About Me

My photo
I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found.

Sunday, 1 December 2019

(295) Omvolking is the battle between subspecies of Homo sapiens

Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive




OMVOLKING/UMVOLKUNG/POPULATION TRANSFER/DEMOGRAPHIC REPLACEMENT

Omvolking (Dutch)
(slang, politics) demographic replacement by exchanging one population for another (mainly as a part of conspiracy theories about white genocide)

https://joostniemoller.nl/2017/09/omvolking-verboden-woord-lezing/

Umvolkung (German)
(politics) a policy that aims at radically changing the demographic composition of a population, through immigration and influencing reproductive behaviour

The word is most often used to refer to the growth of allochthone communities in post-war Germany and western Europe, which is thereby labelled a deliberate strategy to weaken the autochthone. The word was originally restricted to the radical right, but is now seeing some usage among right-wing conservatives.

                                                --------------------------------


The following assumptions are needed to understand this article:


SM-dyad:





SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad:

Assumption 67:

- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind to the farthest stars.

- SM-dyad is based on absolute male power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.

- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.

- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad is the primal relation between male and female.

- The temporary primacy of Vanilla dyad is enforced by the intellectual development of women.


Well, our nephews from Panini don't know SM-dyad, because chimps are not much interested in sex, but bonobos do know Vanilla-dyad:


Assumption 489Political correctness has Vanilla-dyad with masochism (strong).
Bonobos inherited no masochism. But human outbred populations have SM-dyad (weak) with masochism (weak). Later outbred populations as Christianity have SM-dyad (weak) plus masochism (strong) from Desert Religions with SM-dyad (strong) and masochism (strong). Then for Political Correctness (PC), outbred populations have Vanilla-dyad with masochism (strong), which yearns to Islam sadism (strong), leading to Chrislam and civil war.



Assumption 495Political Correctness is the follow up religion from Christianity. It does not matter they do not acknowledge a god in their central core. They are a religion anyway. What matters is the number of recognized sexual roles, which can be seen as gods. Then PC has as many gods as there are individuals in LGBT-xyz to gender dysphoria*, meaning Christianity has evolved into atheism (polytheism).

*Gender dysphoria (GD) is the distress a person feels due to a mismatch between their gender identity and their sex assigned at birth. People who experience gender dysphoria are typically transgender.

Assumption 488
SM-dyad (strong) and SM-dyad (weak). [PC = Political Correctness.]
SM-dyad (strong) is found in Homo sapiens non-PC (Islam, inbreeding). 
SM-dyad (weak) in Homo sapiens non-PC (Ancient Greeks, Old Christianity (Catholicism), outcrossing). Vanilla-dyad is found in Homo sapiens PC (Political Correctness, outcrossing).

SM-dyad (strong) is used in inbreeding cultures like Islam where females are forced to cousin marriages, while their instinctive drive is outcrossing. 
SM-dyad (weak) is found in outcrossing cultures as the ancient Greeks and old Christianity (Catholicism), where females are not oppressed. 

Vanilla-dyad is found in outcrossing cultures from Homo sapiens PC (Political Correctness), where males and females are sexually equivalent.

                                                  --------------------------------


The Omvolking Theory:

There is just one main factor responsible for Omvolking: 

Husband-wife relationship (SM-dyad versus Vanilla-dyad)
SM-Dyad is a sexual instinct formed by Australopithecus. 
Vanilla-dyad is a cultural entity.

This factor can be split into two sub dimensions: 
1: Equivalent sexual roles (monotheism versus polytheism) and 
2: the femininity factor (caused by women's suffrage). 
These two sub dimensions interact strongly:


Below, we see women's suffrage after the sixties of former century first led to Vanilla-dyad (1980) as expression of equal sexual rights, but later caused sexual dissatisfaction and the unconscious yearning to SM-dyad (strong):


Then, the religious component shows the change of old Christianity (semi polytheism) into Political Correctness (polytheism), in which PC erroneously thinks that eliminating God from the central core means giving up religion:



But religion does not necessarily need a central God, a central sexual role at all (male heterosexuality) to be religion. Now PC replaced Christianity with 'all sexual roles' in the center and the mantle. That's polytheism, atheism:




This religious sexual vacuum in the center will lead to Chrislam, the downfall of Western culture:


Anyway, Omvolking (Population Transfer) is a very complicated matter and I am sure it will be better analyzed in the future:




This is what it is all about:

1: Equivalent sexual roles (monotheism versus polytheism).
Monotheism is a super religion based on SM-dyad (strong), which in the end will always defeat polytheism as an inferior religion, which is based on SM-dyad (weak) or Vanilla-dyad. SM-dyad is a sexual instinct from Australopithecus and Vanilla-dyad is just a cultural substitute of civilization. As an example, Islam is a super religion, while Sodom and Gomorrah and Christianity are based on inferior religions. 

In monotheism, women have to be forced to inbreeding through SM-dyad (strong), because they instinctively choose for outcrossing. Then, polytheism is always accompanied by outbreeding, with SM-dyad (weak) or Vanilla-dyad.


2: Femininity factor (caused by women's suffrage) brought Marxist relativism into power in Western parliaments in the sixties of last century. The first thing women changed was SM-dyad (weak) into Vanilla-dyad. In 21st century everywhere expressions of masculinity were replaced by kinda lesbian femininity. Schools lost male teachers and boys were converted into girls. Gender dysphoria became the new religion, producing in principle as many sexual roles as there are people. This is the perfect description of polytheism (atheism) with as many gods as there are sexual roles.


Gods are sexual roles

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality




2: Femininity factor (caused by women's suffrage) brought Marxist relativism into power in Western parliaments in the sixties of last century. The first thing women changed was SM-dyad (weak) into Vanilla-dyad. In the 21st century everywhere expressions of masculinity were replaced by kinda lesbian femininity. Schools lost male teachers and boys were converted into girls. Gender dysphoria became the new religion, producing in principle as many sexual roles as there are people. This is the perfect description of polytheism (atheism) with as many gods as there are sexual roles:



Latent lesbian takeover of Western culture

Omvolking is caused by the reinforcing interaction between Islam as a super religion and women's suffrage. The reason is the major group of female voters unconsciously revitalized their neglected SM-dyad (strong) instinct after they exchanged earlier SM-dyad (weak) for Vanilla-dyad:




Vanilla-dyad Is a cultural intervention which changes men into kinda females. But both sexes were unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad and males became lazy and shifted all kinds of social and sexual tasks to women. Fertility rates collapsed. 


Women in top positions subconsciously longed for SM-dyad (strong), because Vanilla-dyad is against nature of bipedal primates. And it was women in Western society, women as Merkel and Mogherini in top positions, unaware of their own sexual drives, who dragged Muslims into Western Europe.


Both effects will collapse Western society into Chrislam and both effects essentially are governed by SM-dyad, which is an instinct much stronger than Vanilla-dyad, which is not natural and sexually only marginally satisfactory. 

But in addition to the former highly correlated and interacting effects, there is another most fundamental dimension like the division of Homo sapiens into subspecies:

3: Homo sapiens subspecies are being formed under our eyes.



But chimps have no SM-dyad:



Assumption 483Omvolking is the battle between subspecies of Homo sapiens. It is the fight between monotheism and polytheism. Between Political incorrectness and Political Correctness (PC). It is the clash between SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad. Omvorming is not essentially different from the myth of Sodom and Gomorrah.

Like Panini (chimps and bonobos), Homo sapiens is also involved in a process of dichotomy: Political Correctness and Political Incorrectness. It is essentially the same process as from Panini. And if the population only consisted of a few tens of thousands of individuals, like Panini, then each got its own way and two new subspecies would have emerged from Homo sapiens: Homo sapiens monotheism (Non P.C.) and Homo sapiens polytheism (P.C.):


But chimps have no SM-dyad:


But since there are already too many people and the subspecies live closely intermingled together, both cannot be separated in a natural way anymore.

And therefore, the separation of Homo sapiens into two subspecies will lead to yet another civil war. Omvolking results in civil war:


Sodom and Gomorrah had the same dichotomy in PC and Non PC as Omvolking:






Political correctness is discovered by Panini a million years earlier

Humans don't realize how long Homo sapiens is already splitting up during a hurdle run of wars in the evolution:


This development must have been repeated many times in the evolution but cannot be retrieved as ordered below:






Gods are sexual roles

Nearly all religious conflicts in the evolution have to do with the acknowledgment of the number of sexual roles as gods. 

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality




Males try keeping the male heterosexual God for themselves in monotheism. Females try to get as many other female sexual roles added to the script as polytheism. It is the clash between SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad. A lot of wars in history and evolution are about splitting up the human race into these two groups:







And remember, SM-dyad is a sexual instinct from bipedal primates while Vanilla-dyad is only a cultural construct. This means SM-dyad will always win in the end. Males, but also females yearn to sadomasochism as underlying factor in sexuality and human relations:


(150) Amsterdam Post, 5 october 2012 

Two sides are needed to sadomasochism as a cybernetic model. Men can practice sadism occasionally, but for a real sadomasochistic relationship cooperation of women is essential. A very important issue in this analysis.
A second factor is that suffering of Muslim women no longer can be regarded as rejection of Islamic terror. In fact in masochism suffering is a lust. It reinforces submission. At least according to the sadomasochistic principle. So, by definition there is no experimental evidence of sexual dissatisfaction of Muslim women within this Islamic system:




That's what former Christian females, now latent lesbian PC are unknowingly missing. 


Super Religions (Islam) and Inferior Religions (Christianity)


Islam (sadism) and Christianity (masochism) are artificially acquired extremes on the Desert Religious distribution, enforced by stubborn indoctrination. But by losing grip on their fossilized cultures, Islam and Christianity are collapsing to the center of the distribution (sadomasochism). And that's why Chrislam will become the new human religion (HR). They all (PC) will be swallowed in a vortex of sexual lust. They unconsciously romanticized SM just like controlled BDSM in Western society, but were unaware of the psychopathic reality (Sweden today):



Human Religions are functions of Sexual Religions:



 Super religions are simply based on SM-dyad (strong):


(245) Super religions are caused by inbreeding
(246) Superior and inferior religions
(247) Prophets are the real gods of the people 
(248) Extreme and moderate religions






Chrislam and Bonochimp




Always in the evolution new religions are born out of sexuality. This normally leads to the splitting of a species, mostly by natural circumstances. A great example is the split of Panini into chimpanzees and bonobos:


This split is caused by a very dry period about two million years ago, after which chimps became isolated north of the Congo river and bonobos south. And now they have become different species with a slightly different genome. But the astonishing point is bonobos have the same religion as Christians, while chimps are amazingly similar to Muslims:



More interesting is chimps live just like Muslims (desert life) in a harsh environment with gorillas, which steal their fiber foods, while bonobos, like Christians, live in a pleasant environment (Christians live in Northern Europe, in the land of milk and honey and a temperate climate). Christians and bonobos have as much fiber foods for themselves as they want.

(42) The Split in Panini Religion
(78) Roaming led to bonobo religion

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/3/l_073_03.html

'Why, then, have chimps not evolved this social structure? The answer may lie in the history of the habitats they occupy. Both species of primates live in tropical forests along the Zaire River -- chimps north of the river, bonobos to the south. Their environments seem to be quite similar today. But about 2.5 million years ago, there seems to have been a lengthy drought in southern Zaire that wiped out the preferred food plants of gorillas and sent the primates packing. After the drought ended, the forests returned, but the gorillas did not.[bonobos nowadays are without gorillas.]' 







'Chimpanzees [nowadays bonobos] in this environment south of the river had the forest to themselves, and could exploit the fiber foods that had previously been eaten by gorillas -- foods that are still eaten by gorillas to the north [chimps nowadays with gorillas], this additional food to tide them [bonobos] over between fruit trees, they could travel in larger, more stable parties, and form strong social bonds. They became bonobos.'

'On the north side of the river, the (nowadays) chimps had to share their niche with gorillaswhich eat the fiber foods. The chimps have to compete for fruit, and occasionally meat, food resources that tend to be widely scattered. Female chimps disperse into the forest with their infants to find enough to eat, and cannot spend time together to forge strong bonds. The changes in social behavior that occurred in response to this environmental factor may be what led chimps down a different evolutionary path, toward a society more prone to violence.' 


                                                ------------------------------


Because Panini and Homo sapiens are highly related species, we can still draw another conclusion:




Like Panini (chimps and bonobos), Homo sapiens is also involved in a process of dichotomy: Political Correctness and Political Incorrectness. If the population only consisted of a few tens of thousands of individuals, like Panini, then each got its own way and two sub species emerged from Homo sapiens: Homo sapiens monotheism (Non P.C.) and Homo sapiens polytheism (P.C.).

But since there are already too many people and the subspecies live closely together, both cannot be separated in a natural way anymore.


Sodom and Gomorrah have the same dichotomy in P.C. and Non P.C .:

No comments:

Post a Comment