.png)
Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
How this blog started
On this blog I invented nothing new. I only found a rational basis for my subjective and sub-conscious feelings about the origin of human religion. Because, just like millions of other people, I intuitively felt the link between religion and sexuality.
Foreword to this blog:
This blog is my personal notebook and not written for a broader public.
What we see in the picture above is no coincidence. Islam is simply a magical function of the former inbreeding culture: Islam = f(Inbreeding). Causality here is time dependent. To be clear: resurrection (Islam) is just a magical function of former reincarnation cult (based on Inbreeding). Both concepts are magical and probably non existent. Their connection with the basic dimension is fake.
From time order derivatives to multiple regression
The simple natural function HR = f(SR) turned out to become a very complex multiple regression HR = f(SR1,....SRX) after 7 million years in a foregoing time series of simple successive evolutionary steps (f, f, f, f, f). But principally, the first steps were natural simple regressions on the basic dimension: HR = f(SR):
So the first (f's) were natural and not magical (f). With to much inbreeding first bipedal primates (Australopithecines) simply geared into outbreeding for a while. But at some point in the evolution, religion drove magically and uncontrolled away from the basic dimension and bogged down into a time series expansion, resulting in a lot of nonsense derivatives:(f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f). Then, the pink f's had no real connection with the basic dimension any longer.
And so developed magical strings of f's, creating sets of predictors for the next multiple regression on the previous religion. Thus, later religions are based on multiple regressions on previous magical nonsense: HR = f(SR1,....SRX).
But the odd thing is that the natural basic dimension is still used to produce these absurd magical outcomes. For example, 'inbreeding' as a natural stimulus is needed to get the magical outcome of earthly reincarnation for ancestors as a response. We think this is the postulated ancient inbreeding instinct, which magical fallacy dates from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and is suppressed in today's unconscious mind of Muslim males.
Concluding: Muslims might use inbreeding for genetic immortality (parental genes passed to the offspring), what is based on a sincere and natural connection: HR = f(SR).
But that does not explain honor killings: HR = f(SR). Honor killings are explained by enforcing inbreeding (cousin marriages) to offer a genetically quite identical tribe for magical reincarnation of Muslim males. At the time this instinct came into existence, males were afraid of reincarnating into hostile tribes, and that means honor killings are based on a fallacy in thinking, on magical and erroneous thinking.
Below the wording of the magical Muslim faith as a horrible combination of heavenly resurrection with earthly reincarnation, which 'water and fire' combination caused millions of deaths. Honor killings are not collateral damage from Islam. On the contrary, Islam is completely responsible and inflicted them:
How is it possible that Muslims in the evolution did not get rid of inbreeding. The only possible explanation seems a hereditary inbreeding instinct:
It's natural that species adhere to outbreeding, like chimps and bonobos. Outbreeding religions as Christianity and Judaism are natural too. But it's not natural that Islam fossilized in the Australopithecus inbreeding cult. No other group of bipedal primates got stuck in inbreeding since the start of the bipedal mutation.
Well, maybe Homo naledi:
Content validity from HR = f(SR)
What we see 7 million years after the bipedal mutation is that human religion is still stuck to the basic dimension. Besides the fake link (f), the natural link (f) between HR and SR as well remains fundamental to (Human) religion.
The reason is that 'religion' basically is kind of group bonding, kind of group identity, which often associates with ethnicity and race. So, religion underlines group identity and therefore inbreeding religions adhere to stronger bonding than outbred cultures. This is because aliens are excluded from the group. On the other hand, the farther a religion (Christianity) shifts to outbreeding the sooner it loses communality and falls apart as bonding:
By definition Muslims cannot assimilate without rejecting Islam, so they might integrate which means they follow the law, but never they will assimilate as a group:
So, because the deeper nature of religion is keeping groups together we understand the natural relation between religion and the basic dimension as ever lasting. Then HR = f(SR) is appropriate for mammals living in groups together. So human religion never get rid of the basic dimension.
In summary, there are two lines of reasoning (f) and (f) coming together at the basic dimension:
- The first is religions creating fake connections between the basic dimension
and HR in HR = f(SR).
- The second is the natural bond between the basic dimension and HR in keeping groups together: HR = f(SR). And it is this natural binding which is most fundamental for our analysis. Because the basic dimension is concerned with the group character of religion, which is also its basic meaning in the evolution. Both are forever connected to each other in HR = f(SR).
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
No fundamental difference between human and animal religion
Chimps and bonobos are also primates living in groups together, though quadrupeds. It will turn out there is no - not any - fundamental difference in religion between Homo and Pan, quite shocking and humiliating for us.
Mating within groups (arranged marriages) comes down to bargaining between inbreeding and outbreeding for not to go extinct. And that is exactly what we see in today's Islam.
But for single pairs, like gannets, full outbreeding is the norm for survival of the species. But for Christians, full outbreeding kills survival of the group. Because full outbreeding dilutes common moral grounds and leads to individuals without bonding.
This all means HR = f(SR) has a logical foundation, what is not revolutionary. It's remarkable though that the cause of honor killings rolls out. And the reason is that HR = f(SR) contains magical derailments between earthly reincarnation by inbreeding and heavenly resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe with Allah.
Additional degrees of freedom
To solve for honor killings we have placed an extra degree of freedom (SR) in the past and far before the onset of human religion (HR). But we needed another degree of freedom in the unconscious of Muslim males. And so, with two additional degrees of freedom we were able to address honor killings and possibly expand our understanding of the Muslim faith exponentially in the future.
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
How this blog started
On this blog I invented nothing new. I only found a rational basis for my subjective and sub-conscious feelings about the origin of human religion. Because, just like millions of other people, I intuitively felt the link between religion and sexuality.
At about the age of ten I already grasped that Eve and the Serpent likely had a forbidden sexual relationship and that the apple was their child, with whom she misled Adam. My whole further life I was not interested in religion. But then, suddenly I felt the need to read the first three chapters of Genesis and was shocked by the strong and powerful formulations. I really was delighted and thought to understand exactly the double meaning of what was written. I also saw there had to be a rational model underlying. But how to transform my thoughts into a rational model, that was the problem...
So, I searched for an underlying rational model of Human Religion (HR). And for a number of years I tried to connect the dots. But I failed and got stuck in multiple regressions and the like.
And just when I thought no formula existed, I found the most simple and most obvious solution in the world: HR = f(SR). Why didn't I see that immediately? It's so obvious! Well, I was functional fixed:
Religion is a kind of breeding
The reason it took so long to realize Human Religion (HR) as a function of Sexual Religion (SR) is that I was convinced only Sexual Religion existed. My whole life I really thought 'religion' was a sublimated form of sexuality. Well, that is still possible with HR = f(SR). But to come to there, you first have to establish two mental entities: HR and SR.
So, I never saw religion as an independent entity, coming from God. It always seemed to me a disguised form of sexuality. What it is. Therefore, I was blocked to give 'religion' two degrees of freedom, needed to understand honor killings.
After years I inspected my Sexual Model of Religion (left side) and wondered: What the heck, why isn't religion placed in this model? Where is Islam in this model? And Christianity? (Judaism lies in between on the SM-dimension). And because SR was first in the evolution, it was clear HR had to be a function of SR: 'Religion must be a kind of breeding':
So, I searched for an underlying rational model of Human Religion (HR). And for a number of years I tried to connect the dots. But I failed and got stuck in multiple regressions and the like.
And just when I thought no formula existed, I found the most simple and most obvious solution in the world: HR = f(SR). Why didn't I see that immediately? It's so obvious! Well, I was functional fixed:
Religion is a kind of breeding
The reason it took so long to realize Human Religion (HR) as a function of Sexual Religion (SR) is that I was convinced only Sexual Religion existed. My whole life I really thought 'religion' was a sublimated form of sexuality. Well, that is still possible with HR = f(SR). But to come to there, you first have to establish two mental entities: HR and SR.
So, I never saw religion as an independent entity, coming from God. It always seemed to me a disguised form of sexuality. What it is. Therefore, I was blocked to give 'religion' two degrees of freedom, needed to understand honor killings.
After years I inspected my Sexual Model of Religion (left side) and wondered: What the heck, why isn't religion placed in this model? Where is Islam in this model? And Christianity? (Judaism lies in between on the SM-dimension). And because SR was first in the evolution, it was clear HR had to be a function of SR: 'Religion must be a kind of breeding':
Foreword to this blog:
This blog is my personal notebook and not written for a broader public.
That's why a lot of things won't be clear at first sight, but don't bother, it is written redundantly. Actually, I needed about 300 articles to compress my subliminal thoughts about religion into a parsimoniously written model: HR = f(SR) or HR = f(SR).
Because of this introduction and the fundamental importance of HR = f(SR) and HR = f(SR),
I will explain this stuff didactically as best I can:
There we go:
In HR = f(SR) is Human Religion (HR) a magical function of Sexual Religion (SR), which is the basic dimension of sexual procreation with inbreeding and outbreeding at the extremes. A magical function is mystical without natural basis. E.g. earthly reincarnation is a magical function of inbreeding. In other words, there is no connection.
On the other hand we have real natural functions from SR: HR = f(SR).
E.g. autosomal recessive disorders are natural functions of inbreeding. It is a real connection.
But there is a major natural function HR = f(SR), lying at the core of religion:
In religion, the most prominent example of a natural connection is to see inbreeding religions as having stronger bonding than outbred populations. Because aliens are excluded from the group. Outbreeding cultures do not keep the group together and eventually fall apart as bonding.
This means, Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
Assumption 465: Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
So, if the deeper nature of religion is keeping the group together with its remarkable group identity, we understand the natural relationship between religion and the basic dimension as ever lasting. Then HR = f(SR) is appropriate for mammals living in groups together. This means, human religion will never get rid of the basic dimension. The basic dimension is the main provider of religious ammunition:
Mammals living in groups together, bargaining inbreeding/outbreeding
Primates live in groups together. Therefore we involve the Alpha male (inbreeding), which rules about his females (outbreeding):
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
Magical functions
In HR = f(SR) the magical function (f) gives the transformation from animal sexuality (SR) to human religion (HR). Notice, 'sexuality' is not meant frivolously but as plain re-foundation of the origin of human religion.
Never in the history of mankind has developed such a simple magical function, which will not be falsified and already split the Muslim religion into two parts, which together explain the cause of honor killings:
Because of this introduction and the fundamental importance of HR = f(SR) and HR = f(SR),
I will explain this stuff didactically as best I can:
There we go:
In HR = f(SR) is Human Religion (HR) a magical function of Sexual Religion (SR), which is the basic dimension of sexual procreation with inbreeding and outbreeding at the extremes. A magical function is mystical without natural basis. E.g. earthly reincarnation is a magical function of inbreeding. In other words, there is no connection.
On the other hand we have real natural functions from SR: HR = f(SR).
E.g. autosomal recessive disorders are natural functions of inbreeding. It is a real connection.
But there is a major natural function HR = f(SR), lying at the core of religion:
In religion, the most prominent example of a natural connection is to see inbreeding religions as having stronger bonding than outbred populations. Because aliens are excluded from the group. Outbreeding cultures do not keep the group together and eventually fall apart as bonding.
This means, Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
Assumption 465: Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
So, if the deeper nature of religion is keeping the group together with its remarkable group identity, we understand the natural relationship between religion and the basic dimension as ever lasting. Then HR = f(SR) is appropriate for mammals living in groups together. This means, human religion will never get rid of the basic dimension. The basic dimension is the main provider of religious ammunition:
Mammals living in groups together, bargaining inbreeding/outbreeding
Primates live in groups together. Therefore we involve the Alpha male (inbreeding), which rules about his females (outbreeding):
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
Magical functions
In HR = f(SR) the magical function (f) gives the transformation from animal sexuality (SR) to human religion (HR). Notice, 'sexuality' is not meant frivolously but as plain re-foundation of the origin of human religion.
Never in the history of mankind has developed such a simple magical function, which will not be falsified and already split the Muslim religion into two parts, which together explain the cause of honor killings:
What we see in the picture above is no coincidence. Islam is simply a magical function of the former inbreeding culture: Islam = f(Inbreeding). Causality here is time dependent. To be clear: resurrection (Islam) is just a magical function of former reincarnation cult (based on Inbreeding). Both concepts are magical and probably non existent. Their connection with the basic dimension is fake.
From time order derivatives to multiple regression
The simple natural function HR = f(SR) turned out to become a very complex multiple regression HR = f(SR1,....SRX) after 7 million years in a foregoing time series of simple successive evolutionary steps (f, f, f, f, f). But principally, the first steps were natural simple regressions on the basic dimension: HR = f(SR):
And so developed magical strings of f's, creating sets of predictors for the next multiple regression on the previous religion. Thus, later religions are based on multiple regressions on previous magical nonsense: HR = f(SR1,....SRX).
But the odd thing is that the natural basic dimension is still used to produce these absurd magical outcomes. For example, 'inbreeding' as a natural stimulus is needed to get the magical outcome of earthly reincarnation for ancestors as a response. We think this is the postulated ancient inbreeding instinct, which magical fallacy dates from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and is suppressed in today's unconscious mind of Muslim males.
Concluding: Muslims might use inbreeding for genetic immortality (parental genes passed to the offspring), what is based on a sincere and natural connection: HR = f(SR).
But that does not explain honor killings: HR = f(SR). Honor killings are explained by enforcing inbreeding (cousin marriages) to offer a genetically quite identical tribe for magical reincarnation of Muslim males. At the time this instinct came into existence, males were afraid of reincarnating into hostile tribes, and that means honor killings are based on a fallacy in thinking, on magical and erroneous thinking.
Below the wording of the magical Muslim faith as a horrible combination of heavenly resurrection with earthly reincarnation, which 'water and fire' combination caused millions of deaths. Honor killings are not collateral damage from Islam. On the contrary, Islam is completely responsible and inflicted them:
How is it possible that Muslims in the evolution did not get rid of inbreeding. The only possible explanation seems a hereditary inbreeding instinct:
It's natural that species adhere to outbreeding, like chimps and bonobos. Outbreeding religions as Christianity and Judaism are natural too. But it's not natural that Islam fossilized in the Australopithecus inbreeding cult. No other group of bipedal primates got stuck in inbreeding since the start of the bipedal mutation.
Well, maybe Homo naledi:
Content validity from HR = f(SR)
What we see 7 million years after the bipedal mutation is that human religion is still stuck to the basic dimension. Besides the fake link (f), the natural link (f) between HR and SR as well remains fundamental to (Human) religion.
The reason is that 'religion' basically is kind of group bonding, kind of group identity, which often associates with ethnicity and race. So, religion underlines group identity and therefore inbreeding religions adhere to stronger bonding than outbred cultures. This is because aliens are excluded from the group. On the other hand, the farther a religion (Christianity) shifts to outbreeding the sooner it loses communality and falls apart as bonding:
By definition Muslims cannot assimilate without rejecting Islam, so they might integrate which means they follow the law, but never they will assimilate as a group:
In summary, there are two lines of reasoning (f) and (f) coming together at the basic dimension:
- The first is religions creating fake connections between the basic dimension
and HR in HR = f(SR).
- The second is the natural bond between the basic dimension and HR in keeping groups together: HR = f(SR). And it is this natural binding which is most fundamental for our analysis. Because the basic dimension is concerned with the group character of religion, which is also its basic meaning in the evolution. Both are forever connected to each other in HR = f(SR).
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
No fundamental difference between human and animal religion
Chimps and bonobos are also primates living in groups together, though quadrupeds. It will turn out there is no - not any - fundamental difference in religion between Homo and Pan, quite shocking and humiliating for us.
Mating within groups (arranged marriages) comes down to bargaining between inbreeding and outbreeding for not to go extinct. And that is exactly what we see in today's Islam.
But for single pairs, like gannets, full outbreeding is the norm for survival of the species. But for Christians, full outbreeding kills survival of the group. Because full outbreeding dilutes common moral grounds and leads to individuals without bonding.
This all means HR = f(SR) has a logical foundation, what is not revolutionary. It's remarkable though that the cause of honor killings rolls out. And the reason is that HR = f(SR) contains magical derailments between earthly reincarnation by inbreeding and heavenly resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe with Allah.
Additional degrees of freedom
To solve for honor killings we have placed an extra degree of freedom (SR) in the past and far before the onset of human religion (HR). But we needed another degree of freedom in the unconscious of Muslim males. And so, with two additional degrees of freedom we were able to address honor killings and possibly expand our understanding of the Muslim faith exponentially in the future.
Notice, both additional degrees are based on facts. We always forget about the effects of the unconscious on our behavior and Islam covers the area of inbreeding perfectly.
Is animal sexuality (SR) the baseline of our civilization?
If animal sexuality (SR) is the baseline, increasingly complex magical functions must be invented to fit in with today's advanced forms of human religion (HR).
With this null measurement (SR), we can order human religions on whatever scale we want: maybe civilization? Well, that's way to simple. Because, would animal sexuality be uncivilized religion? With pairwise living monogamous gannets that stay together for about 50 years, almost permanently in danger on the seas? And female deer that choose their male? Compare this with Islam:
Maybe there's not much difference between animal religion and human religion. And speaking of civilization, what about the Muslim civilization? Well, don't forget Christians either...
Is human religion (HR) per definition more civilized, with higher moral standards than animal sexuality (SR)? No, below we show our doubts concerning our highest human value:
All sexual roles are equally respected
Bonobo civilization might turn out to be the most civilized 'human' religion on Earth. Am I throwing up civilization, civility, sexuality and religion? Well, why not? What core value would make the difference? This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue:
(59) The Killer Hominid
Panini
Seven million years of evolution created somewhat different species for Panini:
Chimpanzees are called Panini and human like creatures are called Hominini. Chimpanzees and Hominini diverged as Homininae from the common ancestor Hominidae, about 14 - 7 million years ago (mya). About 6-5 mya, Panini and Hominini split apart. Fewer than one million years ago the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) species effectively separated as DNA evidence suggests.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11128.html
Two African apes are the closest living relatives of humans: the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus). Although they are similar in many respects, bonobos and chimpanzees differ strikingly in key social and sexual behaviours1, 2, 3, 4, and for some of these traits they show more similarity with humans than with each other.
Here we report the sequencing and assembly of the bonobo genome to study its evolutionary relationship with the chimpanzee and human genomes. We find that more than three per cent of the human genome is more closely related to either the bonobo or the chimpanzee genome than these are to each other. These regions allow various aspects of the ancestry of the two ape species to be reconstructed. In addition, many of the regions that overlap genes may eventually help us understand the genetic basis of phenotypes that humans share with one of the two apes to the exclusion of the other.
This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue.
It concludes polytheism (outbreeding) as being much more civilized than monotheism (inbreeding) and more humane than Desert Religions. But remember, Christianity and moderate Judaism converged to (semi-) polytheism (outbreeding) in the evolution. Only Islam remained monotheistic (inbreeding) without any respect for female gods (other sexual roles):
It turns out respecting 'other sexual roles' (outbreeding) is the high point of human civilization. And now you see where culture, civilization, sexuality and religion find their intersection: showing respect for other sexual roles, especially women.
But beware, respecting 'other sexual roles' is also the end stage of Christianity, what comes down to the Democrats in the US. It's the end stage of the group with common values. It's Marxist relativism und der Untergang des Abendlandes.
So, Sodom and Gomorrah from the bonobos will be the endplay of Western Civilization. This is not a value judgment but a gloomy prediction. That's also where this blog is all about:
What error did we make in comparing sexual religion (SR) with human religion (HR)? The basic dimension (SR) is amoral. It is just the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding. So, in principle the entire moral structure of human Religion (HR), reflected in its magical function (f) is though based on the basic dimension, but this only for the amoral and pure physical aspects of inbreeding vs. outbreeding. So, Human Religion (HR) has everything to do with the basic dimension (SR), but the latter nothing with the former.
This means Human Religion (HR) is only associated with the basic dimension by magical human thinking over millions of years. Well, this only for the magical part of religion.
And meanwhile we found another degree of freedom. Bonobos and chimps have Animal Religion (AR) which is not principally different from human religion. So, we have Human Religion (HR), Animal Religion (AR) and Sexual Religion (SR). And because there are no rules defined by God, there is no difference between Homo and Pan:
Bonobos have developed magical functions of the basic dimension as well and there is a striking similarity between Homo and Pan. Because, bonobos came out on exactly the same point as Christianity. Our nephews converged in the same point of civilization as us, then, how civilized are we? So, there cannot be so much difference between Homo and Pan. It's chilling but we might be animals too:
Outbreeding is the basic law to propagate the species, meaning all animals project on the outbreeding pole of the basic dimension for not to go extinct. And so quadrupedal primates (chimps) adhere the male kin bonded lineage and exchange juvenile females with other tribes, three trees farther. Well, it's somewhat different because juvenile females possess the outbreeding instinct and leave the tribe sneaky. But besides that, chimps have an enormous varied genome and won't easily die out from inbreeding. Just like the first bipedal primates (Australopiths).
We see bonobos adhere outbreeding too, because their female kin bonded lineage doesn't keep males as prisoners (just like chimps don't terrorize females). Bonobo males are just fond of their submissive roles, just like masochistic Christian males.
These feminine males are stuck to Vanilla-dyad too. And even more than Christians, bonobos respect 'other sexual roles'. So, how special are we? We are stupidly arrogant Homo sapiens, because Homo naledi with half our brain was much wiser and rejected stupid magical thinking as the soul.
And now we are coming somewhere. Seven million years ago bipedal primates lost sight on other tribes and were designated on inbreeding, which became an identity marker, on which inbreeding developed magically into religion. That's the reason why bipedal primates religion is born out of the inbreeding pole of the basic dimension. To repeat, religion projects on the basic dimension, but the latter has nothing to do with 'religion'.
Proceeding:
We conclude, the occult and esoteric upgrading of nowadays human religion is totally in the chosen function (f). Actually, with (f) we place additional degrees of freedom between the human world and the animal world. Then, in retrospect we must be able to return from Catholicism (HR) to animal sexuality (SR) by choosing the proper (f). No matter how mystical a religion, we will find the proper inverse f-transformation back to the animal world.
Comparing Desert Religions on HR = f (SR), and compairing interval with ratio scale meanwhile
The above figure is a projection on interval level, only for conceptual understanding. Since, actually the rate of inbreeding is derived from the number of autosomal recessive disorders in a population. For outbreeding this number drops and for inbreeding it increases. Ratio scale has a real zero point. But of course, there are more sophisticated methods to determine the rate of inbreeding in a population.
Depending on other determining variables, inbreeding and outbreeding need not lie in line on the same dimension. Sometimes opposite parts of the same conceptual dimension fall out of line and can be negatively correlated as two vectors from the origin with an obtuse angle. Then, we need a rank = 2 setup.
Inbreeding is good and outbreeding is evil
But inbreeding and outbreeding can also be positively correlated, because total inbreeding for Homo sapiens definitely leads to extinction within a given number of generations. So, where is inbreeding, there must be also outbreeding. The holy grail in Sexual Religion lies around 40% inbreeding against 60% outbreeding:
Even without data we can make clear, difficult to describe situations, for example:
Christianity and Islam as having an obtuse angle within the Archetype subspace. Well, I see, the plot had to be rotated somewhat more 😓:
Main breakthroughs and struggles:
There have been some difficult turning points which have delayed the analysis.
Is animal sexuality (SR) the baseline of our civilization?
If animal sexuality (SR) is the baseline, increasingly complex magical functions must be invented to fit in with today's advanced forms of human religion (HR).
With this null measurement (SR), we can order human religions on whatever scale we want: maybe civilization? Well, that's way to simple. Because, would animal sexuality be uncivilized religion? With pairwise living monogamous gannets that stay together for about 50 years, almost permanently in danger on the seas? And female deer that choose their male? Compare this with Islam:
Maybe there's not much difference between animal religion and human religion. And speaking of civilization, what about the Muslim civilization? Well, don't forget Christians either...
Is human religion (HR) per definition more civilized, with higher moral standards than animal sexuality (SR)? No, below we show our doubts concerning our highest human value:
All sexual roles are equally respected
Bonobo civilization might turn out to be the most civilized 'human' religion on Earth. Am I throwing up civilization, civility, sexuality and religion? Well, why not? What core value would make the difference? This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue:
(59) The Killer Hominid
Panini
Seven million years of evolution created somewhat different species for Panini:
Chimpanzees are called Panini and human like creatures are called Hominini. Chimpanzees and Hominini diverged as Homininae from the common ancestor Hominidae, about 14 - 7 million years ago (mya). About 6-5 mya, Panini and Hominini split apart. Fewer than one million years ago the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) species effectively separated as DNA evidence suggests.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11128.html
Two African apes are the closest living relatives of humans: the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus). Although they are similar in many respects, bonobos and chimpanzees differ strikingly in key social and sexual behaviours1, 2, 3, 4, and for some of these traits they show more similarity with humans than with each other.
Here we report the sequencing and assembly of the bonobo genome to study its evolutionary relationship with the chimpanzee and human genomes. We find that more than three per cent of the human genome is more closely related to either the bonobo or the chimpanzee genome than these are to each other. These regions allow various aspects of the ancestry of the two ape species to be reconstructed. In addition, many of the regions that overlap genes may eventually help us understand the genetic basis of phenotypes that humans share with one of the two apes to the exclusion of the other.
This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue.
It concludes polytheism (outbreeding) as being much more civilized than monotheism (inbreeding) and more humane than Desert Religions. But remember, Christianity and moderate Judaism converged to (semi-) polytheism (outbreeding) in the evolution. Only Islam remained monotheistic (inbreeding) without any respect for female gods (other sexual roles):
It turns out respecting 'other sexual roles' (outbreeding) is the high point of human civilization. And now you see where culture, civilization, sexuality and religion find their intersection: showing respect for other sexual roles, especially women.
But beware, respecting 'other sexual roles' is also the end stage of Christianity, what comes down to the Democrats in the US. It's the end stage of the group with common values. It's Marxist relativism und der Untergang des Abendlandes.
So, Sodom and Gomorrah from the bonobos will be the endplay of Western Civilization. This is not a value judgment but a gloomy prediction. That's also where this blog is all about:
What error did we make in comparing sexual religion (SR) with human religion (HR)? The basic dimension (SR) is amoral. It is just the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding. So, in principle the entire moral structure of human Religion (HR), reflected in its magical function (f) is though based on the basic dimension, but this only for the amoral and pure physical aspects of inbreeding vs. outbreeding. So, Human Religion (HR) has everything to do with the basic dimension (SR), but the latter nothing with the former.
This means Human Religion (HR) is only associated with the basic dimension by magical human thinking over millions of years. Well, this only for the magical part of religion.
And meanwhile we found another degree of freedom. Bonobos and chimps have Animal Religion (AR) which is not principally different from human religion. So, we have Human Religion (HR), Animal Religion (AR) and Sexual Religion (SR). And because there are no rules defined by God, there is no difference between Homo and Pan:
Bonobos have developed magical functions of the basic dimension as well and there is a striking similarity between Homo and Pan. Because, bonobos came out on exactly the same point as Christianity. Our nephews converged in the same point of civilization as us, then, how civilized are we? So, there cannot be so much difference between Homo and Pan. It's chilling but we might be animals too:
We see bonobos adhere outbreeding too, because their female kin bonded lineage doesn't keep males as prisoners (just like chimps don't terrorize females). Bonobo males are just fond of their submissive roles, just like masochistic Christian males.
These feminine males are stuck to Vanilla-dyad too. And even more than Christians, bonobos respect 'other sexual roles'. So, how special are we? We are stupidly arrogant Homo sapiens, because Homo naledi with half our brain was much wiser and rejected stupid magical thinking as the soul.
And now we are coming somewhere. Seven million years ago bipedal primates lost sight on other tribes and were designated on inbreeding, which became an identity marker, on which inbreeding developed magically into religion. That's the reason why bipedal primates religion is born out of the inbreeding pole of the basic dimension. To repeat, religion projects on the basic dimension, but the latter has nothing to do with 'religion'.
We conclude, the occult and esoteric upgrading of nowadays human religion is totally in the chosen function (f). Actually, with (f) we place additional degrees of freedom between the human world and the animal world. Then, in retrospect we must be able to return from Catholicism (HR) to animal sexuality (SR) by choosing the proper (f). No matter how mystical a religion, we will find the proper inverse f-transformation back to the animal world.
Comparing Desert Religions on HR = f (SR), and compairing interval with ratio scale meanwhile
The above figure is a projection on interval level, only for conceptual understanding. Since, actually the rate of inbreeding is derived from the number of autosomal recessive disorders in a population. For outbreeding this number drops and for inbreeding it increases. Ratio scale has a real zero point. But of course, there are more sophisticated methods to determine the rate of inbreeding in a population.
Depending on other determining variables, inbreeding and outbreeding need not lie in line on the same dimension. Sometimes opposite parts of the same conceptual dimension fall out of line and can be negatively correlated as two vectors from the origin with an obtuse angle. Then, we need a rank = 2 setup.
Inbreeding is good and outbreeding is evil
But inbreeding and outbreeding can also be positively correlated, because total inbreeding for Homo sapiens definitely leads to extinction within a given number of generations. So, where is inbreeding, there must be also outbreeding. The holy grail in Sexual Religion lies around 40% inbreeding against 60% outbreeding:
Even without data we can make clear, difficult to describe situations, for example:
Christianity and Islam as having an obtuse angle within the Archetype subspace. Well, I see, the plot had to be rotated somewhat more 😓:
Main breakthroughs and struggles:
There have been some difficult turning points which have delayed the analysis.
The remedy was always to implement extra degrees of freedom in the theory for better understanding:
- For example, honor killings are understandable only by adding an extra degree of freedom to the unconscious of Muslim males.
- Sexual Religion (SR) is an extra degree of freedom between animals (quadrupedal primates, chimps) and Hominins (bipedal primates, humans) to understand Human Religion (HR).
- It follows (from SR = inbreeding) the Muslim faith can be split into two religions for better understanding. It is a hybrid from inbreeding (SR) and Islam (HR).
Now, here we see the heuristic value of the introduction of Sexual Religion, since the Muslim faith appears to be a hybrid from two religions, in which earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection are as water and fire. This means HR = f(SR) explains the state of the art of the Muslim faith. The Muslim faith is not balanced but full of contradictions.
Now, here we see the heuristic value of the introduction of Sexual Religion, since the Muslim faith appears to be a hybrid from two religions, in which earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection are as water and fire. This means HR = f(SR) explains the state of the art of the Muslim faith. The Muslim faith is not balanced but full of contradictions.
1) A crucial moment was when I realized that the relationship between sexuality and religion is about 'nature (quality) and number (quantity)', where I first neglected 'nature'. I thought for the first hominids the number of children in the relationship between husband and wife was most important (fertility stress). But then I learned 'nature' (yellow) concerns the (religious) quality of the offspring, which led to the forced choice between inbreeding and outbreeding:
Original Myth of Paradise (HR) is a function (f) of the Basic Dimension (SR)
Inbreeding underlined group identity (religion) from bipedal primates. And that is precisely the principal difference between Adam and the Serpent from that other tribe. So, in this original paradise narrative we already see human religion (HR) as derived from sexual religion (SR), in HR = f(SR). This, because the religious measure (HR) was taken (f) from the basic dimension of sexual religion (SR). Because the function was taken from inbreeding versus outbreeding.
So, the original Myth of Paradise from the first bipedal primates (Australopithecines) was already based on the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding and concerned countering female adultery with aliens.
Original Myth of Paradise (HR) is a function (f) of the Basic Dimension (SR)
Inbreeding underlined group identity (religion) from bipedal primates. And that is precisely the principal difference between Adam and the Serpent from that other tribe. So, in this original paradise narrative we already see human religion (HR) as derived from sexual religion (SR), in HR = f(SR). This, because the religious measure (HR) was taken (f) from the basic dimension of sexual religion (SR). Because the function was taken from inbreeding versus outbreeding.
So, the original Myth of Paradise from the first bipedal primates (Australopithecines) was already based on the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding and concerned countering female adultery with aliens.
2) In addition to the former (adding inbreeding vs. outbreeding as a quality aspect), my second major insight was that Alpha males (God) practiced inbreeding in the core of the group, while females in the mantle (Eve) adhered outbreeding and were adulterous to males from outside (the Serpent). And that's why the outrageous monotheistic God (inbreeding) thundered:
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-3/
15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Also here we see the outrage of God (HR) as a clear function (f) of sexual religion (SR, against outbreeding). And again, the function itself is characterized by threatening females, subject to inbreeding, where their natural instinct is outbreeding. So, with inbreeding cultures the nature of the conversion (f) from SR to HR is always female oppression. That's also exactly the difference between Islam (inbreeding) and Christianity (outbreeding).
Christianity and Judaism are also functions of the basic dimension, but they project on the outbreeding part. Jews practice the female kin bonded lineage, with female mtDNA, while women can marry whatever male they like (outbreeding):
3) Thus, the basic dimension is formed by an animal sexual component (outbreeding, hominids) and a human sexual component (inbreeding, hominins):
4) About 4000 years ago or much earlier, scholars must have changed the original paradise narrative to get rid of extreme inbreeding, which threatened the survival of Homo sapiens as a species, with his feeble genetic variation.
At some point in time from 10,000 - 4,000 years ago, scholars must have created a new paradise story, which is absurd and illogical, but now widely known and admired by billions of people. Still later, Romans reinterpreted Christianity and abolished inbreeding totally. Since then, Christians believe in a completely new paradise narrative about the fall of Man, without any reference to inbreeding:
The fall of man, or the fall, is a term used in Christianity to describe the transition of the first man and woman from a state of innocent obedience to God to a state of guilty disobedience. (WIKI)
But Islam tragically failed to ban the inbreeding instinct from Muslims and stranded in a dual religion:
5) From the first bipedal mutation - seven million years ago - primates thought rationally and were not stupid. They conceived the paradise narrative as a logical initiation rite for boys and were not as silly as we think. And speech was not required to explain males how to stop adultery from females.
They did not believe in 'the soul' and more of that uncorroborated stuff:
It is us who are the sick magical thinkers, not the rational Homo erectus or even Australopiths as Homo naledi. These vulnerable people would not have survived a single night in the African wilderness without a strong and rational brain.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
7) I struggled for a lot in finding the most parsimonious formula of human religion. And just when I tended to give up I realized how Human Religion was rooted in Sexual Religion: HR = f(SR). This simple and parsimonious formula has great heuristic value to understand human religion by generating new theories.
At the end of the day I hope to have found the most elegant model for human religion. A model that explains what religion can't explain from itself. Usually, religions command sacred rules for regular worship, complete with do's and don'ts. These rules normally concern sexual behavior of women. This blog pretends to explain where and why human religions are reluctant to understand themselves. Because it is embarrassing and revealing.
The Sexual Theory of Religion tries to explain the origins of human religion without reading any religious text other than the first three chapters of Genesis. Human religion started out of bipedal primate religion from about 7 million years ago, so why bother about the last 4000 years?
When the reader gets familiar with the abundant amount of visual representations as pictures, diagrams, figures and schemes, it helps to grasp new articles without reading. I myself use these visual representations as kind of shorthand for a quick scan of the content of older articles. And if projections and formulas are not clear at once, just proceed and the text will make the subject clear, extensively and ad nauseam.
Especially, article 230 is written for very young Muslim girls. But please, read it with others...
(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-3/
15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Also here we see the outrage of God (HR) as a clear function (f) of sexual religion (SR, against outbreeding). And again, the function itself is characterized by threatening females, subject to inbreeding, where their natural instinct is outbreeding. So, with inbreeding cultures the nature of the conversion (f) from SR to HR is always female oppression. That's also exactly the difference between Islam (inbreeding) and Christianity (outbreeding).
Christianity and Judaism are also functions of the basic dimension, but they project on the outbreeding part. Jews practice the female kin bonded lineage, with female mtDNA, while women can marry whatever male they like (outbreeding):
3) Thus, the basic dimension is formed by an animal sexual component (outbreeding, hominids) and a human sexual component (inbreeding, hominins):
4) About 4000 years ago or much earlier, scholars must have changed the original paradise narrative to get rid of extreme inbreeding, which threatened the survival of Homo sapiens as a species, with his feeble genetic variation.
At some point in time from 10,000 - 4,000 years ago, scholars must have created a new paradise story, which is absurd and illogical, but now widely known and admired by billions of people. Still later, Romans reinterpreted Christianity and abolished inbreeding totally. Since then, Christians believe in a completely new paradise narrative about the fall of Man, without any reference to inbreeding:
The fall of man, or the fall, is a term used in Christianity to describe the transition of the first man and woman from a state of innocent obedience to God to a state of guilty disobedience. (WIKI)
But Islam tragically failed to ban the inbreeding instinct from Muslims and stranded in a dual religion:
They did not believe in 'the soul' and more of that uncorroborated stuff:
It is us who are the sick magical thinkers, not the rational Homo erectus or even Australopiths as Homo naledi. These vulnerable people would not have survived a single night in the African wilderness without a strong and rational brain.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
7) I struggled for a lot in finding the most parsimonious formula of human religion. And just when I tended to give up I realized how Human Religion was rooted in Sexual Religion: HR = f(SR). This simple and parsimonious formula has great heuristic value to understand human religion by generating new theories.
At the end of the day I hope to have found the most elegant model for human religion. A model that explains what religion can't explain from itself. Usually, religions command sacred rules for regular worship, complete with do's and don'ts. These rules normally concern sexual behavior of women. This blog pretends to explain where and why human religions are reluctant to understand themselves. Because it is embarrassing and revealing.
The Sexual Theory of Religion tries to explain the origins of human religion without reading any religious text other than the first three chapters of Genesis. Human religion started out of bipedal primate religion from about 7 million years ago, so why bother about the last 4000 years?
When the reader gets familiar with the abundant amount of visual representations as pictures, diagrams, figures and schemes, it helps to grasp new articles without reading. I myself use these visual representations as kind of shorthand for a quick scan of the content of older articles. And if projections and formulas are not clear at once, just proceed and the text will make the subject clear, extensively and ad nauseam.
Especially, article 230 is written for very young Muslim girls. But please, read it with others...
(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴
No comments:
Post a Comment