.png)
Basic Dimension
.png)
Preface: Evolution of Religion:
.png)
.png)
.png)
This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:
.png)
What the Paradise story really means in the animal world:
It is a ritual to warn young males of the adulterous behavior of females, to prevent foreign male DNA from entering the male bloodline of the tribe. For example, Adam was instructed to prevent Eve from mating with the Serpent from another tribe and not to accept their child, the Apple, as his child:
.png)
But one step further back in the animal world and beyond animals that live in groups, we see the myth as a male sexual instinct to avoid strange offspring in females.
So the paradise story is actually a primal sexual instinct in the animal world to protect the integrity of species. Where subspecies can be mixed, the Paradise myth comes into effect... Well, how about bipedal primates?
.png)
.png)
The desire for outbreeding is only limited where mixing of species is not possible. And where subspecies can be mixed, the Paradise myth comes into effect to protect the male bloodline, just like chimpanzees:
Like Homo erectus only absorbed female DNA from Homo naledi and Homo sapiens only extracted the female genome from Homo Neanderthalensis, protecting the male bloodline, while they also liked females better, btw.:
.png)
This all means that the paradise story is the thermometer of the religious = sexual evolution of bipedal primates:
.png)
That's why this myth changed with the evolution from inbreeding to outbreeding cultures and vice versa, in which inbreeding protects the male bloodline:
.png)
The Tree of Life is the Tree of Inbreeding
When we realize that the Tree of Life in bipedal evolution has always been the Tree of Inbreeding and that the Tree of Knowledge was the Tree of Knowledge of autosomal disorders since Homo sapiens (Mount Toba), then inbreeding religions always
removed the Tree of Knowledge from the Garden of Paradise:
Conversely, outbreeding religions will remove the Tree of Life.
.png)
.jpg)
Evolution of the Paradise Myth:
Red arrows point to the Tree of Life and pink to the Tree of Knowledge:
.png)
Connections and transitions:
The start configuration of the Myth of Paradise
Assumptions:
1: The prerequisite for myths in which both sexes play a role (Eve & Serpent) is always an underlying sexual instinct. This goes back to bipedal primates:
.png)
SM-dyad is the underlying Sexual Instinct (SI) of Vanilla-dyad.
Vanilla-dyad is a cultural aberration of SM-dyad which is a Sexual Instinct (SI):
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
2: Sexual instincts are always connected to the birth process. This goes back to the animal world:
.png)
This means that since Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), reincarnation is a magical sexual instinct because it depends on breeding:
.png)
.png)
.png)
While resurrection from (Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc)) is just a meaningless word:
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
3: For bipedal primates we have the additional assumption that outbreeding as primal sexual instinct of animals was regularly replaced by inbreeding more than 15 million years ago. This due to circumstances where females from other tribes were not always available:
.png)
This means that bipedal primates developed a sexual conflict by forced to choose between inbreeding and outbreeding for reproduction.
There are two more assumptions underlying the Genesis analysis:
4: Enforcing and sanctioning female sexuality is another word for 'religion'. That's why inbreeding and outbreeding became religions:
.png)
.png)
We have now formulated the basic form of human sexuality, which enables us to assess sexual myths from humans. Then, Genesis shows the fight between the ancient bipedal inbreeding instinct and the desired outbreeding of Desert Religions.
.png)
5) Further, Desert Religions tried to prevent reincarnation through inbreeding by replacing the afterlife with resurrection in heaven (outbreeding). As follows:
.png)
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, all sought to prevent 'reincarnation by inbreeding'
through the promise of outbreeding (Muslims) or asexuality (Christians) in heaven.
.png)
Jewish scholars forced the bipedal 'God of Inbreeding' to outbreeding from Homo sapiens with a clever trick:
.png)
And Muslim scholars made Adam eat from the 'forbidden' Tree of Life:
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
We concluded earlier:
The Paradise Myth is not about the sexual relationship between Adam and Eve, as Desert Religions would have us believe, that is deception. The problem lies in Eve's relationship with another man, the Serpent, from another tribe: outbreeding. And now we're getting somewhere:
What the Paradise story really means in the animal world:
It is a ritual to warn young males of the adulterous behavior of females, to prevent foreign male DNA from entering the male bloodline of the tribe. For example, Adam was instructed to prevent Eve from mating with the Serpent from another tribe and not to accept their child, the Apple, as his child.
But one step further back in the animal world and beyond animals that live in groups, we see the myth as a male sexual instinct to avoid strange offspring in females.
So the paradise story is actually a primal sexual instinct in the animal world to protect the integrity of species. Where subspecies can be mixed, the Paradise myth comes into effect...
Because we believe that we can derive the paradise myth from a sexual instinct in the animal world, we conclude that an outcrossing culture such as Judaism probably changed the paradise myth by moving the trees in the garden:
3: In Genesis, Jewish scientists forced the bipedal 'God of inbreeding' to outbreeding like Homo sapiens with a clever trick. Eve was confused about the location of the Tree of Knowledge, which was definitely not in the center of the garden.
And Islam denies the Tree of Life (Tree of Inbreeding) because it was not forbidden to eat from it, while they made the Serpent say that it was so:
4: Islam also confused the Tree of Life (Tree of Inbreeding) with the Tree of Knowledge (Tree of Outbreeding). They said that Adam was forbidden to eat from the Tree of Inbreeding, which was a lie, but then they refused to let Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge because that would give a woman the honor of Outbreeding.
But I think Desert Religions stuck with reincarnation of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).That's why they came up with resurrection in heaven, where DNA of believers was completely repaired. Notice that this was absolutely not the case with reincarnation.
Desert religions thus no longer returned to the oldest paradise myth of Australopithecus, where the Tree of Life protected the tribe as an institution and individuals would die. They had already passed on to eternal life on earth via reincarnation through inbreeding, but now tried to convert this into resurrection without a birth process and therefore without inbreeding.
If our premise is true, we can now map first Genesis (Art 432) and then all of evolution in this regard.
.png)
THE SPLIT IN DESERT RELIGIONS
Desert religions all had the same goal: to eliminate the Tree of Life without the believers knowing:
They did not talk about 'reincarnation' because this was a sexual instinct of believers conditioned on the earthly afterlife. They abhorred worshiping idols that just indicated reincarnation. And so they changed 'reincarnation' into 'pagan polytheism' and 'resurrection' into 'worshiping the only God in heaven (monotheism)':
.png)
.png)
.png)
We know from the previous article (432) the struggle of Jewish scholars to have the Tree of Knowledge of Autosomal Disorders replace the Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life).
Also that Islam wrongly considers the Tree of Life as not for eating.
And Christianity totally neglects the Myth of Paradise and invents a whole new myth completely separate from inbreeding.
.jpg)
Christianity and Islam are the extreme poles on sado-masochism, where Judaism is closer to Christianity because both are matriarchal and polytheistic. Islam is monotheistic and sadistic:
.jpg)
Northern European peoples who embraced Christianity did not practice systematic inbreeding like the Pre-Muslim culture. They are outbreeding cultures based on polytheism and masochism.
But Islam emerged from its previous inbred population, in which inbreeding (cousin marriages) as an autosomal recessive disorder still has its grip on Islam:
.png)
Judaism was and is a matriarchy on a polytheistic basis because women have free sexual choice to protect the female bloodline (mt-DNA). But although Judaism did not practice systematic inbreeding 3500 years ago, the culture did suffer from all kinds of incest:
.jpg)
Islam was unable to separate the two constituent religious cultures and developed into a hybrid religion with cognitive dissonance between reincarnation (unconscious) and resurrection (conscious).
.jpg)
.jpg)
Reformulated:
What really happened with Desert Religions in their interpretation of the Myth of Paradise
Most interestingly, Christianity (outbreeding) kept the Jewish paradise story intact (Eve chose for the Tree of Knowledge), but later gave sinners eternal life in Heaven of the parallel universe through the suffering of Christ. Notice, they used an orthogonal transformation to let heaven (asexuality) not be compromised by the Myth of Paradise (inbreeding):
Most interestingly, Christianity (outbreeding) kept the Jewish paradise story intact (Eve chose for the Tree of Knowledge), but later gave sinners eternal life in Heaven of the parallel universe through the suffering of Christ. Notice, they used an orthogonal transformation to let heaven (asexuality) not be compromised by the Myth of Paradise (inbreeding):
.jpg)
Orthogonalization was easy for Christianity because North European Peoples, who embraced Christianity, were already outbred populations, without the strong inbreeding instinct from Pre-Muslims.
Allah rejected the Tree of Life as form of earthly reincarnation and wealth and threw Adam, Muslim males, out of paradise. So, Allah formally disconnected earthly inbreeding from Heaven. And so Islam thought to use an orthogonal transformation. But it was only an academic and artificial solution for Islam:
.jpg)
.jpg)
Islam unrealistically tried to eliminate reincarnation and replace it with outbreeding in heaven. But they failed to close the loop, because reincarnation is an inherited and powerful sexual instinct that Muslim males cannot turn off, and Islamic scholars were therefore left with a mess of oblique transformations between two highly correlated universes:
.jpg)
In the Koran, Satan tempted Adam to eat from the Tree of Physical Immortality (Tree of Life) to live forever in the earthly universe as a rich man. But he could otherwise have received eternal life in heaven of the parallel universe if he had not eaten from that tree. Therefore, Adam did not obtain eternal life in heaven:
But by expelling Muslim males from heaven, Islam de facto created female Allah, identical to the Christian God, whose masculine role was later taken over by 'female' Jesus:
.jpg)
.jpg)
(121) Blood and organ donations in hybrid Islam
Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2 from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] .The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law.
Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2 from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] .The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law.
Resurrection of Jesus:
The resurrection story appears in more than five locations in the Bible. In several episodes in the Four Gospels Jesus foretells his coming death and resurrection, which he states is the plan of God the Father.[24] Christians view the resurrection of Jesus as part of the plan of salvation and redemption by atonement for man's sin.[25] Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2, from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law. The Pharisees, whose views became Rabbinic Judaism, eventually won (or at least survived) this debate. The promise of a future resurrection appears in the Torah as well as in certain Jewish works, such as the Life of Adam and Eve, c 100 BC, and the Pharisaic book 2 Maccabees, c124 BC.[27]
However, 1st century Judaism had no conception of a single individual rising from the dead in the middle of history. The historical Jewish concept of resurrection was that of a redemption of the whole people.[28] Their concept was always that everybody [sleeping forever, BD] would be raised together at the end of time [Rebirth, BD]. So the idea of one individual rising in the middle of history was foreign to them.[29]
------------------------------------
Resurrection in desert religions:
https://islamqa.info/en/10769
https://islamqa.info/en/10769
107690: Ruling on organ donation
In the answer to question no. 49711 we stated that the (scholarly) view that it is permissible to donate organs is most likely to be the correct view, so long as the donation will not lead to the death of the donor.
http://www.questionsonislam.com/article/organ-transplantation
Resurrection and sins committed with that organ.
The majority of ahl as-sunnah scholars and Islamic theologians think that resurrection is going to be physical in the hereafter and human beings are going to be resurrected with their souls and bodies, called to account and be rewarded or punished. The Koranic verses seem to support this view (see Ta Ha 20:55, al-Hajj 22:5, 7; al-Nur 24:20, Ya Sin 36:78-79, al-Qiyamah 75:34). The fact that resurrection is going to be physical (with body) plays a role – partly though – on people’s hesitation about organ transplantation. However, when the issue is examined deeply, it is seen that organ transplantation is not directly related to resurrection; or more properly that organ transplantation has got nothing to harm the belief of resurrection because the transplanted organ is going to be returned to its real owner. Actually, it does not prevent organs to be resurrected with their real owners even though they decayed under soil, burnt to ashes, or eaten by animals. As a matter of fact, the Koran states that one’s organs are going to be gathered together with the slightest details in the hereafter (al-Qiyamah 75:34). Islamic scholars, judging from this proof and the likes, have concluded that everyone is going to be resurrected with their own organs.
BD: Resurrection of the own body - with or without soul - must be seen as rebirth. This, because the soul is not essential for rebirth, only the revival of the body counts. Islam needs no soul. 'Rebirth with a soul' is a regression to the animal state of 'rebirth without soul'.
------------------------------------
Another remarkable thing is both Christianity and Islam knew thousands of years ago women are for genetic diversity (Tree of Knowledge: adultery) and men for genetic monoculture (Tree of Life: inbreeding). What we have forgotten must have been well known since the evolution of Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc).
And now you will better understand that Islam basically wanted the same as Christianity. God and Allah really were meant the same Gods in the parallel universe. Both are female gods reflecting the inner life of women:
Eve: Yet, O Adam, in my wildest dreams, while I serve thee and thou whip my body as Satan the whores in hell I find shelter in God's spiritual love. When thou strangling, force me to open up the eyes on thy decisive time, they stare wide open and seeing blind, drowning in cloudy ponds, inward to the creator. The three of us reach paradise of heavenly joy of unbridled euphoria and insatiable happiness. My God, my complementary love, my savior in this earthly vale of tears. He gives me the happiness that thou hast not yet opened. My greatest treasure I wanted to give thee. But thou, O Adam, are already satisfied with my perishable body.
.png)
Superior and inferior religions
From our analysis of the deeper motivations of Desert Religions, we draw the conclusion that the Tree of Knowledge is the wild card, the bargaining chip in alternating cultures. Alternations between inbreeding and outbreeding, which can last a maximum of about 5000 years and which in the meantime produces a myriad of branches of mixed cultures:
Superior and inferior religions
Homo naledi and Islam have superior religions caused by inbreeding. These religions are mostly monotheistic in nature (God of Darkness, Allah):
Super religions (superior religions) are monotheistic inbreeding religions inherited from the first bipedal primates. They are innate for human males. But over time, a polytheistic variant, called inferior religions, develops based on the earlier and primal sexual instinct of all animals: polytheism, genetic diversity, outbreeding or outcrossing.
.png)
Monotheism and polytheism alternate in the evolution. But the bipedal inbreeding instinct is the strongest and takes the lead every time:
.png)
Inbreeding is also accompanied by SM-dyad (strong, woman as object) , which is a sexual instinct, while polytheism is based on SM-dyad (weak, woman as subject) as in the animal kingdom:
.png)
With this theory we now rearrange bipedal evolution in its alternation between superior and inferior religions:
Evolution of bipedal religious concepts:
.png)
Evolution of the Paradise Myth:
First the total timeline in two schemes:
Red arrows point to the Tree of Life and pink to the Tree of Knowledge:
.png)
Next we will discuss evolutionary phases in succession, showing first each phase with 3 schemes from start to final analysis:
First phase: chimpanzees:
1: Creation of chimpanzee religion: Outbreeding.
.png)
3 schemes from start to final analysis:
.png)
Chimpanzees have an inbred male population that becomes outbred by imported females from other tribes. They need both the Tree of Life (males) and the Tree of Knowledge (females) in the middle of the garden.
.png)
Male chimps are a collection of would be Alpha males, which form a male kin bonded lineage over many generations. Where a single Alpha male only practices inbreeding in his strongest years, here the entire clan is permanently guilty of inbreeding in the male bloodline. So, no foreign male DNA (from the Serpent) enters the clan.
It must be said that among chimpanzees it is not immediately the strongest male which is at top, but the male which best reflects the moral values of the group. Sometimes a physically inferior male is the alpha male (see Frans de Waal). But I expect that things will be less civilized with baboons.
In male kin bonded chimpanzee tribes, by definition, females come from other tribes and therefore have different nuclear-DNA. That's why these male inbreeding cultures eventually turn out to be outbred. And because female adultery (XX) with strange males (XY) from other tribes is not allowed, there is not much contaminated male chromosome (XY) in the offspring.
.png)
Note that the original initiation ritual, the Myth of Paradise for chimpanzees living in groups is a construction with out-of-tribe-born females. A myth, understandably without speech and inscription.
The myth of paradise was made clear without speech and was not passed on orally until bipedal primates learned to speak. Millions of years later, with Homo sapiens, the spoken word was written on clay tablets and then syntactic and semantic ambiguity about the exact location of the Tree of Knowledge, inside or outside the Garden, was implemented into the myth. We see this today in Jewish and Muslim Genesis.
An ambiguity very unlikely did not occur in spoken narratives, where outbred populations simply ignored the Tree of Life. And so we are able to imagine the trail of transition from inbreeding religions to outbreeding religions, concluded from confusion about where the Tree of Knowledge must have stood among different religions in evolution.
In summary: Only because young females (XX) leave the tribe when they reach adulthood and look for other groups, the end result for chimps is outbreeding (XY). Thus, male chimpanzees have the male consanguinity and live in the same tree for generations. And because females are naturally prone to adultery (Eve = outcrossing), males daily check the perimeter of their territory for alien male DNA (the Serpent), which are always brutally killed or eaten alive.
.png)
Genetic immortality: religion of the animal world:
In the animal world of the Alpha male, Genetic Immortality means that individuals will die, but their genes, their DNA, will live on in the Tree of Life, the Tree of Inbreeding, meaning eternal survival of the tribe, the male kin line, but not of the individual, which dies or sleeps forever.
And because females convert inbreeding into outbreeding, the Tree of Inbreeding
does not actually exist for herd animals and should actually be called the Tree of Outbreeding, as for solitary animals, which usually mate in pairs:
.png)
It should already be noted that the Tree of Life can exist only in real inbreeding cultures of bipedal primates. Animals cannot survive long-term inbreeding and their net effect will always be outbreeding, otherwise they will become extinct.
Later we will see that Judaism from Desert Religions (but not Islam) still used the original Tree of Life of inbreeding cultures to accommodate believers, although they eventually tried to lead them towards outbreeding, eventually by placing the Tree of Knowledge in the center of the garden. And the Koran clearly rejects the Tree of Life. Desert religions have ruined the whole myth, as will become clear later, which gives us the freedom to change this myth as we see fit in evolution.
Second phase: bipedal primates:
2: Creation of bipedal religion: Inbreeding.
.png)
Again 3 schemes from start to final analysis:
.png)
.png)
.png)
The original bipedal primate culture was based on inbreeding, just like chimps. In this religion: genetic immortality meant that individuals would die but their genes, their DNA would live on in the Tree of Life, the Tree of Inbreeding meaning eternal survival of the tribe, the male kin line, but not of individuals. This all because the first bipedal primates were causal and natural thinkers, averse to reincarnation and more of that nonsense as the soul caused by the enlarged psychotic brain of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
Bipedal meant a totally redesigned body and gait:
.png)
.png)
The problem with bipeds was that they never numbered more than 26,000 individuals in the entire world up to and including Homo erectus (2 Mya; 900cc), and disappeared in all directions at the horizon and therefore had great difficulty meeting their own kind.
Even if they wanted to, it was very difficult to exchange young females with other groups. And so they often had no choice but to mate within their own group (severe inbreeding), meaning they plowed female DNA back into the male bloodline.
.png)
.png)
This unlike outbreeding chimpanzees. But like chimpanzees, they had very diverse DNA and were much more resistant to autosomal recessive disorders than later Homo sapiens:
.png)
Religion is a way of controlling sexual behavior over females, which is why forced inbreeding over millions of years led to the first bipedal religion: inbreeding, which is still inherited in the genes of a large part of the Muslim population in Pakistan and Iran.
Bipedal religion is an interplay between inbreeding (superior religions) and outbreeding (inferior religions)
.png)
The changing Paradise Myth for bipeds:
In the times of the first Hominins (14-7 Mya; 300cc) religion was still Genetic Immortality as with chimps, where individuals died.
And in bipedal evolution, where inbreeding replaced outbreeding and vice versa,
the Paradise Myth changed with religion.
In this myth, the Tree of Life expressed tribes eternal earthly survival as inbreeding cult, as inbreeding institution. And with the Tree of Knowledge they disapproved
outbreeding, which was therefore psychologically placed outside the garden.
.jpg)
As a matter of fact, DNA from bipedal primate females (XX) was often plowed back into the male kin line ("cousin marriages"), simply because the group encountered no other groups to exchange females. When this sexual culture later became an inbreeding religion, the male bloodline degenerated by inbred females (XX). In itself, strange females would gladly be accepted, but strange males like the Serpent would not. So inbreeding resulted into male kinships, which are abnormalities in nature and leading here to autosomal recessive disorders as still occur in Muslim culture.
Severe inbreeding in the male bloodline had devastating effects on Muslim male DNA:
.jpg)
Thus, from religious standpoint, bipedal primates (Muslim cultures) accepted
male degeneracy by plowing back their own females and refused fresh DNA from strange males like 'Serpents'. It must be said that the first bipedal primates (7 Mya; 300cc) through Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) had a varied genome and could withstand inbreeding much better than Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc).
.png)
A special case of later Australopithecus (4.3-3 Mya; 400cc) was Homo naledi (3-2 Mya; 550cc), females of which were captured and raped by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), which Homo naledi most likely was our direct ancestor:
.png)
.png)
Just like Homo erectus only absorbed female DNA from Homo naledi, Homo sapiens only extracted the female genome from Homo Neanderthalensis.
Third phase: First Humans:
3: Creation of religion of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc)
INBREEDING VARIANT:
.png)
Again, 3 schemes from start to final analysis:
.png)
.png)
.png)
Homo erectus as bipedal primate had small inbred male populations that had great difficulty to become outbred by importing females from other tribes. They usually did not have a Tree of Knowledge (females) in the middle of the garden. If possible they captured and raped Homo naledi's females (to create later Homo sapiens).
Homo erectus discovered the soul needed to find one's own tribe after death for their next life. They developed outbred and inbred populations:
.png)
In inbred populations, females knew that their DNA would be plowed back into the male bloodline and they would be used only as objects, as incubators. They were nothing more than Adam's rib and If they protested, they were killed. The difference with modern-day honor killings is that Muslim women do not understand what cousin marriages and forced marriages are for. That is also the reason they have difficulty formulating an escape strategy.
The greatest tragedy is that they think their fathers love them and will not harm them. But there is a possibility that sick love will turn into murder.
Homo erectus is regarded as the first true human being. I think he mixed with female Homo naledi, from which Homo sapiens evolved:
.png)
.png)
Third phase: First Humans:
4: Creation of religion of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc)
OUTBREEDING VARIANT:
.png)
.png)
If possible, Homo erectus mixed with other tribes. Then they only needed the Tree of Knowledge (females) in the middle of the garden. If possible they captured and raped Homo naledi females.
.png)
And even though Homo naledi belonged to the same species, something was 'wrong' with Homo erectus 's uninhibited lust to outbreeding into other (sub)species, just like Homo sapiens captured and raped Homo neanderthalensis females as subspecies. This is precisely what the paradise myth was intended for:
What the Paradise story really means in the animal world:
IIt is a ritual to warn young males of the adulterous behavior of females, to prevent foreign male DNA from entering the male bloodline of the tribe. For example, Adam was instructed to prevent Eve from mating with the Serpent from another tribe and not to accept their child, the Apple, as his child.
But one step further back in the animal world and beyond animals that live in groups, we see the myth as a male sexual instinct to avoid strange offspring in females.
So the paradise story is actually a primal sexual instinct in the animal world to protect the integrity of species. Where subspecies can be mixed, the Paradise myth comes into effect...
The desire for outbreeding is unlimited in nature, only limited where mixing of species is not possible. And where subspecies can be mixed, the Paradise myth comes into effect.
5: Creation of Homo sapiens:
HOMO SAPIENS: PREFACE
(237) Mount Toba gave birth to the Tree of Knowledge
(240) Why the Muslim population exploded after Mount Toba
(240) Why the Muslim population exploded after Mount Toba
Genetic bottleneck theory
The Toba eruption has been linked to a genetic bottleneck in human evolution about 70,000 years ago,[28][29] which may have resulted from a severe reduction in the size of the total human population due to the effects of the eruption on the global climate.[30] According to the genetic bottleneck theory, between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, human populations sharply decreased to 3,000–10,000 surviving individuals.[31][32] It is supported by genetic evidence suggesting that today's humans are descended from a very small population of between 1,000 and 10,000 breeding pairs that existed about 70,000 years ago.[33].png)
Genetic variation of bipedal Hominids
- Like chimpanzees, the first bipedal Hominids must have had enormous genetic variation and even with a hampering exchange of juvenile females with other tribes, they would not have died out so easily.
- Then it is just a little step to understand the rise of the inbreeding culture of Australopithecus without too many autosomal recessive disorders over five million years. Inbreeding had all possibilities to develop into a tribal identity cult, into religion. Inbreeding had all time to settle into the human genome.
- And then we also understand the problem of the shrunk genetic variation of Homo sapiens, who inherited the inbreeding culture from Australopiths but not their abundant genetic variation. Human population nearly died out 74,000 years ago through the mount Toba super eruption, a catastrophe by which enormous amounts of volcano ashes came into the atmosphere for 10 years, followed by a thousand-year-long cooling episode:
- Like chimpanzees, the first bipedal Hominids must have had enormous genetic variation and even with a hampering exchange of juvenile females with other tribes, they would not have died out so easily.
- Then it is just a little step to understand the rise of the inbreeding culture of Australopithecus without too many autosomal recessive disorders over five million years. Inbreeding had all possibilities to develop into a tribal identity cult, into religion. Inbreeding had all time to settle into the human genome.
- And then we also understand the problem of the shrunk genetic variation of Homo sapiens, who inherited the inbreeding culture from Australopiths but not their abundant genetic variation. Human population nearly died out 74,000 years ago through the mount Toba super eruption, a catastrophe by which enormous amounts of volcano ashes came into the atmosphere for 10 years, followed by a thousand-year-long cooling episode:
Proponents of the genetic bottleneck theory (including Robock) suggest that the Toba eruption resulted in a global ecological disaster, including destruction of vegetation along with severe drought in the tropical rainforest belt and in monsoonal regions. For example, a 10-year volcanic winter triggered by the eruption could have largely destroyed the food sources of humans and caused a severe reduction in population sizes.[34] Τhese environmental changes may have generated population bottlenecks in many species, including hominids;[35] this in turn may have accelerated differentiation from within the smaller human population. Therefore, the genetic differences among modern humans may reflect changes within the last 70,000 years, rather than gradual differentiation over hundreds of thousands of years.[36]
Other research has cast doubt on a link between Toba and a genetic bottleneck. For example, ancient stone tools in southern India were found above and below a thick layer of ash from the Toba eruption and were very similar across these layers, suggesting that the dust clouds from the eruption did not wipe out this local population.[37][38][39] Additional archaeological evidence from southern and northern India also suggests a lack of evidence for effects of the eruption on local populations, leading the authors of the study to conclude, "many forms of life survived the supereruption, contrary to other research which has suggested significant animal extinctions and genetic bottlenecks".[40] However, evidence from pollen analysis has suggested prolonged deforestation in South Asia, and some researchers have suggested that the Toba eruption may have forced humans to adopt new adaptive strategies, which may have permitted them to replace Neanderthals and "other archaic human species".[41][42]
Additional caveats include difficulties in estimating the global and regional climatic impacts of the eruption and lack of conclusive evidence for the eruption preceding the bottleneck.[43] Furthermore, genetic analysis of Alu sequences across the entire human genome has shown that the effective human population size was less than 26,000 individuals at 1.2 million years ago; possible explanations for the low population size of human ancestors may include repeated population bottlenecks or periodic replacement events from competing Homo subspecies.[44]
We also know in the evolution of bipedal primates there have been about 26,000 individuals on average about 1,2 million years ago:
'Homo sapiens, Homo ergaster, and Homo erectus had, worldwide, a breeding population of about 18,000 people—no more than 26,000 people. This means that all over the world, every human-like species that could possibly contribute genes to a current human added up to a smaller population than that of gorillas today.'
Other research has cast doubt on a link between Toba and a genetic bottleneck. For example, ancient stone tools in southern India were found above and below a thick layer of ash from the Toba eruption and were very similar across these layers, suggesting that the dust clouds from the eruption did not wipe out this local population.[37][38][39] Additional archaeological evidence from southern and northern India also suggests a lack of evidence for effects of the eruption on local populations, leading the authors of the study to conclude, "many forms of life survived the supereruption, contrary to other research which has suggested significant animal extinctions and genetic bottlenecks".[40] However, evidence from pollen analysis has suggested prolonged deforestation in South Asia, and some researchers have suggested that the Toba eruption may have forced humans to adopt new adaptive strategies, which may have permitted them to replace Neanderthals and "other archaic human species".[41][42]
Additional caveats include difficulties in estimating the global and regional climatic impacts of the eruption and lack of conclusive evidence for the eruption preceding the bottleneck.[43] Furthermore, genetic analysis of Alu sequences across the entire human genome has shown that the effective human population size was less than 26,000 individuals at 1.2 million years ago; possible explanations for the low population size of human ancestors may include repeated population bottlenecks or periodic replacement events from competing Homo subspecies.[44]
We also know in the evolution of bipedal primates there have been about 26,000 individuals on average about 1,2 million years ago:
'Homo sapiens, Homo ergaster, and Homo erectus had, worldwide, a breeding population of about 18,000 people—no more than 26,000 people. This means that all over the world, every human-like species that could possibly contribute genes to a current human added up to a smaller population than that of gorillas today.'
----------------------------------------------
Proceeding with the Myth of Paradise:
- Fertility stress was a real instinct of Hominid inbreeding cultures. They practiced 'cousin marriages' to survive as a group, but the awful consequences of inbreeding developed only much later.
.png)
In this article the genesis of the myth is brought more into agreement with the evolution from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens. And that is not for nothing, since Australopiths, like chimps, were weaponized against inbreeding by a much more varied genome than Homo sapiens. This means genetic variation gave them far less autosomal recessive disorders by which very small groups will have survived over millions of years, until two million years ago. And that means the Myth of Paradise must have had a very different meaning in the time of the first bipedal Hominids:
(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial
About 140,000 years ago human populations from East or Central Africa moved southwards and colonized western southern Africa. The probable nearest living relatives of these source populations are: the Hadzabe people from north-central Tanzania and Mbuti pygmies from the eastern Congo. This migration gave rise to the present-day San hunter-gatherers (Bushmen). The San-people (and the Khoisan-group) are seen as the oldest Homo sapiens with the greatest genetic variation. They are said to show the human population genetic footprints:
About 140,000 years ago human populations from East or Central Africa moved southwards and colonized western southern Africa. The probable nearest living relatives of these source populations are: the Hadzabe people from north-central Tanzania and Mbuti pygmies from the eastern Congo. This migration gave rise to the present-day San hunter-gatherers (Bushmen). The San-people (and the Khoisan-group) are seen as the oldest Homo sapiens with the greatest genetic variation. They are said to show the human population genetic footprints:
On the other hand, out of Africa human population groups worldwide are highly homogeneous genetically. This means, inbreeding with autosomal recessive disorders
occurs sooner between Asians and Caucasians than within two neighbouring tribes of San people. They simply have more genetic variation in one tribe than we in the whole world.
San people escaped Mount Toba because they lived in Middle and South Africa:
'it killed most humans living at that time and is believed to have created a population bottleneck in central east Africa and India, which affects the genetic make-up of the human worldwide population to the present.'
Well, chimpanzees also have enormous genetic variation and even with a hampering exchange of juvenile females with other tribes they would not die out so easily. But Neanderthals did, however. This is because of the ice age, by which the forests shrunk and groups had growing difficulty in reaching other groups for the exchange of females.
San people escaped Mount Toba because they lived in Middle and South Africa:
'it killed most humans living at that time and is believed to have created a population bottleneck in central east Africa and India, which affects the genetic make-up of the human worldwide population to the present.'
Well, chimpanzees also have enormous genetic variation and even with a hampering exchange of juvenile females with other tribes they would not die out so easily. But Neanderthals did, however. This is because of the ice age, by which the forests shrunk and groups had growing difficulty in reaching other groups for the exchange of females.
Interesting facts:
High-frequency populations
The highest frequency of occurrence of epicanthic folds is found in specific populations or ethnicities: East Asians, Southeast Asians, Central Asians, North Asians, Polynesians, Micronesians, Indigenous peoples of the Americas, and some African peoples (especially among Khoisan and Nilotic peoples).5: Homo sapiens:
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Development and split of Homo Sapiens
About 70,000 years ago, humans split in East African pre-Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula (inbreeding) and Middle and West African Negro tribes in Sub Sahara
outbreeding):
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
West African tribes were driven close together against the harsh and inhospitable climate of the Sahara but survived in a moderate sea climate near the Atlantic Ocean. They developed FGM as a sexuality-attached instinct to trade women among numerous tribes with different DNA. Outbreeding is more likely in temperate and prosperous regions where many different tribes are established and DNA can be mixed easily:
.png)
West Africans developed Ancient Voodoo with reincarnation of ancestors while honoring gods in the parallel universe. So about 50,000 years ago:
.png)
.jpg)
But, East Africans, pre-Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula were isolated and had to develop sophisticated but now crazy inbreeding schemes to keep them from dying out from autosomal recessive disorders. They developed their world wide insane inbreeding culture:
.png)
.png)
Ancient Voodoo (Reincarnation), with God in Heaven was passed on the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks passed it on to Christianity: Polytheism, Outbreeding.
But Ancient Voodoo was also passed on to Jews in Ethiopia. Thus two types of Desert Religion were created from the split between East African Pre Muslims (monotheism) and West African negroes (Voodoo: polytheism):
.png)
The intention was to stop inbreeding through asexuality or outbreeding in Heaven. But Muslims did not quite succeed in turning their inbreeding culture into outbreeding:
Creation of Desert Religions:
Desert Religions in general:
.png)
.png)
Deserts are more prone to inbreeding than more temperate and affluent regions, which are more likely to outbreeding due to many different peoples living together (West African Negroes blocked by the Sahara: FGM):
About 4000 years ago Desert Religions tried to curb their inbreeding religion into outbreeding religion to get rid of reincarnation by inbreeding, replaced by resurrection through outbreeding or asexuality in heaven:
See (76):
More precisely they forbade polytheism with male and female idols and claimed monotheism through the only God in heaven.
.png)
Assumption 663: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection.
Assumption 664: Asexuality in heaven for souls and outbreeding for resurrected bodies (art 428). (428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi
At the same time, they wanted to remove divine self-determination from tribal head's afterlife. So Desert Religions played God's deputy on earth by depriving believers of their divine right to self-determination in the afterlife.
But they did not want to offend reincarnation believers directly by forbidding reincarnation and rather banned outward signs thereof as worshiping idols of deceased family members (ancestors who would reincarnate someday).
So they changed reincarnation into polytheism (according to their definition of worshiping multiple idols) and changed resurrection into monotheism (according to their definition 'of the only one God'). So they changed red with pink.
But we know better that multiple gods activate the entire fifth-dimensional religious space in the mind, allowing empathy with all sexual roles in the conscious. This means that polytheism is the only sound religion.
Desert Religions wanted to convert multiple gods (multiple idols) into a single God (to monotheism and therefore to a sick and shrunken 1-dimensional domain of religious space in the mind).
.png)
But unbeknownst to them, only Islam developed monotheistic and Judaism and Christianity polytheistic.
Desert Religions were actually trying to stop earthly inbreeding in favor of heavenly asexuality or outbreeding, so they actually wanted genuine polytheism in heaven instead of monotheism.
.png)
Now I agree labeling is a mess here, but I insist on the fundamental difference between Islam versus Judaism and Christianity, in which Islam has right and the other religions are polytheistic, beyond their knowing.
In other words:
Desert Religion's monotheism is factually polytheism because of:
See (76):
Assumption 663: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection.
Assumption 664: Asexuality in heaven for souls and outbreeding for resurrected bodies (art 428). (428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi
Further detailed explanation of what I mean:
Well, it's quite simple, when you exclude inbreeding, you go back to nature's primal sexual law: outbreeding or no sexuality at all. And in our view, outbreeding stands for polytheism (ancient Greeks and Northern European Western peoples (Christianity)).
So, while Desert Religions always thought to be monotheistic, in our view only Islam is monotheistic (worshiping only one God and despising female sexual roles into the unconscious), while Christianity and Judaism are completely polytheistic, because they experience female sexual roles empathetically in the conscious. So Islam is right.
Creation of Desert Religions:
Desert Religions more specific:
This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:
.png)
Desert Religions hated inbreeding:
The real difference between Islam and Judaism and Christianity
So called 'Abrahamic Religions' reversed the real myth of Abraham in order to eliminate divine self-destination from reincarnation believers with their idols (serial monotheism or polytheism). They called their own religions 'monotheistic', in which they worshiped a single God as male heterosexuality. But this is only true for Islam, because Judaism and Christianity developed actually polytheistic:
.png)
The real difference between polytheism and monotheism is that the first experiences
'other sexual roles' in the conscious, like Judaism and Christianity. But Islamic suppression of empathy for women to the unconscious is indeed monotheistic and can be seen as split sexual identity and conscience:
.jpg)
Because these religions developed in deserts, they are called Desert Religions, but different deserts created very different styles of breeding, of religion:
Pre-Muslims
Sixty thousand years ago a very small group of several hundred pre-Muslims had to learn to survive in the empty Arabian Peninsula by interbreeding within their own genome, without the possibility of exchanging females with other tribes because they were isolated.
.png)
As a result, they developed their characteristic completely inwardly directed culture of incest and inbreeding, which enhanced the inherited primary sexual instinct of bipedal primates: inbreeding or monotheism:
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
This led to the distinctive inbreeding culture of Muslims to this day, centered on isolation and exclusion of other cultures:
.jpg)
So, pre-Muslims in the Arabic Peninsula were isolated and had to develop crazy inbreeding schemes to keep them from dying out from autosomal recessive disorders. They developed an insane inbreeding culture:
On the other hand, Jews migrated with their whole population, with their complete genome and so their migration did not change breeding habits. Though they also had extreme incest (see Maimonides), they practiced no serial inbreeding over generations.
Jews did not migrate first to the Arabian Peninsula but originated directly from North Africa. Originally, they stem from kind of outbreeding cultures in the male kin lineage, marrying females from outside (like chimps):
.png)
.png)
And Jews changed the rules into the matrilineal bloodline:
Orthodox Judaism practices matrilineal descent and considers it self-evident. Orthodox Judaism holds that anyone with a Jewish mother also has irrevocable Jewish status; that even were such a Jew to convert to another religion, that person would still be considered Jewish by Jewish Law.
.png)
Though matrilineal descent was not obligatory, yet matrilineal mt-DNA became a selection criterion, giving 'female sexual roles' an empathetic place in the conscious of Jews. The influx of not Jewish males completed the population to outbreeding.
But Muslim inbreeding, on the other hand, is at odds with healthy natural selection and leads to autosomal recessive disorders and deteriorated intelligence.
Muslims found their inbreeding religion in the Arabian Peninsula and from there this culture spread as a religion fairly uniformly all over the world. Therefore, this was the last chance to develop their unifying sexual culture:
.png)
But as said, Jews never were in Saudi Arabia and came straight from deserts in central and north Africa and migrated with their whole and complete genome to Israel. Jews therefore lack the compelling inbreeding instinct. They did have a lot of incest, though.
(3500 years ago:)
.jpg)
This means that while both peoples were desert dwellers there was a distinctive difference because about the entire Jewish people migrated from Africa to Israel with their complete and varied genome.
Resume:
Pre-Muslims:
Muslims descend from little groups that migrated from East Africa about 60,000 years ago to the Arabian Peninsula and later to Asia, while some groups returned to North Africa about 40,000 years ago. The Arabian Peninsula is the last place where they all lived together and may have established their remarkable inbreeding culture, which is antithetical to nature. Their inbreeding instinct is at odds with today's Homo sapiens, although it certainly comes from the first bipedal primates and is therefore also the primordial religion of Homo sapiens:
.png)
Assumption 276: On leaving Africa inbreeding cultures likely entered a harsh desert like environment in the Levant or on the Arabian Peninsula, which changed sexual culture and religion dramatically. Desert life facilitated rigid cultures with order and regularity needed for inbreeding across generations. In later period increased tribal density caused to enlarge the number of inbred bodies to outnumber neighbouring hostile tribes with reincarnated ancestors. A regular society and the need for population growth were impetus for the notorious incubator farms of family semen which are still characteristic for nowadays Islam.
.png)
Assumption 277: The last possible origin of cousin marriages lies in the Arabian Peninsula about 50,000 years ago, where first human families (mt-DNA =L3N) could not exchange fresh juvenile females with other tribes and desperately had to find new formulas to exchange females within just a few families. This measure from the time derivative of sexual culture might have become instinctive 'religion' for Muslims.
Assumption 278: About 40.000 years ago Homo sapiens (mtDNA = L3N) returned from the Arabian Peninsula and Europe to North Africa, where they developed as Berbers or Imazighen.
Assumption 280: Three elements likely caused the emergence of the Muslim instinct, which is male as well as female kin bonded in nu-DNA to inbreeding and incest *. This mutational abnormality is unprecedented in other inbreeding cultures, which are only bonded in the male lineage and where females are refreshed completely every generation (chimps, bonobos, Australopithecus africanus, Neanderthals and Aboriginals).
* Inbreeding is male religion and dependent on testosterone. Therefore females admittedly inherited the inbreeding instinct from the first bipedal primates but hate inbreeding and chose for outbreeding, the primal sexual law of nature.
Jews:
Halakha, also transliterated as halacha, is the collective body of Jewish religious laws that are derived from the written and Oral Torah. Halakha is based on biblical commandments (mitzvot), subsequent Talmudic and rabbinic laws, and the customs and traditions which were compiled in the many books such as the Shulchan Aruch. Halakha is often translated as "Jewish law", although a more literal translation of it might be "the way to behave" or "the way of walking". The word is derived from the root which means "to behave" (also "to go" or "to walk"). Halakha not only guides religious practices and beliefs, it also guides numerous aspects of day-to-day life.[2]
Halacha: The Orthodox and Conservative movements generally consider Jews of matrilineal descent and converts members of the tribe, while the Reform and Reconstructionist movements include Jews of patrilineal descent as well.
Here is simply described in so many words the female kin bloodline. We are concerned here with respect for women that is expressed here, in contrast to Islam, which also feigns respect, but actually pumps female DNA back into the male bloodline (Adam's rib). All this means a big difference between Judaism and Muslims in which Jews at the time had a lot of incest, but Muslims inbred in the male lineage. Judaism points to a permanent influx of foreign male DNA (the Serpent), while Islam advocates a bleeding-to-death genome (autosomal recessive disorders).
Well, Judaism has been hit and miss throughout history, evolving from a kind of inbreeding to outbreeding. Our religious final verdict on Islam and Judaism changes through history, only Islam has been stable over time.
As said before, Jews did not migrate to the Arabian Peninsula but originated directly from North Africa. They stem from (mixed) outbreeding cultures in the male kin lineage, marrying females from outside (chimps, Ethiopian prayer):
.png)
Though matrilineal descent was not obligatory, yet matrilineal mt-DNA became a selection criterion, giving 'female sexual roles' an empathetic place in the conscious of Jews. The influx of not Jewish males completed the population to outbreeding.
But Muslim inbreeding, on the other hand, is at odds with healthy natural selection and leads to autosomal recessive disorders and deteriorated intelligence.
.png)
.jpg)
Islam also swapped the Tree of Life (Tree of Inbreeding) with the Tree of Knowledge (Tree of Outbreeding). They said that Adam was forbidden to eat from the Tree of Inbreeding, which was a lie, but then they refused to let Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge, because then a woman would get the honor of Outbreeding.
Before Islam, eternal life (earthly reincarnation) was combined with profane power. Below, Satan offers earthly power, possession and immortality in a Kingdom that never decays in this universe:
From sexual instinct via oral myth to clay tablets:
An oral myth contains no linguistic tricks to move the trees of paradise. And that means that at some point in time Homo sapiens deliberately inserted this ambiguity and adapted the myth for outbreeding cultures that placed the Tree of Knowledge of Autosomal Disorders at the center of the Garden. So the Tree of Life changed color.
Remember that it was Homo sapiens who lost most of his genetic variation and therefore could not stand extreme inbreeding any longer:
The San-people (Bushmen) in South Africa kept their genetic variation and escaped the Toba disaster of 74,000 years ago:
'On the other hand, human population groups worldwide outside Africa are highly homogeneous genetically. This means, inbreeding with autosomal recessive disorders occurs sooner between Asians and Caucasians than within two neighbouring tribes of San people. They simply have more genetic variation in one tribe than we in the whole world.'
This reduced genome caused a change in the Myth of Paradise that gave the Tree of Knowledge of Autosomal Recessive Disorders a more prominent place for the survival of the group.
Then, outbreeding cultures had the choice of 1: placing both trees in the middle of the garden or 2: removing the Tree of Life from the center of the garden and giving the Tree of Life the meaning of the Tree of Knowledge (outbreeding), or whatever...
This all means we need to figure out how the Tree of Life changed color in evolution.
6: Creation of Jewish Religion:
.png)
The female kin bloodline.
We are concerned here with respect for women that is expressed here, in contrast to Islam, which also feigns respect, but actually pumps female DNA back into the male bloodline (Adam's rib). All this means a big difference between Judaism and Muslims in which Jews at the time had a lot of incest, but Muslims inbred in the male lineage. Judaism points to a permanent influx of foreign male DNA (the Serpent), while Islam advocates a bleeding-to-death genome (autosomal recessive disorders).
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
The brilliant way Jewish scholars adapted Genesis to their will and even humbled God
indicates their great intelligence:
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Resurrection of Jesus
The resurrection story appears in more than five locations in the Bible. In several episodes in the Four Gospels Jesus foretells his coming death and resurrection, which he states is the plan of God the Father.[24] Christians view the resurrection of Jesus as part of the plan of salvation and redemption by atonement for man's sin.[25] Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth with soul, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2, from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law. The Pharisees, whose views became Rabbinic Judaism, eventually won (or at least survived) this debate. The promise of a future resurrection appears in the Torah as well as in certain Jewish works, such as the Life of Adam and Eve, c 100 BC, and the Pharisaic book 2 Maccabees, c124 BC.[27]
However, 1st century Judaism had no conception of a single individual rising from the dead in the middle of history. The historical Jewish concept of resurrection was that of a redemption of the whole people.[28] Their concept was always that everybody [sleeping forever, BD] would be raised together at the end of time [Rebirth with soul, BD]. So the idea of one individual rising in the middle of history was foreign to them.[29]
7: Creation of Pre-Muslims:
.png)
.png)
.png)
And Homo erectus inbreeding culture (above) is like Hominin inbreeding, which did not believe in the soul and reincarnation (below):
.png)
8: Creation of Islam:
Islam found a loophole in Jewish Scripture and swapped the Tree of Life (Tree of Inbreeding) with the Tree of Knowledge (Tree of Outbreeding)
Islam also swapped the Tree of Life (Tree of Inbreeding) with the Tree of Knowledge (Tree of Outbreeding). They said that Adam was forbidden to eat from the Tree of Inbreeding, which was a lie, but then they refused to let Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge, because then a woman would get the honor of Outbreeding.
Before Islam, eternal life (earthly reincarnation) was combined with profane power. Below, Satan offers earthly power, possession and immortality in a Kingdom that never decays in this universe:
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Resurrection and sins committed with that organ.
The majority of ahl as-sunnah scholars and Islamic theologians think that resurrection is going to be physical in the hereafter and human beings are going to be resurrected with their souls and bodies, called to account and be rewarded or punished. The Quranic verses seem to support this view (see Ta Ha 20:55, al-Hajj 22:5, 7; al-Nur 24:20, Ya Sin 36:78-79, al-Qiyamah 75:34). The fact that resurrection is going to be physical (with body) plays a role – partly though – on people’s hesitation about organ transplantation. However, when the issue is examined deeply, it is seen that organ transplantation is not directly related to resurrection; or more properly that organ transplantation has got nothing to harm the belief of resurrection because the transplanted organ is going to be returned to its real owner. Actually, it does not prevent organs to be resurrected with their real owners even though they decayed under soil, burnt to ashes, or eaten by animals. As a matter of fact, the Quran states that one’s organs are going to be gathered together with the slightest details in the hereafter (al-Qiyamah 75:34). Islamic scholars, judging from this proof and the likes, have concluded that everyone is going to be resurrected with their own organs.
.jpg){kind=small}
.png){kind=link}
No comments:
Post a Comment