Friday, 21 May 2021

(361) The Origin of the Myth of Paradise

 Basic Dimension

(361) The Origin of the Myth of Paradise

The Origin of the Myth of Paradise

The first paradise in the evolution was the earthly inbreeding culture.
For Desert Religions, the second paradise is outbreeding in heaven.

Christianity changed the Myth of Paradise:
Christianity rejected the earthly Inbreeding Paradise:

Christianity rejected the prevailing paradise story that comes from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) or earlier, after which the Romans invented an entirely new Myth of Paradise, which Christians believed. It took some time but Christians went over from earthly reincarnation (by outcrossing) to asexual resurrection in Paradise, in Heaven:




But Islam, as function of its former Inbreeding Culture, got into great difficulty with the new resurrection doctrine, because Asian and Arab Muslims had the inbreeding instinct. And there arose a hybrid mixture between earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection:




What we see in Islam is that Muslim males never fully believed in resurrection. And their interpretation of the Myth of Paradise is also at odds with the Jewish version that was accepted by Christianity. Islam simply reversed the roles of Adam and Eve, revealing a cardinal difference between inbreeding and outbreedingIn the original myth Eve was attacked on the Tree of Outbreeding (Tree of Knowledge), but Islam condemned Adam on the Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life) by forcing Muslims to resurrect in Heaven. This significantly complicated the plot.

So, there is a connection between reincarnation (based on inbreeding) and resurrection (based on asexuality, which in nature ultimately boils down to the primary sexual law of outbreeding):




Islam changed the Myth of Paradise:
Adam rejected resurrection in heaven:




In Islam, it was not Eve (original narrative), who was tempted by the Serpent to the (earthly) Tree of Outcrossing (Tree of Knowledge), but Adam who was tempted to the earthly Tree of Inbreeding, the Tree of Life (eternal existence of the male kin bonded lineage based on inbreeding). Earthly inbreeding thus became sin in Islam. And the implicit refusal of resurrection by Adam was seen as sin by God.

Projecting the conflict of 'reincarnation versus resurrection' onto the original Myth of Paradise, we get the following result:

Adam thus - 1400 years ago - rejected Resurrection in Heaven in favor of earthly Reincarnation based on inbreeding and was punished by God, who banished him from the heavenly paradise. 

Islam painted the negative from the tree of earthly eternity without suggesting the Tree of Knowledge as the positive on outbreedingSo, the earthly Tree of Knowledge does not refer to the heavenly Muslim paradise. Reincarnation Muslims might prefer earthly outcrossing to heavenly asexuality. 

But this abruptly closing the door to Heaven for Adam created a feminine Allah in Heaven. It created two Allah versions in the Muslim faith: the conscious version (resurrection) of Allah in Heaven (feminine Allah), and the unconscious version (reincarnation), which exists only in the unconscious of Muslim males. So, the expulsion of Adam by God had an adverse effect. And here came the cause of honor killings, because reincarnation went into hiding in the unconscious:




Not to forget that human religion started as a conflict between inbreeding and outbreeding, which was a terrible dilemma since the first bipedal primates left the trees for the savannas:







So, Homo sapiens had, besides forms of breeding, to make the additional choice between earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection. It turned out Desert religions placed an asexual afterlife in Heaven, what worked well for Jews and Christians but not for reincarnation Muslims, who also in Heaven wanted to be rewarded for inbreeding. And here for reincarnation Muslim asexuality boils down to its primal source: outcrossing.






But there is a deeper ground. The Myth of Paradise is a myth of bipedal primates following the Alpha male model. The Alpha male (read: tribal head) practiced inbreeding by fertilizing all females in the group. But it is natural law that females with a limited number of eggs (Eve) prefer outcrossing along the perimeter of the tribal area with males from other tribes (the Serpent). Therefore, the myth has traditionally been an initiation rite for younger males to check females on adultery, an instruction that doesn't require language in the animal world.

Well, here's the proof of the initiation ritual as myth of Adam and Eve: chimpanzees have the male blood relationship and live on the same tree for generations. They check the perimeter of their territory daily for alien chimpanzees that are always brutally killed.

In the time of Homo erectus, reincarnation believers from inbred cultures would have directly killed an adulterous woman, unaware that an ancestor had already descended into the fetus. And we know that this is still happening in contemporary Islam.

But nowadays Arab and Asian Muslims with the reincarnation instinct know, however, that with pregnancy the ancestor has already descended into the hybrid (the Apple). So the damage has already been done. 

Today this unconscious dilemma is often resolved with Solomon's judgment that the child is still born and then put up for adoption. But this strictly violates the theoretical rules of reincarnation. But by following the rules and killing the child also the ancestor would be killed, while he is already hybridized. So, kind of mercy for the ancestor.

Another deviation is that women who violate reincarnation standards are not always murdered, but are expelled from the group, the family. Regardless, reincarnation has been around for 2 million years, and rules are also subject to changes in evolution. (See below for reincarnation rules.)

Before the era of reincarnation of Homo erectus, individuals died and only their genes survived in the group (Genetic Immortality). Therefore, there was no need to be afraid of ancestors reincarnating in descendants of the Apple. So, in the original Myth of Paradise the Apple and Eve were not killed but expelled from the group, because Eve violated inbreeding rules. Adam was also driven out of the inbreeding culture, because he had ignored the warning of the initiation rite. He hadn't given much attention to the adulterous Eve, and besides, he naively accepted the Serpent hybrid as his child:

Assumption 281: The eternal identity of the tribe is male kin bonded and maintained only along the male gene line in the offspring. Thus, seed from aliens as the Serpent in a tribal woman as Eve does not belong to the tribe and must be eliminated or expelled. Adam, who recognized the fruit of the Serpent as his own child, was the stupidity at its best. Both Adam, Eve and the child of the Serpent were expelled. That's the original meaning of the Myth of Paradise as initiation rite and as severe warning for maturing boys.

Well, here's the proof of the initiation ritual as myth of Adam and Eve: chimpanzees have the male blood relationship and live on the same tree for generations. They check the perimeter of their territory daily for alien chimpanzees that are always brutally killed.

And the God of Inbreeding bellowed:


15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Again, the simple fact that Eve was not killed after she tricked Adam with the Serpent's child (the Apple), indicates that this myth must have been from well before the reincarnation period of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). It must even precede Australopithecus (4.3 Mya; 400cc). It's an initiation rite of the first great apes (14 Mya; 300cc), which left the trees for the savannas.

All this means that the Tree of Life did not refer to human life but to the inbreeding culture itself that was expected to last into eternity.

For outcrossing cultures as the Northern European peoples, which did not live in an earthly Inbreeding 'Paradise'it made no sense to expel Eve from the group. They normally mixed with other tribes (polytheism) and Eve demonstrated usual behavior. Therefore, the Romans changed the Myth of Paradise into something philosophical: man is evil by nature and Jesus had to take all sins on himself and die for the group. The ground of this is masochism, what is a natural part of polytheism, where women's roles (Mary) are also recognized in the conscious of males. And let's not forget the many Greek goddesses:




Further, Muslim scholars (1400 years ago) changed the Myth of Paradise for a very logical reason. They no longer wanted to protect the inbreeding culture, because Desert Religions wished to eliminate reincarnation based on inbreeding. They wanted to put a stop to the proliferation of autosomal recessive disorders. And with expelling Eve they just would protect the inbreeding culture.

Note that Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1440cc) is more sensitive to autosomal recessive disorders than previous Homo erectus (2.2 Mya: 900cc). Homo sapiens has a very depleted genome with the exception of the Bushmen of South Africa (San People), who have more genetic diversity in one tribe than the Chinese and Caucasians combined.

So, Christianity turned away from inbreeding, because it was embraced by outbreeding cultures and Islam because it wanted to turn reincarnation into resurrection in heaven of Allah. And of course, Islam also wanted to take over religious power from tribal heads (reincarnation means egotheism) as God's deputy on Earth. 

Thus, Islamic scholars did not expel Eve and spared the Tree of Outbreeding (Tree of Knowledge from autosomal recessive disorders). Instead, they attacked the Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life) and expelled Adam from heaven, because he chose 'earthly wealth, power and eternity of the inbreeding culture' over heavenly eternity, where earthly power and opulence clearly have no meaning.

So, it is important to realize that the new resurrection myth of Paradise runs counter to the interests of reincarnation Muslims. Therefore, Islamic resurrection must be indoctrinated for a lifetime to suppress the old instinct of reincarnation.





Were Desert Religions against Inbreeding or Reincarnation?

- The primal Myth of Paradise glorified the Inbreeding Culture on the Tree of life.

- But both Christianity and Islam rejected the Tree of Life's Inbreeding Culture as the earthly paradise. Both recommended Heaven for the eternal afterlife. In doing so, they rejected the primal myth:




- If it was just about  breeding, they would have recommended the outbreeding culture of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Outbreeding on Earth. But they didn't. 

- Christianity saw the Tree of Knowledge as mortal and recommended eternal life in Heaven. Islam, on the contrary, saw the Tree of Life (Tree of Inbreeding) as mortal and also recommended eternal life in Heaven. So, both Abrahamic religions recommended resurrection instead of outbreeding on Earth.

- This makes it clear that their interest was not really about inbreeding or outbreeding, but about transferring earthly divine power of tribal heads (to determine their own afterlife through reincarnation), to the monotheism of the Desert Religions as substitutes of God on Earth.

- So, Desert religions were mainly interested to take control over religion of the people. They changed polytheism (serial monotheism) from reincarnation into monotheism from resurrection.

- And here we see the similarity between the Myth of Abraham and the Myth of Paradise. Both are perverted by the Desert Religions. Seeing through this, we get a window into the actual religious evolution of bipedal primates. Not through retrospective religious research, but through prospective analysis.


Then this is our final conclusion about the origin of human religion:







Contemporary explanation of the Myth of Adam and Eve:

(52:20/5:59:14)

Dr. Jordan Peterson: The Exclusive Uncut Interview with Dr. Oz.

- Adam and Eve: Self Consciousness.
- Scales falls from their eyes.
- Realized their nakedness.
- Realized their vulnerability.
- They clothed themselves for not to be hurt.
- Everyone else is vulnerable too.
- You could hurt them.
That's why the knowledge of good and evil goes along with nakedness.
- Morality: Only human beings can manipulate others, unlike animals.



Continuing with current Islam:

Islam has been drowned out by its previous Inbreeding Culture and implemented inbreeding principles (as marrying a Muslim) in the outer mantle of religious endogamy:




And so the Muslim population remained an inbreeding culture, unwilling to assimilate with other cultures:




Assumption 578: The silent battle against the inbred population.
Reincarnation is at odds with resurrection in heaven. That's how the former inbreeding culture conflicts with Islam. 
But Islam compromised and allowed forced cousin marriages with honor killings, so that inbred-Muslims could reincarnate in their family genome, while still worshiping Allah in the parallel universe. These Muslims escaped the last judgment of God in heaven, but this price Islam was willing to pay tacitly. Because, the damage of many thousands of honor killings per year - caused by Islam - amounts to a formidable loss to the already impoverished genome of the inbred population, which cannot afford the lack of women with courageous characters and tender males. A genetic bloodletting that has been going on for 1,400 years. And so Islam degrades its inbred population:




Assumption 512
(---) So, Resurrection (Islam) secretly supports Reincarnation (cousin marriages), but the causal relationship is mutual, because the atrocities of honor killings (Reincarnation) underscore the terrible nature of Resurrection (Islam).(---)



The truth behind honor killings

This blog offers the truth behind honor killings. But will it be helpful? Will it change the Muslim culture? Only Muslim women can change their culture. And they will in this century. Muslim culture has to compromise or fall apart. Like Christianity, Islam will disintegrate. Read here the exciting projection into the future of Islam.






No comments:

Post a Comment