Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Hormones cause the different brains of males and females. They also create our sexuality from which religion is the eternity derivative. Then religion must be created by hormones too:
Religion is defined as a means of controlling sexual culture. Like the police steers the speed of cars, directs religion sexual behavior.
So, sexuality and religion are influenced by hormones. We see sadomasochism as the principal sexual dimension of the human race. Hence, in Islam we have sadistic males and masochistic females:
But religious populations are also created by natural selection. Through seven million years of inbreeding the Muslim population differs genetically from exogamous Western outbred populations. Thus hormones and natural selection influence religious beliefs.
This means if I know you are a woman from the Muslim population, then I have a good prediction about your faith. And you likely inherited a masochistic personality too. But if you are a man you are expected to be more sadistic on the basis of your faith. Since Muslims have SM-dyad as relationship model between husband and wife.
And if you are a woman from an exogamous Christian population, you are also expected to have strong masochistic feelings. And my point is that Christian males also have a masochistic attitude. So, Christian males might have inherited masochistic feminine traits too. This in spite of their questionable male hormones.
Masochistic traits from both sexes forced Western society into the boring Vanilla-dyad relationship between husband and wife: Soft sex in the name of love.
Traits which are responsible for the lethargic attitude of Christian males while their daughters are being raped and slaughtered in Sweden. Traits by which disgusting Christian males surrender to Muslims as were they females.
Thus, sexuality, natural selection and heredity determine the faith of human beings. Of course these traits are confounded. Then, measured over whole populations there is not much room for personal choice. And that's right since offspring often have the same faith as their parents.
We might wonder if religion can cause a split of the human race into subspecies. Disintegration because religion leads to different types of brains.
Assumption 361: In the evolution different religions caused different brains.
Now we conclude beforehand that such a split into subspecies nowadays is fairly impossible. Earlier in the evolution two types of Homo sapiens simply would split up and disappear beyond the horizon. But in our times policor and anti-policor brains must interact in a complex society. And that means in the near future there will be civil war where they face each other.
But think about it. Can policor split Homo sapiens? Only if policor and anti-policor are loading on some underlying principal factor. Policor is a combination of traits and the question is what underlying factor can split society:
But long before the start of civil war we will see parallel societies in which accidental intruders from the other side are mistreated. This we see already in Muslim no-go areas in Sweden and Belgium and on the campuses of American universities.
Notice, Muslim terror is on the sadistic pole and Democratic terror on the masochistic pole. But there is a twist in the masochistic philosophy, which we will address below.
Thus, different religions cause different brains and likely will cause civil war. In ancient times these sexual encounters were called "religious wars" to capture and rape each others females.
Splitting up the human race
People have long thought that the evolution of the Hominins is to be observed mainly from their bones, their skeletons and recently also from their DNA. Never it came up that some day Homo sapiens itself would split up by brain divergence. And just that seems to happen at this very moment in time unnoticed and beyond our awareness.
We think conceptual differences are normal and healthy for the developing human brain. But in nature, physical contradictions lead to splitting up species into subspecies. And the brain is a physical organ too. That's why we must be cautious with conceptual contradictions. But we also must not throw away the right to free expression as laid down in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.
If these contradictions form a sphere of variables from the origin, no distinct groups from adversaries will be formed. Problems arise when two antagonistic bundles project on the extremes of some underlying and powerful dimension. Then they can easily enforce the split of the human race, possibly after a number of civil wars:
Sadomasochism
On this site the postulated main factor is well known as sadomasochism, the principal factor of human sexuality:
Assumption 6: The SM-dyad is the building block of the relationship between husband and wife. Sadomasochism is the interaction between the killer instinct, the sexual instinct and a touch of cannibalism.
Also animals can exhibit sadistic behavior, but to intertwine sexual lust with murder lust one must project empathy into the sexual partner. And that is mainly a human quality.
Assumption 71: Sadomasochistic behavior occurs also in animals, but for sadomasochistic mental experience empathy is needed, an outstanding human achievement.
Remember, sadomasochistic behavior without empathy easily leads to psychopathy.
In this era Homo sapiens is splitting up into different subspecies based on diverging brains. Below the psychopathic version of Islam:
The human race will split up into SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad
The start of the brain divergence in the human race can be pinpointed rather exactly at the onset of Islam. Together with Christianity both religions are the extremes of the sadomasochistic dimension spanned by Judaism:
But notice the following:
Assumption 360: Judaism was not completely monotheistic, for it appears in ancient times Yahwey had a wife, the fertility Goddess Asherah. It means, only Islam is a pure monotheistic religion and Judaism accepted the compromise of Abraham in which earthly idols were admitted if God in Heaven was the primus inter pares.
Although:
8 Thou shalt not make thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the waters beneath the earth:
9 Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me,
It is quite simple, monotheism (Islam) is solely based on male heterosexuality as the first God of the Alpha male model:
But in Islam 'other sexual roles' are neglected and oppressed, if not worse:
Monotheism is male self centered and not empathic to other sexual roles, to other gods. Islam is monotheistic, Christianity is semi-polytheistic:
Polytheism is based on mutual respect and empathy with all sexual roles.
