Saturday 4 May 2019

(274) The Formula of Sexual Religion

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 



We see inbreeding and outbreeding as lying on the basic dimension of sexual religion (SR), going from a very poor genetic genome (inbreeding) towards a genome rich of genetic variation (outbreeding). It is measured on interval level with negative values:


We also see human religion (HR) as a profitable function of sexual religion: HR = f (SR).






Assumption 448: Inbreeding and FGM as sexual religions.

Human religions are profitable functions of sexual religions. Males modify female sexual behavior in such a way that they benefit from it:

We give two examples: inbreeding and outbreeding.

1: In inbreeding cultures, fathers pay close attention to their daughters. Later on, Muslim fathers modify their daughters' sexual behavior into cousin marriages, so that they can reincarnate into their descendants without being afraid of reincarnation into hybrids from males from other tribes. 
It goes without saying that Muslim fathers will not mutilate the womb of their daughters, through which descendants will be born in whose offspring they hope to reincarnate. On the contrary, Muslim girls are fully controlled and shielded in their youth. Muslims must keep their daughters in optimal physical shape to function as incubator of family semen. So, Muslims keep the fish fresh in the fish tank, the closed mantle of endogamy.

2. Negro cultures are outbred populations where fathers do not necessarily reincarnate into descendants of their daughters and that's why they don't invest time to control them like Muslim fathers. Negro fathers in FGM areas project their afterlife in all kinds of women they encounter. They are lazy, selfish and completely irresponsible and immoral. For them their own daughters are null and void. They do not look after their daughters thoroughly for 15 years. They prefer to mutilate their baby daughters and cut out that terrible sexual lust they selfishly reserve for themselves.


Now we see cousin marriages as instrument for inbreeding cultures and FGM for outbred populations. Both are sexual religions.


There are many more sexual religions. For example 'pedophilia', from which perpetual orgasm (72 virgins in heaven) is derived profitably.


Basic dimension on ratio scale

Actually, our basic dimension is on ratio scale, because zero genetic variation between persons is possible: 'Because identical twins develop from a single fertilized egg, they have the same genome. So any differences between twins are due to their environments, not genetics. Recent studies have shown that many environmentally induced differences are reflected in the epigenome.'

Ratio scale has a real zero point as weight, length and time:


Ratio: The data which you can order and the difference between any of two values are the same (so they are interval), and there is the absolute zero. This means that a meaningful negative value of interval data does not exist (in statistics). The examples are weight, height, length, time, speed, and error rate.

Ratio scale has most of the characteristics of the other three variable measurement scale i.e nominal, ordinal and interval. Nominal variables are used to “name,” or label a series of values. Ordinal scales provide a sufficiently good amount of information about the order of choices, such as one would be able to understand from using a customer satisfaction survey. Interval scales give us the order of values and also about the ability to quantify the difference between each one. Ratio scale helps to understand the ultimate-order, interval, values, and the true zero characteristic is an essential factor in calculating ratios. 


We will compress Sexual Religion into a ratio scale:

We will construct a fictitious scale from zero genetic variability (absolute zero point) like between identical twins to maximum genetic diversity (total outbreeding) from solitary birds, flying around the world and choosing partners from the total population. Fictitiously, we standardize this upper limit to 1:

We will compress Sexual Religion into a ratio scale

On ratio scale, we do not need formulate a maximum for genetic variation. But we easily find a theoretical upper limit for genetic diversity in solitary birds, flying around the world and choosing partners from the total population. Fictitiously, we standardize this upper limit to 1.

Now we have a fictitious scale from zero genetic variability between identical twins to maximum genetic diversity according to the primal law of animal religion:


Next, we create a measure for genetic adaptability and genetic lack of adaptability:



Next, we must make a projection of the chance of extinction for inbreeding cultures in the far future. We take Pakistani Muslims in the UK as a try out for our hypothetical model. We came to this:



The decrease in the genome of Homo sapiens in the past 100,000 years:



We know between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago in the whole world were only 3,000 - 10,000 breeding pairs left.


- Devastating super volcano of Mount Toba (74,000 YA):

The super volcano of Mount Toba (74,000 YA) is thought to have decimated the human race. Anyway, the human genome shrunk enormously between 100,000 and 50,000 years ago. In the whole world there were only 3,000 - 10,000 human breeding pairs left.

We also know in the evolution of bipedal primates there have been about 26,000 breeding pairs on average about 1,2 million years ago:

'Homo sapiensHomo ergaster, and Homo erectus had, worldwide, a breedingpopulation of about 18,000 people—no more than 26,000 people. This means that all over the world, every human-like species that could possibly contribute genes to a current human added up to a smaller population than that of gorillas today.'

- Genetic bottleneck in humans

Additional caveats include difficulties in estimating the global and regional climatic impacts of the eruption and lack of conclusive evidence for the eruption preceding the bottleneck. Furthermore, genetic analysis of Alu sequences across the entire human genome has shown that the effective human population size was less than 26,000 at 1.2 million years ago; possible explanations for the low population size of human ancestors may include repeated population bottlenecks or periodic replacement events from competing Homo subspecies.

Then the bipedal primate population shrunk from 25,000/2=12,500 breeding pairs to 13,000/2 = 6,500 breeding pairs. So, between 100,000 and 50,000 years ago, the reservoir of genetic variation halved for Homo sapiens (350 Kya; 1400cc).

Here we see inbreeding from contemporary Neanderthals and Denisovans: 


Who escaped the Toba super volcano:


Maybe these subspecies can be compared with the bipedal primate population before Homo sapiens, with twice the amount of genetic diversity. 

We also have the San-people:

The San-people

Compare this to the San-people (Bushmen) in South Africa, who kept their genetic variation and probably escaped the Toba disaster of 74,000 years ago:

About 140,000 years ago human populations from East or Central Africa moved southwards and colonized western southern Africa. The probable nearest living relatives of these source populations are: the Hadzabe people from north-central Tanzania and  Mbuti pygmies from the eastern Congo. This migration gave rise to the present-day San hunter-gatherers (Bushmen)The San-people (and the Khoisan-group) are seen as the oldest Homo sapiens with the greatest genetic variation. They are said to show the human population genetic footprints:




'On the other hand, human population groups worldwide outside Africa are highly homogeneous genetically. This means, inbreeding with autosomal recessive disorders occurs sooner between Asians and Caucasians than within two neighbouring tribes of San people. They simply have more genetic variation in one tribe than we in the whole world.'

So, we think San people can be seen as the Homo sapiens with a original Homo sapiens genome from before Toba.


Hypothetical stages of genetic variation

We took solitary breeding pairs of birds as upper limit from genetic diversity = 1.
Chimp ancestors are 95% genetically diverse compared with this upper limit. For bipedal primates applies: inbreeding within tribes leads to a decreased genome per tribe as a function of time. Total genetic diversity from the species will be maintained only if tribal genetic losses are complementary compensated and disappear by interbreeding. So, if inbred tribes lost the same genes, the population can not retrieve its earlier varied genome. Bipedal primates were in the tragic situation that inbreeding was a by circumstances enforced sexual culture, by which their genome decreased over time.


Next, we make a projection of the chance of extinction for Pakistani Muslims in the UK as a try out for our hypothetical model. We come to this:







cc-by-nc-sa







This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment