Monday, 20 February 2017

(153) Differential regression of the Muslim culture

Basic Dimension 

Number Archive

The three-stage rocket of Paradise culture

The disintegration of Islamic culture can be monitored, but not without theory. And it is too easy to think Sharia is not needed. This scourge of the third Paradise culture is needed to oppress the evil of the second and the first. We have to deal with a people which are completely different from normal peoples by unnatural selection: inbreeding. 

We cannot simply say all humans are the same. Heavy and systematic inbreeding during millions of years has left deep scars on the characters of Muslims. Culture and ethnicity interact and can deform DNA by deliberate selection of suitable individuals. Therefore, Muslims will not easily assimilate into Western society. This mess has been known already for a thousand years and far before the onset of Marxism nihilism.

Profiling Paradise Culture

We will work with landmarks of Paradise culture which are clearly visible without any doubt. Then, we have three infamous landmarks of this ancient culture:

1: Sharia.
2: Cousin marriages.
3: Murder of other sexual roles (e.g. women and unbelievers).

Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc) were the first Paradise culture to put into practice male kin bonded lineage completed with fresh juvenile females:

But in a later stage they also had 'religion' to steer sexual culture. On the one hand they enforced 'genetic saturation by inbreeding' to counteract the loss of tribal identity. And with too many autosomal recessive disorders they corrected their policies by the exchange or capture of juvenile females. In our view this was a rational decision and not based on an irresistible instinct:

In the second Paradise culture (2 Ma - 1400 ya) we placed two inbreeding instincts which might be essentially the same. The first is from the start of this culture about two million years ago and concerned inbred bodies meant for reincarnation of ancestors. The second is more at the end and is about cousin marriages (50 ya):

Both inbreeding instincts mixed male and female nuDNA (autosomal) within the same family. Scheme of different cultures below:

In our view, two million years ago humanlike beings had enough brains to grasp earthly reincarnation, on which tribal daughters were 'reused' in the male lineage to produce more saturated inbred bodies for the reincarnation of tribal ancestors (Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc)). But of course, 'religion' sanctioned sexual culture where not always fresh juvenile females were available.

So already in this first phase, DNA of daughters was double mixed with male kin bonded DNA. This means the same female DNA was implemented several times onto the male lineage. This is insane and abnormal in the animal world.

In later cousin marriages females were deliberately chosen from the own family:

Inbred bodies (2 Ma) and cousin marriages (50 ka) are both based on instincts. The difference is inbred bodies were produced for religious reasons, for ancestors wanted to reincarnate into saturated tribal DNA. While in case of cousin marriages we postulate there simply were no females available on the Arabian Peninsula for the exchange with own juveniles. Then, an instinct mutation likely took place within 10.000 years on the Arabian Peninsula.

As mentioned earlier, both inbreeding instincts might be essentially the same. The Peninsula was the last station in the evolution before pre-Muslims (mtDNA L3N) fanned out across the world, demonstrating everywhere the same characteristic
cousin marriage-drive in autosomal DNA behavior accompanied by mtDNA L3N (N below). Notice, the inbreeding instinct vanished by outbreeding among Western cultures, although a lot of inbred pockets can still be found.

White blocks are mtDNA L3N:

It is very well possible cousin marriages are perfected in the last ten thousand years, this for socio-economic reasons. But the important point is this basic instinct already originated from about 2 million years ago and socio-economic backgrounds definitely cannot explain honor killings and acid attacks. 

Muslims mostly are relatively poor people from whom not much can be inherited. Further, cousin marriages are not rational or realistic since they are difficult to maintain across generations without fooling yourself with far distant cousins. By which is not said that autosomal recessive disorders can not accumulate over time:


Cousin marriages are not always possible:

BTW, the father of Sadia Sheikh was a shopkeeper. Would you let shoot your daughter three bullets into her stomach for the lousy money involved in your shop? Cousin marriages are not rational, not just irrational, they are caused by an instinct. Besides, I doubt if the parents of Sadia ever knew about her planned killing, but that aside. 

Compared to inbred bodies of Homo erectus - with less rules about gradation of cousins - first cousin marriages of Home sapiens run along the edge of the ravine of autosomal recessive disorders. They might be seen as a further sophistication of inbred bodies in general:

Concluding, 'cousin marriages' as deliberate mingling of male and female autosomal DNA is characteristic for the second Paradise culture.

Because we have postulated an inbreeding instinct in the second Paradise culture, we are entitled to let Islamic culture regress to this culture if Islam (read Sharia) vanishes from Western Muslim populations. And indeed, the power of Sharia shrinks in the Western world already for decades. 

Muslims still call themselves 'Muslims' but that's another story. As an incrowd group they unite under the denominator of 'Islam' as they always did for 1400 years. But their 'religion' has no substance. They seldom read the Koran and in the mosque they are just told how to behave next week while they unconsciously see Islam as a scourge on their beloved earthly reincarnation:

In fact their religion is an ideology of conquest. Their religion gives rules how 'other sexual roles' must behave sexually, which is the exact definition of religion.

Two aspects of inbreeding

Assumption 280

1: Inbreeding promotes tribal identity by genetic immortality in descendants since the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc), the primal human-creature religion. Tribal identity revives in Muslim cultures in Western society today. 

2: And since Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) inbreeding also promotes the earthly reincarnation of Muslim fathers into descendants of their children.

Inbreeding promotes tribal identity and earthly reincarnation. The overarching goal of inbreeding is underlining the incrowd culture of Muslims.

So, if Muslims regress to earlier Paradise cultures we have two choices:

1) Tribal identity from the first Paradise culture of the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc)
2) Reincarnation into inbred bodies of the second culture of Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc).

Now remember, our postulated inbreeding instinct has never disappeared in nowadays Muslims because they always interbred with other Muslims. This means inbreeding itself might have been diluted in religious endogamy, but not the inbreeding instinct. By this instinct suitable characters are chosen for millions of years which have distorted the nature of the people. And this instinct comes free when Muslims reject Islam. Islam, which as third Paradise culture oppressed the second for 1400 years.

Staging Islamic culture

Sharia is followed by older Muslims:

Western Europe without Sharia:

We postulate the following: if Islam loses authority the Muslim-society will regress to the former state of second Paradise culture, recognizable as cousin marriages (earthly reincarnation): 

But we also know from our earlier comparison between Negroes and Muslims, that sustainable inbreeding needs a rigid and stable society over decades, across centuries. And since Sub-Saharan Negroes always had a chaotic society they never reached continuity and were stuck to FGM (Female Genital Mutilation). So, sustainable inbreeding demands an orderly and rigid society in which nothing changes.

Now we all have seen the tremendous cultural shock Muslims have got coming from their stone age culture into Western dynamic society. This means sexual culture changed in the first place and secondly their religion is on risk. But what is their religion? Difficult to say, to grasp, it is more a way of life as a group together.

If they must regress to the second Paradise culture they need a stable and rigid environment to practice inbreeding by cousin marriages across generations as in their home lands. 

This means cousin marriages as a regression can be found only in the age category of 30-45 years, where fathers enforce their daughters to arranged marriages to project themselves unconsciously into earthly reincarnation in descendants: 
Hay Festival 2011: Professor risks political storm over Muslim 'inbreeding’ 
Prof Steve Jones, one of Britain’s most eminent scientists, has warned that the level of inbreeding among the nation’s Muslims is endangering the health of future generations.

The geneticist said that it was common in the Islamic world for men to marry their nieces and cousins. He said that Bradford has a particular problem and warned that it could affect the health of children born into these marriages.
“It is common in the Islamic world to marry your brother’s daughter, which is actually closer than marrying your cousin.(..) We should be concerned about that as there can be a lot of hidden genetic damage. Children are much more likely to get two copies of a damaged gene.

He added: “Bradford is very inbred. There is a huge amount of cousins marrying each other there.” Research in Bradford has found that babies born to Pakistani women are twice as likely to die in their first year as babies born to white mothers, with genetic problems linked to inbreeding identified as a “significant” cause.

Studies have found that within the city, more than 70 per cent of marriages are between relations, with more than half involving first cousins.
First cousin marriages in Pakistani communities leading to 'appalling' disabilities among children.
"You go to any such family and there will be four or five children, at least one or two of whom will have some disability. That is absolutely unacceptable, and if we cannot do anything about it, is it fair to the children?"
First-cousin marriages, which are are legal in the UK, are practised within Britain’s Pakistani community, as well as among some Arab and African families. Medical data previously suggested that while British Pakistanis were responsible for 3 per cent of all births, they accounted for 30 per cent of British children born with a genetic illness.

Moroccan criminality 

From the third generation Moroccan Muslims in Western Europe we know they are not really religious any longer. They don't visit any mosque and are rebellious against the older generations. Also they did not learn a profession and prefer to live from social security or pure criminality. 

In fact they did not invest into a stable life to raise a family. And this means they cannot regress to cousin marriages from the second Paradise culture. Remember, cousin marriages is just a marker of this culture but there are many more features.

Well, in case of this Moroccan youth it is quite clear males regress much further to the third Paradise culture of murder and manslaughter:

Also they are completely intolerant against 'other sexual roles', e.g. blond women and homosexuals. They do not fancy about earthly reincarnation, but about 72 blond Christian whores in an undetermined afterlife, still called the Heaven of Allah:

And this means when Sharia loses authority, this Muslim-society is plunged into chaos, and these young people regress straight back to the third Paradise culture of rape, murder and manslaughter.

We conclude, Muslims in Western countries degenerate easily to the archaic cultural patterns from before Islam. They are overtly restrictive to clothing and behavior of 'other sexual roles' e.g. women and homosexuals. While in stable Muslim home-countries as Morocco, where Sharia rules, Muslims are more modern and less rigid. So, on behalf of the loss of Sharia and other circumstances a lot of Western Muslim males regress to former Paradise cultures.

Of course we have not spoken about the group of Muslims which successfully integrated into Western society. But integration means to abide by the rules of the country. It has nothing to do with assimilation. Ahmed Aboutaleb, the major of Rotterdam is integrated, meaning he would be shocked if his daughters would not marry a Muslim. What the hell is he talking about. Why is he interested in their reproductive organs? Why does he want to extradite them to Muslim male terror? Is he projecting his afterlife into their descendants?

He will never assimilate into Western society. For Muslims to assimilate they first have to forswear their bloodthirsty conquest ideology, called Islam. They will never assimilate. It will not work. We are heading for civil war.



This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment