.png)
Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Polytheism and monotheism
It is clear that only one God is worshipped in monotheism, while at least two gods are honored in polytheism. But looking into Greek history reveals that 'gods' actually stand for 'sexual roles' what changes the plot considerably. This means monotheism stands for the strongest sexual role, for male heterosexuality. Then we think of Allah from Islam.
Polytheism stands for at least two gods, two sexual roles, for example God and his son Jesus. That we call semi-polytheism. Now remember, God as the Alpha male has the sexual role of male heterosexuality while Jesus covers the rest, other sexual roles. Then both cover the full sexual spectrum, which can actually be called full polytheism, since Jesus stands for all other gods. Indeed, Jesus protected the weak, especially women. Hence, Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality.
Proceeding, the limit of the number of possible gods is the number of individuals with free genderchoice and free sexual role. Then, polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in atheism where the godconcept loses every meaning as common denominator. Hence, in the limit polytheism loses its significance in complete individualism. And you know the difference between Western society and Islam is the group. The Western world evolves to individualism, while the Muslim world is still a closed group.
All this means that polytheism is the deeper sexual ground of Christianity, of Romanticism, of Marxist relativism, socialism or policor (political correctness).
The botomline is policor versus anti-policor is a split in sexual attitude. Also it is a split in human religion. It is the same split as between Christianity and Islam. It is a physiological split in the human brain, causing two kinds of Homo sapiens. But they can not avoid each other and will set up parallel societies before this degenerates into civil war.
Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity and Islam, exogamy and endogamy, outbreeding and inbreeding.
Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.
Polytheism and monotheism
It is clear that only one God is worshipped in monotheism, while at least two gods are honored in polytheism. But looking into Greek history reveals that 'gods' actually stand for 'sexual roles' what changes the plot considerably:
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
Monotheism stands for the strongest sexual role, for male heterosexuality. Then we think of Allah from Islam:
Polytheism stands for at least two gods, two sexual roles, for example God and his son Jesus. This we call semi-polytheism:
Now remember, God is the Alpha male:
God has the sexual role of male heterosexuality while Jesus covers the rest, other sexual roles:
Then both cover the full sexual spectrum, which can actually be called full polytheism, since Jesus stands for all other gods. Hence, Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality:
Indeed, Jesus protected the weak, especially women:
Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality:
Proceeding, the limit of the number of possible gods in polytheism is the number of individuals with a free choice of gender and sexual role.
Assumption 363: The limit of the number of possible gods in polytheism is the number of individuals with a free choice of gender and sexual role.
Then, polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in atheism where the godconcept loses every meaning as common denominator.
Assumption 364: Polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in the individualism of atheism where the god concept loses every meaning as common denominator.
Hence, in the limit polytheism loses its significance in complete individualism. And you know the difference between Western society and Islam is the group. The Western world evolves to individualism, while the Muslim world is still a closed group.
All this means that polytheism is the deeper sexual ground of Christianity, of Romanticism, of Marxist relativism, socialism or policor (political correctness).
And monotheism is the deeper sexual ground of Islam, sadistic male heterosexuality terrorizing other sexual roles:
The botomline is policor versus anti-policor is a split in sexual attitude. Also a split in human religion. It is the same split as between Christianity and Islam. It is a fysiological split in the human brain, causing two kinds of Homo sapiens. But they can not avoid each other and will set up parallel societies before this degenerates into civil war.
Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity and Islam, exogamy and endogamy, outbreeding and inbreeding.
Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.
Polytheism, monotheism and sexual freedom
There is a lot of articles about sexual freedom on this blog. Time and again our conclusion is female sexual freedom is terrorrized by monotheism, and only monotheism is capable of maintaining a horrible inbreeding and incest culture, blackmailing females for seven million years. Males are much stronger than females and should not need 'religion' to oppress their outbreeding instinct. The real reason for monotheism is that females think that immanent Allah can see their adultery and will report to her husband:
'Transcendent deceased gods of the inbreeding era mingled with immanent ancestors from reincarnation. Now, adulterous cousins were inspected internally by immanent gods, who reported for stoning immediately. This combined religion of genetic immortality with reincarnation perfected tribal control on cousins.'
