Wednesday, 19 October 2022

(428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi

 Basic Dimension





(428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi

THIS ARTICLE IS A MESS

This chapter on Homo naledi is a struggle to extrapolate the supposed religious legacy of one of the first humans, an Australopithecus at that, onto today's Desert Religions. I need this disorderly mess to trace back my thinking process later. I also do not want to run the risk of being misunderstood. But it can be a bit unpleasant to read. My apologies for that.😌

But by reading assumptions 663, 662 and 661 you get all relevant information:


Assumption 663: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection.

- Homo erectus (2,1 Mya; 900cc) discovered the soul, needed for reincarnation in the offspring of its inbreeding culture, although there were also outbred populations. 
- But reincarnation was far from perfect, because ancestors never got their original genome back after reincarnation in later descendants, which hopefully were no hybrids as the Apple from Eve and the Serpent from another tribe. Because then, after their next death, ancestors would not be accepted in their own tribe anymore, because now they had become hybrids themselves (reincarnation psychosis). That's why Muslim males commit honor killings.
- Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1440cc) discovered resurrection in the parallel universe.
- Desert Religions wanted to end massive inbreeding by telling believers that earthly reincarnation does not return the original genome to ancestors, who clearly lost their body in this process.
- They proclaimed ex cathedra that upon resurrection in heaven their bodies would be completely reconstructed by God in their original genome. This was called physical resurrection in heaven. Now this is not the Christian point of view but the Muslim belief, which are also not allowed to believe in the soul, because not necessary in heaven.
- But reincarnation is a sexual instinct while resurrection is just a powerless word. That's why the Muslim faith became a hybrid religion of earthly reincarnation (Inbreeding (cousin marriages)) and heavenly resurrection (Islam, outbreeding).
- The point is that Homo naledi made the wisest choice, he also believed in physical resurrection, not in heaven but on earth. Furthermore, he needed no soul and in doing so had found a parsimonious variant of human religion. Homo naledi was a brilliant 'animal' with his 'orange' brain. He invented the most elegant and perfect form of human religion, although he was only an Australopith.





Assumption 662: Islam goes back on Homo naledi.

Homo Naledi exceeded Islam with regard to physical resurrection, because rebirth did not need a soul for the hereafter. Both cultures, Homo naledi and Islam, thought to stop earthly inbreeding by physical resurrection in the afterlife.
But the afterlife of Homo naledi was very realistic and in this universe, in its own tribe, just like reincarnation. Rebirth and reincarnation are based on sexual instincts, because they depend on breeding. They are not primary instincts but later on attached secondary sexual instincts, after people believed in it for millions of years.
But resurrection takes place in a different universe and has purposely no connection with breeding, because Desert Religions wanted to break the reproductive cycle (inbreeding) in an unknown parallel universe (heaven). Therefore, resurrection is not a sexual instinct and powerless against reincarnation or rebirth, it is just a word.




Assumption 661: The Muslim faith goes back on Homo naledi.

Homo naledi reached the astonishing conclusion that inbreeding at family level to bring ancestors back to life - completely with their original genome - was not necessary at all, if there was a God who could make exact replicas from their DNA. 

And this growing understanding ultimately ended the inbreeding cult of Homo naledi at family level, but not for the group as a whole, which had to remain a closed inbred population. Homo naledi was therefore extremely afraid of mixing with Homo erectus. 





And note: Islam later did exactly the same to eradicate inbreeding and incest: Allah reconstructs the deceased exactly and integrally before Muslims appear before him for judgment for heaven or hell. But just like Homo naledi, Muslims must remain a group and marry Muslims.

But Islam tragically failed to eradicate its culture of inbreeding, turning the Muslim faith into a hybrid religion of earthly inbreeding and heavenly resurrection:



How to connect Desert Religions to Homo naledi:

- Homo naledi did not believe in the soul and left the tombs of the dead open by which the fetus, reconstructed by the God of Darkness could escape to the upper world.

- Homo erectus believed in the soul and reincarnation and closed his tombs with heavy stones, because he thought the soul could travel through the walls anyways.

- Therefore, precious gifts are only to be found in closed tombs and Homo naledi never left something of value in the Rising Star Cave.

- All Desert Religions believe in the soul to let the deceased hear the final judgment of God.

- But only Islam believes in physical resurrection on an individual scale. And if we forget about the soul and heaven, then Islam is a replica of Homo naledi.

- Both wanted to end the autosomal recessive disorders from inbreeding by making earthly reincarnation unnecessary. Homo naledi believed in earthly rebirth and Muslims believe in heavenly resurrection. And because they thought of physical replacement with identical DNA, this seemed much better than reincarnation in offspring, always with some loss of the original genome.

- There are a number of reasons for Islam to place resurrection in heaven. In the first place, believers could be held accountable to Allah, for heaven or hell. As a result, Islam became the substitute, the surrogate from God on Earth.

- And perfect replicas of the dead could never be controlled in heaven, but certainly on earth. And Muslim believers saw no difference with normal earthly inbreeding. So, scholars had to escape to some parallel universe.

But for Homo naledi it was quite different. They could no longer distinguish one from the other, for after millions of years in isolation and inbreeding, Homo naledi had degenerated into a well-balanced breed of dogs that had already lived through all the autosomal recessive disorders. 

And it was precisely this uniformity that led them to the idea that the God of Darkness randomly distributed the fetuses over the population and that inbreeding at the family level therefore no longer made any sense. On the other hand, the group as a whole had to remain an inbred population and they were also very afraid of rape and abduction by Homo erectus. And from that mixture later came Homo sapiens.




                                      ------------------------------------------------



THE DERAILMENT OF THE HUMAN MIND:





REBIRTH, REINCARNATION AND RESURRECTION:




Assumption 658: Rebirth, Reincarnation and Resurrection:

Rebirth from Homo naledi (3-2 Mya) and Resurrection from Islam are nearly identical religions. The only difference is the soul in Islam, which Homo naledi did not have. But the soul is not really needed in Islam. It is a magical gadget from Homo erectus (2.1 Mya; 900cc) from which Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1440cc)) derived the impermissible trick to make resurrection in heaven possible. Resurrection in heaven is a feedback loop of Allah's threat with heaven or hell towards earthly believers. Because without a soul believers could not hear the judgment of God and feel the pain of hell.

Both Rebirth (God of Darkness) and Resurrection (Allah) have a monotheistic God, who provides the deceased individual with new telomeres and further improves DNA. Communication with the gods is not needed. A soul is not needed. Both religions resurrect the deceased physically in which a soul is not needed. 

The only function of the soul in Islam is to hear the judgment of God for heaven and hell. But that is an improper aspect of religion in the sense of being unnecessary. The soul is therefore based on an unnecessary substantiation of Desert Religions to be able to pressure believers on behalf of God. Something Homo naledi had rejected.

Homo naledi can be seen as the ultimate cause of Islam. Of course, this statement  projects a line from the religious evolution to the present. But it may also have been another ancestor which extended inbreeding from the first bipedal primates to Islam. What matters is to develop an initial model that can be amended.

And so we're going to see if we can link Homo naledi to Islam throughout inbreeding and incest.

Obviously, the soul is not needed for Homo naledi's Rebirth, because they had the God of Darkness. But the soul was indeed necessary for Reincarnation, which concerns the choice of a specific birth process into another body (from the own tribe usually). But the soul is not necessary for Resurrection any longer. There is no birth process involved and the same person is brought back to life in some parallel universe, again by a god. 

So the soul is only needed in reincarnation, where the previous body has disappeared and the soul only has to fulfill the bridging function to the new body.

Assumption 659: Rebirth requires open graves (Rising Star Cave), allowing the fetus (from the dead body) to rejoin the life cycle, aided by the God of Darkness. In reincarnation, the soul rises from closed tombs through stone and concrete.

In the evolution we have become accustomed to regard the soul as inherent to human dignity. But the question is whether the soul is necessary for resurrection and whether resurrection is not just another form of rebirth. So, resurrection is exactly rebirth from Homo naledi, with the ridiculous soul added.

We conclude the soul as hereditary baggage that has no real meaning in resurrection. Then, it is also not necessary to give Jesus a soul to rise after death. We can also assume him asleep or hibernation rather than dead.

And if a person is really dead then a soul is not necessary because Allah in heaven reconstructs the human body in detail again.

And that is exactly the God of Darkness from Homo naledi. So, resurrection from Islam is identical to rebirth from Homo naledi.

All this means that the soul is a sick form of magical thinking to escape the reality of life. Nothing to be proud of. It's a sick way of thinking from cauliflower-brained humanoids.

'The soul' of human species with an inflated prefrontal cortex is a relic of evolution in the wrong direction. Magical thinking interferes with logic where a soul is not needed if a god is also postulated. So God does not communicate with the soul but with our body. Then personal identity does not lie in the soul but in the body.


HOMO NALEDI IN THE RISING STAR CAVE MARKS THE TURNING POINT IN HUMAN RELIGION


Thursday, 10 December 2015


Conclusion:

So, we may conclude the discovery of the Rising Star Cave is serendipity, a matter of good luck in science (as the discovery of penicillin). The Rising Star Cave must be seen as an extremely rare field experiment that satisfies scientific requirements for research into rebirth. And guess what, it is quite possibly the only cave in the world suitable for rebirth research.

All other facilities might need reincarnation. Homo naledi will change our opinion about animal religion completely. And from human reincarnation back to animal rebirth is going back through the sound barrier of animal religion. Homo naledi will give humankind a fantastic insight in the development of animal religion:





HOW TO DISTINGUISH REBIRTH FROM REINCARNATION:

NB: Rebirth requires open graves (Rising Star Cave), allowing the fetus (from the dead body) to rejoin the life cycle, aided by the God of Darkness:




On the other hand, reincarnation has closed tombs, for example with stones, through which only the soul can pass. Burying a body uncovered can therefore indicate reincarnation as well as rebirth.





THIS ARTICLE IS A MESS

The next chapters on Homo naledi are a struggle to extrapolate the supposed religious legacy of one of the first humans, an Australopithecus at that, onto today's Desert Religions. I need this disorderly mess to trace back my thinking process later. I also do not want to run the risk of being misunderstood. But it can be a bit unpleasant to read.

For the first time in history, humanity is being corrected by the natural religious sense of the first hominins, Australopithecus, who were by no means as stupid as we think. They understood the circle of life much better than Homo erectus, who with his cauliflower brain fled psychotically into the soul and reincarnation. Homo naledi, on the other hand, did not believe in the soul, but in resurrection of his original body. Both were wrong but Homo naledi was psychologically healthier than Homo sapiens.




There is some freedom to choose for different directions in the logical development of Homo Naledi's rebirth religion, but also in their later mixing with Homo erectus (possibly reincarnation). In short, anything is possible:




But the principal choice will be whether Homo Naledi continued to develop as inbreeding culture up to our Desert Religions, or whether they confessed already long ago to polytheism (outbreeding). Or was there a mixed development in both directions, before and after merging with Homo erectus. Or did the eternal alternation from inbreeding to outbreeding and back play a role here, irrespective of the species:






INTRODUCTION INTO HOMO NALEDI RELIGION




Fourteen million years ago, the first bipedal primates (14 Mya; 300cc) emerged from the trees. And until 7 million years ago they could still interbreed with chimpanzees. Their brain size was 300cc and that was enough to survive the dangerous nights of the African wilderness without advanced weapons for 14 million years. Think about that when you call these pre-humans "animals." 




Homo naledi had a small but naturalistic brain averse to the magical thinking of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) with his cauliflower brain. 




They could withstand predators almost without weapons because otherwise they already would have become extinct. At the time of Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), there were only 26,000 bipedal primates in the world.

And they really didn't climb the sparse low trees of the savanna when attacked by feline's, which were up much earlier. Rather, they gathered together with wooden spears and attacked the predators fiercely. And they were still as strong as chimpanzees, but now with logical brains. And last but not least they knew how to make ropes and how to tie them together, for example to drag spears.




Because we have a completely arrogant concept of brain size, we are misled by bipedal primates with fewer brain content but more advanced - down to earth - religious ideas than us. 





Homo naledi started with inbreeding

Australopithecus (3.4 Mya; 400cc) turned its inbreeding culture into religion: 




And so later Homo naledi (2.4 Mya; 236 Kya) was also linked to hereditary inbreeding:

The starting model of Homo naledi: Inbreeding.

The God of Darkness placed newborns back by adding some family-DNA after conception:




Homo naledi evolved into outbreeding within their inbred population

But in our follow-up model newborns were not placed back in their former family any longer, nor was family-DNA added. Newborns were simply dropped anywhere in the tribe. Of course this is a more elegant model, but in doing so, Homo naledi lost the link with inbreeding, the link between parents and offspring, which turned the inbred population into practical outbreeding within their closed inbred group (compare bonobos):




Assumption 661: The Muslim faith goes back on Homo naledi.

Homo naledi reached the astonishing conclusion that inbreeding at family level to bring ancestors back to life - completely with their original genome - was not necessary at all, if there was a God who could make exact replicas from their DNA. 

And this growing understanding ultimately ended the inbreeding cult of Homo naledi at family level, but not for the group as a whole, which had to remain a closed inbred population. Homo naledi was therefore extremely afraid of mixing with Homo erectus. 

And note: Islam later did exactly the same to eradicate inbreeding and incest: Allah reconstructs the deceased exactly and integrally before Muslims appear before him for judgment for heaven or hell. But just like Homo naledi, Muslims must remain a group and marry Muslims.

But Islam tragically failed to eradicate its culture of inbreeding, turning the Muslim faith into a hybrid religion of earthly inbreeding and heavenly resurrection:




Because they all looked alike:

Over time, Homo naledi individuals became nearly identical to each other due to extensive inbreeding over millions of years, like a balanced dog race and parents could not tell the difference between each other's progeny any longer. This gave room to suspect that newborns possibly were not born within their original families. They could have been randomly placed in the group by the God of Darkness.

But then inbreeding made no sense any longer and they actually practiced outcrossing (adultery and sexual freedom), albeit within their inbred population, somewhat like bonobos in Sodom and Gomorrah.

As a consequence, Homo naledi ultimately believed in complete physical resurrection of the body of the individual independent from the DNA of their foster parents, which is our second step in the conceptual development of Rebirth:

An improved religion model for Homo naledi:

Assumption 656: (655 rewritten). In the second sense of Rebirth, Homo naledi transcended the spiritual value of Reincarnation (Homo erectus). Because in the latter the soul was placed into a foreign body, by which the deceased lost his physical identity (his own body). While the ultimate conception of Rebirth was a complete rebirth of the original body, possibly within any woman of the tribe. And because naledi did not believe in the soul they were fully reborn with their original physical and psychological identity.

So their new parents weren't necessarily their biological parents, because the newborn's DNA didn't have to match their parental DNA, because it only had to come from the tribe as a whole, where everyone looked perfectly alike. Newborn DNA could come from deceased anywhere in the tribe. 

As a consequence inbreeding on family level as a sexual religion did not make sense any longer and they behaved adulterously, like bonobos, although the tribe as a whole remained pure inbred as a calibrated dog race. This led to outbreeding within a closed balanced inbred population.

As said, Homo naledi didn't believe in the soul, which was not necessary, because the God of Darkness did all the work. Therefore, Rebirth of Homo naledi resulted in a complete physical and psychological rebirth of the deceased. That's why Rebirth transcended Reincarnation. 

Until 2022, I understood Rebirth (first step) as divine creation of a fetus later supplemented with DNA characteristics from the parents (inbreeding). Either the God of Darkness simply replaced the bodies of ancestors within their original families. But it was not inbreeding any longer if God replaced them anywhere in the tribe, which is the second phase of their religion.

But as said, there must have been a second developmental step where Homo naledi realized that parental DNA might not have been used for newborns. Homo naledi individuals were nearly identical to each other due to extensive inbreeding and they could not tell the difference between each other's progeny any longer. This gave room to suspect that newborns were not born within their original families. They could have been randomly placed in the population by the God of Darkness.

Then, in this second phase of Rebirth, the bond with parents was completely released and the fetus could be born anywhere in the Homo naledi population. Homo naledi could not verify this because all individuals looked alike, like a balanced dog race.

It is only a minor difference in theory but with far-reaching consequences:

In the first step, Rebirth was only partly physical resurrection, because in later development of the fetus DNA from both parents was added. And this is somewhat like reincarnation in which the soul is placed into another body with completely different DNA.

The second step involved full physical resurrection because there was no mixing with parental DNA later in development:




And in this second sense, Rebirth transcended the spiritual value of Reincarnation, where the soul was placed in a foreign body, by which the deceased lost physical identity (his own body). 

So, according to Homo naledi, Rebirth gave a complete physical and psychological resurrection in its second phase, where Reincarnation did not go further than a spiritual resurrection (the soul) in a foreign body. Where a soul was not even necessary for Homo naledi, because the God of Darkness did all the work.

So, this minimally different, second interpretation that definitely must have revealed itself to Homo naledi, completely outclassed Reincarnation from Homo erectus and also made forced inbreeding obsolete. This is because the parental bond with the offspring was broken. And this must have paved the way to outbreeding and to disintegration of the Homo naledi population, as outbreeding dissolves into polytheism, which eventually loses group identity.

Well, this also depends on the closeness of the group as a whole. At parental level there was no inbreeding any more, but still at group level. But in evolution that might dilute into outbreeding. Physical resurrection was maintained.

Finally and in the third step (polytheism) Homo naledi also moved on to the soul and reincarnation because the belief in the God of Darkness lost its power, but that is another story: 




Thereafter Homo naledi merged with Homo erectus:



                                            
But we also keep in mind the possibility that inbreeding as a religion within Homo erectus has made its way into Homo sapiens. That scenario also needs to be worked out. And so we look for a way from Homo naledi to the best hypothetical candidate of the Desert Religions, as follows:


The betrayal of Desert Religions

Desert religions completely wrongly adorn themselves with the title 'Abrahamic religions', where they are simply the ones who have violated the truth:




The original myth was not about polytheism and monotheism. And that's why we proceed with the difference between reincarnation and resurrection:







Reincarnation:

Reincarnation leaves divine power to choose the afterlife in the hands of tribal heads and is tied to breeding. 




For contemporary Muslims: inbreeding is (unconsciously) intended to reincarnate into one's own family genome through reincarnation. But because Muslims do not worship female gods we call this form of reincarnation not polytheism, but serial monotheism.

In reincarnation multiple house gods may be worshiped, which stand for multiple sexual roles, e.g. also female gods. This form of reincarnation indicates psychological polytheism according to this blog, e.g. Voodoo:




But there is also monotheism leading to male reincarnation (Islam), which over generations is called serial monotheism:




Resurrection:

Originally, monotheism pointed for Desert Religions to a single (heterosexual) God, besides an ancient Jewish goddess, But as those religions evolved in evolution, various other sexual roles were worshiped in the conscious. Resurrection can thus indicate either monotheism (a single God: Allah) or psychological polytheism (worshiping more sexual roles in the conscious).

So, Desert Religions enforced resurrection in heaven and originally started as 
monotheism (a single heterosexual God), but in evolution changed to polytheism (Judaism and Christianity), while Islam stayed monotheistic with Allah.







And although Islam officially still worships monotheism, many Muslim males long for multiple virgins from other tribes in heaven, which is technically - but not empathically honored in the conscious - procreating outside the own Muslim tribe (outbreeding, polytheism). And so also Muslims expect to lose inbreeding in heaven and then practice technically polytheism without empathy in 'other sexual roles'. 

This means that polytheism refers to multiple gods by worshiping multiple sexual roles in the conscious, or to the unempathetic worship of blonde Christian whores from other tribes in heaven, but this rejection of inbreeding comes factually down to outbreeding in heaven, where sexuality regresses to outbreeding as primal sexual law in nature, what comes down to technically polytheism.

Assumption 657: Outbreeding replaces inbreeding as primal sexual natural law.
If earthly inbreeding is eradicated, then outbreeding remains as primal sexual law in nature, also in heaven of the parallel universe. If there is breeding in heaven, then outbreeding, as with 72 blonde Christian virgins from another tribe.
Assumption 151: The power of inbreeding cultures lies in the enhanced contrast between earthly and heavenly sexuality. The Muslim faith contrasts inbreeding on Earth with outbreeding in heaven. Outbred populations do not need this heavenly satisfaction, because they already enjoy heaven on Earth.
Assumption 152: Islam is an endogamous inbreeding culture, offering a factually exogamous afterlife in heaven. A genetic monoculture on earth (Islam) flirts with genetic diversity in heaven (Christianity), where the latter must be seen as heaven on Earth. Jealousy led to the persecution of Christians, because their masochistic suffering is compatible with exogamic lust. And violent bloodlust and hatred discharged on Jews, because though their culture relied also on inbreeding and incest, their females were left free choice to exogamy as in the group of higher mammals.

Assumption 154: There exists a magical but reasonable connection between the parallel universe and inbreeding and incest. Earthly reincarnation offered endless orgasm in the afterlife of the tribe. But the prospect of the same unattractive cousins and sisters appeared no promise but a curse.
Therefore Homo sapiens invented the parallel universe. It was the flight to an unknown paradise where one could have perpetual orgasm with 72 beautiful fresh woman slaves on an entirely new dimension.  






Desert Religions real goal was to seize power by forbidding reincarnation (inbreeding) and to twist the Myth of Abraham from reincarnation to resurrection (outbreeding):




And that's why the Muslim faith has become a twisted, hybrid religion of reincarnation (cousin marriages, inbreeding) and resurrection (Allah in heaven, outbreeding):




And so resurrection ultimately developed to outbreeding, to polytheism in heaven,
because of the acknowledgment of all possible sexual roles in the conscious: Christianity (Mary, Jesus, other sexual roles) and Judaism (sexual freedom for women and a sexual goddes in ancient times).

But even Muslims have the phantasy of 72 blonde Christian virgins from other tribes in heaven (outbreeding).

So, we changed the interpretation of religion by identifying gods as sexual roles. If only male heterosexuality is recognized we conclude to a single god (monotheism). More sexual roles empathically acknowledged in the conscious means more gods accepted (polytheism).

Assumption 657: Outbreeding replaces inbreeding as primal sexual natural law.
If earthly inbreeding is eradicated, then outbreeding remains as primal sexual law in nature, also in heaven of the parallel universe. If there is breeding in heaven, then outbreeding, as with 72 blonde Christian virgins from another tribe.
 




It is difficult to grasp outbreeding, outcrossing, genetic diversity in heaven as a remedy against earthly inbreeding, which is intended to preserve family DNA in the afterlife, but physical resurrection (the body) hypothetically prevents the need for earthly inbreeding.

So, if Muslim males expect to resurrect physically and fully identical in the afterlife, there is no need anymore for earthly inbreeding to acquire just an inferior afterlife with the preservation of only some family DNA by reincarnation in later offspring from earthly inbreeding, hopefully not into hybrids (honor killings).

After all, resurrection then produces a perfect copy of the Muslim, while with reincarnation the soul ends up in a physically different body, though sometimes offspring of family DNA (inbreeding cultures, serial monotheism). That is a truth of magical thinking.

Why is this discussion so important? Because psychological science increasingly realizes that the mind is formed to a large extent by the body. If one loses the body, the soul would turn out to be just a marginal phenomenon.

Well, may we conclude that Homo naledi and Muslims foresaw this effect? Everything is possible by thinking out of the box. And that is certainly conceivable in cultures that ritually treat their dead.

The brilliant find of Islam is that the human body - just like Homo naledi - will be fully restored in heaven before the face of God. While in Christianity only the spirit is resurrected, what does leave much identity. So as a formidable difference, Christians lose their bodies in heaven, but Muslims don't.

All Desert Religions do believe in the soul, which results from illegal magical thinking. But notice how closely Islam is to the religion of Homo naledi. Pure physical resurrection (the body) from the original genome is the best medicine against earthly inbreeding intended for the afterlife. And now we see the difference with outbred populations as Christianity, with nearly no inbreeding, but therefore a very poor psychological identity in heaven.

So, the North European Peoples didn't need physical resurrection, because they were practicing outbreeding. And the Jews have a split afterlife belief.

Reincarnation and resurrection Desert Religions:

Obligation to marry a Muslim and cousin marriages are pure derivatives of their (former) inbreeding religion, now called Islam without inbreeding:






The double agenda of Desert Religions

Desert religions tried to curb the immense inbreeding within their populations, which is a noble pursuit, but their real aim was to take off the divine power from the people to determine their own afterlife and instead - after their death - to let them be accountable to God for heaven or hell. And so desert religions blackmail people and seize power as substitutes of God on earth.





Main developments within Desert Religions

Within Desert Religions some fundamental developments took place from monotheism (inbreeding, Islam)  to polytheism (outbreeding, Judaism and Christianity): 






Assumption 653: Superior (Centripetal) and Inferior (Centrifugal) religions:

Superior religions are monotheistic and based on male heterosexuality as first God. Superior religions are predicated on inbreeding (Alpha male), which is at odds with the outbreeding instinct of females:





That is also why the husband-wife model from superior religions is based on the stronger version of SM-dyad, to force women into cousin marriages:


 

Superior religions are furthermore 'centripetal' in keeping groups together and giving believers a sense of group identity. This at the expense of freedom of speech and sexual diversity. Individuality is lost and males do not develop empathy with sexual roles other than male heterosexuality.

Especially female sexual roles are suppressed in the unconscious and women are seen as objects, like tables and chairs.

On the other hand heterosexual males are seen as subjects and are empathically experienced in the conscious:



Inferior religions are polytheistic and based on all possible sexual roles with maximum rank in the god space:




So, polytheism is the full rank model of empathically experienced sexual space nested in the god space. In other words, polytheism is the full rank god space from females, from which the male god space shrank to the main factor: the only empathically experienced male heterosexuality factor or SM-dyad for males.





 

Gods are sexual roles:

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality

 


 


The problem with polytheism is their open-ended group admission policy (open borders like post-modernism from the democrats, US), which ultimately results in the complete loss of group identity in individualism. Also the complete loss of group morality and ethical stability. And without group identity, religion cannot exist.

As a result, Christianity falls apart like a fading rose and turns into completely individual and morally unfettered political correctness (post-modernism).

Ultimately, dying Christianity will be swallowed up by Islam, which still retains its SM-character and retains group identity. Meanwhile, Christianity is drowning in Vanilla-dyad.



Judaism is the exception to the rule. It is polytheistic because of sexual freedom of women but has also remained an ethnic group because of female mt-DNA.

And Christianity was a polytheistic counter-reaction of a group around Jesus to monotheism and this religion found acceptance among Northern European polytheistic peoples.




Judaism developed as polytheism because female roles are acknowledged in the conscious. In fact Judaism became a patriarchal culture based on a matriarchal bloodline. 

This means Jews kept their group integrity without inbreeding because women are free in their sexual choice.
 
This means that Judaism possesses the same qualities as superior religions although it is polytheistic. And that makes Judaism a special case, which cannot be overrun by, for example, Islam, which fate will befall Christianity:




Thus Islam remained unchanged monotheistic with the recognition of only male heterosexuality in the conscious and the repression of  'other sexual roles' into the unconscious. 

Judaism, on the other hand, as a patriarchal society is based on the female bloodline and thus recognizes female sexuality in the conscious, which comes down to polytheism. Women do have their own choice for a marriage partner.

So, only Islam is left as theoretical inbreeding successor to Homo naledi in this line of reasoning.


Superior and inferior religions

Homo naledi and Islam have superior religions caused by inbreeding. These religions are mostly monotheistic in nature (God of Darkness, Allah):




Super religions (superior religions) are monotheistic inbreeding religions inherited from the first bipedal primates. They are innate for human males. But over time, a polytheistic variant, called inferior religions, develops based on the earlier and primal sexual instinct of all animals: polytheism, genetic diversity, outbreeding or outcrossing.




Monotheism and polytheism alternate in the evolution. But the bipedal inbreeding instinct is strongest for humanoids and takes the lead every time. For humans, inbreeding is also accompanied by SM-dyad-strong (woman as object), which is a sexual instinct, while polytheism is based on SM-dyad (weak, woman as subject) as in the animal kingdom. 




In addition, human polytheism also has the soft Vanilla-dyad (Me-too movement) which is not an instinct but just a sign of civilization:




So humans possess two innate instincts. The first comes from the animal world and is called polytheism (Vanilla-dyad). That's still the primal instinct of females. The second is a bipedal sadomasochistic degeneration: SM-dyad.

But there is something strange about human males, they suffer from an interfering later instinct called monotheism, which is normally based on inbreeding from Alpha males:










Superior religions are monotheistic inbreeding religions inherited from the first bipedal primates. They are innate for human males.




Both instincts alternate in the evolution. One can think of periods of 5,000 years. But for stable inbreeding cultures like Homo naledi, this can sometimes drag on indefinitely in their evolution. Homo naledi had a balanced inbred culture with no autosomal recessive disorders left and so they all looked alike.

Below, we put Homo naledi just before Islam:






Of course it is a joke to measure 'the soul' along scientific standards. It is not meant to be rude, but only to show the difficulty rational animals must have had with the concept of soul. To grasp the idea of the soul one must have developed a cauliflower brain in the first place. Then, with an exuberant overcapacity of psychotic ganglia Hominins developed enough fantasy to escape reality.

- The soul is kind of a Deus ex Machina to maintain the illusion of eternal life. Magical fake degrees of freedom are supplied to rational thinking and mixed into 'religion'.
That's the mess Homo sapiens created and yet he seems proud of his cauliflower brain.

- Homo naledi was not dumb at all and must have been much smarter than a chimp. Also the design of his 550cc brain apparently followed already the basic outline of the human brain. It is really possible he could talk considering his endocast and he definitely used tools -335 Ka. So the perfection of the human brain is possibly not caused by its size but by the design of its basic structure, which Homo naledi possibly possessed long before Homo sapiens emerged. If that's true this will cause a revolution in paleontology.

- In principle, the expanding brain of Homo sapiens is disadvantageous for logical thinking. A growing number of neural pathways delivers irrational and magical ganglia which are fostering psychosis and make logical thinking more difficult than in smaller brains with the same basic structure. Therefore humans have to be drilled in logical thinking not to fall into the vortex of insane religions as monotheism. Maybe small brained people had less problems with rational thinking. Homo sapiens will undoubtedly die out from his absurd psychotic brain.






Assumption 649: Why humanoids invented the soul.

- The soul is the identifying connection between a person and his afterlife.
- In addition to transferring individual identity, the soul can also be used to determine the desired body for reincarnation.
- The soul thus determines nature (transfer of personal entity) and direction (choice of body) in the transition to the hereafter.
- But the soul was not necessary in Genetic Immortality (Australopithecus), because there the individual died where his genes lived on.
- The soul was also not needed in Rebirth (Homo naledi) because there the God of Darkness created new implanted fetuses with extended telomeres from the DNA of the deceased, which revived in person.
- In Rebirth, Homo naledi only had to make sure that the deceased were buried near the right women in order to send the fetuses to the correct wombs after sexual intercourse. When women didn't get pregnant, then no fetuses passed by.
- The soul was invented for reincarnation by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), to connect the deceased with their new body in the afterlife. The soul transferred their personal identity to these new bodies and chose the tribe of reincarnation, usually their own tribe.
- Then, reincarnation needs a soul or a God, but not necessary both, because a God can do the work of the soul (Homo naledi's God of Darkness).
- And so developed in the evolution reincarnation with and without a God.
- Reincarnation with a god is when humans reincarnate on Earth, while God lives in some parallel universe from where he rules the Earth. An example is the real Myth of Abraham (300 Ka), based on reincarnation, allowed by God in the parallel universe, remnants of this religion are still visible in ancient Voodoo.
- So, with the arrival of Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc) there arose a combination of reincarnation from Homo erectus and God from Homo sapiens in some parallel universe. The Myth of Abraham confirms this combination of reincarnation and God, which was not necessary for Homo erectus, because reincarnation was not yet contested by resurrection.
- But later on, Desert Religions misled believers as explained on this blog extensively. Importantly, they misused the supposed communication with God to drag believers before his altar to judge them for heaven or hell. And today 'Abrahamic' religions,
desiring power, still fulfill this hypocritical function of God's surrogates on Earth.
- The soul came into being through the unbridled fantasy of Homo erectus, whose magical thinking was based on nothing. It only served to enable reincarnation and to ensure the transfer of personal identity into the afterlife. 
- But in Islam the soul is not necessary any longer, because Allah does the work of the soul just as the God of Darkness. So, Allah arranges this transfer to the afterlife. 
Therefore, the Muslim soul has no compelling meaning whatsoever for reaching the afterlife. (Well, the soul is necessary for Allah's judgment for heaven or hell.)
- It must be concluded that the belief in the afterlife has hitherto been a magical error, and one cannot continue to add new delusions like the soul in order to make the impossible seem possible after all.
- As said, this unless the deceased needs to communicate with God. But the latter was only introduced with Resurrection. It can be seen as an unnecessary gadget, because the soul was introduced already to Reincarnation.
- Desert Religions believed in Resurrection, which meaning diverged for Jews, Christians and Muslims.


How to connect Desert Religions to Homo naledi:

- Homo naledi did not believe in the soul and left his tombs of the dead open by which the fetus, reconstructed by the God of Darkness could escape to the upper world.

- Homo erectus believed in the soul and reincarnation and closed his tombs with heavy stones, because he thought the soul could travel through the walls.

- Therefore, precious gifts are only to be found in closed tombs and Homo naledi never left something of value in the Rising Star Cave.

- All Desert Religions believe in the soul to let the deceased hear the final judgment of God.

- But only Islam believes in physical resurrection on an individual scale. And if we forget the soul and heaven, then Islam is a replica of Homo naledi.

- Both wanted to end autosomal recessive disorders from inbreeding by making earthly reincarnation unnecessary. Homo naledi believed in earthly rebirth and Muslims believe in heavenly resurrection. And because they thought of physical replacement with identical DNA, this seemed much better than reincarnation in offspring with some loss of their original genome.

                                      ------------------------------------------------


Outbreeding, outcrossing or genetic diversity is nature's primary sexual law. But the first bipedal primates, which spread in all directions, did not meet many other groups to exchange young females:




And so humanoids invented the first inbreeding culture that was later elevated to the first and primal bipedal religion (monotheism), placing primal animal religion (outbreeding (polytheism)) second.

In bipedal evolution an everlasting alternation between inbreeding and outbreeding started, which still forms the basis of human religion:
 



 Which still forms the basis of human religion:
 


* Hinduism is also bound to breeding: So, at least 32.8 + 13.8 + 22.5 = 69.1 = 70% religion based on breeding.


Outbreeding and Inbreeding, also known as God's first and second creation:



The duration of these religions generally seem to be 5000 years at the most, so there will have been numerous revolutions. 




And therefore Islam can only have evolved metaphorically from Homo naledi: 




Numerous inbreeding cultures were intermediate:





* Reincarnation and Rebirth are dependent on Breeding and are sexual instincts.

The male God of male heterosexuality (monotheism) invented Inbreeding:











Jews had a split view of the afterlife:

- Jewish interpretation:
Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth with soul, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26]
However, 1st century Judaism had no conception of a single individual rising from the dead in the middle of history. The historical Jewish concept of resurrection was that of a redemption of the whole people.[28] Their concept was always that everybody [sleeping forever, BD] would be raised together at the end of time [Rebirth with soul, BD]. So the idea of one individual rising in the middle of history was foreign to them.[29]

This means that within the early Jewish faith there was no question of ending the inbreeding culture as rendered obsolete by placing the deceased himself back into his family (as a child) with identical DNA. That would have been a perfect solution for their inbreeding cult * where by the way, through reincarnation, only part of the DNA of the deceased was expected to return in the offspring.

* Resurrection in heaven (outbreeding) came after earthly reincarnation (inbreeding).

We conclude that the Jewish faith had nothing to do with fighting their enormous inbreeding cult:



In the first stage of Jewish culture there was a lot of inbreeding in their patriarchal culture. But along the way they developed the well known matriarchal reproductive lineage in which women choose their males. According to this blog this is outbreeding, crossbreeding or genetic diversity. 





And this matriarchal lineage within a patriarchal culture is remarkable, where on the contrary, Muslims chose for patriarchal lineage within their patriarchal culture. 





So in time, Jews relaxed forced inbreeding to sexual freedom for women, who hate inbreeding. Jews ultimately presupposed asexuality* in heaven, which basically amounts to genetic diversity as primordial law of the animal world:

* It's not that Jews explicitly chose for asexuality in heaven, but sexual freedom for women, a matriarchal lineage and the rejection of inbreeding, indicates in heaven asexuality, which comes down to outbreeding as primal sexual law in nature:









We cannot imagine anything substantial in the Christian afterlife:

Christians have absolutely no idea of the afterlife. But anyways, they don't believe in physical resurrection in heaven. That leaves us with spiritual resurrection in heaven.




- Christian interpretation:
In several episodes in the Four Gospels Jesus foretells his coming death and resurrection, which he states is the plan of God the Father.[24] Christians view the resurrection of Jesus as part of the plan of salvation and redemption by atonement for man's sin.[25] 


Resurrection of Jesus

The resurrection story appears in more than five locations in the Bible. In several episodes in the Four Gospels Jesus foretells his coming death and resurrection, which he states is the plan of God the Father.[24] Christians view the resurrection of Jesus as part of the plan of salvation and redemption by atonement for man's sin.[25] Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth with soul, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2, from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law. The Pharisees, whose views became Rabbinic Judaism, eventually won (or at least survived) this debate. The promise of a future resurrection appears in the Torah as well as in certain Jewish works, such as the Life of Adam and Eve, c 100 BC, and the Pharisaic book 2 Maccabees, c124 BC.[27]
However, 1st century Judaism had no conception of a single individual rising from the dead in the middle of history. The historical Jewish concept of resurrection was that of a redemption of the whole people.[28] Their concept was always that everybody [sleeping forever, BD] would be raised together at the end of time [Rebirth with soul, BD]. So the idea of one individual rising in the middle of history was foreign to them.[29]

                                                  ------------------------------------

Resurrection of Jesus

The resurrection story appears in more than five locations in the Bible. In several episodes in the Four Gospels Jesus foretells his coming death and resurrection, which he states is the plan of God the Father.[24] Christians view the resurrection of Jesus as part of the plan of salvation and redemption by atonement for man's sin.[25] Belief in a bodily resurrection [Rebirth with soul, BD] of the dead became well established within some segments of Jewish society in the centuries leading up to the time of Christ, as recorded by Daniel 12:2, from the mid-2nd century BC: "Many of those sleeping in the dust shall awaken, some to everlasting life, and some to everlasting peril". Josephus (1st century AD) gives the following outline: The Pharisees believed in Resurrection of the Dead, and the Sadducees did not.[26] The Sadducees, politically powerful religious leaders, rejected the afterlife, angels, and demons as well as the Pharisees' oral law. The Pharisees, whose views became Rabbinic Judaism, eventually won (or at least survived) this debate. The promise of a future resurrection appears in the Torah as well as in certain Jewish works, such as the Life of Adam and Eve, c 100 BC, and the Pharisaic book 2 Maccabees, c124 BC.[27]
However, 1st century Judaism had no conception of a single individual rising from the dead in the middle of history. The historical Jewish concept of resurrection was that of a redemption of the whole people.[28] Their concept was always that everybody [sleeping forever, BD] would be raised together at the end of time [Rebirth with soul, BD]. So the idea of one individual rising in the middle of history was foreign to them.[29]

                                                  ------------------------------------

Islam:

Muslims from the inbreeding culture had their own reasons in dealing with life after death. They chose for physical resurrection with repaired DNA by Allah, resulting in a perfect reproduction of the individual, while the combination of: inbreeding and reincarnation in the offspring would yield at most a shadow of their original genome. But all Desert Religions are based on the soul, the biggest fallacy of Homo erectus (2.1 Mya, 900cc). The soul is needed to communicate with Allah and to hear his judgment about heaven or hell. Without a soul they wouldn't be in pain in hell. That's why Muslims have a soul.


- Islamic interpretation:

The majority of ahl as-sunnah scholars and Islamic theologians think that resurrection is going to be physical in the hereafter and human beings are going to be resurrected with their souls and bodies, called to account and be rewarded or punished. 

Assumption 662: Homo Naledi exceeded Islam with regard to physical resurrection, because he did not need a soul for the hereafter. Both cultures thought to stop earthly inbreeding by physical resurrection in the afterlife.



Resurrection and sins committed with that organ.

The majority of ahl as-sunnah scholars and Islamic theologians think that resurrection is going to be physical in the hereafter and human beings are going to be resurrected with their souls and bodies, called to account and be rewarded or punished. The Quranic verses seem to support this view (see Ta Ha 20:55, al-Hajj 22:5, 7; al-Nur 24:20, Ya Sin 36:78-79, al-Qiyamah 75:34). The fact that resurrection is going to be physical (with body) plays a role – partly though – on people’s hesitation about organ transplantation. However, when the issue is examined deeply, it is seen that organ transplantation is not directly related to resurrection; or more properly that organ transplantation has got nothing to harm the belief of resurrection because the transplanted organ is going to be returned to its real owner. Actually, it does not prevent organs to be resurrected with their real owners even though they decayed under soil, burnt to ashes, or eaten by animals. As a matter of fact, the Quran states that one’s organs are going to be gathered together with the slightest details in the hereafter (al-Qiyamah 75:34). Islamic scholars, judging from this proof and the likes, have concluded that everyone is going to be resurrected with their own organs.

BD: Resurrection of the own body - with or without soul - must be seen as rebirth. 
There are a number of reasons to prefer rebirth above reincarnation, since some highly placed persons like Jesus could not be offered a second hand body. Also in Judaism the whole people has to be resurrected in their original identity. All these preconditions make reincarnation less favorable than 'rebirth' in a number of instances.

                                                        -----------------------------



Resurrection and sins committed with that organ.


The majority of ahl as-sunnah scholars and Islamic theologians think that resurrection is going to be physical in the hereafter and human beings are going to be resurrected with their souls and bodies, called to account and be rewarded or punished. The Quranic verses seem to support this view (see Ta Ha 20:55, al-Hajj 22:5, 7; al-Nur 24:20, Ya Sin 36:78-79, al-Qiyamah 75:34). The fact that resurrection is going to be physical (with body) plays a role – partly though – on people’s hesitation about organ transplantation. However, when the issue is examined deeply, it is seen that organ transplantation is not directly related to resurrection; or more properly that organ transplantation has got nothing to harm the belief of resurrection because the transplanted organ is going to be returned to its real owner. Actually, it does not prevent organs to be resurrected with their real owners even though they decayed under soil, burnt to ashes, or eaten by animals. As a matter of fact, the Quran states that one’s organs are going to be gathered together with the slightest details in the hereafter (al-Qiyamah 75:34). Islamic scholars, judging from this proof and the likes, have concluded that everyone is going to be resurrected with their own organs.

BD: Resurrection of the own body - with or without soul - must be seen as rebirth. 
There are a number of reasons to prefer rebirth above reincarnation, since some highly placed persons like Jesus could not be offered a second hand body. Also in Judaism the whole people has to be resurrected in their original identity. All these preconditions make reincarnation less favorable than 'rebirth' in a number of instances.

                                                        -----------------------------

The tragedy of the Muslim faith:

Muslims think they can't donate organs because their physical identity will fall apart, which is simply true. Then Allah could resent them as undermining his attempt to restore their physical integrity. Because after their death their body will be rebuilt by Allah and they are obviously not allowed to give away parts by which self-identity gets lost.

Of course, organ transplantation is a recent thing and Islamic scholars who wrote the texts didn't think about that. The fact that it suddenly no longer seems morally objectionable is because not wanting to donate organs also raises ethical questions.

What is really going on here is that scholars from Desert Religions used the physical and psychological (soul) resurrection as reason not to have to apply earthly inbreeding anymore, which only led to reincarnation in offspring with more or less defective genomes that would only partially match that of the deceased.

But we know reincarnation is a function of breeding but resurrection is not. On the contrary, resurrection was conceived precisely to eliminate breeding. Which means that reincarnation was linked to sexuality and therefore is a sexual instinct, while resurrection is not. And only sexual instincts form the real basis of religion. And so the Muslim faith became religious mixture, a tragical hybrid of an inbred population and a resurrection population.



Homo naledi also believed in individual rebirth by the God of Darkness, which was physical but without soul. The soul was not needed because there was no communication with God. And Homo naledi was an ancient inbreeding culture.

- Rebirth (Homo naledi) and Resurrection (Desert Religions) are quite similar. The difference is that Homo sapiens took over from Homo erectus 'the soul'. Homo sapiens misused this gadget to terrorize believers who had to communicate to God. And because Desert Religions saw themselves as vicars of God on Earth (Christianity and Islam), they took over religious power from tribal heads (ego-theism) and banned reincarnation.

- If we limit ourselves only to Islam, then the similarity with Homo naledi is greatest. Both are based on physical rebirth, with or without soul. Both are inbred populations but a formidable difference is that Islam needs a parallel universe as afterlife, while Homo naledi was reborn on earth.

This unless the deceased needs to communicate with God. But the latter was only introduced with Resurrection. It can be seen as an unnecessary gadget, because the soul was introduced already to Reincarnation.

And it is also obvious to suspect that the combination of Homo naledi with Homo erectus led to Homo sapiens, quite reasonably.







Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)