.png)
Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
Honor killings, how it's made:
Eight years I searched for the cause of honor killings, from which I offered one year to my country for the MH17. I tried all strategies, dived deep into my unconscious for the sense of atmosphere around honor killings. That's how unconscious alignment works. It has been a rollercoaster of emotions, a horrible psychotic experience which was triggered by my immense anger about the killing of Sadia Sheikh. It struck me so deeply that I was determined once and for all, to resolve honor killings and religion altogether. I built my own religious model out of the animal world.
I was shocked about how previously loving fathers could change into most brutal, horrible and gruesome animals. It was unbelievable. And after the kill they showed some cold and apathetic behavior. It is like psychosis, not able to differentiate between delusion and reality anymore. The satisfaction from the kill in the inner world of delusion, against the cold shower from the horror and anger of the outside world. To what extent were those fathers really aware of their situation? That's the core problem. And to solve this problem one must show empathy with these brutal murderers, but of course, no sympathy.
The crazy thing is I already owned the solution of this drama right from the beginning, but had no model. The model demands two degrees of freedom: Human religion (HR) and Sexual Religion (SR). But I was functional fixed and always thought Human Religion equals sublimated Animal Sexuality (SR), on the same degree of freedom. So, I came not at the idea of HR = f(SR), though sublimation delivered exactly (f), the second degree of freedom.
I wrote all possible scenarios and in the end I came out on the rational explanation of an impossible contrast between earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection:
I really think this is the best thinkable rational ground for honor killings. If there was another, let alone better solution, I would definitely have known. But there isn't.
So, now we have the formula, the model HR = f(SR), in which honor killings take place. But we still have to find the rationale of honor killings in this plot. So, what was the Muslim father thinking and how was his daughter reacting. The model only gives the precondition for the psychological diagnosis we have to make.
But we also know resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1), measured over time: HR2 = f(HR1). And again, we have two degrees of freedom to find the solution for honor killings. And this alternative function - theoretically based on a time series expansion - tells us Islam forbade earthly reincarnation, what is the crux to understanding honor killings. So, the conditions lie in the formula, which we have to interpret.
Resuming, for the explanation of honor killings we need Islam as Human Religion (HR), dependent on Inbreeding as Sexual Religion (SR), but we also need resurrection from (HR2) caused by reincarnation from (HR1). So, resurrection (outbreeding) and reincarnation (inbreeding) are based on the basic dimension in HR = f(SR), but are also connected in time, wherein reincarnation precedes resurrection in HR2 = f(HR1). Together this creates a strong causal effect in the explanation of honor killings:
- So, what we have to fill in is the relationship between inbreeding (SR) and reincarnation (HR): the inbreeding instinct.
- But also we must generate theory why resurrection (HR2) unsuccessfully tried to replace reincarnation (HR1), what created the devastating effect of honor killings.
Both effects are described extensively on this blog. The inbreeding instinct is a mega-effect from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), which caused not many honor killings, because fertility stress and reincarnation were well understood grounds for cousin marriage in those days. But Islam, thinking to be able to replace the inbreeding instinct by heavenly resurrection, is the real cause of honor killings. This was a bridge too far, after the compromise of Abraham. This means, honor killings have always been there, but must have increased enormously in the last 1400 years.
The effects of honor killings were so frightening, that they bolstered a worldwide fear of the atrocities of the Muslim community, because if you are willing to go so low on human values, you must have a deterrent religion, be a horrible people.
And determent intimidation means another ground for honor killings as an integral aspect of the Muslim faith. It underlines the gruesome nature of Islam. Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith. And the effects on the Muslim population are devastating as well. Muslims hate honor killings, nobody really wants them, but somehow it generates respect under Muslims for Islam as well.
Assumption 467: Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith.
Even when after ages the devastating effects or honor killings became clear, Islam did not relax its resurrection dogma.
In modern terms Islam looks somewhat like a 'terror organization' and its believers as victims falling in love with their oppressors (the Stockholm syndrome in SM-dyad).
The picture below shows vector projections from the former culture of reincarnation (red) and the later culture of resurrection (pink) on the plain of Islam (better: the Muslim faith), where they create the psychotic and schizophrenic mess of honor killings. I think this mess is intentionally and not accidentally created by Islamic scholars. Because I have enough suspicion that this all was exactly known 1400 years ago. So, honor killings were intentionally created by Islam.
But, although resurrection was a function of reincarnation in the construction of the Muslim faith, now, 1400 years later both religions are still projecting on each others plane. Because inbreeding (SR) has not disappeared and the inbreeding instinct is much stronger than faith in resurrection. Without these two degrees of freedom one cannot understand the Muslim faith.
Pink is later in time than red, therefore resurrection must be a function of reincarnation. So, here we combine HR2 = f(HR1) with HR = f(SR):
Christianity is easy, since it broke with inbreeding and incest and was only embraced by outbred peoples:
Islam and Christianity are the extremes of the sadomasochistic dimension, which will collapse into the origin under lustful gravity:
Christian women have been in the majority since women's suffrage in the Western world. They replaced SM-dyad by Vanilla-dyad, which is unnatural:
Western women in powerful positions have everything, have it all but are sexually frustrated and unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad. This sounds ridiculously, I agree, but again, it solves the religion of Policor (political correctness) excellently. Combined with fading Christianity and Marxist relativism, this sexual component explains everything. All to find on this blog:
Women in top positions of politics and society are ruining Western culture in their unconscious search for sexual lust. Their policor (political correctness) yearns to real men again, now projected into SM-dyad from Islam. But they don't know, don't realize. So, Merkel doesn't realize why she drags all those immigrants into former Christianity, leading to Chrislam. Ask her, and she will answer it's all because of Christian values:
Christianity signifies masochistic yearning for sadism. Below are not my words:
Here we see how new religions are born out of sexuality. We are witnessing the birth of a new star in the sexual firmament: CHRISLAM
Why is sexuality sublimated?
In polytheistic cultures like the old Greeks the link between sexuality and 'religion' was quite visible, not to say there was no difference. But as soon as females are enforced inbreeding - where they naturally yearn to outbreeding - sexuality looses authority. Sexuality is not convincing for women, knowing males all too well.
So in monotheism (inbreeding) sexuality has been sublimated by ridiculous spells. It has become a transcendental metaphysical incantation. A good example is the Tree of Knowledge, which gives the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding.
But Desert Religions malformed this myth into something about 'good and evil'. God wanted inbreeding (good) in the original Myth of Paradise. Eve, who practiced 'evil' (bad) with the Serpent from another tribe, offered their child, the hybrid apple - or whatever translation - to Adam, who also was expelled from "Paradise" because he did not control his wife effectively:
The collapse of Islam after Christianity
The Muslim faith is a hybrid combination from Islam (HR) and Inbreeding (SR). Furthermore, resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1). But for Islam to terrorize reincarnation there must remain an awful strategy. But just like Christianity, the other Desert Religion, Islam's power is fading away.
Because the Muslim population is losing grip on females. Females who cannot be kept ignorant any longer, women with higher education than Muslim males, women with social media and smart phones. This all makes control on females illusive and that means the power of Islam (HR) over the former Inbreeding religion (SR) will diminish in 30 years. And that means resurrection (HR2) will lose its grip in favor of reincarnation (HR1), where the latter is based on the very powerful inbreeding instinct:
Islam will not disappear in name, but its religious strength will diminish. As long as the Muslim-group is maintained as an identifiable group there will be cultural and sexual developments. Predictably, the much stronger inbreeding instinct will leave a mark, especially on Arab and Asian original Muslims.
In the rebound earthly reincarnation (HR1) will overthrow heavenly resurrection (HR2), on which reincarnation becomes HR3 and a function of resurrection: HR3 = f(HR2=f(HR1)).
Earthly reincarnation (now HR1) becomes the 'new' religion called HR3.
So, a real interactive time series expansion can be expected. It all depends on social developments in the coming decades.
But also with the rise of HR3 (Inbreeding) are big changes to expected, because educated women will start to doubt the relationship between inbreeding and reincarnation as well as the parallel universe of Islam (HR). Maybe they merge with Christianity into Chrislam, a lot is written about Chrislam on this blog. So, Muslim women may not be involved with reincarnation (HR3) any longer because they do not believe this anymore. It will be a very complicated but most interesting development to derive in advance.
Authentic Muslims and newly Muslims
Following mtDNA L3N and L3M, only Arabs and Asians are authentic Muslims, possessing the inbreeding instinct from the Arabian Peninsula, 60-50 thousand years ago:
So, a billion Muslims are newly recruited Muslims. For example, Boko Haram in Nigeria practice outbreeding and that's why they recently captured a lot of juvenile females from neighboring tribes for outcrossing. Boko Haram are clearly newly Muslims without the inbreeding instinct.
Therefore, Boko Haram cannot regress to Inbreeding (SR), because they come from Voodoo (outbreeding) and so they will regress further into criminality from Australopithecus (Egotheism).
This means the Muslim faith will split up into:
1) Powerless Islam, women merging with Christianity into Chrislam.
2) Reincarnation with Inbreeding for Arab and Asian Muslims.
3) Criminality for newly Muslims in the religious mantle of the Muslim faith (Boko Haram).
4) Atheistic women.
For all these developments we can describe how they will be derived from the Muslim faith. All must be tied to Sexual Religion in HR= f(SR) and all must follow earlier religions in HR(x+1)= f(HR(x)). And of course, many more derivatives are conceivable. But for all 'new' religions it applies that they are at odds with previous religions, so that we can predict the course of events.
The evolution of religious concepts
In the evolution of religious concepts, reincarnation came about two million years before resurrection. So, reincarnation must be a much stronger and deeper lying concept than resurrection.
And rebirth below is not the usual 'rebirth' concept and quite different from resurrection:
What are the preconditions for the solution of honor killings?
Inbreeding is an unconscious Muslim male instinct
- Firstly, every year thousands of Muslim fathers kill their daughters without consulting other fathers, so there is no mutual contact among males. And this horrible act of killing their daughters also comes not from some weird and simple cultural narrative as 'honor of the family'. That begs the question, why are all these males committing the same crime at about the same moment in the development of their daughters? How come?
Would it be culture. Yeah, of course, culture does something. But to murder your daughter because of the opinion of the neighbours? Don't buy it. And now the juridical aspect. If every year two thousand fathers - without consultation - kill their adolescent daughters, is this sort of coincidence or is there a hidden general cause beyond their will? Is there circumstantial evidence that individual fathers are not totally responsible for what they have done, although legally guilty?
Don't get me wrong, where I want to emphasize that those killers are fully responsible for their deeds, with full liability for the law. But with hatred alone we cannot solve this problem.
A general cause was one of my bigger problems, of course because I already thought about the inbreeding instinct. But this was the reason to give that instinct a rational place in the chain of command to the kill. Otherwise personal liability for individual fathers would be too coincidental.
We conclude, in special situations Muslim males must be pre-programmed to honor killings. That's why they need no consultation with others, because they feel inside what to do. And this lowest level of horribly human functioning must be dictated by a much stronger impulse than that weird narrative of 'honor of the family', it must be caused by an instinct. So, there must be an unconscious underlying trait in the population, a kind of male inherited inbreeding instinct:
Assumption 336: The inbreeding instinct is a human instinct developed somewhere between Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and the Arabian Peninsula (Homo sapiens, 60-50 Kya; 1450cc). It is a typical male instinct which aims at earthly reincarnation into tribal inbred bodies enforced by cousin marriages. It is still vividly present in the Muslim culture. But maybe there was an earlier variant aiming at 'rebirth without soul' from Homo naledi (2.3 Mya; 550cc). But we reserve the inbreeding instinct for reincarnation with the soul.
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
'Honor of the family' is the wrong reason for honor killing
- Secondly, slicing your daughter into pieces is not especially the way of attributing 'honor to your family'. 'Honor' is a religious concept from Australopithecus (7 Mya; 400cc), combined with fertility stress, where daughters had to sacrifice their outbreeding instinct for 'cousin marriages' to prevent extinction of the species:
What we see above is that especially bipedal primates - living in groups together - developed a proneness to inbreeding as a way of life, and much later as a religion. So, inbreeding is fundamental to the core of human religion (genetic monoculture). All other (solitary) animals position themselves at the outbreeding pole of the basic dimension (genetic diversity).
We conclude: inbreeding is a sickness of human religion. Until Homo sapiens, previous hominins could stand inbreeding rather well because of their varied chimp like genome, but now it's devastating and developing massively autosomal recessive disorders.
So, we must take inbreeding very seriously as root of human religion. Then the question is which ancient religions could not get rid of inbreeding in the evolution? Well, the rank order on the basic dimension from inbreeding to outbreeding gives the degree of development in human religion. What kind of cultural development?
This dimension turns out to be parallel with 'respect for other sexual roles', especially for women. Females instinctively reject inbreeding as sick and unnatural and detrimental to the genetic variability of the species. Therefore Islam is lowest on the cultural ranking:
Women adhere outbreeding and that's why juvenile chimp females sneaky leave the tribe on their search for a new tribe, three trees farther away. Also human girls break more often with their parents than boys, except maybe in your case.
So, in inbreeding cultures females hate religion because it is used in SM-dyad to force them into inbreeding. Although they are also addicted to their masochistic role. Suffering is lust in masochism ...
Substituting 'honor' for reincarnation:
Proceeding with our former discussion: If 'honor of the family' is substituted for 'earthly reincarnation' the plot fits. That's also exactly what we hear from Muslim fathers, 'honor of the family' was the reason of the kill. Apparently, Muslims went back in the evolution to justify cousin marriages by 'honor' again. How come? Somehow, they must have regressed to 'honor of the family'.
So, I had to address non-communication between Muslim fathers and 'honor of the family', which is a terrible psychopathic dissonant.
The real reason for honor killings is earthly reincarnation
The ancient, but still alive inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus states that ancestors from inbreeding cultures demand genetically identical descendants for reincarnation. In those days you didn't want to reincarnate into hostile tribes. So, ancestors were thought to refuse reincarnation into tribes without cousin marriages, while their return on Earth was really needed for tribal survival because that lowered fertility stress (FS: low breeding numbers from bipedal primates). Of course, ancestors were nothing more than self-projections from males and were only used to create religious authority in women for inbreeding.
Remark: Early hominins and also Homo erectus had a much more varied genome and could resist inbreeding much better than Homo sapiens.
And guess what, this ancient instinct, this belief in reincarnation is much stronger than nowadays enforced belief in resurrection. But the problem is reincarnation has dived into the unconscious, whereas resurrection is conscious. This means, Muslims lost track on reincarnation.
Why has reincarnation become unconscious?
In history, Muslims are forced - on pain of death - to believe in resurrection in heaven from Allah in the parallel universe. So, believing in earthly reincarnation meant the death penalty in the last 1400 years. This means, Muslim fathers must have suppressed reincarnation as reason for cousin marriages in their unconscious and have fallen back, have regressed to the earlier ground for cousin marriages called 'honor of the family'.
The link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages is broken
So, the conclusion must be the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriage is broken in the conscious of Muslim fathers, but also in the minds of their daughters, who don't see any reason for being family semen incubator any longer. So, Muslims don't know any longer wherever honor killings are good for, but this inbreeding instinct is still vividly alive in their unconscious.
Now, think about it. You have an irresistible instinct for inbreeding, but you don't know why. But it is because you want to reincarnate into the pure tribal genetic descendants from your daughter.
Well, you dearly love your daughter, but if she refuses a forced marriage with her cousin, then you will end up in a psychotic conflict with this unwilling daughter. Not because you are a beast in the first place, but because you do not understand your own motives. You don't want to get lost in the universe as a ghost after death, a ghost who can't return into his own tribe any more, because of that damned hybrid descendant as the apple from Eve.
Muslim fathers want to reincarnate into their own tribal genes from cousin marriages
All honor killings because of pregnancy, abortion*, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc, have the same ground: Muslim fathers unconsciously, panically fear to reincarnate into offspring with mixed, hybrid genes. Because then, after their next death they are not pure tribal members any longer and will not be allowed to reincarnate into their own tribe again. But remember, they don't realize the reason of their panic fear, they think it's because of 'honor of the family', whatever that may be:
* Abortion means an ancestor has already been killed and possibly had first become a hybrid. This definitely deserves the death penalty.
Some remarks
A second remark is that total inbreeding is impossible and families make assessments that bears their approval. They can choose partners in whose descendants they don't object to reincarnate, usually persons from the same ethnicity. And they may also sell their daughters if they have little trouble with the inbreeding instinct.
A third remark is that a billion Muslims are not authentic Arab or Asian Muslims. Pakistani are original Muslims with the inbreeding instinct inherited (mtDNA L3M). But Boko Haram (mtDNA L2), captured 200 juvenile females lately from other tribes for breeding. That's outbreeding, since they originally came from outbreeding cultures. They do not have the inbreeding instinct inherited.
A rational explanation of honor killings
Although this explanation of honor killings may seem weird at first sight, this is not the case. Islam repressing reincarnation is a rational ground for fear. Furthermore, honor killers are usually in a psychotic delusional mood in which their unconscious steers their behavior beyond their conscious will. Therefore, they will disagree with this explanation and see themselves as quite normal. But themselves, they have no explanation for their behavior, except that ridiculous 'honor of the family', meaning they have none. They really don't know what they are doing, they are acting instinctively. They might see themselves as quite normal, what underlines their sickness.
A fight on life and death
So, what happens is simply a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter. If she refuses this cousin marriage, he will be lost forever as a ghost in the universe. That's a fight on life and death. And now we have the right parameters to give honor killings the right embedding, we must search for a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter.
So why is he killing her? Because if she is dead there is no risk to reincarnate into a hybrid anymore.
The heuristic value of the theory
A theory should be falsifiable and possibly parsimonious. Above theory will not easily be falsified, is very simple and gives an all inclusive explanation for honor killings committed because of pregnancy, abortion, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc. As long as we can predict honor killings on the basis of this theory it is useful and valuable. This means, it does not need to be true in the first place, although after seven years of painstaking introspection I found no other rational theory. Would there be one, I would definitely have found it.
The theory might be falsified for psychosis, because I think the suppressed belief in reincarnation leads to a psychotic state in honor killers. Then, it is possible to make the postulated inbreeding instinct conscious again, so that the psychotic state of Muslim males is removed. Then, we expect a decrease in honor killings by preventing psychosis. This would sustain the theory.
But a side effect can be that information about reincarnation just strengthens perpetrators in their belief and their willingness to kill, but then without psychosis. Then, they would deserve a suitable punishment in case of honor killings. A punishment without leniency.
Islam rejected the compromise of the Myth of Abraham
Assumption 468: Earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
Originally, the Myth of Abraham was meant for outbreeding cultures in which the male kin bonded lineage (from Abraham) took women from other tribes for marriage.
This because the myth does not speak of tribal cousin marriages explicitly and Negro-descendants were all over the place. So, that looks like outbreeding, originally.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
Outbreeding cultures:
In Voodoo, humans reincarnate on Earth and gods live in some parallel universe. That's the compromise from Abraham with God. It reflects the common religious attitude of Homo sapiens from far before the onset of the Desert Religions. That's a time lapse of 350,000-1400 = 348,600 years. But we arbitrarily set the Myth of Abraham at min 10,000 years:
I think the Myth of Paradise (boys initiation rite) originates from Australopithecus - speech not necessary - and the Myth of Abraham is a tradition from minus 350,000 years, because then Homo sapiens was already well developed to invent the parallel universe.
Abraham offered to kill his only (tribal) son Isaac to make earthly reincarnation into his descendants impossible and to prove his belief in God. But God was wise and accepted the compromise in which Abraham indeed worshipped the only God in heaven and rejected his ancestors as idols, on which humans still were allowed to reincarnate on earth. This means wise people wanted a compromise.
Inbreeding cultures:
Again, earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
For inbreeding we must change the interpretation of the myth:
Homo sapiens is the first hominin species with a seriously declined genome, see the supervolcano of Mount Toba. Therefore, the Myth of Abraham got a somewhat different meaning when inbreeding led to more and more autosomal recessive disorders.
Many thousands of years ago scholars knew very well that the inbreeding instinct was meant for earthly reincarnation into the own family. They also knew it was senseless to try to curb inbreeding into outbreeding, because of the inbreeding instinct. Then Islam simply forbade reincarnation totally and enforced resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe of Allah. This way, scholars might have hoped the inbreeding instinct would fade out too. Or they purposely tried to make a schizophrenic religion from the merge of reincarnation and resurrection, in which they succeeded very well.
So, Islam tried to curb 'inbreeding by reincarnation' to 'outbreeding by resurrection in the parallel universe'.
As said before, Islam rejected the compromise from Abraham and forbade earthly reincarnation on pain of death. The disruption of the stimulus-response chain from inbreeding to reincarnation is the real cause of honor killings. Therefore Islam bears the blame for honor killings.
BTW, understand that the inbreeding instinct dilutes by merging with outbred populations. Also that fully inbreeding cannot exist. Forty percent cousin marriages over a whole population is manageable.
Abraham's reverse honor killing
Killing your son to counter your reincarnation instinct, that's kind of heavy as well, that's very serious. That's psychopathic in feeling and psychotic in the execution. It falls in the same class as honor killings. To be precise, Abraham wanted to perform a 'reverse honor killing' on his son Isaac, what is on the same scale, on the same inhuman dimension. Abraham wanted to transfer the honor for his ancestors from earthly reincarnation (by inbreeding) to the honor for God from heavenly resurrection (outbreeding) (see this blog).
Thus, Abraham proposed what later Islam really performed: Islam extinguished earthly reincarnation. But God was wiser and proposed the Sacrifice Feast compromise:
Sacrifice Feast celebrates earthly reincarnation
There are a lot of myths in the Tanakh, so why are Muslims so delighted especially with the Sacrifice Feast. Would they unconsciously desire to return to earthly reincarnation? Would they be not faithful to Allah? Are they afraid of the final judgment of Allah? Is that why they want to return to Voodoo, to Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc)? Is that why they love this simple feast? If Muslims knew what the Feast of Sacrifice really means, it would be forbidden instantly:
How to prevent further honor killings
If this reasoning is correct the number of honor killings could be drastically lowered by raising awareness of Muslim males from the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages. Because the main reason for honor killings is the psychotic mental state of Muslim males, who do not understand what is happening.
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
Honor killings, how it's made:
Eight years I searched for the cause of honor killings, from which I offered one year to my country for the MH17. I tried all strategies, dived deep into my unconscious for the sense of atmosphere around honor killings. That's how unconscious alignment works. It has been a rollercoaster of emotions, a horrible psychotic experience which was triggered by my immense anger about the killing of Sadia Sheikh. It struck me so deeply that I was determined once and for all, to resolve honor killings and religion altogether. I built my own religious model out of the animal world.
 |
| Sadia Sheikh R.I.P. |
I was shocked about how previously loving fathers could change into most brutal, horrible and gruesome animals. It was unbelievable. And after the kill they showed some cold and apathetic behavior. It is like psychosis, not able to differentiate between delusion and reality anymore. The satisfaction from the kill in the inner world of delusion, against the cold shower from the horror and anger of the outside world. To what extent were those fathers really aware of their situation? That's the core problem. And to solve this problem one must show empathy with these brutal murderers, but of course, no sympathy.
The crazy thing is I already owned the solution of this drama right from the beginning, but had no model. The model demands two degrees of freedom: Human religion (HR) and Sexual Religion (SR). But I was functional fixed and always thought Human Religion equals sublimated Animal Sexuality (SR), on the same degree of freedom. So, I came not at the idea of HR = f(SR), though sublimation delivered exactly (f), the second degree of freedom.
I wrote all possible scenarios and in the end I came out on the rational explanation of an impossible contrast between earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection:
I really think this is the best thinkable rational ground for honor killings. If there was another, let alone better solution, I would definitely have known. But there isn't.
So, now we have the formula, the model HR = f(SR), in which honor killings take place. But we still have to find the rationale of honor killings in this plot. So, what was the Muslim father thinking and how was his daughter reacting. The model only gives the precondition for the psychological diagnosis we have to make.
But we also know resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1), measured over time: HR2 = f(HR1). And again, we have two degrees of freedom to find the solution for honor killings. And this alternative function - theoretically based on a time series expansion - tells us Islam forbade earthly reincarnation, what is the crux to understanding honor killings. So, the conditions lie in the formula, which we have to interpret.
Resuming, for the explanation of honor killings we need Islam as Human Religion (HR), dependent on Inbreeding as Sexual Religion (SR), but we also need resurrection from (HR2) caused by reincarnation from (HR1). So, resurrection (outbreeding) and reincarnation (inbreeding) are based on the basic dimension in HR = f(SR), but are also connected in time, wherein reincarnation precedes resurrection in HR2 = f(HR1). Together this creates a strong causal effect in the explanation of honor killings:
- So, what we have to fill in is the relationship between inbreeding (SR) and reincarnation (HR): the inbreeding instinct.
- But also we must generate theory why resurrection (HR2) unsuccessfully tried to replace reincarnation (HR1), what created the devastating effect of honor killings.
Both effects are described extensively on this blog. The inbreeding instinct is a mega-effect from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), which caused not many honor killings, because fertility stress and reincarnation were well understood grounds for cousin marriage in those days. But Islam, thinking to be able to replace the inbreeding instinct by heavenly resurrection, is the real cause of honor killings. This was a bridge too far, after the compromise of Abraham. This means, honor killings have always been there, but must have increased enormously in the last 1400 years.
The effects of honor killings were so frightening, that they bolstered a worldwide fear of the atrocities of the Muslim community, because if you are willing to go so low on human values, you must have a deterrent religion, be a horrible people.
And determent intimidation means another ground for honor killings as an integral aspect of the Muslim faith. It underlines the gruesome nature of Islam. Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith. And the effects on the Muslim population are devastating as well. Muslims hate honor killings, nobody really wants them, but somehow it generates respect under Muslims for Islam as well.
Assumption 467: Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith.
Even when after ages the devastating effects or honor killings became clear, Islam did not relax its resurrection dogma.
In modern terms Islam looks somewhat like a 'terror organization' and its believers as victims falling in love with their oppressors (the Stockholm syndrome in SM-dyad).
The picture below shows vector projections from the former culture of reincarnation (red) and the later culture of resurrection (pink) on the plain of Islam (better: the Muslim faith), where they create the psychotic and schizophrenic mess of honor killings. I think this mess is intentionally and not accidentally created by Islamic scholars. Because I have enough suspicion that this all was exactly known 1400 years ago. So, honor killings were intentionally created by Islam.
But, although resurrection was a function of reincarnation in the construction of the Muslim faith, now, 1400 years later both religions are still projecting on each others plane. Because inbreeding (SR) has not disappeared and the inbreeding instinct is much stronger than faith in resurrection. Without these two degrees of freedom one cannot understand the Muslim faith.
Pink is later in time than red, therefore resurrection must be a function of reincarnation. So, here we combine HR2 = f(HR1) with HR = f(SR):
Christianity is easy, since it broke with inbreeding and incest and was only embraced by outbred peoples:
Islam and Christianity are the extremes of the sadomasochistic dimension, which will collapse into the origin under lustful gravity:
Christian women have been in the majority since women's suffrage in the Western world. They replaced SM-dyad by Vanilla-dyad, which is unnatural:
Western women in powerful positions have everything, have it all but are sexually frustrated and unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad. This sounds ridiculously, I agree, but again, it solves the religion of Policor (political correctness) excellently. Combined with fading Christianity and Marxist relativism, this sexual component explains everything. All to find on this blog:
Women in top positions of politics and society are ruining Western culture in their unconscious search for sexual lust. Their policor (political correctness) yearns to real men again, now projected into SM-dyad from Islam. But they don't know, don't realize. So, Merkel doesn't realize why she drags all those immigrants into former Christianity, leading to Chrislam. Ask her, and she will answer it's all because of Christian values:
Christianity signifies masochistic yearning for sadism. Below are not my words:
Here we see how new religions are born out of sexuality. We are witnessing the birth of a new star in the sexual firmament: CHRISLAM
Why is sexuality sublimated?
In polytheistic cultures like the old Greeks the link between sexuality and 'religion' was quite visible, not to say there was no difference. But as soon as females are enforced inbreeding - where they naturally yearn to outbreeding - sexuality looses authority. Sexuality is not convincing for women, knowing males all too well.
So in monotheism (inbreeding) sexuality has been sublimated by ridiculous spells. It has become a transcendental metaphysical incantation. A good example is the Tree of Knowledge, which gives the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding.
But Desert Religions malformed this myth into something about 'good and evil'. God wanted inbreeding (good) in the original Myth of Paradise. Eve, who practiced 'evil' (bad) with the Serpent from another tribe, offered their child, the hybrid apple - or whatever translation - to Adam, who also was expelled from "Paradise" because he did not control his wife effectively:
The collapse of Islam after Christianity
The Muslim faith is a hybrid combination from Islam (HR) and Inbreeding (SR). Furthermore, resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1). But for Islam to terrorize reincarnation there must remain an awful strategy. But just like Christianity, the other Desert Religion, Islam's power is fading away.
Because the Muslim population is losing grip on females. Females who cannot be kept ignorant any longer, women with higher education than Muslim males, women with social media and smart phones. This all makes control on females illusive and that means the power of Islam (HR) over the former Inbreeding religion (SR) will diminish in 30 years. And that means resurrection (HR2) will lose its grip in favor of reincarnation (HR1), where the latter is based on the very powerful inbreeding instinct:
Islam will not disappear in name, but its religious strength will diminish. As long as the Muslim-group is maintained as an identifiable group there will be cultural and sexual developments. Predictably, the much stronger inbreeding instinct will leave a mark, especially on Arab and Asian original Muslims.
In the rebound earthly reincarnation (HR1) will overthrow heavenly resurrection (HR2), on which reincarnation becomes HR3 and a function of resurrection: HR3 = f(HR2=f(HR1)).
Earthly reincarnation (now HR1) becomes the 'new' religion called HR3.
So, a real interactive time series expansion can be expected. It all depends on social developments in the coming decades.
But also with the rise of HR3 (Inbreeding) are big changes to expected, because educated women will start to doubt the relationship between inbreeding and reincarnation as well as the parallel universe of Islam (HR). Maybe they merge with Christianity into Chrislam, a lot is written about Chrislam on this blog. So, Muslim women may not be involved with reincarnation (HR3) any longer because they do not believe this anymore. It will be a very complicated but most interesting development to derive in advance.
Authentic Muslims and newly Muslims
Following mtDNA L3N and L3M, only Arabs and Asians are authentic Muslims, possessing the inbreeding instinct from the Arabian Peninsula, 60-50 thousand years ago:
So, a billion Muslims are newly recruited Muslims. For example, Boko Haram in Nigeria practice outbreeding and that's why they recently captured a lot of juvenile females from neighboring tribes for outcrossing. Boko Haram are clearly newly Muslims without the inbreeding instinct.
Therefore, Boko Haram cannot regress to Inbreeding (SR), because they come from Voodoo (outbreeding) and so they will regress further into criminality from Australopithecus (Egotheism).
This means the Muslim faith will split up into:
1) Powerless Islam, women merging with Christianity into Chrislam.
2) Reincarnation with Inbreeding for Arab and Asian Muslims.
3) Criminality for newly Muslims in the religious mantle of the Muslim faith (Boko Haram).
4) Atheistic women.
For all these developments we can describe how they will be derived from the Muslim faith. All must be tied to Sexual Religion in HR= f(SR) and all must follow earlier religions in HR(x+1)= f(HR(x)). And of course, many more derivatives are conceivable. But for all 'new' religions it applies that they are at odds with previous religions, so that we can predict the course of events.
The evolution of religious concepts
In the evolution of religious concepts, reincarnation came about two million years before resurrection. So, reincarnation must be a much stronger and deeper lying concept than resurrection.
And rebirth below is not the usual 'rebirth' concept and quite different from resurrection:
What are the preconditions for the solution of honor killings?
Inbreeding is an unconscious Muslim male instinct
- Firstly, every year thousands of Muslim fathers kill their daughters without consulting other fathers, so there is no mutual contact among males. And this horrible act of killing their daughters also comes not from some weird and simple cultural narrative as 'honor of the family'. That begs the question, why are all these males committing the same crime at about the same moment in the development of their daughters? How come?
Would it be culture. Yeah, of course, culture does something. But to murder your daughter because of the opinion of the neighbours? Don't buy it. And now the juridical aspect. If every year two thousand fathers - without consultation - kill their adolescent daughters, is this sort of coincidence or is there a hidden general cause beyond their will? Is there circumstantial evidence that individual fathers are not totally responsible for what they have done, although legally guilty?
Don't get me wrong, where I want to emphasize that those killers are fully responsible for their deeds, with full liability for the law. But with hatred alone we cannot solve this problem.
A general cause was one of my bigger problems, of course because I already thought about the inbreeding instinct. But this was the reason to give that instinct a rational place in the chain of command to the kill. Otherwise personal liability for individual fathers would be too coincidental.
We conclude, in special situations Muslim males must be pre-programmed to honor killings. That's why they need no consultation with others, because they feel inside what to do. And this lowest level of horribly human functioning must be dictated by a much stronger impulse than that weird narrative of 'honor of the family', it must be caused by an instinct. So, there must be an unconscious underlying trait in the population, a kind of male inherited inbreeding instinct:
Assumption 336: The inbreeding instinct is a human instinct developed somewhere between Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and the Arabian Peninsula (Homo sapiens, 60-50 Kya; 1450cc). It is a typical male instinct which aims at earthly reincarnation into tribal inbred bodies enforced by cousin marriages. It is still vividly present in the Muslim culture. But maybe there was an earlier variant aiming at 'rebirth without soul' from Homo naledi (2.3 Mya; 550cc). But we reserve the inbreeding instinct for reincarnation with the soul.
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
'Honor of the family' is the wrong reason for honor killing
- Secondly, slicing your daughter into pieces is not especially the way of attributing 'honor to your family'. 'Honor' is a religious concept from Australopithecus (7 Mya; 400cc), combined with fertility stress, where daughters had to sacrifice their outbreeding instinct for 'cousin marriages' to prevent extinction of the species:
What we see above is that especially bipedal primates - living in groups together - developed a proneness to inbreeding as a way of life, and much later as a religion. So, inbreeding is fundamental to the core of human religion (genetic monoculture). All other (solitary) animals position themselves at the outbreeding pole of the basic dimension (genetic diversity).
We conclude: inbreeding is a sickness of human religion. Until Homo sapiens, previous hominins could stand inbreeding rather well because of their varied chimp like genome, but now it's devastating and developing massively autosomal recessive disorders.
So, we must take inbreeding very seriously as root of human religion. Then the question is which ancient religions could not get rid of inbreeding in the evolution? Well, the rank order on the basic dimension from inbreeding to outbreeding gives the degree of development in human religion. What kind of cultural development?
This dimension turns out to be parallel with 'respect for other sexual roles', especially for women. Females instinctively reject inbreeding as sick and unnatural and detrimental to the genetic variability of the species. Therefore Islam is lowest on the cultural ranking:
It turns out respecting 'other sexual roles' (outbreeding) is the high point of human civilization. And now you see where culture, civilization, sexuality and religion find their intersection: showing respect for other sexual roles, especially women:
Women adhere outbreeding and that's why juvenile chimp females sneaky leave the tribe on their search for a new tribe, three trees farther away. Also human girls break more often with their parents than boys, except maybe in your case.
So, in inbreeding cultures females hate religion because it is used in SM-dyad to force them into inbreeding. Although they are also addicted to their masochistic role. Suffering is lust in masochism ...
Substituting 'honor' for reincarnation:
Proceeding with our former discussion: If 'honor of the family' is substituted for 'earthly reincarnation' the plot fits. That's also exactly what we hear from Muslim fathers, 'honor of the family' was the reason of the kill. Apparently, Muslims went back in the evolution to justify cousin marriages by 'honor' again. How come? Somehow, they must have regressed to 'honor of the family'.
So, I had to address non-communication between Muslim fathers and 'honor of the family', which is a terrible psychopathic dissonant.
The real reason for honor killings is earthly reincarnation
The ancient, but still alive inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus states that ancestors from inbreeding cultures demand genetically identical descendants for reincarnation. In those days you didn't want to reincarnate into hostile tribes. So, ancestors were thought to refuse reincarnation into tribes without cousin marriages, while their return on Earth was really needed for tribal survival because that lowered fertility stress (FS: low breeding numbers from bipedal primates). Of course, ancestors were nothing more than self-projections from males and were only used to create religious authority in women for inbreeding.
And guess what, this ancient instinct, this belief in reincarnation is much stronger than nowadays enforced belief in resurrection. But the problem is reincarnation has dived into the unconscious, whereas resurrection is conscious. This means, Muslims lost track on reincarnation.
Why has reincarnation become unconscious?
In history, Muslims are forced - on pain of death - to believe in resurrection in heaven from Allah in the parallel universe. So, believing in earthly reincarnation meant the death penalty in the last 1400 years. This means, Muslim fathers must have suppressed reincarnation as reason for cousin marriages in their unconscious and have fallen back, have regressed to the earlier ground for cousin marriages called 'honor of the family'.
The link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages is broken
So, the conclusion must be the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriage is broken in the conscious of Muslim fathers, but also in the minds of their daughters, who don't see any reason for being family semen incubator any longer. So, Muslims don't know any longer wherever honor killings are good for, but this inbreeding instinct is still vividly alive in their unconscious.
Now, think about it. You have an irresistible instinct for inbreeding, but you don't know why. But it is because you want to reincarnate into the pure tribal genetic descendants from your daughter.
Well, you dearly love your daughter, but if she refuses a forced marriage with her cousin, then you will end up in a psychotic conflict with this unwilling daughter. Not because you are a beast in the first place, but because you do not understand your own motives. You don't want to get lost in the universe as a ghost after death, a ghost who can't return into his own tribe any more, because of that damned hybrid descendant as the apple from Eve.
Muslim fathers want to reincarnate into their own tribal genes from cousin marriages
All honor killings because of pregnancy, abortion*, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc, have the same ground: Muslim fathers unconsciously, panically fear to reincarnate into offspring with mixed, hybrid genes. Because then, after their next death they are not pure tribal members any longer and will not be allowed to reincarnate into their own tribe again. But remember, they don't realize the reason of their panic fear, they think it's because of 'honor of the family', whatever that may be:
* Abortion means an ancestor has already been killed and possibly had first become a hybrid. This definitely deserves the death penalty.
Some remarks
A second remark is that total inbreeding is impossible and families make assessments that bears their approval. They can choose partners in whose descendants they don't object to reincarnate, usually persons from the same ethnicity. And they may also sell their daughters if they have little trouble with the inbreeding instinct.
A third remark is that a billion Muslims are not authentic Arab or Asian Muslims. Pakistani are original Muslims with the inbreeding instinct inherited (mtDNA L3M). But Boko Haram (mtDNA L2), captured 200 juvenile females lately from other tribes for breeding. That's outbreeding, since they originally came from outbreeding cultures. They do not have the inbreeding instinct inherited.
A rational explanation of honor killings
Although this explanation of honor killings may seem weird at first sight, this is not the case. Islam repressing reincarnation is a rational ground for fear. Furthermore, honor killers are usually in a psychotic delusional mood in which their unconscious steers their behavior beyond their conscious will. Therefore, they will disagree with this explanation and see themselves as quite normal. But themselves, they have no explanation for their behavior, except that ridiculous 'honor of the family', meaning they have none. They really don't know what they are doing, they are acting instinctively. They might see themselves as quite normal, what underlines their sickness.
A fight on life and death
So, what happens is simply a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter. If she refuses this cousin marriage, he will be lost forever as a ghost in the universe. That's a fight on life and death. And now we have the right parameters to give honor killings the right embedding, we must search for a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter.
So why is he killing her? Because if she is dead there is no risk to reincarnate into a hybrid anymore.
The heuristic value of the theory
A theory should be falsifiable and possibly parsimonious. Above theory will not easily be falsified, is very simple and gives an all inclusive explanation for honor killings committed because of pregnancy, abortion, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc. As long as we can predict honor killings on the basis of this theory it is useful and valuable. This means, it does not need to be true in the first place, although after seven years of painstaking introspection I found no other rational theory. Would there be one, I would definitely have found it.
The theory might be falsified for psychosis, because I think the suppressed belief in reincarnation leads to a psychotic state in honor killers. Then, it is possible to make the postulated inbreeding instinct conscious again, so that the psychotic state of Muslim males is removed. Then, we expect a decrease in honor killings by preventing psychosis. This would sustain the theory.
But a side effect can be that information about reincarnation just strengthens perpetrators in their belief and their willingness to kill, but then without psychosis. Then, they would deserve a suitable punishment in case of honor killings. A punishment without leniency.
Islam rejected the compromise of the Myth of Abraham
Assumption 468: Earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
Originally, the Myth of Abraham was meant for outbreeding cultures in which the male kin bonded lineage (from Abraham) took women from other tribes for marriage.
This because the myth does not speak of tribal cousin marriages explicitly and Negro-descendants were all over the place. So, that looks like outbreeding, originally.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
Outbreeding cultures:
In Voodoo, humans reincarnate on Earth and gods live in some parallel universe. That's the compromise from Abraham with God. It reflects the common religious attitude of Homo sapiens from far before the onset of the Desert Religions. That's a time lapse of 350,000-1400 = 348,600 years. But we arbitrarily set the Myth of Abraham at min 10,000 years:
I think the Myth of Paradise (boys initiation rite) originates from Australopithecus - speech not necessary - and the Myth of Abraham is a tradition from minus 350,000 years, because then Homo sapiens was already well developed to invent the parallel universe.
Abraham offered to kill his only (tribal) son Isaac to make earthly reincarnation into his descendants impossible and to prove his belief in God. But God was wise and accepted the compromise in which Abraham indeed worshipped the only God in heaven and rejected his ancestors as idols, on which humans still were allowed to reincarnate on earth. This means wise people wanted a compromise.
Inbreeding cultures:
Again, earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
For inbreeding we must change the interpretation of the myth:
God was wise and knew he could not expel the inbreeding instinct out of desert people, an instinct inherited from the Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). So, He permitted Abraham to reincarnate into the descendants of his only son Isaac. But on the other hand, Abraham had to discard earthly idols and somehow also to believe in the only God in the parallel universe. The Myth of Abraham obviously is a transitional form from the earthly universe to the parallel universe.Now understand what happened. Homo sapiens inherited earthly reincarnation from Homo erectus as an instinct and saw no reason to choose between reincarnation and resurrection. Only when the parallel universe became a source of power for the ruling class, Islam eliminated reincarnation.
Homo sapiens is the first hominin species with a seriously declined genome, see the supervolcano of Mount Toba. Therefore, the Myth of Abraham got a somewhat different meaning when inbreeding led to more and more autosomal recessive disorders.
Many thousands of years ago scholars knew very well that the inbreeding instinct was meant for earthly reincarnation into the own family. They also knew it was senseless to try to curb inbreeding into outbreeding, because of the inbreeding instinct. Then Islam simply forbade reincarnation totally and enforced resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe of Allah. This way, scholars might have hoped the inbreeding instinct would fade out too. Or they purposely tried to make a schizophrenic religion from the merge of reincarnation and resurrection, in which they succeeded very well.
So, Islam tried to curb 'inbreeding by reincarnation' to 'outbreeding by resurrection in the parallel universe'.
As said before, Islam rejected the compromise from Abraham and forbade earthly reincarnation on pain of death. The disruption of the stimulus-response chain from inbreeding to reincarnation is the real cause of honor killings. Therefore Islam bears the blame for honor killings.
BTW, understand that the inbreeding instinct dilutes by merging with outbred populations. Also that fully inbreeding cannot exist. Forty percent cousin marriages over a whole population is manageable.
Abraham's reverse honor killing
Killing your son to counter your reincarnation instinct, that's kind of heavy as well, that's very serious. That's psychopathic in feeling and psychotic in the execution. It falls in the same class as honor killings. To be precise, Abraham wanted to perform a 'reverse honor killing' on his son Isaac, what is on the same scale, on the same inhuman dimension. Abraham wanted to transfer the honor for his ancestors from earthly reincarnation (by inbreeding) to the honor for God from heavenly resurrection (outbreeding) (see this blog).
Thus, Abraham proposed what later Islam really performed: Islam extinguished earthly reincarnation. But God was wiser and proposed the Sacrifice Feast compromise:
Sacrifice Feast celebrates earthly reincarnation
There are a lot of myths in the Tanakh, so why are Muslims so delighted especially with the Sacrifice Feast. Would they unconsciously desire to return to earthly reincarnation? Would they be not faithful to Allah? Are they afraid of the final judgment of Allah? Is that why they want to return to Voodoo, to Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc)? Is that why they love this simple feast? If Muslims knew what the Feast of Sacrifice really means, it would be forbidden instantly:
How to prevent further honor killings
If this reasoning is correct the number of honor killings could be drastically lowered by raising awareness of Muslim males from the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages. Because the main reason for honor killings is the psychotic mental state of Muslim males, who do not understand what is happening.
No comments:
Post a Comment