Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
We think Homo naledi was definitely an inbred population. They may have had some introgressive hybridization on a low DNA level, which however did not cause their modern hands, wrists, legs and feet. Their wrists and feet were more advanced than Homo erectus, while Homo naledi lived too far in the North of Africa. So, no systematic introgressive hybridization with Homo erectus and Homo sapiens is to be expected.
However, Homo naledi and Homo erectus were two million years contemporaries. So introgression can certainly be assumed. So, we are making a mistake above.
Above conclusion was as if Homo erectus delivered the advanced characteristics to Homo naledi, but that's wrong, it is the other way around.
So, what if Homo naledi delivered the advanced features to Homo erectus? What if Homo naledi brought in the advanced legs, arms, hands, wrists and feet? The other way around?
Then we better forget about convergent evolution, as if Homo naledi converged to advanced features like Homo sapiens, simply by adaptation to the environment:
Assumption 398: Homo naledi theoretically can have been an extremely inbred population without much contact with modern hominins. But still, they can have developed human characteristics by convergent evolution:
It must be remarked convergent evolution would also have given Homo erectus these Homo sapiens characteristics. But that did not happen. Maybe as Lee Berger suggests, Homo naledi is the principal and ancient ancestor of Homo sapiens, a shocking insight. So, maybe Homo naledi was the core Australopithecus from which we all descend.
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
We have written a lot on this blog about the possible interbreeding between Homo naledi and Homo erectus. Finally, they lived together for 2 million years in Africa. But we missed a good theoretical entrance. But in his latest interview Prof. dr. Dr. Lee Berger said that possibly Homo naledi could be our ancient ancestor. Thinking about that means Homo erectus delivered the body to Homo sapiens and the enlarged skull, but Homo naledi brought in the hands, wrists, feet and legs. So the most modern features came from Homo naledi (Australopithecus) and the psychotic brain from Homo erectus. So we have common sense convert.
Homo naledi
PROF. DR. LEE BERGER: ANOTHER MAJOR HOMININ DISCOVERY COMING. IT'S NOT SEDIBA, IT'S NOT NALEDI, COULD BE PARANTHROPUS ROBUSTUS (AUSTRALOPITHECUS). BTW, THEY FOUND ALSO NEW HOMO NALEDI REMAINS, PLACED INTO NICHES IN THE WALLS OF CAVES.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7Q3EGYI78M
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2219742-lee-berger-we-have-made-another-major-discovery-about-early-humans/
The discovery of Homo naledi by Prof. dr. Lee Berger has been vital for our understanding of the development of human religion. We can't discuss Homo naledi without mentioning his name. But he has no relationship with this blog.
LEE BERGER: WAS HOMO NALEDI OUR
AUSTRALOPITHECINE ANCESTOR?
This allows us to establish a nearly direct connection between Homo naledi and Homo sapiens, which means that the modern features of Homo naledi can be transferred to Homo sapiens via Homo erectus. BTW, Homo naledi and Homo erectus lived together for two million years:
Homo naledi
PROF. DR. LEE BERGER: ANOTHER MAJOR HOMININ DISCOVERY COMING. IT'S NOT SEDIBA, IT'S NOT NALEDI, COULD BE PARANTHROPUS ROBUSTUS (AUSTRALOPITHECUS). BTW, THEY FOUND ALSO NEW HOMO NALEDI REMAINS, PLACED INTO NICHES IN THE WALLS OF CAVES.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7Q3EGYI78M
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2219742-lee-berger-we-have-made-another-major-discovery-about-early-humans/
The discovery of Homo naledi by Prof. dr. Lee Berger has been vital for our understanding of the development of human religion. We can't discuss Homo naledi without mentioning his name. But he has no relationship with this blog.
LEE BERGER: WAS HOMO NALEDI OUR
AUSTRALOPITHECINE ANCESTOR?
This allows us to establish a nearly direct connection between Homo naledi and Homo sapiens, which means that the modern features of Homo naledi can be transferred to Homo sapiens via Homo erectus. BTW, Homo naledi and Homo erectus lived together for two million years:
Our former conclusion:
We think Homo naledi was definitely an inbred population. They may have had some introgressive hybridization on a low DNA level, which however did not cause their modern hands, wrists, legs and feet. Their wrists and feet were more advanced than Homo erectus, while Homo naledi lived too far in the North of Africa. So, no systematic introgressive hybridization with Homo erectus and Homo sapiens is to be expected.
However, Homo naledi and Homo erectus were two million years contemporaries. So introgression can certainly be assumed. So, we are making a mistake above.
Above conclusion was as if Homo erectus delivered the advanced characteristics to Homo naledi, but that's wrong, it is the other way around.
So, what if Homo naledi delivered the advanced features to Homo erectus? What if Homo naledi brought in the advanced legs, arms, hands, wrists and feet? The other way around?
Then we better forget about convergent evolution, as if Homo naledi converged to advanced features like Homo sapiens, simply by adaptation to the environment:
Assumption 398: Homo naledi theoretically can have been an extremely inbred population without much contact with modern hominins. But still, they can have developed human characteristics by convergent evolution:
It must be remarked convergent evolution would also have given Homo erectus these Homo sapiens characteristics. But that did not happen. Maybe as Lee Berger suggests, Homo naledi is the principal and ancient ancestor of Homo sapiens, a shocking insight. So, maybe Homo naledi was the core Australopithecus from which we all descend.
Assumption 470: Homo naledi was the core Australopithecus from which we all descend. Homo naledi is the principal and ancient ancestor of Homo sapiens. Homo naledi interbred with Homo erectus and delivered the advanced extremities as modern legs, hands, wrists and feet.
Homo erectus brought in his retarded cauliflower brain which caused him to seriously derailed into magical religion, in which he sexually terrorized the females. So, there must have been two breeding lines of Homo erectus, with and without advanced features from Homo naledi.
Homo erectus brought in his retarded cauliflower brain which caused him to seriously derailed into magical religion, in which he sexually terrorized the females. So, there must have been two breeding lines of Homo erectus, with and without advanced features from Homo naledi.
Then we must redraw our predecessor line. Maybe we have to split Homo erectus into two subspecies, like chimps and bonobos from Panini or like political correctness and non-pc from Homo sapiens:
So, the point is we must reverse our way of thinking:
Homo erectus is the retarded species and Homo naledi is the advanced species, just what this blog always said. The brain from Homo naledi was the natural rational brain to survive in the horrible African nights with only wooden spears and ropes. On the other hand Homo erectus got an absurdly enlarged cauliflower brain, comparable with the senseless teeth from sable tooth tigers. This psychotic brain was meant for magical thinking for males to intimidate females with absurd sexual rules, as if coming from God.
So introgression between Homo naledi and Homo erectus may have laid the foundation for homo sapiens:
So, the point is we must reverse our way of thinking:
Homo erectus is the retarded species and Homo naledi is the advanced species, just what this blog always said. The brain from Homo naledi was the natural rational brain to survive in the horrible African nights with only wooden spears and ropes. On the other hand Homo erectus got an absurdly enlarged cauliflower brain, comparable with the senseless teeth from sable tooth tigers. This psychotic brain was meant for magical thinking for males to intimidate females with absurd sexual rules, as if coming from God.
So introgression between Homo naledi and Homo erectus may have laid the foundation for homo sapiens:
(144) Homo naledi, the raped species
(145) Homo naledi, the inferior species
(190) Australopithecus interbred with Homo sapiens?
(145) Homo naledi, the inferior species
(190) Australopithecus interbred with Homo sapiens?
No comments:
Post a Comment