERMEABILITY IDENTIFIES RELIGIONS
(167) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 1

DEVELOPMENT AND DYNAMICS OF RELIGIOUS STAGES
(168) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 2

RELIGION AS CONTROL ON SEXUAL CULTURE
(169) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 3

GODS ARE SEXUAL ROLES
(170) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 4

POLYTHEISM, MONOTHEISM AND REPRESSIVE TOLERANCE
(171) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 5

SADOMASOCHISM, SM-DYAD AND VANILLA-DYAD
(172) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 6

'HONOR OF THE FAMILY' AND FERTILITY STRESS
(173) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 7


⚠️



(300) Q&A (Question-and-answer) [Empty]
(282) How to prevent honor killings πŸ”΄πŸ”΄
(293) Why Islam will never defeat honor killings (reincarnation)πŸ”΄πŸ”΄
(298) Omvolking Γ€r en sadomasochistic intrassling πŸ”΄πŸ”΄ [English:(294)]
(305) The cause of honor killingsπŸ”΄πŸ”΄



Foreword to this blog

(1) Foundations of Human Religion
(2) Human religion, the timelessness derivative of sexuality
(3) The Tragedy of God
(4) Human religion as operant conditioning
(5) Honor killings caused by inbreeding and incest  
(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales πŸ”΄πŸ”΄
(7) Honor killings in Islamic culture
(8) Honor killing Scenarios
(9) The Convergence Theory of Paradise
(13) The Evolution of Female Religion
(14) The Conquest of Endogamous Populations
(15) A new approach to Honor killings 
(15) Een nieuwe benadering van Eerwraak
(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam
(17) Proving other faiths as objects
(18) Islam and Christianity in Paradise
(19) The Battle of Allahs
(20) Islam, the Red Giant
(21) The Basic Dimension of Religion
(22) Antipodal Religions in Basic Dimension 
(23) Counter-cyclical cultures in Basic Dimension
(24) Crumbling Islam lost tribal identity
(25) Honor killings in short
(26) Religions identified by group permeability
(27) Thou shalt propagate in genetic diversity
(28) The Key to Human Religion (Part 1) [Mammals]
(29) The Key to Human Religion (Part 2) [Homininae]
(30) The Key to Human Religion (Part 3) [Homo erectus]
(31) The Key to Human Religion (part 4) [Homo sapiens]
(32) The Archetype of God
(33) Chrislam, God of Policor
(34) Freedom of Speech 
πŸ”΄[Drawings prophet Mohammed]
(35) Religion and endogamy
(36) Non-sexual religion in Basic Dimension
(37) The Timelessness of Endogamy
(38) Killing Honor
(39) Killing Honor by fading Perpetual Orgasm
(40) Perpetual Orgasm, the Fourth God
(41) Pedophilia, crowbar in human religion
(42) The Split in Panini Religion
(43) The Incest Inbreeding Compensation Model
(44) The Evolution of Pedophilia
(45) Selective breeding with Homininae
(46) The Schengen Necrology of European Culture
(47) The Curse of Enlightenment
(48) Federica Mogherini's lustful submission to Chrislam πŸ”΄πŸ”΄
(49) The Fatal Flaw in Islam
(50) The Cause of Chrislam
(51) Women's emancipation causes Chrislam
(52) Space-time, wormhole to God for primitive man
(53) Space-time for Hominids
(54) Roots of racism
(55) The time derivative of sexual culture
(56) Homo orgasmus
(57) Chrislamic orgasm πŸ”΄
(58) Homo naledi: Antedating Human Religion
(59) The Killer Hominid

List of assumptions by number:

(73) The Sexual Theory of Religion  (Part 1: 1-59)
(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)
(75) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 3: 120-400)
(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 400-600)πŸ”΄πŸ”΄πŸ”΄

(77) Homo naledi from rebirth to reincarnation 
(78) Roaming led to bonobo religion
(79) Sexual crisis in Islam
(80) Why gay people must be sick
(81) The future of Islam
(82) Political correctness as sexual disorder
(87) The blessing of multiculturalism

(88) The Alpha Male of Dutch Parliament

(89) Marital rape
(90) Policor, the new religion
(91) Why Muslims kill homosexuals
Blogger Help Forum, Blogspot is adding extra lines with every update
(92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught
(93) Christianity lost SM-dyad
(94) Rape and murder distinguish between religions πŸ”΄
(95) Policor fears the white elephant
(96) Mitochondrial DNA males and females
(97) The Alpha male started inbreeding and incest
(98) Inheritance patterns
(99) Breaking sadomasochism
(100) The insatiable serial killer
(101) Femdomized Western culture
(102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom 
(103) Infanticide proves genetic immortality
(104) Genetic immortality and perpetual orgasm
(105) Western Europe, Muslim Paradise on Earth
(106) Concealed ovulation
(107) Homo naledi: The sum of its parts
(108) Homo naledi: The sticks and lianas theoryπŸ”΄
(109) Homo naledi and the Underworld 
(110) Homo naledi as inbreeding culture
(111) Homo naledi: Finding Rebirth Graveyards
(148) Paradise Myth will cause WWIII
(149) Overflow of the inbreeding instinct

(150) Amsterdam Post, 5 october 2012 (Van Frikschoten)
(151) The Muslim incrowd syndrome
(152) The Islamic thermometer
(153) Differential regression of the Muslim culture
(154) Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.)
(155) The Melania Trump effect
(156) Coefficient of Relationship (C.O.R.)
(157) The schism of policor
(158) Dynamics of religion
(159) Proof belief of earthly reincarnation into descendants
(160) Breakthrough in honor killings πŸ”΄⚠️
(161) Grandpa, please come into my womb 
(162) Muslim 'honor' signifies fertility stress
(163) The Muslim fertility obsession
(164) Ancestors are hybrid god projections
(165) Tragedy: The battle of gods from Adam and Eve
(166) Religious terror from the German Government
(167) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 1
(168) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 2
(169) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 3
(170) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 4
(173) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 7
(180) Homosexuality and fertility stress
(181) Intermittent reinforcement of religion
(182) The Swedish Act With Ass Up
(183) Islam looks like an autosomal recessive disorder
(184) The Muslim autosomal recessive disorder syndrome
(185) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 1
(186) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 2
(187) Yin and Yang in policor
(188) The race of anti-policor to salvation
(189) Policor, the decadent society
(190) Australopithecus interbred with Homo sapiens?
(191) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 3⚠️
(192) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 4
(193) Masochism love, hate and fear πŸ”΄
(194) The twist in the Muslim instinct

HOMEPAGE:


Basic Dimension




(412) To The American People (about racism)








US upgrade 'Basic Models of Racism'


Preface:

It is clear that the process of human racism can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. 

Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integration, assimilation and segregation. It is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. Their biggest problem with racism is identity politics, which is the resulting meaning of racism:

Assumption 627: Identity politics:
Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religionracesocial backgroundclass or other identifying factor develop political agendas based around one or more of these categories.

Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Racism is part of identity politics.

The first bipedal primates assumed that the appearance of individuals of a certain subspecies could be equated with their (deviating) tribal identity. Therefore, they easily confused the individual with his group based on external features.

 




Basic Models of racism:

1: The Native-Immigrant Model (Mod 1:NI)

In the Native-Immigrant model different races or ethnicities compete for the same land. This model follows a mutual racist-racist model, called a sadist-sadist relationship
The ultimate result of this armed peace might be the integration of groups.

- The evolutionary goal of racism is to manage conflict on an individual level to prevent intergroup civil wars.

Assumption 623: The intent of Racism.
Racism tries to achieve symbolic balance between cultures, between tribal identities, bringing races or ethnicities into the cultural harmony of integration and assimilation. And of course those are almost always unpleasant corrections from both sides.


Native-Immigrant Model (Mod 1:NI)

In our model of racism, we started with the Native-Immigrant Model as the standard method of how human populations integrate in the evolution. 

In (Mod 1:NI), both groups are racist to arrive at integration and assimilation:




Assumption 626: Racial weights: Tribal identities between cultures must be harmonized for integration towards assimilation. This is achieved through the racial weight of one's own culture on the tribal identity of the other.











The attempted extermination of Native Americans in America was systemic racism of Western immigrants. Even not verbally articulated, it was an ideological goal in itself.






2: The Master-Slave Model (Mod 2:MS)

The Master-Slave model shows a sado-masochistic relationship between master and slave. In this, the slave race or ethnicity is incapable of defending itself against the master. It is the racist-antiracist model. This model always falls apart eventually.







One-sided assimilation from Black into White:

When racial weights are absent, assimilation between groups may have already taken place. But there can also be segregation through parallel societies. Finally, there may be forced one-sided assimilation of the Slave-race into the Master-race (see ADDENDUM).

The Racism Factor

Mutual Assimilation means corresponding tribal identities (No racism).
One sided Assimilation means partly cultural surrender (Racism possible).
- Integration means balanced by racism, without equal tribal identities.
- Segregation means no longer racism.
Civil war means no segregation any more.
Assumption 636: Auxiliary hypothesis:
The Black-race is intrinsically non-racist and anti-racist in politics.

If slaves are not racist by nature, they deliberately don't put racial weight on the master race and their color is pink:





After slavery, this dependency relationship in the US has been partly continued in a unilateral assimilation from Black Into White:
Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)
x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)
a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

This raises the question of how far slavery uses to reflect a "natural" relationship. Blacks were misused in slavery but part of them still conform to the Master-Slave relationship from the slavery period. They continue on the same basis as in (Mod 2:MS) and carry the racist burden of the Master culture until the present day:



Refusal one-sided assimilation from Black into White:

But another part of the Black race went back to (Mod 1:NI), while stalled functionally fixed in (Mod 2:MS). And from (Mod 1:NI) this process disintegrated into (Mod 3:CS). Note they could not effectively defend themselves with racism in (Mod 1:NIand remained functionally fixated in anti-racismThey simply avoided whites and established parallel inner cities in the South.

Note: There are two groups that reject unilateral assimilation into white culture. Above is about black people in the South. But part of the Mixed-race is also against unilateral assimilation for political reasons. But the Mixed-race does not end up immediately in Cultural segregation (Mod 3:CS).

Assumption 636: Auxiliary hypothesis:
The Black-race is intrinsically non-racist and anti-racist in politics.

3: The Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS)



As a result of (Mod 3:CS), concepts as 'Racism' and 'Anti-Racism' became meaningless because races no longer interacted:



The Cultural Segregation model is a combination of the Master-Slave model and the Native-Immigrant model after slaves became free. In this combined model, slaves did not integrate further into the master culture after liberation, but disintegrated into segregation in inner cities in the South:



So, in case Slave and Master did not interact after slavery, their integration process stalled in (Mod 2:MS), which otherwise could have evolved into the general sadist-sadist mode of (Mod 1:NI). But it failed. 
The process stalled in disintegration before segregation:



Mutual assimilation from Black and White:

Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolved into symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model (Mod 4m:MCI):


 

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Balanced by mutual racism)




4: The Mutual Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4m:MCI)

(Mod 4m:MCI) could have been the follow up model of (Mod 1:NI), but not easily of (Mod 2:MS)unless the functionally fixed relationship from (Mod 2:MS) changed into the satisfying cultural equation for integration between Master and Slave culture (Mod 1:NI), which ultimately could evolve into a mutual assimilation, which is rather doubtful:



So, in above models we do not really expect a fundamental behavioral change from the Black-race. More obvious is the one-sided assimilation of the Black race into the Master race by (Mod 4u:UCI):



Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity(Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)










The auxiliary hypothesis

Proceeding with our model, we need the auxiliary hypothesis that this kind of slavery is not accidental but sort of a natural relationship. In history, Blacks have been in slavery for ages at Caucasians, at Muslims and Europeans. 

Only if slavery was felt as kind of natural relationship this prolonged dependency on the Master culture after slavery can be understood, because so many other peoples in the evolution have fallen for slavery but recovered their original tribal identities afterwards, I guess. Regardless, there seems to be a mutually beneficial symbiosis between black and white. Based on the economy, stupid.

And only if the black race - as auxiliary hypothesis - does not defend itself against Western culture, e.g. because it has an economic interest in doing so, is there room for a counter-reaction from the right side of the mixed race, which, as almost white, is still discriminated against on facial features:



The whiter part of the Mixed-race doesn't have this fatalistic and lethargic attitude of the pure Black race. This 'docile' attitude is an abomination to them. So, they go to war against the other Whites with shit arguments about White Supremacy and the like:

'No one is born racist or antiracist; these result from the choices we make. Being antiracist results from a conscious decision to make frequent, consistent, equitable choices daily. These choices require ongoing self-awareness and self-reflection as we move through life. In the absence of making antiracist choices, we (un)consciously uphold aspects of white supremacywhite-dominant culture, and unequal institutions and society. Being racist or antiracist is not about who you are; it is about what you do.'

Above sentences seem completely contrary to the premise of 'No one is born racist or antiracist'. We apparently have to walk all our life through a minefield of difficult choices. Why is that? Why would the author not warn white males for their awful racist instinctTo hide their racist heritage is the first elephant in the room. And the function appears to be to shock white males and let individuals discover in horror these abject feelings as their personal abnormality, as a disgusting aberration. White males are not normal people like us. And that's an unfair intro. 




So, now we have the auxiliary hypothesis by which political gangs can drive a wedge between unilateral assimilators (Blacks) and refusers (partly Mixed-race).

It does not matter whether the auxiliary hypothesis is correct. What matters is a good description of the State of Nature and making predictions about the future behavior of the Mixed-race and political gangs.




THE MIXED RACE:








This is why it went wrong in the US: It took to long to come to integration and assimilation:

It is clear that the process of human racism can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. 

Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integration, assimilation and segregation. It is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. Their biggest problem from racism is identity politics, which is the resulting meaning of racism.

The second problem generated by identity politics is to take no personal responsibility for life and to demand equality of outcome which ruins every society, instead of equality of opportunity which removes racism in the long run.

With racial cooperation bogged down in a one-sided assimilation of Black in White, which is the best solution, by the way, political gangs have come to grips with the integration process and are doing everything they can to bring about segregation and civil war:

5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Insincere Anti-Racism model is developed out of the former Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS), and nested in the general Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI)In this model a more or less undefined political actor takes the lead while invoking systemic anti-racism as ideology and confirming former slaves in the injustice that has been done to them, and fair enough, but at the same time inciting the public into counter-racism through outright aggression against the former Master race or ethnicity. And that's at odds with the anti-racism of their core ideology. This is not a fruitful path to integration, if that was the intention. But then, what is their intention? That's the question.




Many times in the evolution tensions between races or ethnicities have been hijacked by political gangs that took advantage of a hopeless stalemate between parties by expulsion or massacre of one of the parties. So, it is not especially the Master-Slave model (Mod 2:MS), which is the victim of external powers, but any hopeless situation can seduce a third party to incite civil war.

Well, racism-racism is exactly where (Mod 1:NI) is for, so counter-racism is not bad in principle, but certainly by honestly informing the people that they will be provoked into the right direction of counter-racism under the heading of anti-racism. That would be ethical and sincere.

And it must be said (Mod 1:NI) is intended to achieve integration and better not to segregate. "Anti-racism" of pushing agencies thus abuses the functional fixedness of the former sado-masochistic relationship in (Mod 2:MS)which has since evolved into a sadist-sadist environment through the liberation of the slaves (Mod 1:NI)

Thus, anti-racism (Mod 5: IAR) interferes with the functional fixed racist-antiracist relationship nested in the racist-racist model (Mod 1:NI).

'Anti-racism' of (Mod 5: IAR) is therefore in parasitic symbiosis with the racist-racist model of (Mod 1:NI). The aim of this kind of anti-racism is to claim endless penance for the past and at the same time to aggressively demand more and more privileges without consideration. In effect, citizens are being held hostage by a misunderstood external source. It must be emphasized that there is of course also genuine anti-racism.

So, insincere anti-racism is initiated by an outside party with an interest in breaking the status quo, where natural integration is not obvious given the nature of parties to the conflict.

But as said before, Model (Mod 2:MS) could have found some sort of assimilation of the slave culture into the master culture. Then the real meaning of (Mod 5: IAR) would be to disrupt assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war.

Resume: The insincerity is that the external party does not really pursue anti-racism but outright aggression and counter-racism. They only sell their message this way. And in principle counter-racism would be no problem in (Mod 1:NI) if former slaves understood the real intention. However, the intention looks to worsen the relationship from Cultural Segregation (Mod 3:CS) to (Mod 5: IAR) by pretending to aim at (Mod 4:CI)Another option is (Mod 5: IAR) could intend to disrupt assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war. In any case, it is risky to drag a group into an adventure that the majority apparently does not aspire to.


George Orwell: Animal Farm 1984:




The problem is that part of the mixed race has more white DNA than black, dependent on successive mingling:




They clearly cannot accept the racist treatment of Whites towards Blacks, which has become standard in American culture. 




Although possibly only 20% of the Mixed-race is more white than black, they try desperately to identify with blacks in order to turn the black community against whites:




They hinder unilateral assimilation by removing the white racist burden on the black scale and in the rebound inventing an entirely new postmodernist dogma of white male supremacy in power-driven hierarchies, placed on the whites' plate, making integration equilibrium impossible:




Their barely unconscious aim is to destabilize American society and plunge the country into misfortune:








General Model:


3: The Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS)

The Cultural Segregation model can be a combination of the Master-Slave model and the Native-Immigrant model after slaves became free. In this combined model, slaves do not integrate further into the master culture after liberation. 

Slave and Master remain functionally fixed in their former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS), which was expected to evolve into the general sadist-sadist mode of (Mod 1:NI). But it failed. This process possibly stalls in disintegration before segregation.




Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolves in mutual symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model  (Mod 4:CI)But this model will eventually disappear into the Mixed Race variant:


4: The General Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI)

(Mod 4:CI) can be the follow up model of (Mod 1:NI), but not easily of (Mod 2:MS)unless the functionally fixed relationship from (Mod 2:MS) becomes the satisfying  cultural equation for integration between Master and Slave culture, which ultimately could evolve into mutual assimilation, which is rather doubtful:





MODEL ADAPTATIONS FOR THE US:

Mutual assimilation from Black and White (US version):

Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolved in symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model (Mod 4m:MCI). Very unlikely for the US because Blacks now will have to defend their tribal identity with racism. Black and White need racism in this model:




One-sided assimilation from Black into White:




The predator model: Political Gangs:



5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Insincere Anti-Racism model is nested in the general Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI). In this model (Mod 5: IAR), there is a more or less undefined political actor (GA), which takes the lead while invoking systemic anti-racism as ideology and confirming former slaves (SL) and Mixed Race (MR) in the injustice that has been done to them, and fair enough, but at the same time inciting the public into counter-racism through outright aggression against the former Master race or ethnicity (MA). This is not peaceful anti-racism, but malicious and highly aggressive racism, which wouldn't be a problem if it was frankly spoken.

And that's at odds with the so called "anti-racism" of the core ideology of the Gang (GA). This is not a fruitful path to integration, if that was the intention. But then, what is their intention? That's the question.



















ADDENDUM:

The Racism Factor

Mutual Assimilation means corresponding tribal identities (No racism).
One sided Assimilation means partly cultural surrender (Racism possible).
- Integration means balanced by racism, without equal tribal identities.
- Segregation means no longer racism.
Civil war means no segregation any more.


Integration starts with mismatched tribal identities:

When Slave tribal identity and Master identity do not fit:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)
x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)
a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)

(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (1 x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Slaves have no problems with Master identity.

x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)

(1 x Slave identity) = (R(Sl) x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Master has no no problems with Slave identity.

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (R(SL) x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Both parties have problems with the other culture.


Assimilation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Mutual assimilation means matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism factor is 1 at both sides:

1 x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity.
      Slave identity = Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity match when RF = 1 for both sides:
(1 x) Slave identity corresponds to (1 x) Master identity, (No racism, 
assimilation achieved).

Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity(Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)
x Slave identity = b x Master identity, (Balanced one sided racism: b = Slave racism)
a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Balanced by mutual racism)


Segregation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Segregation also means not matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism Factor is 1 on both sides, by definition for this inequality:

1 x Slave identit 1 x Master identity.
      Slave identity  Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity don't match with segregation.





Basic Dimension





White supremacy male hierarchies

Postmodernists state that male hierarchies are oppressive patriarchies based on tyrannical power (toxic masculinity) and not on substantive matters and intellectual qualities. But there are also increasingly female based hierarchies, as general practitioner medicine, nursing, primary education, humanities and social sciences. These are based on the same "toxic" structures and that falsifies 'only male driven power hierarchies'. And so, wrong theories cannot stand forever, although this one is simple falsified. It is not about males and not about white males especially.

Next we fill in Orwell's 1984 to frame racist narratives from political gangs in the right way:

1: White male supremacists are the farmers. Their power hierarchy seems not to be based on knowledge of the subject matter. But just as in Rhodesia and South Africa, the animals of the Animal Farm thought to be able to do it much better and that their power drive was the only necessary quality. And we know how that ruined their economies to the core.

2: The Greatest Common Divisor of conspiracy gangs is that they are power driven
instruments themselves to destroy Western culture. They are the pigs that are against white male supremacy only to drag the black race into civil war.

3: Because they simply want to take over power to terrorize the other animals of the farm.

4: And so, they 'favored' the Black race with mass abortions that has reduced their group with already 13 million people. And they also gave state aid to single mothers, what effectively ruined their nuclear families. 

5: So, with the end result of millions of single mothers and many criminals added, there is not much left from the once so proud peoples of Africa. How did this happen? Well, in the rebound, pigs have made the Slave-race to slaves again. And the blacks, they did not notice. They loved to be seduced with fairy tales about a better life, according to their voting behavior. That's exactly what the pigs promised the other animals in 1984 too. And now, they promise positive discrimination and houses as compensation for slavery.

6: What we see is that equality of outcome is preferred above equality of opportunity. The Black community seems to prefer chasing cheap happiness above taking responsibility for the future of their kids. So, they apparently opt for the easy way of least resistanceOf course, this framing comes from political gangs. 

7: And yet, life means fighting malevolence with character, easy life is unstable and the bill comes later. Do like Jews, Chinese and South Koreans and offer your children a balanced family structure, in which kids are encouraged to learn a profession, because children strive to what looks important to the family, to thoroughly master a profession with status. 

That's why Einstein ended in mathematics, that's why they all end in the STEM-fields: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math, Including Computer Science. It's not all intelligence, it is also how you push your children from the start into the right direction to develop intellectual status and self esteem. But without family support, children are already lost in the early school years. Anyways, a scientific education will later be much more difficult to obtain. If that's the objective. That's how the hares running from the start.


One sided assimilation

But in some way political gangs are right, because unilateral assimilation is not ideal, though in principle it works:



But left radicals block one-sided assimilation without alternative:



Political gangs discovered that unilateral assimilation is not accepted by the whiter part of the Mixed-race, which now works together with the pigs to ruin the US economy, to cancel Western identity. That is the problem:



The Black race is blackmailed and became the instrument of Postmodernists to eliminate Western culture from North America. Why? Because Christianity is in its end stage of polytheistic development. It is not in the picture, but it is reality:




Human religions are functions of former religions and breeding is the crucial dimension:




Also known as socialist terror versus hedonistic democracy:





Western culture will die blindfolded





Watch out, The United States are on the tipping point from Polytheism to Monotheism, from Political Correctness to Postmodernism, from Vanilla-Dyad to SM-Dyad, from Me Too Movement to Hollywood. The same does happen in the EU. This sexual world revolution would bring about a catastrophe where the atrocities of the 20th centuries fade away. 

For example: Currently in time, August 2021, Americans flee from Afghanistan in a mini Paradigm Shift from Polytheism back to Monotheism. Also here again we see the
sadomasochistic entanglement in the lustful killing of countless victims. Again and again in the evolution. We don't even notice.  

But is this disorderly retreat by Americans an incident, an accident? Really? Why this question, for ultra left postmodernists knew what was coming. Reasons do not matter, it is the shift showing up time and again. There must be an underlying lust behind these rationalizations.

The Taliban is against Western culture through sexual ideology. Postmodernists in the Government of Biden are also against Western culture by neo-Marxism. They work together, consciously or unconsciously.

We saw the same repetition of moves between Obama and the Mullahs from Iran. Both did not like Western culture. Both, The Mixed-Race and Islam pursue the downfall of Western society. It's so obvious, the collaboration from Postmodernism with Monotheistic terror.

This paradigm shift is the transition between polytheism and monotheism. It is the core mechanism tilting bipedal primate religion for already 14 million years, ranging between SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad. Countless vortexes appear in the evolution, large and small, we look at it without seeing:





It is the political left blackmailing the black community. They want them to be apathetic and dependent on the pigs, which are selfish and materialistic. 'Lack of morality' was too obvious to place in above picture. Pigs do not really care about the Black race, don't feel any empathy, since they are fighting (fading) Christianity on their way to the new ruler in Postmodernist cruelty:



And this explains the real care and real empathy of Trump with the black community. He is from Old Christianity, which has not yet fallen for Political Correctness, which latter is heir to faded Christianity without God. It has been written on this blog that Old Christianity is to be found in the Plains and the Rust Belt and in Eastern Europe where the Orthodox Church had to fight the atrocities of communism. So the old Christian church has been preserved in Eastern Europe. Don't know how long it will be maintained:








The risk of stopping racism:

We remember what happens if groups do not place racial weights on each others scale any longer. Then we end up in assimilation or segregation. Well, assimilation is already impossible in the US and thus only segregation rests:



 

The Racism Factor

Mutual Assimilation means corresponding tribal identities (No racism).
One sided Assimilation means partly cultural surrender (Racism possible).
- Integration means balanced by racism, without equal tribal identities.
- Segregation means no longer racism.
Civil war means no segregation any more.
 

 


 

So, the Mixed-race in the US and the Muslim population in Europe will go further as parallel societies. This happens already in all big cities of Europe. But the problem with the US is that the Mixed-race is not a balanced and converged race but a running continuum from Black to White. 

In the future, their members will more and more lose confidence in their original races, Black or White. They are alienated and will not develop a 'Mixed-race' identity eitherThey will never form a tribe, because different features is what binds them. The Mixed-race is a textbook example of the anti-tribe. A ghost tribe from a horrible experiment: The Melting Pot of the United States. An irresponsible experiment to flatten 14 Million years of evolution. An experiment without any guaranty on success has failed miserably.

And failure to assimilation is also the objective of the pigs, in which the Mixed-race must be scattered over all inhabitants of the States, with the peculiarity of no common identity

But then segregation will be impossible, because members from the Mixed-race do not have common facial features, what means they never form an identical tribe. Racism? Maybe, but that's how it is.

So, the US will never form an assimilation and will never develop segregation between the Mixed-race and the rest. The only remaining prospective is civil war because of no segregation:




And that's exactly what the pigs want, no segregation but civil war to destroy Western culture.

And because the Mixed-race, which might become the largest but scattered community in the long term, has no identity, their members will stay individuals. This means they do not worship God anymore and do not acknowledge among themselves the same dimension of good and evil. So, they all will have different ethical values.

This racial mingling will complement the individualism of the end stage of Christianity. Anyways, this country will stop to be a political entity, stop to be a homogeneous people, stop to be a world player, simply as a matter of time. 

And maybe, they will manage to eradicate the White-race, but they will also lose any coherence, any confidence in each other, they will become just like nowadays ultra left liberals in Congress, a pack of hyenas without any overarching morality. It will become the end of civilization in North America, with an explosion of poverty alike third world countries.

But long before the hypothetical overcrowding of the Mixed-race, a number of civil wars will happen. And these wars will redefine the political landscape fundamentally. Best advice to ultra left politicians, don't do it because you will lose everything.

For segregation we need identifiable ethnicities or races. With Muslims in Europe that's the case and civil war can be postponed, but with the Mixed-race in the US it is not. Because segregation is no option. But then the only thing left is looting and arson culminating in Civil War:






ADDENDUM:

The Racism Factor

Mutual Assimilation means corresponding tribal identities (No racism).
One sided Assimilation means partly cultural surrender (Racism possible).
- Integration means balanced by racism, without equal tribal identities.
- Segregation means no longer racism.
Civil war means no segregation any more.


Integration starts with mismatched tribal identities:

When Slave tribal identity and Master identity do not fit:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)
x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)
a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)

(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (1 x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Slaves have no problems with Master identity.

x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)

(1 x Slave identity) = (R(Sl) x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Master has no no problems with Slave identity.

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (R(SL) x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Both parties have problems with the other culture.


Assimilation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Mutual assimilation means matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism factor is 1 at both sides:

1 x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity.
      Slave identity = Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity match when RF = 1 for both sides:
(1 x) Slave identity corresponds to (1 x) Master identity, (No racism, 
assimilation achieved).

Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity(Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)
x Slave identity = b x Master identity, (Balanced one sided racism: b = Slave racism)
a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Balanced by mutual racism)


Segregation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Segregation also means not matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism Factor is 1 on both sides, by definition for this inequality:

1 x Slave identit 1 x Master identity.
      Slave identity  Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity don't match with segregation.





Basic Dimension




(410) The Mixed-race assimilation paradox

 

Between Black and White exists some kind of complementary understanding of organizing society. There are countless examples of their collaboration that brings society prosperity:




That is why at least part of the black population is unilaterally assimilated into white society after lifting slaveryAnd that assimilation is maintained as a forced one-sided assimilation by the Master-race, complete with a master racial weight. Blacks do not place (much) racial weight on Whites. I don't want to imagine the situation better than it is:




Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

Racism equation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity(Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)

This assimilation is not true for the whole of the black population. But anyways, there seems to be natural complementary elements in the collaboration between black and white. Not everywhere, but it exists. And this situation of unilateral assimilation from Black in White is paradoxically also the cause of the failure of assimilation of the Mixed-race into the Master-race. These are opposing effects. Again not everywhere, but definitely at critical places in politics. That is the theory described here:



Mixed-race will not find easily its tribal identity:

Expected situation:

Derived situation in politics:



Mixed-race as trigger for destruction of the United States

It is not that people of African-American descent mixed with Caucasians will be the cause of the downfall of the United States, but they are the reason for uncoordinated action of third parties on a large scale to destroy the American DreamThrough the assimilation paradox they try to drive a wedge between the Black community. Their ultimate goal is to encourage dissatisfied African-Americans to rebel against the status quo of current society:





American racism cannot be understood without the Paradigm Shift to a sadomasochistic entanglement:

The interaction between racism and the paradigm shift: But as mentioned earlier, we previously missed an important intervening variable. It is not true that the Mixed-race with more Master-race DNA identifies better with the Master culture:

In the US two processes occur at the same time: 
The Paradigm Shift from Polytheism to Monotheism and nested within this shift the racist relationship between Slave-race and Master-race.

So, it is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in their paradigm shift.

Maybe the American public thinks it's all about racism, but political gangs have a different objective, although I doubt whether they know what they are doing.

And the 'proof' is that the same paradigm shift in Europe takes place without racism, because Muslims are welcomed in Europe by PC (see below).

So, it seems that it is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in a coming paradigm shift of sadomasochistic entanglement that ends in a whirlpool of sexual lust.

This paradigm shift is the transition between polytheism and monotheism. It is the core mechanism tilting bipedal primate religions for already 14 million years, ranging between SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad. Countless vortexes appear in the evolution, large and small, we look at it without seeing:




So, this postulated paradigm shift would not have much credibility, be it that it is akin to the bipedal species for already 14 million years, another speculation...


Human religions are functions of former religions and breeding is the crucial dimension:






For example: Currently in time, August 2021, Americans flee from Afghanistan in a mini Paradigm Shift from Polytheism back to Monotheism. Also here again we see the
sadomasochistic entanglement in the lustful killing of countless victims. Again and again in the evolution. We don't even notice.  

But this disorderly retreat by Americans must be seen as an incident, an accident. Really? Why this question, for ultra left postmodernists knew what was coming. BTW, reasons do not matter, it is the shift showing up time and again. There must be an underlying lust behind these rationalizations.

The Taliban is against Western culture through sexual ideology. Postmodernists in the Government of Biden are also against Western culture by neo-Marxism. They work together, consciously or unconsciously.

We saw the same repetition of moves between Obama and the Mullahs from Iran. Both did not like Western culture. Both, The Mixed-Race and Islam pursue the downfall of Western society. It's so obvious, the collaboration from Postmodernism with Monotheistic terror.



The Bipedal Paradigm Shift
















The  paradigm shift in Europe:


Actually the Paradigm Shift started with the Enlightenment, hundreds of years ago, what caused the end of Christianity. But all these movements including Marxism were not the cause, but outer signs of an inherent development within polytheism itself. So, the Enlightenment, Marxism, neo-Marxism and Multiculturalism are accompanying phenomena of fading Christianity. Apart from the Enlightenment they have no inherent significance.

So, the end time of Christianity started with the Enlightenment and accelerated with the onset of the Frankfurter Schule in the 1930s. Neo-Marxism of the 60s of last century was implied as well. But all these movements, such as multiculturalism in Europe, were of little significance. They were relatively irrelevant accompanying phenomena of the paradigm shift to monotheism. 

And so is postmodernism, what is an illogical twist from Marxism back to monotheistic terrorIllogical because it rejects any cultural law except the power theory about male hierarchies of white supremacy. Furthermore, it is racist:
Assumption 627: Identity politics:
Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religionracesocial backgroundclass or other identifying factor develop political agendas based around one or more of these categories.

Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Racism is part of identity politics.

The first bipedal primates assumed that the appearance of individuals of a certain subspecies could be equated with their (deviating) tribal identity. Therefore, they easily confused the individual with his group based on external features.
So, on the way to its final phase of individualism, also called 'democracy' in politics, this transition to monotheism has been going on for hundreds of years.

We conclude that individualism is the solution of Western culture for tribalism, but it is a very unstable solution to lose group identity at the end. And we could understand individuality as individuals who first identified themselves with their support groups, but that is wishful thinking, because most individualists turn off from any group. Because they do not choose for individualism in the first place, but are just products of a huge evolutionary correction.

That's how it went around:


So, what really happens is that Christianity as polytheism fades into individualism, after which a monotheistic terror takeover will take place. That's the main law of bipedal evolution. And as political correctness is the messenger of dying Christianity in individualism, so postmodernism is the devil in disguise of identity politics from monotheistic racism:






How things are connected:

Inbreeding vs Outbreeding.
Monotheism vs Polytheism.
Collectivism vs Individualism.
SM-dyad vs Vanilla-dyad.
Postmodernism vs Political Correctness.




Individualism means banning God as the monotheistic tyrant from the red core.




But then masochism searches for new sadism as direction in space to complete its sexual lust:





And both Europe and the US are in the same process to find a new master:



Europe:


The United States:


It is the same process for already 14 millions years:






SPLITTING UP THE NATION

1: People from the Mixed-race have great difficulty identifying with their original Slave or Master-race. Identification in the middle - with equally matched DNA - is theoretically the most difficult for them. Although phenotype can be the decisive factor:




2: The Mixed-race is a hybrid between Black and White, between Africans and Caucasians. Apparently, these races are so far apart that the Mixed-race cannot easily converge to a new tribal identity:




3: After termination of slavery, the relationship largely stabilized in unilateral assimilation of former slaves into the master culture. Apparently, Caucasians and African-Americans found a way of life suitable for both parties, but that may be an unsubstantiated conclusion:




The Mixed-race again:




But as mentioned earlier, we previously missed an important intervening variableIt is not true that the Mixed-race with more Master-race DNA identifies better with the Master culture:




They definitely don't because the Master culture discriminates them as much as the other African-Americans.




Though they are sometimes as white as the White-race, they still have some African-American features, which triggers discriminatory remarks. As a result, they are hyper sensitive for 'wrong remarks' and despise the Master-race as tribal identity:




And that is quite understandable, fair enough. They have almost the same genes as the Master-race and wish to be treated equally. So, they obstruct the one-sided assimilation of African-Americans in the Master-race. They sometimes come to hate the White-race and call them 'White Supremacists':







And although they don't look much like African Americans any more, they try to identify themselves with them, what is not always credible. What we conclude is that the Mixed-race as a group will not find its tribal identity easily. 

And the more their DNA on the right side shifts to the White-race by interbreeding, the less credible will be their pretended 'African-American' identity. And that means that Mixed-race activists cannot converge to a new tribal identity on the right side, without losing African-Americans on the left in their ideological fight against the White-race.

And that means also that the longer they are waiting with a civil war, the more unlikely this can be won. But anyways, a civil war against 'white supremacists' is a Fata Morgana, due to other complications, which will be treated in the following articles.

Another complication is the size and complexity of populations to be mixed. Things are different from millions of years ago. Where in the evolution two finite groups ultimately completely mixed and created a new tribal identity, it is now no longer possible by infinite scaling up. 

So, the 'melting-pot society' has failed and will not converge at all into a new and overall American Identity, where The Flag and the American Dream also are losing symbolical value. 

It has been too easily assumed that the endless mixing of races and ethnicities will result into new tribal identities. The opposite seems to happen where groups will continue to distinguish themselves in all possible ways, as is common in the Fashion Industry. 

Then, ultimately the Nation will collapse into individualism, what means the end game of Christianity, from Polytheism on its way to Postmodernism and monotheistic terror. And therefore the US can forget about total assimilation. It will never happen. Poor integration is the highest feasible. And so we must fear failed integration processes to end in permanent racism. This because it cannot be completed into assimilation:

It is clear that the process of human racism can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integrationassimilation and segregationIt is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. The biggest problem of racism is identity politics, which is the resulting meaning of racism. The second problem generated by identity politics is to take no personal responsibility for life and to demand equality of outcome which ruins every society, instead of equality of opportunity which removes racism in the long run.





Basic Dimension

(409) Paradigm Shift interferes with Racism





Racism nested in Paradigm Shift:

The paradigm shift has already been treated in (407) and is important for Europe, where former masochistic Christians suck up the sadistic Muslim culture. In Europe there is no extreme racism:




But in the US we have to deal with racism with regard to the forced imported African-American population. And tens of millions of Muslims were not begged to immigrate into the US:


Therefore, in the US one has to deal with an interaction between racism and paradigm shift. So, I realized that racism in the US cannot be properly understood, except combined with the paradigm shift from Europe, more precise from bipedal evolution. And therefore I dedicate a separate article to this interaction in the US:

The interaction between racism and the paradigm shift:

In the US two processes occur at the same time: The Paradigm Shift from Polytheism to Monotheism and nested within this shift the racist relationship between The Slave Race and The Master Race.

The American public may think that all this is about racism, but political gangs have a different goal lying in the paradigm shift, although I doubt whether they know what they are doing.

So, it is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in a paradigm shift.

And the 'proof' is that the same process in Europe takes place without racism, because Muslims are welcomed in Europe by PC.

It is important to pay attention to the theory around the Paradigm Shift:





But actually this Paradigm Shift started with the Enlightenment, hundreds of years ago what caused the end of Christianity. But all these movements including Marxism were not the cause, but outer signs of an inherent development within polytheism itself. So, the Enlightenment, Marxism, neo-Marxism and Multiculturalism are accompanying phenomena of fading Christianity. Apart from the Enlightenment they have no inherent significance.

So, the end time of Christianity started with the Enlightenment and accelerated with the onset of the Frankfurter Schule in the 1930s. Neo-Marxism of the 60s of last century was implied. But all these movements, such as multiculturalism in Europe, were of little significance. They were relatively irrelevant accompanying phenomena of the paradigm shift to monotheism.

So, on the way to its final phase of individualism, also called 'democracy' in politics, this transition to monotheism has been going on for hundreds of years.

That's how it went around:


In addition to this giga social religious process, many of the same developments will take place at micro level in the evolution. So, countless transitions will have taken place unnoticed. There is no line in, except the conversion from monotheism to polytheism and back:


So, what really happens is that Christianity as polytheism fades into individualism, after which a monotheistic terror takeover will take place. That's the main law of bipedal evolution. And as political correctness is the messenger of dying Christianity in individualism, so postmodernism is the devil in disguise of identity politics from monotheistic racism:


How things are connected:
Inbreeding vs Outbreeding.
Monotheism vs Polytheism.
Collectivism vs Individualism.
SM-dyad vs Vanilla-dyad.
Postmodernism vs Political Correctness.



Individualism means expelling God as the monotheistic tyrant from the red core. But then masochism searches for new sadism to complete its sexual lust. Because masochism as point in space has no direction, the tragedy of political correctness:




And so, both Europe and the US are in the same process to find a new master: 

Europe:


The United States:


It is the same process for 14 millions years:





This means the expulsion of God is also part of fading polytheism:

The God instinct of bipedal primates

For herd animals and especially bipedal primates the God instinct is placed in the right temporal lobe. Important for bipeds, it is connected to good and evil for already 14 million years. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality. So, you can imagine what happens if one tries to circumference the God instinct in politics. One will lose contact with voters. Like postmodernist democrats in Congress.



The God concept in American Politics

United States lost the notion of good and evil

Assumption 631: The power of God.
It's not about the existence of God. It is about the acknowledgement of God as ruler about good and evil in bipedal evolution. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality.




Identity politics serve to direct individuals, who, however, unconsciously cannot forget their belief in God, their innate notion of good and evil. What notion cannot be overruled by any set of values from political gangs (Mao, Hitler or Stalin). It is the ancient God instinct linked to primal good and evil, which is important.

The first bipedal primates already developed the god-concept just like animals, from which primates lived in groups together around the Alpha male. The leader of the tribe decided between good and evil, what became our juridical instinct.

So, this god-concept is not from an old white male supremacist with grey hair, but is the overarching morality of good and evil, brought to us from antiquity through the Judeo-Christian culture.




This means the Judeo Christian culture - as a lot of other religions in the evolution - is bound to the primal morality of good and evil from bipedal primates. Of course religions can differ regarding good and evil, but not so much as we would think. There is a moral high ground that cannot be denied.

This moral concept works for monotheism (Islam) as well as for polytheism (Christianity). Well, these religions differ profoundly on good and evil, but that's another problem.


The Constitution

The reason for mentioning God in the Constitution is to unite the morals of voters on a common scale: from Good to Evil. Differences from insight between religious groups can then be discussed politically in parliament, because representatives have already accepted the basic principles of good and evil by their faith.

But if God no longer forms part of the constitution, rulers no longer reach the people on their unconscious wavelength. And then the country becomes ungovernable unless groups of people can be addressed differently through identity politics. This always happens with violent indoctrination. Earlier we already saw how powerless resurrection from Islam had to be indoctrinated for 1400 years, because it could not counterbalance earthly reincarnation in the unconscious.

So, removing God from the Constitution, from money and all kinds of official ceremonies, means to deny fundamental human values connected with good and evil on a very deep and primitive level of human functioning. For believers but also for unbelievers...




The political left does not believe in God and the Constitution anymore and want God removed from all government institutions. Then they will gain total freedom of acting, stripped of every morality.


But removing God from politics immediately leads to a Babylonian speech confusion about good and evil, in which ultra left straightens out what is crooked. In American Congress, ultra left has already taken extreme and uncontrolled freedom in moral handling. Although greedy and corrupt republicans (Rhinos) are not much better for other reasons. 

So, it is not because of religiosity of rulers that God is in the Constitution, but more to establish a common denominator as fundamental basis for bargaining about good and evil among representatives.

Assumption 631: The power of God.
It's not about the existence of God. It is about the acknowledgement of God as ruler about good and evil in bipedal evolution. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality.

By the way, moral corruption has been in the American Constitution from the beginning, further stipulated in the 1870's by not accepting common objectifiable rules for the Union States in choosing representatives for the Federation. The United States, which want to teach the world democracy.

The United States of America are a Union of Independent States in the first place. They are the acting entities, they are the tribal identities. But to be able to govern this enormous country the States had to make concessions to the Federation, which has nearly no tribal identity. So, around 1870 the Union States were not held to any rule to organize their voting procedures in an orderly manner. And of course, that led to corruption from the start. A flaw in the Constitution? Definitely, at the least.



Racism nested in Paradigm Shift:

So in the US two processes occur at the same time: The Paradigm Shift from Polytheism to Monotheism and nested within this shift the racist relationship between The Slave Race and the Master Race.

It is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in their paradigm shift.

The American public might think that it is about racism, but political gangs have a different objective, although I doubt whether they know what they are doing.

And the 'proof' is that the same process in Europe takes place without racism, because Muslims are welcomed in Europe by PC.






Basic Dimension


1: The Native-Immigrant Model (Mod 1:NI)

In the Native-Immigrant model different races or ethnicities compete for the same land. This model follows a mutual racist-racist model, called a sadist-sadist relationship
The ultimate result of this armed peace might be the integration of groups.

- The evolutionary goal of racism is to manage conflict on an individual level to prevent intergroup civil wars.





2: The Master-Slave Model (Mod 2:MS)

The Master-Slave model shows a sado-masochistic relationship between master and slave. In this, the slave race or ethnicity is incapable of defending itself against the master. It is the racist-antiracist model. This model always falls apart eventually.








The attempted extermination of Native Americans in America was systemic anti-racism through Western immigrants. Even not verbally articulated, it was an ideological goal in itself.













Assumption 634: Systematic and systemic racism.
Systematic racism is just a tool to arrive at wealth and prosperity, which is the core of the ideology. But systemic racism is part of the ideology itself. Nazi Germany was a systemic racist ideology to eliminate other races or ethnicities:





In Western Europe, Muslims are not seen as invaders, although they are of different ethnicity. But the Muslim culture (SM-dyad) is complementary to Political Correctness (Vanilla-dyad).





3: The Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS)

The Cultural Segregation model can be a combination of the Master-Slave model and the Native-Immigrant model after slaves became free. In this combined model, slaves do not integrate further into the master culture after liberation. 

Slave and Master remain functionally fixed in their former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS), which was expected to evolve into the general sadist-sadist mode of (Mod 1:NI). But it failed. This process possibly stalls in disintegration before segregation.






Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolves in mutual symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model  (Mod 4:CI)But this model will eventually disappear into the Mixed Race variant:


4: The Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI)

(Mod 4:CI) can be the follow up model of (Mod 1:NI), but not easily of (Mod 2:MS)unless the functional fixed relationship from (Mod 2:MS) becomes the satisfying  cultural equation for integration between Master and Slave culture, which ultimately could evolve into assimilation, which is rather doubtful:






The predator model: Political Gangs:


5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Insincere Anti-Racism model is nested in the general Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI). In this model (Mod 5: IAR), there is a more or less undefined political actor (GA), which takes the lead while invoking systemic anti-racism as ideology and confirming former slaves (SL) and Mixed Race (MR) in the injustice that has been done to them, and fair enough, but at the same time inciting the public into counter-racism through outright aggression against the former Master race or ethnicity (MA). This is not peaceful anti-racism, but malicious and highly aggressive racism, which wouldn't be a problem if it was frankly spoken.

And that's at odds with the so called "anti-racism" of the core ideology of the Gang (GA). This is not a fruitful path to integration, if that was the intention. But then, what is their intention? That's the question.
























Basic Dimension


(407) Woke Hominids spread Identity Politics


This article is about two aspects that will decide the Civil War in the US:

1: The God instinct of bipedal primates.


And now we know why.


2: The Transition between polytheism and monotheism.

        Reversing Paradigm Shift in Human Religion

Assumption 632: Transitions between Polytheism and Monotheism:

Bipedal primate religions are subsequent varying between inbreeding (monotheism) and outbreeding (polytheism). 

1: Monotheism creates a stifling dictatorship predicated on collectivity (identity politics).
2: After which polytheism gets a chance (Jesus).
3: But in its final phase of development, polytheism always ends in individuality.
4: As a result, every tribal identity is lost, so that a monotheistic power hold is obvious.


 

But first how woke we can be:

Woke hominids expelled the Pope and took in the place of God on Earth as his representatives:





What does 'woke' mean?

According to the Oxford English Dictionary "woke" is defined as: "Originally: well-informed, up-to-date. Now chiefly: alert to racial or social discrimination and injustice."

The OED states: "By the mid-20th century, woke had been extended figuratively to refer to being 'aware' or 'well informed' in a political or cultural sense."

The Urban Dictionary adds: "Being woke means being aware… knowing what’s going on in the community (related to racism and social injustice)."

To summarize: woke means a person is consciously awake.

The term is of African American origin and refers to perceived awareness of issues concerning social and racial justice.

                                            ----------------------------------------


That's the 'positive side' of woke. But what if these woke individuals have nothing from themselves? What if they have everything in common. What if they are just indoctrinated speaking tubes from political gangs? What if they have no individual identity anymore? 





What if woke-people attack their own kind ferociously if they are not spreading the message in the right way? Just like communism and socialism? 

Then it's simple, the 'Woke'- state is a form of Identity Politics from Political Gangs, which state is enforced by racism if predicated on race and ethnicity. 
And pure discrimination otherwise. 

Anyways, gauging the individual's 'wokeness' gives rulers the opportunity to control them from their outside visible features and behavior. And that is because they have no idea from the inside anymore, no idea of the God-instinct of bipedal primates:




So, this Woke code of conduct should be read from outward characteristics of the individual. His inner self is suppressed and discarded. Wokeness is closely described conduct to which the individual must comply in a socialist or right wing dictatorship. And if he accidentally makes a mistake, he will be slaughtered and expelled from the group as ungovernable. So then, woke soldiers are actually slaves from underlying political gangs.
Assumption 629: The Wokeness paradox: 
Woke People have the illusion to respond alert to social themes. But they don't realize how little woke they are to dark political gangs that manipulate their 'wokeness'.
Woke people think to reform the world to their own political views. But they all yell the same mantras imposed on them through political gangs:




'Wokeness' comes down to self fulfilling prophecies from like-minded groups. Stamping in slogans and yelling mantras brings the holy goal closer, so that they magically believe in their own nonsense, just as religion. Most important is the neglect of the God-instinct. This is the tragedy of atheism in politics: to lose discrimination between good and evil, which has been given to bipedal primates by the God-instinct. And which, by the way, is totally independent from the belief in God. 
Assumption 631: The power of God.
It's not about the existence of God. It is about the acknowledgement of God as ruler about good and evil in bipedal evolution. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality.

 

1: The God instinct of bipedal primates

The God instinct

For herd animals and especially bipedal primates the God instinct is placed in the right temporal lobe. Important for bipeds, it is connected to good and evil for already 14 million years. So, you can imagine what happens if one tries to circumference the God instinct in politics. One will lose contact with voters. Like postmodernist democrats in Congress.




The God concept in American Politics

United States lost the notion of good and evil

Assumption 631: The power of God.
It's not about the existence of God. It is about the acknowledgement of God as ruler about good and evil in bipedal evolution. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality.

 





Identity politics serve to direct individuals, who, however, unconsciously cannot forget their belief in God, their innate notion of good and evilWhat notion cannot be overruled by any set of values from political gangs (Mao, Hitler or Stalin). It is the ancient God instinct linked to primal good and evil, which is important.

The first bipedal primates already developed the god-concept just like animals, from which primates lived in groups together around the Alpha male. The leader of the tribe decided between good and evil, what became our juridical instinct.

So, this god-concept is not from an old white male supremacist with grey hair, but is the overarching morality of good and evil, brought to us from antiquity through the Judeo-Christian culture.


 
I repeat, God is not a white male supremacist with a grey beard,
I only had no time to draw another one.

This means the Judeo Christian culture - as a lot of other religions in the evolution - is bound to the primal morality of good and evil from bipedal primates. Of course religions can differ regarding good and evil, but not so much as we would think. There is a moral high ground that cannot be denied.

This moral concept works for monotheism (Islam) as well as for polytheism (Christianity). Well, these religions differ profoundly on good and evil, but that's another problem.


The Constitution

The reason for mentioning God in the Constitution is to unite the morals of voters on a common scale: from Good to Evil. Differences from insight between religious groups can then be discussed politically in parliament, because representatives have already accepted the basic principles of good and evil by their faith.

But if God no longer forms part of the constitution, rulers no longer reach the people on their unconscious wavelength. And then the country becomes ungovernable unless groups of people can be addressed differently through identity politics. That always happens with violent indoctrination. Earlier we already saw how powerless resurrection from Islam had to be indoctrinated for 1400 years, because it could not counterbalance earthly reincarnation in the unconscious.

So, removing God from the Constitution, from money and all kinds of official ceremonies, means to deny fundamental human values connected with good and evil on a very deep and primitive level of human functioning. For believers but also for unbelievers...



The political left does not believe in God and the Constitution anymore and want God removed from all government institutions. Then they will gain total freedom of acting, stripped of every morality.



But removing God from politics immediately leads to a Babylonian speech confusion about good and evil, in which ultra left straightens out what is crooked. In American Congress, ultra left has already taken extreme and uncontrolled freedom in moral handling. Although greedy and corrupt republicans (Rhinos) are not much better for other reasons. 

So, it is not because of religiosity of rulers that God is in the Constitution, but more to establish a common denominator as fundamental basis for bargaining about good and evil among representatives.

Assumption 631: The power of God.
It's not about the existence of God. It is about the acknowledgement of God as ruler about good and evil in bipedal evolution. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality.

By the way, moral corruption has been in the American Constitution from the beginning, further stipulated in the 1870's by not accepting common objectifiable rules for the Union States in choosing representatives for the Federation. The United States, which want to teach the world democracy.

The United States of America are a Union of Independent States in the first place. They are the acting entities, they are the tribal identities. But to be able to govern this enormous country the States had to make concessions to the Federation, which has nearly no tribal identity. So, around 1870 the Union States were not held to any rule to organize their voting procedures in an orderly manner. And of course, that led to corruption from the start. A flaw in the Constitution? Definitely, at the least.


Spreading Wokeness through Identity Politics are the following groups:

Neo Marxism
PC
Postmodernism
Democrats: Ultra Left.
Antifa
BLM
Republicans (Rhinos)

They are spreading the message, but are they also the initiators of the doctrines? Are they themselves the political strategists? Probably not. So, though Woke Hominids control the masses in person, they might not be the inventors of their policy. And that's always wrong and insincere, saying a movement comes out of the people where this clearly cannot be the case.

Then, there definitely must be background strategists steering Woke Hominids on their holy expedition. And there must be dark financiers, superrich globalists maybe, with possibly quite different interests than this silly 'wokeness'. Do they try to drive a wedge between The Mixed Race and Former Slaves?






This illustrates the great danger in which the United States have ended up. Their fate does not depend on known actors any longer. Though that never was the case. But now it becomes serious.


Political Correctness (PC) started from Individualism

PC started with Neo Marxist relativism of cultural norms and values: All cultures were equal and equivalent, leaving individual norms free to vary arbitrary. God no longer existed. It led to multiculturalism, which ultimately amounts to individualism. 
Remember individualism is also the final stage of Christianity and from every polytheistic culture.






In the United States, PC caused no invasion of Muslims as in Europe:






In the US, PC developed in a different way and political gangs have taken over the power of God:



Unknown bad political actors have taken the place of God, taken from the Catholic Church, as "representatives of God". But that must lead to absurd outcomes and we will do a forecast about the next civil war in the United States in one of the following articles. 



As said, the reason for mentioning God in the constitution is to bring the morals from voters in line with the evolution. Because it happened that the concept of God in the evolution is bound to a subsequent series of moral values. And these moral values contain the basic principles of good and evil that were already known to the first bipedal primates. Differences from insight between religious groups can be discussed politically if representatives have accepted these basic principles of good and evil.

Now you may already see what matters: the God premise ultimately determines the success of all take-overs in history. It decided the downfall of communism in the former Soviet Union, It will also decide the downfall of the Communist Party in China. It defeated socialism and will defeat Atheism in politics. And now you also can Imagine who will win next Civil War in The United States. There is only one key: The deep felt meaning of Good and Evil is decisive, only bound tot the God-concept from the evolution. Given by the first bipedal primates:


And now we know why.


Forced woke followers (e.g. students on Campus)

With the onset of the Woke Hominid (e.g. woke university professors), the God concept has been discarded and students are brainwashed to lose their innate compass of good and evil. 

Students are brainwashed with force and extreme pressure to assumed and alleged group characteristics, what we call 'identity politics' from Postmodernism. So, instead of accepting God as unifying principle of good and evil, woke professors prescribe students who they are and what they are expected to think.


2: The Transition between polytheism and monotheism

Polytheism and Monotheism

Political Correctness is the heir to Christianity. And like a faded flower which disintegrates over time and loses all coherence, the collective name of all those leaves is: Political Correctness.



PC is a Human Religion, built of two consecutive but contradictory developments after Christianity: Individualism from Polytheism (Vanilla-dyad) and Identity politics from Monotheism (tribalism, SM-dyad). This repetitive switch between religions has been going on already for 14 million years in the evolution.

As said we arbitrarily will take PC for individualism and Postmodernism for collectivism and identity politics.


We show how things are connected as follows:

Inbreeding vs Outbreeding.
Monotheism vs Polytheism.
Collectivism vs Individualism.
SM-dyad vs Vanilla-dyad.
Postmodernism vs Political Correctness.
 
In this way we bridge the political crisis in the US to its evolutionary counterpart by stipulating an evolutionary based transition.

Above transition can also be shown for sexuality, in which Vanilla-dyad (Me too movement) is prosthesis for SM-dyad (Hollywood). A religious transition from the evolution is playing for our eyes right now: from polytheism back to monotheism:





Polytheistic Northern European peoples adhered to Christianity because of respect of Jesus for females, for female sexual roles, where gods are sexual roles, just as in ancient Greece.

The second development is that any polytheistic religion develops into individualism in its final state. Because outcrossing among different peoples, called genetic diversity, means to give up any tribal identity in the end, any overarching group religion, falling down to individualism, to the denial of God! To atheism and in the end to the moral poverty of Political Correctness.

So, polytheistic religions in a natural way reach their final stage of 'faded rose' in individualism. This means Christianity will lose its group identity, its tribal identity, on which it is defenseless against for example Islam, which is a monotheistic religion, but also against unidentified political gangs which make use of silly woke actors.




Postmodernism (Superior Religion, Monotheism) is at odds with Neo Marxism (Inferior Religion, Polytheism):





Postmodernism with Identity Politics (ideological collectivism) is the turnover from Vanilla-dyad (sexual equality) back to SM-Dyad, where PC earlier inserted on women's emancipation (equal sexual roles) and Vanilla-dyad (soft sex)

Postmodernism is the SM-wolf in sheep's clothing, the prohibited dream from Hollywood. So, the initial transition from PC to individualism as end stage of Christianity is immediately evolutionary corrected by Postmodernism back to ideological collectivism, leading to SM-Dyad from monotheism.

Fundamentally, PC in Postmodernism went from polytheism to monotheism and more fundamentally from outbreeding to inbreeding. We must remember these origins to keep track on evolutionary history. But it is clear, in the US, outbreeding and inbreeding play no role.

Though PC initially denied absolute moral values according to Neo-Marxism (Individualism), in the rebound Postmodernism made an exception for group norms (identity politics), which is amazing and shocking in relation to their earlier individualism. In effect, they hacked into the uprooted individualists and placed them in the group of identity politics.

Assumption 632: Transitions between Polytheism and Monotheism:

REVERSING PARADIGM SHIFT IN HUMAN RELIGION

Bipedal Primate religions are subsequent varying between inbreeding (monotheism) and outbreeding (polytheism). 

If this transition takes place within one generation, we speak of a religious conflict. Well-known is the abrupt paradigm shift from Judaism (Monotheism) to Christianity (Polytheism) that gave big problems in 33 AD. 

And now we witness another transition back from PC (Polytheism) to Postmodernism (Monotheism). This happens also within one generation and therefore can cause great social unrest (Civil War).

Characteristic is the final phase from Polytheism that passes into individualism. Polytheism then loses every group identity and becomes a simple prey for super strong monotheism, which is based on tribal collectivism.

So, it's easy:

1: Monotheism creates a stifling dictatorship predicated on collectivism (identity politics).
2: After which polytheism gets a chance (Jesus).
3: But in its final phase of development, polytheism always ends in individuality.
4: As a result, every tribal identity is lost, so that a monotheistic power hold is obvious.











Postmodernism introduced collectivism:

Wiki: Collectivism
Collectivism is a value that is characterized by emphasis on cohesiveness among individuals and prioritization of the group over the self. Individuals or groups that subscribe to a collectivist worldview tend to find common values and goals as particularly salient and demonstrate greater orientation toward in-group than toward out-group

Notice that the last sentence also discriminates inbreeding cultures from outbreeding cultures. Where inbreeding and outbreeding in the evolution always go together with monotheism and polytheism

What we see here is how dying Christianity passes from individualism to collectivism. How outcrossing passes to inbreeding. How polytheism returns to monotheism and vice versa in the evolution.

In the following, Political Correctness will be defined as striving to individualism and Postmodernism in the rebound as promoting collectivism and identity politics. But labeling this religious transition is rather arbitrary:



Postmodernism is a reaction on the Modernists presuppositions of rational and scientifically based individualism from the Enlightenment. They reject all narratives, the Enlightenment but also religious narratives. So, Postmodernists are sceptical about grand narratives. But they also do not agree with Marxism (battleground between oppressor and oppressed, between exploiter and exploited, between bourgeoisie and proletariat, between owners and workers). Postmodernists, who reject every narrative however, built a new one: They replace personal identity (Individualism) with group identity (collective identity). The racial group, the ethnical group, the gender group, the sexual preference group. They exchanged individual identity with group identity and changed the proposition that history is driven by economic conflicts between the oppressor and the oppressed (Marxism), into: history is driven by power relationships between the oppressor and the oppressed.  And last but not least that is a grand narrative too. So, postmodernism set itself checkmate. But striving to power is no means to attain competence, which is what 'patriarchal hierarchies' essentially defines. Postmodernism is sceptical about the applicability of grand narratives, what comes down to the rejection of their own narrative about power relations.

 

Here, Jordan Peterson encountered an irregularity in the transition from Neo-Marxism to Postmodernism. But as a result, our attention was drawn to the following paradigm shift in human religion. See for example the Myth of Abraham on this blog:





Postmodernism is the actual danger that the US will deposit into a civil war. It has since branched in all the forums of society. 

So, it is not Christianity against Islam, it is polytheism versus monotheism. And polytheistic are also American Indians and indigenous peoples from South America, from which many BTW became Catholic after the European invasion. So, they stayed polytheistic, just like African Negroes who were Voodoo for already 350 thousand years. And polytheistic Voodoo is the religious pendant of monotheistic inbreeding cultures diverging from East Africa into the Arabian peninsula, 60,000 years ago:








Basic Dimension


(406) Homo naledi gave us Archetypal Racism 
(406) Homo naledi gave us Archetypal Racism 




MODERN RACISM IS SICK MAGICAL THINKING, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN ALWAYS THE CASE.

Racism from Homo sapiens arose from a genuine sexual instinct from bipedal primates. It was meant as a centripetal force. But subsequently, human racism has been badly modified in the evolution to a centrifugal force. This is caused by our enlarged frontal cortex, allowing people since Homo erectus dumb magical concepts to play psychologist, as I do now:



HOMO NALEDI KNEW OUR SICK BRAIN:


THE HIERARCHY OF RELIGIOUS CONCEPTS:


BETWEEN LIFE AND DEATH:


SLEEP FOREVER:




Tribal identity


Assumption 625Tribal identities.
Cultures are defined by their tribal identity from which religions are derived.  

The first bipedal primates diverged in outward appearance from extreme inbreeding in seclusion, looking like different species and surviving only by practicing what we would now call "racism" in distinguishing between the ethnicities of their species. 
And  bipedal primates had good reasons to practice "racism" for 14 million years. If we do not understand these roots of racism, further discussion becomes difficult.

It's amazing how well definitions of modern racism (below) would have promoted the survival of bipedal primates. This way contemporary racism of the human race could be traced back to the first bipeds of 14 million years ago:





WE ARE A SICK SPECIES AND PROUD OF THAT:


Modern racism

Definitions:

Assumption 627: Identity politics:
Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religionracesocial backgroundclass or other identifying factor develop political agendas based around one or more of these categories.

Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Racism/discrimination is part of identity politics.

The first bipedal primates assumed that the appearance of individuals of a certain subspecies could be equated with their (deviating) tribal identity. Therefore, they easily confused the individual with his group based on external features.

Assumption 628Identity politics is a policy of Woke Hominids to manage the people by projecting alleged group characteristics into naΓ―ve individuals.




General aspects of racism:

- The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

- The belief that each race has distinct and intrinsic attributes.

Definitions


From The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

  • The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
  • Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

From Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

  •  The belief that each race has distinct and intrinsic attributes.
  •  The belief that one race is superior to all others.
  •  Prejudice or discrimination based upon race.

From WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.

  • Discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of another race
  • The prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races
 
Basic Dimension:      

Discrimination, prejudice, and abusive behavior stem from the assumption that races have distinct and intrinsic traits and abilities, which is why superior and inferior races are postulated.
                                    

Species and subspecies:

Technically, a species is a population or groups of populations that can potentially interbreed freely within and among themselves. Subspecieson the other hand, are subgroups within a species that have different traits and are defined by scientists

https://askabiologist.asu.edu/questions/human-races

What’s the difference between race and subspecies?

A long time ago, the words race and subspecies were used to mean the same thing in biology. This was before we knew how much or how little genes could differ between animals. Now we only use subspecies to refer to living things that aren’t human. We only use race when we talk about humans. We often try to group humans by race based on how they look. While humans may look different on the outside, our DNA looks very similar. 

 

It is clear that the process of human racism can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. 

Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integrationassimilation and segregation. It is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. The biggest problem of racism is identity politics, which is the resulting meaning of racism. The second problem generated by identity politics is to take no personal responsibility for life and to demand equality of outcome which ruins every society, instead of equality of opportunity which removes racism in the long run.





Resume: Homo sapiens' racism is bad, because it projects alleged group characteristics into the individual. We now call this identity politicsBut the first bipedal primates could not talk yet and had to infer the tribal origin from the outward features of a passing stranger (the Archetype of Racism):



Assumptions:


Assumption 621: The Archetype of Racism:
The first bipedal hominids relied primarily on inbreeding for survival. Then inbreeding became tribal identity. Much later tribal identity led to religion: The Inbreeding Cult which is still alive. The first bipeds did not die out easily from inbreeding because of their varied genome like chimpanzees. But extensive inbreeding in many places created a variety of different looking subspecies. And so, they checked passing hominids for tribal identity by looking to their outward features. In this way, 'racism' arose as a way of allowing strangers into the tribe. This archetype of racism therefore only looked at outward appearances and not at psychological characteristics projected into races or subspecies.

Assumption 622: The definition of Racism:
Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Assumption 623: The intent of Racism.
Racism tries to achieve symbolic balance between cultures, between tribal identities, bringing races or ethnicities into the cultural harmony of integration and assimilation. And of course those are almost always unpleasant corrections from both sides.

Assumption 624Outwardly features led to 'racism'. The first bipedal primates were interested in outwardly features of aliens to determine whether they belonged to their species. Then it was decided whether they should be admitted to their tribe or exiled. So, outwardly features were cues regarding tribal identity, which identities had to match. Because the first bipedal primates had a lot of genetic variation in the same species, checking facial features was a meaningful substitute for tribal identity, especially since they could not talk yet. Also, no difference was assumed between individuals and their tribes.

Assumption 625Tribal identities.
Cultures are defined by their tribal identity from which religions are derived.

Assumption 626: Racial weights. Tribal identities between cultures must be harmonized for integration towards assimilation. This will be achieved by the racial weight from the other culture on the own tribal identity.

Assumption 627: Identity politics:
Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religionracesocial backgroundclass or other identifying factor develop political agendas based around one or more of these categories.

Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Racism/discrimination is part of identity politics.

The first bipedal primates assumed that the appearance of individuals of a certain subspecies could be equated with their (deviating) tribal identity. Therefore, they easily confused the individual with his group based on external features.

Assumption 628Identity politics is a policy of Woke Hominids to manage the people by projecting alleged group characteristics into naΓ―ve individuals.


We descend from Homo naledi!


Homo naledi was the lesser of Homo erectus and they lived more than 2 million years alongside each other in Africa. Most likely Homo naledi hid from erectus but many times females must have been captured by erectus. And so DNA from naledi ended up in erectus, but not vice versa.

The same probably happened with Homo neanderthalensis who raped females of Homo sapiens, whose DNA is not found in neanderthalensis.




Homo erectus had a varied DNA and practiced inbreeding and outbreeding. 
So, Homo erectus was not a pure inbred population and more importantly, he
invented the soul and earthly reincarnation:




Homo naledi, on the other hand, was a pure inbreeding culture that did not believe in the soul or reincarnation, but in a kind of earthly rebirth, just like new plants grow out of the soil under the influence of the God of Darkness:




Homo erectus must have been a terrible obsession for Homo naledi and the latter developed a religion to protect their tribes through almost complete inbreeding and isolation. They also prevented their unborn fetuses from being born into the wombs of Homo erectus females:




There has probably been a variety of subspecies of Homo erectus, at least two, and the admixture with Homo naledi definitely led to Homo sapiens in a straight line. Homo naledi was a balanced inbred population (like dog breeds), which indirectly delivered its DNA to Homo sapiens, which unfortunately had a much less varied genome and thus became extremely vulnerable to inbreeding:




And because inbreeding cultures cannot survive without racism for the preservation of their DNA, Homo naledi transferred its archetypal instinct of "racism" from Australopithecus through Homo erectus to Homo sapiens as the Archetype of Racism.

Subsequently, Homo sapiens developed the modern variant of racism (identity politics) as we know racism today. But  the modern Homo sapiens variant is misleading and sometimes unethical. Today's mess comes from Marxism and postmodernism, which basically amounts to projecting alleged group characteristics onto naΓ―ve
individuals.

The difference with Homo naledi is that the Archetype of Racism was sincere in itself and already got enough information from facial features (phenotype) to judge 
assimilation or segregation for the spread of their genotype. So, what they saw was what they got. Archetypal racism has been a sincere effort to keep the species pure on behalf of tribal identity.

The phenotype of the stranger was directly comparable to their subspecies, their tribal identity, their religion (Rebirth or Reincarnation), which identities had to match. Thus, they did not make psychological projections beyond the individual's phenotype. So, there was no sneaky modern variant of racism (see the Racism equation) that aimed at forced integration of other cultures. This deceptive process was not developed until Homo sapiens (or Homo erectus).

But indeed, Homo erectus probably already used the Master-Slave model for Homo naledi females:




It is a fluke that Dr. Lee Berger stumbled upon Homo naledi in the Rising Star Cave. Many thanks to him and his team. Lee Berger changed the paleoanthropology of Homo sapiens. Dinaledi chamber changed our understanding of human evolution forever:






Bipedal primates on the savannas:






The bipedal mutation:



Actually, there was not a single mutation, but a whole series of subsequent mutations to adapt bipedal primates to the savannas. That Period lasted from 14 million years to 7 million years ago. And from then on the first remains that indicate an upright-walking species were found:

The pelvis had changed:



The skull attached at chimpanzees posteriorly now stood erect at the body (inferiorly).




Bipeds could now easily walk 18 km in a day against chimpanzees 4 km.




So, four-legged primates were stunned to see such a weird bipad:





A further question is how did bipedal primates manage to defend themselves during 14 million years in the African wilderness? Do we really think they climbed into low savanna trees to escape felines? Felines who got up before them? No, they must have formed a bastion of individuals armed with long spears with sharp points to attack their predators aggressively. They definitely attacked, otherwise they would have died out already long ago.



Assumption 374A necessary condition for bipedality was spear defense. Bipedal primates did not exchange the forests for the savannas without this simple and effective protection against predators. Spears were not invented but arose naturally from their environment. Australopiths must have transported multiple spears tied together with ropes from knotted grasses. Knots that they did not invent, but that originated naturally and were learned to untie. First bipeds themselves invented nothing, no stone tools, but wooden tools came on their way.


The model adapted to Australopiths:

1) Australopiths broke off a branch.

2) They trimmed the side branches and leaves.
3) They stripped it from bark by rubbing on rough surface like sharp rocks.
4) They sharpened the tip of the tool against the rocks to a sharp point.
5) Or they made points with their sharp teeth like chimps can do.
6) Australopiths must have transported multiple spears tied together with ropes from knotted grasses. Knots that they did not invent, but that originated naturally and were learned to untie. 
In most cases, the Fongoli chimpanzees carried out four or more steps to manufacture spears for hunting. In all but one of the cases:

1) chimps broke off a living branch to make their tool. They would then 
2) trim the side branches and leaves. In a number of cases, chimps also 
3) trimmed the ends of the branch and 
4) stripped it of bark. Some chimps also 
5) sharpened the tip of the tool with their teeth.

Inbreeding bipads and outbreeding quadrupads

Four-legged primates (quadrupeds) such as chimpanzees are tired of walking 5 km and then need to be at home again in the forest. Therefore, they never leave their biotope and are a stable factor among the other chimpanzee tribes. At the age of 7, female chimpanzees begin to leave their tribes and roam the forests in search of their outcrossing destination in another tribe. 

But males will stay together in their tree in the male cognate line. So the effect is almost perfect outbreeding, except when a hereditary disease breaks out in the male bloodline, what never happens. Well, I'm not certain of that, because alien male DNA in females.




Bipedal hominids, however, with their seven league boots could travel 18 km a day without tiring and entire groups disappeared over the horizon, into all directions. The further they walked, the more difficult it became to exchange young females. And even 2 million years ago, there were only 26,000 bipedal primates in the world. So the chances of African Homo erectus meeting others in Shangchen were very slim:




Nevertheless bipeds managed to exchange young females:

Paranthropus robustus (2 Ma; 400cc)

A 2011 study using ratios of strontium isotopes in teeth suggested that Australopithecus africanus and P. robustus groups in southern Africa were patrilocal: females tended to settle farther from their region of birth than males did.




Aborigines 50,000 years ago:




The point is that extreme inbreeding has occurred with bipedal primates on many places resulting in a wide variation of phenotypes from the same genotype of hominids. They could interbreed, but they knew that extreme inbreeding had also led to different tribal identities. And tribal identity led to tribal religion and was the unifying power of the tribe. That's why the first bipedal primates projected their own facial features onto the faces of passing strangers to estimate their tribal identity. Of course, they couldn't speak yet to get their information in another way.




This means that the Archetype of Racism was fair and did not focus on the psychology of the individual under review. His phenotype simply had to reflect the right tribal identity, which was vital to the survival of the tribe. If they recognized themselves in the stranger, he was accepted and otherwise refused.

inbred cultures are threatened by alien genomes, and therefore perpetuate by genetic discrimination, which is, of course, another word for racism. Well, maybe the same genome but different phenotypes.

Chimpanzees have an outbreeding culture in females, but inbreeding in males. But the total effect is outbreeding. Male chimps hate males from other tribes and will kill them on their territory. But they welcome alien juvenile females for outbreeding, because quadrupeds are outcrossing cultures. And because they like fresh females.

So, many bipedal hominid cultures must have been inbred populations like Homo naledi and thus discrimination and racism arose from inbred populations. And still today discrimination and racism are primarily to be found in inbreeding cultures. Outbreeding cultures (Christianity) mix with all kinds of peoples and practice less racism.

Homo naledi has lived alongside Homo erectus for 2 million years and developed a policy to reject hominins with different DNA, which we now would call racism:




- Homo naledi was an inbreeding culture but probably mixed with Homo erectus. Very probably we descent from this combination and that's why also humans are prone to inbreeding. That is, if Homo naledi is our predecessor then also his extreme inbreeding instinct came into our genes:




- Homo naledi (2.3 Mya - 236,000 Ka; 550cc) lived along side Homo erectus (2.2 Mya - 10,000 Ka; 900cc). It is almost certain that Homo erectus has captivated females from Homo naledi, so that genes from naledi came into erectus but not the other way around. Homo erectus simply was much stronger. 

Eventually Homo naledi was overrun by Homo erectus:









And these genes later passed into Homo sapiens. This makes Homo naledi the most notable predecessor of Homo sapiens:




The same with Homo neanderthalensis who dropped his genes into Homo sapiens but not the other way around. That's because Homo sapiens males did not like female Homo neanderthalensis. Homo sapiens practiced aesthetic female breeding but Homo neanderthalensis did not:




So the DNA from Homo naledi with all hominid traits ended up in Homo erectus but that of Homo erectus likely not in Homo naledi.

- This makes comprehensible the Rebirth cult of Homo naledi:




Homo naledi tried to prevent rebirth fetuses repaired and rejuvenated with longer telomeres by the God of Darkness from ending up accidentally in female wombs of Homo erectus, which is why Homo naledi likely kept his females in camps in front of the Rising Star Cave. Well, their tribes must have been closer to the Cave than Homo erectus tribes:




- And that means Homo naledi, who inherited a multimillion-year inbreeding culture, passed this extreme inbreeding instinct through Homo erectus to Homo sapiens:




- And that was special because Homo naledi was a balanced inbred culture (see dog breeds), wherein the phenotype for all individuals in Dinaledi chamber was the same and so there must have been a lot of homozygous combinations that no longer led to life-threatening autosomal recessive disorders because that had been selected over millions of years.

- And that means that homo species that evolved from this variant of Homo erectus inherited their rather strong inbreeding instinct most likely from Homo naledi.

- And this inbreeding instinct was prone to archetypal racism, which deteriorated into human racism (identity politics).

- In deviation to the genetic monoculture of Homo naledi, however, we also see genetic diversity in Homo erectus, for example in Dmanisi Georgia:

'Traditionally, researchers have used variation among Homo fossils to define different species. But in light of these new findings, Dr Lordkipanidze and his colleagues suggest that early, various Homo fossils, with their origins in Africa, actually represent variation among members of a single, evolving lineage - most appropriately, Homo erectus.'





But Homo sapiens got a disastrous impoverished genome, with identical alleles and prone to autosomal recessive disorders. Therefore I placed the wording of the Tree of Knowledge of autosomal recessive disorders at 74,000 years ago, central in the outburst of Mount Toba on Sumatra. The genetic downfall of Homo sapiens actually was from 100,000 - 50,000 years ago.

Therefore, the following conclusion looks somewhat premature: 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/05/210520133722.htm

The spread of modern humans out of Africa about 80,000 years ago is an important period in human history and is often described as a genetic bottleneck. Populations moved out of Africa and into Asia and Europe. The effects of these migrations can be seen even today. Genetic diversity is lower in populations outside of Africa than in African. That Pestera Muierii 1 has high genetic diversity implies that the greatest loss of genetic diversity occurred during the last Ice Age (which ended about 10,000 years ago) instead of during the out of Africa migration.

 

Conclusion strong inbreeding and archetypal racism:

If Homo naledi lived until 235,000 years ago and Homo sapiens appeared 350,000 years ago then it is nonsense not to see that Homo naledi was a direct predecessor of Homo sapiens.

- So, the extremities of Homo sapiens and Homo naledi must be causally linked, probably through Homo erectus. There is no reason for convergent evolution for manifestations of the same species that lived so closely together in the same period. 






Basic Dimension


(405) The Racism Equation




Preface:

Racism is a natural process that arises from a sexual instinct of bipedal primates. It is clear that this process can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. 

Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integrationassimilation and segregation. It is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. The main problem of racism is identity politics, which is the evolutionary meaning of racism. The second problem is to take no personal responsibility for life and to demand equality of outcome which ruins every society, instead of equality of opportunity which removes racism in the long run.


Assumption 621: The Archetype of Racism:
The first bipedal hominids relied primarily on inbreeding for survival. Then inbreeding became tribal identity. Much later tribal identity led to religion: The Inbreeding Cult which is still alive. The first bipeds did not die out easily from inbreeding because of their varied genome like chimpanzees. But extensive inbreeding in many places created a variety of different looking subspecies. And so, they checked passing hominids for tribal identity by looking to their outward features. In this way, 'racism' arose as a way of allowing strangers into the tribe. This archetype of racism therefore only looked at outward appearances and not at psychological characteristics projected into races or subspecies.

Assumption 622: The definition of Racism:
Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected onto them.

Assumption 623: The intent of Racism.
Racism tries to achieve symbolic balance between cultures, between tribal identities, bringing races or ethnicities into the cultural harmony of integration and assimilation. And of course those are almost always unpleasant corrections from both sides:




Assumption 624Outwardly features led to 'racism'. The first bipedal primates were interested in outwardly features of aliens to determine whether they belonged to their species. Then it was decided whether they should be admitted to their tribe or exiled. So, outwardly features were cues regarding tribal identity, which identities had to match. Because the first bipedal primates had a lot of genetic variation in the same species, checking facial features was a meaningful substitute for tribal identity, especially since they could not talk yet. Also, no difference was assumed between individuals and their tribes.

Assumption 625Tribal identities.
Cultures are defined by their tribal identity from which religions are derived.

Assumption 626: Racial weights. Tribal identities between cultures must be harmonized for integration towards assimilation. This will be achieved by the racial weight from the other culture on the own tribal identity.

Assumption 627: Identity politics:
Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religionracesocial backgroundclass or other identifying factor develop political agendas based around one or more of these categories.

Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Racism/discrimination is part of identity politics.

The first bipedal primates assumed that the appearance of individuals of a certain subspecies could be equated with their (deviating) tribal identity. Therefore, they easily confused the individual with his group based on external features.

Assumption 628Identity politics is a policy of Woke Hominids to manage the people by projecting alleged group characteristics into naΓ―ve individuals.

Ultimate goal of racism

The ultimate goal of racism is to achieve symbolic balance between cultures. To that end, the racial balance seeks to bring races or ethnicities together in cultural harmony. And of course those are almost always unpleasant corrections from both sides:

(Racism x First culture) against (Racism x Second culture) gives cultural balance

(Racism x First culture) - (Racism x Second culture) = 0 (symbolically balanced)

(R(sec) x First culture) - (R(first) x Second culture) Balanced different cultures.

This cultural balance is a snapshot on the way to integrationassimilation or segregation. As long as racial weights are used, we speak of an unstable (dis)integration process. And without these weights, the process has stabilized in either assimilation or segregation.


Cultures are defined by Tribal Identity from which religion is derived:


Racial weight Natives (a) times the Tribal Identity of immigrants:

(Ra.w(second) x Trib.Ident(first) - (Ra.w(first) x Trib.Ident(sec)  = Balanced different cultures.

Tribal identities between cultures must be harmonized for integration towards assimilation. This will be achieved by the racial weight from the other culture.


There are several effects that play a role in racism:

1: Tribal identity is protected by racism.
2: Integration usually starts with mutual racism.
3: Integration can also be enforced by one-sided racism.
4: Assimilation doesn't have to be always mutual assimilation.
5: Assimilation can be enforced by one-sided racism.
6: Assimilation can also be offered unilaterally through cultural surrender.
7: Segregation starts when racism stops.
8: Civil war starts when segregation stops.

The Racism Factor

Mutual Assimilation means corresponding tribal identities (No racism).
One sided Assimilation means partly cultural surrender (Racism possible).
- Integration means balanced by racism, without equal tribal identities.
- Segregation means no longer racism.
Civil war means no segregation any more.


Integration starts with mismatched tribal identities:

When Slave tribal identity and Master identity do not fit:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)
x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)
a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)

(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (1 x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Slaves have no problems with Master identity.

x Slave Identity = b x Master Identity (b = Slave racism)

(1 x Slave Identity) = (R(Sl) x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.
Master has no no problems with Slave identity.

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

(R(MA) x Slave Identity) = (R(SL) x Master Identity). Balanced different cultures.
Both parties have problems with the other culture.


Assimilation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Mutual assimilation means matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism factor is 1 at both sides:

1 x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity.
      Slave identity = Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity match when RF = 1 for both sides:
(1 x) Slave identity corresponds to (1 x) Master identity, (No racism, 
assimilation achieved).

Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity(Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)
x Slave identity = b x Master identity, (Balanced one sided racism: b = Slave racism)
a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Balanced by mutual racism)



Segregation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Segregation also means not matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism Factor is 1 on both sides, by definition for this inequality:

1 x Slave identit 1 x Master identity.
      Slave identity  Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity don't match with segregation.




BASIC MODELS OF RACISM


There are two basic models of racism in the evolution:


1: The Native-Immigrant Model (Mod 1:NI)

In the Native-Immigrant model different races or ethnicities compete for the same land. This model follows a mutual racist-racist model, called a sadist-sadist relationship
The ultimate result of this armed peace might be the integration of groups towards assimilation:

Mutual racial integration process:

a x Immigrant Identity (II) = b x Native Identity NI) (Balanced by mutual racism)

(R(NI) x Immigrant Identity) = (R(II) x Native Identity). Balanced different cultures.

Both parties have problems with the other culture.

                                                                  ------------

- The evolutionary goal of racism is to manage conflict on an individual level to prevent intergroup civil wars:





Assimilation is difficult but not impossible in the Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI) and is dependent on the similarity between races or ethnicities.

- Through assimilation, one's own identity is integrated into the new combined identity, which can be unattractive for parties. Therefore, assimilation is more likely for individuals living among members of the other group than for populations as a whole. However, forced mixing at the individual level nearly always leads to severe racism and discrimination. And deliberate merging of whole races and ethnicities is disastrous, where crossbreeding can cause major identity problems. And the very prevention of the demise of tribal identity is exactly why 'racism' arose.

Integration may eventually be possible between races and ethnicities in (Mod 1:NI)
Integration involves adherence to the laws of the country, but retaining one's own culture. Integration seems the highest attainable way of living together with fairly different races or ethnicities. 

- Without integration, parallel societies will develop where segregation can become a breeding ground for racial unrest and ultimately civil war.

- The evolutionary goal of racism is to manage conflict on an individual level to prevent intergroup civil wars. This goal is already achieved with parallel societies if they are stable in nature. 


2: The Master-Slave Model (Mod 2:MS)


The Master-Slave model shows a sado-masochistic relationship between master and slave. In this, the slave race or ethnicity is incapable of defending itself against the master. It is the racist-antiracist model. This model always falls apart eventually.





Further, there are two non specific general models of racism:


3: The Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS)

The Cultural Segregation model can be a combination of the Master-Slave model and the Native-Immigrant model after slaves became free. In this combined model, slaves do not integrate further into the master culture after liberation. 

Slave and Master remain functionally fixed in their former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS), which was expected to evolve into the general sadist-sadist mode of (Mod 1:NI). But it failed. This process possibly stalls in disintegration before segregation:

Segregation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Segregation means not matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism Factor is 1 on both sides, by definition for this inequality:


1 x Slave identit 1 x Master identity.
      Slave identity  Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity don't match with segregation.





Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolves in mutual symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model  (Mod 4:CI)But this model will eventually disappear into the Mixed Race variant:


4: The Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI)

(Mod 4:CI) can be the follow up model of (Mod 1:NI), but not easily of (Mod 2:MS)unless the functional fixed relationship from (Mod 2:MS) becomes the satisfying  cultural equation for integration between Master and Slave culture, which ultimately could evolve into assimilation, which is rather doubtful:






Mutual symbiosis by racism  (Integration):

a x Immigrant Identity (II) = b x Native Identity (NI) (Balanced by mutual racism)

(R(NI) x Immigrant identity) = (R(II) x Native identity). Balanced different cultures.
Both parties have problems with the other culture. But eventually assimilation could be achieved. 

But in the case of (Mod 2:MS) races will eventually be completely absorbed into the Mixed Race in a few thousand years.

                                                                  ------------

Still another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolves into mutual symbiosis by forced one sided 'assimilation' into the Master culture of (Mod 1:NI):







Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity. (Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)
(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (1 x Master identity). Culturally balanced currently in integration

The next step could be that slaves no longer have problems with the master identity and both transition into assimilationIn which case the situation removes to the Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI). But without racial mixing, this is a very unstable solution, just like (Mod 2:MS). Well, that is, with racial mixing, the mess will be complete. So, what is the effect of racial mixing, that is the question. We try a screenplay.

General rule of racism: The only realistic possibility in the Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI) is integration while preserving mutual racism at the individual level to avoid clashes between races or ethnicities. Thus, assimilation is questionable.

But it is more likely that 3 racial or ethnic groups arise from (Mod 2:MS), which means that a Mixed Race (MR) has to fulfill a bridging function to integration. If not, parallel societies may still arise in the Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS).


Adding the Mixed Race (MR) to the equation:

Racial Interactions = aMA + bSL + cMR + dMASL + eMAMR +fSLMR + gMASLMR

The Master-Slave descendants:

The Mixed Race (MR) might enter a malicious symbiosis with the gang (GA):

The Mixed Race is stunned and disappointed by the adaptation of former slaves (SL) to the Master culture (MA) and will not accept this 'docile' attitude. Although this
functional fixed adaptation from former slaves to the Master culture apparently benefits both cultures and could therefore be most practically continued, this looks unpalatable to the newly developed cultural identity of the Mixed Race (MR), because they naturally want to be on an equal footing with the Master population. As a result, they are annoyed by the benevolent attitude of former slaves towards former Masters, and propagate peaceful anti-racism, which seems the real driving force behind their movement:







That means peaceful anti-racism may be sincerely meant as core ideology of the frustrated Mixed Race.

But there is a specific Predator Model in racism:

5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Mixed Race (MR) lost tribal identity and can be manipulated into the wrong direction (segregation) by a Political Gang (GA):

Racial Interactions = aMA + bSL + cMR+ dGA


Combinations:

A B C D
AB AC AD BC BD CD
ABC ABD ACD BCD
ABCD


5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Insincere Anti-Racism model is nested in the general Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI). In this model (Mod 5: IAR), there is a more or less undefined political actor (GA), which takes the lead while invoking systemic anti-racism as ideology and confirming former slaves (SL) and Mixed Race (MR) in the injustice that has been done to them, and fair enough, but at the same time inciting the public into counter-racism through outright aggression against the former Master race or ethnicity (MA). This is not peaceful anti-racism, but malicious and highly aggressive racism, which wouldn't be a problem if it was frankly spoken.

And that's at odds with the so called "anti-racism" of the core ideology of the Gang (GA). This is not a fruitful path to integration, if that was the intention. But then, what is their intention? That's the question.





Many times in the evolution tensions between races or ethnicities have been hijacked by political gangs that took advantage of a hopeless stalemate between parties by 
expulsion or massacre of one of the parties. So, it is not especially the Master-Slave model (Mod 2:MS), which is the victim of external powers, but any hopeless situation can seduce a third party to incite civil war.

Well, racism-racism is exactly where (Mod 1:NI) is for, so counter-racism is not bad here in principle, but certainly by honestly informing the people that they will be provoked into the right direction of counter-racism with looting and arson under the heading of anti-racism. That would be ethical and sincere. 

And it must be said (Mod 1:NI) is generally intended to achieve integration and better not to segregate. "Anti-racism" from pushing gangs thus abuses the functional fixedness of the former sado-masochistic relationship in (Mod 2:MS)which has since evolved back into a sadist-sadist environment through the liberation of the slaves (Mod 1:NI)

Thus, "anti-racism" (Mod 5: IAR) interferes with the functional fixed racist-antiracist relationship from (Mod 2:MS) nested in the racist-racist model (Mod 1:NI). Which relationship converges in a kind of (one-way) assimilation into the Master culture.

"Anti-racism" of (Mod 5: IAR) is therefore in parasitic symbiosis with the racist-racist model of (Mod 1:NI). The aim of this kind of anti-racism is to claim endless penance for the past and at the same time to aggressively demand more and more privileges without consideration. In effect, citizens are being held hostage by this misunderstood external actor. It must be emphasized that there is of course also genuine anti-racism.

So, insincere anti-racism is initiated by an outside party (GA) with an interest in breaking the status quo, where natural two sided integration is not obvious anymore. This because slaves (SL) already extradited their cultural identity to the Master race (MA), which situation is unsustainable in evolution and soon will be torpedoed by the Mixed Race (MR).
Assimilation by one-sided racism:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity. (Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)
(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (1 x Master identity). Culturally balanced currently in integration

 

Gang is breaking the status quo:

Where normally in the evolution racism works to reconcile cultures, now the gang (GA) is violently accusing the Master culture (MA) of incompatible immorality

The gang is empowered by looting and arson, misinforming former Slaves (SL) and Mixed Race (MR) about its evil nature.

Well, it is complicated and somewhere they maybe right but that does not matter. What matters is their insincerity to all parties. Their aim is to stall the integration process before working on to segregation or worse civil war. This all under the misleading systemic racism from "anti-racism". 
Systematic racism is just a tool to arrive at wealth and prosperity, which is the core of the ideology. But systemic racism is part of the ideology itself. Nazi Germany was a systemic racist ideology to eliminate other races or ethnicities. Political gangs as referred to in this article have officially anti-racism as their core ideology, which must be redefined as malignant racism with potential effect of extinction of the other race. This ultimate conclusion is justified because their core ideology is deliberately misleading, so that any sincerity can be questioned.

Resume:

But as said before, Model (Mod 2:MS) could have found some genuine assimilation of the former slave culture into the master culture. Then the real meaning of (Mod 5: IAR) could only be to disrupt assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war. This by using the Mixed Race (MR) as a lever.

And in principle counter-racism would be no problem in (Mod 1:NI) if former slaves (SL) and Mixed Race (MR) understood the real intention. However, the intention looks to worsen the relationship from Cultural Segregation (Mod 3:CS) to (Mod 5: IAR) by pretending to aim at integration from (Mod 4:CI)

So, (Mod 5: IAR) could intend to disrupt 'docile' assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war. In any case, it is risky to drag a group into an adventure that the majority of former slaves apparently does not aspire to.

The bottom line is that the newly created Mixed Race (MR) from former slaves (SL) and masters (MA) actually facilitates the gang (GA) and takes great responsibility for it. And they can't have everything in life, but they definitely can destroy everything of value:








Discussion:



Technically, a species is a population or groups of populations that can potentially interbreed freely within and among themselves. Subspecieson the other hand, are subgroups within a species that have different traits and are defined by scientists

https://askabiologist.asu.edu/questions/human-races

What’s the difference between race and subspecies?

A long time ago, the words race and subspecies were used to mean the same thing in biology. This was before we knew how much or how little genes could differ between animals. Now we only use subspecies to refer to living things that aren’t human. We only use race when we talk about humans. We often try to group humans by race based on how they look. While humans may look different on the outside, our DNA looks very similar. 

 So, gorillas are a different species than hominids.

Assumption 240: The development of racism.

1: In the animal world groups accept only members of the same kind so they can propagate. Hence, a group of gorillas will not accept a female chimp. This is discrimination between species. Later in the evolution, a different form of discrimination emerged, but now as discrimination within species, called racism in case of humans.
(Chimps developed a protein to ward off gorilla sperm, which protein now makes humans vulnerable for red meat.)
Humans deny what the first bipedal primates already knew. Outward features reveal the group from which the individual comes, which was equivalent to tribal identity for the first hominids 14 million years ago.

The first hominids of our species looked like subspecies by extreme inbreeding over millions of years. But they did not die out easily, because they had abundance genetic variation like chimpanzees to prevent autosomal recessive disorders:




So their outward appearance was very different and bipedal primates had to determine from which tribe an individual was and thus to estimate tribal identity, which much later led to 'religion'.

Note that tribal identity doesn't necessarily mean individual identity, but outward similarity was the best bet for people who couldn't speak yet.

So, 'racism' or what we would call it, prevented clashes between whole tribes on the same ground by preventing individual strangers from entering the tribal area:




Today, racism still works quite well to force groups into integrationassimilation, or segregation. It's the same, identical mechanism. And this ingroup/outgroup decision rule has been applied to individuals for 14 million years to prevent tribal conflicts that would otherwise have destroyed entire subspecies.

In the evolution nobody bothered about the individual and all were measured along identity politics.

So racism still functions adequately as an  ancient bipedal primate instinct. But it is unsuitable for judging individuals, as they may differ from their race or ethnicity. Identity politics has therefore increasingly become an improper racist instrumentUnfortunately, not everyone understood that.

So, the instinct of racism still works quite well to avoid clashes between tribes at the expense of the well-being and just assessment of the individual.

We also know that racism is a latent instinct, which must be genetically turned on. The rationale for activating racism seems to be specific individual behavior that appears to be characteristic of his race or ethnicity, thereby activating the gene. And now racism really gets complicated, because then it might still be functional in the evolution, while it is seen unethical in our era. And please, again, be fair and don't shoot the messenger.

Then the question becomes: can races and ethnicities coexist on the same ground without this abhorred racism? I'm not kidding, it's a real question. And if you think this must be entirely possible, then you're probably pointing to integration and assimilation. But that's just circular reasoning because you have to prove first that racism didn't accomplish that, which you can't.

And then the ultimate conclusion could be: without racism different cultural identities cannot united on which races or ethnicities would segregate or worse...

Could racism be the hard lesson from the evolution that we stubbornly don't want to see anymore? And are we confusing same DNA between races with same cultures, the same cultural identities? And have we forgotten that same DNA can be disproportionately selected by inbred cultures over millions of years? So that the composition of races and ethnicities changes over time? Homo naledi was probably a fairly closed and remarkably balanced inbreeding culture for 2.3 million years. Are we perhaps reshaping reality to our contemporary hedonistic desires in which everything must be linked to pleasure? Then the call for anti-racism could develop into segregation and ultimately into civil war.

Racism actually aims at culture, at tribal identity, and not at race in particular, which is only an observable intermediary cue and that's what we can learn from the evolution. With all our intellectual development we are on the wrong track, while first bipedal primates were right: cultural identity is tribal identity which leads to religion. Our second mistake is that we have no religion if we do not believe in God anymore. If only life could be that simple...







Basic Dimension


(404) Basic Models of Racism




Preface:

Racism is a natural process that arises from a sexual instinct of bipedal primates. It is clear that this process can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. 

Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integrationassimilation and segregation. It is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. The main problem of racism is identity politics, which is the evolutionary meaning of racism. The second problem is to take no personal responsibility for life and to demand equality of outcome which ruins every society, instead of equality of opportunity which removes racism in the long run.



       BASIC MODELS OF RACISM


Basic models of racism in the evolution:


1: The Native-Immigrant Model (Mod 1:NI)

In the Native-Immigrant model different races or ethnicities compete for the same land. This model follows a mutual racist-racist model, called a sadist-sadist relationship
The ultimate result of this armed peace might be the integration of groups.

- The evolutionary goal of racism is to manage conflict on an individual level to prevent intergroup civil wars:




Assimilation is difficult but not impossible in the Native-Immigrant model  (Mod 1:NI) and is dependent on the similarity between races or ethnicities.

- Through assimilation, one's own identity is integrated into the new combined identity, which can be unattractive for parties. Therefore, assimilation is more likely for individuals living among members of the other group than for populations as a whole. However, forced mixing at the individual level nearly always leads to severe racism and discrimination. And deliberate merging of whole races and ethnicities is disastrous, where crossbreeding can cause major identity problems. And the very prevention of the demise of tribal identity is exactly why 'racism' arose.

Integration may eventually be possible between races and ethnicities in (Mod 1:NI)
Integration involves adherence to the laws of the country, but retaining one's own culture. Integration seems the highest attainable way of living together with fairly different races or ethnicities. 

- Without integration, parallel societies will develop where segregation can become a breeding ground for racial unrest and ultimately civil war.

- The evolutionary goal of racism is to manage conflict on an individual level to prevent intergroup civil wars. This goal is already achieved with parallel societies if they are stable in nature. 


2: The Master-Slave Model (Mod 2:MS)

The Master-Slave model shows a sado-masochistic relationship between master and slave. In this, the slave race or ethnicity is incapable of defending itself against the master. It is the racist-antiracist model. This model always falls apart eventually.




Further, there are two sub-models of racism:


3: The Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS)

The Cultural Segregation model can be a combination of the Master-Slave model and the Native-Immigrant model after slaves became free. In this combined model slaves do not integrate into the master culture after liberation. Slave and Master remain functionally fixed in their former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS), which was expected to evolve into the general sadist-sadist mode of (Mod 1:NI). But it failed.





Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) has evolved in mutual symbiosis, as 'assimilation' into the Master culture of
(Mod 1:NI), in which case the situation removes to the Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI). But without racial mingling this is a very unstable solution, just as (Mod 2:MS).

The only realistic possibility in the Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI) is integration while preserving mutual racism at the individual level to avoid clashes between races or ethnicities.

But it is more likely that 3 racial or ethnic groups arise, which means that the mixed group has to fulfill a bridging function to integration. If not, parallel societies will still arise in the Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS).



4: The Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI)

(Mod 4:CI) can be the follow up model of (Mod 1:NI), but not easily of (Mod 2:MS).





5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Insincere Anti-Racism model is developed out of the former Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS), and nested in the general Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI)In this model a more or less undefined political actor takes the lead while invoking systemic anti-racism as ideology and confirming former slaves in the injustice that has been done to them, and fair enough, but at the same time inciting the public into counter-racism through outright aggression against the former Master race or ethnicity. And that's at odds with the anti-racism of their core ideology. This is not a fruitful path to integration, if that was the intention. But then, what is their intention? That's the question.




Many times in the evolution tensions between races or ethnicities have been hijacked by political gangs that took advantage of a hopeless stalemate between parties by expulsion or massacre of one of the parties. So, it is not especially the Master-Slave model (Mod 2:MS), which is the victim of external powers, but any hopeless situation can seduce a third party to incite civil war.

Well, racism-racism is exactly where (Mod 1:NI) is for, so counter-racism is not bad in principle, but certainly by honestly informing the people that they will be provoked into the right direction of counter-racism under the heading of anti-racism. That would be ethical and sincere.

And it must be said (Mod 1:NI) is intended to achieve integration and better not to segregate. "Anti-racism" of pushing agencies thus abuses the functional fixedness of the former sado-masochistic relationship in (Mod 2:MS)which has since evolved into a sadist-sadist environment through the liberation of the slaves (Mod 1:NI)

Thus, anti-racism (Mod 5: IAR) interferes with the functional fixed racist-antiracist relationship nested in the racist-racist model (Mod 1:NI).

'Anti-racism' of (Mod 5: IAR) is therefore in parasitic symbiosis with the racist-racist model of (Mod 1:NI). The aim of this kind of anti-racism is to claim endless penance for the past and at the same time to aggressively demand more and more privileges without consideration. In effect, citizens are being held hostage by a misunderstood external source. It must be emphasized that there is of course also genuine anti-racism.

So, insincere anti-racism is initiated by an outside party with an interest in breaking the status quo, where natural integration is not obvious given the nature of parties to the conflict.

But as said before, Model (Mod 2:MS) could have found some sort of assimilation of the slave culture into the master culture. Then the real meaning of (Mod 5: IAR) would be to disrupt assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war.

Resume: The insincerity is that the external party does not really pursue anti-racism but outright aggression and counter-racism. They only sell their message this way. And in principle counter-racism would be no problem in (Mod 1:NI) if former slaves understood the real intention. However, the intention looks to worsen the relationship from Cultural Segregation (Mod 3:CS) to (Mod 5: IAR) by pretending to aim at (Mod 4:CI)Another option is (Mod 5: IAR) could intend to disrupt assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war. In any case, it is risky to drag a group into an adventure that the majority apparently does not aspire to.







Basic Dimension


(403) Political Correctness split between two religions




Polytheism and Monotheism

Political Correctness is the heir to Christianity. And like a faded flower which disintegrates over time and loses all coherence, the collective name of all those leaves is: Political Correctness.

PC is a Human Religion, built of two consecutive but contradictory developments after Christianity: Individualism from Polytheism (Vanilla-dyad) and Identity politics from Monotheism (tribalism, SM-dyad). This repetitive switch between religions has been going on already for 14 million years.


Sexual Instincts (SI) are functions of Breeding


Former religions sow the seed for the next, which are usually in the opposite direction. There are a number of Sexual Instincts (SI) that lead to counter-religions. But they are all functions of Breeding in the end. 

In the following analysis of the US, Inbreeding and Outbreeding are no longer relevant by itself, yet heavily promoted Racism from PC is a pure function of Inbreeding. In the evolution numerous religions have emerged from all kinds of perspectives, all of which are ultimately functions of Breeding:




PC started from Individualism

PC started with Marxist relativism of cultural norms and values: All cultures were equal and equivalent, leaving individual norms free to vary arbitrary. God no longer existed. It led to multiculturalism, which ultimately amounts to individualism.

PC imposed group norms on individuals

But then PC made a sharp turn towards postmodernism. That is exactly what is said above: Political Correctness is not a single religion but more the concatenation of two conflicting religions under the same name. Fundamentally, they went from polytheism to monotheism and more fundamentally from outbreeding to inbreeding. We must remember these origins to keep track on evolutionary history.

Though PC initially denied absolute moral values according to Marxism, in the rebound they made an exception for group norms, which is amazing and shocking in relation to their earlier individualism. In effect, they hacked into the uprooted individualists and placed them in the group of identity politics.

This transition from individualism to group behavior is well known in the evolution. Normally it returns from atheism to religion, although PC doesn't think they are a religion, because they deny God. But religion is not that simple, Political Correctness is a human religion:




PC's Betrayal to Marx

Marx held that history was a class struggle between capitalists and workers of the proletariat.

And although post modernism implicitly rejected Marx's class struggle between capitalists and proletariat as not an absolute truththey implicitly accepted the same battle between white and colored people. So, they accepted racism as absolute truth, which is correctly seen by the way. Ultimately, they condemned the white man's culture as systemic racism, which is wrong showing post modernists as a group of very inconsistent philosophers. As has been explained by Jordan Peterson.

Again, my claim about what is really happening is the alternation between polytheism and monotheism, between individualism and the grouping of people. And the primary cause of this alternation lies in the perpetual alternation of inbreeding and outbreeding cultures in bipedal evolution, although here breeding itself disappears and systemic racism as a function of inbreeding remains.

So, racism is just one step away from inbreeding but inbreeding itself is no longer an issue:




Today, group identity politics predominate in the US, where the protection of individual rights was the original starting point of PC. These two movements are polar opposites to explain PC's schizophrenia. But here we already conclude that PC has become a tribal culture, a religion that adheres to SM-dyad (read: Hollywood) and expels deviant individuals.

What really happened is that they first disconnected individuals from their religious background and then reattached them to their ethnical or racial group. And guess what, victims didn't even notice this transition. So, Political Correctness simply went over to Racism, a primal function of Inbreeding.

What is the deeper meaning of all this? Of course there will always be racism, because that is a Sexual Instinct (SI) from far before Australopithecus (4.3 Mya; 400cc)

Systematic and systemic racism

But more specifically, we indeed distinguish systematic racism in the US in earlier centuries, in which racism played an instrumental role in increasing wealth and economy of the ruling class. But importantly, racism has never been a fundamental part of Western ideology. It was systematic racism and not systemic racism.

Systematic racism is just a tool but systemic racism is part of the ideology itself (see Jordan Peterson). Nazi Germany was a systemic racist ideology.

And now with PC, systemic racism returns and defines its very ideological basis. And it shows. People stop caring about the state of the country and the economy if only systemic racism can express itself undisturbed. Numerous examples of the loss of authority and the increase in riots in the US confirm that.

To sum it up, every sane person is for equality of opportunity, while equality of outcome deprives people of their incentives and drives the country into economic chaos and collapse. Then, apparently systemic racism is more important than economic prosperity.

We conclude for Western Europe (Muslim importation) and the US (systemic racism) to the same trend in which polytheism (individualism) reverses into monotheism (group thinking).

Also that Political Correctness in Western Europe and in the US are both split religions as clarified above.

SM-dyad and inbreeding

In the evolution, monotheism usually goes together with inbreeding and polytheism with outbreeding. This is because females hate inbreeding and have to be terrorized into cooperation by SM-dyad, which is called 'monotheism'. Monotheism is male heterosexuality, the main God or principal component of sexual space:




Summarizing:

It's clear that while inbreeding is the evolutionary underlying cause of identity politics, it's not the real driver in the US. The driving force here is Racism, which is a pure function of inbreeding of the first bipedal primates, 14 million years ago. 

PC= f(Racism(Inbreeding)|Monotheism).

Therefore, Racism is an intermediate function to Inbreeding. It is the view of this blog that all Sexual Instincts (SI) of bipedal primates are ultimately functions of Breeding, reason why Inbreeding and Outbreeding are called 'Sexual Religions' (SR) in the conscious. So, HR= f(SR) is kind of shorthand meaning that all obvious instincts like for example Racism are ultimately functions of SR, Inbreeding and Outbreeding:




So in the US, basic traits like inbreeding and outbreeding are disguised by new derivatives of sexual behavior over time:







Amazingly, just as Political Correctness in Western Europe falls back on SM-dyad of Inbreeding, so does PC from the United States, but this time through pure Racism.

Europe, Muslim immigration:



As always in the evolution, after a period of Outbreeding or Polytheism, the pointer returns to Inbreeding or Monotheism and vice versa. Although breeding is completely obscured by subsequent derivations of religion in the evolution.




Any polytheistic religion ultimately dissolves into individualism, because cohesion is diluted over groups until there is no group left. Then, new sexual impulses give rise to new religions from our unconscious sexual instincts, such as Fertility Stress, which are ultimately functions of inbreeding or outbreeding:



Although this looks somewhat complicated, it is still the simplest representation of something much more complicated:



Inbreeding and outbreeding are the basic drives from 14 million years of bipedal religion. Does this still make any sense in our time? Yes, because it's in our genes and  85% of the world's religions are still based on breeding:



So what's really going on in the US is that Christianity (read: Political Correctness), as dying polytheistic culture, is beating wildly around in search of new meaning. Also the opposing primary religion of monotheism is involved. As said, this is because Inbreeding and Outbreeding alternate in the evolution, triggered by Sexual Instincts (SI) as Fertility Stress and Racism. And yes, in the United States, Racism as a function of Inbreeding (Monotheism) from Australopithecus is involved in dying Christianity. And that is the main religious disturbance in Political Correctness in the US right now: 

United States:

PC= f(Racism(Inbreeding)|Monotheism).

Western Europe:

PC=f(Muslim immigration(Inbreeding)|Monotheism).

So, its weird but both opposing influences of monotheism and polytheism in the US and Europe are triggered by racial differences. Which opposition causes the absurd looking schizophrenia in Political Correctness at the moment:



Racial differences arise due to the scaling-up of the different races and ethnicities. This creates mixes and conflicts. No wonder human religion is given a new impetus by Racism as a function of Inbreeding.

And out of racist motives PC wants to destroy Western Culture in the US and Europe. But in the States they propagate 'equality of outcome', apparently to destroy the American economy, in which they have already made great progress.

In Western Europe, the first article of the Constitution forbids discrimination, but this article factually protects the greatest discriminatory religion in the world, Islam. This Orwellian double speak is also manifest in PC of the US, which also claims to be against discrimination purely out of a systemic racist ideology.

And of course, mingling all kinds of ethnicities and races leads to Racism, inevitably. So, the deterioration of Christianity in the US is caused by Racism and in Europe by the simple extinction of Christianity as a polytheistic culture in its final stage. But that makes these two situations different in further analyses.

So, while in Europe we have the following fake causes of dying Christianity, in the US we find in Racism a real Sexual Instinct (SI) as perpetrator:

Fake causes of dying Christianity

This all means that what we see as causes of the fall of Western European culture are actually accompanying phenomena. They are the symptoms of a dying culture. They are movements that not coincidentally arose at the right moment in time, but originate from Western culture itself. Muslims have no part in this. So, the following movements are definitely not causal to the fall of Western society, but are signaling the end stage of Western society, dying as a faded flower:

- Women's suffrage.

- Depillarization of churches.

- The Muslim invasion.

- Multiculturalism.

- Political Correctness.

So, Racism is causal and instrumental to the fall of Christianity in the United States.




 Basic Dimension

Christianity is based on the untenable premise that man is sinful by nature. But morality is an unnatural construct. Nature is amoral. So the basic assertion, the premise that dogmatically leads to Christianity, must be wrong to begin with.

The premise of sin is needed to reach to the acceptance of 'blame'. And then guilt leads to the acceptance of penance. And penance is experienced as a masochistic lust in Christianity. For suffering is pleasure in masochism. And that's weird because penance is not normally experienced as a lust.

This all means that the religious concept of Christianity is ultimately based on a sexual lust. Masochism as sexual lust is the underlying trait of Christianity. Therefore, Christianity is based on a fallacy.

Christianity is based on the untenable premise that Christians are sinful, leading to the circular reasoning that they must be sinful or else they would not experience the masochistic lust of penance: suffering. So, the experience of masochistic lust through penance proves the proposition that Christians are sinful. Where people normally do not attach feelings of lust to penance.


Pope John Paul

Pope John Paul whipped himself on the shins daily, until he bled to atone for the sins of the world. It was later claimed that this contributed to his canonization.


With that, masochism became the unspoken Leitmotif of Christianity as extreme counterpart of sadism from Islam:


The Fallacy of Christianity:

1: Sin (Religious Concept)

2: Guilt (Moral Concept)

3: Penance (Legal concept)

4: Masochistic Lust (Sexual Concept)


The real premise is that Christians are masochistic, which is a natural drive for bipedal primates, which invented sadomasochism 14 million years ago. And polytheistic religions tend to masochism because 'goddesses as sexual roles' are also empathically experienced in their conscious. And females have a masochistic drive. So, masochism was already lively in the conscious of pre-Christians:




But SM dyad is weak in polytheism while in Christianity masochism represents the stronger version of monotheism as it is copied from strong SM-dyad from Desert Religions. As a result, Christians were a little embarrassed at first and it was difficult for Northern European peoples to feel sexual satisfaction from being bluntly pounced on by sadism. Therefore, sexuality was disguised and religion was given a metaphysical, esoteric sugar coating.

Desert religions (monotheism) were developed in extreme poverty of the Arabic Peninsula, about 50.000 years ago:



what led to extreme SM-dyad. But polytheism normally develops in temperate zones where the grass is green as in Paradise. It has normal, weak masochism. Anyways, to swap weak masochism with seductive strong masochism became an irresistible challenge for Christians, but they managed very well indeed:



Christians have simply reversed their religious motivation:


The Truth about Christianity:

1: Masochistic Lust (Sexual Concept)

2: Penance (legal concept)

3: Guilt (Moral Concept)

4: Sin (Religious Concept)

Christians have a masochistic lust, leading to the socially acceptable concept of penance compensating for moral guilt from religious sin:



God is dead

The problem with Christianity is that God is dead since Nietzsche and Marxist nihilism:



But then there was no more sin and guilt, while the masochistic lust remained, especially for women. As a result, former Christians, now Political Correctness, cannot satisfy their masochistic lust any longer, a plain sexual drive. And that is why PC has been sucking up Muslim culture for 60 years after the depillarization of churches in Western Europe. To be clear, latent lesbians in top positions in society have been aggressively sucking in the Muslim culture:



PC simply lacked the incentive from feeling pain, to experience masochistic lust as in the old days of Christianity. Four hundred and fifty million Europeans felt the same loss, because they are descended from Christian ancestors. Masochism alone is just a point in space and needs a straight line to a second point (sadism) to give direction and meaning to their lust. So the Muslim immigration saved Christianity from instant death, albeit that it turned into Political Correctness, the follow up religion of Christianity.


Fake causes of dying Christianity

This all means that what we see as causes of the fall of Western culture are actually accompanying phenomena. They are the symptoms of a dying culture. They are movements that not coincidentally arose at the right moment in time, but originate from Western culture itself. Muslims have no part in this. So, the following movements are definitely not causal to the fall of Western society, but are signaling the end stage of Western society, dying as a faded flower:

- Women's suffrage.

- Depillarization of churches.

- The Muslim invasion.

- Multiculturalism.

- Political Correctness.



Suffering is also a precious lust in Islam:




In Islam, suffering is also a precious lust. Especially for women, although men like it too. Anyway, masochistic suffering is the basic feature of Desert Religions, but why? Why do believers in Abrahamic Religions harbor suffering, where it is just alienated in others? What makes these religions so prone to masochism, what appears to be their propelling nuclear drive? That's the subject of this article.





Chimps and bonobos

Monotheism means power in the hands of a single sexual role: male heterosexuality

Christianity took root in Northern European peoples that are not based on inbreeding. And such outbred peoples are usually not monotheistic but polytheistic in nature.

Monotheism usually goes hand in hand with inbreeding, which was the primordial male religion of bipedal primates 14 million years ago. It established the eternal continuation of the male cognate line.

But inbreeding is not a necessary condition for monotheism, because in principle it can also go hand in hand with outbreeding. For example, quadrupedal chimpanzees are reigned by male heterosexual behavior (monotheism), but have no inbreeding because of the exchange of juvenile females with other tribes. And that is because they never migrated over the plains of Africa and never left the trees. They only have hypothetical inbreeding in the male bloodline, which is rather harmless if existing. They also have an extremely varied genome.




And also bonobos can be defined as outbreeding and they are purely polytheistic. In sexual behavior, they are fundamentally different from their cousins, the chimpanzees:












Sexual identity and conscience

Now, seeing gods as sexual roles, monotheistic Islam, for example, recognizes only one sexual role in the conscious, namely male heterosexuality, while the rest of the sexual roles is expelled to the unconscious:




Therefore, many men from Islamic culture do not develop empathy with other sexual roles (e.g. female sexuality) by education, which can lead to masochism hatred and fear and sometimes to the death of 'other sexual roles'. Masochism therefore remains misunderstood by males and then can be projected into females as masochism hatred.

Monotheism inevitably develops into disrespect and lack of empathy with other sexual roles. But what's the  reason? There is something in the relationship of monotheistic males with their God that causes this aberration. It's an unhealthy relationship.

Christianity developed empathy in female sexual roles

Christianity has never been monotheistic, but semi-polytheistic as an antidote to this proposition. That's to say, the relationship of Christians with their God is also questionable, but Christianity followed 'the Teachings of Jesus', who respected 'other sexual roles' (read: women) and led Christianity away from monotheism back to polytheism, the momentum of the swinging clapper between inbreeding and outbreeding religions in the evolution:





The definition of hate

Why masochism itself is projected onto women is obvious, but the definition of hate also states that what one hates in oneself is projected onto others. Misogyny within Islam is therefore a combined factor of female sexuality and a male projection of hatred on non-males.

All this means that monotheism by definition leads to a split sexual conscience, which can be considered a culturally instigated aberration that often leads to cultural psychopathy. The Muslim culture can do nothing about this but to fathom its own hate projection.



But beware, thousands of years of cultural selection and the elimination of unwanted personalities led to an inverse Gaussian Distribution that created a somewhat demographically deformed population:



As a result, relatively more and more natural psychopaths arise from cultural psychopathy simply through elimination of brave females and sensible males, which is worrying:






Islam (sadism) and Christianity (masochism) are the extremes of the sadomasochistic dimension of Desert Religions. Both are completely dependent on breeding according to HR=f(SR): Human religions are functions of breeding. 

In this age they will grow to such enormous proportions that they will become inseparable. This will lead to religious equalization, a clash like regression to the mean. It will be a religious implosion between Islam and Political Correctness, heir of Christianity. We call this coming civil war: Chrislam:




The Muslim culture

Can the Muslim culture still correct this wrong? In principle yes, but then it lapses into polytheism, which violates the core of their faith. 

Only showing learned - but not sincerely meant - respect for women is missing the point. That is a non-binding standard, it is precisely about the hate projection described below. That is the real problem of many Muslim males. That is the core of the Islam drama.


Greek mythology

Conversely to monotheism, all possible gods are experienced empathically in the consciousness of polytheism (Greek mythology). In addition to male gods, there are also goddesses who gave female sexuality a normal place in the conscious of man. Women were masochistic, but certainly also sadistic and heroic:


Artemis and Apollo
Jacques- Louis David


The mirror of worship hidden in the unconscious

With regard to 'masochism hate', it is no coincidence that masochism turns out to be the most important male characteristic in relation to the sadistic God of Desert Religions

Muslims and Christians honor their God in a sado-masochistic relationship. This relationship also contains latent homoerotic characteristics, which is why male homosexuality is also repressed into the unconscious.

Therefore, the sexual mirror image in the unconscious of monotheistic males shows exactly the relationship to their God. 

So, it is not so much about showing outward respect for women and homosexuals, but more about relating the underlying hate factor to the male experience of religion. Failure to teach empathy in other sexual roles in parenting has dire consequences. Misogyny and hatred of homosexuals became the open nerve of the Muslim religion.



And how different this is in polytheism where males have no sado-masochistic relationship with their gods. There, males are in a sado-sado relationship to compete with their gods, dragons and demons for the favors of women.

Therefore, the integrated sexual conscience of polytheistic males is far preferable to the split in monotheism. Healthy competition resulting from empathy with 'all sexual roles' is far preferable to a cringing attitude towards God.

In monotheism there is officially no place for males in sexually oriented female roles, because according to the rule 'gods are sexual roles', two gods would immediately arise on the way to polytheism: male heterosexuality and female sexual roles, both in the conscious. 

And that would torment the Muslim male self projection as gods, which they would have to share with females:



But the dilemma for males in monotheism is there is no other role to worship God beyond a pure feminine role. Only a sado-maso relationship is permissible with males as object to God. But females are already objects in the unconscious. Males do not want to be females, but there is no other option. Otherwise, the male role would naturally lead to a sado-sado relationship with God, competition with God over the females, which is unimaginable in Desert Religions.

That is exactly why monotheistic males are in a split with the relationship to God. Where their masochistic relationship is obvious, it should not be named and is then projected as hatred in women and homosexuals:




This is the core problem of Islam. A normal man to man relationship (competition) with God is impossible within monotheism. Because then God cannot be honored (in submission) and has to be competed. 

So, it's not about politeness to women, but more about understanding the misogyny implemented through religious indoctrination.

In monotheism, males actually have to play the only available female sexual role to their God, for which they are deeply ashamed. Therefore they suppress their masochism, which unlived masochism, however, leads to unconscious masochism hatred of women and homosexuals. It is called 'displacement' in psychology:


When we use displacement, our mind senses that reacting to the original source of our frustration might be unacceptable—even dangerous. Instead, it finds us a less threatening subject that can serve as a safer outlet for our negative feelings.


 

The father-son relationship of Jesus to God is to avoid any latent homoeroticism. But it is a weird and completely unhealthy relationship for a man of 33 years. 

See how Jesus is depicted in his father's arms amidst lovely androgynous creaturesWeak feminine behavior lying in the protective arms of male heterosexual power amidst the whole LGBTQ+ community. It's 'all sexual roles' in a nutshell. So, Christianity has been understood as polytheism all the times. The 'teachings of Jesus' have always been experienced as total polytheism:



It is pure polytheism, what painters painfully sharply felt without drawing the ultimate conclusion: Islam is right: Christianity isn't monotheistic but at least semi-polytheistic.



Masochism hate and fear in Islam

Scenario:

Out of pure hatred, based on displacement, some Muslim males knock masochism out of their wives in SM-dyad that characterizes the husband-wife relationship in Islam. And when she starts screaming pitifully, they panic because of intrusive masochism fear. Because eventually unprocessed masochism threatens to penetrate into their conscious mind.

According to 'Sexual Scales of Religion', just before becoming aware of misunderstood masochism, sadomasochism breaks down again into murderous lust and sexual lust, after which women can be killed to prevent further awareness of unprocessed masochism. Not that this entire process will always be followed, but this this can be the ultimate consequence.


The polytheistic future of Islam

Islam will inevitably fall into 4 groups this century. But with the transition to a two god system for men and women, the sting would have been pulled from monotheism.



God is dead 

Masochism is a point in space with no direction. But with sadism comes the straight line back that directs masochism. Which means Christians without sadism - God is dead through Marxist nihilism - lost direction for their religious (read sexual) satisfaction.



Political Correctness as heir to Christianity therefore looked in Muslim culture for a replacement for their sadistic God, which is exactly the reason of 60 years of Muslim immigration by 450 million European Christians after depillarization of the churches in the 1960s.



But it would be absurd for 450 million European Christians to simply agree to Muslim immigration for 60 years. Which they did anyway. In politics it is sheer impossible to agree on the simplest facts. But not about Muslim immigration. How come? Therefore, an extremely simple explanation must be found, a single factor cause, such as a simple sexual lust.



The Muslim immigration is nothing but the sucking of sadism through Political Correctness, former Christianity. It is the final stage of Christianity falling apart like a withered rose.

However, it is also the natural final stage of any polytheistic religion, because where no cohesive culture is conditional, eventually all cohesion disappears into individualism.

Marxist nihilism is therefore not the cause, but simply ushered in the final phase of the development from polytheism to complete individualism. Because if one no longer distinguishes between marriage partners, then each culture eventually loses its own identity and the individual remains.



Then the overarching morality disappears in multiculturalism. Then gender identity disappears in as many sexual roles as there can be gods within polytheism. With which the LGBTQ+ community demonstrates the culmination of polytheism into complete individualism, in which every individual again practices egotheism and there are no longer generally applicable norms and values.

And that is why God did not die through Marxist relativism or by Nietzsche, but Marxism was simply the right ideology at the right time in the development of this polytheistic culture, turned into multiculturalism without any morals, without any overarching identity and meeting all the conditions for a civil war in which new religions will be created.

Christianity is a religious sugar coating over a rock-hard sexual drive. Christianity is the cuckoo's egg in the nest of former polytheism. And this evil symbiosis will rage until the complete disappearance of the European Judeo-Christian tradition. It will soon degenerate into a civil war that combines the ultimate masochistic gratification of Political Correctness with the ultimate sadism of Islam:



We have analyzed the root cause of the Western guilt complex. We understand the origins of European self-flagellation:


Pope John Paul

Pope John Paul whipped himself on the shins daily, until he bled to atone for the sins of the world. It was later claimed that it contributed to his canonization.


The next question to be asked is: What can we do about this? And how do we get rid of this.

But why would you do anything against this development? It is the consummation of an exhausted polytheistic culture infected with a masochistic fallacy, greedily accepted by 450 million Europeans. Or do you really believe that the Bilderberg conference is behind this. Do you really not believe that 450 million Europeans have held their governments in place for 60 years to fulfill their secret unconscious desires? No, nothing can be done about this as long as the ruling female majority on the basis of women's suffrage, supplemented with masochistic Christian males, keep these governments in function.


Conclusions:


1: Marxist relativism was not the real cause but only the provocation to 'the death of God'. Marxism could have been replaced by any other ideology, which jumped into the hole of polytheistic degeneration on its way to individualism.

2: Likewise, multiculturalism as a result of Marxist nihilism did not come out of the blue. Multiculturalism has no identityno self-propelled momentum, no ideology. Multiculturalism is the result of the degeneration of Western culture itself, tacitly embraced by 450 million former Christians. Multiculturalism is a loose term. It's just a farce in the minds of Europeans. So, multiculturalism is really the result of the degeneration of Western culture itself, quietly embraced by 450 million former Christians.

3: According to this blog's analysis there is an enormous hunger to a sadistic ruler, which does not need to be related to inbreeding, but this just happens to be the case. Another conclusion is that one cannot strive against a sexual masochistic instinct that has infected the whole European population for already 2000 years. It's a hopeless situation. Only civil war can offer a solution, but no one is waiting for that.

4: This analysis shows that the Muslim population is not to blame. They were transported into Western Europe to save Christianity from instant death. And as long as 450 Europeans are unable to see this, the evolution will once again end in a clash between inbred cultures and outbred cultures. There is nothing new under the sun. Human religion is a function of Breeding: HR= f(SR).


                                    


Basic Dimension




(401) Honor killings: cultural transfer or sexual instinct?


Honor killings: cultural transfer or sexual instinct ?

Until now, there was no solution for honor killings:

- We know that talking about honor killings is taboo in Muslim countries. 
- We also know that honor killings happen most in rural areas, where males have less contact with others.
- Then we conclude that cultural transfer of honor killing information among Muslim males is just marginal. 
- But isn't it strange that all these men do about the same thing to young Muslim women of about the same age? And that for already 1400 years? Without any communication?
- Thus Muslim males who have no mutual contact are programmed to do the same thing at about the same age of young Muslim women. But why?
- Our mistaken belief is that honor killings are passed on through culture. But there is still another possibility.
- Because honor killers have no rationally defensible idea of what they are doing, a  possible solution lies in their unconscious.
- And in the unconscious there is only one solution imaginable: an inherited sexual instinct.
- And so we arrive at the reincarnation instinct of Muslim males, responsible for honor killings.
- Then arise two questions: how does reincarnation be suppressed in the unconscious and how do we get it out again?

Even in case of premeditation before the murder, which is sort of family deliberation to discuss the immoral behavior of the daughter, it is males who seek permission to act out of their unconscious motives. In the rare case that women participate in honor killings, it is because of social pressure, since they do not have a reincarnation instinct out of inbreeding.


Honor killings start in the unconscious and are completed in the conscious:

Honor killings come forward from the drive of reincarnation out of inbreeding (cousin marriages). So, find Reinc = f(Inbreed):




But reincarnation is a form of religion. So, Human Religion must also be a form of breeding: HR = f(Breeding = SR):




So, to be able to solve honor killings, Human Religion and Reincarnation must both be functions of Breeding: HR = f(breeding) and Reinc = f(Inbreed). And this is not an arbitrary conclusion. It is groundbreaking insight into bipedal primate religion:






Subsequently, the function Reinc = f(inbreed) is divided between the unconscious (Reinc) and the conscious (f(inbreed)), where f(inbreed) = cousin marriages. Then this is the result:




This blog developed a fairly complete analysis of the reincarnation tragedy in Islam. It comes close to proof of honor killings, but it at least provides enough circumstantial evidence to take the conclusions seriously.

Oddly enough, I started this blog in 2010 with the end result: Human Religion is a Function of Breeding. It might have been a compelling command from my right hemisphere:

(14) De convergentietheorie van het Paradijsverhaal

PETER PAN - 30 JANUARI 2011

http://peterpansparadijs.blogspot.com/ 





In sociologische zin is het paradijsverhaal de blauwdruk van iedere menselijke cultuur. Normen en waarden, of zeden en gewoonten van een volk worden hier uitgedrukt in de boom der kennis van goed en kwaad. Alle volkeren trachten hierdoor het eeuwige leven te beΓ«rven. Daarom wordt het paradijsverhaal zo begrepen dat de boom der kennis, de juiste kennis verschaft om tot de boom des levens te geraken. De juiste kennis in bovenstaand paradijsverhaal is dat overspel en weigering van uithuwelijking verboden worden. Want pas dan bereikt de man genetische onsterfelijkheid op aarde.

Conceptuele Factoranalyse door Formele Synonymie 

We zoeken binnen dit paradijsverhaal naar een gezamenlijke factor tussen de twee bomen door ze naar elkaar toe te praten. Immers er zijn geen data beschikbaar voor een numerieke analyse. Enerzijds kan daarvoor gebruik gemaakt worden van synoniemen : God - onsterfelijkheidmaar anderzijds moeten er ook telkens kleine conceptuele sprongen vanuit het domein van de ene boom naar dat van het andere worden gemaakt. Ziet men de boom der kennis van goed en kwaad als seksualiteit dan is de volgende openingszet ook gelijk de beste: vanuit de seksualiteit springt men dan via de genetische onsterfelijkheid richting de boom des levens, die immers ook onsterfelijkheid betekent. Vervolgens dan via de overgang van het aantal nakomelingen (bruine gebied) naar de aard van de nakomelingen (gele gebied).

Korte theoretische onderbouwing 

Seksualiteit heeft geleid tot ons bestaan. Het is de motor van de vruchtbaarheid. Over generaties heen leidt het in theorie tot het eeuwig voortbestaan van onze genen. Seksualiteit kan daarom worden gezien als de bron van het eeuwige stoffelijke leven. Het verband tussen seksualiteit en onsterfelijkheid fascineerde de vroege mens. Hij zocht naar restricties, opgelegd aan seksualiteit, die de onsterfelijkheid van juist zijn genen zouden kunnen bewerkstelligen. Dit was belangrijk voor de erfopvolging en voor de bloedlijnen binnen de familieclanReligie trachtte op deze wijze het antwoord te vinden op de vraag naar het optimale verband tussen seksualiteit en onsterfelijkheid. Dat zou dan de heilige graal moeten zijn van het eeuwige leven. 

Seksualiteit (boom der kennis) en onsterfelijkheid (boom des levens) vinden samen in de seksreligiefactor een gemeenschappelijke basis die de gronddimensie der ethiek genoemd kan worden (het gele gebied: inbreeding vs. outbreeding)Het is de oerdimensie der seksuele religiositeit in het onbewuste van de man. Op deze onbewuste dimensie zijn God en de Duivel de extremen. God is de personificatie van de richtlijnen voor het huwelijk en de Duivel de bedenker van het overspel. Deze seksreligiefaktor vormt de reglementerende en faciliterende kracht van de seksualiteit in het onbewuste van de man.

Maar de seksreligiefactor doet dit niet voor niets, daar is een reden voor. Hij streeft naar onsterfelijkheid (boom des levens) door genetische replicatie van de soort (boom der kennis). Religie werd de eer van de manDe eer van de familie. Dit door een zo groot en zo sterk mogelijke vertegenwoordiging van de genen van de man in de kinderen van zijn vrouw. Daarmee wordt ook de ordening op deze factor aangegeven: de zo gesatureerd mogelijke vertegenwoordiging van de eigen genen (incest en inteelt) is belangrijker dan een zo groot mogelijke vertegenwoordiging. 

Het verspreiden van de genen van de man werd de eer van de familieclanBloed van talloze vrouwen moest vloeien voor deze pathologische obsessiezijn eerde verspreiding van zijn genen. 

Seksualiteit en onsterfelijkheid werden zo de pijlers van de vroegste ethiek, de bomen die het gewelf des geloofs schraagden. De heilige graal van het geloof werd verpakt in een mythe, de oerwaarheid der wijsheid van de vroegste mens: het verhaal van het paradijs. In dat verhaal staat in een metafoor de verborgen boodschap van hoe met seksualiteit onsterfelijkheid verkregen kan worden.

Het is dit verhaal dat iedere vader zijn zoon vertelde bij zijn seksuele volwassenwording. Het paradijsverhaal was daarom een inwijdingsrite. Het was een dogma om de genenpool van de vader tot onsterfelijkheid in de kinderen van zijn zoon te laten leiden. In de limiet betekent dit het huwelijk tussen zoon en dochter.

Een dogma dat tot ernstige vormen van inteelt zou leiden. Een dogma dat noodgedwongen moest worden verlicht tot dat van neven en nichten. Later werd ook deze minder extreme doelstelling van het paradijsverhaal niet altijd meer gehaald. Totale puurheid van het voortbestaan van de genenpool van de familie bleek onhaalbaar. Wat overbleef was het gebod dat de genen van de vader dan in ieder geval in de genen van zijn kinderen en kleinkinderen zouden voortleven. Dat werd de eer van iedere man. Het werd de volstrekte ban op overspel van de vrouw met steniging als straf.    

Stoning Wikimedia
Tireux de roches


Nog later generaliseerde men de identiteit van de gezamenlijke genenpool naar de overeenkomstige etniciteit of hetzelfde ras, etnische en raciale endogamie. Tenslotte werd de genenpool als identiteit volkomen losgelaten. De seksreligiefactor sublimeerde in een mechanisme om de identiteit van de eigen groep te bestendigen. Tal van ideologieΓ«n en religies kwamen voort uit deze gronddimensie der ethiek, de seksreligiefactor van de man. Ethiek spatte uiteindelijk uiteen in een waaier van normen en waarden, passend bij allerlei groeperingen.


Note: This is the first stage of bipedal primate religion: genetic immortality, where individuals died. Much later, Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) invented the soul to reincarnate in the tribe of his choice and individuals lived forever.

Note: Adam married his sister Eve, who committed adultery with the Serpent, a genetically different male from another tribe. That is inadmissible in the male kin bonded lineage of chimpanzees. It infuriated the God of Inbreeding and Incest and he decided that Eve had to leave the Inbred Paradise, just like Adam for not properly controlling Eve and accepting the Apple, the Hybrid as his child.


And the God of Inbreeding bellowed:


15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Again, the simple fact that Eve was not killed after she tricked Adam with the Serpent's child (the Apple), indicates that this myth must have been from well before the reincarnation period of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). It must even precede Australopithecus (4.3 Mya; 400cc). It's an initiation rite of the first great apes (14 Mya; 300cc), which left the trees for the savannas. Speech was not necessary to understand the danger of adultery.

Note: For the first bipedal primates however, the Tree of Knowledge (inbreeding or outbreeding) was not necessary to choose eternal life (by inbreeding) on the Tree of Life. Especially females had nothing to choose, although they naturally tend to outbreeding. So, for first bipedal primates only one tree suffices: the Tree of Inbreeding, while the Tree of Knowledge was redundant.


While the following refinement doesn't change the effect of the Myth of Paradise, it could theoretically be more accurate:

That changed with Homo sapiens who had to invent the Tree of Knowledge 100,000-50,000 years ago, around the time of the volcano outburst of Mount Toba (74,500). Then autosomal recessive disorders increased dramatically, because the human genome decreased to 3,000 to 10,000 individuals and now people had to choose consciously between the Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life) or the Tree of Outbreeding (Tree of Knowledge of autosomal recessive disorders).


https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/05/210520133722.htm

The spread of modern humans out of Africa about 80,000 years ago is an important period in human history and is often described as a genetic bottleneck. Populations moved out of Africa and into Asia and Europe. The effects of these migrations can be seen even today. Genetic diversity is lower in populations outside of Africa than in African. That Pestera Muierii 1 has high genetic diversity implies that the greatest loss of genetic diversity occurred during the last Ice Age (which ended about 10,000 years ago) instead of during the out of Africa migration.



(237) Mount Toba gave birth to the Tree of Knowledge πŸ”΄πŸ”΄


Then this is our final conclusion about the origin of human religion:




                                                                                           

But what have I done in all those years after 2010?



What have I done in all those years? I searched for a deeper meaning of the first bipedal religions. But it wasn't there. In 2021, I was tremendously pleasured by hearing the Religious Lectures of Dr. Jordan Peterson. And I concluded that a deeper meaning of religion must have been added over time, but not by evolution.

According to Dr. Peterson the Hebrew Bible is a moralistic construct to direct believers to God, who is their bargain with the future, by worshiping Him, by sacrificing now for a better life later. So, God is our unlocking of the future.

So, the Hebrew Bible was not a childish book for stupid believers. Believers were highly intelligent Jews who were illiterate, but further perfectly able to project their own, evolutionary given morals into the mythological stories of Cain and Abel and Abraham and Isaac.

We only arrogantly thought they were simple people. And guess what, Homo naledi wasn't 'a stupid animal' either, as current science would have us believe. Their 'primitive' archaic brains allowed them to survive 14 million years in the African Wilderness, where they defended themselves only with pointed sticks and ropes against felines, while they also had a more civilized religion than we have by burying their dead deep underground near the God of Darknesswhile we throw them into ovens

Thus, there is no forcing causal relationship between morality and evolution, although Dr. Peterson is absolutely right with the Hebrew Bible. From Peterson we learn that Jewish scholars tried to implement an overarching morality on their people, which functioned for more than 2,000 years. So, morality must be implemented time and again on new religions. And there is no law of moral progress in religious evolution. Which means Homo naledi may have had higher moral awareness than current political correctness.

In other words: Sexual Instincts (SI) are inbreeding and outbreeding, which follow each other in the evolution as sexual impulses from the unconscious. They are our basic Sexual Religions (SR), which are complemented with other Sexual Instincts such as SM-dyad, FGM, Racism, Cousin Marriages, Pedophilia, Perpetual Orgasm and Fertility Stress. Such religious impulses are in principle amoral and must be morally shaped every time. And that's what Dr. Peterson showed us with the Hebrew Bible.



A Simplified Introduction to Human Religion




The Sexual Model of Religion













(399) The Archetype of God
(399) The Archetype of God


THE ARCHETYPE OF GOD:

THE GOD SPACE:























(398) Freedom of Speech
(398) Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech



OPTICALLY REVISED:
 October 23, 2020: (34) Freedom of Speech

CHANGED BY ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE:
- November 7, 2020: (34) Freedom of Speech






Without antagonism between
SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad no proper understanding of Human Religion.







Above diagram means that Western feminine institutions are courting Islamic society as if they were receiving Muslim male interest from Islamic institutions for their institutional entity. So, we reshape institutional relations between Christian and Islamic institutions as if it were sexual encounters on a personal level.



(396) The SM-dyad / Vanilla-dyad ratio



The SM-dyad/Vanilla-dyad ratio:

THE SM/VD RATIO:



















(395) The Fundamental Equation in Human Religion



The Fundamental Equation in Human Religion














(394) Human Religion integrates SM-dyad with Breeding



Human Religion Integrates SM-dyad with Breeding




























(393) Women's suffrage absorbed the Muslim Culture in Western Europe











Do we really think that 300 million European Christians brought in tens of millions of Muslims from charity? The Muslim immigration must have a very simple cause, as European States have all agreed on this migration for 60 years. And if we skip charity there must still be a simple cause, then polytheistic masochism remains.

In the sixties there were also many cheap and highly intelligent Asians available from South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and other States. They had only one problem: They were highly civilized moderate people, not to say Buddhists. And Buddhism is not the right other point in space to draw a straight line between Christian masochism and sadism. So, these Asians did not have SM-dyad between husband and wife, that's the problem. 

Do I myself believe this theory? Well, there is no other theory to explain the self chosen suffering of Christians from Muslims' inappropriate behavior in the last sixty years. Of course, I shouldn't be guided by identity politics, but whoever has a better but  conclusive explanation for Muslim immigration, without those silly capitalistic arguments, may say so.

And, of course, benevolent Muslims are completely pushed aside by the ongoing Muslim criminality. But even if we look at the matter in the right proportions, former Christians, now Political Correctness are victims of a major self-inflicted wound. The final conclusion must be that Muslims are not responsible for this migration, it is Christian Europeans themselves who are responsible.

The sado-masochistic tension between monotheism and polytheism, which has built up between Islam and Christianity over a few thousand years, will lead to the collapse of this bubble, because SM cannot be sustained in this way without disturbing its focal point at which SM disintegrates again into murder, manslaughter and sexuality, as has happened already numerous times in bipedal evolution. So, there is nothing new under the sun.








(392) Political Correctness craves for SM-dyad from Muslim culture