.jpg)
We know there are a lot of female gods in Greek polytheism. We also know there is no divine female sexual role in Islam, which is the prototype of monotheism. This has been shown earlier:
We think about the onset of Homo erectus around 1,8 million years ago, polytheism developed genetic diversity as a healthy reaction to the inbreeding culture of Australopiths. Though it must be said Australopiths and early humans had enormous genetic variation and usually survived their own inbreeding practice:
In the evolution polytheism was no quaranty for full sexual freedom for women, since it interacted with ancient cultures. Thus, let us be clear that we do not base political correctness on traditions from ancient polytheism, but on our own theoretical construct.
We base our theoretical definition of polytheism on:
1: Multiple gods are multiple sexual roles.
2: Polytheism means conscious empathy with all other sexual roles.
Assumption 367: Theoretical definition of polytheism based on:
1: Multiple gods are multiple sexual roles.
2: Polytheism means conscious empathy with all other sexual roles.
And from that timeless definition of polytheism we make predictions about the future of mankind. This is our take on polytheism:
Assumption 365: Polytheism and monotheism.
- In polytheism, multiple sexual roles are seen as multiple gods. In monotheism only one sexual role is acknowledged as God, usually male heterosexuality.
- In polytheism all sexual roles are empathically acknowledged in the conscious. In Islam only male heterosexuality is accepted in the conscious, while 'other sexual roles' are suppressed in the unconscious.
- Respect for female sexual roles leads to equal rights in polytheism, in particular to free partner choice. This means that polytheism promotes genetic diversity for women and exogamy with regard to other ethnicities, races and cultures.
- Polytheism promotes respect for other sexual roles, for example LGBT. On the other hand monotheism does not acknowledge any of these sexual roles.
Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity vs. Islam, exogamy vs. endogamy and outbreeding versus inbreeding.
Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.
We conclude female sexual roles are more respected in polytheism than in monotheism. But as said earlier, it is not to be expected that female sexual roles in ancient times and classical Greek history were about equivalent to male sexual roles. Of course not, but we are talking about a theoretical polytheistic model, which gives women in our time much more sexual freedom than in monotheistic Islam.
So if we upgrade polytheism to modern times, then we expect female sexual roles to be equivalent to male sexual roles. According to our modern polytheistic model women are entitled to choose their own partners.
And indeed, in Western society exogamy prevails and inhabitants can marry regardless of race and culture. This means closure between Marxist relativism, which declared all cultures equal and equivalent and exogamy, which allows people to marry other people all over the world.
So, polytheism leads to exogamy and freedom to merge races and ethnicities all over the world. That is why polytheism is the basic characteristic of socialism, Marxism and faded Christianity:
It is no secret that pedophilia is very popular in the highest socialistic circles.
The policor construct
Policor is the latest form of polytheism in a long row:
Remarkable, people gave polytheism different names in history. Apparently, they did not see the link between gods and sexual roles. For example, Christians think their religion is monotheistic, while they have at least two gods, God and his son Jesus. As said earlier, Christianity covers the whole domain of sexual roles from polytheism. So, Islam is right, Christianity is polytheistic.
Another example is the growing group of supporters who do not believe in God anymore. This development runs from the Enlightenment to atheism. They think they are the proud followers of an idiology, while they only talk about sexual roles, which are gods in our opinion. And every ideology which controlls sexual behavior of others is a religion, so, policor is a religion too.
Okay, policor is a religion, but how? Well, you know religions never talk about the parallel universe but always about sex. The same with policor, it is all about sex. It is about sexual roles, about Sodom and Gomorrah, the endstage of polytheism. They talk about free genderchoice and individual sexual roles, everybody seems to have his personal god, it is the endpoint of poytheism in individualism. They talk about 'other sexual roles', which are called LGBT, inclusive female heterosexual roles. They talk about the sexual merge of races and ethnicities, which is pure exogamy, an important aspect of polytheism. And the irony is that socialism is usually seen as a religion without a God. So people see the connection between socialism and religion, but do not recognize sexual roles from policor as gods.
.jpg)
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
It is clear that only one God is worshipped in monotheism, while at least two gods are honored in polytheism. But looking into Greek history reveals that 'gods' actually stand for 'sexual roles' what changes the plot considerably. This means monotheism stands for the strongest sexual role, for male heterosexuality. Then we think of Allah from Islam.
Polytheism stands for at least two gods, two sexual roles, for example God and his son Jesus. That we call semi-polytheism. Now remember, God as the Alpha male has the sexual role of male heterosexuality while Jesus covers the rest, other sexual roles. Then both cover the full sexual spectrum, which can actually be called full polytheism, since Jesus stands for all other gods. Indeed, Jesus protected the weak, especially women. Hence, Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality.
Proceeding, the limit of the number of possible gods is the number of individuals with free genderchoice and free sexual role. Then, polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in atheism where the godconcept loses every meaning as common denominator. Hence, in the limit polytheism loses its significance in complete individualism. And you know the difference between Western society and Islam is the group. The Western world evolves to individualism, while the Muslim world is still a closed group.
All this means that polytheism is the deeper sexual ground of Christianity, of Romanticism, of Marxist relativism, socialism or policor (political correctness).
The botomline is policor versus anti-policor is a split in sexual attitude. Also it is a split in human religion. It is the same split as between Christianity and Islam. It is a physiological split in the human brain, causing two kinds of Homo sapiens. But they can not avoid each other and will set up parallel societies before this degenerates into civil war.
Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity and Islam, exogamy and endogamy, outbreeding and inbreeding.
Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.
Polytheism and monotheism
It is clear that only one God is worshipped in monotheism, while at least two gods are honored in polytheism. But looking into Greek history reveals that 'gods' actually stand for 'sexual roles' what changes the plot considerably:
 |
| Greek gods |
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles.
4: Fourth God: pedophilia.
5: Fifth God: bestiality.
Monotheism stands for the strongest sexual role, for male heterosexuality. Then we think of Allah from Islam:
Polytheism stands for at least two gods, two sexual roles, for example God and his son Jesus. This we call semi-polytheism:
Now remember, God is the Alpha male:
God has the sexual role of male heterosexuality while Jesus covers the rest, other sexual roles:
Then both cover the full sexual spectrum, which can actually be called full polytheism, since Jesus stands for all other gods. Hence, Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality:
Indeed, Jesus protected the weak, especially women:
John 8
Chapter 8
Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality:
Proceeding, the limit of the number of possible gods in polytheism is the number of individuals with a free choice of gender and sexual role.
Then, polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in atheism where the godconcept loses every meaning as common denominator.
Assumption 364: Polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in the individualism of atheism where the god concept loses every meaning as common denominator.
Hence, in the limit polytheism loses its significance in complete individualism. And you know the difference between Western society and Islam is the group. The Western world evolves to individualism, while the Muslim world is still a closed group.
All this means that polytheism is the deeper sexual ground of Christianity, of Romanticism, of Marxist relativism, socialism or policor (political correctness).
And monotheism is the deeper sexual ground of Islam, sadistic male heterosexuality terrorizing other sexual roles:
The botomline is policor versus anti-policor is a split in sexual attitude. Also a split in human religion. It is the same split as between Christianity and Islam. It is a fysiological split in the human brain, causing two kinds of Homo sapiens. But they can not avoid each other and will set up parallel societies before this degenerates into civil war.
Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity and Islam, exogamy and endogamy, outbreeding and inbreeding.
Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.
Polytheism, monotheism and sexual freedom
There is a lot of articles about sexual freedom on this blog. Time and again our conclusion is female sexual freedom is terrorrized by monotheism, and only monotheism is capable of maintaining a horrible inbreeding and incest culture, blackmailing females for seven million years. Males are much stronger than females and should not need 'religion' to oppress their outbreeding instinct. The real reason for monotheism is that females think that immanent Allah can see their adultery and will report to her husband:
'Transcendent deceased gods of the inbreeding era mingled with immanent ancestors from reincarnation. Now, adulterous cousins were inspected internally by immanent gods, who reported for stoning immediately. This combined religion of genetic immortality with reincarnation perfected tribal control on cousins.'
.jpg){kind=spacer}
We know there are a lot of female gods in Greek polytheism. We also know there is no divine female sexual role in Islam, which is the prototype of monotheism. This has been shown earlier:
We think about the onset of Homo erectus around 1,8 million years ago, polytheism developed genetic diversity as a healthy reaction to the inbreeding culture of Australopiths. Though it must be said Australopiths and early humans had enormous genetic variation and usually survived their own inbreeding practice:
In the evolution polytheism was no quaranty for full sexual freedom for women, since it interacted with ancient cultures. Thus, let us be clear that we do not base political correctness on traditions from ancient polytheism, but on our own theoretical construct.
We base our theoretical definition of polytheism on:
1: Multiple gods are multiple sexual roles.
2: Polytheism means conscious empathy with all other sexual roles.
Assumption 367: Theoretical definition of polytheism based on:
1: Multiple gods are multiple sexual roles.
2: Polytheism means conscious empathy with all other sexual roles.
Assumption 365: Polytheism and monotheism.
- In polytheism, multiple sexual roles are seen as multiple gods. In monotheism only one sexual role is acknowledged as God, usually male heterosexuality.
- In polytheism all sexual roles are empathically acknowledged in the conscious. In Islam only male heterosexuality is accepted in the conscious, while 'other sexual roles' are suppressed in the unconscious.
- Respect for female sexual roles leads to equal rights in polytheism, in particular to free partner choice. This means that polytheism promotes genetic diversity for women and exogamy with regard to other ethnicities, races and cultures.
- Polytheism promotes respect for other sexual roles, for example LGBT. On the other hand monotheism does not acknowledge any of these sexual roles.
Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity vs. Islam, exogamy vs. endogamy and outbreeding versus inbreeding.
Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.
We conclude female sexual roles are more respected in polytheism than in monotheism. But as said earlier, it is not to be expected that female sexual roles in ancient times and classical Greek history were about equivalent to male sexual roles. Of course not, but we are talking about a theoretical polytheistic model, which gives women in our time much more sexual freedom than in monotheistic Islam.
So if we upgrade polytheism to modern times, then we expect female sexual roles to be equivalent to male sexual roles. According to our modern polytheistic model women are entitled to choose their own partners.
And indeed, in Western society exogamy prevails and inhabitants can marry regardless of race and culture. This means closure between Marxist relativism, which declared all cultures equal and equivalent and exogamy, which allows people to marry other people all over the world.
So, polytheism leads to exogamy and freedom to merge races and ethnicities all over the world. That is why polytheism is the basic characteristic of socialism, Marxism and faded Christianity:
It is no secret that pedophilia is very popular in the highest socialistic circles.
The policor construct
Policor is the latest form of polytheism in a long row:
Remarkable, people gave polytheism different names in history. Apparently, they did not see the link between gods and sexual roles. For example, Christians think their religion is monotheistic, while they have at least two gods, God and his son Jesus. As said earlier, Christianity covers the whole domain of sexual roles from polytheism. So, Islam is right, Christianity is polytheistic.
Another example is the growing group of supporters who do not believe in God anymore. This development runs from the Enlightenment to atheism. They think they are the proud followers of an idiology, while they only talk about sexual roles, which are gods in our opinion. And every ideology which controlls sexual behavior of others is a religion, so, policor is a religion too.
Okay, policor is a religion, but how? Well, you know religions never talk about the parallel universe but always about sex. The same with policor, it is all about sex. It is about sexual roles, about Sodom and Gomorrah, the endstage of polytheism. They talk about free genderchoice and individual sexual roles, everybody seems to have his personal god, it is the endpoint of poytheism in individualism. They talk about 'other sexual roles', which are called LGBT, inclusive female heterosexual roles. They talk about the sexual merge of races and ethnicities, which is pure exogamy, an important aspect of polytheism. And the irony is that socialism is usually seen as a religion without a God. So people see the connection between socialism and religion, but do not recognize sexual roles from policor as gods.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment