Saturday 11 January 2020

(302) The model of the Muslim immigration

Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive





The model of the Muslim immigration


Necessary conditions for the Muslim invasion:

1: Masochistic Christianity.
2: Marxist cultural relativism.
3. Women's suffrage.

Necessary and sufficient condition:

1: Latent lesbian rulers at top positions of society are unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad and unconsciously drag Islamic SM-dyad into the empty core of God.



The most influential factor in the above model is women's suffrage, which has an enormous steering effect on Western culture. It is women's emancipation that has accelerated the Muslim invasion ad absurdum:



Assumption 500The strongly promoted Muslim immigration of Western Europe is an unconscious reaction to the flattened unipolar sexual relationship between husband and wife, named as Vanilla-dyad. Contrary to this Western unisex model, Muslims still use SM-dyad, which is bipolar and based on a sexual instinct.

Women's emancipation is unknowingly dominated by sexuality. Parallel to the sexual dimension of breeding we connote SM-dyad to inbreeding and Vanilla-dyad to outbreeding:





SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad:

Assumption 67:

- SM-dyad is the basic relationship between man and woman in human nature. It is a relationship that will haunt mankind to the farthest stars.

- SM-dyad is based on absolute male power and results in unequal sexual relations. It easily develops into paraphilia. Vanilla-dyad is formed from relativism and consists of equivalence in sexual relations.

- SM-dyad can temporarily transform into Vanilla dyad, in which case ultimately equal rights for men and women are obtained.

- Because equivalence is against male nature, Vanilla-dyad remains subordinate to SM-dyad. It is and will remain a substitute for the male sexual instinct. Which means that SM-dyad in the background is always present, always searching for new ways to self-realization. SM-dyad is the primal relation between male and female.

- The temporary primacy of Vanilla dyad is enforced by the intellectual development of women.



Assumption 501Multiculturalism is against discrimination and made it Article 1 of the Constitution. But this law protects Islam in the first place as the greatest discriminatory religion in the world. Multiculturalism drew Orwellian doublespeak into the Constitution and made Western morality to a farce.



Assumption 502: As an example of Orwellian doublethink latent lesbian men haters at top positions of Western society choose consciously for Vanilla-dyad (Me Too movement), while unconsciously yearning to SM-dyad by dragging in the Muslim culture.



The reason of the Muslim immigration lies in the unconscious, simply because no rational ground can be found. Asian workers were much cheaper 50 years ago and are highly intelligent. But anyway, also in the unconscious we find a logical explanation for the Muslim invasion of Western Europe. But it takes some time to lay the puzzle. In this resume I will write shorthand to explain the plot, but more analyses will follow.


How Political Correctness confuses the conscious with the unconscious

The most distinctive difference between Democrats and Republicans is that a lot of 'liberals' show the characteristics of psychosis in which they lack reality. Actually, they are a collection of individuals, each with their own moral standards that can change daily. This is the final stage of a Western outcrossing culture in which group identity already has been canceled. They call themselves atheists, but in religious terms this is purely polytheism:




Here we are dealing with a breakdown of Homo sapiens into Homo sapiens (PC) and (PI, Incorrectness):





Unconscious ethical standards

If a person makes conflicting statements represented by two crossing lines in the conscious, he may know to have reached an illogical conclusion. For example, it cannot be both true that one approves honor killings and at the same time fights for women emancipation. That will be unmasked in the rational conscious:


And one can also not claim to reject honor killings, while at the same time saying all cultures are equal. But yet that's a popular position of Political Correctness. 

The intersection of the lines of this claim lies in the unconscious for supporters of multiculturalism. They can't see the intersection and apparently don't perceive their error in thinking. So, one can be stupid enough not to grasp illogical statements, but one can also be highly intelligent and be blocked by the unconscious. 

This means Democrats in the House and journalists from CNN sometimes really mean what they say. But they don't have a grip on their unconscious attitude, their elusive moral standards.Therefore and in this case, we distinguish between Homo sapiens (PC) and (PI):



So, the problem with Political Correctness is they cannot choose for the Me Too movement supporting Vanilla-dyad and at the same time say all cultures are equal, while actually promoting SM-dyad from Islam with honor killings as a resultBut somehow they seem to be able to combine this in their unconscious, especially in the unconscious of latent lesbian women in top positions of society:


Political Correctness apparently is not able to distinguish in the conscious between
the Me Too movement (Vanilla-dyad) and Islam (SM-dyad). Then, how confusing will it be in their unconscious? Because Political Correctness supports Vanilla-dyad in the conscious, but a the same time adheres SM-dyad in the unconscious:

Assumption 499: Political Correctness supports Vanilla-dyad in the conscious, but at the same time adheres SM-dyad in the unconscious.


Well, that's not so strange, because SM-dyad is an instinct in the unconscious, an inherited sexual mindset from Australopithecus to fantasize and facilitate sexual play. Its main use was to fight fertility stress from bipedal primates, which as great apes had only few offspring:


While Vanilla-dyad is just a cultural product of civility and love in the conscious. It comes from outcrossing cultures without fertility stress and without autosomal recessive disorders, boosting the number of children.  This we find especially in inbred populations:



In outbred populations, boys are educated by their mothers to empathically respect women:


Otherwise they may become cultural psychopaths:
Without proper education by mothers, males respect only male sexuality and suppress 'other sexual roles' in the unconscious. Cultural schizophrenic males develop no sensitivity for females, no empathy and no sexual civility for women. Only natural psychopaths and cultural psychopaths take SM-dyad literally and may kill females in reality:

TAHRIR SQUARE

SM-dyad is a bipedal sexual instinct in the unconscious, with a projection in the conscious:

                           

But Vanilla-dyad is a cultural product of civility and love, which has no origin in the unconscious. Though some animals have also kind of Vanilla-dyad (bonobos). Chimps are not much interested in sex.

But two thousand years of Christian masochistic indoctrination resonates in the unconscious from where masochism originates:


SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad are completely different but can go together as complementary sexual behavior in the conscious.

Note: Vanilla-dyad is no masochism:




So, latent lesbian women at top positions of society can consciously choose for Vanilla-dyad but unconsciously yearn to SM-dyad. That's the real cause of the Muslim invasion of Western Europe: Orwellian double-think:

Assumption 502: As an example of Orwellian doublethink latent lesbian men haters on top positions of Western society choose consciously for Vanilla-dyad (Me Too movement), while unconsciously yearning to SM-dyad by dragging in the Muslim culture.


Assumption 497Vanilla-dyad is a cultural product of civility and love, while SM-dyad is a sexual instinct based on rudeness and lust. SM-dyad is a sexual mindset exclusively for bipedal primates to fantasize sexuality in order to facilitate sexual play. SM-dyad combined with Vanilla-dyad is complementary sexual behavior for bipedal primates.


What does this all mean? It says that people can advocate civility through Vanilla-dyad, but be obsessed by SM-dyad at the same time. Latent lesbian man haters supporting Vanilla-dyad in the open, can also be fascinated by brutal males with SM-dyad, which is a drive projected on Muslim males in the context of inter cultural orgasm:


Furthermore, we also know multicultural judges who punish extremely violent Muslims less than natives. Apparently, they also are unconsciously obsessed with SM-dyad. There are endless more examples from daily life showing Orwellian doublethink from Political Correctness in Western culture.

Multiculturalism is against discrimination and made this Article 1 of the Constitution.
But this law protects Islam in the first place as the greatest discriminating religion in the world. Multiculturalism drew Orwellian doublespeak into the Constitution and made Western morality to a farce.

Assumption 501: Multiculturalism is against discrimination and made it Article 1 of the Constitution. But this law protects Islam in the first place as the greatest discriminatory religion in the world. Multiculturalism drew Orwellian doublespeak into the Constitution and made Western morality to a farce.

This all makes the Muslim invasion into Western Europe a compensatory sexual lust:

Assumption 500The strongly promoted Muslim immigration of Western Europe is an unconscious reaction to the flattened unipolar sexual relationship between husband and wife, named as Vanilla-dyad. Contrary to this Western unisex model, Muslims still use SM-dyad, which is bipolar and based on a sexual instinct.



No comments:

Post a Comment