About Me

My photo
I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found.

Monday, 18 March 2019

(263) The inbreeding instinct and racism

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive









Assumption 336The inbreeding instinct is a human instinct developed somewhere between Homo erectus (2,2 Mya; 900cc) and the Arabian Peninsula (Homo sapiens, 60-50 Kya; 1400cc). It is a typical male instinct which aims at earthly reincarnation into tribal inbred bodies enforced by cousin marriages. It is still vividly present in the Muslim culture. But maybe there was an earlier variant aiming at 'rebirth without soul' from Homo naledi (2.3 Mya; 550cc). But we reserve the inbreeding instinct for reincarnation with the soul.

The inbreeding instinct is what Muslims do not recognize as their common denominator, as their group identity. It is sustained as long as Muslims marry other Muslims. But beware, new Muslims in religious endogamy do not naturally have this instinct. For example Boko Haram, (mtDNA L2), from sub-Saharan Africa, originally comes from outbreeding (Voodoo). On the other hand, Pakistani with mtDNA L3M are originally Muslims:




More and more I gained understanding of Islam in what Muslims have done trying to become really good people of high morality. From their viewpoint they sincerely succeeded. But according to standards and values of other people it has gone terribly wrong. On many moral issues they are diametrically opposed to Western values. From a moral point of view, Muslims are the antiprojection of the human race. Why? How is this possible? The answer is given in this blog: inbreeding cultures are only sustainable if they reject other cultures.

Their roots lie in the desert of the Arabian Peninsula (Saudi Arabia), where they fought in animosity with other Bedouin tribes about 60.000 years ago. It was a harsh environment to survive. Maybe from there comes their questionable morality. 


Assumption 276On leaving Africa inbreeding cultures likely entered a harsh desert like environment in the Levant or on the Arabian Peninsula, which changed sexual culture and religion dramatically. Desert life facilitated rigid cultures with order and regularity needed for inbreeding across generations. In later period increased tribal density caused to enlarge the number of inbred bodies to outnumber neighbouring hostile tribes with reincarnated ancestors. A regular society and the need for population growth were impetus for the notorious incubator farms of family semen which are still characteristic for nowadays Islam.
But the real reason for the Islamic fiasco is the evil interaction between their inbreeding instinct leading to earthly reincarnation and Islam for heavenly resurrection. That gave the psychotic twirl to their religion that makes males crazy and psychopathic against females, resulting in honor killings and acid attacks:



So, 'inbreeding with Islam' is a poisonous mixture, see this blog.

The Muslim people resemble a constellation of autosomal recessive disorders, caused by unnatural selection of individuals over many millions of years. This makes integration with other people very difficult and assimilation impossible:








Inbreeding cultures are inherently and by definition 'racist'. Otherwise they can not exist and become outbred populations. They see themselves as Übermenschen and outbred peoples as Untermenschen. Dehumanizing non-believers from other tribes facilitates murder, just like 'other sexual roles' (homosexuals, women and children). Heterosexual males are subjects and all others are objects that can be killed freely. It is weird hearing Muslims protesting against racism in the American Congress.





Not all human races or ethnicities are equal. Outbred peoples are more equal and equivalent than inbred peoples. This simply because inbred populations came about by selective breeding in which ideological outliers were systematically eliminated in the evolution (identity politics):



So, in general we reject 'racism', but not for people who, from their deepest conviction, despise other people and regard them as lesser species.


Assumption 240: The development of racism.

1: In the animal world groups accept only members of the same kind so they can propagate. Hence, a group of gorillas will not accept a female chimp. This is discrimination between species. Later in the evolution, a different form of discrimination emerged, but now as discrimination within species, called racism.


2: Though all kind of Homininae (7 Mya; 400 cc) possibly were of the same species, they already started to select their own kind, their own race. Within the same species their group identity drifted away from pure physical propagation into the religious propagation of tribal identity (religion). So, they were not interested in pure propagation with other Homininae races any longer, but more in maintaining feelings from tribal identity. But the best way to control for tribal belongingness was race, not culture what could be faked, if they could speak and understand each other. So, Homininae already attended to external racial characteristics to select between and within groups from the same species for a not racial goal.

3: Much later racism must have been strengthened further through reincarnation into the tribe (Homo erectus (2 Mya, 900 cc)). For, only by pure inbred bodies from descendants, ancestors could reincarnate into the tribe. Concluding, real racism started with the Homininae (7 Mya; 400cc) and was strenghtened by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).

4: Homo sapiens (350 YA; 1400cc) developed bigger tribes and bigger cultures. Still, tribal belongingness (religion) was noticed from the racial appearance of foreigners. The same in the later period of ethnic endogamy. Only later in religious endogamy, factual religion (Islam, Christianity) really became more important than race. For example, today the religious endogamic outer layer of Islam is not filled with Arabs any longer, but with a billion people from other races. Yet, we judge Islam as a completely racist culture because it distinguishes between human beings like the Nazis: It oppresses 'other sexual roles' and kills non-believers.

5: Concluding: in the evolution preserving genes from groups has been changed into preserving religion within human tribes.

6: But because selective breeding cultures like Islam imply strong interactions between ethnicity and culture, racial appearance still effectively triggers cultural (religious) discrimination. Therefore, also in the modern world racism continues to be a simple and effective mechanism to distinguish between persons from different cultures. Obviously, this results in many errors of judgment.










cc-by-nc-sa







This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence

No comments:

Post a Comment