Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
If we can find the basic dimension, the main factor governing the human mind, we have got a powerful means to understand and forecast further human behavior. Probably the distinction is monotheism versus polytheism, under the condition of 'gods are sexual roles'.
Likely, a bunch of variables clustering together on the extremes of the monotheism-polytheism factor is the blueprint of the human mind. Likely, since we do not have any data, it is all theorie built from hundreds of assumptions.
We developed human religion from animal sexuality and guess what, it works better than expected. Of course, I am the steering factor myself, without any real data, so I can be responsible for a fake 'basic dimension'. But surprisingly, the about 370 assumptions are in full agreement and they are not changed in retrospect. Of course, new assumptions must fit earlier ones, what restricts expanding the theory in a different direction.
Well, if I was the illigitemate steering factor, the whole blog would have turned into a random mess. But that is not the case, since the theory gets more and more content validity. Anyway, we arrived at a simpeler blueprint of religion than I had thought.
The social sciences are like a barrel with syrup. If one variable is drawn out, the rest is pulled along. Everything is connected to everything, so that the blueprint from the human mind can come down to a global main factor: monotheism versus polytheism.
But the bundle of variables in the blueprint above is still chaotic in its interrelations. The only thing we know is they likely belong together. Better to say they all are aspects of the same basic dimension. For example 'sadism' is a male trait that occurs while torturing women. It only happens structurally in monotheism (SM-dyad), where male heterosexuality is in charge and determines the first God. This kind of sadism does not show any empathy with women.
If the human mind is governed by a simple sexual structure, we can predict what everybody already is expecting: the Muslim war in Europe:
Former Christian policor females who are in charge in politics crave to SM-dyad, but do not realize:
Also, civil war in the States easily follows mass immigration from Latin Americans:
Or North Americans against South Americans:
Another possibility is Republicans against Democrats.
It is our opinion that the dimension of monotheism-polytheism is the most fundamental of the cultural showdowns in history. This under the condition of 'gods are sexual roles'.
Religious wars were sexual wars in which sadomasochism as the basic dimension of sexuality had a prominent place. But all conflicts about power are ultimately based on sexuality. The sexual domain in the male's head is the center of power and might.
The final basic dimension is monotheism versus polytheism
It is kind of shocking that the basic dimension of the human mind always gets a deeper ground. Ultimately only one dimension seems decisive for mankind. And that is the difference between monotheism and polytheism, if applied to the number of sexual roles allowed in a culture:
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
For example, the difference between white male supremacy and LGBT of today is comparable with the conflict around 'earthly reincarnation' between male heterosexuality and 'other sexual roles' from Homo erectus two million years ago.
The key to human religion is males choosing for their own well being or for equality of females:
In the same flow we show older blueprints: Islam versus Christianity:
This is in accordance with the Sexual Model of Religion:
And the derivation of human religion from animal religion:
ADDENDUM
Assumption 4: The physiological archetype of God led to the sense of God. The feeling that something has to be. But also on the desire to be a God on oneself and to exercise sexual power oneself. Because otherwise such a projection does not make sense.
Assumption 6: All human power has a sexual component: sadomasochism.
Assumption 27: The archetype of God (P = primary religion) is the physiological power center in the brain of males. Here is the instinctive urge of man to rule. It is a sexual urge that we call primary religion P. P is a physiological archetype.
Assumption 30: The physiological archetype of God (P) is the place in the brain where the accredited power to the alpha male is to be projected. It is the place of the sexual ideal projection. All kinds of power are projected here in the course of time.
Their consistency is that all human power has a sexual component: sadomasochism.
Assumption 32: The dimensionality of power is expressed in the number of gods, which is equal to the number of empathically experienced sexual roles in the conscious. So, the more gods experienced, the more conscious experienced dimensions in the divine space of the physiological archetype of God. Which means that with one God, as in monotheism, there arises a consciously narrower space of gods than in polytheism.
Assumption 69: SM-dyad is the physical one-dimensionality in the space of gods of the archetype of God, the power center of males to come to fulfillment by testosterone. In this case, male heterosexuality is empathically experienced in the conscious and 'other sexual roles' are suppressed in the unconscious. But society can enforce a multi-dimensional projection on culture.
.jpg)
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
If we can find the basic dimension, the main factor governing the human mind, we have got a powerful means to understand and forecast further human behavior. Probably the distinction is monotheism versus polytheism, under the condition of 'gods are sexual roles'.
Likely, a bunch of variables clustering together on the extremes of the monotheism-polytheism factor is the blueprint of the human mind. Likely, since we do not have any data, it is all theorie built from hundreds of assumptions.
We developed human religion from animal sexuality and guess what, it works better than expected. Of course, I am the steering factor myself, without any real data, so I can be responsible for a fake 'basic dimension'. But surprisingly, the about 370 assumptions are in full agreement and they are not changed in retrospect. Of course, new assumptions must fit earlier ones, what restricts expanding the theory in a different direction.
Well, if I was the illigitemate steering factor, the whole blog would have turned into a random mess. But that is not the case, since the theory gets more and more content validity. Anyway, we arrived at a simpeler blueprint of religion than I had thought.
The social sciences are like a barrel with syrup. If one variable is drawn out, the rest is pulled along. Everything is connected to everything, so that the blueprint from the human mind can come down to a global main factor: monotheism versus polytheism.
But the bundle of variables in the blueprint above is still chaotic in its interrelations. The only thing we know is they likely belong together. Better to say they all are aspects of the same basic dimension. For example 'sadism' is a male trait that occurs while torturing women. It only happens structurally in monotheism (SM-dyad), where male heterosexuality is in charge and determines the first God. This kind of sadism does not show any empathy with women.
If the human mind is governed by a simple sexual structure, we can predict what everybody already is expecting: the Muslim war in Europe:
Former Christian policor females who are in charge in politics crave to SM-dyad, but do not realize:
Also, civil war in the States easily follows mass immigration from Latin Americans:
Or North Americans against South Americans:
Another possibility is Republicans against Democrats.
Religious wars were sexual wars in which sadomasochism as the basic dimension of sexuality had a prominent place. But all conflicts about power are ultimately based on sexuality. The sexual domain in the male's head is the center of power and might.
The final basic dimension is monotheism versus polytheism
It is kind of shocking that the basic dimension of the human mind always gets a deeper ground. Ultimately only one dimension seems decisive for mankind. And that is the difference between monotheism and polytheism, if applied to the number of sexual roles allowed in a culture:
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles.
4: Fourth God: pedophilia.
5: Fifth God: bestiality.
For example, the difference between white male supremacy and LGBT of today is comparable with the conflict around 'earthly reincarnation' between male heterosexuality and 'other sexual roles' from Homo erectus two million years ago.
The key to human religion is males choosing for their own well being or for equality of females:
This is in accordance with the Sexual Model of Religion:
And the derivation of human religion from animal religion:
ADDENDUM
Assumption 4: The physiological archetype of God led to the sense of God. The feeling that something has to be. But also on the desire to be a God on oneself and to exercise sexual power oneself. Because otherwise such a projection does not make sense.
Assumption 6: All human power has a sexual component: sadomasochism.
Assumption 27: The archetype of God (P = primary religion) is the physiological power center in the brain of males. Here is the instinctive urge of man to rule. It is a sexual urge that we call primary religion P. P is a physiological archetype.
Assumption 30: The physiological archetype of God (P) is the place in the brain where the accredited power to the alpha male is to be projected. It is the place of the sexual ideal projection. All kinds of power are projected here in the course of time.
Their consistency is that all human power has a sexual component: sadomasochism.
Assumption 32: The dimensionality of power is expressed in the number of gods, which is equal to the number of empathically experienced sexual roles in the conscious. So, the more gods experienced, the more conscious experienced dimensions in the divine space of the physiological archetype of God. Which means that with one God, as in monotheism, there arises a consciously narrower space of gods than in polytheism.
Assumption 69: SM-dyad is the physical one-dimensionality in the space of gods of the archetype of God, the power center of males to come to fulfillment by testosterone. In this case, male heterosexuality is empathically experienced in the conscious and 'other sexual roles' are suppressed in the unconscious. But society can enforce a multi-dimensional projection on culture.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment