Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
This article comes down to the realization that genetic immortality from the animal world is still the main religious drive of humanity. Human religion is only sublimated into mystical formulations. Further, only bipedal primates (no animals) were able to implement sadomasochism into sexual relationships. Also, humans disguised male sexual lust in a cloud from muttered statements to grant authority to their desire to impress the females, where they lacked any persuasiveness by sexual bravado alone.
The course of religion is determined by the primal sexual law in nature: outcrossing. Animals project their afterlife in the offspring, what we call 'genetic immortality'. They know that they themselves eventually will die.
Genetic immortality, split into inbreeding and crossbreeding is what we call the basic dimension:
But now we have a problem, because genetic immortality with a soul led to earthly reincarnation (Homo erectus: 2,2 Mya; 900cc), what excludes later resurrection in the parallel universe (Homo sapiens: 350 Ka; 1400cc), since in the parallel universe only the individual resurrects and there is no offspring to produce. So, resurrection stands diametrically on genetic immortality and is a disgrace for the basic sexual law of nature:
Assumption 472: Genetic immortality (without soul) is animal religion and is living on in the genes of the offspring, while the individual dies. Reincarnation is exactly the same religion (but now with a soul), in which the individual reincarnates into descendants. Because of the nearly identical link with animal religion, reincarnation is the strongest human religion, which will survive all the others with the soul. Atheism (without soul) is identical to genetic immortality and is purely animal religion. In the end atheism will survive all human religions.
Last but not least it is easy to believe in reincarnation without accepting a god. But it is difficult to believe in the afterlife in some parallel universe without a god.
RELIGIONS ARE FUNCTIONS OF EARLIER RELIGIONS. ISLAM IS A FUNCTION OF INBREEDING, BECAUSE IT WAS THE LATER RELIGION:
THEN, BECAUSE CHRISTIANITY IS THE INVERSE OF COUSIN MARRIAGES, THE INVERSE OF INBREEDING, CHRISTIANITY IS A FUNCTION OF OUTBREEDING, BECAUSE OUTCROSSING WAS THE EARLIER SEXUAL RELIGION:
We conclude the basic law of sexuality (genetic immortality) governs human religion, just like the SM-dyad governs the sexual relationships between the sexes. Now it happens Islam is governed by SM-dyad and its predecessor Inbreeding is governed by reincarnation. This makes the Muslim faith a really ancient form of human religion.
Inbreeding is abnormal in nature, but this religion was born from the cultural heritage of the first bipedal hominids, alienated from their kind by fanning in all directions. Well, this period took about 5 to 7 million years, enough to embrace Inbreeding as a Sexual Religion in our genes.
So, we learned the following:
- Though an afterlife keeping the own genes (rebirth, resurrection) is more desirable than reincarnation into descendants, it is less credible.
- An afterlife on Earth is more credible than in some parallel universe.
The most attractive afterlife
Human religion not only developed through progressive abstraction of religious concepts, but also into the direction of the most attractive afterlife. In all cases, coming to life again in the own family appears to be most powerful. That's why Reincarnation by Inbreeding in the end will win from Resurrection in Heaven. The former is an instinct while the last is imposed on the people to block inbreeding.
Graphic representations differ due to the purpose of display. The above diagram is about 'choice' in the afterlife. Rebirth and resurrection lie against each other because they have much in common. Both come to life again in their own body.
To be clear, both reincarnation (with a soul) by inbreeding and outcrossing are derivatives from genetic immortality (without soul). But reincarnation by outcrossing is the natural successor of genetic immortality (outbreeding) and developed out of quadrupedal primates (chimps). On the other hand 'reincarnation through inbreeding' developed in a straight line from bipedal primates, the hominids (inbreeding).
The parallel universe is an advancement from Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1400cc):
The Fake Universe
There are two major reasons for the invention of the parallel universe:
First reason to believe in the fake universe
Why would anybody believe in the parallel universe, if he believed in earthly reincarnation earlier? Let us see, African Negroes believe in Voodoo, a religion from Homo erectus. They believe in reincarnation, but not in resurrection. Also, Hindus believe in reincarnation. Why is that? Both are outbreeding cultures. Maybe there is some inbreeding here and there, but It is simple, for outbreeding cultures there is no limitation to the possible afterlife destinations with reincarnation, because in principle they can get the whole human race as possible descendants.
But for inbred populations it is quite a different story, because with earthly reincarnation they will not live forever. Tribes and families easily die out by fertility stress from autosomal recessive disorders. This is a severe inbreeding problem. So, the afterlife with earthly reincarnation is limited to and conditioned on the the survival of the group, the tribe or the family. That is also precisely the reason for honor killings. Muslim males are unconsciously terrified to lose their afterlife if the family does not expand by cousin marriages. Those Muslims do not really believe in resurrection. They inherited the inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
So we list the pros and cons:
Advantages of the parallel universe above earthly reincarnation:
- Inbred populations organized a flight to the parallel universe as reward for their dull inbred sex life. In the parallel universe was outbreeding with a lot of wild blonde virgins from other tribes. Much better than reincarnation into the own tribe with the same ugly cousins and nieces.
- That is to say, smaller tribes had less choice in beautiful women and yearned more to the parallel universe than larger tribes.
- But smallest tribes are families, which desired earthly reincarnation because of the 'inbreeding - reincarnation' instinct (intervening variable)
Islam and Hinduism:
Inbred populations from Desert religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) were probably the original advocates of the parallel universe. Then, other religions like Hinduism, which stuck to reincarnation, apparently were no inbred populations. Possibly their layers of social classes were somewhat inbred, but members had the prospect to elevate themselves into higher classes (outbreeding) after reincarnation:
And that is the difference with Desert religions, which had to reincarnate into inbreeding, into their own tribe: perpetual inbreeding in the afterlife is kind of a curse:
Resuming: Members from inbred populations must always reincarnate into their own inbred culture, which is disastrous, especially for women, because inbreeding is a male thing of propagating their self-identity in eternity.
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
Preface
The course of religion (summary)
But a variant from genetic immortality can be adapted to mammals living in groups together combining inbreeding (the Alpha male) with outbreeding (females in the mantle). And because the strongest male is in charge only for a few years, the end effect is outbreeding in accordance with the basic sexual law of nature.
Bipedal primates were group animals in the first place, but they also lived in enforced inbreeding cultures, because they fanned out in all directions, without sufficient possibilities to exchange juvenile females with other groups. So, there are at least two reasons why bipedal primates fell for inbreeding:
-1: Bipedal primates are group animals.
-2: Bipedal primates lost sight of other groups to exchange juvenile females.
Another complication is that bipedal primates were slow breeders (fertility stress), which until 100,000 years ago never had more than about 24,000 breeding pairs in Africa and the rest of the world. The farther they walked away, the less likely they were to meet other tribes:
-3: Bipedal primates lost exponentially sight of other groups as in the Big Bang.
The good news is that they had a varied genome like chimps and could stand inbreeding much better than Homo sapiens:
-4: Bipedal primates (Australopithecus) have stand inbreeding for seven million years.
That's why the human race has inherited a sexual model with inbreeding, which is diametrically opposed to the original meaning of genetic immortality by outbreeding.
This all means, only for bipedal primates the course of religion is fundamentally determined by inbreeding:
Because genetic immortality - without soul - is the basic sexual law of nature, also humans are bound to follow this law, no matter how malformed by inbreeding. And because animals instinctively want to project their genes into offspring, humans want the same.
But now we have a problem, because genetic immortality with a soul led to earthly reincarnation (Homo erectus: 2,2 Mya; 900cc), what excludes later resurrection in the parallel universe (Homo sapiens: 350 Ka; 1400cc), since in the parallel universe only the individual resurrects and there is no offspring to produce. So, resurrection stands diametrically on genetic immortality and is a disgrace for the basic sexual law of nature:
Reincarnation fits genetic immortality perfectly well, though with a soul. This means, reincarnation is the most powerful human religion in the world*. And it works out perfectly for inbreeding as well as for outbreeding.
* Atheism without soul is identical to genetic immortality and will surpass reincarnation in time:
This all means, in the long run Desert Religions (resurrection) will lose from reincarnation. Especially, Islam will lose from reincarnation by inbreeding (honor killings).
And we already saw Christianity evolving into atheism (without a soul), which follows purely the primal law of sexuality: genetic immortality without a soul and without an afterlife for the individual. As already said, we also can expect the Muslim faith falling apart by Islam (HR, Human Religion), which is losing power over Inbreeding (SR, Sexual Religion).
Humans better realize that their religions are governed by sexual laws, that Desert Regions were a reaction to an overflow from autosomal recessive disorders from inbreeding cultures, and that Christianity is embraced only by outbreeding cultures, which in the end will return to genetic immortality (atheism):
THEN, BECAUSE CHRISTIANITY IS THE INVERSE OF COUSIN MARRIAGES, THE INVERSE OF INBREEDING, CHRISTIANITY IS A FUNCTION OF OUTBREEDING, BECAUSE OUTCROSSING WAS THE EARLIER SEXUAL RELIGION:
We conclude the basic law of sexuality (genetic immortality) governs human religion, just like the SM-dyad governs the sexual relationships between the sexes. Now it happens Islam is governed by SM-dyad and its predecessor Inbreeding is governed by reincarnation. This makes the Muslim faith a really ancient form of human religion.
Again, what is religion?
Assumption 471: Religion is a function of male sexuality to dominate women with religious authority, where male sexual lust alone does not impress the females.
Of course, we don't see plain sexuality so clearly anymore in nowadays religions, since they are born out of numerous derivatives from foregoing religions in the evolution. The effects are still there but hidden in an esoterically soup of mystical formulations:
Well, religion is not that profane, not that banal, its not all plain sex what males desire, for they also want to live forever, to have sex forever, to acquire perpetual orgasm, that's all what males really want:
Their religion is plain sex to all eternity:
Would it be anyhow possible that the highest values in a man's life are congruent to his deepest sexual desires? Its a shame to suppose they can be identical. But analyzing all religious statements points to only one main factor: male sexuality. Therefore we must analyze human religion better:
Bipeds are notorious inbreeders by culture:
This led to inbreeding (SR; Sexual Religion), the endogamic variant of religion, also forthcoming from genetic immortality. Normally (solitary) species like gannets, roaming together about 50 years around the world seas, would select just the outcrossing variant which is the basic natural law:
But bipedal primates living in groups together chose for a combination of inbreeding (Alpha male) and outbreeding (females in the mantle):
That's not abnormal for higher mammals living in groups together. The Alpha male is only in charge as long he is the strongest with the best genes. But for humans it is quite different, it is called genome inflation. In the evolution, weak hominin males (humans) with high social status were able to fertilize all tribal females for decades. And yeah, then you get autosomal recessive disorders over generations, especially for Homo sapiens with his already diminished genome variability:
This behavior was replicated in the male kin bonded lineage for ages, capturing the own daughters and grand daughters (cousin marriages) for 'gene breeding':
Below we see the healthy form of genetic immortality with the exchange of juvenile females from other tribes and the inbreeding variant with cousin marriages:
Genetic immortality is normally used for males who thought to have no soul and to die for ever. Then, they would only live forth in their descendants by their genes. But of course, the Ethiopians believed above already in the soul since Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
The course of religion
Above we recapitulated the state of the art of human religion. But something is missing. We know the rankorder of religious concepts in the evolution, but what makes that one form of religion is chosen over the other. Maybe it is already plain clear, but yet we must nevertheless reason the order, as follows:
The soul
We already know the conception of the soul as the major advancement from the hominins, in which they outperform the hominids:
Without the soul the hominids had no steering power over their afterlife. They just did not expect to return to real life either - and would sleep forever - and resigned themselves to their fate of genetic immortality from their genes in their descendants.
Though this most important finding of the soul in human religion is not their first achievement of bipedal primates. The first distinction between humans and animals is 'inbreeding and outbreeding':
Inbreeding and outbreeding
We immediately see the difference between quadrupeds and bipeds:
Rankorder of religious rules:
-1: Genetic immortality in descendants.
-2: Inbreeding or outbreeding.
-3: Rebirth in the own renewed body
-4: Reincarnation with inbreeding or outbreeding.
-5: Resurrection on Earth.
-6: Resurrection in the parallel universe.
-7: Resurrection in the multiverse.
We see inbreeding does not change the rank order of religious concepts in the evolution, it doesn't of course, because this order is determined by intellectual development:
In the end, this article comes down to the realization that genetic immortality from the animal world is still the main religious drive of humans. Human religion is only sublimated into mystical formulations. Further, only bipedal primates (no animals) were able to implement sadomasochism into sexual relationships. Also, humans disguised male sexual lust in a cloud from muttered statements to grant authority to their desire to impress the females, where they lacked any persuasiveness by sexual bravado alone.
Rebirth without soul
We think that Homo naledi believed in rebirth without a soul, but his opinion changed back and forth from soul to no soul. This is caused by rebirth being a short-term transition area from genetic immortality to reincarnation. Because, an intelligent species as Homo naledi must have rejected the soul consciously, since he already knew the soul, just like nowadays atheists:
Further, Homo naledi definitely was an inbreeding tribe:
Assumption 376: Tribal rebirth means the conservation of group identity if reborn are former ancestors. This emphasizes group identity from inbred cultures. Otherwise it would concern hybrids. In the case of outbreeding cultures the identity of reborn is not important and hybrids from other tribes are welcomed. This means outbreeding cultures will bury their dead simply in the ground. And because Homo naledi protected the bodies of the deceased fanatically, we decide them to be an inbred culture.
There undoubtedly were other Australopiths who buried their dead in the open ground, because though they believed in 'rebirth without soul' they also believed in rebirth into all kinds of other hominids, what means outbreeding. They as well acknowledged to have no influence on that choice but did not bother. Maybe they were not that spastic about the Underworld and the God of Darkness as Homo naledi:
It is our opinion that though Homo naledi was kind of Australopith, he must already be seen as a human being. Homo naledi operated on the border of hominins and the animal world. Some tribes believed already in reincarnation, while others just fell back to rebirth, due to small tribal variation and lack of cultural communication.
Reincarnation
Reincarnation is that not different from genetic immortality without soul, besides now hominins believed to have a soul and so steering capability to choose where they would reborn by reincarnation.
This relationship with genetic immortality makes reincarnation to the most powerful and influential religion of mankind:
Again, just like genetic immortality, there exists an inbreeding as well as an outbreeding variant:
But more importantly, there is a huge difference between resurrection and rebirth. Resurrection is to come back to life with your own body, just like rebirth. People keep their own genes (Islam). The problem is that resurrection and rebirth are difficult to imagine, what makes them somewhat unreal and unbelievable. Rebirth looks much more natural than resurrection, because we can witness the birth process. Furthermore rebirth is on Earth and resurrection usually is thought in heaven from the parallel universe:
So, we learned the following:
- Though an afterlife keeping the own genes (rebirth, resurrection) is more desirable than reincarnation into descendants, it is less credible.
- An afterlife on Earth is more credible than in some parallel universe.
The most attractive afterlife
Human religion not only developed through progressive abstraction of religious concepts, but also into the direction of the most attractive afterlife. In all cases, coming to life again in the own family appears to be most powerful. That's why Reincarnation by Inbreeding in the end will win from Resurrection in Heaven. The former is an instinct while the last is imposed on the people to block inbreeding.
Graphic representations differ due to the purpose of display. The above diagram is about 'choice' in the afterlife. Rebirth and resurrection lie against each other because they have much in common. Both come to life again in their own body.
To be clear, both reincarnation (with a soul) by inbreeding and outcrossing are derivatives from genetic immortality (without soul). But reincarnation by outcrossing is the natural successor of genetic immortality (outbreeding) and developed out of quadrupedal primates (chimps). On the other hand 'reincarnation through inbreeding' developed in a straight line from bipedal primates, the hominids (inbreeding).
Originally all human religions are functions of sexual religion (HR= f(SR)):
The Fake Universe
There are two major reasons for the invention of the parallel universe:
First reason to believe in the fake universe
Why would anybody believe in the parallel universe, if he believed in earthly reincarnation earlier? Let us see, African Negroes believe in Voodoo, a religion from Homo erectus. They believe in reincarnation, but not in resurrection. Also, Hindus believe in reincarnation. Why is that? Both are outbreeding cultures. Maybe there is some inbreeding here and there, but It is simple, for outbreeding cultures there is no limitation to the possible afterlife destinations with reincarnation, because in principle they can get the whole human race as possible descendants.
But for inbred populations it is quite a different story, because with earthly reincarnation they will not live forever. Tribes and families easily die out by fertility stress from autosomal recessive disorders. This is a severe inbreeding problem. So, the afterlife with earthly reincarnation is limited to and conditioned on the the survival of the group, the tribe or the family. That is also precisely the reason for honor killings. Muslim males are unconsciously terrified to lose their afterlife if the family does not expand by cousin marriages. Those Muslims do not really believe in resurrection. They inherited the inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
Second reason to believe in the fake universe
Inbreeding cultures are delighted to go to heaven of the parallel universe as reward for the terrible inbreeding culture on Earth. Well, that is only possible if heaven if this means outbreeding, what it does:
Not officially, officially the parallel universe is a-sexual to interrupt the inbreeding cycle with descendants:
But a-sexuality does not work for Muslims
For example, one can break this cycle by killing his only son Isaac (Abraham):
Or by honor killing his daughter, to demonstrate Allah that he really believes in heaven:
We can reconstruct the raison d'ĂȘtre of the parallel universe in retrospect, but we do not have to go immediately to perform a logical balance of all arguments. Because, advantages and disadvantages of the parallel universe were probably not related at that time.Inbreeding cultures are delighted to go to heaven of the parallel universe as reward for the terrible inbreeding culture on Earth. Well, that is only possible if heaven if this means outbreeding, what it does:
Not officially, officially the parallel universe is a-sexual to interrupt the inbreeding cycle with descendants:
But a-sexuality does not work for Muslims
For example, one can break this cycle by killing his only son Isaac (Abraham):
Or by honor killing his daughter, to demonstrate Allah that he really believes in heaven:
So we list the pros and cons:
Advantages of the parallel universe above earthly reincarnation:
- Inbred populations organized a flight to the parallel universe as reward for their dull inbred sex life. In the parallel universe was outbreeding with a lot of wild blonde virgins from other tribes. Much better than reincarnation into the own tribe with the same ugly cousins and nieces.
- That is to say, smaller tribes had less choice in beautiful women and yearned more to the parallel universe than larger tribes.
- But smallest tribes are families, which desired earthly reincarnation because of the 'inbreeding - reincarnation' instinct (intervening variable)
Islam and Hinduism:
Inbred populations from Desert religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) were probably the original advocates of the parallel universe. Then, other religions like Hinduism, which stuck to reincarnation, apparently were no inbred populations. Possibly their layers of social classes were somewhat inbred, but members had the prospect to elevate themselves into higher classes (outbreeding) after reincarnation:
And that is the difference with Desert religions, which had to reincarnate into inbreeding, into their own tribe: perpetual inbreeding in the afterlife is kind of a curse:
Resuming: Members from inbred populations must always reincarnate into their own inbred culture, which is disastrous, especially for women, because inbreeding is a male thing of propagating their self-identity in eternity.
No comments:
Post a Comment