(327) Serial monotheism in superior religions

Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive

In the above diagrams from:

(245) Super religions are caused by inbreeding
(246) Superior and inferior religions
(247) Prophets are the real gods of the people 
(248) Extreme and moderate religions

there are two abandoned insights:

1: In the first place polytheism does not depend on the number of male ancestors (seen as gods) especially in inbreeding cultures. That's what we now will call serial monotheism:

Inbreeding is primarily a male collateral of reproduction, as males like to plough back daughters' female genes into the family gene pool (cousin marriages). Females instinctively adhere to polytheism (outcrossing):

- In the second place the time interval in the given diagram of 100,000 years is much too long. A religion spans about five thousand years at the most. New religions arise from sexual instincts as inbreeding and outbreeding, at first sight randomly. But of course, they must be interrelated in which polytheism follows monotheism and the other way around. Because religion is a power struggle in society. Monotheism is male terrorism on female sexual behavior. And polytheism is the recognition of 'other sexual roles' as equal gods as in the time of the ancient Greeks:

At the same time inbreeding triggers fertility stress for already 14 million years and reincarnation for the last two million years:

So, these are the corollaries of inbreeding:

Tribal ancestors from inbreeding cultures are multiple heterosexual males from the leading sexual role, the first god. Only the variety in different sexual roles (gods) determines polytheism. So, fundamentally, we see outbreeding, outcrossing and genetic diversity as polytheism:

As mentioned, our most interesting revelation from the latest articles is that there is no compelling relationship between successive cycles of the same type. In principle, inbreeding culture X has nothing to do with inbreeding culture X + 1. This is because both cultures (religions) are eruptions from the same inbreeding instinct with a time delay. Which also means that there is no guaranteed evolution over time in human religion:

So, if human religions arbitrarily arise from human sexual instincts, there is only a circular process to be expected in which polytheism and monotheism alternate. Well, then there is at least some circular interaction, but without any guarantee of increased religious depth:

Assumption 555: The plausibility of an inbreeding instinct

1: Twenty million years ago, the first bipedal primates lived in mammal groups with the Alpha male, which practiced inbreeding. But females in the periphery of the group chose for outbreeding or genetic diversity.


2: The first bipedal Hominids from 14 to 7 million years ago were forced to inbreeding by the bipedal mutation, which made it difficult for them to get in touch with other groups. Sexual culture is controlled and sanctioned by 'religion' and therefore 'inbreeding and incest' became the first bipedal primate religion.

3: Because this condition has lasted 14 million years, we assume that inbreeding has become a Sexual Instinct controlled and sanctioned by "religion". If that instinct is not diluted by mixing with outbred populations, it will be retained in the genes of the inbred population, AKA Arab and Asian Muslims.


4: A religion exists for a few thousand years at the most, say a maximum of 5 thousand years. This means that the inbreeding culture of Muslims cannot be the same religion as that of the early bipedal primates. There is no cultural connection possible. 
And that is the reason to suppose an inbreeding instinct, which is 
permanently present in the genes of inbred populations and from which swells up every few thousand years a new inbreeding culture. 





5: The implication of point 4 is that there is no guarantee of a meaningful religious evolution beyond the evolution of religious concepts as such, as reincarnation and resurrection, which is limited.

                                      

6: And that means Homo naledi could in principle have had more empathic religious depth than contemporary religions. So, according to this theory there is no reason to reject the burial rituals of Homo naledi, even if they did not believe in the soul or in reincarnation. They believed in the revival of their DNA, as a fetus with extended telomeres. Therefore, their graves needed an open connection to the outside world, without any gifts. With a soul graves were closed, with precious gifts.  (289) Homo naledi: Inbreeding caused no mole behavior                                 



7: So, inbreeding cultures come and go but have nothing in common. Their only connection is the eruption of the inbreeding instinct, dating from the first Hominids:

Further, there is some evolution with the invention of new religious concepts as reincarnation and resurrection. But this evolution is limited:

So the onset of new cycles must be random events, mostly starting from inbreeding, but within each event we always see the same well-known interactions between polytheism and monotheism, embellished with accompanying religions like Fertility

Stress and so on.

All this means that human religions are outbursts of Sexual Instincts (SI) in which cycles of monotheism and polytheism are time and culturally independent. So this really means that there must have been countless culture-independent inbreeding cultures over the past 100,000 years.


Superior and inferior religions:

In the articles:

(245) Super religions are caused by inbreeding
(246) Superior and inferior religions
(247) Prophets are the real gods of the people 
(248) Extreme and moderate religions

Super religions are simply based on male heterosexuality, the first god and inferior religions are 'other sexual roles', mostly about females. It shows the interaction between super and inferior religions, as if they are interdependent, which is true. These religions are each other's successors:

Remark for (10): Here we might run into difficulties because 'Earthly reincarnation' can be polytheism, but this is unlikely with serial monotheism from inbred populations. And 'Resurrection in the parallel universe' can be polytheism but not for Islam with 72 outbred virgins. So, outbreeding is not always the same as acknowledging 'other sexual roles'. Outbreeding also can come down to serial monotheism:

Below we see an example with outbreeding within a male kin bonded lineage (patrilinial descent) and probable serial monotheism. I guess there are no female sexual roles acknowledged as gods:

A nice example of an outbreeding culture, struggling with Fertility Stress:

With super and inferior religions we see symptoms of the sexual fight for hegemony between males and females, AKA 'religion'. But there is a step before super and inferior religions and that is Sexual Instincts (SI) from which all Human Religions (HR) are derived:

If nearly all known sorts of religions could be Sexual Instincts (SI), our model would be complete: