(412) To The American People (about racism)

 Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive 

(412) To The American People (about racism)

(412) To The American People (about racism)

US upgrade 'Basic Models of Racism'

Preface:

It is clear that the process of human racism can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. 

Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integration, assimilation and segregation. It is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. Their biggest problem with racism is identity politics, which is the resulting meaning of racism:

Assumption 627: Identity politics:

Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religion, race, social background, class or other identifying factor develop political agendas based around one or more of these categories.

Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Racism is part of identity politics.

The first bipedal primates assumed that the appearance of individuals of a certain subspecies could be equated with their (deviating) tribal identity. Therefore, they easily confused the individual with his group based on external features.

 

Basic Models of racism:

1: The Native-Immigrant Model (Mod 1:NI)

In the Native-Immigrant model different races or ethnicities compete for the same land. This model follows a mutual racist-racist model, called a sadist-sadist relationship. 

The ultimate result of this armed peace might be the integration of groups.

- The evolutionary goal of racism is to manage conflict on an individual level to prevent intergroup civil wars.

Assumption 623: The intent of Racism.

Racism tries to achieve symbolic balance between cultures, between tribal identities, bringing races or ethnicities into the cultural harmony of integration and assimilation. And of course those are almost always unpleasant corrections from both sides.

Native-Immigrant Model (Mod 1:NI)

In our model of racism, we started with the Native-Immigrant Model as the standard method of how human populations integrate in the evolution. 

In (Mod 1:NI), both groups are racist to arrive at integration and assimilation:

Assumption 626: Racial weights: Tribal identities between cultures must be harmonized for integration towards assimilation. This is achieved through the racial weight of one's own culture on the tribal identity of the other.

The attempted extermination of Native Americans in America was systemic racism of Western immigrants. Even not verbally articulated, it was an ideological goal in itself.

2: The Master-Slave Model (Mod 2:MS)

The Master-Slave model shows a sado-masochistic relationship between master and slave. In this, the slave race or ethnicity is incapable of defending itself against the master. It is the racist-antiracist model. This model always falls apart eventually.

One-sided assimilation from Black into White:

When racial weights are absent, assimilation between groups may have already taken place. But there can also be segregation through parallel societies. Finally, there may be forced one-sided assimilation of the Slave-race into the Master-race (see ADDENDUM).

The Racism Factor

- Mutual Assimilation means corresponding tribal identities (No racism).
- One sided Assimilation means partly cultural surrender (Racism possible).
- Integration means balanced by racism, without equal tribal identities.
- Segregation means no longer racism.
- Civil war means no segregation any more.

Assumption 636: Auxiliary hypothesis:

The Black-race is intrinsically non-racist and anti-racist in politics.

If slaves are not racist by nature, they deliberately don't put racial weight on the master race and their color is pink:

After slavery, this dependency relationship in the US has been partly continued in a unilateral assimilation from Black Into White:

Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)

1 x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

This raises the question of how far slavery uses to reflect a "natural" relationship. Blacks were misused in slavery but part of them still conform to the Master-Slave relationship from the slavery period. They continue on the same basis as in (Mod 2:MS) and carry the racist burden of the Master culture until the present day:

Refusal one-sided assimilation from Black into White:

But another part of the Black race went back to (Mod 1:NI), while stalled functionally fixed in (Mod 2:MS). And from (Mod 1:NI) this process disintegrated into (Mod 3:CS). Note they could not effectively defend themselves with racism in (Mod 1:NI) and remained functionally fixated in anti-racism. They simply avoided whites and established parallel inner cities in the South.

Note: There are two groups that reject unilateral assimilation into white culture. Above is about black people in the South. But part of the Mixed-race is also against unilateral assimilation for political reasons. But the Mixed-race does not end up immediately in Cultural segregation (Mod 3:CS).

Assumption 636: Auxiliary hypothesis:

The Black-race is intrinsically non-racist and anti-racist in politics.

3: The Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS)

As a result of (Mod 3:CS), concepts as 'Racism' and 'Anti-Racism' became meaningless because races no longer interacted:

The Cultural Segregation model is a combination of the Master-Slave model and the Native-Immigrant model after slaves became free. In this combined model, slaves did not integrate further into the master culture after liberation, but disintegrated into segregation in inner cities in the South:

So, in case Slave and Master did not interact after slavery, their integration process stalled in (Mod 2:MS), which otherwise could have evolved into the general sadist-sadist mode of (Mod 1:NI). But it failed. The process stalled in disintegration before segregation:

Mutual assimilation from Black and White:

Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolved into symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model (Mod 4m:MCI):

 

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Balanced by mutual racism)

4: The Mutual Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4m:MCI)

(Mod 4m:MCI) could have been the follow up model of (Mod 1:NI), but not easily of (Mod 2:MS), unless the functionally fixed relationship from (Mod 2:MS) changed into the satisfying cultural equation for integration between Master and Slave culture (Mod 1:NI), which ultimately could evolve into a mutual assimilation, which is rather doubtful:

So, in above models we do not really expect a fundamental behavioral change from the Black-race. More obvious is the one-sided assimilation of the Black race into the Master race by (Mod 4u:UCI):

Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity, (Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)

The auxiliary hypothesis

Proceeding with our model, we need the auxiliary hypothesis that this kind of slavery is not accidental but sort of a natural relationship. In history, Blacks have been in slavery for ages at Caucasians, at Muslims and Europeans. 

Only if slavery was felt as kind of natural relationship this prolonged dependency on the Master culture after slavery can be understood, because so many other peoples in the evolution have fallen for slavery but recovered their original tribal identities afterwards, I guess. Regardless, there seems to be a mutually beneficial symbiosis between black and white. Based on the economy, stupid.

And only if the black race - as auxiliary hypothesis - does not defend itself against Western culture, e.g. because it has an economic interest in doing so, is there room for a counter-reaction from the right side of the mixed race, which, as almost white, is still discriminated against on facial features:

The whiter part of the Mixed-race doesn't have this fatalistic and lethargic attitude of the pure Black race. This 'docile' attitude is an abomination to them. So, they go to war against the other Whites with shit arguments about White Supremacy and the like:

https://nmaahc.si.edu/learn/talking-about-race/topics/being-antiracist 

'No one is born racist or antiracist; these result from the choices we make. Being antiracist results from a conscious decision to make frequent, consistent, equitable choices daily. These choices require ongoing self-awareness and self-reflection as we move through life. In the absence of making antiracist choices, we (un)consciously uphold aspects of white supremacy, white-dominant culture, and unequal institutions and society. Being racist or antiracist is not about who you are; it is about what you do.'

Above sentences seem completely contrary to the premise of 'No one is born racist or antiracist'. We apparently have to walk all our life through a minefield of difficult choices. Why is that? Why would the author not warn white males for their awful racist instinct? To hide their racist heritage is the first elephant in the room. And the function appears to be to shock white males and let individuals discover in horror these abject feelings as their personal abnormality, as a disgusting aberration. White males are not normal people like us. And that's an unfair intro. 

So, now we have the auxiliary hypothesis by which political gangs can drive a wedge between unilateral assimilators (Blacks) and refusers (partly Mixed-race).

It does not matter whether the auxiliary hypothesis is correct. What matters is a good description of the State of Nature and making predictions about the future behavior of the Mixed-race and political gangs.

THE MIXED RACE:

This is why it went wrong in the US: It took to long to come to integration and assimilation:

It is clear that the process of human racism can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. 

Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integration, assimilation and segregation. It is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. Their biggest problem from racism is identity politics, which is the resulting meaning of racism.

The second problem generated by identity politics is to take no personal responsibility for life and to demand equality of outcome which ruins every society, instead of equality of opportunity which removes racism in the long run.

With racial cooperation bogged down in a one-sided assimilation of Black in White, which is the best solution, by the way, political gangs have come to grips with the integration process and are doing everything they can to bring about segregation and civil war:

5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Insincere Anti-Racism model is developed out of the former Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS), and nested in the general Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI). In this model a more or less undefined political actor takes the lead while invoking systemic anti-racism as ideology and confirming former slaves in the injustice that has been done to them, and fair enough, but at the same time inciting the public into counter-racism through outright aggression against the former Master race or ethnicity. And that's at odds with the anti-racism of their core ideology. This is not a fruitful path to integration, if that was the intention. But then, what is their intention? That's the question.

Many times in the evolution tensions between races or ethnicities have been hijacked by political gangs that took advantage of a hopeless stalemate between parties by expulsion or massacre of one of the parties. So, it is not especially the Master-Slave model (Mod 2:MS), which is the victim of external powers, but any hopeless situation can seduce a third party to incite civil war.

Well, racism-racism is exactly where (Mod 1:NI) is for, so counter-racism is not bad in principle, but certainly by honestly informing the people that they will be provoked into the right direction of counter-racism under the heading of anti-racism. That would be ethical and sincere.

And it must be said (Mod 1:NI) is intended to achieve integration and better not to segregate. "Anti-racism" of pushing agencies thus abuses the functional fixedness of the former sado-masochistic relationship in (Mod 2:MS), which has since evolved into a sadist-sadist environment through the liberation of the slaves (Mod 1:NI). 

Thus, anti-racism (Mod 5: IAR) interferes with the functional fixed racist-antiracist relationship nested in the racist-racist model (Mod 1:NI).

'Anti-racism' of (Mod 5: IAR) is therefore in parasitic symbiosis with the racist-racist model of (Mod 1:NI). The aim of this kind of anti-racism is to claim endless penance for the past and at the same time to aggressively demand more and more privileges without consideration. In effect, citizens are being held hostage by a misunderstood external source. It must be emphasized that there is of course also genuine anti-racism.

So, insincere anti-racism is initiated by an outside party with an interest in breaking the status quo, where natural integration is not obvious given the nature of parties to the conflict.

But as said before, Model (Mod 2:MS) could have found some sort of assimilation of the slave culture into the master culture. Then the real meaning of (Mod 5: IAR) would be to disrupt assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war.

Resume: The insincerity is that the external party does not really pursue anti-racism but outright aggression and counter-racism. They only sell their message this way. And in principle counter-racism would be no problem in (Mod 1:NI) if former slaves understood the real intention. However, the intention looks to worsen the relationship from Cultural Segregation (Mod 3:CS) to (Mod 5: IAR) by pretending to aim at (Mod 4:CI). Another option is (Mod 5: IAR) could intend to disrupt assimilation in (Mod 4:CI) and achieve segregation and ultimately civil war. In any case, it is risky to drag a group into an adventure that the majority apparently does not aspire to.

George Orwell: Animal Farm 1984:

The problem is that part of the mixed race has more white DNA than black, dependent on successive mingling:

They clearly cannot accept the racist treatment of Whites towards Blacks, which has become standard in American culture. 

Although possibly only 20% of the Mixed-race is more white than black, they try desperately to identify with blacks in order to turn the black community against whites:

They hinder unilateral assimilation by removing the white racist burden on the black scale and in the rebound inventing an entirely new postmodernist dogma of white male supremacy in power-driven hierarchies, placed on the whites' plate, making integration equilibrium impossible:

Their barely unconscious aim is to destabilize American society and plunge the country into misfortune:

General Model:

3: The Cultural Segregation Model (Mod 3:CS)

The Cultural Segregation model can be a combination of the Master-Slave model and the Native-Immigrant model after slaves became free. In this combined model, slaves do not integrate further into the master culture after liberation. 

Slave and Master remain functionally fixed in their former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS), which was expected to evolve into the general sadist-sadist mode of (Mod 1:NI). But it failed. This process possibly stalls in disintegration before segregation.

Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolves in mutual symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model  (Mod 4:CI). But this model will eventually disappear into the Mixed Race variant:

4: The General Cultural Integration Model (Mod 4:CI)

(Mod 4:CI) can be the follow up model of (Mod 1:NI), but not easily of (Mod 2:MS), unless the functionally fixed relationship from (Mod 2:MS) becomes the satisfying  cultural equation for integration between Master and Slave culture, which ultimately could evolve into mutual assimilation, which is rather doubtful:

MODEL ADAPTATIONS FOR THE US:

Mutual assimilation from Black and White (US version):

Another way of looking at it is that the former sado-masochistic relationship from (Mod 2:MS) evolved in symbiosis in the Cultural Integration model (Mod 4m:MCI). Very unlikely for the US because Blacks now will have to defend their tribal identity with racism. Black and White need racism in this model:

One-sided assimilation from Black into White:

The predator model: Political Gangs:

5: The Insincere Anti-Racism Model (Mod 5: IAR)

The Insincere Anti-Racism model is nested in the general Native-Immigrant model (Mod 1:NI). In this model (Mod 5: IAR), there is a more or less undefined political actor (GA), which takes the lead while invoking systemic anti-racism as ideology and confirming former slaves (SL) and Mixed Race (MR) in the injustice that has been done to them, and fair enough, but at the same time inciting the public into counter-racism through outright aggression against the former Master race or ethnicity (MA). This is not peaceful anti-racism, but malicious and highly aggressive racism, which wouldn't be a problem if it was frankly spoken.

And that's at odds with the so called "anti-racism" of the core ideology of the Gang (GA). This is not a fruitful path to integration, if that was the intention. But then, what is their intention? That's the question.

ADDENDUM:

The Racism Factor

- Mutual Assimilation means corresponding tribal identities (No racism).
- One sided Assimilation means partly cultural surrender (Racism possible).
- Integration means balanced by racism, without equal tribal identities.
- Segregation means no longer racism.
- Civil war means no segregation any more.

Integration starts with mismatched tribal identities:

When Slave tribal identity and Master identity do not fit:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)

1 x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity (a = Master racism)

(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (1 x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.

Slaves have no problems with Master identity.

1 x Slave identity = b x Master identity (b = Slave racism)

(1 x Slave identity) = (R(Sl) x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.

Master has no no problems with Slave identity.

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Mutual racism)

(R(MA) x Slave identity) = (R(SL) x Master identity). Balanced different cultures.

Both parties have problems with the other culture.

Assimilation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Mutual assimilation means matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism factor is 1 at both sides:

1 x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity.

      Slave identity = Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity match when RF = 1 for both sides:

(1 x) Slave identity corresponds to (1 x) Master identity, (No racism, 

assimilation achieved).

Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity, (Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)

1 x Slave identity = b x Master identity, (Balanced one sided racism: b = Slave racism)

a x Slave identity = b x Master identity. (Balanced by mutual racism)

Segregation means no racial weights applied upon the other party.

Segregation also means not matching tribal identities:

Then the Racism Factor is 1 on both sides, by definition for this inequality:

1 x Slave identity ≠ 1 x Master identity.

      Slave identity ≠ Master identity.

Master and slave tribal identity don't match with segregation.