Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
The following assumptions are needed to understand this article:
SM-dyad:
SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad:
Assumption 67:
- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind to the farthest stars.
- SM-dyad is based on absolute male power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.
- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.
- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad is the primal relation between male and female.
- The temporary primacy of Vanilla dyad is enforced by the intellectual development of women.
Well, our nephews from Panini don't know SM-dyad, because chimps are not much interested in sex, but bonobos do know Vanilla-dyad:
Assumption 489: Political correctness has Vanilla-dyad with masochism (strong).
Bonobos inherited no masochism. But human outbred populations have SM-dyad (weak) with masochism (weak). Later outbred populations as Christianity have SM-dyad (weak) plus masochism (strong) from Desert Religions with SM-dyad (strong) and masochism (strong). Then for Political Correctness (PC), outbred populations have Vanilla-dyad with masochism (strong), which yearns to Islam sadism (strong), leading to Chrislam and civil war.
Assumption 495: Political Correctness is the follow up religion from Christianity. It does not matter they do not acknowledge a god in their central core. They are a religion anyway. What matters is the number of recognized sexual roles, which can be seen as gods. Then PC has as many gods as there are individuals in LGBT-xyz to gender dysphoria*, meaning Christianity has evolved into atheism (polytheism).
*Gender dysphoria (GD) is the distress a person feels due to a mismatch between their gender identity and their sex assigned at birth. People who experience gender dysphoria are typically transgender.
Assumption 488: SM-dyad (strong) and SM-dyad (weak). [PC = Political Correctness.]
SM-dyad (strong) is found in Homo sapiens non-PC (Islam, inbreeding).
SM-dyad (weak) in Homo sapiens non-PC (Ancient Greeks, Old Christianity (Catholicism), outcrossing). Vanilla-dyad is found in Homo sapiens PC (Political Correctness, outcrossing).
SM-dyad (strong) is used in inbreeding cultures like Islam where females are forced to cousin marriages, while their instinctive drive is outcrossing.
SM-dyad (weak) is found in outcrossing cultures as the ancient Greeks and old Christianity (Catholicism), where females are not oppressed.
Vanilla-dyad is found in outcrossing cultures from Homo sapiens PC (Political Correctness), where males and females are sexually equivalent.
--------------------------------
Group identity
Cultures have group identity. It happens group binding gets lost. Then the group falls apart in individuals with their own identity. We know how this process works and therefore exists a model. This model is in sync with religion. Below we show the model for Western culture:
You would not recognize this as a model, more as a string of history. But the model is underlying the successive phases of this ordering. It is called 'the rise and fall' of an outbreeding culture. The Decline of the West. Der Untergang des Abendlandes from Oswald Spengler. We also see 'religion' is the wrong word for this process. Must be 'breeding', although not immediately clear why:
Only bipedal primates use inbreeding (endogamy) ànd outbreeding (exogamy):
Inbreeding cultures are closed groups which in principle do not mate with other groups. But outcrossing groups have no boundaries and members can marry partners everywhere. This fundamental difference in groups of higher mammals has big consequences:
Outbreeding groups will show a development in which group identity is increasingly diluted. This is called individualism. Individualism means losing group identity in the long run. Outbreeding is to lose the group again and to fall apart in pairwise procreation. That's the situation with Christianity, what's dying as a fading flower.
Falling apart in pairwise procreation is a natural consequence of outbreeding, but the later mixing with Islam to Chrislam is for account of masochism, the poison of Desert Religions injected into North European outcrossing cultures by Christianity. So, Christianity brought a lot of good things, but masochism is the curse of Western society. These are not my words:
Long before Christianity, Europe was populated by proud outcrossing cultures without the curse of masochism, which people only liked the Christian idea of respectful equivalence between individuals (between sexual roles) in the teachings of Jesus. Never could they have imagined that Christianity would lead to their demise:
Inbreeding cultures as Islam need sadism to convince women to cousin marriages, where females instinctively choose for outbreeding. But the reverse is not true, outcrossing cultures need no masochism to exist. Look at the ancient Greeks who competed with Zeus on on a level playing field. But then again look at Desert Religions where males have a masochistic homo-erotic and submissive relationship with their monotheistic God. Masochism is the curse of Desert Religions.
The teachings of Jesus became Vanilla-dyad in the mantle, while the Catholic Church became SM-dyad (weak) in the core, which for 1000 years was a viable equilibrium for mammals living in groups together:
Notice, the Alpha male fertilizes all females, what is inbreeding. But females in the mantle are adulterous to alien males, outbreeding:
Islam was embraced by inbred populations around the Arabian Peninsula, what kept their group identity alive till the present day:
In Islam females are oppressed because they hate inbreeding and instinctively want outcrossing:
Now, it is not accidental that this development parallels 'religion', because religion is group binding. Religion protects group identity.
So, group identity equals religion and this is often reflected in the ethnicity of believers. You can see fairly well who is Christian or Muslim. But of course ethnicity has diluted in history. In Islam today there are 500 million authentic, tribal and ethnic Arab and Asian Muslims and a billion new Muslims of other ethnicity in the new religious mantle:
Until now we have given the deeper ground from the downfall of Western Culture: insane masochism from Christianity. But to understand the cybernetics of this process we must understand the fallacy from Political Correctness, which does not understand not to be another religion. This is because socialists do not recognize a god.
Gods are sexual roles
When gods are seen as sexual roles, religion becomes a lot easier to understand. When sexual roles are honored empathically in the conscious, there is also more respect for the players of those roles. And if one considers them as gods, a multi-divinity towards polytheism develops.
The reverse is true as well, for the more sexual roles are displaced to the unconscious and not understood empathically any longer, the more gods disappear from the conscious and the less consciously they are honored. Ultimately, there remains a single heterosexual male religion about as monotheism:
The myth of Sodom and Gomorrah had the meaning to condemn homosexuality, as a representative of other sexual roles and to keep this god out of the conscious, in order to end up only retaining male heterosexuality as respectfully. Although female sexuality was also needed, this role had no status whatsoever in the conscious.
Gods are sexual roles
Nearly all religious conflicts in the evolution have to do with the acknowledgment of the number of sexual roles as gods.
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality
Males try keeping the male heterosexual God for themselves in monotheism. Females try to get as many other female sexual roles added to the script as polytheism. It is the clash between SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad.
Canada and Sweden
Canada has not sunk yet as far as Sweden, which has already fallen into Chrislam, just before civil war:
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
The following assumptions are needed to understand this article:
SM-dyad:
SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad:
Assumption 67:
- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind to the farthest stars.
- SM-dyad is based on absolute male power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.
- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.
- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad is the primal relation between male and female.
- The temporary primacy of Vanilla dyad is enforced by the intellectual development of women.
Well, our nephews from Panini don't know SM-dyad, because chimps are not much interested in sex, but bonobos do know Vanilla-dyad:
Assumption 489: Political correctness has Vanilla-dyad with masochism (strong).
Bonobos inherited no masochism. But human outbred populations have SM-dyad (weak) with masochism (weak). Later outbred populations as Christianity have SM-dyad (weak) plus masochism (strong) from Desert Religions with SM-dyad (strong) and masochism (strong). Then for Political Correctness (PC), outbred populations have Vanilla-dyad with masochism (strong), which yearns to Islam sadism (strong), leading to Chrislam and civil war.
Assumption 495: Political Correctness is the follow up religion from Christianity. It does not matter they do not acknowledge a god in their central core. They are a religion anyway. What matters is the number of recognized sexual roles, which can be seen as gods. Then PC has as many gods as there are individuals in LGBT-xyz to gender dysphoria*, meaning Christianity has evolved into atheism (polytheism).
*Gender dysphoria (GD) is the distress a person feels due to a mismatch between their gender identity and their sex assigned at birth. People who experience gender dysphoria are typically transgender.
Assumption 488: SM-dyad (strong) and SM-dyad (weak). [PC = Political Correctness.]
SM-dyad (strong) is found in Homo sapiens non-PC (Islam, inbreeding).
SM-dyad (weak) in Homo sapiens non-PC (Ancient Greeks, Old Christianity (Catholicism), outcrossing). Vanilla-dyad is found in Homo sapiens PC (Political Correctness, outcrossing).
SM-dyad (strong) is used in inbreeding cultures like Islam where females are forced to cousin marriages, while their instinctive drive is outcrossing.
SM-dyad (weak) is found in outcrossing cultures as the ancient Greeks and old Christianity (Catholicism), where females are not oppressed.
Vanilla-dyad is found in outcrossing cultures from Homo sapiens PC (Political Correctness), where males and females are sexually equivalent.
--------------------------------
Group identity
Cultures have group identity. It happens group binding gets lost. Then the group falls apart in individuals with their own identity. We know how this process works and therefore exists a model. This model is in sync with religion. Below we show the model for Western culture:
You would not recognize this as a model, more as a string of history. But the model is underlying the successive phases of this ordering. It is called 'the rise and fall' of an outbreeding culture. The Decline of the West. Der Untergang des Abendlandes from Oswald Spengler. We also see 'religion' is the wrong word for this process. Must be 'breeding', although not immediately clear why:
Only bipedal primates use inbreeding (endogamy) ànd outbreeding (exogamy):
Inbreeding cultures are closed groups which in principle do not mate with other groups. But outcrossing groups have no boundaries and members can marry partners everywhere. This fundamental difference in groups of higher mammals has big consequences:
Outbreeding groups will show a development in which group identity is increasingly diluted. This is called individualism. Individualism means losing group identity in the long run. Outbreeding is to lose the group again and to fall apart in pairwise procreation. That's the situation with Christianity, what's dying as a fading flower.
Falling apart in pairwise procreation is a natural consequence of outbreeding, but the later mixing with Islam to Chrislam is for account of masochism, the poison of Desert Religions injected into North European outcrossing cultures by Christianity. So, Christianity brought a lot of good things, but masochism is the curse of Western society. These are not my words:
Long before Christianity, Europe was populated by proud outcrossing cultures without the curse of masochism, which people only liked the Christian idea of respectful equivalence between individuals (between sexual roles) in the teachings of Jesus. Never could they have imagined that Christianity would lead to their demise:
Inbreeding cultures as Islam need sadism to convince women to cousin marriages, where females instinctively choose for outbreeding. But the reverse is not true, outcrossing cultures need no masochism to exist. Look at the ancient Greeks who competed with Zeus on on a level playing field. But then again look at Desert Religions where males have a masochistic homo-erotic and submissive relationship with their monotheistic God. Masochism is the curse of Desert Religions.
The teachings of Jesus became Vanilla-dyad in the mantle, while the Catholic Church became SM-dyad (weak) in the core, which for 1000 years was a viable equilibrium for mammals living in groups together:
Old Christianity was a healthy religion with a sadistic core (Catholic Church) and a masochistic mantle (teachings of Jesus):
Notice, the Alpha male fertilizes all females, what is inbreeding. But females in the mantle are adulterous to alien males, outbreeding:
Islam was embraced by inbred populations around the Arabian Peninsula, what kept their group identity alive till the present day:
In Islam females are oppressed because they hate inbreeding and instinctively want outcrossing:
So, group identity equals religion and this is often reflected in the ethnicity of believers. You can see fairly well who is Christian or Muslim. But of course ethnicity has diluted in history. In Islam today there are 500 million authentic, tribal and ethnic Arab and Asian Muslims and a billion new Muslims of other ethnicity in the new religious mantle:
Until now we have given the deeper ground from the downfall of Western Culture: insane masochism from Christianity. But to understand the cybernetics of this process we must understand the fallacy from Political Correctness, which does not understand not to be another religion. This is because socialists do not recognize a god.
Gods are sexual roles
When gods are seen as sexual roles, religion becomes a lot easier to understand. When sexual roles are honored empathically in the conscious, there is also more respect for the players of those roles. And if one considers them as gods, a multi-divinity towards polytheism develops.
The reverse is true as well, for the more sexual roles are displaced to the unconscious and not understood empathically any longer, the more gods disappear from the conscious and the less consciously they are honored. Ultimately, there remains a single heterosexual male religion about as monotheism:
The myth of Sodom and Gomorrah had the meaning to condemn homosexuality, as a representative of other sexual roles and to keep this god out of the conscious, in order to end up only retaining male heterosexuality as respectfully. Although female sexuality was also needed, this role had no status whatsoever in the conscious.
Gods are sexual roles
Nearly all religious conflicts in the evolution have to do with the acknowledgment of the number of sexual roles as gods.
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality
Males try keeping the male heterosexual God for themselves in monotheism. Females try to get as many other female sexual roles added to the script as polytheism. It is the clash between SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad.
Canada and Sweden
Canada has not sunk yet as far as Sweden, which has already fallen into Chrislam, just before civil war:
Sodom and Canada
On May 17th, 2016, a day recognized by the federal government as “International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia”, an edict emanated forth from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office (PMO) stating that the Liberal government was planning to make additional changes to the “Hate Propaganda” laws (Sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada in order to “protect” the nation’s sexually deviant members.
The unabashed and strident manner in which the federal government is pushing forward with its controversial agenda of planned perversion and subversion of Canadian society (under the guise of supposed “human rights” for sexual aberrants) is an issue fraught with deep and troubling concern, not only those Canadians of the Christian faith who prefer to rely upon the eternal wisdom of God and Nature but also for millions of other citizens whose moral standards won’t permit them to accept the subversive and sinister hidden aim within the government’s mandate to criminalize public dissent and discussion on moral, ethical and health standards affecting the nation as a whole.
In the words of the PM, “To do its part, the Government of Canada today will introduce legislation that will help ensure transgender and other gender-diverse people can live according to their gender identity, free from discrimination, and protected from hate propaganda and hate crimes.”
Analysis of Sodom and Canada
This is the development of Christianity in the Western World in which God is removed from the central core and replaced by Marxist relativism and nihilism:
Thisreligious sexual vacuum in the center will lead to Chrislam, the downfall of Western culture:
So actually there are two forms of Christianity left in the Western world:
1: We have the old sadistic form (SM-dyad(weak)) from before the sixties of the last century, called semi-polytheism, which can still found in Eastern Europe and the Rust Belt of the States (Catholic Church in Western Europe):
2: And we have former Christians (now PC, Vanilla-dyad, polytheism), who think not to be religious any longer, but adhering to the Teachings of Jesus, because they cherish 'other sexual roles':
What we see is the left, the socialists (PC) have integrated 'other sexual roles' into their conscious, while Catholics still reject homosexuality. Political correctness is returned to atheism without a god, which is the same as polytheism with or without a central god (Zeus) and which does not matter. To be precise, if gods are sexual roles, there is no difference between atheism and polytheism:
This all means former Christians (PC) are to find with the Democrats in the US and in Canada (PC).
Canada is still a religious country in which all sexual roles are empathically experienced in the conscious. But now the weird and strange situation happens in which 'other sexual roles' turn against 'male heterosexuality'. Instead of accepting 'all sexual roles' like bonobos did, Canadians reject male sexuality, unless in a strongly feminine form:
(219) America dies with Christianity
(235) Homosexual schizophrenia in Christianity
(236) Scaling Christianity
(266) The fall of Christianity
(281) The Religious Revolution: HR = f(SR)
(286) HR = f(SR), Human Religion, Sexual Religion
(292) Animal genetic immortality still governs human religion
On May 17th, 2016, a day recognized by the federal government as “International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia”, an edict emanated forth from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office (PMO) stating that the Liberal government was planning to make additional changes to the “Hate Propaganda” laws (Sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada in order to “protect” the nation’s sexually deviant members.
The unabashed and strident manner in which the federal government is pushing forward with its controversial agenda of planned perversion and subversion of Canadian society (under the guise of supposed “human rights” for sexual aberrants) is an issue fraught with deep and troubling concern, not only those Canadians of the Christian faith who prefer to rely upon the eternal wisdom of God and Nature but also for millions of other citizens whose moral standards won’t permit them to accept the subversive and sinister hidden aim within the government’s mandate to criminalize public dissent and discussion on moral, ethical and health standards affecting the nation as a whole.
In the words of the PM, “To do its part, the Government of Canada today will introduce legislation that will help ensure transgender and other gender-diverse people can live according to their gender identity, free from discrimination, and protected from hate propaganda and hate crimes.”
Analysis of Sodom and Canada
This is the development of Christianity in the Western World in which God is removed from the central core and replaced by Marxist relativism and nihilism:
This
1: We have the old sadistic form (SM-dyad(weak)) from before the sixties of the last century, called semi-polytheism, which can still found in Eastern Europe and the Rust Belt of the States (Catholic Church in Western Europe):
What we see is the left, the socialists (PC) have integrated 'other sexual roles' into their conscious, while Catholics still reject homosexuality. Political correctness is returned to atheism without a god, which is the same as polytheism with or without a central god (Zeus) and which does not matter. To be precise, if gods are sexual roles, there is no difference between atheism and polytheism:
This all means former Christians (PC) are to find with the Democrats in the US and in Canada (PC).
Canada is still a religious country in which all sexual roles are empathically experienced in the conscious. But now the weird and strange situation happens in which 'other sexual roles' turn against 'male heterosexuality'. Instead of accepting 'all sexual roles' like bonobos did, Canadians reject male sexuality, unless in a strongly feminine form:
Most remarkable is gender dysphoria in which the feeling of one's emotional and psychological identity as male or female can be opposite to one's biological sex. In principle, this leads to as many sexual roles as there are individuals. This is the end stage of Christianity, developed into pure atheism, pure polytheism, in which there is no group identity any longer, in which there are also no common ethical standards left, in which 'liberals' can have changing ethical norms by the day, because Marxist relativism said there are no applicable standards to distinguish between cultures in this world. Infanticide, you name it, there are no moral boundaries any more.
So what is happening in Canada, what is proven for the first time in religious history? When 'other sexual roles' come into power they are as intolerant as male heterosexuality.
Chrislam's first civil war is likely to be in Sweden, although France is also a suitable candidate. Civil war in Canada is not to be expected in the short term.
Much is already written about Christianity on this blog:
(18) Islam and Christianity in Paradise
(33) Chrislam, God of Policor
(48) Federica Mogherini's lustful submission to Chrislam 🔴 (Timon Dias)
(50) The Cause of Chrislam
(51) Women's emancipation causes Chrislam
(57) Chrislamic orgasm
So what is happening in Canada, what is proven for the first time in religious history? When 'other sexual roles' come into power they are as intolerant as male heterosexuality.
Chrislam's first civil war is likely to be in Sweden, although France is also a suitable candidate. Civil war in Canada is not to be expected in the short term.
Much is already written about Christianity on this blog:
(18) Islam and Christianity in Paradise
(33) Chrislam, God of Policor
(48) Federica Mogherini's lustful submission to Chrislam 🔴 (Timon Dias)
(50) The Cause of Chrislam
(51) Women's emancipation causes Chrislam
(57) Chrislamic orgasm
(235) Homosexual schizophrenia in Christianity
(236) Scaling Christianity
(266) The fall of Christianity
(281) The Religious Revolution: HR = f(SR)
(286) HR = f(SR), Human Religion, Sexual Religion
(292) Animal genetic immortality still governs human religion
No comments:
Post a Comment