Saturday, 9 September 2023

(442) NUMBER ARCHIVE Januari 2024


Basic Dimension





Basic Dimension, Netherlands

I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology
 and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. 
Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found


PLEASE KEEP THIS HOMEPAGE 
FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS

THIS BLOG IS A THEORETICAL BREAKTHROUGH
 IN HUMAN RELIGION AND HONOR KILLING.
THAT IT DOES NOT FADE INTO OBLIVION.
THERE'S NO OTHER IN THE WORLD.

A BREAKTHROUGH TO THE STATE OF NATURE, 
PLACING RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENTS 
IN THE RIGHT CONTEXT.

BUT THIS BLOG WILL NOT BE FOREVER,
 IT WILL DISAPPEAR IN THE CLOUD,
    INACCESSIBLE AND FORGOTTEN.

IF BOTH, THE PERPETRATOR AND THE VICTIM
 MUST BE SPARED FROM SHARP CRITICISM, 
THEN THERE IS NO ETHICS LEFT IN OUR 
WOKE SOCIETY AND THEN THE CURTAIN 
FALLS OVER  MORALITY OF 
WESTERN CULTURE.

I THANK THE BLOGGER ETHICS
COMMISSION FOR THEIR SUPPORT.

ON THIS HOMEPAGE I HAVE SUMMARIZED 
THE MOST  IMPORTANT CONCLUSIONS
  ABOUT HONOR KILLING AND THE
 ORIGIN OF HUMAN RELIGION.


SIMPLY COPYING THIS HOMEPAGE IS SUFFICIENT:

CONTENT OF THIS HOMEPAGE:



CAPITA SELECTA:

1: Religion is a projection on Breeding (Art. 438)
2: Reincarnation and Resurrection (Art. 439)
3: Honor Killing Proneness (Art. 440)
4: Honor Killing in Islamic Culture (Art. 441)
5: Fundamental Principles (Art. 434)
6: Creation of Sexual Religion (DID)(Art. 435)
7: Creation of Honor Killings (DID)(Art. 436)
8: Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) (Art. 437)
9: Creation of the Myth of Paradise (Art. 432)
10: Evolution of the Myth of Paradise (Art. 433)
11: Creation of the Myth of Abraham (Art. 442)
12: Creation of the Sacrifice Feast (DID) (Art. 443)
13: How the Muslim Faith will fall apart (Art. 444)


GOOGLE TRANSLATE:

Modules of images, graphs, drawings and assumptions:

This blog is made up of modules, represented as images in a colored framework (see above). This concerns drawings, text and graphics. Once you're familiar with these pictures, you'll quickly recognize follow-up articles, if only by the recurring pictures. You will also find 'Assumptions' in image format. These are the house of cards on which the whole theory is based. These assumptions can be found in the four articles below. From there you can read these messages in your own language via Google Translate:

List of assumptions by number:

You could try Assumption 668 from (76):


List of articles with first placed pictures by number:



This blog developed human religious evolution on the basis of a house of cards of 700 assumptions, which are mutually agreed upon. This provided a certain coherence on which the theory is based. This means that written religion has not provided any guidance, which would have amounted by the way, to retrospective religious research. Instead, we switched to prospective research (see Myth of Abraham).


NUMBER ARCHIVE




Basic Dimension, Netherlands












⚠️






Foreword to this blog

(1) Foundations of Human Religion
(2) Human religion, the timelessness derivative of sexuality
(3) The Tragedy of God
(4) Human religion as operant conditioning
(5) Honor killings caused by inbreeding and incest  
(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales ðŸ”´ðŸ”´
(7) Honor killings in Islamic culture
(8) Honor killing Scenarios
(9) The Convergence Theory of Paradise
(13) The Evolution of Female Religion
(14) The Conquest of Endogamous Populations
(15) A new approach to Honor killings 
(15) Een nieuwe benadering van Eerwraak
(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam ðŸ”´
(17) Proving other faiths as objects
(18) Islam and Christianity in Paradise
(19) The Battle of Allahs
(20) Islam, the Red Giant
(21) The Basic Dimension of Religion
(22) Antipodal Religions in Basic Dimension 
(23) Counter-cyclical cultures in Basic Dimension
(24) Crumbling Islam lost tribal identity
(25) Honor killings in short
(26) Religions identified by group permeability
(27) Thou shalt propagate in genetic diversity
(28) The Key to Human Religion (Part 1) [Mammals]
(29) The Key to Human Religion (Part 2) [Homininae]
(30) The Key to Human Religion (Part 3) [Homo erectus]
(31) The Key to Human Religion (part 4) [Homo sapiens]
(32) The Archetype of God
(33) Chrislam, God of Policor
(34) Freedom of Speech 
🔴[Drawings prophet Mohammed]
(43) The Incest Inbreeding Compensation Model
(44) The Evolution of Pedophilia
(45) Selective breeding with Homininae
(46) The Schengen Necrology of European Culture
(47) The Curse of Enlightenment
(48) Federica Mogherini's lustful submission to Chrislam ðŸ”´ðŸ”´
(49) The Fatal Flaw in Islam
(50) The Cause of Chrislam
(51) Women's emancipation causes Chrislam
(52) Space-time, wormhole to God for primitive man
(53) Space-time for Hominids
(54) Roots of racism
(55) The time derivative of sexual culture
(56) Homo orgasmus
(57) Chrislamic orgasm ðŸ”´
(58) Homo naledi: Antedating Human Religion
(59) The Killer Hominid

List of assumptions by number:

(73) The Sexual Theory of Religion  (Part 1: 1-59)
(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)
(75) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 3: 120-400)
(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 400-700)🔴🔴🔴

(77) Homo naledi from rebirth to reincarnation 
(78) Roaming led to bonobo religion
(79) Sexual crisis in Islam
(80) Why gay people must be sick
(81) The future of Islam
(82) Political correctness as sexual disorder
(87) The blessing of multiculturalism

(88) The Alpha Male of Dutch Parliament

(89) Marital rape
(90) Policor, the new religion
(91) Why Muslims kill homosexuals
Blogger Help Forum, Blogspot is adding extra lines with every update
(92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught
(93) Christianity lost SM-dyad
(94) Rape and murder distinguish between religions ðŸ”´
(95) Policor fears the white elephant
(96) Mitochondrial DNA males and females
(97) The Alpha male started inbreeding and incest
(98) Inheritance patterns
(99) Breaking sadomasochism
(100) The insatiable serial killer
(101) Femdomized Western culture
(102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom 
(103) Infanticide proves genetic immortality
(104) Genetic immortality and perpetual orgasm
(105) Western Europe, Muslim Paradise on Earth
(106) Concealed ovulation
(107) Homo naledi: The sum of its parts
(108) Homo naledi: The sticks and lianas theory🔴
(109) Homo naledi and the Underworld 
(110) Homo naledi as inbreeding culture
(111) Homo naledi: Finding Rebirth Graveyards
(148) Paradise Myth will cause WWIII
(149) Overflow of the inbreeding instinct

(150) Amsterdam Post, 5 october 2012 (Van Frikschoten)
(151) The Muslim incrowd syndrome
(152) The Islamic thermometer
(153) Differential regression of the Muslim culture
(154) Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.)
(155) The Melania Trump effect
(156) Coefficient of Relationship (C.O.R.)
(157) The schism of policor
(158) Dynamics of religion
(159) Proof belief of earthly reincarnation into descendants
(160) Breakthrough in honor killings ðŸ”´⚠️
(161) Grandpa, please come into my womb 
(162) Muslim 'honor' signifies fertility stress
(163) The Muslim fertility obsession
(164) Ancestors are hybrid god projections
(165) Tragedy: The battle of gods from Adam and Eve
(166) Religious terror from the German Government
(167) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 1
(168) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 2
(169) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 3
(170) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 4

(173) THE RULES OF SEXUAL RELIGION 7
(180) Homosexuality and fertility stress
(181) Intermittent reinforcement of religion
(182) The Swedish Act With Ass Up
(183) Islam looks like an autosomal recessive disorder
(184) The Muslim autosomal recessive disorder syndrome
(185) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 1
(186) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 2
(187) Yin and Yang in policor
(188) The race of anti-policor to salvation
(189) Policor, the decadent society
(190) Australopithecus interbred with Homo sapiens?
(191) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 3⚠️
(192) Islam as psychiatric syndrome 4
(193) Masochism love, hate and fear ðŸ”´
(194) The twist in the Muslim instinct
(433) Evolution of the Myth of Paradise
(434) Fundamental principles of this blog
(435) Introduction into bipedal primate religion
(436) Creation of Honor Killings
(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)
(438) Religion is a projection on Breeding
(439) Reincarnation and Resurrection
(440) Honor Killing Proneness
(441) Honor Killing in Islamic Culture









Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

(438) Religion is a projection on Breeding

What is Human Religion:

Assumption 680: Human Religion.

1: Human religion is the rationalization of the male sexual drive in the unconscious.

2. Male sexual drives serve to force women into sexual intercourse.

3: In nature, sexual drives are functions of breeding.

4: Then, human religions are rationalized functions of breeding.

5: So, human religions are deceptive functions of breeding, serving to coerce women into sexual intercourse with sacred and murderous pressure.

6: Males modify female sexual behavior in such a way that benefits them (FGM, cousin marriages, pedophilia, SM-dyad, Vanilla-dyad, etc).




Only Breeding is mentioned as Sexual Religion (SR) because it is the primal sexual instinct in the animal world. But actually Breeding is already combined in the unconscious with a lot of attached and conditioned specific instincts as Rebirth and Reincarnation:









        


  Resurrection is just a powerless word and no sexual instinct: 


Muslim faith is a hybrid religion of reincarnation (unconscious) and resurrection (conscious):


Reincarnation in inbred populations is fueled only by testosterone. Females commit no honor killings:


Religion is a projection on breeding.



Where do we come from?













































 
Fallacy of Islam:










Fallacy of Islam:
You cannot change an inbred population ex cathedra into an outbred population:



Serial monotheism exists when only males can reincarnate into the male bloodline, because females simply come from Adam's rib without own DNA (cousin marriages). They are just incubators for family sperm. They are not subjects but objects without any personal identity:


Homo sapiens, the deluded species

Monotheism= f(SM-dyad (Inbreeding)).
Polytheism= f(Vanilla-dyad (Outbreeding)).

Assumption 676: The Constitution of Multiculturalism.
Human religion is the rationalization of the male sexual drive in the unconscious, intended to coerce female sexuality for the pleasure of males.
Human religion is also a projection on breeding, where inbreeding cultures by definition treat people differently in terms of equality.
By providing protection for these discriminatory religions under the Moral Constitution of Western society, which purports to be the guardian of justice, the injustice of inbreeding cultures has been given a status of legal inviolability that is in direct conflict with the spirit of the Constitution.
In this way a Constitution has been created that protects inequality, murder and manslaughter.
This tragedy is the greatest fallacy of Western narrow-mindedness and conceit.
As the crowning glory of Western civilization, religion has long been seen as humanity's highest ethical value, protected by the United Nations Moral Constitution and Human Rights Watch.
But rarely has civilized man better demonstrated his moral incapacity. Therefore, in evolution, masochistic polytheism always digs its own grave, swallowed up by sadistic monotheism.

Assumption 681: Curtain falls over morality Western Culture.

If both, the perpetrator and the victim must be spared from sharp criticism, then there is no ethics left in our woke society and then the curtain falls over morality of Western culture.




The purpose of ethics

The purpose of ethics is to protect the weaker from the stronger. In this way one protects unborn life against the arbitrariness of the mother, the daughter against her father, the lamb against the lionoutbreeding against inbreeding and therefore polytheism against monotheism

But what if both need to be protected. That's what the Constitution intends. How can one protect the lion without it eating the lamb? Well that's self-deception. There are therefore limits to ethics where ethics go against the laws of nature. And that is also why the Moral Constitution of Western Society cannot protect victims of discriminatory religions against honor killings, stoning, murder and manslaughter. Or is masochistic Christianity wallowing in its twisted but self-fulfilling prophecy?

Assumption 681: Curtain falls over morality Western Culture.

If both, the perpetrator and the victim must be spared from sharp criticism, then there is no ethics left in our woke society and then the curtain falls over morality of Western culture.







In other words: Does the Moral Constitution of Western society - what a joke - unconsciously aim to surrender to monotheism, whereby polytheism always naturally disintegrates as a matter of time, while monotheism as a closed inbreeding culture remains integrally stable and coherent?




















Assumption 677SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad. 

SM-dyad  is a sexual instinct caused by inbreeding and found exclusively in bipedal primates (humans). Animals do not systematically practice inbreeding and therefore have no need for SM-dyad. Animals would also not be able to control SM-dyad, which would lead to its dissolution into rape and murder and extinction of the species. After all, animal females would certainly disagree with the lustful masochism of human females, without which SM-dyad cannot exist. 

Vanilla-dyad emerged as a civilized cultural intervention on SM-dyad through human outbreeding. But SM-dyad is much stronger and will always prevail. Vanilla-dyad is not yet seen as a Sexual Instinct (SI) on this blogBut it is certainly possible that Vanilla-dyad still has some deep roots in animal sexuality, but not in contrast to SM-dyad.









Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

(439) Reincarnation and Resurrection





Reincarnation and Resurrection.

Assumption 679: Reincarnation and Resurrection.

Homo naledi (2.3 Mya - 236 Ka; 550cc) was an Australopithecus with an excellently functioning speech center in his small 'animal brain'. A brain, however, based on a simple but reasonably complete human design. A basic human brain inherited from 'natural thinking animals'. This means that even Australopiths from 3 million years ago could speak and apparently didn't believe in the soul and the afterlife and that kind of psychotic nonsense. Because that's why you need an enlarged psychotic brain.




And also interesting: from 2.3 million years to 236 thousand years ago, Homo naledi probably remained the same unchanged creature, all individuals of which looked alike and were copies of each other. A clear indication of extreme inbreeding as a balanced dog race.



Homo naledi was more civilized in a religious sense than Homo sapiens and did not bluntly throw his deaths into CO2 neutral ovens, but conscientiously 'buried' them deep down in the Rising Star Cave (Johannesburg) near the God of Darkness to bring their bodies to life again as renewed fetuses with original DNA and personality (Just like Muslims btw):



As a natural thinker, with only half a brain, Homo naledi did not need a soul to replace himself somewhere in another life. The God of Darkness simply extended his previous life through rebirth without a soul. 



Then, it is quite understandable to expect psychotic Homo erectus with his extremely enlarged brain (900cc) to believe in the soul and reincarnation.

Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) could not accept that he was nothing more than his body without any eternal identity and so he postulated the soul. His soul also had to reincarnate him long after death into the right tribe where he belonged. That tribe could also be an inbred population. 

But for inbreeding cultures this meant the difficult task of preserving family genome through 'cousin marriages' for the male bloodline and also of keeping offspring of females free from alien seed caused by adultery (hybrids: Eve's Serpent).



Daughters therefore had to reinforce XY-DNA of the male lineage with their female XX-DNA (cousin marriages), which incidentally came from Adam's rib and so also from the male bloodline.

This all, for not to reincarnate into hybrids of unknown origin and thereafter to be refused from re-entering their tribes as bastards themselves. After which they had to wander as ghosts through space forever in tribal separation anxiety.



In these days, daughters knew very well why they had to neglect their inborn outbreeding instinct, while propagating the male bloodline. But in nowadays Muslim culture, nobody knows where cousin marriages are really meant for because reincarnation is repressed in the unconscious on pain of death for already 1400 years.




The bottom line is when Muslim girls would know what is really happening to them, they would lose unreasonable fear and would be much more capable of taking countermeasures.

Homo sapiens also believed in reincarnation, which had become a Sexual Instinct (SI) in two million years and is unconsciously still vividly alive in Muslim populations, despite their conscious belief in resurrection with Allah in heaven.


Fallacy of Islam: You cannot change an inbred population ex cathedra into an outbred population:



Conditioning reincarnation (magically) on the birth process made it just another superstrong (magically and thus not really needed) sexual instinct within 2 million years. This because the primal sexual law in nature is bond to birthing and directed to outbreeding to prevent extinction of species.  And because religion is just a rational interpretation of an unconscious sexual instinct, religion is also a projection on breeding in the first place.

The problem with resurrection is that it explicitly has nothing to do with procreation, with breeding, with the birth process, or propagation of the species. This means that resurrection is notSexual Instinct (SI). Resurrection is nothing but a meaningless word, a joke in religionAnd that is precisely why the Muslim faith will have to indoctrinate Islam until the end of time to keep repressed the ineradicable magical reincarnation instinct linked to inbreeding. It's a hopeless endeavor.



Homo sapiens inherited reincarnation from Homo erectus. Reincarnation with outbreeding was no problem (FGM) but with inbreeding it became disastrous, because Homo sapiens had a less varied genome than Homo erectus. That's why Desert Religions were terrified from autosomal recessive disorders caused by extreme inbreeding.

They told believers that resurrection to God in heaven would prevent the birth process and that their own bodies would be reconstructed before God with their own souls and original DNA. That would suit them better than reincarnation through inbreeding.

Well, apart from the needless soul this is exactly Rebirth from Homo naledi. And they also told believers how stupid cousin marriages were because reincarnation into descendants after so many generations caused impaired family genomes through mismatches from adulterous females.

Another point they will have said is that the body forms the soul, just as modern psychology learns about self identity. And so Desert Religions tried to throw sand in the eyes of believers to become God's Representatives on earth.

But as said before, Desert Religions did not understand that religion is a function of breeding. And that's why they told believers in vain to follow resurrection, where reincarnation is a super strong (magical) sexual instinct.

As long as humans do not understand where religion comes from they will have less brains than Homo naledi. He did not believe in resurrection in heaven and also not in the soul. He believed in rebirth on earth with his own self identity and his own DNA but not in some fake universe from psychotic cauliflower brains.



The Bible does not mention the word 'reincarnation':





The Bible does not mention reincarnation, which is without a doubt the most important breakthrough in human religion in evolution. Instead, the Bible talks about idols (polytheism)





So reincarnation (below) became polytheism and the one God in heaven monotheism. As a result resurrection changed erroneously into monotheism:



But Heaven in the parallel universe must be polytheistic and based on nature's primary sexual law: outbreeding. Like the 72 virgins from other tribes:





Desert Religions tried to outlaw inbreeding and incest because Homo sapiens had a very impoverished genome and fell prey to autosomal recessive disorders. This is in contrast to Australopithecus and Homo erectus.

But with monotheism they also tried to rob tribal heads of reincarnation cultures of their divine power to determine their own afterlife on the basis of inbreeding. They took all the power in the Bible, as God's substitute on earth, while worshiping idols, both male and female sexual roles, is the only 'healthy' religion. The Bible is therefore decadent.

Our definition of religion:

According to our definition of religion, Judaism and Christianity are actually polytheistic (outbreeding) and only Islam is monotheistic (partly inbreeding/partly outbreeding). Polytheism is when both male and female sexual roles are divinely worshiped (Baal: outbreeding). Then both sexes could also reincarnate. 

In monotheism there is only a single (male) God (inbreeding)Serial monotheism is when only males reincarnate into the male bloodline (inbreeding cultures).





As mentioned previously on this blog, Judaism believes itself to be monotheistic (inbreeding) because it worships only one God of male heterosexuality (and not also Baal, who gave sexual power to women, which combination between two peoples would amount to outbreeding) .

But in contemporary Judaism, women's mt-DNA determines group identity because women in sexual freedom can choose their husbands (which is cutting corners in this discussion). So the Jewish Bible calls itself monotheistic, while this blog concludes that their actual religion must be polytheistic. And indeed, Jewish women can simply marry non-Jewish men (outbreeding), which, in short, makes their children Jewish.

Though matrilineal descent was not obligatory, yet matrilineal mt-DNA became a selection criterion, giving 'female sexual roles' an empathetic place in the conscious of Jews. The influx of not Jewish males completed the population to outbreeding.



Why was the worship of Baal and Asherah a constant struggle for the Israelites?

'Throughout the Old Testament, we read accounts of idol worship among the Israelites, especially the worship of Baal and Asherah, or sometimes Baal and Ashtoreth. The paganism that surrounded God’s people crept in, gained a foothold, and led to much misery. It was a constant struggle to stay true to the Lord their God.'

'God had commanded Israel not to worship idols (Exodus 20:3; Deuteronomy 5:7)—indeed, they were to avoid even mentioning a false god’s name (Exodus 23:13). To prevent compromise, they were warned not to intermarry with the pagan nations and to shun practices that might be construed as pagan worship rites (Leviticus 20:23; 2 Kings 17:15; Ezekiel 11:12).

' There are several reasons why the worship of Baal and Asherah was such a problem for Israel. First, the worship of Baal and Asherah held the allure of illicit sex, since the religion involved ritual prostitution. This is exactly what we see in the incident of Baal of Peor, as “the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women, who invited them to the sacrifices to their gods” (Numbers 25:1–2). During this episode an Israelite named Zimri brazenly brought a Midianite woman into the camp and went straight to his tent, where the two began having sex (verses 6–8, 14–15).'

What we see above is the same as in Islam, where Muslim women have to marry Muslims. Essentially this is inbreeding, but the large domain of available Muslim males actually results in outbreeding




And that is why Islam today is polytheistic, while its earlier inbreeding culture was (serial) monotheistic (inbreeding).




What we also see above is that the Jewish Bible pursued political goals in destroying those who worshiped idols. They tried to prevent outbreeding with women of Baal, in favor of the closed identity of the Jewish people. But the lion's share of idol worshipers were believers of reincarnation who wanted to be born into their descendants through inbreeding. And that is why the Bible makes no mention of reincarnation, while the worship of idols actually concerns it most:















Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

(440) Honor killing Proneness


THE KEY TO HONOR KILLING:

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

Beware of what you don't want to be:











Are you thinking about suicide? We can all help prevent suicide.

Are you thinking about suicide? We can all help prevent suicide 

https://www.113.nl › i › zelfmoordBel 112 of 113 of 0900-0113
Denk jij aan zelfmoord? Trek dan zo snel mogelijk aan de bel. 








Honor killing proneness of your father

The baseline of the threat of honor killing is your relationship with your father, which you must monitor closely from entering pubertyYou expect your father to love you the way he always did, and never will harm you. But that's a delusion, because his ''love'' for you may take on quite another dimension. He may "love" you so much that he would like to merge with you forever by being reborn into your descendants. That's reincarnation through inbreeding. He wants to preserve family DNA through cousin marriage and you must play for incubator, as breeding ground for family sperm. 

So, his love for you can just turn into sick 'love'Similar to the kind of love in which psychotic men eventually kill their unrequited "love". Romina Ashrafi's father loved his daughter dearly but became reincarnation psychotic when she 'let him down' for another man with disapproved DNA.

It starts when he unconsciously claims your body as an incubator for family sperm. You will remain a subject, a person if you don't argue about marrying his nephew, his projected stand in, by the way. But you will become an object, a thing by distorting his reincarnation delusion. Then he no longer sees you as a person. The remedy is to be diplomatic and to avoid any answer, other than "I'm not yet ready to decide to marry my cousin."

The longer your father continues to push you into a cousin marriage, the stronger his reincarnation psychosis takes shape. Mind you, as long as you don't provide a definitive answer, he will remain hopeful, but at some point you will have to plan your flight and then never come back. Because out of sight, out of mind. 

But due to this lack of communication, your father will no longer see you as a subject and if you ever return 'to make amendments', he will kill you as an object like Sadia Sheikh (killed by her brother Mudusar btw *) and Romina Ashrafi.

This simply because he lost the 'subject counterweight' from his conscious and now is only left with his unconscious reincarnation drive, in which he only sees you as an incubator of family semen:



So, you are still his beloved daughter if he experiences you every day and if you maintain good relationships. In this you are the subject of his daughter.

But if you argue about his desire to marry your cousin or accepting another forced marriage, you will create conflicts that you should have avoided. And it's here that you can delay your own honor killing.

Much has been written about this on this blog and here only in general terms. 

Finally: From puberty onwards, your father might see you as a thing (an object) and as a person (a subject) at the same time.

You are a thing if he uses you for inbreeding due to his his unconscious reincarnation drive.

And you remain a subject if you don't argue about marrying his nephew, his projected stand in

A difficult complication is that girls in puberty become increasingly distant from their fathers with more and more conflicts, which is a natural development. All this requires more diplomacy from Muslim girls than could be expected.

And if you ever run away from home, never go to the police in Muslim countries, because they will take you back home like in the case of Romina Ashrafi. Because yes, ultimately police officers are also fathers with daughters...

'Romina Ashrafi ran away from home with her 34-year-old boyfriend after her father banned them from getting married, Arab news channel Al Jazeera reports. However, the couple was found by police five days later. Although Romina told them she feared for her life, officers sent the teenager back home to Talesh, a small town more than three hundred kilometers northwest of capital Tehran.'

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Iran,-father-murders-daughter-after-elopement.-
Activists-and-civil-society-in-revolt-50199.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/28/romina-ashrafi-outcry-in-iran-over-so-called-honour-killing-of-14-year-old-girl


* THE TRAGEDY OF SADIA SHEIKH





NB: This blog claims that reincarnation through inbreeding (with honor killing as collateral damage) is a deeply ingrained sexual instinct from Homo erectus. But then this is genetically passed on from father to son. Cultural transmission is not decisive*In addition, it must be testosterone controlled. Young men have a higher testosterone level. So Mudusar Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim's brother may be right that their fathers were not (directly) involved in the murder and they indeed acted on their own, igniting earlier than their fathers:

* Honor killing is not supported by the Quran and has been a taboo topic of discussion within and between rural families in Pakistan and Iran for the past 1,400 years. Families also had virtually no contact with each other and cultural transmission across families was therefore less likely, although honor killings occurred on a large scale and almost identically across families.







These people had no idea what was really happening to them:






(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)


Honor killing proneness of a family




A measure of possible incidence of honor killing in a family with fertile and marriageable females is the product of 'the sum score of the probabilities of DID for all males' and 'the inbreeding coefficient of that family', divided by 1 or the number of fertile female candidates willing to marry by consanguinity.


Coefficient of Inbreeding:


The Coefficient of Inbreeding (as proposed by Sewell Wright in 1922) is the probability that two alleles at a randomly chosen locus are identical by descent. Note that alleles may be identical for other reasons, but the inbreeding coefficient is just looking at the mathematical probability that the alleles have come from a common ancestor.

The Coefficient of Relationship (R) looks more a descriptive statistic of consanguinity relations within families. For example a father and his child have 50% of their genes in common. The same for two siblings. So it is not directly a probability for specific individual situations.






Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

(441) Honor Killing in Islamic Culture

Honor killing in Islamic culture


Fallacy of Islam:
You cannot change an inbred population ex cathedra into an outbred population:


Reincarnation is a super strong Sexual Instinct (SI). Resurrection is just an empty word:

































PREFACE:

THE TRUE MYTH OF ABRAHAM:




THE LIE IN ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS:



The false myth of Abraham is a deliberate distortion of history by Desert Religions. 
This blog is based on bottom-up religious research:

PRIMATE RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENT






THE SOLUTION TO HONOR KILLINGS:

RELIGIONS ARE PROJECTIONS ON BREEDING




INBREEDING & ISLAM



GENESIS COMES FROM HOMO ERECTUS' INBREEDING CULTURE, 
BUT THEY ALSO PRACTICED OUTBREEDING.



PARADISE CULTURES






INBREEDING IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH OUTBREEDING:
REINCARNATION IS A STRONG SEXUAL INSTINCT 
FROM HOMO ERECTUS. BUT RESURRECTION IS 
JUST AN EMPTY WORD FROM HOMO SAPIENS:


ACTUAL COURSE OF EVENTS


STATE OF THE ART: CAUSES OF HONOR KILLINGS ARE PLACED IN THE CONSCIOUS BY CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE:


STATE OF NATURE:
HOW ISLAM CAUSES HONOR KILLINGS THROUGH REPRESSION 
OF REINCARNATION IN THE UNCONSCIOUS OF MUSLIM MALES





ISLAM AS HYBRID RELIGION
















CHRISTIANITY USED AN ORTHOGONAL TRANSFORMATION NOT TO BE COMPROMISED BY THE MYTH OF PARADISE FROM HOMO ERECTUS:













(434) Fundamental principles of this blog

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES




This blog doesn't follow history, 
it creates human religion:



FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THIS BLOG







THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF HUMAN 
RELIGION:

SEXUALRELIGION




RELIGIONS ARE RATIONALIZED SEXUAL INSTINCTS:

Think of gods as sexual roles.

- Then monotheism empathetically recognizes only male heterosexual roles in the conscious. Other roles are repressed to the unconscious. In Islam this leads to an unequal male-female relationship in sexuality: SM-dyad.

- But polytheism recognizes all sexual roles, including female sexuality, in the conscious. This leads to more feminine religions such as Christianity and Judaism. This leads to equality of female sexuality in Vanilla-dyad.
 
- Moreover, inbreeding is a male religion par excellence, while outbreeding in nature is a female religion to prevent species extinction.

- So if gods are sexual roles, then religion is a function of sexuality first and breeding second:

Homo sapiens, the deluded species

Monotheism= f(SM-dyad (Inbreeding)).
Polytheism= f(Vanilla-dyad (Outbreeding)).

Assumption 676: The Constitution of Multiculturalism.
Human religion is the rationalization of the male sexual drive in the unconscious, intended to coerce female sexuality for the pleasure of males.
Human religion is also a projection on breeding, where inbreeding cultures by definition treat people differently in terms of equality.
By providing protection for these discriminatory religions under the Moral Constitution of Western society, which purports to be the guardian of justice, the injustice of inbreeding cultures has been given a status of legal inviolability that is in direct conflict with the spirit of the Constitution.
In this way a Constitution has been created that protects inequality, murder and manslaughter.
This tragedy is the greatest fallacy of Western narrow-mindedness and conceit.
As the crowning glory of Western civilization, religion has long been seen as humanity's highest ethical value, protected by the United Nations Moral Constitution and Human Rights Watch.
But rarely has civilized man better demonstrated his moral incapacity. Therefore, in evolution, masochistic polytheism always digs its own grave, swallowed up by sadistic monotheism.








Assumption 677SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad. 

SM-dyad  is a sexual instinct caused by inbreeding and found exclusively in bipedal primates (humans). Animals do not systematically practice inbreeding and therefore have no need for SM-dyad. Animals would also not be able to control SM-dyad, which would lead to its dissolution into rape and murder and extinction of the species. After all, animal females would certainly disagree with the lustful masochism of human females, without which SM-dyad cannot exist. 

Vanilla-dyad emerged as a civilized cultural intervention on SM-dyad through human outbreeding. But SM-dyad is much stronger and will always prevail. Vanilla-dyad is not yet seen as a Sexual Instinct (SI) on this blogBut it is certainly possible that Vanilla-dyad still has some deep roots in animal sexuality, but not in contrast to SM-dyad.






































Further analysis





Breeding is a sexual instinct in the unconscious: But Breeding has also a sexual image in the conscious:


For thinking about Breeding in the conscious, we need first to transfer an image of the Sexual Instinct (SI) 'Breeding' from the unconscious to the conscious. This because one cannot consciously take the function Reinc.= f(Inbreeding). from the unknown sexual instinct 'Breeding' in the unconscious: 




Only Breeding is mentioned as Sexual Religion (SR) because it is the primal sexual instinct in the animal world. But actually Breeding is already combined in the unconscious with a lot of attached and conditioned specific instincts as Rebirth and Reincarnation.

Resurrection is no Sexual Instinct (SI). It's a made up idea of Homo sapiens. It is a powerless argument from a delusion and because it is not tied to the birth process it is not a sexual instinct:



But that is only a provisional convention because we see already in the projections below that Islam and Christianity are not completely determined by their projection on Breeding: 

(So, orthogonal to Breeding there are more predictor dimensions)



In a final convention we must be able to gather all newly created predictors of Islam and Christianity in the conscious, contributing to further updates and adaptations of their religions.

This means that a religion is first reformulated in the conscious mind and only later takes shape in the unconscious during evolution.  

That is also how reincarnation from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) became linked to the Sexual Instinct (SI) of Breeding. Reincarnation isn't really necessary for birthing, but because Homo erectus believed that for 2 million years, it became magically connected to and conditioned on Breeding.


















Reformulated religion:

The peacock's train is also only magically conditioned on breeding, it is not essential, because with cut trains the species will not die out and court behavior will change in further evolution, so this train is not essential for breeding.







(Reincarnation is also only magically attached to Breeding, because I do not think it exists in reality)

Why is Breeding that important? Well, Breeding is the primal determinant of sexuality. Even today, 85% or more of the world's religions are a projection on, or a function of Breeding:

'Religion' (shaping female sexual behavior) has been a function of breeding from the beginning of sexual life in nature. And now, in the 21st century, at least 85% of human religions are still functions of inbreeding or outbreeding



Sexual Instincts (SI) and Sexual Religions (SR)






Resurrection is just a powerless word, no sexual instinct and only an artificial function of Reincarnation:




Resurrection is just a powerless word, no sexual instinct: 










Projections on Breeding:








OUR STRATEGY REGARDING HONOR KILLINGS

The first reason Muslim culture has never solved honor killings is that they did not go through the Enlightenment and subsequent Romanticismthe latter of which put the spotlight on the unconscious in the Western world:




In the Muslim world, males hide their sexual identity in their unconscious, which has terrible consequences. Women, on the other hand, express their personality more in the conscious. 

Therefore Muslim males are monotheistic, but females are polytheistic: they do not suppress empathy for sexual roles in their unconscious. (On this blog, gods are sexual roles.)




Therefore, women oversee life much better in reality, which gives them power over men:




But although women are in power, they suffer terrible consequences from their lusty SM-dyad with men. And that's right, because there is no SM if not both parties are into it, because suffering is lust in masochism.




(If tomorrow a billion Muslim women were to reject SM-dyad and start to live in equality with men, without Sharia law, Islam would have to change, because it takes two to tango.)

A second reason Muslim culture has never solved honor killings is that a single honor killing sets a deterrent example for countless other Muslim girls, causing them to anxiously agree to 'cousin marriage'

But if Muslim girls had a sound theory, much of that fear would be allayed and they would arrive at rational judgments and decisions. They would develop an adequate strategy and be able to effectively avoid honor killing:

Then they would understand the following:






The tragic battle between an empty word and a super strong sexual instinct

The right theory always predicts the future. But for our purposes, we are just looking for any theory that rightly predicts honor killings. To this end and as our first assumption, we integrate 'reincarnation as a sexual instinct' as auxiliary hypothesis into our honor killing theory, which so far only focused on resurrection of Islam. It provides a theoretically perfect match for predicting honor killings. 




The second assumption underlying our theory is that in nature sexual instincts are conditioned on the birth process, on breeding, on procreating the species. Religion is also such a sexual instinct, where reincarnation is (magically) conditioned on breeding but resurrection explicitly not. Then, reincarnation is a strong sexual instinct but resurrection just a powerless word. Therefore Islam can never defeat its previous inbreeding culture by indoctrinating resurrection. Not in another 1400 years:




As long as Islam enforces resurrection in the conscious of Muslim males, honor killings will be created by reincarnation psychosis in their unconscious.


The lie of Desert Religions:

Desert religions don't deserve to be called 'Abrahamic Religions', because they
have stolen the myth of Abraham and reversed its original meaning completely to become surrogates of God on earth, substitutes that took away divine self-determination from tribal heads in reincarnation and instead replaced extreme inbreeding by resurrection in heaven. Only combating 'inbreeding through reincarnation' replaced with resurrection is to be commended. 





God, who is feared and honored by Islam for his misunderstood and alleged intention to slaughter a child, was in reality the compromise between reincarnation of Homo erectus and resurrection of Homo sapiens:




The concept of earthly reincarnation was developed much earlier than heavenly resurrection:




The festival of sacrifice shows the joy of Muslims because God is not as cruel as the myth of Abraham would indicate. God fulfills their unconscious and forbidden desire for reincarnation and combines it with resurrection. Here we see a joyful embrace of the fractured Islamic faith, in which suppressed reincarnation and enforced resurrection culminate in an annual burst of unified faith.






How to fight honor killings:

But there is a way out for Muslim women by raising awareness about the real nature of honor killings and thereby avoiding unwarranted trust in fathers or brothers, leading to the right avoidance strategy in time, as suggested on many places in this blog:







Muslim respect for women depends on submission

IT'S ALL ABOUT MORALITY
























Basic Dimension

(435) Introduction into bipedal primate religion


CREATION OF SEXUAL RELIGION (DID)




This blog doesn't follow history, 
it creates human religion



(434) Introduction into bipedal primate religion



But this does not apply to bipedal primates that left the forests and virtually no longer encountered each other. They often had to practice incest and inbreeding in order to survive at all:





Polytheism means that all sexual roles are experienced empathetically in the conscious (the ancient Greeks). But then eventually by mingling, the boundaries between cultures and races disappear. Then we get miscegenation and cultural identity loss (Christianity). Everything has its price and polytheism comes down to outbreeding and monotheism to xenophobia and inbreeding (Muslim faith):




The major difference between open (polytheism) and closed cultures (monotheism) is the close bond between members of the latter. While polytheism always disintegrates into separate individuals without any overarching sense of norms and values (American democrats after Christianity: Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Post Modernism, Wokism). This means that closely knit monotheistic cultures (Critical Race Theory, Muslim faith) always win out over polytheism in evolution, because ultimately only them can make a stand. That's why they are called 'superior religions', nothing to do with ethical quality:





Monotheism is ultimately stronger than polytheism in bipedal evolution. These religions alternate as ebb and flow throughout evolution. There is no substantive evolution in religion, the reason why Homo naledi respectfully kept its dead in the Rising Star Cave while modern humans set them on fire with clean energy:

















All human religions are basically derived from breeding. Only later derivatives move away from this basis:




Guess what, 'religion' (shaping female sexual behavior) has been a function of breeding from the beginning of sexual life in nature. And now, in the 21st century, 85% of human religions are still functions of inbreeding or outbreeding. Do you want better proof?




Islam is outbreeding established on its former inbreeding culture:
Here we need to make a clarification because we conveniently call Islam an inbreeding culture, which it still closely resembles as mixture with its former culture, but Desert Religions strove for outbreeding, in which Islam failed miserably:




Religions are male control over female behavior. They arise from each other as derivatives of previous functions and sometimes drift away from breeding:





Religious space is derived from the physiological sexual space in the brain. Religion is an interpretation of sexuality. Animals have no religious space, so sexual space is in their unconscious as well as their conscious. But in humans sexual space is often repressed in the unconscious, while religious space is male's secret language-coded counterpart in the conscious:











Women are not sexually or physically attracted to male homosexual behavior, although they psychologically identify with Jesus:




So, to deceive women, males condemned homosexuality to the unconscious (DID). Also because otherwise monotheism would become polytheism on accepting homosexuality as 'a second god'as a second empathetically felt sexual role in the conscious. 

And so, an interesting interaction arose between 'religion' and sexuality, between conscious religion (monotheism) and unconscious sexuality (homosexuality), in which one feels the contradiction, the flaw in trying taking over God's identity. Because men must be like God to rule over women and therefore they absurdly deny their possible homosexual roots in their awkward homo-erotic relationship with God:





So to sexually dominate women, heterosexual men are conditional, and there are no two flavors in that. Is this then a sexual consideration in the unconscious or a religious one in the conscious? It is both, an interesting combination, where empathy with homosexuality in the conscious would amount to acceptance of a second sexual role as a second god. 

But then male power over women would disappear and SM-dyad would switch from monotheism to Vanilla-dyad of polytheism, in which women should be given equal sexual rights, which is contrary to monotheism.

That is the unsolvable dilemma of sneaky monotheism: Needing a homo-erotic relationship to worship their heterosexual God, but at the same time appearing heterosexual in order to oppress and impress women:

Monotheism:




The ancient Greeks believed that the gods took on sexual roles in their contact with humans. But because we don't believe in gods, the ancient Greeks simply worshiped sexual roles as gods. So we turn this around.




If women are not empathetically worshiped in the conscious, then they are objects from Adam's rib. As befits an inbreeding culture, Eve then had the same DNA as Adam, meaning that female DNA was plowed back into the male bloodline through cousin marriages (extreme inbreeding).





Polytheism and monotheism are the axis around which human cultures revolve. It gives direction to the archetypes of 'Religion', 'Law' and 'Dialectic process between the sexes':








Polytheism:














 

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.  
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality
 

 




Only for women is god space identical to the full 5-dimensional sexual space. After all, women themselves belong to 'other sexual roles' on the third dimension. So they already feel empathy with other sexual roles in their conscious. Note that empathy is different from sympathy. (Note also that it is not really a rank 5 space, but two space. It is 5 principal components.)

But in men, sexual space shrinks in their conscious towards adulthood to only one empathetic dimension: male heterosexualityMen are therefore disabled where the religious bond between the conscious and unconscious is concerned:


Assumption 68: In humans, the number of gods in the archetype of God is by nature unlimited (polytheism), with SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) of the space of gods. By testosterone (monotheism) this number of god factors is gradually restricted to one dimension, called SM-dyad or Allah construct. With estrogen multi-dimensionality remains unaffected. This means that males tend to monotheism and females to polytheism. 




(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam




(NB: rank less than 5. Five principal components)

Assumption 68: In humans, the number of interdependent gods (n) in the polytheistic space of gods (rank=m=5 vectors) in the archetype of God (rank=p=5 factors) is unlimited, with the SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) (p=1). SM-dyad is called 'monotheism' otherwise. With male testosterone this space will be gradually restricted to only one conscious dimension (p=1), the SM-dyad or Allah-construct, named otherwise monotheism or sadomasochism. Remaining (m-p=4) components are relegated to the unconscious. But in case of estrogen all sexual factors (p=5) remain unaffected in the conscious of women.

Note that religious space is a male interpretation of sexual space, which was not necessary if sexual space was lived fully and empathetically in the conscious. Note also that SM-dyad in bipedal sexual space is identical to monotheism in god space, although with different perspectives (see blue picture with the archetypes above) both dimensions may differ slightly from each other.







Although 'other sexual roles' have been repressed to the unconscious in monotheism, this does not mean that they no longer play a significant role (DID). Examples include 'masochism hate' and 'masochism fear', while 'reincarnation psychosis' also arises in the unconscious as cognitive dissonance with 'resurrection' in the conscious:




In monotheism we can say that men are blind (black) to empathy for other sexual roles that are not worshiped in their religion:









(Egotheism from Australopithecus)

AdamVerily I say unto thee, I have created God as my likeness. His gratitude was great and I got the dominion over all creation. That I also get eternal life.

AdamImmortality is all that God could give to me. In my children my strong body rushes to eternity. They are like God as my likeness. So I will survive forever and be an example for humanity. Yes, indeed, I am a God in the deepest of my thoughts.

Adam: Eve, come to your senses, thou hast no soul. Thou art like a goat. Only men have a soul. Hast thou a soul than thou were a man. Thou are not a man, so do not fall into circular reasoning. Be satisfied with my beautiful body and do not talk of God, unless to praise me.
















(436) Creation of Honor Killings























ROMINA ASHRAFI












'Teenage girl Romina Ashrafi from the northwestern city of Talesh had fallen in love with a man in his thirties and ran away after her father objected to a marriage. After returning home last week, her father beheaded her in her sleep, reportedly with a sickle. The father then reported himself to the police. Agents are said to have found the father with the bleeding murder weapon in his hand.'

'Romina Ashrafi ran away from home with her 34-year-old boyfriend after her father banned them from getting married, Arab news channel Al Jazeera reports. However, the couple was found by police five days later. Although Romina told them she feared for her life, officers sent the teenager back home to Talesh, a small town more than three hundred kilometers northwest of capital Tehran.'











Next picture was made in 2010, long before the death of Romina Ashrafi in 2020.



In rural Muslim arias there has been virtually no contact between males for 1400 years. No information exchange about honor killings, no communication whatsoever. And since 'honor killings' is not glorified by the Koran, this was an additional taboo for communication. But how is it possible that Muslim males have been killing their daughters all over the place in exactly the same way all this time? There was no cultural transmission. There remains only one possibility. Reincarnation as breeding-conditioned Sexual Instinct (SI) became frustrated by Islam's prohibition of reincarnation, with an identical result everywhere: honor killings, where the unconscious drive to reincarnation in descendants was stifled by Islam and frustrated by Muslim women.






Honor killing can technically be traced to a sick and twisted love affair based on the father's religious displeasure. Its roots lie in pedophilia and stem from the first bipedal primates. Pedophilia is a human religion that should be seen as perpetual orgasm across generations in this lifetime:










Boring cousins

Assumption 156: Incest was the first form of perpetual orgasm: timeless orgasm across generations. Earthly reincarnation as a second form offered endless orgasm in the afterlife of the tribe. But the prospect of the same unattractive cousins and sisters appeared no promise but a curse:





Therefore Homo sapiens invented the parallel universe. It was the flight to an unknown paradise where one could have perpetual orgasm with 72 beautiful fresh woman slaves 
from other tribes on an entirely new dimension (Outbreeding). It comes down to never ending orgasm, the center of gravity of human male religion.





In our working model we distinguish five areas of sexuality: 
heterosexualityhomosexualityfemale sexual rolespedophilia and bestiality. This five-dimensional space also is the power space of males, on which all human power is projected:

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality







INSTITUTIONALIZED DISSOCIATIVE IDENTITY DISORDER (DID)

THE BREEDING GROUND FOR HONOR KILLING IS A DUAL PERSONALITY FROM COGNITIVE DISSONANCE BETWEEN REINCARNATION AND RESURRECTION. AS SAID BEFORE, AN IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENT IN THIS IS FROM PEDOPHILIA TO PERPETUAL ORGASM, WHICH IS THE REAL BREEDING GROUND OF THIS CRIME ON THIS BLOG.
























In addition to autosomal recessive disorder, there is another way that leads to distortion of the inbred population:















How Honor Killing works:



Assumption 612Reincarnation psychosis:

The father is unaware of the following unconscious scenario:

Step 1: The father loves his little girl in a normal father-daughter relationship.

Step 2: So, he is not a psychopath and thus can only become psychotic.

Step 3: The daughter becomes sexually mature.

Step 4: Reincarnation instinct awakens in the father.

Step 5: The father gets into a 'transient psychosis'.

Step 6: His love gradually turns into a sick 'love', in which he unconsciously 
claims his daughter as a necessary intermediary for his own reincarnation.

Step 7: He looks for a genetic match within the family: cousin marriage.

Step 8: He does not want to reincarnate into hybrids of other (hostile) tribes, other religions, or unbelievers. The reincarnation instinct stems from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and here concerns the inbreeding culture.

Step 9: The father argues that consanguineous marriages are culturally and socially favored, what must be seen as 'psychological sublimation', as the process of deflecting sexual instincts into acts of higher social valuation.

Step 10: But his daughter still refuses forced marriage.

Step 11: Then, the father enters a stone-cold psychosis, he is shocked, caught by his daughter's betrayal of his 'love'.
 
Step 12: He unconsciously considers not being able to return to the safety of the tribe after his next death after reincarnating into a hybrid offspring of his daughter. Thereafter, he will no longer belong to the family. This comes down to suicide in the afterlife, because other (hostile) tribes will refuse him too. He will be wandering through space like a ghost forever.

Step 13: The father is overcome by 'tribal separation anxiety'.

Step 14: The relationship with his daughter (as a subject) deteriorates in his conscious. This worsens if she argues with him or leaves home for a longer time.

Step 15: The father unconsciously sees his daughter increasingly as an object, as an incubator for family semen. At some critical moment, for example when she comes home after a while to make up for it, the bomb burst and the balance of Sexual Scales turns to the wrong side. 

Step 16: Then, the father opts for 'psychological displacement' and turns his imminent tribal suicide on his daughter and kills her.

Step 17: Now he will not have to reincarnate into a hybrid and will come back probably into another family member.

Step 18: Resigned, he accepts his punishment, knowing that he has taken the right step inwardly and with a clear conscience.

Step 19: Honor killings are committed from a sick, twisted form of 'love' from reincarnation psychosis in the unconscious.

Step 20: The reincarnation instinct itself cannot be eradicated, but psychosis resulting from cognitive dissonance in the unconscious, can be avoided through timely awareness in the conscious.





How to inform Muslim girls about the 
true nature of honor killing:



THE KEY TO THE SOLUTION OF 
HONOR KILLINGS

HONOR KILLINGS ARE NOT INVINCIBLE. IF THE CAUSE OF HONOR KILLINGS WOULD BE GENERALLY KNOWN, THIS WOULD IN MY OPINION IMMEDIATELY LEAD TO A REDUCTION OF HALF THE NUMBER OF CASES. NOW THE MOST PESSIMISTIC ESTIMATE OF HONOR KILLINGS IS 40,000 CASES WORLDWIDE EVERY YEAR. I THINK TO HAVE DEVELOPED THE RIGHT THEORY TO STOP HONOR KILLINGS. WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT IN THE MOST OPTIMISTIC CASE 20,000 HONOR KILLINGS PER YEAR WOULD BE PREVENTED THROUGH AWARENESS.  AND ROMINA ASHRAFI WOULD STILL BE ALIVE.



























































Quick Scan Honor Killings:

Assumption 604Quick Honor Killing Checklist:

A: REINCARNATION KILLINGS:

1. The victim is a female relative and died by murder.
2. The perpetrator is a male relative. 
3. The combination of 1 and 2 almost certainly indicates a reincarnation killing if one or more of the following conditions are met:

   - Rape of the victim by a not relative.
   - Loss of virginity of the unmarried victim.
   - Pregnancy of the unmarried victim.
   - Abortion by the victim.
   - Refusal of forced marriage.
   - Adultery committed by the married victim, unless with 
     another relative.
   - Dating non-Muslims.
   - Western lifestyle.
   - Victim is an outcast and/or a family council preceded the 
     murder.

* Abortion is the open nerve of reincarnation.

The above characteristics mostly seem to refer to acceptable female sexual behavior. It is therefore completely incomprehensible that Muslim males condemn this with murder as result. And by the way, what moral high way are they referring to when they cut their daughters to pieces?

No, science is completely wrong, because Muslims don't know themselves, don't know their own unconscious:



The real cause of honor killings must be their repressed reincarnation instinct. Only that fits the primal equations of Human Religion: HR = f(SR) and HR2 = f (HR1).


HONOR KILLINGS SERVE AS A MODEL FOR ALL THE ILLOGIC OF THE MUSLIM FAITH


REINCARNATION PSYCHOSIS

ARE YOU A MUSLIM MAN FROM ARAB OR NORTH AFRICAN DESCENT? THEN YOU POSSIBLY HAVE INHERITED 'REINCARNATION PROJECTION IN YOUR DESCENDANTS BY INBREEDING', FROM HOMO ERECTUS: E.G. COUSIN MARRIAGE OR OBLIGATION TO MARRY A MUSLIM. THIS UNCONSCIOUS AND ON SEXUALITY (BREEDING) CONDITIONED INSTINCT* CAN CAUSE HONOR KILLINGS, WHICH YOU DON'T REALIZE. ANY MUSLIM WHO KILLS A FEMALE FAMILY MEMBER IS PROBABLY SUFFERING FROM REINCARNATION PSYCHOSIS. SO BEWARE OF WHO YOU ARE.

* A peacock's train is also not essential for breeding. Like reincarnation, it is a breeding-conditioned and attached Sexual Instinct (SI):

 

(413) The Conclusive Theory of Honor Killings (Suicide)🔴🔴


This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:


Honor killings cannot be understood only from the conscious behavior of Muslims. 
Then finally conscious reasoning would be taken as the cause of honor killing:
e.g. Western lifestyle of the daughter, etc. 

But 'Western lifestyle' is only symptom of the real underlying unconscious cause of honor killings: The killer is unaware of his second and hidden personality: 
(Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)). Little does he know that he has entered a 
reincarnation psychosis, which led to the death of his dearly beloved daughter. Only the unconscious provides real clues to honor killings.





'The mere perception' might be concluded from the outside, but honor killers have unconscious reasons at a deeper level. There is no way to square this circle. Any understanding of honor killings needs the unconscious to avoid the absurd logic of mainstream science today. 

This means that in my view the murderer is legally guilty but not yet morally, until he has knowledge of his real motivation and only then he is also morally guilty. 










THE CAUSE OF HONOR KILLINGS

MUSLIM CULTURE IS A FOSSILIZED CULTURE THAT HAS MISSED A NUMBER OF DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES FROM WESTERN CULTURE. FOR EXAMPLE, THEY MISSED THE ENLIGHTENMENT AND ROMANTICISM. AND WESTERN CULTURE OWES ITS INTEREST IN THE UNCONSCIOUS TO THE LATTER. AND THE EXPLANATION FOR HONOR KILLINGS CAN ONLY BE FOUND IN THE UNCONSCIOUS. 






MUSLIM CULTURE INTEGRATES THE UNCONSCIOUS BLUNTLY INTO THE CONSCIOUS, WHICH LEADS TO IMPOSSIBLE SITUATIONS. AS AN EXAMPLE, REINCARNATION IN THE UNCONSCIOUS DOES NOT GO TOGETHER WITH RESURRECTION IN THE CONSCIOUS WITHOUT INSOLUBLE PROBLEMS, THAT CAN ONLY BE SOLVED BY MAGICAL THINKING. AND THAT'S THE CAUSE OF HONOR KILLINGS.







This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:



Assumption 639: The cause of Honor killings.
Honor killings are caused by a combination of two effects: the conscious and the unconscious

The conscious: 

In the ancient chimpanzee instinct, the male blood line is protected by killing males from other tribes, while young females are free to leave. This means that the male kin bloodline is based on male inbreeding, but the exchange of females turns it all into outbreeding:


In the Muslim population this chimpanzee instinct is still active, but now by killing males and females who do not serve the male kin bloodline by not entering into cousin marriages:











Assumption 639: The cause of Honor killings.

As said before: Honor killings are caused by a combination of two effects: the conscious and the unconscious







The chimpanzee instinct itself is too weak to explain the murder of Romina Ashrafi. But it acted as a guideline in her father's conscious. This means that the chimpanzee instinct indicated the domain in which Romina's murder would be committed:




This means that the chimpanzee instinct indicated the domain in which Romina's murder would be committed.




The unconscious: 

But to actually commit the murder, a reincarnation psychosis in her father's unconscious was necessary. Often women are murdered by psychotics who project into them a sick love that is not reciprocated. That is also what happened to Romina Ashrafi:










The father unconsciously realized that maybe hybrid descendants would be born from his daughter in which he should reincarnate and that after his next death he will be refused by his tribe, because he is now unclean, a hybrid. Then he would wander aimlessly in space forever:





He can only prevent this expected suicide in the afterlife by killing his daughter now, in this life:



But why he kills his daughter he cannot say and comes up with silly characteristics that all together point into the same direction, to reincarnation psychosis:




Honor killing definition from Humans Rights Watch:




That is why the murder of Romina Ashrafi is the cross product of her father's conscious and unconscious strivings.





FINAL CONCLUSION HONOR KILLINGS:

Assumption 640A failed reincarnation projection is the necessary and
sufficient condition for honor killings.

In contrast to chimpanzees, foreign male intruders in Muslim tribes are not automatically killed. Because Muslim fathers may accept marriage partners who are not family members. 

That is why the male bloodline is necessarybut not a sufficient condition for honor killings in the conscious. Necessary, because fathers do weigh their decision within the male bloodline domain. So, the male bloodline is the first selection criterion for possible marriage partners of their daughters in the conscious, e.g. Third cousins (Thrice removed).
 



Based on the horror about honor killings within the Muslim community, the male bloodline is not seen as a morally acceptable reason. And that's why we will not find the real reason for honor killings in the conscious.




In the unconscious we find the reincarnation projection within the domain of the male bloodline of the father. His male DNA is a necessary condition for the reincarnation projection, because he wants to reincarnate into his own family DNA.

This means the unconscious reincarnation projection comes down to the necessary
and sufficient condition for honor killings in the unconscious as well as in the conscious. Which means that all those incomprehensible honor killings in the Muslim culture ultimately are predicated on an unconscious sexual instinct: Reincarnation through inbreeding.

The final conclusion is that honor killings are caused by a failed reincarnation projection of Muslim males into offspring from female tribal members, females who do not accept breeding within the male bloodline.




Assumption 641
All honor killings in Muslim culture are essentially based on a twisted and sick form of love from a failed reincarnation projection, even if we only notice hate, while 'love' cannot be affirmed.




This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:
















Basic Dimension





(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder


DISSOCIATIVE IDENTITY DISORDER (DID)







Dissociative Identity Disorder is the scientific sequel to Split Personality Disorder and Multiple Personality Disorder of the past. Persons can have different subpersonalities, which sometimes go their own way without the person noticing.

Well, reducing the tangle of syndromes to useful diagnostic tools, makes it clear that diversity of psychological disorders is difficult to handle for psychoanalysts.

So far, only alters have been discovered that have a clear relationship to the person and are therefore identified. Or through anamnesis by psychoanalysts, alters are discovered that were not yet known to the individual. But then one crosses the line into an infinite number of dissociated alters which possibly only operate as flashes in the universe of our brain and thereby unnoticed adjust our behavior. So dissociative identities may not know boundaries and criteria in DSM-5 are illusive or must only be seen as state of the art:




For our purposes, the repressed reincarnation personality in the unconscious is important. The would-be honor killer does not know his reincarnation alter - which has become a sexual instinct since Homo erectus - because he represses reincarnation on pain of death in Islam (severe religious indoctrination is seen as youth trauma for Muslim boys).

Unconscious subpersonalities are located in the unconscious. It seems like a circular argument, but we have good reason to believe that a repressed personality that worships reincarnation is hiding in the unconscious minds of many Muslims. In principle, we do not need to go any further in our analysis. 

The mere fact that the adjective 'unconscious' denotes the entire group of unrecognized sub-personalities known as Dissociative Identity Disorders (DID), simply shifts our attention from disorders themselves to the unconscious as basic characteristic. So we are not specifically concerned with Split Personalities, Multiple Personalities or Dissociative Identities, but only with the place where they are hiding, in the unconscious.

On the one hand, it is true that Reincarnation DID seems far removed from what is usually thought of as DID, split personality or multiple personality. But on the other hand Reincarnation DID may be a special case that corresponds well with DID in broader terms. 

Now we are not specifically concerned with DID itself, but with early warning signs for Muslim girls associated with comorbidities of this disorder or whatever it is:

In general:


- Honor killers sometimes say they remember little about the murder, which is more common in general but might also indicate DID. Further, honor killers do not know what moves them other than conscious reasons such as 'Western lifestyle' or 'she refused her cousin', etc., and that is more important for the discussion. Because it is completely unbelievable to chop your daughter into pieces because of her Western clothing. What then is your own moral high ground???

- Certainly also a loss of identity if our theory is true, because they do not consciously know about a reincarnation projection in their daughter's descendants. So they do not understand that their repressed dissociative identity has to do with their repressed reincarnation instinct.

They often seem to have lost their sense of self, are confused and in shock and are looking for the missing personality that should explain their behavior. Well, read the court records about mental confusion of the perpetrators

                                                            --------
                                                

So, we would like to include in our analysis a number of characteristics of Dissociative Identity Disorder, or whatever it is, as comorbid disorders and as early warning signs for Muslim girls to honor killings. And in addition to being alert to already known determinants to honor killings in the conscious, such as refusing cousin marriage, etc., we now also want to identify psychological characteristics of the would-be perpetrators that can warn for honor killings, as follows:


More specific for honor killings, we tentatively conclude:



In our opinion, the breeding ground for honor killing is a dual personality born from cognitive dissonance between reincarnation and resurrection. As said before, an important development in this is from pedophilia to perpetual orgasm, which is the real breeding ground for honor killings on this blog.

In other words:

Dissociative identity disorder (DID):

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a condition marked by the presence of two or more distinct personalities within one individual. The mental health condition, which used to be called multiple personality disorder, is one of the dissociative disorders listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).

A person with DID will experience the presence of two or more distinct identities or personalities, also known as alters. These personalities recurrently take control of the person's behavior and they often experience a loss of memory of what happened while another personality or alter was in control.

Insertion:

'Particular identities may emerge in specific circumstances. Transitions from one identity to another are often triggered by emotional stress':

End.

The criteria require that an individual be recurrently controlled by two or more discrete identities or personality states, accompanied by memory lapses for important information that is not caused by alcohol, drugs or medications and other medical conditions such as complex partial seizures.[3]


Dissociative disorders all have a central feature of "dissociation,” or a disruption in the normally integrated functions of consciousness, memory, identity, and perception.




But there is a problem with the DSM-5 criteria. They only apply to currently known forms of DID. Many unknown forms of dissociated identities are still to be expected whose characteristics have yet to be determined. We expect reincarnation DID also a supposed split personality that has been broadly defined on this blog, but most of its characteristics are still unknown.








Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

For guidance:

Religious indoctrination e.g. contempt for women and repression of reincarnation, is not yet seen as terror leading to DID. But the state of the art of science is not the benchmark of the state of nature. For the time being, I see religious repression and indoctrination as a special case leading to DID. But it may ultimately be a related disorder.

In fact, it concerns a dissociated personality in the unconscious, within which a reincarnation psychosis develops leading to honor killing on female family members. But the precise disorder must lead us to meaningful comorbidities to warn Muslim girls for male family members.

                                                         -------         

What It's Like To Live With Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0kLjsY4JlU



                            

It is normal for children to start in childhood with a multidimensional personality. After a number of years, these unite into one harmonic personality. But if traumas develop in early childhood, such as child abuse, [for example forceful religious indoctrination], then personality does not close harmoniously. 

In this way numerous subpersonalities or alter egos can continue to exist independently, each with a special function, such as protection against child abuse. The therapy must therefore be aimed at achieving a harmonic closure of the personality later on.

(41:26/59:34) People's identity can change, sometimes against their will. In above case, the lady might think to be the central figure, dividing the roles, but maybe she herself is also under control by one of the other personalities, you never know the real coordinator in DID.

The lady in the video above told that it is nonsense that one of her personalities would kill people, that only happens in movies. Well, we respect that. But she had 11 personalities, 7 of which are unknown.

Transferred to the case of honor killers, we need an unknown personality in the unconscious (reincarnation) and a known personality in the conscious (resurrection). 
We also need a third role as a homunculus, as a divider of roles, as a role dispatcher, the coordinator. But that's the critical point in DID: maybe no one keeps track of the personalities, which is why we speak of dissociative identities. 

The lady in above video might think to be the role dispatcher, but she doubts because of her 7 unknown personalities. Perhaps she herself is the mouthpiece of an unknown personality and that's scary.







So reincarnation is repressed by Islam to the unconscious. But that doesn't mean that both personalities can't work together. And that's exactly what they do, without the would be honor killer knowing:




The only thing we need is role reversal from the conscious to the unconscious, where 
reincarnation psychosis has now driven the father (brother) to madness. And without the honor killer actually realizing the real motives of his actions, he kills his own daughter (sister).



'Particular identities may emerge in specific circumstances. Transitions from one identity to another are often triggered by emotional stress':






Romina's father knows that he is wrong in the conscious, but vaguely feels he is right in his unconscious: split personality (DID):




Most important about reincarnation psychosis is the unpredictability of the
unconscious. The would-be perpetrator naturally does not know his unconscious, but feels sinister and depressed. He feels there is another personality in the game that he can't control. And indeed reincarnation has been repressed to the unconscious for the last 1400 years under penalty of death. The unconscious is a dissociative identity from his conscious. He has Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)



The unknown unconscious is quite normal by definition, but in this case it makes him a time bomb:



He becomes frightened and depressed and clings to his daughter. He wants to reincarnate in her descendants, but does not know aware. He loves his daughter dearly, but confuses this merging with her entity. And when she is not willing to marry his nephew (his stand-in), his unconscious sounds alarm and he enters a stone cold reincarnation psychosis:














The father unconsciously realized that maybe hybrid descendants would be born from his daughter in which he should reincarnate and that after his next death he will be refused by his tribe, because he is now unclean, a hybrid. Then he would wander aimlessly in space forever. 


He can only prevent this expected suicide in the afterlife by killing his daughter now, in this life. 


But why he kills his daughter he cannot say and comes up with silly characteristics that all together point into the same direction, to reincarnation psychosis:


BELOW: 'The mere perception' might be concluded from the outside, but honor killers have unconscious reasons at a deeper level:



'The mere perception that a woman has acted in a manner to bring "dishonor" to the family is sufficient to trigger the attack'. That's the wrong conclusion drawn by Westerners, by outsiders. It does not do justice to what the perpetrator regards as  'sufficient' in his unconscious. And that is the main part of his decision-making process, even though he does not realize. It is true that because he does not know his unconscious, he also defends his act from his conscious. But psychoanalysts have no message to this.

' And that is the main part of his decision-making process, even though he does not realize:'



Thirteen years ago, when I started my previous blog, I realized that honor killers should be psychopaths from the Human Rights Watch definition. But I also knew that  these 
proud and loving fathers had their toddler daughters on the laps at the time. Therefore, honor killers are generally not psychopaths, but psychotics who are terrorized by unconscious fears.







See (76):
Assumption 663: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection.
Assumption 664: Asexuality in heaven for souls and outbreeding for resurrected bodies (art 428). (428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi










IS AL GEPLAATST !!!





CREATION OF THE MYTH OF PARADISE

(432) How Jewish scholars tricked the 
'God of inbreeding' into Outbreeding

This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:







There are two strong assumptions underlying the following Genesis analysis:

1: First assumption is that religion is a projection on breeding. Therefore Genesis shows the fight between the ancient bipedal inbreeding instinct and the desired 
outbreeding of Desert Religions.

2) Desert Religions tried to prevent 'reincarnation by inbreeding' by replacing the afterlife with resurrection in heaven (outbreeding).

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, all sought to prevent 'reincarnation by inbreeding' 
through the promise of outbreeding (Muslims) or asexuality (Christians) in heaven. Jewish scholars forced the bipedal 'God of Inbreeding' to outbreeding from Homo sapiens with a clever trick. Muslim scholars made Adam eat from the 'forbidden' Tree of Life.













































Islam also swapped the Tree of Life (Tree of Inbreeding) with the Tree of Knowledge (Tree of Outbreeding). They said that Adam was forbidden to eat from the Tree of Inbreeding, which was a lie, but then they refused to let Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge, because then a woman would get the honor of Outbreeding.

Before Islam, eternal life (earthly reincarnation) was combined with profane power. Below, Satan offers earthly power, possession and immortality in a Kingdom that never decays in this universe:














There are two strong assumptions underlying the above Genesis analysis:

1: First assumption is that religion is a projection on breeding. Therefore Genesis shows the fight between the ancient bipedal inbreeding instinct and the desired 
outbreeding of Desert Religions.

2) Desert Religions tried to prevent 'reincarnation by inbreeding' by replacing the afterlife with resurrection in heaven (outbreeding).

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, all sought to prevent 'reincarnation by inbreeding' 
through the promise of outbreeding (Muslims) or asexuality (Christians) in heaven. Jewish scholars forced the bipedal 'God of Inbreeding' to outbreeding from Homo sapiens with a clever trick. Muslim scholars made Adam eat from the 'forbidden' Tree of Life.


Assumption 545: First Hominid and Australopithecus instincts.
As early as 14 million years ago, the first bipedal primates developed inbreeding and fertility stress as instincts to survive on the plains of Africa. In order for this combination to work, inbreeding with the own females in the male kinship line was forced.

Assumption 514Outbreeding is nature's primary sexual law. The first bipedal primates were forced to inbreeding, which became a hereditary Sexual Religion (SR). Because Australopiths had a vastly varied genome, such as chimpanzees, they did not easily die out. But for Homo sapiens with its impoverished genetic variability, inbreeding caused severe autosomal recessive disorders that were devastating to his survival.

Assumption 617
Resurrectionists (Desert Religions 4,000 years ago) understood that the Gestalt of  body and mind is more than the mind alone. And therefore they proposed resurrection over reincarnation. They insisted on the divinity of the body, because without a body the mind cannot be formed. All surrounding stimuli come to the mind through the body. So, the real identity of a person is not his body nor his mind, it is the Gestalt which is more than the parts. So, in reincarnation, the reborn spirit cannot be the same as the earlier mind. Well, here they were in good company of Homo naledi with Rebirth (Homo naledi (3,2 Mya - 236 Ka; 550cc).

Assumption 663: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection.

- Homo erectus (2,1 Mya; 900cc) discovered the soul, needed for reincarnation in the offspring of its inbreeding culture, although there were also outbred populations. 
- But reincarnation was far from perfect, because ancestors never got their original genome back after reincarnation in later descendants, which hopefully were no hybrids as the Apple from Eve and the Serpent from another tribe. Because then, after their next death, ancestors would not be accepted in their own tribe anymore, because now they had become hybrids themselves (reincarnation psychosis). That's why Muslim males commit honor killings.
- Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1440cc) discovered resurrection in the parallel universe.
- Desert Religions wanted to end massive inbreeding by telling believers that earthly reincarnation does not return the original genome to ancestors, who clearly lost their body in this process.
- They proclaimed ex cathedra that upon resurrection in heaven their bodies would be completely reconstructed by God in their original genome. This was called physical resurrection in heaven. Now this is not the Christian point of view but the Muslim belief, which are also not allowed to believe in the soul, because not necessary in heaven.
- But reincarnation is a sexual instinct while resurrection is just a powerless word. That's why the Muslim faith became a hybrid religion of earthly reincarnation (Inbreeding (cousin marriages)) and heavenly resurrection (Islam, outbreeding).
- The point is that Homo naledi made the wisest choice, he also believed in physical resurrection, not in heaven but on earth. Furthermore, he needed no soul and in doing so had found a parsimonious variant of human religion. Homo naledi was a brilliant 'animal' with his 'orange' brain. He invented the most elegant and perfect form of human religion, 
although he was only an Australopith.



What the Paradise story really means in the animal world. 

It is a ritual to warn young males of the adulterous behavior of females, to prevent foreign male DNA from entering the tribe's male bloodline. Thus Adam was instructed to prevent Eve from running off with the Serpent from another tribe and not to accept their child, the Appleas his child.

But still a step further back in the animal world and beyond animals that live in groups, we see the myth as a male sexual instinct to avoid strange offspring in females.

The paradise story is therefore basically a primal sexual instinct in the animal world to protect the integrity of species.

Because we believe that we can derive the paradise myth from a sexual instinct from the animal world, we conclude that an outcrossing culture such as Judaism has changed the paradise myth by moving the trees in the garden. If our premise is true, then we can now chart the entire evolution in this regard, as follows:





HAAL DEZE VAN SEXRELCONCEPT !!!






EVOLUTION OF THE MYTH OF PARADISE

(433) Evolution of the Myth of Paradise

This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:





What the Paradise story really means in the animal world:

It is a ritual to warn young males of the adulterous behavior of females, to prevent foreign male DNA from entering the male bloodline of the tribe. For example, Adam was instructed to prevent Eve from mating with the Serpent from another tribe and not to accept their child, the Appleas his child.

But one step further back in the animal world and beyond animals that live in groups, we see the myth as a male sexual instinct to avoid strange offspring in females.

So the paradise story is actually a primal sexual instinct in the animal world to protect the integrity of species. Where subspecies can be mixed, the Paradise myth comes into effect...

The desire for outbreeding is unlimited in nature, only limited where mixing of species is not possible. And where subspecies can be mixed, the Paradise myth comes into effect...

The Tree of Life is the Tree of Inbreeding

When we realize that the Tree of Life in evolution has always been the Tree of Inbreeding and the Tree of Knowledge, the Tree of Knowledge of autosomal disorders, then inbreeding religions always remove the Tree of Knowledge from the Garden of Paradise. Conversely, outbreeding religions will remove the Tree of Life.


When we realize that the Tree of Life in evolution has always been the Tree of Inbreeding and the Tree of Knowledge, the Tree of Knowledge of autosomal disorders, then inbreeding religions always remove the Tree of Knowledge from paradise. Conversely, outbreeding religions will remove the Tree of Life.




Evolution of the Paradise Myth:

Red arrows point to the Tree of Life and pink to the Tree of Knowledge:









CREATION OF THE MYTH OF ABRAHAM


This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:









CREATION OF THE SACRIFICE FEAST (DID)


This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:



The Unconscious Meaning of the Sacrifice Feast

Islam is a monotheistic religion. Allah is God in Heaven of the parallel universe. There can be no other gods in any universe. Muslims can only resurrect in Heaven. That is why their old faith of reincarnation into descendants in the earthly universe by inbreeding is banned on pain of death. And therefore Abraham had to kill his only son Isaac. Then the cycle of earthly reincarnation was definitely interrupted.

Islamic monotheism is not a natural adhered religion, but is sexual terror, enforced on pain of death. Then, earthly reincarnation as major reinforcer of the inbreeding instinct has gone underground into the unconscious of Muslims.

But the Sacrifice Feast is contrary to this prohibition and is therefore celebrated with intense joy every year. Somehow reincarnation into descendants is approved anyway. If Muslims realized the real meaning of the Sacrifice Feast it would have been forbidden officially.




REINCARNATION PSYCHOSIS








This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:



The false myth of Abraham is a deliberate distortion of history by Desert Religions. This blog is based on bottom-up religious research:








THE CAUSE OF HONOR KILLINGS

MUSLIM CULTURE IS A FOSSILIZED CULTURE THAT HAS MISSED A NUMBER OF DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES FROM WESTERN CULTURE. FOR EXAMPLE, THEY MISSED THE ENLIGHTENMENT AND ROMANTICISM. AND WESTERN CULTURE OWES ITS INTEREST IN THE UNCONSCIOUS TO THE LATTER. AND THE EXPLANATION FOR HONOR KILLINGS CAN ONLY BE FOUND IN THE UNCONSCIOUS. 

MUSLIM CULTURE INTEGRATES THE UNCONSCIOUS BLUNTLY INTO THE CONSCIOUS, WHICH LEADS TO IMPOSSIBLE SITUATIONS. AS AN EXAMPLE, REINCARNATION IN THE UNCONSCIOUS DOES NOT GO TOGETHER WITH RESURRECTION IN THE CONSCIOUS WITHOUT INSOLUBLE PROBLEMS, THAT CAN ONLY BE SOLVED BY MAGICAL THINKING. AND THAT'S THE CAUSE OF HONOR KILLINGS.















Notice, initially inbreeding was not promoted but condemned by Islam. Therefore, Islam changed the narrative of Paradise essentially and let Adam eat from his beloved Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life). So Islam definitely reversed the meaning of the Myth of Adam and Eve. Because Adam had fallen for genetic monoculture of the Tree of Life, he had to leave Paradise. Maybe he ever will ever be admitted into Heaven of the parallel universe at doomsday.


Before Islam, eternal life (earthly reincarnation) was combined with profane power. Below Satan offers earthly power, possession and immortality in a Kingdom that never decays in this universe:



The false myth of Abraham is also a deliberate 
distortion of history by Desert Religions:




What really happened with desert religions in their interpretation of the Myth of Paradise

Most interesting Christianity (outbreeding) kept the Jewish paradise story intact (Eve chose the Tree of Knowledge), but later added eternal life in Heaven of the parallel universe through the suffering of Christ. Notice, they used an orthogonal transformation not to be compromised by the Myth of Paradise (inbreeding):




Islam on the other hand ruined the Jewish story in a very intelligent way (They took the chance to let Adam eat from the Tree of Life) and so they made a direct connection with the parallel universe. This because Allah rejected the Tree of Life as form of earthly reincarnation and wealth. By this brilliant trick Islam needed no orthogonal transformation but was left with a mess of oblique transformations between heavily correlating universes:





In the Koran, Satan tempted Adam to eat from the Tree of Physical Immortality (Tree of Life) to live forever in this universe as a rich man.
 But he could otherwise have received eternal life in heaven of the parallel universe if he had not eaten from that tree. Therefore, Adam did not obtain eternal life in heaven:





It is astonishing to see how both versions are basically the same. In fact Islam and Christianity draw the same conclusion from the Myth of Paradise. Both reject earthly reincarnation (or the earlier genetic immortality in descendants) and choose for resurrection into Heaven of the parallel universe. Realize Judaism did not belief in the parallel universe at all, only into a kind of massive rebirth of their people or not at all in the afterlife:

(121) Blood and organ donations in hybrid Islam

Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2, from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] .The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law. 


Resurrection in desert religions

https://islamqa.info/en/10769

107690: Ruling on organ donation

Praise be to Allah.

In the answer to question no. 49711 we stated that the (scholarly) view that it is permissible to donate organs is most likely to be the correct view, so long as the donation will not lead to the death of the donor.

http://www.questionsonislam.com/article/organ-transplantation

Resurrection and sins committed with that organ.


The majority of ahl as-sunnah scholars and Islamic theologians think that resurrection is going to be physical in the hereafter and human beings are going to be resurrected with their souls and bodies, called to account and be rewarded or punished. The Koranic verses seem to support this view (see Ta Ha 20:55, al-Hajj 22:5, 7; al-Nur 24:20, Ya Sin 36:78-79, al-Qiyamah 75:34). The fact that resurrection is going to be physical (with body) plays a role – partly though – on people’s hesitation about organ transplantation. However, when the issue is examined deeply, it is seen that organ transplantation is not directly related to resurrection; or more properly that organ transplantation has got nothing to harm the belief of resurrection because the transplanted organ is going to be returned to its real owner. Actually, it does not prevent organs to be resurrected with their real owners even though they decayed under soil, burnt to ashes, or eaten by animals. As a matter of fact, the Koran states that one’s organs are going to be gathered together with the slightest details in the hereafter (al-Qiyamah 75:34). Islamic scholars, judging from this proof and the likes, have concluded that everyone is going to be resurrected with their own organs.

BD: Resurrection of the own body - with or without soul - must be seen as rebirth. This, because the soul is not essential for rebirth, only the revival of the body counts. Islam needs no soul. 'Rebirth with a soul' is a regression to the animal state of 'rebirth without soul', since nowadays believers cannot deny knowledge of the soul which animals do not have. 


                                                  ------------------------------------


Resurrection of Jesus

The resurrection story appears in more than five locations in the Bible. In several episodes in the Four Gospels Jesus foretells his coming death and resurrection, which he states is the plan of God the Father.[24] Christians view the resurrection of Jesus as part of the plan of salvation and redemption by atonement for man's sin.[25] Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2, from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law. The Pharisees, whose views became Rabbinic Judaism, eventually won (or at least survived) this debate. The promise of a future resurrection appears in the Torah as well as in certain Jewish works, such as the Life of Adam and Evec 100 BC, and the Pharisaic book 2 Maccabeesc124 BC.[27]
However, 1st century Judaism had no conception of a single individual rising from the dead in the middle of history. The historical Jewish concept of resurrection was that of a redemption of the whole people.[28] Their concept was always that everybody [sleeping forever, BD] would be raised together at the end of time [Rebirth, BD]. So the idea of one individual rising in the middle of history was foreign to them.[29]


                                                  ------------------------------------





See (76):
Assumption 663: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection.
Assumption 664: Asexuality in heaven for souls and outbreeding for resurrected bodies (art 428). (428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi

























Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), is caused by Islamic repression of Reincarnation, while Reincarnation is a true (but magical) derivative of Breeding. Reincarnation is also a Sexual Instinct (SI).  

Islam replaced Reincarnation by Resurrection on the right but the latter has nothing to do with Breeding. Resurrection is no Sexual Instinct (SI)Therefore, Resurrection is a meaningless word and does not belong in the equation below.

Indeed, Resurrection is Human Religion (HR), but not a Sexual Instinct (SI). Therefore, Resurrection can never beat Reincarnationwhich is why Islam had to indoctrinate its faith for already 1400 years.



























Reincarnation is a Human Religion





















THE KEY TO THE SOLUTION OF 
HONOR KILLINGS

HONOR KILLINGS ARE NOT INVINCIBLE. IF THE CAUSE OF HONOR KILLINGS WOULD BE GENERALLY KNOWN, THIS WOULD IN MY OPINION IMMEDIATELY LEAD TO A REDUCTION OF HALF THE NUMBER OF CASES. NOW THE MOST PESSIMISTIC ESTIMATE OF HONOR KILLINGS IS 40,000 CASES WORLDWIDE EVERY YEAR. I THINK TO HAVE DEVELOPED THE RIGHT THEORY TO STOP HONOR KILLINGS. WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT IN THE MOST OPTIMISTIC CASE 20,000 HONOR KILLINGS PER YEAR WOULD BE PREVENTED THROUGH AWARENESS.  AND ROMINA ASHRAFI WOULD STILL BE ALIVE.


Most important about reincarnation psychosis is the unpredictability of the unconscious. The would-be perpetrator naturally does not know his unconscious, but feels sinister and depressed. He feels there is another personality in the game that he can't control. And indeed reincarnation has been repressed to the unconscious for the last 1400 years under penalty of death. The unconscious is a dissociative identity from his conscious. He has Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

The unknown unconscious is quite normal by definition, but in this case it makes him a time bomb. He becomes frightened and depressed and clings to his daughter. He wants to reincarnate in her descendants, but does not know aware. He loves his daughter dearly, but confuses this merging with her entity. And when she is not willing to marry his nephew (his stand-in), his unconscious sounds alarm and he enters a stone cold reincarnation psychosis:



The father unconsciously realized that maybe hybrid descendants would be born from his daughter in which he should reincarnate and that after his next death he will be refused by his tribe, because he is now unclean, a hybrid. Then he would wander aimlessly in space forever. 


He can only prevent this expected suicide in the afterlife by killing his daughter now, in this life. 



But why he kills his daughter he cannot say and comes up with silly characteristics that all together point into the same direction, to reincarnation psychosis:


BELOW: 'The mere perception' might be concluded from the outside, but honor killers have unconscious reasons at a deeper level:




'The mere perception that a woman has acted in a manner to bring "dishonor" to the family is sufficient to trigger the attack'. That's the wrong conclusion drawn by Westerners, by outsiders. It does not do justice to what the perpetrator regards as  'sufficient' in his unconscious. And that is the main part of his decision-making process, even though he does not realize. It is true that because he does not know his unconscious, he also defends his act from his conscious. But psychoanalysts have no message to this.

Thirteen years ago, when I started my previous blog, I realized that honor killers should be psychopaths from the Human Rights Watch definition. But I also knew that  these 
proud and loving fathers had their toddler daughters on the laps at the time. Therefore, honor killers are generally not psychopaths, but psychotics who are terrorized by unconscious fears.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx













Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a condition marked by the presence of two or more distinct personalities within one individual. The mental health condition, which used to be called multiple personality disorder, is one of the dissociative disorders listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).

Dissociative disorders all have a central feature of "dissociation,” or a disruption in the normally integrated functions of consciousness, memory, identity, and perception.

Assumption 668: Honor killing proneness

Muslim fathers (brothers) who suffer from a long-term depression (stable negative), or who are subject to severe mood swings, may well have a greater proneness to honor killing. 

These include: dissociative identity disorder  (DID), major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychotic disorder, substance use disorder, seizure disorder and personality disorder. 

Anyone without a tidy and stable character (stable positive) can pose an honor killing hazard.


See (76):
Assumption 663: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection.
Assumption 664: Asexuality in heaven for souls and outbreeding for resurrected bodies (art 428). (428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      


ISLAM CAUSES HONOR KILLINGS:


















ISLAM LOOKS LIKE AN AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE DISORDER SYNDROME






On leaving Africa about 60,000 years ago 















Map of the migration of modern humans out of Africa, based on mitochondrial DNA




'In the Arabian Peninsula, 50 thousand years ago, there were no other people and there was no central public administration and therefore these 150 pioneers lost track of juvenile descendants of the group. Likely sub-tribes fanned out across the Peninsula in a very early stage and did not keep track on each other. They must have built a symbolic wall around their own subgroup (endogamous tribal mantle) and let no uncontrolled females escape to other groups. So, they must have developed their notoriously hostile relations among Bedouin tribes already in an early stage of evolution.'




Assumption 276On leaving Africa inbreeding cultures likely entered a harsh desert like environment in the Levant or on the Arabian Peninsula, which changed sexual culture and religion dramatically. Desert life facilitated rigid cultures with order and regularity needed for inbreeding across generations. In later period increased tribal density caused to enlarge the number of inbred bodies to outnumber neighbouring hostile tribes with reincarnated ancestors. A regular society and the need for population growth were impetus for the notorious incubator farms of family semen which are still characteristic for nowadays Islam.




Assumption 277The last possible origin of cousin marriages lies in the Arabian Peninsula about 50,000 years ago, where first human families (mtDNA =L3N) could not exchange fresh juvenile females with other tribes and desperately had to find new formulas to exchange females within just a few families. This measure from the time derivative of sexual culture might have become instinctive 'religion' for Muslims:










Assumption 278: About 40.000 years ago Homo sapiens (mtDNA = L3N) returned from the Arabian Peninsula and Europe to North Africa, where they developed as Berbers or Imazighen:




The last moment to form the Muslim inbreeding instinct must have been about 45 thousand years ago on the Arabian Peninsula (Saudi Arabia), though it is not certain for L3N might have been formed earlier in Africa. Also, it might have entered the world along the Nile and through the Levant (Israel) in the first wave Out of Africa (115.000 - 130.000 ya).]




Assumption 328: Cousin marriages are the canary in the coalmine of earthly reincarnation and the inbreeding instinct:





Assumption 329: Forty thousand years ago pre-Muslims left the Arabian Peninsula and migrated to Europe and North Africa. The Peninsula was their last chance to develop their characteristic inbreeding instinct - out of their nasty habit of cousin marriages - before they fanned out to all directions.

Assumption 330: Haplo-groups N from L3N and M from L3M, both groups from mtDNA, are sibling-groups what means both might be connected with the inbreeding instinct in nuDNA.




Assumption 280: Three elements likely caused the emergence of the Muslim instinct, which is male as well as female kin bonded in nuDNA to inbreeding and incest. This mutational abnormality is unprecedented in other inbreeding cultures, which are only bonded in the male lineage and where females are refreshed completely every generation (chimps, bonobos, Australopithecus africanus, Neanderthals and Aboriginals). This can be seen from mtDNA which is the same for males but different for females, which also have different nuDNA:




1: Inbreeding promotes tribal identity by genetic immortality in descendants since the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc), the primal human-creature religion. Tribal identity revives in Muslim cultures in Western society today. Tribal identity is male and female kin bonded.

2: And since Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) inbreeding also promotes the earthly reincarnation of Muslim fathers into descendants of their children.

3: And last but not least on the Arabian Peninsula (50 ka; 1400cc; mtDNA L3N) inbreeding was the only way to survive without the possibility to exchange fresh juvenile females. Nowadays perpetuation of this behavior despite adequate fresh juvenile females indicates an inbreeding-instinct mutation:



Inheritance patterns:


Resume:

Assumption 329: Forty thousand years ago pre-Muslims left the Arabian Peninsula and migrated to Europe and North Africa. The Peninsula was their last chance to develop their characteristic inbreeding instinct - out of their nasty habit of cousin marriages - before they fanned out to all directions.

Assumption 330: Haplo-groups N from L3N and M from L3M, both groups from mtDNA, are sibling-groups what means both might be connected with the inbreeding instinct in nuDNA.














How the Muslim Faith will fall apart (Art. 444)














You can save this 'offline reading' on your computer and also save the information on  USB stick. But beware that flash drives deteriorate over time so you need to refresh them regularly from your computer:




SanDisks are made of aluminum as protection against EMP (Electronic Magnetic Pulse). Wrap all your USB sticks in aluminum foil as standard.




HOMEPAGE

No comments:

Post a Comment