(347) True Myth of Abraham: settling dispute Homo erectus and Homo sapiens

 Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive

(347) True Myth of Abraham: settling dispute Homo erectus and Homo sapiens

Well, this compromise from Abraham with God is very similar to ancient Voodoo, except that believers worship their ancestors. Thus, the ban on worshiping ancestor gods must have been enacted by Desert Religions:

Then this must have been the original Myth of Abraham:

Assumption 579: The change of the Myth of Abraham.

The paradigm shift in human evolution has been the change of the afterlife from reincarnation to resurrection, which characterizes the true Myth of Abraham. And because reincarnation easily leads to polytheism and resurrection to monotheism, these concepts later turned into their corresponding number of gods. That created the false Myth of Abraham.

Only in the original myth it becomes clear why Abraham wanted to kill his only tribal son Isaac. Abraham wanted to prove his willingness to break the reincarnation cycle and subsequently to offer his transition to resurrection. So, Abraham was not a psychotic without empathy, serving only a cruel, merciless God. On the contrary, this must have been a wonderful epic drama of Greek proportions with the fundamental clarity about a wise God.  

The transition to the false myth with the contrast polytheism - monotheism becomes clear from Abraham's now seemingly absurd behavior. In this myth the concept of reincarnation was not mentioned any longer, or it would not be accepted by a desert population who still had reincarnation in their genes.

Desert Religions wanted a monotheistic takeover of power. Their concealment of reincarnation combined with the introduction of monotheism reversed the true myth of Abraham and caused a new paradigm shift in human religious revolution. Here they also took grateful use of the now merciless nature of their new and ruthless God. A dramatic change which would cause millions of honor killings.

Honor killings may have been unforeseeable, because they did not understand reincarnation as a genetic instinct that cannot be eradicated. And paradigm shifts in religion are not rare. But by killing the reincarnation populations of Iraq and Iran, Desert Religions have consciously taken moral responsibility.

Assumption 437: The cause of honor killings:

With Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), the idea of reincarnation arose, which caused big problems for inbreeding cultures:

1) Because of hostility among tribes, ancestors could only be reincarnated safely into their own tribe.

2) Next problem was that ancestors did not want to reincarnate into hybrids, because after their next death they would be strangers in their own tribe and refused for reincarnation. Then they had to roam through the universe for ever.

3) A third problem was the greater mortality from inbred populations which boosted fertility stress. So, the risk was tribal extinction if ancestors did not dare to return to the harsh tribal life to save the species.

And because tribal ancestors are nothing more than Muslim males, the last enforce cousin marriages because they unconsciously fear to lose their afterlife in hybrids.

That is why they kill their daughters on the suspicion of any sexual contact with 
non-tribal males. So, rape of a young girl, loss of virginity through a stranger, pregnancy from a non-Muslim, abortion in which an ancestor is killed who cannot return into the tribe as a hybrid, Western slutty lifestyle leading to possible adultery, or whatever suspicion which drives Muslim males mad can cause the death of a Muslim girl.

Diagnosis: A psychiatric disorder in which tribal separation anxiety causes a severe reincarnation psychosis leading to murder.

Assumption 519: The Feast of Sacrifice is the Feast of Reincarnation.
Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) invented the soul and reincarnation. Millions of years later, Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc) invented the parallel universe. Of course, a conflict of interest has arisen. For, during the period of Homo erectus, males had become egotheistic gods with absolute self-determination to reincarnate into their own tribe. They never wanted to live with the gods in the afterlife.
That's why the myth of Abraham created the compromise in which God was worshiped in the parallel universe and humans were allowed to reincarnate on earth. So far, so good. 
But Homo erectus had a much more diverse genome and was much more tolerant of inbreeding than Homo sapiens, who dropped to 3,000-10,000 breeding pairs with a very reduced genome, 100-50,000 years ago.
That is why Desert Religions changed the rules about 4,000 years ago and ex cathedra forced believers to resurrection in heaven to make inbreeding unnecessary for reincarnation. But at the same time males lost their divine egotheistic power. So, Muslim males lost divine power 1400 years ago to monotheistic terror which took all power to itself.
To establish their terror, Desert Religions changed the Myth of Abraham. It would be about polytheism (ancestors, idols) and monotheism (God). But the original myth takes on a more important role in reincarnation and resurrection. Because only then is Abraham's proposed murder on Isaac understandable.
So, what kind of situation has been created by Islam? Muslim males believe in Allah today, just as Abraham (a mythological figure) believed in God. But in nowadays Islam, people take it for granted that belief in Allah at the same times means the acceptance of resurrection in heaven. And that is the flaw in the Islamic faith. And here it goes wrong, because just like Abraham, Muslim males instinctively continued to believe in earthly reincarnation. And that is why they cherish the Feast of Sacrifice so exuberantly. 

Assumption 529: Why the Myth of Abraham must be false:

Well, we are used to psychotic prophets, but Abraham takes the cake. Do we really believe Abraham would kill his only tribal son to please God, apparently with no other reason than to demonstrate his submission? And that would be a masterpiece of human religion? While there are numerous stronger myths about worshiping God? 

No, originally this myth must have had a completely different meaning and it must be as old as Homo sapiens, about 350,000 years old.

The myth is not about the transition from polytheism (ancestors, idols) to monotheism (God). Monotheism has recently been developed in the evolution of human religion. This myth must have been crippled by the Desert Religions, which wanted to divert attention from what really matters. The puzzle fits only in case Abraham tried to kill his son to end reincarnation. Because then, where else should he reincarnate in his male kin bonded lineage with outbreeding? And indeed, now we have recovered an extremely powerful myth in line with the eloquence of the ancient Greeks. Now, the Myth of Abraham makes sense. And now we also understand that Desert Religions disguised 'reincarnation' as 'polytheism' and 'resurrection' as 'monotheism'. Because if the attention of believers would be focused on reincarnation, they never would have accepted the false Myth of Abraham. But monotheism, AKA the supremacy of the terror of the Desert, as a representative of God, yes, that's what believers swallowed. Hostile Bedouin tribes desperately needed an overarching God to fight alien intruders. So, Desert Religions tried to kill two birds with one stone: the extinction of inbreeding and the establishment of their own monotheistic terror 'in the name of God'.