Sunday 23 August 2020

(330) Honor Killing Standard Theory

Basic Dimension




CHANGED BY ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE:
- October 2, 2020:  Added to: Art 330, 334, 335, 337: Assumptions 574, 581.
- Nederlands: Herzien verschil eerwraak - eermoord: Svp. zoek Assumption 581 on this homepage.



































Correcting honor in the family:














A bizarre and twisted love is the sick cause of honor killings:
















































































































Assumption 555: The plausibility of an inbreeding instinct


1: Twenty million years ago, the first bipedal primates lived in mammal groups with the Alpha male, which practiced inbreeding. But females in the periphery of the group chose for outbreeding or genetic diversity.


2: The first bipedal Hominids from 14 to 7 million years ago were forced to inbreeding by the bipedal mutation, which made it difficult for them to get in touch with other groups. Sexual culture is controlled and sanctioned by 'religion' and therefore 'inbreeding and incest' became the first bipedal primate religion.
3: Because this condition has lasted 14 million years, we assume that inbreeding has become a Sexual Instinct controlled and sanctioned by "religion". If that instinct is not diluted by mixing with outbred populations, it will be retained in the genes of the inbred population, AKA Arab and Asian Muslims.


4: A religion exists for a few thousand years at the most, say a maximum of 5 thousand years. This means that the inbreeding culture of Muslims cannot be the same religion as that of the early bipedal primates. There is no cultural connection possible. 
And that is the reason to suppose an inbreeding instinct, which is 
permanently present in the genes of inbred populations and from which swells up every few thousand years a new inbreeding culture. 





5: The implication of point 4 is that there is no guarantee of a meaningful religious evolution beyond the evolution of religious concepts as such, as reincarnation and resurrection, which is limited.
                                      
6: And that means Homo naledi could in principle have had more empathic religious depth than contemporary religions. So, according to this theory there is no reason to reject the burial rituals of Homo naledi, even if they did not believe in the soul or in reincarnation. They believed in the revival of their DNA, as a fetus with extended telomeres. Therefore, their graves needed an open connection to the outside world, without any gifts. With a soul graves were closed, with precious gifts.  (289) Homo naledi: Inbreeding caused no mole behavior                                 



7: So, inbreeding cultures come and go but have nothing in common. Their only connection is the eruption of the inbreeding instinct, dating from the first Hominids:




(289) Homo naledi: Inbreeding caused no mole behavior 

But in this latest interview Prof. Dr. Lee Berger said that possibly Homo naledi could be our ancient ancestor. Thinking about that means Homo erectus delivered the body to Homo sapiens with the enlarged skull, but Homo naledi brought in the hands, wrists, feet and legs. So the most modern features came from Homo naledi and the psychotic brain from Homo erectus:





The reason science is wrong about Homo naledi's religious beliefs lies in retrospective research. This blog revives all religious stages prospectively and comes to fundamentally different conclusions. All religious choices from the bipedal evolution were made anew, which sometimes resulted in unexpected interactions.
But retrospectively, one digs a Neanderthal tomb from 100,000 years ago and concludes this must have been the beginning of bipedal religion. That's a joke and no science either ...








No comments:

Post a Comment