Christianity has been derived from the polytheistic model, but Christianity has suffered substitution of sexual roles. The first and second sexual role were exchanged:
The reason is in semi-Christianity at least two sexual roles (God and Jesus) are in the conscious. This is quite understandable, since the religion is called 'Christianity' and not for nothing. The role of Jesus has supplanted God. By contrast Islam has only one sexual role (Allah) and nothing to interchange with. Humans cannot be divine in Islam, in monotheism:
This means that in Christianity - with the emerge of women's suffrage in the twentieth century - feminine roles e.g. female sexual roles and masochistic Christian males were overrepresented in politics compared to male heterosexuality, whereby the scales of Western society tipped to masochism, to Marxism, to socialism, to multicuturalism, to whatever nihilistic ideology and this diminished the selfesteem women can have.
Masculine monotheism from Islam leads to SM-dyad and feminine semi-polytheism from Western society to Vanilla-dyad:
We must also understand why socialism is utterly inconsequent. Why liberalism in the States, the Democrats, proclaims GLBT (respecting other sexual roles) but in the rebound becomes utterly repressive against white male heterosexuality, and yet promotes male heterosexual preditors in their fake fantasy world of Holywood sadomasochism. There is a terrible twist in socialist, Marxist thinking, which has been explained in extenso elsewhere on this site.
We must also explain why former Christian females show their masochistic ass up attitude just to sadistic Islam:
Assumption 321: Chrislam is an impossible match for Islam, which will lose its inbreeding instinct by mingling with non-Muslims. Muslims don't recognize this instinct as their overall-identity. Also, horny policor females in Western society are unaware of sexual motives while yearning for sadomasochistic strangulation. Both parties jump blindfolded into a vortex of lust, splitting Western culture into parallel societies after civil war.
Democrats became the most extreme advocates of sadomasochism while they just preach vanilla-sex, how come?
Forced tongue kissing and such innocuous was dismissed with years of prison for rape. Then take just a sex doll. In a radical change of direction SM-dyad was exchanged for Vanilla-dyad.
It was the period of the forced fore- and after play proclaimed by the NVSH (Dutch Society for Sexual Reform) where at the same time the eight-year-old daughter learned her first lessons in the parental bed.
And then afterwards, not to forget the insipid cuddling with that worthless sherry. Many marriages were on the rocks with divorces on the assembly line. Males went on like beasts. At the office, that is.
But later, females were not charmed of the Vanilla-dyad anymore because it is not natural. And for males having to ask for sex on fixed times is an aggravation of already obliged shopping. Also women missed to be pounced in a daze: Hop, the kids outside and then presto, I cook meanwhile by.
Then her eye fell on 'black hair sprayed from all its orifices' and he did exactly what Christian males also wanted but were not allowed anymore. He embodied the SM-dyad at its best, jummy, assaulting and raping the screaming and yelling females. Drool ran from her mouth.
Our dilemma is, Islam is intrinsically right. The first bipedal Hominids invented the sadomasochistic lifestyle, which perpetuated in five million years of evolution. And that means sadomasochism is inherited by Homo sapiens from Australopithecus.
Assumption 67:
- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind until the farthest stars.
- SM-dyad is based on absolute power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.
- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.
- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad will always restore the primal relation between male and female.
So, SM-dyad is not that bad if females are treated respectfully.
But the Islamic form of SM is sick, insane and psychopathic. The Western form of SM in BDSM-role-playing relieves the sexual instinct, if needed, sufficiently. And in porn females have the right to stop the play at any moment. But not in Hollywood, by the way.
How the human race is splitting up
In this era we see two opposing types of people. The qualifications are up for grabs. Only it is difficult to discover any line in all these contradictions. What we do know is a principal caesura in the human race will eventually lead to civil war:
ADDENDUM
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Hormones cause the different brains of males and females. They also create our sexuality from which religion is the eternity derivative. Then religion must be created by hormones too:
Religion is defined as a means of controlling sexual culture. Like the police steers the speed of cars, directs religion sexual behavior.
So, sexuality and religion are influenced by hormones. We see sadomasochism as the principal sexual dimension of the human race. Hence, in Islam we have sadistic males and masochistic females:
But religious populations are also created by natural selection. Through seven million years of inbreeding the Muslim population differs genetically from exogamous Western outbred populations. Thus hormones and natural selection influence religious beliefs.
This means if I know you are a woman from the Muslim population, then I have a good prediction about your faith. And you likely inherited a masochistic personality too. But if you are a man you are expected to be more sadistic on the basis of your faith. Since Muslims have SM-dyad as relationship model between husband and wife.
And if you are a woman from an exogamous Christian population, you are also expected to have strong masochistic feelings. And my point is that Christian males also have a masochistic attitude. So, Christian males might have inherited masochistic feminine traits too. This in spite of their questionable male hormones.
Masochistic traits from both sexes forced Western society into the boring Vanilla-dyad relationship between husband and wife: Soft sex in the name of love.
Traits which are responsible for the lethargic attitude of Christian males while their daughters are being raped and slaughtered in Sweden. Traits by which disgusting Christian males surrender to Muslims as were they females.
Thus, sexuality, natural selection and heredity determine the faith of human beings. Of course these traits are confounded. Then, measured over whole populations there is not much room for personal choice. And that's right since offspring often have the same faith as their parents.
We might wonder if religion can cause a split of the human race into subspecies. Disintegration because religion leads to different types of brains.
Assumption 361: In the evolution different religions caused different brains.
Now we conclude beforehand that such a split into subspecies nowadays is fairly impossible. Earlier in the evolution two types of Homo sapiens simply would split up and disappear beyond the horizon. But in our times policor and anti-policor brains must interact in a complex society. And that means in the near future there will be civil war where they face each other.
But think about it. Can policor split Homo sapiens? Only if policor and anti-policor are loading on some underlying principal factor. Policor is a combination of traits and the question is what underlying factor can split society:
Notice, Muslim terror is on the sadistic pole and Democratic terror on the masochistic pole. But there is a twist in the masochistic philosophy, which we will address below.
Thus, different religions cause different brains and likely will cause civil war. In ancient times these sexual encounters were called "religious wars" to capture and rape each others females.
Splitting up the human race
People have long thought that the evolution of the Hominins is to be observed mainly from their bones, their skeletons and recently also from their DNA. Never it came up that some day Homo sapiens itself would split up by brain divergence. And just that seems to happen at this very moment in time unnoticed and beyond our awareness.
We think conceptual differences are normal and healthy for the developing human brain. But in nature, physical contradictions lead to splitting up species into subspecies. And the brain is a physical organ too. That's why we must be cautious with conceptual contradictions. But we also must not throw away the right to free expression as laid down in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.
If these contradictions form a sphere of variables from the origin, no distinct groups from adversaries will be formed. Problems arise when two antagonistic bundles project on the extremes of some underlying and powerful dimension. Then they can easily enforce the split of the human race, possibly after a number of civil wars:
Sadomasochism
On this site the postulated main factor is well known as sadomasochism, the principal factor of human sexuality:
Assumption 6: The SM-dyad is the building block of the relationship between husband and wife. Sadomasochism is the interaction between the killer instinct, the sexual instinct and a touch of cannibalism.
Also animals can exhibit sadistic behavior, but to intertwine sexual lust with murder lust one must project empathy into the sexual partner. And that is mainly a human quality.
Assumption 71: Sadomasochistic behavior occurs also in animals, but for sadomasochistic mental experience empathy is needed, an outstanding human achievement.
Remember, sadomasochistic behavior without empathy easily leads to psychopathy.
In this era Homo sapiens is splitting up into different subspecies based on diverging brains. Below the psychopathic version of Islam:
Assumption 95: Only a super instinct based on sadomasochism, as the synthesis from killer instinct and sexual instinct, working out in the concrete form of the inbreeding instinct, is strong enough to explain the relentless bloodlust and sexual disruption of Islamic culture. This process is described with the Sexual Balance of Religion, in which SM-dyad decomposes again into bloodlust and sexual desire. The inbreeding instinct is the thread through the evolution of human religion.
Human sexual behavior without empathy easily leads to psychopathy:
Human sexual behavior without empathy easily leads to psychopathy:
Then, 'subspecies' from Homo sapiens will still interbreed but hybrids will not be welcomed in either camp any longer. Intermediate standpoints will not be tolerated anymore. Eve will be expelled to the camp of the Serpent:
The human race will split up into SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad
The start of the brain divergence in the human race can be pinpointed rather exactly at the onset of Islam. Together with Christianity both religions are the extremes of the sadomasochistic dimension spanned by Judaism:
But notice the following:
Assumption 360: Judaism was not completely monotheistic, for it appears in ancient times Yahwey had a wife, the fertility Goddess Asherah. It means, only Islam is a pure monotheistic religion and Judaism accepted the compromise of Abraham in which earthly idols were admitted if God in Heaven was the primus inter pares.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIweWqsmjZE (1:18:12/2:56:49)
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Deuteronomy-Chapter-5/Although:
6 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
7 Thou shalt have none other gods before me.8 Thou shalt not make thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the waters beneath the earth:
9 Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me,
It is quite simple, monotheism (Islam) is solely based on male heterosexuality as the first God of the Alpha male model:
But in Islam 'other sexual roles' are neglected and oppressed, if not worse:
Monotheism is male self centered and not empathic to other sexual roles, to other gods. Islam is monotheistic, Christianity is semi-polytheistic:
Polytheism is based on mutual respect and empathy with all sexual roles.
Christianity has been derived from the polytheistic model, but Christianity has suffered substitution of sexual roles. The first and second sexual role were exchanged:
The reason is in semi-Christianity at least two sexual roles (God and Jesus) are in the conscious. This is quite understandable, since the religion is called 'Christianity' and not for nothing. The role of Jesus has supplanted God. By contrast Islam has only one sexual role (Allah) and nothing to interchange with. Humans cannot be divine in Islam, in monotheism:
This means that in Christianity - with the emerge of women's suffrage in the twentieth century - feminine roles e.g. female sexual roles and masochistic Christian males were overrepresented in politics compared to male heterosexuality, whereby the scales of Western society tipped to masochism, to Marxism, to socialism, to multicuturalism, to whatever nihilistic ideology and this diminished the selfesteem women can have.
Masculine monotheism from Islam leads to SM-dyad and feminine semi-polytheism from Western society to Vanilla-dyad:
In sadomasochism we found a solid primal dimension from which the genetic split of Homo sapiens on brain divergence can be understood. Now we must apprehend why vanilla-sex is not the right answer to the sexual problems of Western society.
We must also understand why socialism is utterly inconsequent. Why liberalism in the States, the Democrats, proclaims GLBT (respecting other sexual roles) but in the rebound becomes utterly repressive against white male heterosexuality, and yet promotes male heterosexual preditors in their fake fantasy world of Holywood sadomasochism. There is a terrible twist in socialist, Marxist thinking, which has been explained in extenso elsewhere on this site.
We must also explain why former Christian females show their masochistic ass up attitude just to sadistic Islam:
Assumption 321: Chrislam is an impossible match for Islam, which will lose its inbreeding instinct by mingling with non-Muslims. Muslims don't recognize this instinct as their overall-identity. Also, horny policor females in Western society are unaware of sexual motives while yearning for sadomasochistic strangulation. Both parties jump blindfolded into a vortex of lust, splitting Western culture into parallel societies after civil war.
Democrats became the most extreme advocates of sadomasochism while they just preach vanilla-sex, how come?
POLICOR, NEXT RELIGION FOR WOMEN
In 1991 rape was abolished within marriage in the Netherlands. A bill for artificial insemination waited for application. It was the blow for the SM-dyad. Latent lesbian feminists had won. The homosexual clergy was already banned in the sixties. Since, lesbian feminists simply did not grasp how it worked. And by the anti-conception pill women were equal to men. Acquired women's suffrage supplemented with a proportion of masochistic Christian males gave them the majority in parliament and so Western culture went down into a free fall.
Forced tongue kissing and such innocuous was dismissed with years of prison for rape. Then take just a sex doll. In a radical change of direction SM-dyad was exchanged for Vanilla-dyad.
It was the period of the forced fore- and after play proclaimed by the NVSH (Dutch Society for Sexual Reform) where at the same time the eight-year-old daughter learned her first lessons in the parental bed.
And then afterwards, not to forget the insipid cuddling with that worthless sherry. Many marriages were on the rocks with divorces on the assembly line. Males went on like beasts. At the office, that is.
But later, females were not charmed of the Vanilla-dyad anymore because it is not natural. And for males having to ask for sex on fixed times is an aggravation of already obliged shopping. Also women missed to be pounced in a daze: Hop, the kids outside and then presto, I cook meanwhile by.
For yeah, also half a lesbian feminist wants sometimes be fucked hard into her ass and so it was that Western women unconsciously started looking for a more solid meal than that slouch bite there on the bench.
Then her eye fell on 'black hair sprayed from all its orifices' and he did exactly what Christian males also wanted but were not allowed anymore. He embodied the SM-dyad at its best, jummy, assaulting and raping the screaming and yelling females. Drool ran from her mouth.
Assumption 212: Islam and Christianity are the endogamous core and exogamous mantle of Homininae groups. Together they form the sadomasochistic dimension, renamed as monotheism in religion. As in a big bang, they drifted apart and in a big crunch, they will destroy each other. By divine judgment of Sexual Scales of Religion, sadomasochism will dissolve in murder lust and sexual desire.
What is our dilemma?
Assumption 67:
- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind until the farthest stars.
- SM-dyad is based on absolute power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.
- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.
- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad will always restore the primal relation between male and female.
So, SM-dyad is not that bad if females are treated respectfully.
How the human race is splitting up
In this era we see two opposing types of people. The qualifications are up for grabs. Only it is difficult to discover any line in all these contradictions. What we do know is a principal caesura in the human race will eventually lead to civil war:
Christianity has been embraced by proud polytheistic Western peoples
In the evolution exogamous peoples embraced polytheistic religions. But Western peoples embraced Christianity too:
1) because of its respect for 'other sexual roles', except bestiality.
2) because of the rejection of inbreeding and incest.
3) but most importantly, because of the promise of life after death in heaven of the parallel universe.
Because inbreeding as base for Christianity was rejected, the Romans had to develop the completely new religious formula of 'guilt and penance'. In fact they developed the 'masochistic philosophy' out of Jesus' submissive behavior.
The greatest difference between polytheism and monotheism in relation to the gods is that in polytheism proud males were competing with the gods for females. They competed with Pan to fertilize all females, just like in the Alpha male model.
But in monotheism a sad picture arises from submissive males creeping for God with butt up.
In the evolution exogamous peoples embraced polytheistic religions. But Western peoples embraced Christianity too:
1) because of its respect for 'other sexual roles', except bestiality.
2) because of the rejection of inbreeding and incest.
3) but most importantly, because of the promise of life after death in heaven of the parallel universe.
Because inbreeding as base for Christianity was rejected, the Romans had to develop the completely new religious formula of 'guilt and penance'. In fact they developed the 'masochistic philosophy' out of Jesus' submissive behavior.
But in monotheism a sad picture arises from submissive males creeping for God with butt up.
Jesus and his "Father"
Jesus was in his thirties and apparently had an abnormal relationship with his "father". It is weird for a grown man to glorify his relationship to a fictitious father. Jesus has his personality split on the sadomasochistic dimension, on which he chose for the masochistic role. It was a pure split personality role play. But beyond that Jesus was a wise man and the polytheistic breakthrough back to humanity. A man who is highly estimated and admired.
The Christian God was no sadist but definitely Jesus was a masochist. Then the main difference with Allah is the God of Christianity can be trusted under all circumstances, without threat or hatred. Without sadism.
Christians identify with Jesus in a masochistic way. And Muslims identify with Allah as in sadistic roleplay:
But if Christianity really was pure masochistic, Western peoples could not be tightened together as mammal groups. And this created space for the Christian Church, which fulfilled the sadistic role in the core:
In fact the Christian church tried to take over the role of Jesus who had supplanted God. And believers saw Jesus as a feminized masochist. Not that this was historically correct, but that is the role in which he was identified as guard of 'other sexual roles'.
Well, then the Christian church got the lumineus idea to replace Jesus in the endogamous core with the homosexual clergy. So, feminin sexual roles remained in the endogamous core but now as homosexual clergy and Jesus was driven out to the mantle with his 'other sexual roles':
So Jesus had supplanted God but in the second instance the homosexual clergy supplanted Jesus.
Jesus was in his thirties and apparently had an abnormal relationship with his "father". It is weird for a grown man to glorify his relationship to a fictitious father. Jesus has his personality split on the sadomasochistic dimension, on which he chose for the masochistic role. It was a pure split personality role play. But beyond that Jesus was a wise man and the polytheistic breakthrough back to humanity. A man who is highly estimated and admired.
The Christian God was no sadist but definitely Jesus was a masochist. Then the main difference with Allah is the God of Christianity can be trusted under all circumstances, without threat or hatred. Without sadism.
Christians identify with Jesus in a masochistic way. And Muslims identify with Allah as in sadistic roleplay:
But if Christianity really was pure masochistic, Western peoples could not be tightened together as mammal groups. And this created space for the Christian Church, which fulfilled the sadistic role in the core:
In fact the Christian church tried to take over the role of Jesus who had supplanted God. And believers saw Jesus as a feminized masochist. Not that this was historically correct, but that is the role in which he was identified as guard of 'other sexual roles'.
Well, then the Christian church got the lumineus idea to replace Jesus in the endogamous core with the homosexual clergy. So, feminin sexual roles remained in the endogamous core but now as homosexual clergy and Jesus was driven out to the mantle with his 'other sexual roles':
So Jesus had supplanted God but in the second instance the homosexual clergy supplanted Jesus.
- Without sin, without masochism there can be no Christianity. For, without sin Jesus has no role. So, a sinful person is a perfect Christian.
- And can there be a bigger sinner than a masochistic homosexual, who threatens the primacy of the heterosexual God?
- That constituted the fundamental privilege of the homosexual clergy in Christianity: they were the optimal sinners.
But did the Christian Church like homosexuals? Did they embrace 'other sexual roles' like Jesus did? Well, it is true in Christianity homosexuals were not thrown headfirst from the building as in Islam, but do not forget in the Netherlands the Catholic clergy still cut off the balls of homosexual boys in the fifties of last century. Why is that if they themselves were gay too?
The homosexual clergy was the ultimate sinner and saw it as its task to persecute homosexuals outside the walls of the church as kind of penance. That is why there are two types of homosexuals. Those who recognize their sin and those who are not aware of sin living in the exogamous mantle. They are stuck in the subconscious:
And because the clergy were sinners already, they meanwhile took their chance to rape young boys where possible.
The Christian Church never saw Christianity as polytheistic but as monotheistic. Therefore, homosexuality is the greatest sin, also in Christianity. This, although they have a lot of gods: God, Jesus as his Son, Mary and a lot of holy others. So, homosexuality is a sin inherited from monotheism.
But then, why is the homosexual clergy leading the Church. As said earlier, that is because they are model sinners in Christianity. Without the existence of 'sin' Christianity has no meaning. Without the 'passion of Christ' this religion cannot exist.
Summarizing:
- Changing the order of sexual roles is only possible in (semi-)polytheism with more sexual roles in the conscious. We know, in monotheism of Islam there is no role for homosexuals in the conscious. This because in Islam there is only one heterosexual God: Allah. And now we understand the gay-problematic in Islam. They have no conscious role for homosexuals without declaring Allah obsolete...
Female homosexuality
Never ever the homosexual clergy realized the odds of a takeover by lesbianism, but just that did happen, not in church but in society. And of course, why not? Since Christianity lost its authoritarian endogamous heart through the Enlightenment:
The Enlightenment was not able to formulate ethical rules to discriminate between cultures. Then, Romanticism got the chance to declare all cultures equal and equivalent. Thereafter, Marxist relativism nihiliated Western culture and abandoned Christianity. Then, women's suffrage distorted the voters landscape and with the help of former Christian masochistic males they came in charge in Western society.
Christianity went on to 'liberalism', a masochistic religion without a God (policor). In liberalism, e.g. the Democrats in the USA, ethical norms imposed on the population are contrary to their own behavior. Anyway, cutting corners, masochistic latent lesbians were not satisfied with Vanilla-dyad anymore and secretly opted for Muslim SM-dyad.
Since long-time Western exogamous culture is determined by 'other sexual roles', which implies female roles. But originally masochism was not implied. Masochism was brought in by Christianity. But now it fits as well in Christianity as in monotheism of Islam:
Anyway this is discussed many times elsewhere on this site and we conclude Christians are masochistic, Western peoples have become masochistic in 2000 years.
But Western women never were attracted to the homosexual clergy and with the upcoming Marxist relativism they got their chance to take over Western society. And so it happened. But without a functioning endogamous core mammal groups fall apart into individualism. What also happened to the Western world. Then, latent lesbian rulers of the Western world were looking for a new authoritarian and sadistic core, which they found in Islam:
The transition of sexual roles
First, a masculine female trend developed in which females copied male sexual behavior. It is an underlying condition for the later takeover by latent lesbian feminists:
Then, lesbian feminists took over society without knowing they constituted a new and trendsetting sexual role (Vanilla dyad) which would misforme society by women's suffrage. But in our model, they supplanted the homosexual clergy by new lesbian rulers who became the new God of Western society:
But now this mammal group lost its endogamous core. Western society has become identical and exogamous in mantle and core.
No sexual bounderies are left and sexual mingling is propagated with any people in the world. There are no cultural bounderies left too. All cultures are equal and equivalent, because the Enlightenment had failed to give ethical rules to discriminate between cultures:
Nowadays totally insane and immoral Western society is based on this ethical flaw on which also the European Union is based:
Christianity has transformed society into matriarchy. See the bonobos:
Summarizing:
A mixed exogamous/endogamous culture is always based on tension between the exogamous mantle and the endogamous core. This is the Alpha male model:
This is natural law for mammal GROUPS as a modus vivendi:
Changing this model by deletion of the endogamous core will cause endogamies to fall apart into complete individualism.
This is quite normal in nature, because mammal groups are only temporary manifestations of the more fundamental law:
And mammal groups have always to form this compromise:
Left or right:
If this basic law is neglected but individuals still want to form a group, they will look for a new authoritarian sadistic endogamous core. And that is the reason for the Muslim immigration in fading Christianity:
Western society is a fading Christian flower in which the exogamous mantle has captured the endogamous core.
The endogamous core can be compared to the male kin bonded lineage from primate groups. These groups stay together in the male line and exchange juvenile females from the mantle with other groups:
What happens in Western culture is the Christian Church, the core of Christianity has disappeared as if the male kin bonded lineage has gone and now there is no reason left to keep the group of Christians together. But because individuals are tied together by numerous bonds, groups must stay together though the authoritarian Christian Church has been driven out of the core.
This means the primal law of nature cannot do its job since it is compromised by the group which does not fall apart. Then, there is only one solution and that is to look for another endogamous core, for the SM-dyad from Islam:
- And can there be a bigger sinner than a masochistic homosexual, who threatens the primacy of the heterosexual God?
- That constituted the fundamental privilege of the homosexual clergy in Christianity: they were the optimal sinners.
But did the Christian Church like homosexuals? Did they embrace 'other sexual roles' like Jesus did? Well, it is true in Christianity homosexuals were not thrown headfirst from the building as in Islam, but do not forget in the Netherlands the Catholic clergy still cut off the balls of homosexual boys in the fifties of last century. Why is that if they themselves were gay too?
The homosexual clergy was the ultimate sinner and saw it as its task to persecute homosexuals outside the walls of the church as kind of penance. That is why there are two types of homosexuals. Those who recognize their sin and those who are not aware of sin living in the exogamous mantle. They are stuck in the subconscious:
And because the clergy were sinners already, they meanwhile took their chance to rape young boys where possible.
The Christian Church never saw Christianity as polytheistic but as monotheistic. Therefore, homosexuality is the greatest sin, also in Christianity. This, although they have a lot of gods: God, Jesus as his Son, Mary and a lot of holy others. So, homosexuality is a sin inherited from monotheism.
But then, why is the homosexual clergy leading the Church. As said earlier, that is because they are model sinners in Christianity. Without the existence of 'sin' Christianity has no meaning. Without the 'passion of Christ' this religion cannot exist.
Summarizing:
- Changing the order of sexual roles is only possible in (semi-)polytheism with more sexual roles in the conscious. We know, in monotheism of Islam there is no role for homosexuals in the conscious. This because in Islam there is only one heterosexual God: Allah. And now we understand the gay-problematic in Islam. They have no conscious role for homosexuals without declaring Allah obsolete...
- Without sin, without masochism there can be no Christianity. For, without sin Jesus has no role. So, a sinful person is a perfect Christian. That's why the homosexual clergy has such a prominent place in Christianity. Homosexuality is the most extreme sin for it threatens the monotheism of God.
- As real homosexuals the clergy was aroused by the chase on other homosexuals outside the church. It was a real lust for them. They developed a sadomasochistic strategy persecuting them, meanwhile being in a masochistic subordinate relationship to theirsadistic forgiving God. Being a Christian priest must have been a lustful experience.
- As sinners, the priests had to do penance and what would be better than persecuting other homosexuals and cut off their balls as punishment from God.
- As real homosexuals the clergy was aroused by the chase on other homosexuals outside the church. It was a real lust for them. They developed a sadomasochistic strategy persecuting them, meanwhile being in a masochistic subordinate relationship to their
- As sinners, the priests had to do penance and what would be better than persecuting other homosexuals and cut off their balls as punishment from God.
Never ever the homosexual clergy realized the odds of a takeover by lesbianism, but just that did happen, not in church but in society. And of course, why not? Since Christianity lost its authoritarian endogamous heart through the Enlightenment:
The Enlightenment was not able to formulate ethical rules to discriminate between cultures. Then, Romanticism got the chance to declare all cultures equal and equivalent. Thereafter, Marxist relativism nihiliated Western culture and abandoned Christianity. Then, women's suffrage distorted the voters landscape and with the help of former Christian masochistic males they came in charge in Western society.
Christianity went on to 'liberalism', a masochistic religion without a God (policor). In liberalism, e.g. the Democrats in the USA, ethical norms imposed on the population are contrary to their own behavior. Anyway, cutting corners, masochistic latent lesbians were not satisfied with Vanilla-dyad anymore and secretly opted for Muslim SM-dyad.
Since long-time Western exogamous culture is determined by 'other sexual roles', which implies female roles. But originally masochism was not implied. Masochism was brought in by Christianity. But now it fits as well in Christianity as in monotheism of Islam:
Anyway this is discussed many times elsewhere on this site and we conclude Christians are masochistic, Western peoples have become masochistic in 2000 years.
But Western women never were attracted to the homosexual clergy and with the upcoming Marxist relativism they got their chance to take over Western society. And so it happened. But without a functioning endogamous core mammal groups fall apart into individualism. What also happened to the Western world. Then, latent lesbian rulers of the Western world were looking for a new authoritarian and sadistic core, which they found in Islam:
The transition of sexual roles
First, a masculine female trend developed in which females copied male sexual behavior. It is an underlying condition for the later takeover by latent lesbian feminists:
Then, lesbian feminists took over society without knowing they constituted a new and trendsetting sexual role (Vanilla dyad) which would misforme society by women's suffrage. But in our model, they supplanted the homosexual clergy by new lesbian rulers who became the new God of Western society:
But now this mammal group lost its endogamous core. Western society has become identical and exogamous in mantle and core.
No sexual bounderies are left and sexual mingling is propagated with any people in the world. There are no cultural bounderies left too. All cultures are equal and equivalent, because the Enlightenment had failed to give ethical rules to discriminate between cultures:
Nowadays totally insane and immoral Western society is based on this ethical flaw on which also the European Union is based:
Christianity has transformed society into matriarchy. See the bonobos:
Summarizing:
A mixed exogamous/endogamous culture is always based on tension between the exogamous mantle and the endogamous core. This is the Alpha male model:
This is natural law for mammal GROUPS as a modus vivendi:
This is quite normal in nature, because mammal groups are only temporary manifestations of the more fundamental law:
And mammal groups have always to form this compromise:
Left or right:
If this basic law is neglected but individuals still want to form a group, they will look for a new authoritarian sadistic endogamous core. And that is the reason for the Muslim immigration in fading Christianity:
Western society is a fading Christian flower in which the exogamous mantle has captured the endogamous core.
The endogamous core can be compared to the male kin bonded lineage from primate groups. These groups stay together in the male line and exchange juvenile females from the mantle with other groups:
What happens in Western culture is the Christian Church, the core of Christianity has disappeared as if the male kin bonded lineage has gone and now there is no reason left to keep the group of Christians together. But because individuals are tied together by numerous bonds, groups must stay together though the authoritarian Christian Church has been driven out of the core.
This means the primal law of nature cannot do its job since it is compromised by the group which does not fall apart. Then, there is only one solution and that is to look for another endogamous core, for the SM-dyad from Islam:
ADDENDUM
Assumption 66: Sadomasochism is a combination of murder and sexuality. It is unstable and easy flammable. Oppression of victims easily turns into murder, decomposing SM-dyad again into killing and sexual instinct.
As long as one keeps bloodthirstiness and sexual desire as critical mass in focus it goes well. But after losing control over the event, sadomasochism falls apart again in murder and sexual instinct. Then magic is lost. Then it explodes.
The key difference between Islamic culture and Christianity is that Islam cannot hold this critical mass together, time and again is losing control, disintegrating sadomasochism over and over again in murder and sexual desire. It is a circular and perpetual process; it is the basic feature of Islamic culture. Christianity succeeds much better in holding sadomasochism in synthesis. But more likely is that Islam intentionally collapses SM-dyad time and again in the interaction with Paradise culture. It is a willful interaction giving the Islamic killing machine her animal power.
As long as one keeps bloodthirstiness and sexual desire as critical mass in focus it goes well. But after losing control over the event, sadomasochism falls apart again in murder and sexual instinct. Then magic is lost. Then it explodes.
The key difference between Islamic culture and Christianity is that Islam cannot hold this critical mass together, time and again is losing control, disintegrating sadomasochism over and over again in murder and sexual desire. It is a circular and perpetual process; it is the basic feature of Islamic culture. Christianity succeeds much better in holding sadomasochism in synthesis. But more likely is that Islam intentionally collapses SM-dyad time and again in the interaction with Paradise culture. It is a willful interaction giving the Islamic killing machine her animal power.
Assumption 67:
- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind until the farthest stars.
- SM-dyad is based on absolute power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.
- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.
- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad will always restore the primal relation between male and female.
- The temporary primacy of Vanilla dyad is enforced by the intellectual development of women. Without her cooperation with SM, SM-Tetrad disintegrates into a single SM-dyad.
Assumption 68: In humans, the number of gods in the archetype of God is by nature unlimited (polytheism), with SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) of the space of gods. By testosterone (monotheism) this number of god factors is gradually restricted to one dimension, called SM-dyad or Allah construct. With estrogen multi-dimensionality remains unaffected. This means that males tend to monotheism and females to polytheism.
Assumption 69: SM-dyad is the physical one-dimensionality in the space of gods of the archetype of God, the power center of males to come to fulfillment by testosterone. Society can enforce a multi-dimensional projection on culture.
Assumption 70: Vanilla-dyad is the physical multi-dimensionality in the
space of gods of the archetype of God. This is due to projection on a multi-dimensional culture in boys, or development by estrogen in girls.
Assumption 95: Only a super instinct based on sadomasochism, as the synthesis of killer instinct and sexual instinct, working out in the concrete form of the inbreeding instinct, is strong enough to explain the relentless bloodlust and sexual disruption of Islamic culture. This process is described with the Sexual Balance of Religion, in which SM-dyad decomposes again in bloodlust and sexual desire. The inbreeding instinct is the thread through the evolution of human religion.
In Islamic culture it is the sexual embedding of the killer instinct which focus the kill on the sexual partner, mostly the woman. But if the woman is not raped or sexually molested and the kill is an institutional process, what then is the fun for the public? What makes the SM decomposition into murder and sexual lust so fascinating for the crowd?
It is the sight of stoning which is attractive for the Islamic public. Muslims come in large numbers to enjoy the transition state of the struggling victim from life to death. Nobody is really interested in the living subject itself or in its dead human body afterwards. It is the transition process that arouses sexual lust in the public.
So humans are fascinated by the transition state as well as by factually taking part in murder and rape. But remember, there are a lot of unclear interactions after 7 million years of lustful practice.
In concluding: When 'other sexual roles' are slaughtered by Sharia or the Koran it is sexually based sentencing, born from sadomasochism. Breaking sadomasochism into murder and sexual lust is an institutionalized bonus for Muslim males. People are fascinated by the transition process as well as by factual murdering and rape. It is the exercise of supreme power over a struggling living subject into a dead and objectified human body. It is the 'no escape objectivation' of 'other sexual roles', it is the ultimate satisfaction found in the complete humiliation of a human subject, it is the sick crown on human sexuality and the fundamental characteristic of Islamic culture.
- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind until the farthest stars.
- SM-dyad is based on absolute power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.
- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.
- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad will always restore the primal relation between male and female.
- The temporary primacy of Vanilla dyad is enforced by the intellectual development of women. Without her cooperation with SM, SM-Tetrad disintegrates into a single SM-dyad.
Assumption 68: In humans, the number of gods in the archetype of God is by nature unlimited (polytheism), with SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) of the space of gods. By testosterone (monotheism) this number of god factors is gradually restricted to one dimension, called SM-dyad or Allah construct. With estrogen multi-dimensionality remains unaffected. This means that males tend to monotheism and females to polytheism.
Assumption 69: SM-dyad is the physical one-dimensionality in the space of gods of the archetype of God, the power center of males to come to fulfillment by testosterone. Society can enforce a multi-dimensional projection on culture.
Assumption 70: Vanilla-dyad is the physical multi-dimensionality in the
space of gods of the archetype of God. This is due to projection on a multi-dimensional culture in boys, or development by estrogen in girls.
Assumption 95: Only a super instinct based on sadomasochism, as the synthesis of killer instinct and sexual instinct, working out in the concrete form of the inbreeding instinct, is strong enough to explain the relentless bloodlust and sexual disruption of Islamic culture. This process is described with the Sexual Balance of Religion, in which SM-dyad decomposes again in bloodlust and sexual desire. The inbreeding instinct is the thread through the evolution of human religion.
Assumption 260: Breaking sadomasochism in Islam.
Sadomasochism is a temporary super instinct formed from the killer instinct and the sexual instinct. As a Gestalt, sadomasochism is more than its constituent parts. In their interaction killer instinct and sexual instinct may easily intensify SM causing an extremely dangerous cocktail.
SM-dyad is the blueprint of the relationship between husband and wife in Islamic culture. Then, if sexual tension hits over the edge SM will break into murder and sexual lust, leading to the kill of the sexual partner.
For the full experience of lust from breaking sadomasochism, murder and rape must take place together in smooth wave. Then we deal with natural psychopaths. But in Islamic culture Muslim males grow up as cultural psychopaths. This means murder and sexual lust can be split institutionally, as follows:
Sadomasochism is a temporary super instinct formed from the killer instinct and the sexual instinct. As a Gestalt, sadomasochism is more than its constituent parts. In their interaction killer instinct and sexual instinct may easily intensify SM causing an extremely dangerous cocktail.
SM-dyad is the blueprint of the relationship between husband and wife in Islamic culture. Then, if sexual tension hits over the edge SM will break into murder and sexual lust, leading to the kill of the sexual partner.
For the full experience of lust from breaking sadomasochism, murder and rape must take place together in smooth wave. Then we deal with natural psychopaths. But in Islamic culture Muslim males grow up as cultural psychopaths. This means murder and sexual lust can be split institutionally, as follows:
In SM-dyad the deadly victim to be can always be predicted in advance. It is the woman who will be killed, but she is not always sexually molested and raped. We know in Islam victims are mostly 'other sexual roles' : homosexuals, women, children, animals and non-believers. Remember, non-believers are from a different tribe or they do not adhere tribal religion, which is a form of sexual identity.
Though SM decomposes into murder and sexual lust, in Islam we mostly don't see sexual molestation and rape factually. Examples of broken SM-dyads are stoning of 'adulterous' women and honor killings.
In Islamic culture it is the sexual embedding of the killer instinct which focus the kill on the sexual partner, mostly the woman. But if the woman is not raped or sexually molested and the kill is an institutional process, what then is the fun for the public? What makes the SM decomposition into murder and sexual lust so fascinating for the crowd?
It is the sight of stoning which is attractive for the Islamic public. Muslims come in large numbers to enjoy the transition state of the struggling victim from life to death. Nobody is really interested in the living subject itself or in its dead human body afterwards. It is the transition process that arouses sexual lust in the public.
So humans are fascinated by the transition state as well as by factually taking part in murder and rape. But remember, there are a lot of unclear interactions after 7 million years of lustful practice.
In concluding: When 'other sexual roles' are slaughtered by Sharia or the Koran it is sexually based sentencing, born from sadomasochism. Breaking sadomasochism into murder and sexual lust is an institutionalized bonus for Muslim males. People are fascinated by the transition process as well as by factual murdering and rape. It is the exercise of supreme power over a struggling living subject into a dead and objectified human body. It is the 'no escape objectivation' of 'other sexual roles', it is the ultimate satisfaction found in the complete humiliation of a human subject, it is the sick crown on human sexuality and the fundamental characteristic of Islamic culture.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment