Sunday, 5 August 2018

(247) Prophets are the real gods of the people

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive



Assumption 371: Prophets as gods.
Prophets who protect 'other sexual roles' belong to the exogamous mantle and by definition are polytheistic gods (Jesus and Abraham). 
But prophets like Moses and Mohammed are placed next to God in the endogamous core and are monotheistic gods.


Prophets are the real gods of the people

There have been thousands of gods in human evolution. 



Gods are completely fabricated entities to deliver messages to believers. Not unusual are the hellfire and brimstone sermons to keep the sexual behavior of the people in check.

These gods cannot be talked to by normal people, because nobody would believe. Therefore are prophets who communicate the rules of God to believers. Prophets might also be completely invented, and often 'hear voices', what accompanies schizophrenia and psychosis. 

But to be clear, prophets must also be seen as gods, as human gods. Prophets have much more power than gods. Prophets materialize divine power into human proportions. It is basically a transfer of divine power to the sexual dictatorship subjugating the group. Gods and prophets are an indivisible unity. Without gods, no prophets, without prophets, no gods. They form a psychological identity for transforming power to the ruling class.

Important prophets for Islam and Christianity are Mohammed and Jesus. And Moses for Judaism. And it is not for nothing that the religious point of gravity lies with these prophets. Therefore we are not interested in gods so much, but more in their prophets. Prophets are the real gods.

Now remember, Jesus became a polytheistic prophet after being first indoctrinated with the distinctive monotheistic homo-erotic relationship with his Jewish God. Not to say Jesus was gay, but the Romans who designed Christianity decided to frame him that way. And so, Jesus became the savior from 'other sexual roles':



While praying, believers from desert religions have a one way communication with their God, without ever getting answers. They think God exists because prophets have received his commanded laws. Then, while praying they think to be able to predict God's reactions. But they only speak in role play to themselves. Hence, this is a completely fake relationship. God is fabricated by the ruling class which appointed the prophets as well.

Hence, monotheism is insane and sick, it is meant to terrorize the people and dictate sexual laws they have to obey. So, monotheistic prophets like Moses, Mohammed and the homosexual clergy are feared but not really loved by the people.



The inverse sexual domain

Religion is the scourge for the people. They are so brainwashed that they like their prisonership. The gods from the ruling class are always in the endogamous core and prophets who are loved by the people are placed in the exogamous mantle. For example Christ is in the mantle with 'other sexual roles'. Jesus is the actual God of Christians, hence it is called 'Christianity':



Prophets who are not feared but liked by the people are their real gods.
To find these gods we simply take the inverse of sexual space:



Then we get this picture:



It turns out the real gods of the people are Jesus for Christianity and Abraham for Islam. The 'inverse' is like the change from patriarchies into matriarchies:



From the Alpha male model to the Alpha female model:



Matriarchies are found with elephants and bonobos.

In fact in our times we witness the emergence of the matriarchate from Western society, acquired by latent lesbian feminists, ruining Western culture after women's suffrage from last century:


It must be said, matriarchies are much more harmonious than patriarchies, bonobo societies are a safehaven for LGBT: 



But the problem is that matriarchies are not working for bipedal primates like us, descended from Australopiths. The latter were addicted to SM-dyad caused by their inbreeding culture, while quadrupedal bonobos flourish with Vanilla-dyad:



So, Christianity in the long run is not working for humans. As a faded rose it will reach its masochistic asymptote in atheism, after which the group will fall apart, as prey for Islam, which always has remained a group:





Gods as sexual roles

In addition to being loved by the people there is still another, but weaker criterion to classify prophets. We know in Christianity God has the male heterosexual role, while Jesus is framed into a somewhat masochistic and not very masculine role:


This is an additional reason to place Jesus into the exogamous mantle. And two sexual roles in the conscious makes Christianity semi-polytheistic:


But the homosexual clergy definitely is not heterosexual and yet is placed into the endogamous core next to God. This is a special case in which the clergy took over the role of God, who is said to live in some parallel universe. Other reasons can be found elsewhere on this blog. 

Another exception to the 'rule' of 'the same sexual role' is Abraham, who is thought to be heterosexual but is still placed in the exogamous mantle, since he fought for 'other sexual roles'. Hence, 'the same sexual role' is only a weak indicator in addition to 'be loved by the people', which is the main classifier.

Assumption 371: Prophets as gods.
Prophets who protect 'other sexual roles' belong to the exogamous mantle and by definition are polytheistic gods (Jesus and Abraham). 
But prophets like Moses and Mohammed are placed next to God in the exogamous core and are monotheistic gods.



Mohammed has the same male heterosexual role as Allah and both are placed into the endogamous core. Both are respected but not loved by Muslims. Only female Allah is loved by Muslim females as a father figure. And because Mohammed and Allah are thought to have the same sexual role, Islam must be seen as monotheistic:






As said before, Jesus conflicts with the sexual role of God. Jesus is explicitly the savior from other sexual roles, just like Abraham (see Sodom and Gomorra, ADDENDUM 1 below). For this reason Jesus and Abraham are placed into the exogamous mantle while Moses and Mohammed belong to the endogamous core.



Hence we conclude, protecting 'other sexual roles' means to be loved by the people. It means to choose for polytheism. Choosing for monotheism generally means male hetero sexuality, completed with oppression, sadistic aggression and failure to empathize with other sexual roles.





ADDENDUM 1

Sodom and Gomorrah



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodom_and_Gomorrah

Sodom and Gomorrah were cities mentioned in the Book of Genesis[2] and throughout the Hebrew Bible,[3] the New Testament, and in the deuterocanonical books, as well as in the Quran and the hadith.[4]

Divine judgment by God was passed upon Sodom and Gomorrah and two neighboring cities, which were completely consumed by fire and brimstone.

Sodom and Gomorrah have been used historically and today as metaphors for vice and homosexuality, although a close reading of the text and other Ancient Near Eastern sources suggest that this association may be incorrect.[8]

The story has therefore given rise to words in several languages. These include the English word sodomy, which is used in sodomy laws to describe sexual "crimes against nature", namely anal or oral sex (particularly homosexual), or bestiality.[9][10][11] Some Islamic societies incorporate punishments associated with Sodom and Gomorrah into sharia.[12]

Sodom and Gomorrah's political situation is described when Lot had encamped in Sodom's territory. At this time, "the men of Sodom [were] wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly"

Sodom and Gomorrah were spoiled of their goods, and captives were taken, including Lot. The tide of war turned when Lot's uncle, Abraham, gathered an elite force that slaughtered King Chedorlaomer's forces in Hobah, north of Damascus. The success of his mission freed the cities of the plain from under Elam's rule.

The story of the judgment of Sodom and Gomorrah is told in Genesis 18–19. Three men, thought by most commentators to have been angels appearing as men,[citation needed] came to Abraham in the plains of Mamre. After the angels received the hospitality of Abraham and Sarah, "the Lord" revealed to Abraham that he would confirm what he had heard against Sodom and Gomorrah, "and because their sin is very grievous".

In response, Abraham inquired of the Lord if he would spare the city if 50 righteous people were found in it, to which the Lord agreed he would not destroy it for the sake of the righteous yet dwelling therein. Abraham then inquired of God for mercy at lower numbers (first 45, then 40, then 30, then 20, and finally at 10), with the Lord agreeing each time.[39] Two angels were sent to Sodom to investigate and were met by Abraham's nephew Lot, who convinced the angels to lodge with him, and they ate with Lot.

Genesis 19:4–5 described what followed, which confirmed its end:

4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both young and old, all the people from every quarter.
5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him: 'Where are the men that came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.'

(NRSV: know them, NIVcan have sex with themNJB: can have intercourse with them).

Lot refused to give his guests to the inhabitants of Sodom and, instead, offered them his two virgin daughters "which have not known man" and to "do ye to them as [is]good in your eyes". However, they refused this offer, complained about this alien, namely Lot, giving orders, and then came near to break down the door. Lot's angelic guests rescued him and struck the men with blindness and they informed Lot of their mission to destroy the city. Then (not having found even 10 righteous people in the city), they commanded Lot to gather his family and leave. As they made their escape, one angel commanded Lot to "look not behind thee" (singular "thee"). However, as Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed with brimstone and fire from the Lord, Lot's wife looked back at the city, and she became a pillar of salt. 



                                      


cc-by-nc-sa

No comments:

Post a Comment