Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
Someone asked me why Resurrection (HR) is a function of Breeding (SR), where resurrection is not a physical function of breeding, because resurrection and rebirth start the afterlife in one's own body. So, no breeding is necessary with resurrection:
In contrast, reincarnation and genetic immortality means coming back to life in another body that requires physical reproduction. So only reincarnation has a direct and natural connection to breeding:
And resurrection came late after Homo erectus, it came with Homo sapiens:
And resurrection is just a word, while reincarnation is a Sexual Instinct (SI).
Reincarnation is from Homo erectus and already 2 million years old. So, resurrection has no genetic significance, because it involves no breeding:
But resurrection has a different kind of connection with breeding. It is a relationship based on time causality by time-lag, because resurrection of Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc) came after reincarnation of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). And therefore, resurrection is linked conceptually to breeding through reincarnation.
Resurrection arose from the idea of the parallel universe of Homo sapiens. The question was whether people would get their afterlife on earth through reincarnation or in heaven through resurrection. So, resurrection arose from reincarnation through the further development of religious concepts by humans, that is the meaningful and causal connection.
Furthermore, about 10,000 years BC, Desert Religions decided resurrection as a remedy for reincarnation, because it did not require further inbreeding for the earthly afterlife. Also monotheistic terror tried to deprive tribal heads (polytheism) of their power over the afterlife by reincarnation.
So there are at least four legitimate reasons for the connection between resurrection and inbreeding through reincarnation.
1: Simple time causality by time-lag over reincarnation to inbreeding.
2: Conceptual dependency on reincarnation as an alternative afterlife.
3: Replacement of reincarnation to prevent autosomal recessive disorders.
4: Deceit of the people by monotheistic terror to disable polytheistic reincarnation by resurrection.
So, a physical connection is not always necessary between resurrection and inbreeding. There are enough other legitimate cause-effect relationships.
But an assumed time causality between HR2 as a function of HR1 with no underlying theoretical basis can easily be based on a fake causality or a false correlation. So there is a limitation to this rule and later religions are not always functions of former
religions on face value.
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
Someone asked me why Resurrection (HR) is a function of Breeding (SR), where resurrection is not a physical function of breeding, because resurrection and rebirth start the afterlife in one's own body. So, no breeding is necessary with resurrection:
In contrast, reincarnation and genetic immortality means coming back to life in another body that requires physical reproduction. So only reincarnation has a direct and natural connection to breeding:
And resurrection came late after Homo erectus, it came with Homo sapiens:
And resurrection is just a word, while reincarnation is a Sexual Instinct (SI).
Reincarnation is from Homo erectus and already 2 million years old. So, resurrection has no genetic significance, because it involves no breeding:
But resurrection has a different kind of connection with breeding. It is a relationship based on time causality by time-lag, because resurrection of Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc) came after reincarnation of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). And therefore, resurrection is linked conceptually to breeding through reincarnation.
Resurrection arose from the idea of the parallel universe of Homo sapiens. The question was whether people would get their afterlife on earth through reincarnation or in heaven through resurrection. So, resurrection arose from reincarnation through the further development of religious concepts by humans, that is the meaningful and causal connection.
Furthermore, about 10,000 years BC, Desert Religions decided resurrection as a remedy for reincarnation, because it did not require further inbreeding for the earthly afterlife. Also monotheistic terror tried to deprive tribal heads (polytheism) of their power over the afterlife by reincarnation.
So there are at least four legitimate reasons for the connection between resurrection and inbreeding through reincarnation.
1: Simple time causality by time-lag over reincarnation to inbreeding.
2: Conceptual dependency on reincarnation as an alternative afterlife.
3: Replacement of reincarnation to prevent autosomal recessive disorders.
4: Deceit of the people by monotheistic terror to disable polytheistic reincarnation by resurrection.
So, a physical connection is not always necessary between resurrection and inbreeding. There are enough other legitimate cause-effect relationships.
religions on face value.
But besides fake causality, religions such as Resurrection can also depend on previous religions (Reincarnation) through magical thinking. For example, where Islam enforces resurrection in response to reincarnation for religious reasons to honor their monotheistic God. Well, to be specific, only their believers think of a magical heaven in the parallel universe, while monotheistic terror itself thinks of worldly power and autosomal recessive disorders, both of which, by the way, are real connections between reincarnation and resurrection.
This means time-causality by time-lag can indicate a fake relationship, based on some spurious relationship, but time-causality can also be based on magical religious reasons, such as with resurrection above. Well, that's fake too, but you haven't heard that from me.
So magical thinking is based on fake relationships? Yes, but only if physics is the norm, the measure. But in reality, magical thinking also makes real connections, which should not be ignored as genuine relationships.
This means time-causality by time-lag can indicate a fake relationship, based on some spurious relationship, but time-causality can also be based on magical religious reasons, such as with resurrection above. Well, that's fake too, but you haven't heard that from me.
So magical thinking is based on fake relationships? Yes, but only if physics is the norm, the measure. But in reality, magical thinking also makes real connections, which should not be ignored as genuine relationships.
Another kind of causality is when events are just closely related and then real-time causality is possible as well for a lot of accidental reasons.
For example, in the present days Islam still suppresses (in real-time) reincarnation through enforced resurrection by religious indoctrination. So, that's quite a different kind of cause and effect in which time-causality by time-lag is substituted for real-time dependence.
But in the flow chart below, there is also a direct theoretical connection for Christianity from resurrection back in time (retrospective) to base, back to outbreeding. To realize that Christianity had to make this trade-off as well.
Christianity as an outbreeding culture made an easy choice for resurrection, because also in heaven they need no inbreeding:
The other connection of Christianity goes back to outbreeding through reincarnation from Homo erectus and is a time causality by time-lag caused by the intellectual development of religious concepts between erectus and sapiens.
For example, in the present days Islam still suppresses (in real-time) reincarnation through enforced resurrection by religious indoctrination. So, that's quite a different kind of cause and effect in which time-causality by time-lag is substituted for real-time dependence.
But in the flow chart below, there is also a direct theoretical connection for Christianity from resurrection back in time (retrospective) to base, back to outbreeding. To realize that Christianity had to make this trade-off as well.
Christianity as an outbreeding culture made an easy choice for resurrection, because also in heaven they need no inbreeding:
The other connection of Christianity goes back to outbreeding through reincarnation from Homo erectus and is a time causality by time-lag caused by the intellectual development of religious concepts between erectus and sapiens.
So, regardless of any causality, there are also substantive connections that must be reflected in the flowchart below.
Therefore, this is not just a time-dependent flowchart, but more a relational diagram:
1: Resurrection is not a physical function of breeding and has no natural connection to inbreeding.
2: But resurrection has a different kind of connection with breeding. It is a relationship based on time causality by time-lag, because resurrection of Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc) came after reincarnation of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). So the connection between resurrection and inbreeding goes through reincarnation. It is a conceptual connection.
3: A physical connection is not necessary when resurrection is seen as a cure for reincarnation, because resurrection does not require further inbreeding for the afterlife and spares autosomal recessive conditions. This is another cause-effect relationship.
4: An assumed time causality with no underlying theoretical basis can be a fake causality or a false correlation. So there is a limitation to this rule, since later religions are not always functions of former religions.
5: Most religious relationships are based on magical thinking. For example, on this blog we think the Myth of Abraham (the real myth) is based on magical thinking between reincarnation and resurrection.
So, religions (Resurrection) can be genuinely dependent on foregoing religions (Reincarnation) by magical thinking (the real myth of Abraham), while there is no physical relationship between them concerning breeding. Where reincarnation is a sexual instinct, but resurrection is not. So, magical thinking is based on fake relationships? Yes, but only in physics, because magical thinking also makes real connections, which should be seen as genuine relationships.
4: If events are closely related, real-time causality is possible for a lot of different reasons. For example, In the present days Islam still suppresses (in real-time) reincarnation through enforced resurrection. So, that's quite a different kind of cause and effect in which time-causality is substituted for real-time dependence.
Because the relationship between reincarnation and resurrection has enormous social consequences, it is good to put it on paper.
ADDENDUM:
2: But resurrection has a different kind of connection with breeding. It is a relationship based on time causality by time-lag, because resurrection of Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc) came after reincarnation of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). So the connection between resurrection and inbreeding goes through reincarnation. It is a conceptual connection.
3: A physical connection is not necessary when resurrection is seen as a cure for reincarnation, because resurrection does not require further inbreeding for the afterlife and spares autosomal recessive conditions. This is another cause-effect relationship.
4: An assumed time causality with no underlying theoretical basis can be a fake causality or a false correlation. So there is a limitation to this rule, since later religions are not always functions of former religions.
5: Most religious relationships are based on magical thinking. For example, on this blog we think the Myth of Abraham (the real myth) is based on magical thinking between reincarnation and resurrection.
So, religions (Resurrection) can be genuinely dependent on foregoing religions (Reincarnation) by magical thinking (the real myth of Abraham), while there is no physical relationship between them concerning breeding. Where reincarnation is a sexual instinct, but resurrection is not. So, magical thinking is based on fake relationships? Yes, but only in physics, because magical thinking also makes real connections, which should be seen as genuine relationships.
4: If events are closely related, real-time causality is possible for a lot of different reasons. For example, In the present days Islam still suppresses (in real-time) reincarnation through enforced resurrection. So, that's quite a different kind of cause and effect in which time-causality is substituted for real-time dependence.
Because the relationship between reincarnation and resurrection has enormous social consequences, it is good to put it on paper.
ADDENDUM:
No comments:
Post a Comment