.png)
Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Resume
The Tree of Knowledge demonstrates the mental conflict women feel between their natural desire for genetic diversity versus unnatural genetic monoculture. Therefore in exogamous Christianity Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding, the Tree of Knowledge and in endogamous Islam Adam desired genetic monoculture and ate from the Tree of Inbreeding, the Tree of Life. Many thousand years ago people must have understand better what we have forgotten.
The Myth of Adam and Eve has been an initiation rite for young males for millions of years, which was transferred without spoken language from the darker abscesses of the human mind. It warned males for the lust of women (Eve) into males of foreign tribes (the Serpents), since in nature women guard genetic diversity. That's why Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding (The Tree of Knowledge) in the original version of the myth:
.jpg)
(See Attachment 2)
In the original myth of the Homoninae (7 Ma; 400cc) religion was 'genetic immortality in descendants'. After Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) religion changed into 'reincarnation into the earthly universe'.
It can be seen Judaism and Christianity paraphrased the original myth in which inbreeding was promoted and Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding (Tree of Knowledge). But Christianity gave a twist to the narrative and developed quite a new religion without inbreeding and incest.
After Homo sapiens (350 ka;1400cc) people invented the soul and resurrection into Heaven of the parallel universe. And that means always outbreeding in exogamy. Both Christianity and Islam originally meant to leave earthly inbreeding and incest and adhered outbreeding and exogamy in Heaven of the parallel universe.
Though Islam originally had good intentions like Christians, they messed up with inbreeding and incest from which they could not come off, since Muslims have an inbreeding instinct. That's the tragic of Islam, the tragic of the Muslim culture, because the mingling of two universes into one religion is a schizophrenic disaster for believers. One cannot believe in 'resurrection into the parallel universe' in the conscious and at the same time believe in 'reincarnation into the earthly universe' in the unconscious and remain intellectually sound and stable:
Notice, initially inbreeding was not promoted but condemned by Islam. Therefore, Islam had to change the narrative essentially and let Adam eat from his beloved Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life). So Islam definitely reversed the meaning of the Myth of Adam and Eve. Because Adam had fallen for genetic monoculture of the Tree of Life, he had to leave Paradise. Maybe he ever will ever be admitted into Heaven of the parallel universe at doomsday.
Both Christianity and Islam tried to lead their believers into Heaven of the parallel universe. Christianity succeeded to defeat inbreeding and incest. But Islam failed and merged with this former religion in a schizophrenic way. It must be said Christianity was only welcomed in already exogamous outbred cultures.
Remember Female Allah originally yearned to an exogamous parallel universe. It were Muslim males who messed up Heaven in the ego of Islamic culture:
.jpg)
Religion and ethnicity
Every culture finds its matching religion. Peoples and religions fit together. Muslims and Christians have different religions and are also completely different peoples. They will not assimilate without any of them giving up its religion.
There after, for Muslims it will take about 20 generations of forced outbreeding to lose their inbreeding instinct. This means a civil war seems unavoidable and much better the situation can be controlled fiercely without falsely supposing and claiming 'integration' by multiculturalism:
From the beginning we considered Islam as a hybrid religion with Inbreeding and Incest:
IMO 'inbreeding and incest' has become an instinct in humanlike creatures in the last 7 million years. Of course Christians emerged from the same species, but their instinct has been diluted by outbreeding with other exogamous peoples already many thousands of years ago.
The parallel universe
Before we proceed we must determine the status of the parallel universe in Genesis.
In the bible, 'angels' were accepted to exist and we decide them to belong to the parallel universe. Angels apparently could travel between the universes:
Assumption 180: Abraham and heaven. There is no heaven called in Genesis other than as ceiling of the earth. Also there is no mention of reincarnation into the earthly or into the parallel universe. And there is no evidence that Abraham, Isaac or God ever existed. But we do know the evolution of human religion follows logical laws. What means the level of abstraction of eternal life determines human religious development. Therefore, we interpret the myth of Abraham at best as the transition from earthly reincarnation to reincarnation into the parallel universe. The parallel universe is the final abstraction of eternal existence discovered by man.
But remember, the Tree of Life only promoted eternal life on Earth, not in the parallel universe:
Christianity fled from Inbreeding and Incest
A faction led by Jesus Christ seceded from Jewish monotheism and fled into polytheism, where it acknowledged 'other sexual roles' as subjects:
Christians tore themselves free from monotheistic sadism, but now their masochism lost direction in space, however. Masochism without sadism is meaningless. Therefore they constructed a new concept of evil as 'sin' in themselves. So they again found their second point in space to determine the direction of their masochistic lust. Christianity cannot survive without sadistic checkpoint, for which Islam invites itself in Western culture nowadays:
Anyway, they projected their religion orthogonal to inbreeding and incest and invented a completely new religion, in which evil was situated as sin into themselves.
At that time Christians very well understood the narrative of Adam and Eve. All of which we have forgotten. They knew it originally advocated 'genetic immortality in descendants' by inbreeding and incest. They also knew genetic immortality had been set aside by 'reincarnation into the earthly universe':
Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Both forms of religion were afraid of adulterous women like Eve who sought genetic diversity with the Serpent of another tribe and let men like Adam think the resulting child was his.
But Christians chose to reject and neglect inbreeding at all and focused only on Heaven in the parallel universe. So they projected a completely new religion orthogonal to the narrative. From the narrative they acknowledged the first version of the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc) in which young males as initiation rite were warned non verbally for the adulterous genetic lust to diversity of women. This means Christians followed the Jewish Script and let Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge what was seen as 'evil', a very abstract formulation of adultery.
In fact Christians constructed a double religious system: Firstly, sin versus guilt, and secondly the masochistic prayer versus his not existing inner God (sadism). Sin, guilt and God are the unknowns in these equations, this schizophrenic homo-erotic praying of Christians. It is an ingenious system and it works rather well and it is the better of the two religions. Thus, the system is intertwined:
Psychologically, Christianity first constructed 'guilt' which had to be punished and what generated their beloved masochism, what is a sexual lust. This guilt, which is the well known and hypothetical 'sin', would lead to a sadistic reaction of God, who would condemn and forbid Christians to enter Heaven of the parallel universe. Then Christians invented a Deus ex machina in the form of an identifiable and human like Super person, Jesus Christ, God alike, who gave a moralistic turn to guilt in that he took all guilt on his shoulders. This last part is 'displacement' of hypothetical guilt. Then, by the suffering of Christ they created 'sublimation' of the earthly paradise - from which they were banished - into Heaven of the parallel universe. Really, this is well conceived.
What we see is Christianity could not satisfy its masochistic lust without sadism and that's why they constructed 'sin' as evil. In our days Western peoples do not believe in Christianity any longer, but their masochistic lust must be relieved, and that's why policor (political correctness), former Christians, Marxists, socialists, left wingers and latent lesbian feminists are so fond of Islam, without realizing what drives them into Chrislam:
ISLAM
There is an abundance of indications which shows Islam as the continuation of Paradise culture of inbreeding and incest. That's no news:
More important is how Islam is connected to inbreeding in the earliest stages of building its religion. Did they alter the Myth of Paradise? They did. Was there any link with inbreeding? There was, very likely.
So, where did Islam change the narrative of Adam and Eve and how can this be explained by inbreeding and incest? It all started with the tree in the middle of the garden.
The tree in the middle of the garden
The Myth of Paradise is a joke with two false bottoms from which Islam benefited to change the Tree of Knowledge into the Tree of Life.
The first obvious bottom is the Tree of Knowledge, which would have been situated in the middle of the garden:
(Gen 2:9) And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
See Appendix.
But this sentence contains likely a false suggestion, not done by the Jews because the myth was well known in those days but millennia earlier by a previous culture of incest and inbreeding. Since from the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was placed.
-----------------------------
[The place of the tree of knowledge cannot be known by speech parsing. It might have been in the middle or at the border of the garden. Realize how easy it was to imply the tree of knowledge as follows: ]
And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life AND the tree of knowledge also in the midst of the garden.
[We conclude this is cunningly and intentionally so written by God. This must be misleading!]
But maybe they meant the following: the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and as the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
The second double bottom is the statement of Eve in which God would have said 'of the tree in the middle of the garden should not be eaten':
-----------------------------
God said the following:
And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat.
Step 1: There is the suggestion both trees are placed in the middle of the garden. But for the Tree of Knowledge this is only suggested.
Step 2: Eve said to the serpent: God said of the tree in the middle of the garden it is forbidden to eat. This was misleading for only the Tree of Life was certainly placed in the midst of the garden. Would Eve have had the womanly intention to mislead the serpent? No, Eve was honest and only made an error, for it was quite permitted to eat from this Tree of Life in the midst of the garden. Also the serpent might have been honest if he thought it must have been the Tree of Life from which Eve thought it was forbidden to eat. And the serpent knew it was permitted. So he said the following which is correct for the Tree of Life:
4And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
But now there arises a problem. The next qualification belongs to the Tree of Knowledge and cannot be bound to the Tree of Life:
5For God doth know [God knows] that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Now it must be clear the Tree of Knowledge was meant. But what does Islam? Islam changed the Tree of Knowledge with the Tree of Life and also changed sentence 5:
5 [Islam: But Satan whispered to them to make apparent to them that which was concealed from them of their private parts. He said, "Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels OR become of the immortal."]
The rewriters of the myth - long before the Jewish scholars - have deliberately bound the effects of the Tree of Knowledge to the Tree of Life as an option. And that is exactly what happened with Islam again, where Adam ate from the tree of eternity and possession:
And we see Islam did not take over this phrase:
5For God doth know [God knows] that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
But invented something else:
5But Satan whispered to them to make apparent to them that which was concealed from them of their private parts. He said, "Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels OR become of the immortal."
That's why we must look better to the following:
https://quran.com/2/35
Notice, 'this' means that Islam does not identify the trees and correctly concludes both trees might have been in the middle of the garden as we showed above. Islam needed not to choose between the trees. Brilliant, and therefore they freely chose the Tree of Life.
And this last statement illustrates Islam as a hybrid religion.
The change of the Tree of Life
But there is another false effect where Islam without any reason attached a second reinforcer to the Tree of Life. It binds also 'power, kingdom and possession' to the Tree to divert attention from eternal life. Because eternal life would direct believers to earthly reincarnation what is not a good idea if this has to stay unconsciously.
Who has changed the myth?
Now it sometimes happens there is an error in the text. Then, why did the Jews not report and correct these errors? Maybe they wanted to remain authentic. And secondly, both errors are aligned into the same direction. So this must be deliberately misleading and that's why this version of the myth must be a joke invented by an earlier inbreeding and incest culture. And guess what, Islamic scholars likely found these old scripts in which these false bottoms were discussed. They must have used them for a second time...
In conclusion
Thousands of years ago one knew more about the origin of religion than we do today. They all knew about inbreeding and incest. They knew about genetic immortality and the connection of inbreeding with the earthly universe. But since Islam terrorizes the Arab peoples, knowledge has been suppressed into the unconsciousness of believers.
It is astonishing to see how Islam and Christianity draw the same conclusion from the Myth of Paradise. Both reject earthly reincarnation and choose for resurrection in Heaven of the parallel universe. Judaism did not belief in the parallel universe at all, only into a kind of massive rebirth of their people or not at all in the afterlife.
Another remarkable thing is both Christianity and Islam knew thousands of years ago women are for genetic diversity (Tree of Knowledge: adultery) and men for genetic monoculture (Tree of Life: inbreeding). What we have forgotten must have been well known in the evolution of Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc).
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
The Tree of Knowledge demonstrates the mental conflict women feel between their natural desire for genetic diversity versus unnatural genetic monoculture. Therefore in exogamous Christianity Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding, the Tree of Knowledge and in endogamous Islam Adam desired genetic monoculture and ate from the Tree of Inbreeding, the Tree of Life. Many thousand years ago people must have understand better what we have forgotten.
The Myth of Adam and Eve has been an initiation rite for young males for millions of years, which was transferred without spoken language from the darker abscesses of the human mind. It warned males for the lust of women (Eve) into males of foreign tribes (the Serpents), since in nature women guard genetic diversity. That's why Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding (The Tree of Knowledge) in the original version of the myth:
In the original myth of the Homoninae (7 Ma; 400cc) religion was 'genetic immortality in descendants'. After Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) religion changed into 'reincarnation into the earthly universe'.
It can be seen Judaism and Christianity paraphrased the original myth in which inbreeding was promoted and Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding (Tree of Knowledge). But Christianity gave a twist to the narrative and developed quite a new religion without inbreeding and incest.
After Homo sapiens (350 ka;1400cc) people invented the soul and resurrection into Heaven of the parallel universe. And that means always outbreeding in exogamy. Both Christianity and Islam originally meant to leave earthly inbreeding and incest and adhered outbreeding and exogamy in Heaven of the parallel universe.
Though Islam originally had good intentions like Christians, they messed up with inbreeding and incest from which they could not come off, since Muslims have an inbreeding instinct. That's the tragic of Islam, the tragic of the Muslim culture, because the mingling of two universes into one religion is a schizophrenic disaster for believers. One cannot believe in 'resurrection into the parallel universe' in the conscious and at the same time believe in 'reincarnation into the earthly universe' in the unconscious and remain intellectually sound and stable:
Notice, initially inbreeding was not promoted but condemned by Islam. Therefore, Islam had to change the narrative essentially and let Adam eat from his beloved Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life). So Islam definitely reversed the meaning of the Myth of Adam and Eve. Because Adam had fallen for genetic monoculture of the Tree of Life, he had to leave Paradise. Maybe he ever will ever be admitted into Heaven of the parallel universe at doomsday.
Both Christianity and Islam tried to lead their believers into Heaven of the parallel universe. Christianity succeeded to defeat inbreeding and incest. But Islam failed and merged with this former religion in a schizophrenic way. It must be said Christianity was only welcomed in already exogamous outbred cultures.
Remember Female Allah originally yearned to an exogamous parallel universe. It were Muslim males who messed up Heaven in the ego of Islamic culture:
Religion and ethnicity
Every culture finds its matching religion. Peoples and religions fit together. Muslims and Christians have different religions and are also completely different peoples. They will not assimilate without any of them giving up its religion.
There after, for Muslims it will take about 20 generations of forced outbreeding to lose their inbreeding instinct. This means a civil war seems unavoidable and much better the situation can be controlled fiercely without falsely supposing and claiming 'integration' by multiculturalism:
From the beginning we considered Islam as a hybrid religion with Inbreeding and Incest:
IMO 'inbreeding and incest' has become an instinct in humanlike creatures in the last 7 million years. Of course Christians emerged from the same species, but their instinct has been diluted by outbreeding with other exogamous peoples already many thousands of years ago.
The parallel universe
Before we proceed we must determine the status of the parallel universe in Genesis.
In the bible, 'angels' were accepted to exist and we decide them to belong to the parallel universe. Angels apparently could travel between the universes:
Assumption 180: Abraham and heaven. There is no heaven called in Genesis other than as ceiling of the earth. Also there is no mention of reincarnation into the earthly or into the parallel universe. And there is no evidence that Abraham, Isaac or God ever existed. But we do know the evolution of human religion follows logical laws. What means the level of abstraction of eternal life determines human religious development. Therefore, we interpret the myth of Abraham at best as the transition from earthly reincarnation to reincarnation into the parallel universe. The parallel universe is the final abstraction of eternal existence discovered by man.
But remember, the Tree of Life only promoted eternal life on Earth, not in the parallel universe:
Christianity fled from Inbreeding and Incest
A faction led by Jesus Christ seceded from Jewish monotheism and fled into polytheism, where it acknowledged 'other sexual roles' as subjects:
Christians tore themselves free from monotheistic sadism, but now their masochism lost direction in space, however. Masochism without sadism is meaningless. Therefore they constructed a new concept of evil as 'sin' in themselves. So they again found their second point in space to determine the direction of their masochistic lust. Christianity cannot survive without sadistic checkpoint, for which Islam invites itself in Western culture nowadays:
Anyway, they projected their religion orthogonal to inbreeding and incest and invented a completely new religion, in which evil was situated as sin into themselves.
At that time Christians very well understood the narrative of Adam and Eve. All of which we have forgotten. They knew it originally advocated 'genetic immortality in descendants' by inbreeding and incest. They also knew genetic immortality had been set aside by 'reincarnation into the earthly universe':
Operant response: inbreeding
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Both forms of religion were afraid of adulterous women like Eve who sought genetic diversity with the Serpent of another tribe and let men like Adam think the resulting child was his.
But Christians chose to reject and neglect inbreeding at all and focused only on Heaven in the parallel universe. So they projected a completely new religion orthogonal to the narrative. From the narrative they acknowledged the first version of the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc) in which young males as initiation rite were warned non verbally for the adulterous genetic lust to diversity of women. This means Christians followed the Jewish Script and let Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge what was seen as 'evil', a very abstract formulation of adultery.
In fact Christians constructed a double religious system: Firstly, sin versus guilt, and secondly the masochistic prayer versus his not existing inner God (sadism). Sin, guilt and God are the unknowns in these equations, this schizophrenic homo-erotic praying of Christians. It is an ingenious system and it works rather well and it is the better of the two religions. Thus, the system is intertwined:
Psychologically, Christianity first constructed 'guilt' which had to be punished and what generated their beloved masochism, what is a sexual lust. This guilt, which is the well known and hypothetical 'sin', would lead to a sadistic reaction of God, who would condemn and forbid Christians to enter Heaven of the parallel universe. Then Christians invented a Deus ex machina in the form of an identifiable and human like Super person, Jesus Christ, God alike, who gave a moralistic turn to guilt in that he took all guilt on his shoulders. This last part is 'displacement' of hypothetical guilt. Then, by the suffering of Christ they created 'sublimation' of the earthly paradise - from which they were banished - into Heaven of the parallel universe. Really, this is well conceived.
What we see is Christianity could not satisfy its masochistic lust without sadism and that's why they constructed 'sin' as evil. In our days Western peoples do not believe in Christianity any longer, but their masochistic lust must be relieved, and that's why policor (political correctness), former Christians, Marxists, socialists, left wingers and latent lesbian feminists are so fond of Islam, without realizing what drives them into Chrislam:
ISLAM
There is an abundance of indications which shows Islam as the continuation of Paradise culture of inbreeding and incest. That's no news:
More important is how Islam is connected to inbreeding in the earliest stages of building its religion. Did they alter the Myth of Paradise? They did. Was there any link with inbreeding? There was, very likely.
So, where did Islam change the narrative of Adam and Eve and how can this be explained by inbreeding and incest? It all started with the tree in the middle of the garden.
The tree in the middle of the garden
The Myth of Paradise is a joke with two false bottoms from which Islam benefited to change the Tree of Knowledge into the Tree of Life.
The first obvious bottom is the Tree of Knowledge, which would have been situated in the middle of the garden:
(Gen 2:9) And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
See Appendix.
But this sentence contains likely a false suggestion, not done by the Jews because the myth was well known in those days but millennia earlier by a previous culture of incest and inbreeding. Since from the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was placed.
-----------------------------
[The place of the tree of knowledge cannot be known by speech parsing. It might have been in the middle or at the border of the garden. Realize how easy it was to imply the tree of knowledge as follows: ]
And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life AND the tree of knowledge also in the midst of the garden.
[We conclude this is cunningly and intentionally so written by God. This must be misleading!]
But maybe they meant the following: the tree of life also in the midst of the garden,
But then it is incomprehensible that this is mistranslated for 2000 years:
9And the Lord God caused to sprout from the ground every tree pleasant to see and good to eat, and the Tree of Life in the midst of the garden, and the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil.
טוַיַּצְמַח יְהֹוָה אֱלֹהִים מִן הָאֲדָמָה כָּל עֵץ
נֶחְמָד לְמַרְאֶה וְטוֹב לְמַאֲכָל וְעֵץ הַחַיִּים בְּתוֹךְ
הַגָּן וְעֵץ הַדַּעַת טוֹב וָרָע:
| And…caused to sprout: Scripture speaks about the Garden. — [from Gen. Rabbah 13:1] | ויצמח: לענין הגן הכתוב מדבר: | |
| in the midst of the garden: i.e., in the middle of the Garden. — [from Targumim] | בתוך הגן: באמצע: |
The second double bottom is the statement of Eve in which God would have said 'of the tree in the middle of the garden should not be eaten':
3But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.]
This is definitely a wrong statement because God did not say that:
This is definitely a wrong statement because God did not say that:
-----------------------------
God said the following:
And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat.
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. [The tribe of inbreeding would 'die' by disintegration into outbreeding.]
This means the tree of life was not forbidden to eat of, it was the tree of knowledge from which the place is unknown. So Islam is wrong but they are not to blame for the error of judgement of Satan. Keep in mind Islam is going to change the trees.
What has been done so far? Because Eve was so stupid to appoint the tree in the middle of the garden, but not to mention God actually meant the tree of knowledge, extra degrees of freedom were created for Islam to give their own twist to the story.
-----------------------------
This is the discussion of Eve with the serpent. Beware, Islam changed sentence 5 by which it has nothing to do with the Tree of Knowledge anymore:
2And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
5For God doth know [do know] that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
5 [Islam: But Satan whispered to them to make apparent to them that which was concealed from them of their private parts. He said, "Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels OR become of the immortal."]
-----------------------------What has been done so far? Because Eve was so stupid to appoint the tree in the middle of the garden, but not to mention God actually meant the tree of knowledge, extra degrees of freedom were created for Islam to give their own twist to the story.
-----------------------------
This is the discussion of Eve with the serpent. Beware, Islam changed sentence 5 by which it has nothing to do with the Tree of Knowledge anymore:
[http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-3/
Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
2And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
4And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5For God doth know [do know] that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
I must say this is a brilliant move of the Koran and indeed the confusion has been founded by Eve in the Tanakh in the first place.
Step 1: There is the suggestion both trees are placed in the middle of the garden. But for the Tree of Knowledge this is only suggested.
Step 2: Eve said to the serpent: God said of the tree in the middle of the garden it is forbidden to eat. This was misleading for only the Tree of Life was certainly placed in the midst of the garden. Would Eve have had the womanly intention to mislead the serpent? No, Eve was honest and only made an error, for it was quite permitted to eat from this Tree of Life in the midst of the garden. Also the serpent might have been honest if he thought it must have been the Tree of Life from which Eve thought it was forbidden to eat. And the serpent knew it was permitted. So he said the following which is correct for the Tree of Life:
4And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
But now there arises a problem. The next qualification belongs to the Tree of Knowledge and cannot be bound to the Tree of Life:
5For God doth know [God knows] that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Now it must be clear the Tree of Knowledge was meant. But what does Islam? Islam changed the Tree of Knowledge with the Tree of Life and also changed sentence 5:
5 [Islam: But Satan whispered to them to make apparent to them that which was concealed from them of their private parts. He said, "Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels OR become of the immortal."]
The rewriters of the myth - long before the Jewish scholars - have deliberately bound the effects of the Tree of Knowledge to the Tree of Life as an option. And that is exactly what happened with Islam again, where Adam ate from the tree of eternity and possession:
(The Quran, Surat Taha [20:120])
Sahih International
Then Satan whispered to him; he said, "O Adam, shall I direct you to the tree of eternity and possession (power, kingdom) that will not deteriorate?"Notice, 'possession' correctly indicates the earthly universe, meaning this tree of eternity (living forever (sleep forever), genetic immortality in descendants, rebirth or earthly reincarnation) is wrong and leads not to eternal life in Heaven of the parallel universe:
And we see Islam did not take over this phrase:
5For God doth know [God knows] that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
But invented something else:
5But Satan whispered to them to make apparent to them that which was concealed from them of their private parts. He said, "Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels OR become of the immortal."
That's why we must look better to the following:
https://quran.com/2/35
https://quran.com/7:19
And We said, "O Adam, dwell, you and your wife, in Paradise and eat therefrom in [ease and] abundance from wherever you will. But do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers."Notice, 'this' means that Islam does not identify the trees and correctly concludes both trees might have been in the middle of the garden as we showed above. Islam needed not to choose between the trees. Brilliant, and therefore they freely chose the Tree of Life.
But Satan whispered to them to make apparent to them that which was concealed from them of their private parts. He said, "Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels OR become of the immortal."
Notice, Islam easily chose for the tree of life, because Eve 'forgot' to say the tree of knowledge was meant. So Satan was right since the tree in the middle of the garden, the tree of life, was not forbidden.
Satan deliberately forgot to say about 5For God doth know 'knowing good and evil', so Muslim believers did not grasp the trick of changing the trees. Also Satan knew very well that Adam was allowed to eat from every tree in the garden, except from the Tree of Knowledge, so the Tree of Life was not forbidden.
So, completely against the story line Islam associates 'this' to the Tree of Life.
And Satan found more confusion stuff because 'angels' refer to the parallel universe but 'immortal' might also refer to older versions of the myth as 'genetic immortality in descendants' or 'reincarnation into the earthly universe'. If Islam meant the Tree of Life belonged to the parallel universe then Satan would have stated the following:
Notice, Islam easily chose for the tree of life, because Eve 'forgot' to say the tree of knowledge was meant. So Satan was right since the tree in the middle of the garden, the tree of life, was not forbidden.
Satan deliberately forgot to say about 5For God doth know 'knowing good and evil', so Muslim believers did not grasp the trick of changing the trees. Also Satan knew very well that Adam was allowed to eat from every tree in the garden, except from the Tree of Knowledge, so the Tree of Life was not forbidden.
So, completely against the story line Islam associates 'this' to the Tree of Life.
And Satan found more confusion stuff because 'angels' refer to the parallel universe but 'immortal' might also refer to older versions of the myth as 'genetic immortality in descendants' or 'reincarnation into the earthly universe'. If Islam meant the Tree of Life belonged to the parallel universe then Satan would have stated the following:
"Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels AND become of the immortal."
So Islam is misleading her believers and takes deliberate a dualistic position on the Tree of Life: it could refer to earthly or heavenly reincarnation. It is the prelude to choose for earthly reincarnation (Inbreeding and incest). So the Tree of Life is degraded to earthly reincarnation, where Islam apparently knew it had the choice also to reincarnation into the parallel universe (angels). And who chooses for earthly reincarnation does not come into Heaven of the parallel universe and must leave Camp Paradise.
But now we should not be too difficult and accept that the Tree of Life really meant earthly eternal life under all circumstances. So, skip the discussion above. Then 'reincarnation into the parallel universe' was excluded from the Tree of Life. The Tree of Life describes the old situation until the advent of Homo sapiens (200 ka; 1400cc) who discovered the parallel universe:
Only if we speak metaphorically about the heavenly paradise, or paradise in Heaven, only then we use this image:
But now Islam got the task of binding the inbreeding instinct to 'reincarnation into the parallel universe', which went completely wrong because both universes are competing reinforcers, as has been explained extensively on this site:
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring'
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Tertiary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the parallel universe
Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
So Islam is misleading her believers and takes deliberate a dualistic position on the Tree of Life: it could refer to earthly or heavenly reincarnation. It is the prelude to choose for earthly reincarnation (Inbreeding and incest). So the Tree of Life is degraded to earthly reincarnation, where Islam apparently knew it had the choice also to reincarnation into the parallel universe (angels). And who chooses for earthly reincarnation does not come into Heaven of the parallel universe and must leave Camp Paradise.
But now we should not be too difficult and accept that the Tree of Life really meant earthly eternal life under all circumstances. So, skip the discussion above. Then 'reincarnation into the parallel universe' was excluded from the Tree of Life. The Tree of Life describes the old situation until the advent of Homo sapiens (200 ka; 1400cc) who discovered the parallel universe:
Only if we speak metaphorically about the heavenly paradise, or paradise in Heaven, only then we use this image:
But now Islam got the task of binding the inbreeding instinct to 'reincarnation into the parallel universe', which went completely wrong because both universes are competing reinforcers, as has been explained extensively on this site:
Operant response: inbreeding
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Operant response: inbreeding
Tertiary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the parallel universe
Operant response: inbreeding
Concurrent reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Concurrent reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the parallel universe
Concurrent reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the parallel universe
And this last statement illustrates Islam as a hybrid religion.
The change of the Tree of Life
The Quran rejected inbreeding by means of the Tree of Life.
Then Satan whispered to him; he said, "O Adam, shall I direct you to the tree of eternity and possession (power, kingdom) that will not deteriorate?"
Notice, 'possession' correctly indicates the earthly universe, meaning this tree of eternity (living forever (sleep forever), genetic immortality in descendants, rebirth or earthly reincarnation) is wrong and leads not to eternal life in Heaven of the parallel universe:
(The Quran, Surat Taha [20:120])
Sahih International
Then Satan whispered to him; he said, "O Adam, shall I direct you to the tree of eternity and possession (power, kingdom) that will not deteriorate?"
Notice, 'possession' correctly indicates the earthly universe, meaning this tree of eternity (living forever (sleep forever), genetic immortality in descendants, rebirth or earthly reincarnation) is wrong and leads not to eternal life in Heaven of the parallel universe:
But there is another false effect where Islam without any reason attached a second reinforcer to the Tree of Life. It binds also 'power, kingdom and possession' to the Tree to divert attention from eternal life. Because eternal life would direct believers to earthly reincarnation what is not a good idea if this has to stay unconsciously.
Who has changed the myth?
Now it sometimes happens there is an error in the text. Then, why did the Jews not report and correct these errors? Maybe they wanted to remain authentic. And secondly, both errors are aligned into the same direction. So this must be deliberately misleading and that's why this version of the myth must be a joke invented by an earlier inbreeding and incest culture. And guess what, Islamic scholars likely found these old scripts in which these false bottoms were discussed. They must have used them for a second time...
In conclusion
Thousands of years ago one knew more about the origin of religion than we do today. They all knew about inbreeding and incest. They knew about genetic immortality and the connection of inbreeding with the earthly universe. But since Islam terrorizes the Arab peoples, knowledge has been suppressed into the unconsciousness of believers.
It is astonishing to see how Islam and Christianity draw the same conclusion from the Myth of Paradise. Both reject earthly reincarnation and choose for resurrection in Heaven of the parallel universe. Judaism did not belief in the parallel universe at all, only into a kind of massive rebirth of their people or not at all in the afterlife.
Another remarkable thing is both Christianity and Islam knew thousands of years ago women are for genetic diversity (Tree of Knowledge: adultery) and men for genetic monoculture (Tree of Life: inbreeding). What we have forgotten must have been well known in the evolution of Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc).
It makes no sense to rewrite the Koran into a lighter and more civilized version, since that is not the problem. The problem is the schizophrenia to combine two contrary beliefs into one book. It would help if the Muslim youth would not be indoctrinated any longer with Islam, but then they fall back to inbreeding and incest which can already be seen in religious endogamy.
But there is still another option. Muslims by themselves could be more willing to analyze their psychological state in relation to their enforced way of magical thinking. This because the frictions within this hybrid religion are given form by absurd magical thinking.
Anyway Muslims will once realize they are on the wrong track with poisoning their youth. Islam will die out because of the impossibility to maintain this religion. In name they will continue to call themselves Islam but in fact they are already turning to inbreeding and incest. This culture will flood Western Europe, but it can be kept under control with legislation.
Appendix
Speech parsing 'middle of the garden'
What meant the Jewish text on the location of the Tree of Knowledge actually in speech parsing? From the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was situated.
It can be concluded that the 'garden' or the 'middle of the garden' can amount to the same thing. Therefore it is likely that the Hebrew text also uses the tree of life in the midst of the garden. But...this is not mandatory for the tree of knowledge. From the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was situated.
Attachment 2:
Next, we find the ultimate agreement between sexuality and religion in the yellow area in the middle as the sex-religion factor. This is referred to as convergence. But as a Gestalt, it is more than the parts.
.jpg)
But there is still another option. Muslims by themselves could be more willing to analyze their psychological state in relation to their enforced way of magical thinking. This because the frictions within this hybrid religion are given form by absurd magical thinking.
Anyway Muslims will once realize they are on the wrong track with poisoning their youth. Islam will die out because of the impossibility to maintain this religion. In name they will continue to call themselves Islam but in fact they are already turning to inbreeding and incest. This culture will flood Western Europe, but it can be kept under control with legislation.
Appendix
Speech parsing 'middle of the garden'
What meant the Jewish text on the location of the Tree of Knowledge actually in speech parsing? From the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was situated.
9(Gen 2:9) And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
(Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads
(Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads
ט. וַיַּצְמַח יְהֹוָה אֱלֹהִים מִןהָאֲדָמָה כָּלעֵץ נֶחְמָד לְמַרְאֶה וְטוֹב לְמַאֲכָל וְעֵץ הַחַיִּים בְּתוֹךְ הַגָּן וְעֵץ הַדַּעַת טוֹב וָרָע:
Heere God Jehova en groeien . negende (<< leesrichting eerste regel)
en goed bij leuk bomen van grond
boom tuin van het leven boom voedsel
:kwaad goed van kennis
T.. En de HEERE God had alle geboomte groeien uit de aarde en lekker eten in (het midden van) de tuin van de Boom des Levens en de Boom van Kennis (goed kwaad):
(וְעֵץ הַחַיִּים בְּתוֹךְ = boom van het leven)
(וְעֵץ הַדַּעַת= boom van kennis)
(וְעֵץ = boom = כָּלעֵץ)
(הַגָּן = tuin)
(טוֹב = goed)
(וָרָע = kwaad)
( לְמַאֲכָל= voedsel)
(וְטוֹב = en goed)
(לְמַרְאֶה = bij)
( נֶחְמָד= leuk)
( מִןהָאֲדָמָה= van grond)
(אֱלֹהִים = HEERE God)
( וַיַּצְמַח= en groeien)
( יְהֹוָה = Jehova)
( ט.= negende)
(midden =עצמאמ = לבז )
(hof = ףוחה)
(בְּתוֹךְ הַגָּן = (in het midden van) de tuin)
(midden van de hof = ףוה / ןאו / הפשא תומרע)
(midden van de hof = hof / van / midden)
(centrum = זכרמה)
(grond = הָאֲדָמָה)
(van = מִן)
T.. En de HEERE God had alle geboomte groeien uit de aarde en lekker eten in de tuin van de Boom des Levens en de Boom van Kennis:
T.. And the LORD God to grow every tree from the earth and good food in the garden the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge:
T.. Et l'Éternel Dieu à croître chaque arbre de la terre et de la bonne nourriture dans le jardin de l'Arbre de Vie et l'Arbre de la Connaissance:
Vertaal van Nederlands naar Hebreeuws
Om ons argument te checken voeren wij de Nederlandse tekst in en bekijken de Hebreeuwse spelling:
(Gen 3:3) Maar van de vruchten van de boom, die in het midden van de tuin staat, heeft God gezegd. Daar mag je niet van eten, je mag er ook niet aankomen, anders ga je dood.
אבל פרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן, אמר אלהים. מכיוון שאתה לא יכול לאכול, אתה גם לא צריך להגיע, אחרת תמות.
(בתוך הגן = midden van de tuin)
(הַגָּן = tuin)
(בתוך = in)
Geconcludeerd mag worden dat ‘de tuin’ of in het ‘midden van de tuin’ op hetzelfde kan neerkomen. Daarom is het aannemelijk dat ook de Hebreeuwse tekst uitgaat van de boom des levens in het midden van de tuin. Maar…dit geldt niet dwingend voor de boom der kennis.
[It can be concluded that the 'garden' or the 'middle of the garden' can amount to the same thing. Therefore it is likely that the Hebrew text also uses the tree of life in the midst of the garden. But...this is not mandatory for the tree of knowledge.]
[It can be concluded that the 'garden' or the 'middle of the garden' can amount to the same thing. Therefore it is likely that the Hebrew text also uses the tree of life in the midst of the garden. But...this is not mandatory for the tree of knowledge.]
En dit maakt het NBG (Nederlands Bijbelgenootschap 1979) ervan:
(Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, BENEVENS de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads.
In gangbaar Nederlands:
(A) (Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads.
[Staat hier soms het volgende:]
[Staat hier soms het volgende:]
(B) (Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF .
[Of kan dit ook bedoeld zijn]
[Of kan dit ook bedoeld zijn]
(C) (Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads AAN DE RAND VAN DEN HOF.
It can be concluded that the 'garden' or the 'middle of the garden' can amount to the same thing. Therefore it is likely that the Hebrew text also uses the tree of life in the midst of the garden. But...this is not mandatory for the tree of knowledge. From the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was situated.
----------------------------
Explanation table Convergence Theory
Next explanation is outdated, since new insight learned the following:
To recapitulate I must confess to an interpretation error in my first version of the Paradise model. Progressive insight learned that there is no 'means - goal' relation between the trees.
Anyway, here is the attachment:
Next explanation is outdated, since new insight learned the following:
Anyway, here is the attachment:
First of all, note that in this analysis, there is a stepped effect: The first effect is the genetic immortality of men (brown numbers 2,3,4), which is expressed in the number of descendants by the prohibition of adultery. A quantity attribute.
In addition comes an inbreeding effect. It is the purification of the family genes
(yellow 5,6). This relates to the nature of the descendants. A quality feature.
Here we place the origin of the paradise story to the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc). The yellow area is the sex-religion factor in the mind of men. Here, the first thoughts about sexuality and immortality in his unconscious came together. It is the primal dimension of sexual religiosity. All other human ethics - as is assumed here - emerged from this ground dimension of ethics.
Metaphor: Eating the good (inbreeding) from the tree of knowledge will give earthly immortality of the gene pool of the man in his own tribe. But who eats from evil (outbreeding) will remain mortal, meaning his genes will spread over all other tribes, so he loses tribal identity. Then the tribe will die as group identity.
Next, we find the ultimate agreement between sexuality and religion in the yellow area in the middle as the sex-religion factor. This is referred to as convergence. But as a Gestalt, it is more than the parts.
There arises something new, an inbreeding factor. This was not expected in the analysis but resulted as an inevitable consequence of the technique chosen. The factor was found by the methodological principle that quantity (number of offspring) mostly is accompanied by quality (saturated inbreeding).
Literally: Who lets his wife not commit adultery will acquire earthly immortality. His genes will live on into her children. But who lets her commit adultery will possibly die out in the genes of her children.
Of course there is more which is associated with adultery, as the wounded pride and honor of the man. These feelings come together on the sex-religion factor as well as sexual lust. All these feelings are an additional basis for stoning. However, they do not contribute to a full explanation of paradise story. Therefore adultery is only an inadequate interpretation of this narrative. But along with genetic immortality and inbreeding there is a complete fit.
Adultery, woman's ultimate weapon
Adultery, woman's ultimate weapon
Deep in the unconscious of every man lurks the fear of the sexual power of women. Sexuality is the only instinct on which he has virtually no control. A woman as the bearer of life handles sexuality more naturally. She can admit anybody to her lap. For example if she commits adultery with the Serpent and gives the child as its fruit to Adam. When Adam acknowledges this child it makes himself guilty of ignorance. Therefore, Adam had to take advance measures against adultery.
Paradise story was an initiation rite
Paradise story was likely part of an initiation rite. Many thousands of years it passed from father to son at the time of his maturity. It was so functional in the archetypal sense that it passed the ravages of time. The importance of the story was the survival of the family, living in paradise, the place where the son grew up. The warning of the father concerned the sexual desires of the woman.
Her power as carrier of life was the mortality of his family. She could admit anyone to her lap. Thereby were her sexual desires a threat to the survival of the gene pool of the father.
Her power as carrier of life was the mortality of his family. She could admit anyone to her lap. Thereby were her sexual desires a threat to the survival of the gene pool of the father.
She had the power to block the transfer of his son's genes into her children. This allowed the father family could literally die out. This is the key to paradise story. It is this mortality phobia within the paradise story which the father became an obsession. He threatened his son even with expulsion from the family and the expulsion from paradise in which he was reared. This, if he were unable to restrain the desires of his wife.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment