Monday, 18 March 2019

(261) The myth of the bipedal mutation

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive










The myth of the bipedal mutation

A long time ago, a great ape had fallen from a tree. He had fallen on his head and had some brain damage that prevented him from getting on all fours. So he had to walk on two legs for the rest of his life. He also had some difficulty climbing trees. The other apes laughed at him because he was weird. It was a stupid sight, but the advantage was that other animals saw it for upright standing aggression.

The poor creature was hit by the bipedal mutation and also had some other shortcomings. For example, he was sickly creative and tied grasses together like ropes all day long. He also made a kind of spears from long branches, which he sharpened by biting or dragging over the rocky ground. And so he defended himself against feline predators in the plains.

Due to this brain disorder, his offspring no longer roamed in circles, like normal chimpanzees who never stumble more than 2 miles a day. No, bipeds walked about 9 miles a day straight to the horizon. They roamed unstoppable all over the world.

It seemed that their damaged brain told them that there was a pot of gold at the horizon. They never returned, and much later their greedy disorder plunged the world into disaster. Bipeds never returned to the safe haven of the forests.


Quadrupeds laughed at bipeds and in turn upright walking apes no longer liked other chimpanzees because they looked unattractive and stupid.

The problem is that bipeds disappeared in all directions and had great difficulty meeting their own kind. And so they had no other choice as pairing within the own group. This was very different from four-legged chimpanzees (on all fours), from which young females escaped three trees farther to other tribes. Because young females have the outbreeding instinct, which is quite normal in nature.

What we see is the reason for inbreeding is the bipedal mutation:



Assumption 455: 'Inbreeding and incest' is collateral damage from the bipedal mutation.




Parsimony and content validity

The Sexual Theory of Religion is parsimonious and no other theory of religion is based on such a simple formula: HR = f (SR).

But parsimony makes no sense if the formula is not based on the true nature of religion, given by the evolution. This concerns content validity, in which no other religion finds its origin in the bipedal mutation from Australopithecus:





From the contrast between quadrupeds and bipeds the sexual theory of religion emerged:



In addition to the inferential formula HR = f (SR), the theory can be described as well in the form of multiple regression:



The validity of the theory is evident from the fact that the Myth of Paradise, the Myth of Abrahamhonor killings and other aspects are explained integrally by the theory. There is no sensible explanation from other religious theories to be expected. In case of religious disruptions as honor killings, all other theories are invalid. 


                                    


cc-by-nc-sa







This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment