Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Assumption 370: Superior and inferior religions.
In nature are no ethical norms, sexuality prevails. Religion falls in the sexual domain, by which 'superior' has a sexual loading. Both super (large) and superior (better) religions are based on inbreeding and incest.
Assumption 369: Super religions.
Super religions are not by definition monotheistic. We need some freedom to vary this concept through the evolution. But especially for inbreeding from Islam the super religion seems to converge to monotheism. This, because the glorification of male heterosexuality to the detriment of other sexual roles is needed to force females to inbreeding, where their natural instinct is outbreeding.
What do we have to say on Der Untergang des Abendlandes from Oswald Spengler (1918)? Nothing, only that there is system in the rise and fall of cultures:
Religions are just ideologies. They rise on escaping from monotheism and fall as faded flowers after reaching their asymptote in individualism from polytheism, at which they lose their endogamous core, their bonding force and every person chooses his own god, his own sexual role and gender:
And with so many gods - or sexual roles - groups are obsolete, since groups lose a single monotheistic God as greatest denominator. And that's why idiots like Marx with his Marxist relativism got their chance to ruin the endogamous core of Christian culture. Marx was not the cause of the fall of Christianity, but just a symptom of a fully developed Christian culture, which died like a faded rose:
The Alpha male theory
Stated above is a simple theory of how cultures come and go, but the explanation fundamentally lies in the inbreeding instinct of the Alpha male versus the outbreeding instinct of females.
In nature the Alpha male cannot really affect the survival of the group by inbreeding, because of his limited reign. Furthermore females are free to leave the group and to be adulterous:
But for Homo sapiens (350 Ma; 1400cc) it is quite a different story. Inferior males can be family heads for decades and they need not prove themselves physically. Also the shrinking human genome variation causes more autosomal recessive disorders than in earlier hominids. And in Muslim inbreeding cultures females are prisoners of the system and cannot escape. So, for humans inbreeding is disastrous:
Further specified, cultures come and go with the regularity of the clock, of which the pendulum swings between monotheism and polytheism:
Polytheism is dead-end because it gets bogged down into moral values, which are not viable and do not exist in nature:
In the end outbreeding cultures fall apart into individualism:
Super religions and superior religions
Super religions have a fundamental influence on the human race. We concluded that only religions based on inbreeding can endure the human evolution. Inbreeding was the only sexual trait of fundamental importance for bipedal Australopiths, which were less able to exchange juvenile females with other groups than quadrupedal primates as chimps high in the trees.
Inbreeding is the only trait which is presented in sexuality and in religion:
Other religious concepts are magical derivatives from sexual culture with earthly reincarnation as most impressive example:
Well, the question is if super religions are also superior religions. A super religion is big and timeless like the inbreeding culture of Islam. But is Islam superior to Christianity?
Clearly, this is a matter of religious taste and completely subjective.
We can build ethical norms from civilization but remember that most murders were committed in the name of Christ during countless wars in the last centuries.
[ No, that is incorrect. Most conservative estimates are that Islam killed at least 300 million unbelievers in history. Mao was most productive.]
A major difference between Islam and Christianity is the former is based on a gruesome sexual instinct, while the latter claims transcendence and high ethical standards. Christianity is said to be a modern religion while Islam is based on a primal sexual instinct.
But do we have to judge religion on the measure of ethical philosophy or pure sexuality?
Assumption 370: Superior and inferior religions.
In nature are no ethical norms, sexuality prevails. Religion falls in the sexual domain, by which 'superior' has a sexual loading. Both super (large) and superior (better) religions are based on inbreeding and incest.
Christianity
Can this article be of any help? Yes, because it advises Christianity to build another endogamous core, just like Melania Trump is trying to revive, but that only works in the Rust Belt of the USA, not in Europe anymore, where Christianity already died.
Without a new and modernized endogamous core Christianity will be lost for ever:
We give three examples of cultures that lost their endogamous heart to inbreeding cultures, to inbred societies which exist just because of their endogamous hearts.
Christianity
The first culture is Christianity which is a well known example of the above trend:
Christians still do not understand what is happening and they think to be morally superior to Islam. But in nature there is no morality and their culture will crumble and sink to mediocre level of Islam.
It is the former Christian females who are in charge after woman's suffrage from the last century. They don't know their hidden sexual drives are much stronger than their crazy and unrealistic leftist reasoning:
Sodom and Gomorrah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodom_and_Gomorrah
Sodom and Gomorrah were cities mentioned in the Book of Genesis[2] and throughout the Hebrew Bible,[3] the New Testament, and in the deuterocanonical books, as well as in the Quran and the hadith.[4]
Divine judgment by God was passed upon Sodom and Gomorrah and two neighboring cities, which were completely consumed by fire and brimstone.
Sodom and Gomorrah have been used historically and today as metaphors for vice and homosexuality, although a close reading of the text and other Ancient Near Eastern sources suggest that this association may be incorrect.[8]
The story has therefore given rise to words in several languages. These include the English word sodomy, which is used in sodomy laws to describe sexual "crimes against nature", namely anal or oral sex (particularly homosexual), or bestiality.[9][10][11] Some Islamic societies incorporate punishments associated with Sodom and Gomorrah into sharia.[12]
Sodom and Gomorrah's political situation is described when Lot had encamped in Sodom's territory. At this time, "the men of Sodom [were] wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly"
Sodom and Gomorrah were spoiled of their goods, and captives were taken, including Lot. The tide of war turned when Lot's uncle, Abraham, gathered an elite force that slaughtered King Chedorlaomer's forces in Hobah, north of Damascus. The success of his mission freed the cities of the plain from under Elam's rule.
The story of the judgment of Sodom and Gomorrah is told in Genesis 18–19. Three men, thought by most commentators to have been angels appearing as men,[citation needed] came to Abraham in the plains of Mamre. After the angels received the hospitality of Abraham and Sarah, "the Lord" revealed to Abraham that he would confirm what he had heard against Sodom and Gomorrah, "and because their sin is very grievous".
In response, Abraham inquired of the Lord if he would spare the city if 50 righteous people were found in it, to which the Lord agreed he would not destroy it for the sake of the righteous yet dwelling therein. Abraham then inquired of God for mercy at lower numbers (first 45, then 40, then 30, then 20, and finally at 10), with the Lord agreeing each time.[39] Two angels were sent to Sodom to investigate and were met by Abraham's nephew Lot, who convinced the angels to lodge with him, and they ate with Lot.
Genesis 19:4–5 described what followed, which confirmed its end:
4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both young and old, all the people from every quarter.
5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him: 'Where are the men that came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.'
(NRSV: know them, NIV: can have sex with them, NJB: can have intercourse with them).
Lot refused to give his guests to the inhabitants of Sodom and, instead, offered them his two virgin daughters "which have not known man" and to "do ye to them as [is]good in your eyes". However, they refused this offer, complained about this alien, namely Lot, giving orders, and then came near to break down the door. Lot's angelic guests rescued him and struck the men with blindness and they informed Lot of their mission to destroy the city. Then (not having found even 10 righteous people in the city), they commanded Lot to gather his family and leave. As they made their escape, one angel commanded Lot to "look not behind thee" (singular "thee"). However, as Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed with brimstone and fire from the Lord, Lot's wife looked back at the city, and she became a pillar of salt.
Pre Muslim ancestral idols
Islam is fully monotheistic in that Allah represents male heterosexuality:
But there are reasons to suspect in ancient times there were also female idols, like in Voodoo.
Below we show an example from the Jewish culture from before Islam:
Super religions are not by definition monotheistic. If only male ancestors are worshipped, we speak of monotheism of male heterosexuality as a single god. But sometimes also female idols were worshipped in inbreeding cultures:
So, if there were more sexual roles in the conscious from pre-Muslims (2nd Paradise culture), then their belief was semi-polytheistic:
Forcing Muslims to believe in Heavenly reincarnation while forbidding earthly reincarnation defines the horrible power of the sexual dictatorship of Islam. And that's why Muslims desperately regress to the Sacrifice Feast every year, when they unconsciously celebrate their liberation from Islam and their return to earthly reincarnation:
.jpg)
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Assumption 370: Superior and inferior religions.
In nature are no ethical norms, sexuality prevails. Religion falls in the sexual domain, by which 'superior' has a sexual loading. Both super (large) and superior (better) religions are based on inbreeding and incest.
Super religions are not by definition monotheistic. We need some freedom to vary this concept through the evolution. But especially for inbreeding from Islam the super religion seems to converge to monotheism. This, because the glorification of male heterosexuality to the detriment of other sexual roles is needed to force females to inbreeding, where their natural instinct is outbreeding.
What do we have to say on Der Untergang des Abendlandes from Oswald Spengler (1918)? Nothing, only that there is system in the rise and fall of cultures:
Religions are just ideologies. They rise on escaping from monotheism and fall as faded flowers after reaching their asymptote in individualism from polytheism, at which they lose their endogamous core, their bonding force and every person chooses his own god, his own sexual role and gender:
And with so many gods - or sexual roles - groups are obsolete, since groups lose a single monotheistic God as greatest denominator. And that's why idiots like Marx with his Marxist relativism got their chance to ruin the endogamous core of Christian culture. Marx was not the cause of the fall of Christianity, but just a symptom of a fully developed Christian culture, which died like a faded rose:
The Alpha male theory
Stated above is a simple theory of how cultures come and go, but the explanation fundamentally lies in the inbreeding instinct of the Alpha male versus the outbreeding instinct of females.
In nature the Alpha male cannot really affect the survival of the group by inbreeding, because of his limited reign. Furthermore females are free to leave the group and to be adulterous:
But for Homo sapiens (350 Ma; 1400cc) it is quite a different story. Inferior males can be family heads for decades and they need not prove themselves physically. Also the shrinking human genome variation causes more autosomal recessive disorders than in earlier hominids. And in Muslim inbreeding cultures females are prisoners of the system and cannot escape. So, for humans inbreeding is disastrous:
Further specified, cultures come and go with the regularity of the clock, of which the pendulum swings between monotheism and polytheism:
Polytheism is dead-end because it gets bogged down into moral values, which are not viable and do not exist in nature:
In the end outbreeding cultures fall apart into individualism:
Super religions and superior religions
Super religions have a fundamental influence on the human race. We concluded that only religions based on inbreeding can endure the human evolution. Inbreeding was the only sexual trait of fundamental importance for bipedal Australopiths, which were less able to exchange juvenile females with other groups than quadrupedal primates as chimps high in the trees.
Inbreeding is the only trait which is presented in sexuality and in religion:
Other religious concepts are magical derivatives from sexual culture with earthly reincarnation as most impressive example:
Well, the question is if super religions are also superior religions. A super religion is big and timeless like the inbreeding culture of Islam. But is Islam superior to Christianity?
Clearly, this is a matter of religious taste and completely subjective.
We can build ethical norms from civilization but remember that most murders were committed in the name of Christ during countless wars in the last centuries.
[ No, that is incorrect. Most conservative estimates are that Islam killed at least 300 million unbelievers in history. Mao was most productive.]
A major difference between Islam and Christianity is the former is based on a gruesome sexual instinct, while the latter claims transcendence and high ethical standards. Christianity is said to be a modern religion while Islam is based on a primal sexual instinct.
But do we have to judge religion on the measure of ethical philosophy or pure sexuality?
Assumption 370: Superior and inferior religions.
In nature are no ethical norms, sexuality prevails. Religion falls in the sexual domain, by which 'superior' has a sexual loading. Both super (large) and superior (better) religions are based on inbreeding and incest.
Christianity
Can this article be of any help? Yes, because it advises Christianity to build another endogamous core, just like Melania Trump is trying to revive, but that only works in the Rust Belt of the USA, not in Europe anymore, where Christianity already died.
Without a new and modernized endogamous core Christianity will be lost for ever:
We give three examples of cultures that lost their endogamous heart to inbreeding cultures, to inbred societies which exist just because of their endogamous hearts.
Christianity
The first culture is Christianity which is a well known example of the above trend:
It is the former Christian females who are in charge after woman's suffrage from the last century. They don't know their hidden sexual drives are much stronger than their crazy and unrealistic leftist reasoning:
Sodom and Gomorrah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodom_and_Gomorrah
Sodom and Gomorrah were cities mentioned in the Book of Genesis[2] and throughout the Hebrew Bible,[3] the New Testament, and in the deuterocanonical books, as well as in the Quran and the hadith.[4]
Divine judgment by God was passed upon Sodom and Gomorrah and two neighboring cities, which were completely consumed by fire and brimstone.
Sodom and Gomorrah have been used historically and today as metaphors for vice and homosexuality, although a close reading of the text and other Ancient Near Eastern sources suggest that this association may be incorrect.[8]
The story has therefore given rise to words in several languages. These include the English word sodomy, which is used in sodomy laws to describe sexual "crimes against nature", namely anal or oral sex (particularly homosexual), or bestiality.[9][10][11] Some Islamic societies incorporate punishments associated with Sodom and Gomorrah into sharia.[12]
Sodom and Gomorrah's political situation is described when Lot had encamped in Sodom's territory. At this time, "the men of Sodom [were] wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly"
Sodom and Gomorrah were spoiled of their goods, and captives were taken, including Lot. The tide of war turned when Lot's uncle, Abraham, gathered an elite force that slaughtered King Chedorlaomer's forces in Hobah, north of Damascus. The success of his mission freed the cities of the plain from under Elam's rule.
The story of the judgment of Sodom and Gomorrah is told in Genesis 18–19. Three men, thought by most commentators to have been angels appearing as men,[citation needed] came to Abraham in the plains of Mamre. After the angels received the hospitality of Abraham and Sarah, "the Lord" revealed to Abraham that he would confirm what he had heard against Sodom and Gomorrah, "and because their sin is very grievous".
In response, Abraham inquired of the Lord if he would spare the city if 50 righteous people were found in it, to which the Lord agreed he would not destroy it for the sake of the righteous yet dwelling therein. Abraham then inquired of God for mercy at lower numbers (first 45, then 40, then 30, then 20, and finally at 10), with the Lord agreeing each time.[39] Two angels were sent to Sodom to investigate and were met by Abraham's nephew Lot, who convinced the angels to lodge with him, and they ate with Lot.
Genesis 19:4–5 described what followed, which confirmed its end:
4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both young and old, all the people from every quarter.
5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him: 'Where are the men that came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.'
(NRSV: know them, NIV: can have sex with them, NJB: can have intercourse with them).
Lot refused to give his guests to the inhabitants of Sodom and, instead, offered them his two virgin daughters "which have not known man" and to "do ye to them as [is]good in your eyes". However, they refused this offer, complained about this alien, namely Lot, giving orders, and then came near to break down the door. Lot's angelic guests rescued him and struck the men with blindness and they informed Lot of their mission to destroy the city. Then (not having found even 10 righteous people in the city), they commanded Lot to gather his family and leave. As they made their escape, one angel commanded Lot to "look not behind thee" (singular "thee"). However, as Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed with brimstone and fire from the Lord, Lot's wife looked back at the city, and she became a pillar of salt.
Islam is fully monotheistic in that Allah represents male heterosexuality:
But there are reasons to suspect in ancient times there were also female idols, like in Voodoo.
Below we show an example from the Jewish culture from before Islam:
Super religions are not by definition monotheistic. If only male ancestors are worshipped, we speak of monotheism of male heterosexuality as a single god. But sometimes also female idols were worshipped in inbreeding cultures:
Assumption 360: Judaism was not completely monotheistic, for it appears in ancient times Yahwey had a wife, the fertility Goddess Asherah. It means, only Islam is a pure monotheistic religion and Judaism accepted the compromise of Abraham in which earthly idols were admitted if God in Heaven was the primus inter pares. (1:18:12/2:56:49)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIweWqsmjZE https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Deuteronomy-Chapter-5/
So, if there were more sexual roles in the conscious from pre-Muslims (2nd Paradise culture), then their belief was semi-polytheistic:
Forcing Muslims to believe in Heavenly reincarnation while forbidding earthly reincarnation defines the horrible power of the sexual dictatorship of Islam. And that's why Muslims desperately regress to the Sacrifice Feast every year, when they unconsciously celebrate their liberation from Islam and their return to earthly reincarnation:
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment