Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
GOOGLE TRANSLATES INTO YOUR
OWN LANGUAGE, E.G. ARABIC:
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴
First lesson: Never react directly to your father if he asks how you think about marrying your cousin. Don't argue with him! Say you will think it over. As long as he has hope he will not harm you. He does not like honor killings either. From now on you must plan your escape from home, because he might not change his mind.
But it is possible that he does not insist any further, depending on the strength of his inbreeding instinct*, that might have been diluted by some outcrossing in the evolution. If he suspects that you don't want to marry your cousin, about what you have given no cues and if no conflict happens, then you are not in danger.
Unfortunately, a family history of cousin marriages is a clear indication of the inbreeding instinct. But also fathers who pick out the marriage partner for their children may still have remnants of this instinct. The role of mothers is determined by cultural indoctrination and male pressure.
After serious conflicts have arisen, your father apparently might give up his wish for a cousin marriage, but he cannot extinguish his inbreeding instinct, which he does not know to have. This means, from now on you will enter a bad relationship with your father, staying or leaving home. That leaves you with the existential choice to break with your family now or live with them in a much stronger fear for the rest of your life.
But beware of the following. Sadia Sheikh left home after a series of conflicts and lived elsewhere for several years, but still was killed by her brother and sister after her family invited her at home for reconciliation.
Also realize Mudusar Sheikh, her brother who performed the honor killing, inherited the inbreeding instinct from his father and as an adult was fully responsible for his deeds. The father therefore did not deserve the heaviest punishment. That's the flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial.
Gülsüm Selim was helped by German authorities with a different identity and was assigned a home. She too went back home for reconciliation but was strangled with an iron cable by her brother and father and beaten dead with an iron bar. The brother is fully responsible too.
What you see is this horrible act cannot be explained as punishment for violation of 'the honor of the family'. Because here 'offense' and punishment are fully disproportionate. A super strong unconscious instinct must be responsible for slicing daughters to pieces, what is unheard of and unprecedented in human evolution. This is best explained by a kind of inner justice, described in Sexual Scales of Religion, a sexually based sadistic revenge mechanism as reaction to the frustration of earthly reincarnation of Muslim males, see this blog:
Second lesson: Never trust anybody from your family, they all are going to kill you. Never speak with them about how you think about arranged or even worse: forced marriages. Especially, don't trust your mother, because she is indoctrinated. But if you have a close friend, one of your peers in school, who you trust completely and is no family, then it is okay to talk about your problems.
Third lesson: Avoid an intimate relationship with your father. He has to back off your reproductive organs. In some cases your cousin can be his projected substitute.
Fourth lesson: Never tell your father that Allah knows his inappropriate feelings about reincarnation. You're not in the position to tell him and will only cause huge conflicts.
Fifth lesson: So, you have control of your own destiny. If you do not make any conflicts with your father, you will come to know the strength of his inbreeding instinct. And without conflict he will also not grasp his unconscious lust for reincarnation in the earthly universe. It is just you who activates his unconscious. BTW, it's already too late to warn him, because he's already in a moderate psychotic state, which only can aggravate.
Sixth lesson: Never, never talk with anybody about your abortion, just run.
Gülsüm Selim and Mirjam Abarkan had abortions too, known to the family. The unconscious message is that an ancestor reincarnated into the hybrid (no Muslim) and was killed also with the fetus, with no chance to reincarnate again into the family, this all definitely meaning the death penalty for Gülsüm and Mirjam.
Seventh lesson: So, never, never trust anybody from your family. Don't talk about your planned break away. Go to a help organization in your country. In Muslim countries never go to the police, for they will bring you back home again.
Eight lesson: After leaving home, never make peace again with your family. Never come home again and disappear forever! They will kill you! Both, Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim were trapped and came home to make peace again. Subsequently, they were murdered, Gülsüm was butchered by her father and her brother.
This is the full honor killing model:
Preface
I'm afraid I haven't discovered anything new. Millions and millions of Muslims must have sensed it before. They all felt the real cause of honor killings. But I developed a rational model for these half-conscious suspicions. So, see it this way, I provide a rational model in the conscious for what others already must have felt subconsciously for ages.
What I'm going to tell must have been well known by Muslim scholars, 1400 years ago. From then on this knowledge has faded away into the unconscious of Muslim believers. Maybe now it's the right time for this blog, maybe not. We'll see.
Muslim scholars must have known that the horror of the Muslim faith was the deliberate compression of two opposite beliefs into one faith: reincarnation and resurrection. They knew the ancient inbreeding instinct leading to reincarnation was unbeatable. And their enforced resurrection in heaven was a powerless surrogate, but anyway dictated ex cathedra. This made honor killings the footprint, the benchmark of this gruesome amalgamation.
Islamic scholars willfully must have created this schizophrenic mess, leading to fear, hatred and retribution, rendering them the power over a frightened people. Even after centuries in which honor killings became a growing disaster they did not relax their resurrection doctrine, but still enforced it ex cathedra. Because this horror suited their power over a frightened people. That makes Islam completely guilty of honor killings.
But soon the controlling power over women is over in Islam. They are becoming more educated than men, have cell phones and social media at their disposal and are becoming totally uncontrollable, while networking outside their old fossilized society. Then, this combined religion, the Muslim faith, will fall apart into 4 sub-religions, see this blog. So, If Islam wants to save some of its hegemony about the Muslim group, probably only in name, they better relax the resurrection principle in the first place and be as wise as following the Myth of Abraham, see this blog.
So, the reason that Islam is enforced on the people is there was another religion earlier, reincarnation, which was much stronger than resurrection, which was unbeatable and had to be controlled with all strength:
It was a brilliant idea to harass and take hostage the reincarnation belief of a people in their unconscious, BTW. As long as Muslims don't realize their prisonership into their own unconscious, trapped into a Gordian knot from opposing religions, which plagues them with fear, distrust and sadism, they will never awake and shall evolve further down the road into total desperation. In fact Muslims are mentally devastated by Islam.
To clarify this model, I offer the most parsimonious and heuristic religious model in the world, combining honor killings with human religion. It is not kinda religion but a rational theory, falsifiable in the universe. And it is easily understood.
A model in which Human Religion (HR) is based on Sexual Religion (SR) and in which HR is a function of SR: HR = f(SR), which hypothesis will not easily be falsified, because f is based on magical thinking. This theory aims to give new foundations to all Human Religions (SR) in past and future.
This theory is based on about 500 contiguous and non-conflicting assumptions, in which Human Religion (HR) is derived from Animal Sexuality (SR) starting with mammals living in groups together from about 20 million years ago. This Basic Dimension (SR) has inbreeding and outbreeding as extremes.
.jpg)
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive
OWN LANGUAGE, E.G. ARABIC:
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴
First lesson: Never react directly to your father if he asks how you think about marrying your cousin. Don't argue with him! Say you will think it over. As long as he has hope he will not harm you. He does not like honor killings either. From now on you must plan your escape from home, because he might not change his mind.
But it is possible that he does not insist any further, depending on the strength of his inbreeding instinct*, that might have been diluted by some outcrossing in the evolution. If he suspects that you don't want to marry your cousin, about what you have given no cues and if no conflict happens, then you are not in danger.
*The inbreeding instinct is thought to be founded by Homo erectus (2.2 Million years ago; 900cc) and is meant for earthly reincarnation. On the other hand resurrection in heaven from Allah is only 1400 years old and imposed on the population.But if he perseveres and starts making conflicts, because it appears you are not willing to marry your cousin, then you know it goes wrong and it will only become worse. In that case you better find a help organization, which will give you further instructions. But don't talk to anybody from your family and never go to the police!
Unfortunately, a family history of cousin marriages is a clear indication of the inbreeding instinct. But also fathers who pick out the marriage partner for their children may still have remnants of this instinct. The role of mothers is determined by cultural indoctrination and male pressure.
After serious conflicts have arisen, your father apparently might give up his wish for a cousin marriage, but he cannot extinguish his inbreeding instinct, which he does not know to have. This means, from now on you will enter a bad relationship with your father, staying or leaving home. That leaves you with the existential choice to break with your family now or live with them in a much stronger fear for the rest of your life.
But beware of the following. Sadia Sheikh left home after a series of conflicts and lived elsewhere for several years, but still was killed by her brother and sister after her family invited her at home for reconciliation.
Also realize Mudusar Sheikh, her brother who performed the honor killing, inherited the inbreeding instinct from his father and as an adult was fully responsible for his deeds. The father therefore did not deserve the heaviest punishment. That's the flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial.
Gülsüm Selim was helped by German authorities with a different identity and was assigned a home. She too went back home for reconciliation but was strangled with an iron cable by her brother and father and beaten dead with an iron bar. The brother is fully responsible too.
What you see is this horrible act cannot be explained as punishment for violation of 'the honor of the family'. Because here 'offense' and punishment are fully disproportionate. A super strong unconscious instinct must be responsible for slicing daughters to pieces, what is unheard of and unprecedented in human evolution. This is best explained by a kind of inner justice, described in Sexual Scales of Religion, a sexually based sadistic revenge mechanism as reaction to the frustration of earthly reincarnation of Muslim males, see this blog:
Second lesson: Never trust anybody from your family, they all are going to kill you. Never speak with them about how you think about arranged or even worse: forced marriages. Especially, don't trust your mother, because she is indoctrinated. But if you have a close friend, one of your peers in school, who you trust completely and is no family, then it is okay to talk about your problems.
Third lesson: Avoid an intimate relationship with your father. He has to back off your reproductive organs. In some cases your cousin can be his projected substitute.
Fourth lesson: Never tell your father that Allah knows his inappropriate feelings about reincarnation. You're not in the position to tell him and will only cause huge conflicts.
Fifth lesson: So, you have control of your own destiny. If you do not make any conflicts with your father, you will come to know the strength of his inbreeding instinct. And without conflict he will also not grasp his unconscious lust for reincarnation in the earthly universe. It is just you who activates his unconscious. BTW, it's already too late to warn him, because he's already in a moderate psychotic state, which only can aggravate.
Sixth lesson: Never, never talk with anybody about your abortion, just run.
Gülsüm Selim and Mirjam Abarkan had abortions too, known to the family. The unconscious message is that an ancestor reincarnated into the hybrid (no Muslim) and was killed also with the fetus, with no chance to reincarnate again into the family, this all definitely meaning the death penalty for Gülsüm and Mirjam.
Seventh lesson: So, never, never trust anybody from your family. Don't talk about your planned break away. Go to a help organization in your country. In Muslim countries never go to the police, for they will bring you back home again.
Eight lesson: After leaving home, never make peace again with your family. Never come home again and disappear forever! They will kill you! Both, Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim were trapped and came home to make peace again. Subsequently, they were murdered, Gülsüm was butchered by her father and her brother.
This is the full honor killing model:
I'm afraid I haven't discovered anything new. Millions and millions of Muslims must have sensed it before. They all felt the real cause of honor killings. But I developed a rational model for these half-conscious suspicions. So, see it this way, I provide a rational model in the conscious for what others already must have felt subconsciously for ages.
What I'm going to tell must have been well known by Muslim scholars, 1400 years ago. From then on this knowledge has faded away into the unconscious of Muslim believers. Maybe now it's the right time for this blog, maybe not. We'll see.
Muslim scholars must have known that the horror of the Muslim faith was the deliberate compression of two opposite beliefs into one faith: reincarnation and resurrection. They knew the ancient inbreeding instinct leading to reincarnation was unbeatable. And their enforced resurrection in heaven was a powerless surrogate, but anyway dictated ex cathedra. This made honor killings the footprint, the benchmark of this gruesome amalgamation.
Islamic scholars willfully must have created this schizophrenic mess, leading to fear, hatred and retribution, rendering them the power over a frightened people. Even after centuries in which honor killings became a growing disaster they did not relax their resurrection doctrine, but still enforced it ex cathedra. Because this horror suited their power over a frightened people. That makes Islam completely guilty of honor killings.
But soon the controlling power over women is over in Islam. They are becoming more educated than men, have cell phones and social media at their disposal and are becoming totally uncontrollable, while networking outside their old fossilized society. Then, this combined religion, the Muslim faith, will fall apart into 4 sub-religions, see this blog. So, If Islam wants to save some of its hegemony about the Muslim group, probably only in name, they better relax the resurrection principle in the first place and be as wise as following the Myth of Abraham, see this blog.
So, the reason that Islam is enforced on the people is there was another religion earlier, reincarnation, which was much stronger than resurrection, which was unbeatable and had to be controlled with all strength:
Assumption 408: In religious evolution a monotheistic God has been created (Desert Religions) who has dethroned all gods from ancestors. An unknowable God, in an invisible parallel universe, who has forbidden polytheism. Whose sexual terror is superimposed on all other religions, but specifically collapsed the Muslim culture into craziness.Reincarnation meant divine power in the hands of ancestors. But instead, a religious coup enforced human resurrection into an invisible parallel universe, where of course, 'inbreeding for earthly reincarnation' made no sense anymore. There, believers were judged by an invisible God, from whom no images dared to exist alike the old ancestors, because only an unrecognizable and unidentifiable God could function as the great common divisor for all these hostile and fighting Bedouin tribes. A tyrannical unknown and unknowable God, who would judge their lives for heaven and hell, but who actually gave all power to a new ruling class, the Islamic class, consisting of Muslim males.
It was a brilliant idea to harass and take hostage the reincarnation belief of a people in their unconscious, BTW. As long as Muslims don't realize their prisonership into their own unconscious, trapped into a Gordian knot from opposing religions, which plagues them with fear, distrust and sadism, they will never awake and shall evolve further down the road into total desperation. In fact Muslims are mentally devastated by Islam.
To clarify this model, I offer the most parsimonious and heuristic religious model in the world, combining honor killings with human religion. It is not kinda religion but a rational theory, falsifiable in the universe. And it is easily understood.
A model in which Human Religion (HR) is based on Sexual Religion (SR) and in which HR is a function of SR: HR = f(SR), which hypothesis will not easily be falsified, because f is based on magical thinking. This theory aims to give new foundations to all Human Religions (SR) in past and future.
This theory is based on about 500 contiguous and non-conflicting assumptions, in which Human Religion (HR) is derived from Animal Sexuality (SR) starting with mammals living in groups together from about 20 million years ago. This Basic Dimension (SR) has inbreeding and outbreeding as extremes.
The real reason for honor killings is earthly reincarnation
The ancient, but still alive inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus states that ancestors from inbreeding cultures demand genetically identical descendants for reincarnation. In those days you didn't want to reincarnate into hostile tribes. So, ancestors were thought to refuse reincarnation into tribes without cousin marriages, while their return on Earth was really needed for tribal survival, because that lowered fertility stress (FS: low breeding numbers from bipedal primates). Of course, ancestors were nothing more than self-projections from males and were only used to create religious authority in women for inbreeding.
Remark: Early hominids and also Homo erectus had much more genetic variation and could resist inbreeding much better than Homo sapiens.
And guess what, this ancient instinct, this belief in reincarnation is much stronger than nowadays enforced belief in resurrection. But the problem is reincarnation has dived into the unconscious, whereas resurrection is conscious. This means, Muslims lost track on reincarnation.
Why has reincarnation become unconscious?
In history, Muslims are forced - on pain of death - to believe in resurrection in heaven from Allah in the parallel universe. So, believing in earthly reincarnation meant the death penalty in the last 1400 years. This means, Muslim fathers must have suppressed reincarnation as reason for cousin marriages in their unconscious and have fallen back, have regressed to the earlier ground for cousin marriages called 'honor of the family'.
The link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages is broken
So, the conclusion must be the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriage is broken in the conscious of Muslim fathers, but also in the minds of their daughters, who don't see any reason for being family semen incubator any longer. So, Muslims don't know any longer wherever honor killings are good for, but this inbreeding instinct is still vividly alive in their unconscious.
Honor killings play below the surface of the conscious. We better reject all conscious reasons related to 'honor of the family'. We must start from scratch and develop an honor killing model based on rational grounds.
Muslim fathers want to reincarnate into their own tribal genes from cousin marriages
All honor killings because of pregnancy, abortion*, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc, have the same ground: Muslim fathers unconsciously, panically fear to reincarnate into offspring with mixed, hybrid genes. Because then, after their next death they are not pure tribal members any longer and will not be allowed to reincarnate into their own tribe again. But remember, they don't realize the reason of their panic fear, they think it's because of 'honor of the family', whatever that may be:
* Abortion means an ancestor has already been killed and possibly had first become a hybrid. This definitely deserves the death penalty.
Some further remarks
A second remark is that total inbreeding is impossible and families make assessments that bears their approval. They can choose partners in whose descendants they don't object to reincarnate, usually persons from the same ethnicity. And they may also sell their daughters if they have little trouble with the inbreeding instinct.
A third remark is that a billion Muslims are not authentic Arab or Asian Muslims. Pakistani are original Muslims with the inbreeding instinct inherited (mtDNA L3M). But Boko Haram (mtDNA L2), captured 200 juvenile females lately from other tribes for breeding. That's outbreeding, since they originally came from outbreeding cultures. They do not have the inbreeding instinct inherited either.
The fourth remark is groundbreaking. Here we assume and have the premise that the postulated inbreeding instinct is inheritable, unless inbred populations merge with outbred peoples, on which the inbreeding instinct dilutes. Without this proposition honor killings cannot be explained rationally. But with this assumption the whole honor killing puzzle falls into place. So, you can choose. I have thought about this very well and many articles on this blog are about this inbreeding instinct:
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
So remember, if the inbreeding instinct is falsified the whole theory is loose. Then, if we forget about culture, there is no other general cause, no other explanation available why thousands of Muslim fathers kill their daughters every year. Why they commit the same crime without mutual communication. Well, Newton was also wrong but as long as it leads to the right predictions, don't bother. Anyway, the theory HR= f(SR) cannot be more parsimoniously.
A rational explanation of honor killings
Although this explanation of honor killings may seem weird at first sight, this is not the case. Islam repressing reincarnation is a rational ground for fear. Furthermore, honor killers are usually in a psychotic delusional mood, in which the unconscious steers their behavior beyond their conscious will. Therefore, they will disagree with this explanation and see themselves as quite normal. But themselves, they have no explanation for their behavior, except that ridiculous 'honor of the family', meaning they have none. They really don't know what they are doing, they are acting instinctively. They might see themselves as quite normal, what underlines their sickness.
A fight on life and death
So, what happens is simply a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter. If she refuses this cousin marriage, he will be lost forever as a ghost in the universe. That's a fight on life and death. And now we have the right parameters to give honor killings the right embedding, we must search for a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter.
So why is he killing her? Because if she is dead there is no risk to reincarnate into a hybrid anymore.
The heuristic value of the theory
A theory should be falsifiable and possibly parsimonious. Above theory will not easily be falsified, is very simple and gives an all inclusive explanation for honor killings committed because of pregnancy, abortion, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc. As long as we can predict honor killings on the basis of this theory it is useful and valuable. This means, it does not need to be true in the first place, although after eight years of painstaking introspection I found no other rational theory. Would there be one, I would definitely have found it.
The theory might be falsified for psychosis, because I think the suppressed belief in reincarnation leads to a psychotic state in honor killers. Then, it is possible to make the postulated inbreeding instinct conscious again, so that the psychotic state of Muslim males is removed. Then, we expect a decrease in honor killings by preventing psychosis. This would sustain the theory.
But a side effect can be that information about reincarnation just strengthens perpetrators in their belief and their willingness to kill, but then without psychosis. Then, they would deserve a suitable punishment in case of honor killings. A punishment without leniency.
RELIGIONS ARE FUNCTIONS OF EARLIER RELIGIONS, FOLLOWING THE EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF RELIGIOUS CONCEPTS:
EVEN QUADRUPEDS (CHIMPS) FOLLOW A RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENT WITH A STRIKING SIMILARITY BETWEEN HOMO AND HIS NEPHEW PAN:
IN NATURE, OUTCROSSING IS THE PRIMAL LAW OF PROPAGATION (QUADRUPEDAL PRIMATES). ONLY BIPEDAL PRIMATES INVENTED INBREEDING BY LACK OF OTHER TRIBES FOR THE EXCHANGE OF JUVENILE FEMALES:
RELIGIONS ARE FUNCTIONS OF EARLIER RELIGIONS. ISLAM IS A FUNCTION OF INBREEDING, BECAUSE IT WAS THE LATER RELIGION:
THEN, BECAUSE CHRISTIANITY IS THE INVERSE OF COUSIN MARRIAGES, THE INVERSE OF INBREEDING, CHRISTIANITY IS A FUNCTION OF OUTBREEDING, BECAUSE OUTCROSSING WAS THE EARLIER SEXUAL RELIGION:
ACCORDING TO THIS BLOG, THIS IS NOT COINCIDENTAL: OUTBREEDING IMPLIES 'EQUAL SEXUAL ROLES', IN WHICH ALL ROLES HAVE THEIR OWN GODS. THAT'S POLYTHEISM (OLD GREEKS) AND SEMI POLYTHEISM (CHRISTIANITY WITH GOD, JESUS AND FEMALE SAINTS). OUTBREEDING REFERS TO OPEN GROUPS.
BUT ISLAM IS A CLOSED GROUP OF PURE MONOTHEISM WITH A SINGLE GOD, WITH ALLAH AS A MALE GOD, MEANING THAT FEMALE SEXUALITY HAS NO RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY. IN ISLAM WOMEN HAVE TO BE OPPRESSED TO COOPERATE WITH INBREEDING, SINCE THEIR NATURAL INSTINCT IS OUTCROSSING. IN ISLAM, WOMEN ARE OPPRESSED INTO SM-DYAD, WHILE CHRISTIANITY HAS VANILLA-DYAD AS EQUAL RIGHTS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.
ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY ARE OPPOSITE RELIGIONS ON A SEXUAL SCALE, CALL IT 'INBREEDING' VS 'OUTBREEDING' ON THE BASIC DIMENSION. BUT THEIR DEEPEST TRUTH LIES IN SADOMASOCHISM, OF WHICH SM-DYAD REFLECTS THE NATURAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE FROM BIPEDAL PRIMATES, STILL TO FIND IN ISLAM IN RAW FORM.
Below the wording of the Muslim faith as a horrible combination of heavenly resurrection and earthly reincarnation, which 'water and fire' combination caused millions of deaths. Honor killings are not collateral damage from Islam. On the contrary, Islam is completely responsible for inflicting them:
Honor killings, how it's made:
Eight years I searched for the cause of honor killings, from which I offered one year to my country for the MH17. I tried all strategies, dived deep into my unconscious for the sense of atmosphere around honor killings. That's how unconscious alignment works. It has been a rollercoaster of emotions, a horrible psychotic experience which was triggered by my immense anger (PTSD) about the killing of Sadia Sheikh. It struck me so deeply that I was determined once and for all, to resolve honor killings and religion altogether. I built my own religious model out of the animal world.
I was shocked about how previously loving fathers could change into most brutal, horrible and gruesome animals. It was unbelievable. And after the kill they showed some cold and apathetic behavior. It is like psychosis, not able to differentiate between delusion and reality anymore. The satisfaction from the kill in the inner world of delusion, against the cold shower from the horror and anger of the outside world. To what extent were those fathers really aware of their situation? That's the core problem. And to solve this problem one must show empathy with these brutal murderers, but of course, no sympathy.
The crazy thing is I already owned the solution of this drama right from the beginning, but had no model. The model demands two degrees of freedom: Human religion (HR) and Sexual Religion (SR). But I was functional fixed and always thought Human Religion equals sublimated Animal Sexuality (SR), on the same degree of freedom. So, I came not at the idea of HR = f(SR), though sublimation delivered exactly (f), the second degree of freedom.
I wrote all possible scenarios and in the end I came out on the rational explanation of an impossible contrast between earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection:
I really think this is the best thinkable rational ground for honor killings. If there was another, let alone better solution, I would definitely have known. But there isn't.
So, now we have the formula, the model HR = f(SR), in which honor killings take place. But we still have to find the rationale of honor killings in this plot. So, what was the Muslim father thinking and how was his daughter reacting. The model only gives the precondition for the psychological diagnosis we have to make.
But we also know resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1), measured over time: HR2 = f(HR1). And again, we have two degrees of freedom to find the solution for honor killings. And this alternative function - theoretically based on a time series expansion - tells us Islam forbade earthly reincarnation, what is the crux to understanding honor killings. So, the conditions lie in the formula, which we have to interpret.
Resuming, for the explanation of honor killings we need Islam as Human Religion (HR), dependent on Inbreeding as Sexual Religion (SR), but we also need resurrection from (HR2) caused by reincarnation from (HR1). So, resurrection (outbreeding) and reincarnation (inbreeding) are based on the basic dimension in HR = f(SR), but are also connected in time, wherein reincarnation precedes resurrection in HR2 = f(HR1). Together this creates a strong causal effect in the explanation of honor killings:
- So, what we have to fill in is the relationship between inbreeding (SR) and reincarnation (HR): the inbreeding instinct.
- But also we must generate theory why resurrection (HR2) unsuccessfully tried to replace reincarnation (HR1), what created the devastating effect of honor killings.
Both effects are described extensively on this blog. The inbreeding instinct is a mega-effect from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), which caused not many honor killings, because fertility stress and reincarnation were well understood grounds for cousin marriage in those days. But Islam, thinking to be able to replace the inbreeding instinct by heavenly resurrection, is the real cause of honor killings. This was a bridge too far, after the compromise of Abraham. This means, honor killings have always been there, but must have increased enormously in the last 1400 years.
The effects of honor killings were so frightening, that they bolstered a worldwide fear of the atrocities of the Muslim community, because if you are willing to go so low on human values, you must have a deterrent religion, be a horrible people.
And determent intimidation means another ground for honor killings as an integral aspect of the Muslim faith. It underlines the gruesome nature of Islam. Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith. And the effects on the Muslim population are devastating as well. Muslims hate honor killings, nobody really wants them, but somehow it generates respect under Muslims for Islam as well.
Assumption 467: Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith.
Even when after ages the devastating effects or honor killings became clear, Islam did not relax its resurrection dogma.
In modern terms Islam looks somewhat like a 'terror organization' and its believers as victims falling in love with their oppressors (the Stockholm syndrome in SM-dyad).
The picture below shows vector projections from the former culture of reincarnation (red) and the later culture of resurrection (pink) on the plain of Islam (better: the Muslim faith), where they create the psychotic and schizophrenic mess of honor killings. I think this mess is intentionally and not accidentally created by Islamic scholars. Because I have enough suspicion that this all was exactly known 1400 years ago. So, honor killings were intentionally created by Islam.
But, although resurrection was a function of reincarnation in the construction of the Muslim faith, now, 1400 years later both religions are still projecting on each others plane. Because inbreeding (SR) has not disappeared and the inbreeding instinct is much stronger than faith in resurrection. Without these two degrees of freedom one cannot understand the Muslim faith.
Pink is later in time than red, therefore resurrection must be a function of reincarnation. So, here we combine HR2 = f(HR1) with HR = f(SR):
Christianity is easy, since it broke with inbreeding and incest and was only embraced by outbred peoples:
Islam and Christianity are the extremes of the sadomasochistic dimension, which will collapse into the origin under lustful gravity:
Christian women have been in the majority since women's suffrage in the Western world. They replaced SM-dyad by Vanilla-dyad, which is unnatural:
Western women in powerful positions have everything, have it all but are sexually frustrated and unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad. This sounds ridiculously, I agree, but again, it solves the religion of Policor (political correctness) excellently. Combined with fading Christianity and Marxist relativism, this sexual component explains everything. All to find on this blog:
Women in top positions of politics and society are ruining Western culture in their unconscious search for sexual lust. Their policor (political correctness) yearns to real men again, now projected into SM-dyad from Islam. But they don't know, don't realize. So, Merkel doesn't realize why she drags all those immigrants into former Christianity, leading to Chrislam. Ask her, and she will answer it's all because of Christian values:
Christianity signifies masochistic yearning for sadism. Below are not my words:
Here we see how new religions are born out of sexuality. We are witnessing the birth of a new star in the sexual firmament: CHRISLAM
Why is sexuality sublimated?
In polytheistic cultures like the old Greeks the link between sexuality and 'religion' was quite visible, not to say there was no difference. But as soon as females are enforced inbreeding - where they naturally yearn to outbreeding - sexuality looses authority. Sexuality is not convincing for women, knowing males all too well.
So in monotheism (inbreeding) sexuality has been sublimated by ridiculous spells. It has become a transcendental metaphysical incantation. A good example is the Tree of Knowledge, which gives the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding.
But Desert Religions malformed this myth into something about 'good and evil'. God wanted inbreeding (good) in the original Myth of Paradise. Eve, who practiced 'evil' (bad) with the Serpent from another tribe, offered their child, the hybrid apple - or whatever translation - to Adam, who also was expelled from "Paradise" because he did not control his wife effectively:
The collapse of Islam after Christianity
The Muslim faith is a hybrid combination from Islam (HR) and Inbreeding (SR). Furthermore, resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1). But for Islam to terrorize reincarnation there must remain an awful strategy. But just like Christianity, the other Desert Religion, Islam's power is fading away.
Because the Muslim population is losing grip on females. Females who cannot be kept ignorant any longer, women with higher education than Muslim males, women with social media and smart phones. This all makes control on females illusive and that means the power of Islam (HR) over the former Inbreeding religion (SR) will diminish in 30 years. And that means resurrection (HR2) will lose its grip in favor of reincarnation (HR1), where the latter is based on the very powerful inbreeding instinct:
Islam will not disappear in name, but its religious strength will diminish. As long as the Muslim-group is maintained as an identifiable group there will be cultural and sexual developments. Predictably, the much stronger inbreeding instinct will leave a mark, especially on Arab and Asian original Muslims.
In the rebound earthly reincarnation (HR1) will overthrow heavenly resurrection (HR2), on which reincarnation becomes HR3 and a function of resurrection: HR3 = f(HR2=f(HR1)).
Earthly reincarnation (now HR1) becomes the 'new' religion called HR3.
So, a real interactive time series expansion can be expected. It all depends on social developments in the coming decades.
But also with the rise of HR3 (Inbreeding) are big changes to expected, because educated women will start to doubt the relationship between inbreeding and reincarnation as well as the parallel universe of Islam (HR). Maybe they merge with Christianity into Chrislam, a lot is written about Chrislam on this blog. So, Muslim women may not be involved with reincarnation (HR3) any longer because they do not believe this anymore. It will be a very complicated but most interesting development to derive in advance.
Authentic Muslims and newly Muslims
Following mtDNA L3N and L3M, only Arabs and Asians are authentic Muslims, possessing the inbreeding instinct from the Arabian Peninsula, 60-50 thousand years ago:
So, a billion Muslims are newly recruited Muslims. For example, Boko Haram in Nigeria practice outbreeding and that's why they recently captured a lot of juvenile females from neighboring tribes for outcrossing. Boko Haram are clearly newly Muslims without the inbreeding instinct.
Therefore, Boko Haram cannot regress to Inbreeding (SR), because they come from Voodoo (outbreeding) and so they will regress further into criminality from Australopithecus (Egotheism).
This means the Muslim faith will split up into:
1) Powerless Islam, women merging with Christianity into Chrislam.
2) Reincarnation with Inbreeding for Arab and Asian Muslims.
3) Criminality for newly Muslims in the religious mantle of the Muslim faith (Boko Haram).
4) Atheistic women.
For all these developments we can describe how they will be derived from the Muslim faith. All must be tied to Sexual Religion in HR= f(SR) and all must follow earlier religions in HR(x+1)= f(HR(x)). And of course, many more derivatives are conceivable. But for all 'new' religions it applies that they are at odds with previous religions, so that we can predict the course of events.
The evolution of religious concepts
In the evolution of religious concepts, reincarnation came about two million years before resurrection. So, reincarnation must be a much stronger and deeper lying concept than resurrection.
And rebirth below is not the usual 'rebirth' concept and quite different from resurrection:
What are the preconditions for the solution of honor killings?
Inbreeding is an unconscious Muslim male instinct
- Firstly, every year thousands of Muslim fathers kill their daughters without consulting other fathers, so there is no mutual contact among males. And this horrible act of killing their daughters also comes not from some weird and simple cultural narrative as 'honor of the family'. That begs the question, why are all these males committing the same crime at about the same moment in the development of their daughters? How come?
Would it be culture. Yeah, of course, culture does something. But to murder your daughter because of the opinion of the neighbours? Don't buy it. And now the juridical aspect. If every year two thousand fathers - without consultation - kill their adolescent daughters, is this sort of coincidence or is there a hidden general cause beyond their will? Is there circumstantial evidence that individual fathers are not totally responsible for what they have done, although legally guilty?
Don't get me wrong, where I want to emphasize that those killers are fully responsible for their deeds, with full liability for the law. But with hatred alone we cannot solve this problem.
A general cause was one of my bigger problems, of course because I already thought about the inbreeding instinct. But this was the reason to give that instinct a rational place in the chain of command to the kill. Otherwise personal liability for individual fathers would be too coincidental.
We conclude, in special situations Muslim males must be pre-programmed to honor killings. That's why they need no consultation with others, because they feel inside what to do. And this lowest level of horribly human functioning must be dictated by a much stronger impulse than that weird narrative of 'honor of the family', it must be caused by an instinct. So, there must be an unconscious underlying trait in the population, a kind of male inherited inbreeding instinct:
Assumption 336: The inbreeding instinct is a human instinct developed somewhere between Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and the Arabian Peninsula (Homo sapiens, 60-50 Kya; 1450cc). It is a typical male instinct which aims at earthly reincarnation into tribal inbred bodies enforced by cousin marriages. It is still vividly present in the Muslim culture. But maybe there was an earlier variant aiming at 'rebirth without soul' from Homo naledi (2.3 Mya; 550cc). But we reserve the inbreeding instinct for reincarnation with the soul.
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
'Honor of the family' is the wrong reason for honor killing
- Secondly, slicing your daughter into pieces is not especially the way of attributing 'honor to your family'. 'Honor' is a religious concept from Australopithecus (7 Mya; 400cc), combined with fertility stress, where daughters had to sacrifice their outbreeding instinct for 'cousin marriages' to prevent extinction of the species:
What we see above is that especially bipedal primates - living in groups together - developed a proneness to inbreeding as a way of life, and much later as a religion. So, inbreeding is fundamental to the core of human religion (genetic monoculture). All other (solitary) animals position themselves at the outbreeding pole of the basic dimension (genetic diversity).
We conclude: inbreeding is a sickness of human religion. Until Homo sapiens, previous hominins could stand inbreeding rather well because of their varied chimp like genome, but now it's devastating and developing massively autosomal recessive disorders.
So, we must take inbreeding very seriously as root of human religion. Then the question is which ancient religions could not get rid of inbreeding in the evolution? Well, the rank order on the basic dimension from inbreeding to outbreeding gives the degree of development in human religion. What kind of cultural development?
This dimension turns out to be parallel with 'respect for other sexual roles', especially for women. Females instinctively reject inbreeding as sick and unnatural and detrimental to the genetic variability of the species. Therefore Islam is lowest on the cultural ranking:
Women adhere outbreeding and that's why juvenile chimp females sneaky leave the tribe on their search for a new tribe, three trees farther away. Also human girls break more often with their parents than boys, except maybe in your case.
So, in inbreeding cultures females hate religion because it is used in SM-dyad to force them into inbreeding. Although they are also addicted to their masochistic role. Suffering is lust in masochism ...
Substituting 'honor' for reincarnation:
Proceeding with our former discussion: If 'honor of the family' is substituted for 'earthly reincarnation' the plot fits. That's also exactly what we hear from Muslim fathers, 'honor of the family' was the reason of the kill. Apparently, Muslims went back in the evolution to justify cousin marriages by 'honor' again. How come? Somehow, they must have regressed to 'honor of the family'.
So, I had to address non-communication between Muslim fathers and 'honor of the family', which is a terrible psychopathic dissonant.
The real reason for honor killings is earthly reincarnation
The ancient, but still alive inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus states that ancestors from inbreeding cultures demand genetically identical descendants for reincarnation. In those days you didn't want to reincarnate into hostile tribes. So, ancestors were thought to refuse reincarnation into tribes without cousin marriages, while their return on Earth was really needed for tribal survival because that lowered fertility stress (FS: low breeding numbers from bipedal primates). Of course, ancestors were nothing more than self-projections from males and were only used to create religious authority in women for inbreeding.
Remark: Early hominins and also Homo erectus had a much more varied genome and could resist inbreeding much better than Homo sapiens.
And guess what, this ancient instinct, this belief in reincarnation is much stronger than nowadays enforced belief in resurrection. But the problem is reincarnation has dived into the unconscious, whereas resurrection is conscious. This means, Muslims lost track on reincarnation.
Why has reincarnation become unconscious?
In history, Muslims are forced - on pain of death - to believe in resurrection in heaven from Allah in the parallel universe. So, believing in earthly reincarnation meant the death penalty in the last 1400 years. This means, Muslim fathers must have suppressed reincarnation as reason for cousin marriages in their unconscious and have fallen back, have regressed to the earlier ground for cousin marriages called 'honor of the family'.
The link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages is broken
So, the conclusion must be the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriage is broken in the conscious of Muslim fathers, but also in the minds of their daughters, who don't see any reason for being family semen incubator any longer. So, Muslims don't know any longer wherever honor killings are good for, but this inbreeding instinct is still vividly alive in their unconscious.
Now, think about it. You have an irresistible instinct for inbreeding, but you don't know why. But it is because you want to reincarnate into the pure tribal genetic descendants from your daughter.
Well, you dearly love your daughter, but if she refuses a forced marriage with her cousin, then you will end up in a psychotic conflict with this unwilling daughter. Not because you are a beast in the first place, but because you do not understand your own motives. You don't want to get lost in the universe as a ghost after death, a ghost who can't return into his own tribe any more, because of that damned hybrid descendant as the apple from Eve.
Muslim fathers want to reincarnate into their own tribal genes from cousin marriages
All honor killings because of pregnancy, abortion*, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc, have the same ground: Muslim fathers unconsciously, panically fear to reincarnate into offspring with mixed, hybrid genes. Because then, after their next death they are not pure tribal members any longer and will not be allowed to reincarnate into their own tribe again. But remember, they don't realize the reason of their panic fear, they think it's because of 'honor of the family', whatever that may be:
* Abortion means an ancestor has already been killed and possibly had first become a hybrid. This definitely deserves the death penalty.
Some remarks
A second remark is that total inbreeding is impossible and families make assessments that bears their approval. They can choose partners in whose descendants they don't object to reincarnate, usually persons from the same ethnicity. And they may also sell their daughters if they have little trouble with the inbreeding instinct.
A third remark is that a billion Muslims are not authentic Arab or Asian Muslims. Pakistani are original Muslims with the inbreeding instinct inherited (mtDNA L3M). But Boko Haram (mtDNA L2), captured 200 juvenile females lately from other tribes for breeding. That's outbreeding, since they originally came from outbreeding cultures. They do not have the inbreeding instinct inherited.
A rational explanation of honor killings
Although this explanation of honor killings may seem weird at first sight, this is not the case. Islam repressing reincarnation is a rational ground for fear. Furthermore, honor killers are usually in a psychotic delusional mood in which their unconscious steers their behavior beyond their conscious will. Therefore, they will disagree with this explanation and see themselves as quite normal. But themselves, they have no explanation for their behavior, except that ridiculous 'honor of the family', meaning they have none. They really don't know what they are doing, they are acting instinctively. They might see themselves as quite normal, what underlines their sickness.
A fight on life and death
So, what happens is simply a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter. If she refuses this cousin marriage, he will be lost forever as a ghost in the universe. That's a fight on life and death. And now we have the right parameters to give honor killings the right embedding, we must search for a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter.
So why is he killing her? Because if she is dead there is no risk to reincarnate into a hybrid anymore.
The heuristic value of the theory
A theory should be falsifiable and possibly parsimonious. Above theory will not easily be falsified, is very simple and gives an all inclusive explanation for honor killings committed because of pregnancy, abortion, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc. As long as we can predict honor killings on the basis of this theory it is useful and valuable. This means, it does not need to be true in the first place, although after seven years of painstaking introspection I found no other rational theory. Would there be one, I would definitely have found it.
The theory might be falsified for psychosis, because I think the suppressed belief in reincarnation leads to a psychotic state in honor killers. Then, it is possible to make the postulated inbreeding instinct conscious again, so that the psychotic state of Muslim males is removed. Then, we expect a decrease in honor killings by preventing psychosis. This would sustain the theory.
But a side effect can be that information about reincarnation just strengthens perpetrators in their belief and their willingness to kill, but then without psychosis. Then, they would deserve a suitable punishment in case of honor killings. A punishment without leniency.
Islam rejected the compromise of the Myth of Abraham
Assumption 468: Earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
Originally, the Myth of Abraham was meant for outbreeding cultures in which the male kin bonded lineage (from Abraham) took women from other tribes for marriage.
This because the myth does not speak of tribal cousin marriages explicitly and Negro-descendants were all over the place. So, that looks like outbreeding, originally.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
Outbreeding cultures:
In Voodoo, humans reincarnate on Earth and gods live in some parallel universe. That's the compromise from Abraham with God. It reflects the common religious attitude of Homo sapiens from far before the onset of the Desert Religions. That's a time lapse of 350,000-1400 = 348,600 years. But we arbitrarily set the Myth of Abraham at min 10,000 years:
I think the Myth of Paradise (boys initiation rite) originates from Australopithecus - speech not necessary - and the Myth of Abraham is a tradition from minus 350,000 years, because then Homo sapiens was already well developed to invent the parallel universe.
Abraham offered to kill his only (tribal) son Isaac to make earthly reincarnation into his descendants impossible and to prove his belief in God. But God was wise and accepted the compromise in which Abraham indeed worshipped the only God in heaven and rejected his ancestors as idols, on which humans still were allowed to reincarnate on earth. This means wise people wanted a compromise.
Inbreeding cultures:
Again, earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
For inbreeding we must change the interpretation of the myth:
Homo sapiens is the first hominin species with a seriously declined genome, see the supervolcano of Mount Toba. Therefore, the Myth of Abraham got a somewhat different meaning when inbreeding led to more and more autosomal recessive disorders.
Many thousands of years ago scholars knew very well that the inbreeding instinct was meant for earthly reincarnation into the own family. They also knew it was senseless to try to curb inbreeding into outbreeding, because of the inbreeding instinct. Then Islam simply forbade reincarnation totally and enforced resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe of Allah. This way, scholars might have hoped the inbreeding instinct would fade out too. Or they purposely tried to make a schizophrenic religion from the merge of reincarnation and resurrection, in which they succeeded very well.
So, Islam tried to curb 'inbreeding by reincarnation' to 'outbreeding by resurrection in the parallel universe'.
As said before, Islam rejected the compromise from Abraham and forbade earthly reincarnation on pain of death. The disruption of the stimulus-response chain from inbreeding to reincarnation is the real cause of honor killings. Therefore Islam bears the blame for honor killings.
BTW, understand that the inbreeding instinct dilutes by merging with outbred populations. Also that fully inbreeding cannot exist. Forty percent cousin marriages over a whole population is manageable.
Abraham's reverse honor killing
Killing your son to counter your reincarnation instinct, that's kind of heavy as well, that's very serious. That's psychopathic in feeling and psychotic in the execution. It falls in the same class as honor killings. To be precise, Abraham wanted to perform a 'reverse honor killing' on his son Isaac, what is on the same scale, on the same inhuman dimension. Abraham wanted to transfer the honor for his ancestors from earthly reincarnation (by inbreeding) to the honor for God from heavenly resurrection (outbreeding) (see this blog).
Thus, Abraham proposed what later Islam really performed: Islam extinguished earthly reincarnation. But God was wiser and proposed the Sacrifice Feast compromise:
Sacrifice Feast celebrates earthly reincarnation
There are a lot of myths in the Tanakh, so why are Muslims so delighted especially with the Sacrifice Feast. Would they unconsciously desire to return to earthly reincarnation? Would they be not faithful to Allah? Are they afraid of the final judgment of Allah? Is that why they want to return to Voodoo, to Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc)? Is that why they love this simple feast? If Muslims knew what the Feast of Sacrifice really means, it would be forbidden instantly:
How to prevent further honor killings
If this reasoning is correct the number of honor killings could be drastically lowered by raising awareness of Muslim males from the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages. Because the main reason for honor killings is the psychotic mental state of Muslim males, who do not understand what is happening.
How this blog started
On this blog I invented nothing new. I only found a rational basis for my subjective and sub-conscious feelings about the origin of human religion. Because, just like millions of other people, I intuitively felt the link between religion and sexuality.
Foreword to this blog:
This blog is my personal notebook and not written for a broader public.
What we see in the picture above is no coincidence. Islam is simply a magical function of the former inbreeding culture: Islam = f(Inbreeding). Causality here is time dependent. To be clear: resurrection (Islam) is just a magical function of former reincarnation cult (based on Inbreeding). Both concepts are magical and probably non existent. Their connection with the basic dimension is fake.
From time order derivatives to multiple regression
The simple natural function HR = f(SR) turned out to become a very complex multiple regression HR = f(SR1,....SRX) after 7 million years in a foregoing time series of simple successive evolutionary steps (f, f, f, f, f). But principally, the first steps were natural simple regressions on the basic dimension: HR = f(SR):
So the first (f's) were natural and not magical (f). With to much inbreeding first bipedal primates (Australopithecines) simply geared into outbreeding for a while. But at some point in the evolution, religion drove magically and uncontrolled away from the basic dimension and bogged down into a time series expansion, resulting in a lot of nonsense derivatives:(f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f). Then, the pink f's had no real connection with the basic dimension any longer.
And so developed magical strings of f's, creating sets of predictors for the next multiple regression on the previous religion. Thus, later religions are based on multiple regressions on previous magical nonsense: HR = f(SR1,....SRX).
But the odd thing is that the natural basic dimension is still used to produce these absurd magical outcomes. For example, 'inbreeding' as a natural stimulus is needed to get the magical outcome of earthly reincarnation for ancestors as a response. We think this is the postulated ancient inbreeding instinct, which magical fallacy dates from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and is suppressed in today's unconscious mind of Muslim males.
Concluding: Muslims might use inbreeding for genetic immortality (parental genes passed to the offspring), what is based on a sincere and natural connection: HR = f(SR).
But that does not explain honor killings: HR = f(SR). Honor killings are explained by enforcing inbreeding (cousin marriages) to offer a genetically quite identical tribe for magical reincarnation of Muslim males. At the time this instinct came into existence, males were afraid of reincarnating into hostile tribes, and that means honor killings are based on a fallacy in thinking, on magical and erroneous thinking.
Below the wording of the magical Muslim faith as a horrible combination of heavenly resurrection with earthly reincarnation, which 'water and fire' combination caused millions of deaths. Honor killings are not collateral damage from Islam. On the contrary, Islam is completely responsible and inflicted them:
How is it possible that Muslims in the evolution did not get rid of inbreeding. The only possible explanation seems a hereditary inbreeding instinct:
It's natural that species adhere to outbreeding, like chimps and bonobos. Outbreeding religions as Christianity and Judaism are natural too. But it's not natural that Islam fossilized in the Australopithecus inbreeding cult. No other group of bipedal primates got stuck in inbreeding since the start of the bipedal mutation.
Well, maybe Homo naledi:
Content validity from HR = f(SR)
What we see 7 million years after the bipedal mutation is that human religion is still stuck to the basic dimension. Besides the fake link (f), the natural link (f) between HR and SR as well remains fundamental to (Human) religion.
The reason is that 'religion' basically is kind of group bonding, kind of group identity, which often associates with ethnicity and race. So, religion underlines group identity and therefore inbreeding religions adhere to stronger bonding than outbred cultures. This is because aliens are excluded from the group. On the other hand, the farther a religion (Christianity) shifts to outbreeding the sooner it loses communality and falls apart as bonding:
By definition Muslims cannot assimilate without rejecting Islam, so they might integrate which means they follow the law, but never they will assimilate as a group:
So, because the deeper nature of religion is keeping groups together we understand the natural relation between religion and the basic dimension as ever lasting. Then HR = f(SR) is appropriate for mammals living in groups together. So human religion never get rid of the basic dimension.
In summary, there are two lines of reasoning (f) and (f) coming together at the basic dimension:
- The first is religions creating fake connections between the basic dimension
and HR in HR = f(SR).
- The second is the natural bond between the basic dimension and HR in keeping groups together: HR = f(SR). And it is this natural binding which is most fundamental for our analysis. Because the basic dimension is concerned with the group character of religion, which is also its basic meaning in the evolution. Both are forever connected to each other in HR = f(SR).
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
No fundamental difference between human and animal religion
Chimps and bonobos are also primates living in groups together, though quadrupeds. It will turn out there is no - not any - fundamental difference in religion between Homo and Pan, quite shocking and humiliating for us.
Mating within groups (arranged marriages) comes down to bargaining between inbreeding and outbreeding for not to go extinct. And that is exactly what we see in today's Islam.
But for single pairs, like gannets, full outbreeding is the norm for survival of the species. But for Christians, full outbreeding kills survival of the group. Because full outbreeding dilutes common moral grounds and leads to individuals without bonding.
This all means HR = f(SR) has a logical foundation, what is not revolutionary. It's remarkable though that the cause of honor killings rolls out. And the reason is that HR = f(SR) contains magical derailments between earthly reincarnation by inbreeding and heavenly resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe with Allah.
Additional degrees of freedom
To solve for honor killings we have placed an extra degree of freedom (SR) in the past and far before the onset of human religion (HR). But we needed another degree of freedom in the unconscious of Muslim males. And so, with two additional degrees of freedom we were able to address honor killings and possibly expand our understanding of the Muslim faith exponentially in the future.
The ancient, but still alive inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus states that ancestors from inbreeding cultures demand genetically identical descendants for reincarnation. In those days you didn't want to reincarnate into hostile tribes. So, ancestors were thought to refuse reincarnation into tribes without cousin marriages, while their return on Earth was really needed for tribal survival, because that lowered fertility stress (FS: low breeding numbers from bipedal primates). Of course, ancestors were nothing more than self-projections from males and were only used to create religious authority in women for inbreeding.
Remark: Early hominids and also Homo erectus had much more genetic variation and could resist inbreeding much better than Homo sapiens.
And guess what, this ancient instinct, this belief in reincarnation is much stronger than nowadays enforced belief in resurrection. But the problem is reincarnation has dived into the unconscious, whereas resurrection is conscious. This means, Muslims lost track on reincarnation.
Why has reincarnation become unconscious?
In history, Muslims are forced - on pain of death - to believe in resurrection in heaven from Allah in the parallel universe. So, believing in earthly reincarnation meant the death penalty in the last 1400 years. This means, Muslim fathers must have suppressed reincarnation as reason for cousin marriages in their unconscious and have fallen back, have regressed to the earlier ground for cousin marriages called 'honor of the family'.
The link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages is broken
So, the conclusion must be the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriage is broken in the conscious of Muslim fathers, but also in the minds of their daughters, who don't see any reason for being family semen incubator any longer. So, Muslims don't know any longer wherever honor killings are good for, but this inbreeding instinct is still vividly alive in their unconscious.
Honor killings play below the surface of the conscious. We better reject all conscious reasons related to 'honor of the family'. We must start from scratch and develop an honor killing model based on rational grounds.
Muslim fathers want to reincarnate into their own tribal genes from cousin marriages
All honor killings because of pregnancy, abortion*, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc, have the same ground: Muslim fathers unconsciously, panically fear to reincarnate into offspring with mixed, hybrid genes. Because then, after their next death they are not pure tribal members any longer and will not be allowed to reincarnate into their own tribe again. But remember, they don't realize the reason of their panic fear, they think it's because of 'honor of the family', whatever that may be:
* Abortion means an ancestor has already been killed and possibly had first become a hybrid. This definitely deserves the death penalty.
Some further remarks
A second remark is that total inbreeding is impossible and families make assessments that bears their approval. They can choose partners in whose descendants they don't object to reincarnate, usually persons from the same ethnicity. And they may also sell their daughters if they have little trouble with the inbreeding instinct.
A third remark is that a billion Muslims are not authentic Arab or Asian Muslims. Pakistani are original Muslims with the inbreeding instinct inherited (mtDNA L3M). But Boko Haram (mtDNA L2), captured 200 juvenile females lately from other tribes for breeding. That's outbreeding, since they originally came from outbreeding cultures. They do not have the inbreeding instinct inherited either.
The fourth remark is groundbreaking. Here we assume and have the premise that the postulated inbreeding instinct is inheritable, unless inbred populations merge with outbred peoples, on which the inbreeding instinct dilutes. Without this proposition honor killings cannot be explained rationally. But with this assumption the whole honor killing puzzle falls into place. So, you can choose. I have thought about this very well and many articles on this blog are about this inbreeding instinct:
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
So remember, if the inbreeding instinct is falsified the whole theory is loose. Then, if we forget about culture, there is no other general cause, no other explanation available why thousands of Muslim fathers kill their daughters every year. Why they commit the same crime without mutual communication. Well, Newton was also wrong but as long as it leads to the right predictions, don't bother. Anyway, the theory HR= f(SR) cannot be more parsimoniously.
A rational explanation of honor killings
Although this explanation of honor killings may seem weird at first sight, this is not the case. Islam repressing reincarnation is a rational ground for fear. Furthermore, honor killers are usually in a psychotic delusional mood, in which the unconscious steers their behavior beyond their conscious will. Therefore, they will disagree with this explanation and see themselves as quite normal. But themselves, they have no explanation for their behavior, except that ridiculous 'honor of the family', meaning they have none. They really don't know what they are doing, they are acting instinctively. They might see themselves as quite normal, what underlines their sickness.
A fight on life and death
So, what happens is simply a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter. If she refuses this cousin marriage, he will be lost forever as a ghost in the universe. That's a fight on life and death. And now we have the right parameters to give honor killings the right embedding, we must search for a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter.
So why is he killing her? Because if she is dead there is no risk to reincarnate into a hybrid anymore.
The heuristic value of the theory
A theory should be falsifiable and possibly parsimonious. Above theory will not easily be falsified, is very simple and gives an all inclusive explanation for honor killings committed because of pregnancy, abortion, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc. As long as we can predict honor killings on the basis of this theory it is useful and valuable. This means, it does not need to be true in the first place, although after eight years of painstaking introspection I found no other rational theory. Would there be one, I would definitely have found it.
The theory might be falsified for psychosis, because I think the suppressed belief in reincarnation leads to a psychotic state in honor killers. Then, it is possible to make the postulated inbreeding instinct conscious again, so that the psychotic state of Muslim males is removed. Then, we expect a decrease in honor killings by preventing psychosis. This would sustain the theory.
But a side effect can be that information about reincarnation just strengthens perpetrators in their belief and their willingness to kill, but then without psychosis. Then, they would deserve a suitable punishment in case of honor killings. A punishment without leniency.
RELIGIONS ARE FUNCTIONS OF EARLIER RELIGIONS, FOLLOWING THE EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF RELIGIOUS CONCEPTS:
EVEN QUADRUPEDS (CHIMPS) FOLLOW A RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENT WITH A STRIKING SIMILARITY BETWEEN HOMO AND HIS NEPHEW PAN:
IN NATURE, OUTCROSSING IS THE PRIMAL LAW OF PROPAGATION (QUADRUPEDAL PRIMATES). ONLY BIPEDAL PRIMATES INVENTED INBREEDING BY LACK OF OTHER TRIBES FOR THE EXCHANGE OF JUVENILE FEMALES:
RELIGIONS ARE FUNCTIONS OF EARLIER RELIGIONS. ISLAM IS A FUNCTION OF INBREEDING, BECAUSE IT WAS THE LATER RELIGION:
ACCORDING TO THIS BLOG, THIS IS NOT COINCIDENTAL: OUTBREEDING IMPLIES 'EQUAL SEXUAL ROLES', IN WHICH ALL ROLES HAVE THEIR OWN GODS. THAT'S POLYTHEISM (OLD GREEKS) AND SEMI POLYTHEISM (CHRISTIANITY WITH GOD, JESUS AND FEMALE SAINTS). OUTBREEDING REFERS TO OPEN GROUPS.
OUTBREEDING ALSO MEANS THAT CHRISTIANS ARE ALLOWED TO MARRY ANYONE, FROM ANY OTHER RELIGION, FROM ANY OTHER RACE OR ETHNICITY.
BUT ISLAM IS A CLOSED GROUP OF PURE MONOTHEISM WITH A SINGLE GOD, WITH ALLAH AS A MALE GOD, MEANING THAT FEMALE SEXUALITY HAS NO RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY. IN ISLAM WOMEN HAVE TO BE OPPRESSED TO COOPERATE WITH INBREEDING, SINCE THEIR NATURAL INSTINCT IS OUTCROSSING. IN ISLAM, WOMEN ARE OPPRESSED INTO SM-DYAD, WHILE CHRISTIANITY HAS VANILLA-DYAD AS EQUAL RIGHTS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.
ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY ARE OPPOSITE RELIGIONS ON A SEXUAL SCALE, CALL IT 'INBREEDING' VS 'OUTBREEDING' ON THE BASIC DIMENSION. BUT THEIR DEEPEST TRUTH LIES IN SADOMASOCHISM, OF WHICH SM-DYAD REFLECTS THE NATURAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE FROM BIPEDAL PRIMATES, STILL TO FIND IN ISLAM IN RAW FORM.
Below the wording of the Muslim faith as a horrible combination of heavenly resurrection and earthly reincarnation, which 'water and fire' combination caused millions of deaths. Honor killings are not collateral damage from Islam. On the contrary, Islam is completely responsible for inflicting them:
Honor killings, how it's made:
Eight years I searched for the cause of honor killings, from which I offered one year to my country for the MH17. I tried all strategies, dived deep into my unconscious for the sense of atmosphere around honor killings. That's how unconscious alignment works. It has been a rollercoaster of emotions, a horrible psychotic experience which was triggered by my immense anger (PTSD) about the killing of Sadia Sheikh. It struck me so deeply that I was determined once and for all, to resolve honor killings and religion altogether. I built my own religious model out of the animal world.
 |
| Sadia Sheikh R.I.P. |
I was shocked about how previously loving fathers could change into most brutal, horrible and gruesome animals. It was unbelievable. And after the kill they showed some cold and apathetic behavior. It is like psychosis, not able to differentiate between delusion and reality anymore. The satisfaction from the kill in the inner world of delusion, against the cold shower from the horror and anger of the outside world. To what extent were those fathers really aware of their situation? That's the core problem. And to solve this problem one must show empathy with these brutal murderers, but of course, no sympathy.
The crazy thing is I already owned the solution of this drama right from the beginning, but had no model. The model demands two degrees of freedom: Human religion (HR) and Sexual Religion (SR). But I was functional fixed and always thought Human Religion equals sublimated Animal Sexuality (SR), on the same degree of freedom. So, I came not at the idea of HR = f(SR), though sublimation delivered exactly (f), the second degree of freedom.
I wrote all possible scenarios and in the end I came out on the rational explanation of an impossible contrast between earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection:
I really think this is the best thinkable rational ground for honor killings. If there was another, let alone better solution, I would definitely have known. But there isn't.
So, now we have the formula, the model HR = f(SR), in which honor killings take place. But we still have to find the rationale of honor killings in this plot. So, what was the Muslim father thinking and how was his daughter reacting. The model only gives the precondition for the psychological diagnosis we have to make.
But we also know resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1), measured over time: HR2 = f(HR1). And again, we have two degrees of freedom to find the solution for honor killings. And this alternative function - theoretically based on a time series expansion - tells us Islam forbade earthly reincarnation, what is the crux to understanding honor killings. So, the conditions lie in the formula, which we have to interpret.
Resuming, for the explanation of honor killings we need Islam as Human Religion (HR), dependent on Inbreeding as Sexual Religion (SR), but we also need resurrection from (HR2) caused by reincarnation from (HR1). So, resurrection (outbreeding) and reincarnation (inbreeding) are based on the basic dimension in HR = f(SR), but are also connected in time, wherein reincarnation precedes resurrection in HR2 = f(HR1). Together this creates a strong causal effect in the explanation of honor killings:
- So, what we have to fill in is the relationship between inbreeding (SR) and reincarnation (HR): the inbreeding instinct.
- But also we must generate theory why resurrection (HR2) unsuccessfully tried to replace reincarnation (HR1), what created the devastating effect of honor killings.
Both effects are described extensively on this blog. The inbreeding instinct is a mega-effect from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), which caused not many honor killings, because fertility stress and reincarnation were well understood grounds for cousin marriage in those days. But Islam, thinking to be able to replace the inbreeding instinct by heavenly resurrection, is the real cause of honor killings. This was a bridge too far, after the compromise of Abraham. This means, honor killings have always been there, but must have increased enormously in the last 1400 years.
The effects of honor killings were so frightening, that they bolstered a worldwide fear of the atrocities of the Muslim community, because if you are willing to go so low on human values, you must have a deterrent religion, be a horrible people.
And determent intimidation means another ground for honor killings as an integral aspect of the Muslim faith. It underlines the gruesome nature of Islam. Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith. And the effects on the Muslim population are devastating as well. Muslims hate honor killings, nobody really wants them, but somehow it generates respect under Muslims for Islam as well.
Assumption 467: Honor killings are the Gestalt of the horrible symbiosis between two opposite religions: reincarnation and resurrection, acting as water and fire. They are the gruesome benchmark of the Muslim faith.
Even when after ages the devastating effects or honor killings became clear, Islam did not relax its resurrection dogma.
In modern terms Islam looks somewhat like a 'terror organization' and its believers as victims falling in love with their oppressors (the Stockholm syndrome in SM-dyad).
The picture below shows vector projections from the former culture of reincarnation (red) and the later culture of resurrection (pink) on the plain of Islam (better: the Muslim faith), where they create the psychotic and schizophrenic mess of honor killings. I think this mess is intentionally and not accidentally created by Islamic scholars. Because I have enough suspicion that this all was exactly known 1400 years ago. So, honor killings were intentionally created by Islam.
But, although resurrection was a function of reincarnation in the construction of the Muslim faith, now, 1400 years later both religions are still projecting on each others plane. Because inbreeding (SR) has not disappeared and the inbreeding instinct is much stronger than faith in resurrection. Without these two degrees of freedom one cannot understand the Muslim faith.
Pink is later in time than red, therefore resurrection must be a function of reincarnation. So, here we combine HR2 = f(HR1) with HR = f(SR):
Christianity is easy, since it broke with inbreeding and incest and was only embraced by outbred peoples:
Islam and Christianity are the extremes of the sadomasochistic dimension, which will collapse into the origin under lustful gravity:
Christian women have been in the majority since women's suffrage in the Western world. They replaced SM-dyad by Vanilla-dyad, which is unnatural:
Western women in powerful positions have everything, have it all but are sexually frustrated and unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad. This sounds ridiculously, I agree, but again, it solves the religion of Policor (political correctness) excellently. Combined with fading Christianity and Marxist relativism, this sexual component explains everything. All to find on this blog:
Women in top positions of politics and society are ruining Western culture in their unconscious search for sexual lust. Their policor (political correctness) yearns to real men again, now projected into SM-dyad from Islam. But they don't know, don't realize. So, Merkel doesn't realize why she drags all those immigrants into former Christianity, leading to Chrislam. Ask her, and she will answer it's all because of Christian values:
Christianity signifies masochistic yearning for sadism. Below are not my words:
Here we see how new religions are born out of sexuality. We are witnessing the birth of a new star in the sexual firmament: CHRISLAM
Why is sexuality sublimated?
In polytheistic cultures like the old Greeks the link between sexuality and 'religion' was quite visible, not to say there was no difference. But as soon as females are enforced inbreeding - where they naturally yearn to outbreeding - sexuality looses authority. Sexuality is not convincing for women, knowing males all too well.
So in monotheism (inbreeding) sexuality has been sublimated by ridiculous spells. It has become a transcendental metaphysical incantation. A good example is the Tree of Knowledge, which gives the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding.
But Desert Religions malformed this myth into something about 'good and evil'. God wanted inbreeding (good) in the original Myth of Paradise. Eve, who practiced 'evil' (bad) with the Serpent from another tribe, offered their child, the hybrid apple - or whatever translation - to Adam, who also was expelled from "Paradise" because he did not control his wife effectively:
The collapse of Islam after Christianity
The Muslim faith is a hybrid combination from Islam (HR) and Inbreeding (SR). Furthermore, resurrection (HR2) is a function of reincarnation (HR1). But for Islam to terrorize reincarnation there must remain an awful strategy. But just like Christianity, the other Desert Religion, Islam's power is fading away.
Because the Muslim population is losing grip on females. Females who cannot be kept ignorant any longer, women with higher education than Muslim males, women with social media and smart phones. This all makes control on females illusive and that means the power of Islam (HR) over the former Inbreeding religion (SR) will diminish in 30 years. And that means resurrection (HR2) will lose its grip in favor of reincarnation (HR1), where the latter is based on the very powerful inbreeding instinct:
Islam will not disappear in name, but its religious strength will diminish. As long as the Muslim-group is maintained as an identifiable group there will be cultural and sexual developments. Predictably, the much stronger inbreeding instinct will leave a mark, especially on Arab and Asian original Muslims.
In the rebound earthly reincarnation (HR1) will overthrow heavenly resurrection (HR2), on which reincarnation becomes HR3 and a function of resurrection: HR3 = f(HR2=f(HR1)).
Earthly reincarnation (now HR1) becomes the 'new' religion called HR3.
So, a real interactive time series expansion can be expected. It all depends on social developments in the coming decades.
But also with the rise of HR3 (Inbreeding) are big changes to expected, because educated women will start to doubt the relationship between inbreeding and reincarnation as well as the parallel universe of Islam (HR). Maybe they merge with Christianity into Chrislam, a lot is written about Chrislam on this blog. So, Muslim women may not be involved with reincarnation (HR3) any longer because they do not believe this anymore. It will be a very complicated but most interesting development to derive in advance.
Authentic Muslims and newly Muslims
Following mtDNA L3N and L3M, only Arabs and Asians are authentic Muslims, possessing the inbreeding instinct from the Arabian Peninsula, 60-50 thousand years ago:
So, a billion Muslims are newly recruited Muslims. For example, Boko Haram in Nigeria practice outbreeding and that's why they recently captured a lot of juvenile females from neighboring tribes for outcrossing. Boko Haram are clearly newly Muslims without the inbreeding instinct.
Therefore, Boko Haram cannot regress to Inbreeding (SR), because they come from Voodoo (outbreeding) and so they will regress further into criminality from Australopithecus (Egotheism).
This means the Muslim faith will split up into:
1) Powerless Islam, women merging with Christianity into Chrislam.
2) Reincarnation with Inbreeding for Arab and Asian Muslims.
3) Criminality for newly Muslims in the religious mantle of the Muslim faith (Boko Haram).
4) Atheistic women.
For all these developments we can describe how they will be derived from the Muslim faith. All must be tied to Sexual Religion in HR= f(SR) and all must follow earlier religions in HR(x+1)= f(HR(x)). And of course, many more derivatives are conceivable. But for all 'new' religions it applies that they are at odds with previous religions, so that we can predict the course of events.
The evolution of religious concepts
In the evolution of religious concepts, reincarnation came about two million years before resurrection. So, reincarnation must be a much stronger and deeper lying concept than resurrection.
And rebirth below is not the usual 'rebirth' concept and quite different from resurrection:
What are the preconditions for the solution of honor killings?
Inbreeding is an unconscious Muslim male instinct
- Firstly, every year thousands of Muslim fathers kill their daughters without consulting other fathers, so there is no mutual contact among males. And this horrible act of killing their daughters also comes not from some weird and simple cultural narrative as 'honor of the family'. That begs the question, why are all these males committing the same crime at about the same moment in the development of their daughters? How come?
Would it be culture. Yeah, of course, culture does something. But to murder your daughter because of the opinion of the neighbours? Don't buy it. And now the juridical aspect. If every year two thousand fathers - without consultation - kill their adolescent daughters, is this sort of coincidence or is there a hidden general cause beyond their will? Is there circumstantial evidence that individual fathers are not totally responsible for what they have done, although legally guilty?
Don't get me wrong, where I want to emphasize that those killers are fully responsible for their deeds, with full liability for the law. But with hatred alone we cannot solve this problem.
A general cause was one of my bigger problems, of course because I already thought about the inbreeding instinct. But this was the reason to give that instinct a rational place in the chain of command to the kill. Otherwise personal liability for individual fathers would be too coincidental.
We conclude, in special situations Muslim males must be pre-programmed to honor killings. That's why they need no consultation with others, because they feel inside what to do. And this lowest level of horribly human functioning must be dictated by a much stronger impulse than that weird narrative of 'honor of the family', it must be caused by an instinct. So, there must be an unconscious underlying trait in the population, a kind of male inherited inbreeding instinct:
Assumption 336: The inbreeding instinct is a human instinct developed somewhere between Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and the Arabian Peninsula (Homo sapiens, 60-50 Kya; 1450cc). It is a typical male instinct which aims at earthly reincarnation into tribal inbred bodies enforced by cousin marriages. It is still vividly present in the Muslim culture. But maybe there was an earlier variant aiming at 'rebirth without soul' from Homo naledi (2.3 Mya; 550cc). But we reserve the inbreeding instinct for reincarnation with the soul.
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
'Honor of the family' is the wrong reason for honor killing
- Secondly, slicing your daughter into pieces is not especially the way of attributing 'honor to your family'. 'Honor' is a religious concept from Australopithecus (7 Mya; 400cc), combined with fertility stress, where daughters had to sacrifice their outbreeding instinct for 'cousin marriages' to prevent extinction of the species:
What we see above is that especially bipedal primates - living in groups together - developed a proneness to inbreeding as a way of life, and much later as a religion. So, inbreeding is fundamental to the core of human religion (genetic monoculture). All other (solitary) animals position themselves at the outbreeding pole of the basic dimension (genetic diversity).
We conclude: inbreeding is a sickness of human religion. Until Homo sapiens, previous hominins could stand inbreeding rather well because of their varied chimp like genome, but now it's devastating and developing massively autosomal recessive disorders.
So, we must take inbreeding very seriously as root of human religion. Then the question is which ancient religions could not get rid of inbreeding in the evolution? Well, the rank order on the basic dimension from inbreeding to outbreeding gives the degree of development in human religion. What kind of cultural development?
This dimension turns out to be parallel with 'respect for other sexual roles', especially for women. Females instinctively reject inbreeding as sick and unnatural and detrimental to the genetic variability of the species. Therefore Islam is lowest on the cultural ranking:
It turns out respecting 'other sexual roles' (outbreeding) is the high point of human civilization. And now you see where culture, civilization, sexuality and religion find their intersection: showing respect for other sexual roles, especially women:
Women adhere outbreeding and that's why juvenile chimp females sneaky leave the tribe on their search for a new tribe, three trees farther away. Also human girls break more often with their parents than boys, except maybe in your case.
So, in inbreeding cultures females hate religion because it is used in SM-dyad to force them into inbreeding. Although they are also addicted to their masochistic role. Suffering is lust in masochism ...
Substituting 'honor' for reincarnation:
Proceeding with our former discussion: If 'honor of the family' is substituted for 'earthly reincarnation' the plot fits. That's also exactly what we hear from Muslim fathers, 'honor of the family' was the reason of the kill. Apparently, Muslims went back in the evolution to justify cousin marriages by 'honor' again. How come? Somehow, they must have regressed to 'honor of the family'.
So, I had to address non-communication between Muslim fathers and 'honor of the family', which is a terrible psychopathic dissonant.
The real reason for honor killings is earthly reincarnation
The ancient, but still alive inbreeding instinct from Homo erectus states that ancestors from inbreeding cultures demand genetically identical descendants for reincarnation. In those days you didn't want to reincarnate into hostile tribes. So, ancestors were thought to refuse reincarnation into tribes without cousin marriages, while their return on Earth was really needed for tribal survival because that lowered fertility stress (FS: low breeding numbers from bipedal primates). Of course, ancestors were nothing more than self-projections from males and were only used to create religious authority in women for inbreeding.
And guess what, this ancient instinct, this belief in reincarnation is much stronger than nowadays enforced belief in resurrection. But the problem is reincarnation has dived into the unconscious, whereas resurrection is conscious. This means, Muslims lost track on reincarnation.
Why has reincarnation become unconscious?
In history, Muslims are forced - on pain of death - to believe in resurrection in heaven from Allah in the parallel universe. So, believing in earthly reincarnation meant the death penalty in the last 1400 years. This means, Muslim fathers must have suppressed reincarnation as reason for cousin marriages in their unconscious and have fallen back, have regressed to the earlier ground for cousin marriages called 'honor of the family'.
The link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages is broken
So, the conclusion must be the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriage is broken in the conscious of Muslim fathers, but also in the minds of their daughters, who don't see any reason for being family semen incubator any longer. So, Muslims don't know any longer wherever honor killings are good for, but this inbreeding instinct is still vividly alive in their unconscious.
Now, think about it. You have an irresistible instinct for inbreeding, but you don't know why. But it is because you want to reincarnate into the pure tribal genetic descendants from your daughter.
Well, you dearly love your daughter, but if she refuses a forced marriage with her cousin, then you will end up in a psychotic conflict with this unwilling daughter. Not because you are a beast in the first place, but because you do not understand your own motives. You don't want to get lost in the universe as a ghost after death, a ghost who can't return into his own tribe any more, because of that damned hybrid descendant as the apple from Eve.
Muslim fathers want to reincarnate into their own tribal genes from cousin marriages
All honor killings because of pregnancy, abortion*, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc, have the same ground: Muslim fathers unconsciously, panically fear to reincarnate into offspring with mixed, hybrid genes. Because then, after their next death they are not pure tribal members any longer and will not be allowed to reincarnate into their own tribe again. But remember, they don't realize the reason of their panic fear, they think it's because of 'honor of the family', whatever that may be:
* Abortion means an ancestor has already been killed and possibly had first become a hybrid. This definitely deserves the death penalty.
Some remarks
A second remark is that total inbreeding is impossible and families make assessments that bears their approval. They can choose partners in whose descendants they don't object to reincarnate, usually persons from the same ethnicity. And they may also sell their daughters if they have little trouble with the inbreeding instinct.
A third remark is that a billion Muslims are not authentic Arab or Asian Muslims. Pakistani are original Muslims with the inbreeding instinct inherited (mtDNA L3M). But Boko Haram (mtDNA L2), captured 200 juvenile females lately from other tribes for breeding. That's outbreeding, since they originally came from outbreeding cultures. They do not have the inbreeding instinct inherited.
A rational explanation of honor killings
Although this explanation of honor killings may seem weird at first sight, this is not the case. Islam repressing reincarnation is a rational ground for fear. Furthermore, honor killers are usually in a psychotic delusional mood in which their unconscious steers their behavior beyond their conscious will. Therefore, they will disagree with this explanation and see themselves as quite normal. But themselves, they have no explanation for their behavior, except that ridiculous 'honor of the family', meaning they have none. They really don't know what they are doing, they are acting instinctively. They might see themselves as quite normal, what underlines their sickness.
A fight on life and death
So, what happens is simply a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter. If she refuses this cousin marriage, he will be lost forever as a ghost in the universe. That's a fight on life and death. And now we have the right parameters to give honor killings the right embedding, we must search for a fight on life and death between the father and his daughter.
So why is he killing her? Because if she is dead there is no risk to reincarnate into a hybrid anymore.
The heuristic value of the theory
A theory should be falsifiable and possibly parsimonious. Above theory will not easily be falsified, is very simple and gives an all inclusive explanation for honor killings committed because of pregnancy, abortion, adultery, Western lifestyle, rape, refusal from cousin marriage, etc. As long as we can predict honor killings on the basis of this theory it is useful and valuable. This means, it does not need to be true in the first place, although after seven years of painstaking introspection I found no other rational theory. Would there be one, I would definitely have found it.
The theory might be falsified for psychosis, because I think the suppressed belief in reincarnation leads to a psychotic state in honor killers. Then, it is possible to make the postulated inbreeding instinct conscious again, so that the psychotic state of Muslim males is removed. Then, we expect a decrease in honor killings by preventing psychosis. This would sustain the theory.
But a side effect can be that information about reincarnation just strengthens perpetrators in their belief and their willingness to kill, but then without psychosis. Then, they would deserve a suitable punishment in case of honor killings. A punishment without leniency.
Islam rejected the compromise of the Myth of Abraham
Assumption 468: Earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
Originally, the Myth of Abraham was meant for outbreeding cultures in which the male kin bonded lineage (from Abraham) took women from other tribes for marriage.
This because the myth does not speak of tribal cousin marriages explicitly and Negro-descendants were all over the place. So, that looks like outbreeding, originally.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
Outbreeding cultures:
In Voodoo, humans reincarnate on Earth and gods live in some parallel universe. That's the compromise from Abraham with God. It reflects the common religious attitude of Homo sapiens from far before the onset of the Desert Religions. That's a time lapse of 350,000-1400 = 348,600 years. But we arbitrarily set the Myth of Abraham at min 10,000 years:
I think the Myth of Paradise (boys initiation rite) originates from Australopithecus - speech not necessary - and the Myth of Abraham is a tradition from minus 350,000 years, because then Homo sapiens was already well developed to invent the parallel universe.
Abraham offered to kill his only (tribal) son Isaac to make earthly reincarnation into his descendants impossible and to prove his belief in God. But God was wise and accepted the compromise in which Abraham indeed worshipped the only God in heaven and rejected his ancestors as idols, on which humans still were allowed to reincarnate on earth. This means wise people wanted a compromise.
Inbreeding cultures:
Again, earthly reincarnation is a hominin instinct for inbreeding as well as outbreeding. Combined with inbreeding we speak of the inbreeding instinct.
For inbreeding we must change the interpretation of the myth:
God was wise and knew he could not expel the inbreeding instinct out of desert people, an instinct inherited from the Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). So, He permitted Abraham to reincarnate into the descendants of his only son Isaac. But on the other hand, Abraham had to discard earthly idols and somehow also to believe in the only God in the parallel universe. The Myth of Abraham obviously is a transitional form from the earthly universe to the parallel universe.Now understand what happened. Homo sapiens inherited earthly reincarnation from Homo erectus as an instinct and saw no reason to choose between reincarnation and resurrection. Only when the parallel universe became a source of power for the ruling class, Islam eliminated reincarnation.
Homo sapiens is the first hominin species with a seriously declined genome, see the supervolcano of Mount Toba. Therefore, the Myth of Abraham got a somewhat different meaning when inbreeding led to more and more autosomal recessive disorders.
Many thousands of years ago scholars knew very well that the inbreeding instinct was meant for earthly reincarnation into the own family. They also knew it was senseless to try to curb inbreeding into outbreeding, because of the inbreeding instinct. Then Islam simply forbade reincarnation totally and enforced resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe of Allah. This way, scholars might have hoped the inbreeding instinct would fade out too. Or they purposely tried to make a schizophrenic religion from the merge of reincarnation and resurrection, in which they succeeded very well.
So, Islam tried to curb 'inbreeding by reincarnation' to 'outbreeding by resurrection in the parallel universe'.
As said before, Islam rejected the compromise from Abraham and forbade earthly reincarnation on pain of death. The disruption of the stimulus-response chain from inbreeding to reincarnation is the real cause of honor killings. Therefore Islam bears the blame for honor killings.
BTW, understand that the inbreeding instinct dilutes by merging with outbred populations. Also that fully inbreeding cannot exist. Forty percent cousin marriages over a whole population is manageable.
Abraham's reverse honor killing
Killing your son to counter your reincarnation instinct, that's kind of heavy as well, that's very serious. That's psychopathic in feeling and psychotic in the execution. It falls in the same class as honor killings. To be precise, Abraham wanted to perform a 'reverse honor killing' on his son Isaac, what is on the same scale, on the same inhuman dimension. Abraham wanted to transfer the honor for his ancestors from earthly reincarnation (by inbreeding) to the honor for God from heavenly resurrection (outbreeding) (see this blog).
Thus, Abraham proposed what later Islam really performed: Islam extinguished earthly reincarnation. But God was wiser and proposed the Sacrifice Feast compromise:
Sacrifice Feast celebrates earthly reincarnation
There are a lot of myths in the Tanakh, so why are Muslims so delighted especially with the Sacrifice Feast. Would they unconsciously desire to return to earthly reincarnation? Would they be not faithful to Allah? Are they afraid of the final judgment of Allah? Is that why they want to return to Voodoo, to Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc)? Is that why they love this simple feast? If Muslims knew what the Feast of Sacrifice really means, it would be forbidden instantly:
How to prevent further honor killings
If this reasoning is correct the number of honor killings could be drastically lowered by raising awareness of Muslim males from the link between earthly reincarnation and cousin marriages. Because the main reason for honor killings is the psychotic mental state of Muslim males, who do not understand what is happening.
On this blog I invented nothing new. I only found a rational basis for my subjective and sub-conscious feelings about the origin of human religion. Because, just like millions of other people, I intuitively felt the link between religion and sexuality.
At about the age of ten I already grasped that Eve and the Serpent likely had a forbidden sexual relationship and that the apple was their child, with whom she misled Adam. My whole further life I was not interested in religion. But then, suddenly I felt the need to read the first three chapters of Genesis and was shocked by the strong and powerful formulations. I really was delighted and thought to understand exactly the double meaning of what was written. I also saw there had to be a rational model underlying. But how to transform my thoughts into a rational model, that was the problem...
So, I searched for an underlying rational model of Human Religion (HR). And for a number of years I tried to connect the dots. But I failed and got stuck in multiple regressions and the like.
And just when I thought no formula existed, I found the most simple and most obvious solution in the world: HR = f(SR). Why didn't I see that immediately? It's so obvious! Well, I was functional fixed:
Religion is a kind of breeding
The reason it took so long to realize Human Religion (HR) as a function of Sexual Religion (SR) is that I was convinced only Sexual Religion existed. My whole life I really thought 'religion' was a sublimated form of sexuality. Well, that is still possible with HR = f(SR). But to come to there, you first have to establish two mental entities: HR and SR.
So, I never saw religion as an independent entity, coming from God. It always seemed to me a disguised form of sexuality. What it is. Therefore, I was blocked to give 'religion' two degrees of freedom, needed to understand honor killings.
After years I inspected my Sexual Model of Religion (left side) and wondered: What the heck, why isn't religion placed in this model? Where is Islam in this model? And Christianity? (Judaism lies in between on the SM-dimension). And because SR was first in the evolution, it was clear HR had to be a function of SR: 'Religion must be a kind of breeding':
So, I searched for an underlying rational model of Human Religion (HR). And for a number of years I tried to connect the dots. But I failed and got stuck in multiple regressions and the like.
And just when I thought no formula existed, I found the most simple and most obvious solution in the world: HR = f(SR). Why didn't I see that immediately? It's so obvious! Well, I was functional fixed:
Religion is a kind of breeding
The reason it took so long to realize Human Religion (HR) as a function of Sexual Religion (SR) is that I was convinced only Sexual Religion existed. My whole life I really thought 'religion' was a sublimated form of sexuality. Well, that is still possible with HR = f(SR). But to come to there, you first have to establish two mental entities: HR and SR.
So, I never saw religion as an independent entity, coming from God. It always seemed to me a disguised form of sexuality. What it is. Therefore, I was blocked to give 'religion' two degrees of freedom, needed to understand honor killings.
After years I inspected my Sexual Model of Religion (left side) and wondered: What the heck, why isn't religion placed in this model? Where is Islam in this model? And Christianity? (Judaism lies in between on the SM-dimension). And because SR was first in the evolution, it was clear HR had to be a function of SR: 'Religion must be a kind of breeding':
Foreword to this blog:
This blog is my personal notebook and not written for a broader public.
That's why a lot of things won't be clear at first sight, but don't bother, it is written redundantly. Actually, I needed about 300 articles to compress my subliminal thoughts about religion into a parsimoniously written model: HR = f(SR) or HR = f(SR).
Because of this introduction and the fundamental importance of HR = f(SR) and HR = f(SR),
I will explain this stuff didactically as best I can:
There we go:
In HR = f(SR) is Human Religion (HR) a magical function of Sexual Religion (SR), which is the basic dimension of sexual procreation with inbreeding and outbreeding at the extremes. A magical function is mystical without natural basis. E.g. earthly reincarnation is a magical function of inbreeding. In other words, there is no connection.
On the other hand we have real natural functions from SR: HR = f(SR).
E.g. autosomal recessive disorders are natural functions of inbreeding. It is a real connection.
But there is a major natural function HR = f(SR), lying at the core of religion:
In religion, the most prominent example of a natural connection is to see inbreeding religions as having stronger bonding than outbred populations. Because aliens are excluded from the group. Outbreeding cultures do not keep the group together and eventually fall apart as bonding.
This means, Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
Assumption 465: Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
So, if the deeper nature of religion is keeping the group together with its remarkable group identity, we understand the natural relationship between religion and the basic dimension as ever lasting. Then HR = f(SR) is appropriate for mammals living in groups together. This means, human religion will never get rid of the basic dimension. The basic dimension is the main provider of religious ammunition:
Mammals living in groups together, bargaining inbreeding/outbreeding
Primates live in groups together. Therefore we involve the Alpha male (inbreeding), which rules about his females (outbreeding):
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
Magical functions
In HR = f(SR) the magical function (f) gives the transformation from animal sexuality (SR) to human religion (HR). Notice, 'sexuality' is not meant frivolously but as plain re-foundation of the origin of human religion.
Never in the history of mankind has developed such a simple magical function, which will not be falsified and already split the Muslim religion into two parts, which together explain the cause of honor killings:
Because of this introduction and the fundamental importance of HR = f(SR) and HR = f(SR),
I will explain this stuff didactically as best I can:
There we go:
In HR = f(SR) is Human Religion (HR) a magical function of Sexual Religion (SR), which is the basic dimension of sexual procreation with inbreeding and outbreeding at the extremes. A magical function is mystical without natural basis. E.g. earthly reincarnation is a magical function of inbreeding. In other words, there is no connection.
On the other hand we have real natural functions from SR: HR = f(SR).
E.g. autosomal recessive disorders are natural functions of inbreeding. It is a real connection.
But there is a major natural function HR = f(SR), lying at the core of religion:
In religion, the most prominent example of a natural connection is to see inbreeding religions as having stronger bonding than outbred populations. Because aliens are excluded from the group. Outbreeding cultures do not keep the group together and eventually fall apart as bonding.
This means, Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
Assumption 465: Human Religion (HR) is sort of bonding B, with (f = B) as natural function of Sexual Religion (SR), because it depends causally on inbreeding and outbreeding: HR = (f=B)(SR).
So, if the deeper nature of religion is keeping the group together with its remarkable group identity, we understand the natural relationship between religion and the basic dimension as ever lasting. Then HR = f(SR) is appropriate for mammals living in groups together. This means, human religion will never get rid of the basic dimension. The basic dimension is the main provider of religious ammunition:
Mammals living in groups together, bargaining inbreeding/outbreeding
Primates live in groups together. Therefore we involve the Alpha male (inbreeding), which rules about his females (outbreeding):
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
Magical functions
In HR = f(SR) the magical function (f) gives the transformation from animal sexuality (SR) to human religion (HR). Notice, 'sexuality' is not meant frivolously but as plain re-foundation of the origin of human religion.
Never in the history of mankind has developed such a simple magical function, which will not be falsified and already split the Muslim religion into two parts, which together explain the cause of honor killings:
What we see in the picture above is no coincidence. Islam is simply a magical function of the former inbreeding culture: Islam = f(Inbreeding). Causality here is time dependent. To be clear: resurrection (Islam) is just a magical function of former reincarnation cult (based on Inbreeding). Both concepts are magical and probably non existent. Their connection with the basic dimension is fake.
From time order derivatives to multiple regression
The simple natural function HR = f(SR) turned out to become a very complex multiple regression HR = f(SR1,....SRX) after 7 million years in a foregoing time series of simple successive evolutionary steps (f, f, f, f, f). But principally, the first steps were natural simple regressions on the basic dimension: HR = f(SR):
And so developed magical strings of f's, creating sets of predictors for the next multiple regression on the previous religion. Thus, later religions are based on multiple regressions on previous magical nonsense: HR = f(SR1,....SRX).
But the odd thing is that the natural basic dimension is still used to produce these absurd magical outcomes. For example, 'inbreeding' as a natural stimulus is needed to get the magical outcome of earthly reincarnation for ancestors as a response. We think this is the postulated ancient inbreeding instinct, which magical fallacy dates from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) and is suppressed in today's unconscious mind of Muslim males.
Concluding: Muslims might use inbreeding for genetic immortality (parental genes passed to the offspring), what is based on a sincere and natural connection: HR = f(SR).
But that does not explain honor killings: HR = f(SR). Honor killings are explained by enforcing inbreeding (cousin marriages) to offer a genetically quite identical tribe for magical reincarnation of Muslim males. At the time this instinct came into existence, males were afraid of reincarnating into hostile tribes, and that means honor killings are based on a fallacy in thinking, on magical and erroneous thinking.
Below the wording of the magical Muslim faith as a horrible combination of heavenly resurrection with earthly reincarnation, which 'water and fire' combination caused millions of deaths. Honor killings are not collateral damage from Islam. On the contrary, Islam is completely responsible and inflicted them:
How is it possible that Muslims in the evolution did not get rid of inbreeding. The only possible explanation seems a hereditary inbreeding instinct:
It's natural that species adhere to outbreeding, like chimps and bonobos. Outbreeding religions as Christianity and Judaism are natural too. But it's not natural that Islam fossilized in the Australopithecus inbreeding cult. No other group of bipedal primates got stuck in inbreeding since the start of the bipedal mutation.
Well, maybe Homo naledi:
Content validity from HR = f(SR)
What we see 7 million years after the bipedal mutation is that human religion is still stuck to the basic dimension. Besides the fake link (f), the natural link (f) between HR and SR as well remains fundamental to (Human) religion.
The reason is that 'religion' basically is kind of group bonding, kind of group identity, which often associates with ethnicity and race. So, religion underlines group identity and therefore inbreeding religions adhere to stronger bonding than outbred cultures. This is because aliens are excluded from the group. On the other hand, the farther a religion (Christianity) shifts to outbreeding the sooner it loses communality and falls apart as bonding:
By definition Muslims cannot assimilate without rejecting Islam, so they might integrate which means they follow the law, but never they will assimilate as a group:
In summary, there are two lines of reasoning (f) and (f) coming together at the basic dimension:
- The first is religions creating fake connections between the basic dimension
and HR in HR = f(SR).
- The second is the natural bond between the basic dimension and HR in keeping groups together: HR = f(SR). And it is this natural binding which is most fundamental for our analysis. Because the basic dimension is concerned with the group character of religion, which is also its basic meaning in the evolution. Both are forever connected to each other in HR = f(SR).
In conclusion:
Assumption 464: As long as bipedal primates live in groups together, they remain stuck to the basic dimension, ranging from inbreeding to outbreeding. Belief in God is not necessary.
No fundamental difference between human and animal religion
Chimps and bonobos are also primates living in groups together, though quadrupeds. It will turn out there is no - not any - fundamental difference in religion between Homo and Pan, quite shocking and humiliating for us.
Mating within groups (arranged marriages) comes down to bargaining between inbreeding and outbreeding for not to go extinct. And that is exactly what we see in today's Islam.
But for single pairs, like gannets, full outbreeding is the norm for survival of the species. But for Christians, full outbreeding kills survival of the group. Because full outbreeding dilutes common moral grounds and leads to individuals without bonding.
This all means HR = f(SR) has a logical foundation, what is not revolutionary. It's remarkable though that the cause of honor killings rolls out. And the reason is that HR = f(SR) contains magical derailments between earthly reincarnation by inbreeding and heavenly resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe with Allah.
Additional degrees of freedom
To solve for honor killings we have placed an extra degree of freedom (SR) in the past and far before the onset of human religion (HR). But we needed another degree of freedom in the unconscious of Muslim males. And so, with two additional degrees of freedom we were able to address honor killings and possibly expand our understanding of the Muslim faith exponentially in the future.
Notice, both additional degrees are based on facts. We always forget about the effects of the unconscious on our behavior and Islam covers the area of inbreeding perfectly.
Is animal sexuality (SR) the baseline of our civilization?
If animal sexuality (SR) is the baseline, increasingly complex magical functions must be invented to fit in with today's advanced forms of human religion (HR).
With this null measurement (SR), we can order human religions on whatever scale we want: maybe civilization? Well, that's way to simple. Because, would animal sexuality be uncivilized religion? With pairwise living monogamous gannets that stay together for about 50 years, almost permanently in danger on the seas? And female deer that choose their male? Compare this with Islam:
Maybe there's not much difference between animal religion and human religion. And speaking of civilization, what about the Muslim civilization? Well, don't forget Christians either...
Is human religion (HR) per definition more civilized, with higher moral standards than animal sexuality (SR)? No, below we show our doubts concerning our highest human value:
All sexual roles are equally respected
Bonobo civilization might turn out to be the most civilized 'human' religion on Earth. Am I throwing up civilization, civility, sexuality and religion? Well, why not? What core value would make the difference? This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue:
(59) The Killer Hominid
Panini
Seven million years of evolution created somewhat different species for Panini:
Chimpanzees are called Panini and human like creatures are called Hominini. Chimpanzees and Hominini diverged as Homininae from the common ancestor Hominidae, about 14 - 7 million years ago (mya). About 6-5 mya, Panini and Hominini split apart. Fewer than one million years ago the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) species effectively separated as DNA evidence suggests.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11128.html
Two African apes are the closest living relatives of humans: the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus). Although they are similar in many respects, bonobos and chimpanzees differ strikingly in key social and sexual behaviours1, 2, 3, 4, and for some of these traits they show more similarity with humans than with each other.
Here we report the sequencing and assembly of the bonobo genome to study its evolutionary relationship with the chimpanzee and human genomes. We find that more than three per cent of the human genome is more closely related to either the bonobo or the chimpanzee genome than these are to each other. These regions allow various aspects of the ancestry of the two ape species to be reconstructed. In addition, many of the regions that overlap genes may eventually help us understand the genetic basis of phenotypes that humans share with one of the two apes to the exclusion of the other.
This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue.
It concludes polytheism (outbreeding) as being much more civilized than monotheism (inbreeding) and more humane than Desert Religions. But remember, Christianity and moderate Judaism converged to (semi-) polytheism (outbreeding) in the evolution. Only Islam remained monotheistic (inbreeding) without any respect for female gods (other sexual roles):
It turns out respecting 'other sexual roles' (outbreeding) is the high point of human civilization. And now you see where culture, civilization, sexuality and religion find their intersection: showing respect for other sexual roles, especially women.
But beware, respecting 'other sexual roles' is also the end stage of Christianity, what comes down to the Democrats in the US. It's the end stage of the group with common values. It's Marxist relativism und der Untergang des Abendlandes.
So, Sodom and Gomorrah from the bonobos will be the endplay of Western Civilization. This is not a value judgment but a gloomy prediction. That's also where this blog is all about:
What error did we make in comparing sexual religion (SR) with human religion (HR)? The basic dimension (SR) is amoral. It is just the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding. So, in principle the entire moral structure of human Religion (HR), reflected in its magical function (f) is though based on the basic dimension, but this only for the amoral and pure physical aspects of inbreeding vs. outbreeding. So, Human Religion (HR) has everything to do with the basic dimension (SR), but the latter nothing with the former.
This means Human Religion (HR) is only associated with the basic dimension by magical human thinking over millions of years. Well, this only for the magical part of religion.
And meanwhile we found another degree of freedom. Bonobos and chimps have Animal Religion (AR) which is not principally different from human religion. So, we have Human Religion (HR), Animal Religion (AR) and Sexual Religion (SR). And because there are no rules defined by God, there is no difference between Homo and Pan:
Bonobos have developed magical functions of the basic dimension as well and there is a striking similarity between Homo and Pan. Because, bonobos came out on exactly the same point as Christianity. Our nephews converged in the same point of civilization as us, then, how civilized are we? So, there cannot be so much difference between Homo and Pan. It's chilling but we might be animals too:
Outbreeding is the basic law to propagate the species, meaning all animals project on the outbreeding pole of the basic dimension for not to go extinct. And so quadrupedal primates (chimps) adhere the male kin bonded lineage and exchange juvenile females with other tribes, three trees farther. Well, it's somewhat different because juvenile females possess the outbreeding instinct and leave the tribe sneaky. But besides that, chimps have an enormous varied genome and won't easily die out from inbreeding. Just like the first bipedal primates (Australopiths).
We see bonobos adhere outbreeding too, because their female kin bonded lineage doesn't keep males as prisoners (just like chimps don't terrorize females). Bonobo males are just fond of their submissive roles, just like masochistic Christian males.
These feminine males are stuck to Vanilla-dyad too. And even more than Christians, bonobos respect 'other sexual roles'. So, how special are we? We are stupidly arrogant Homo sapiens, because Homo naledi with half our brain was much wiser and rejected stupid magical thinking as the soul.
And now we are coming somewhere. Seven million years ago bipedal primates lost sight on other tribes and were designated on inbreeding, which became an identity marker, on which inbreeding developed magically into religion. That's the reason why bipedal primates religion is born out of the inbreeding pole of the basic dimension. To repeat, religion projects on the basic dimension, but the latter has nothing to do with 'religion'.
Proceeding:
We conclude, the occult and esoteric upgrading of nowadays human religion is totally in the chosen function (f). Actually, with (f) we place additional degrees of freedom between the human world and the animal world. Then, in retrospect we must be able to return from Catholicism (HR) to animal sexuality (SR) by choosing the proper (f). No matter how mystical a religion, we will find the proper inverse f-transformation back to the animal world.
Comparing Desert Religions on HR = f (SR), and compairing interval with ratio scale meanwhile
The above figure is a projection on interval level, only for conceptual understanding. Since, actually the rate of inbreeding is derived from the number of autosomal recessive disorders in a population. For outbreeding this number drops and for inbreeding it increases. Ratio scale has a real zero point. But of course, there are more sophisticated methods to determine the rate of inbreeding in a population.
Depending on other determining variables, inbreeding and outbreeding need not lie in line on the same dimension. Sometimes opposite parts of the same conceptual dimension fall out of line and can be negatively correlated as two vectors from the origin with an obtuse angle. Then, we need a rank = 2 setup.
Inbreeding is good and outbreeding is evil
But inbreeding and outbreeding can also be positively correlated, because total inbreeding for Homo sapiens definitely leads to extinction within a given number of generations. So, where is inbreeding, there must be also outbreeding. The holy grail in Sexual Religion lies around 40% inbreeding against 60% outbreeding:
Even without data we can make clear, difficult to describe situations, for example:
Christianity and Islam as having an obtuse angle within the Archetype subspace. Well, I see, the plot had to be rotated somewhat more 😓:
Main breakthroughs and struggles:
There have been some difficult turning points which have delayed the analysis.
Is animal sexuality (SR) the baseline of our civilization?
If animal sexuality (SR) is the baseline, increasingly complex magical functions must be invented to fit in with today's advanced forms of human religion (HR).
With this null measurement (SR), we can order human religions on whatever scale we want: maybe civilization? Well, that's way to simple. Because, would animal sexuality be uncivilized religion? With pairwise living monogamous gannets that stay together for about 50 years, almost permanently in danger on the seas? And female deer that choose their male? Compare this with Islam:
Maybe there's not much difference between animal religion and human religion. And speaking of civilization, what about the Muslim civilization? Well, don't forget Christians either...
Is human religion (HR) per definition more civilized, with higher moral standards than animal sexuality (SR)? No, below we show our doubts concerning our highest human value:
All sexual roles are equally respected
Bonobo civilization might turn out to be the most civilized 'human' religion on Earth. Am I throwing up civilization, civility, sexuality and religion? Well, why not? What core value would make the difference? This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue:
(59) The Killer Hominid
Panini
Seven million years of evolution created somewhat different species for Panini:
Chimpanzees are called Panini and human like creatures are called Hominini. Chimpanzees and Hominini diverged as Homininae from the common ancestor Hominidae, about 14 - 7 million years ago (mya). About 6-5 mya, Panini and Hominini split apart. Fewer than one million years ago the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) species effectively separated as DNA evidence suggests.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11128.html
Two African apes are the closest living relatives of humans: the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus). Although they are similar in many respects, bonobos and chimpanzees differ strikingly in key social and sexual behaviours1, 2, 3, 4, and for some of these traits they show more similarity with humans than with each other.
Here we report the sequencing and assembly of the bonobo genome to study its evolutionary relationship with the chimpanzee and human genomes. We find that more than three per cent of the human genome is more closely related to either the bonobo or the chimpanzee genome than these are to each other. These regions allow various aspects of the ancestry of the two ape species to be reconstructed. In addition, many of the regions that overlap genes may eventually help us understand the genetic basis of phenotypes that humans share with one of the two apes to the exclusion of the other.
This blog drew a number of important conclusions regarding this fascinating issue.
It concludes polytheism (outbreeding) as being much more civilized than monotheism (inbreeding) and more humane than Desert Religions. But remember, Christianity and moderate Judaism converged to (semi-) polytheism (outbreeding) in the evolution. Only Islam remained monotheistic (inbreeding) without any respect for female gods (other sexual roles):
It turns out respecting 'other sexual roles' (outbreeding) is the high point of human civilization. And now you see where culture, civilization, sexuality and religion find their intersection: showing respect for other sexual roles, especially women.
But beware, respecting 'other sexual roles' is also the end stage of Christianity, what comes down to the Democrats in the US. It's the end stage of the group with common values. It's Marxist relativism und der Untergang des Abendlandes.
So, Sodom and Gomorrah from the bonobos will be the endplay of Western Civilization. This is not a value judgment but a gloomy prediction. That's also where this blog is all about:
What error did we make in comparing sexual religion (SR) with human religion (HR)? The basic dimension (SR) is amoral. It is just the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding. So, in principle the entire moral structure of human Religion (HR), reflected in its magical function (f) is though based on the basic dimension, but this only for the amoral and pure physical aspects of inbreeding vs. outbreeding. So, Human Religion (HR) has everything to do with the basic dimension (SR), but the latter nothing with the former.
This means Human Religion (HR) is only associated with the basic dimension by magical human thinking over millions of years. Well, this only for the magical part of religion.
And meanwhile we found another degree of freedom. Bonobos and chimps have Animal Religion (AR) which is not principally different from human religion. So, we have Human Religion (HR), Animal Religion (AR) and Sexual Religion (SR). And because there are no rules defined by God, there is no difference between Homo and Pan:
Bonobos have developed magical functions of the basic dimension as well and there is a striking similarity between Homo and Pan. Because, bonobos came out on exactly the same point as Christianity. Our nephews converged in the same point of civilization as us, then, how civilized are we? So, there cannot be so much difference between Homo and Pan. It's chilling but we might be animals too:
We see bonobos adhere outbreeding too, because their female kin bonded lineage doesn't keep males as prisoners (just like chimps don't terrorize females). Bonobo males are just fond of their submissive roles, just like masochistic Christian males.
These feminine males are stuck to Vanilla-dyad too. And even more than Christians, bonobos respect 'other sexual roles'. So, how special are we? We are stupidly arrogant Homo sapiens, because Homo naledi with half our brain was much wiser and rejected stupid magical thinking as the soul.
And now we are coming somewhere. Seven million years ago bipedal primates lost sight on other tribes and were designated on inbreeding, which became an identity marker, on which inbreeding developed magically into religion. That's the reason why bipedal primates religion is born out of the inbreeding pole of the basic dimension. To repeat, religion projects on the basic dimension, but the latter has nothing to do with 'religion'.
We conclude, the occult and esoteric upgrading of nowadays human religion is totally in the chosen function (f). Actually, with (f) we place additional degrees of freedom between the human world and the animal world. Then, in retrospect we must be able to return from Catholicism (HR) to animal sexuality (SR) by choosing the proper (f). No matter how mystical a religion, we will find the proper inverse f-transformation back to the animal world.
Comparing Desert Religions on HR = f (SR), and compairing interval with ratio scale meanwhile
The above figure is a projection on interval level, only for conceptual understanding. Since, actually the rate of inbreeding is derived from the number of autosomal recessive disorders in a population. For outbreeding this number drops and for inbreeding it increases. Ratio scale has a real zero point. But of course, there are more sophisticated methods to determine the rate of inbreeding in a population.
Depending on other determining variables, inbreeding and outbreeding need not lie in line on the same dimension. Sometimes opposite parts of the same conceptual dimension fall out of line and can be negatively correlated as two vectors from the origin with an obtuse angle. Then, we need a rank = 2 setup.
Inbreeding is good and outbreeding is evil
But inbreeding and outbreeding can also be positively correlated, because total inbreeding for Homo sapiens definitely leads to extinction within a given number of generations. So, where is inbreeding, there must be also outbreeding. The holy grail in Sexual Religion lies around 40% inbreeding against 60% outbreeding:
Even without data we can make clear, difficult to describe situations, for example:
Christianity and Islam as having an obtuse angle within the Archetype subspace. Well, I see, the plot had to be rotated somewhat more 😓:
Main breakthroughs and struggles:
There have been some difficult turning points which have delayed the analysis.
The remedy was always to implement extra degrees of freedom in the theory for better understanding:
- For example, honor killings are understandable only by adding an extra degree of freedom to the unconscious of Muslim males.
- Sexual Religion (SR) is an extra degree of freedom between animals (quadrupedal primates, chimps) and Hominins (bipedal primates, humans) to understand Human Religion (HR).
- It follows (from SR = inbreeding) the Muslim faith can be split into two religions for better understanding. It is a hybrid from inbreeding (SR) and Islam (HR).
Now, here we see the heuristic value of the introduction of Sexual Religion, since the Muslim faith appears to be a hybrid from two religions, in which earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection are as water and fire. This means HR = f(SR) explains the state of the art of the Muslim faith. The Muslim faith is not balanced but full of contradictions.
Now, here we see the heuristic value of the introduction of Sexual Religion, since the Muslim faith appears to be a hybrid from two religions, in which earthly reincarnation and heavenly resurrection are as water and fire. This means HR = f(SR) explains the state of the art of the Muslim faith. The Muslim faith is not balanced but full of contradictions.
1) A crucial moment was when I realized that the relationship between sexuality and religion is about 'nature (quality) and number (quantity)', where I first neglected 'nature'. I thought for the first hominids the number of children in the relationship between husband and wife was most important (fertility stress). But then I learned 'nature' (yellow) concerns the (religious) quality of the offspring, which led to the forced choice between inbreeding and outbreeding:
Original Myth of Paradise (HR) is a function (f) of the Basic Dimension (SR)
Inbreeding underlined group identity (religion) from bipedal primates. And that is precisely the principal difference between Adam and the Serpent from that other tribe. So, in this original paradise narrative we already see human religion (HR) as derived from sexual religion (SR), in HR = f(SR). This, because the religious measure (HR) was taken (f) from the basic dimension of sexual religion (SR). Because the function was taken from inbreeding versus outbreeding.
So, the original Myth of Paradise from the first bipedal primates (Australopithecines) was already based on the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding and concerned countering female adultery with aliens.
Original Myth of Paradise (HR) is a function (f) of the Basic Dimension (SR)
Inbreeding underlined group identity (religion) from bipedal primates. And that is precisely the principal difference between Adam and the Serpent from that other tribe. So, in this original paradise narrative we already see human religion (HR) as derived from sexual religion (SR), in HR = f(SR). This, because the religious measure (HR) was taken (f) from the basic dimension of sexual religion (SR). Because the function was taken from inbreeding versus outbreeding.
So, the original Myth of Paradise from the first bipedal primates (Australopithecines) was already based on the choice between inbreeding and outbreeding and concerned countering female adultery with aliens.
2) In addition to the former (adding inbreeding vs. outbreeding as a quality aspect), my second major insight was that Alpha males (God) practiced inbreeding in the core of the group, while females in the mantle (Eve) adhered outbreeding and were adulterous to males from outside (the Serpent). And that's why the outrageous monotheistic God (inbreeding) thundered:
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-3/
15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Also here we see the outrage of God (HR) as a clear function (f) of sexual religion (SR, against outbreeding). And again, the function itself is characterized by threatening females, subject to inbreeding, where their natural instinct is outbreeding. So, with inbreeding cultures the nature of the conversion (f) from SR to HR is always female oppression. That's also exactly the difference between Islam (inbreeding) and Christianity (outbreeding).
Christianity and Judaism are also functions of the basic dimension, but they project on the outbreeding part. Jews practice the female kin bonded lineage, with female mtDNA, while women can marry whatever male they like (outbreeding):
3) Thus, the basic dimension is formed by an animal sexual component (outbreeding, hominids) and a human sexual component (inbreeding, hominins):
4) About 4000 years ago or much earlier, scholars must have changed the original paradise narrative to get rid of extreme inbreeding, which threatened the survival of Homo sapiens as a species, with his feeble genetic variation.
At some point in time from 10,000 - 4,000 years ago, scholars must have created a new paradise story, which is absurd and illogical, but now widely known and admired by billions of people. Still later, Romans reinterpreted Christianity and abolished inbreeding totally. Since then, Christians believe in a completely new paradise narrative about the fall of Man, without any reference to inbreeding:
The fall of man, or the fall, is a term used in Christianity to describe the transition of the first man and woman from a state of innocent obedience to God to a state of guilty disobedience. (WIKI)
But Islam tragically failed to ban the inbreeding instinct from Muslims and stranded in a dual religion:
5) From the first bipedal mutation - seven million years ago - primates thought rationally and were not stupid. They conceived the paradise narrative as a logical initiation rite for boys and were not as silly as we think. And speech was not required to explain males how to stop adultery from females.
They did not believe in 'the soul' and more of that uncorroborated stuff:
It is us who are the sick magical thinkers, not the rational Homo erectus or even Australopiths as Homo naledi. These vulnerable people would not have survived a single night in the African wilderness without a strong and rational brain.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
7) I struggled for a lot in finding the most parsimonious formula of human religion. And just when I tended to give up I realized how Human Religion was rooted in Sexual Religion: HR = f(SR). This simple and parsimonious formula has great heuristic value to understand human religion by generating new theories.
At the end of the day I hope to have found the most elegant model for human religion. A model that explains what religion can't explain from itself. Usually, religions command sacred rules for regular worship, complete with do's and don'ts. These rules normally concern sexual behavior of women. This blog pretends to explain where and why human religions are reluctant to understand themselves. Because it is embarrassing and revealing.
The Sexual Theory of Religion tries to explain the origins of human religion without reading any religious text other than the first three chapters of Genesis. Human religion started out of bipedal primate religion from about 7 million years ago, so why bother about the last 4000 years?
When the reader gets familiar with the abundant amount of visual representations as pictures, diagrams, figures and schemes, it helps to grasp new articles without reading. I myself use these visual representations as kind of shorthand for a quick scan of the content of older articles. And if projections and formulas are not clear at once, just proceed and the text will make the subject clear, extensively and ad nauseam.
Especially, article 230 is written for very young Muslim girls. But please, read it with others...
(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-3/
15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Also here we see the outrage of God (HR) as a clear function (f) of sexual religion (SR, against outbreeding). And again, the function itself is characterized by threatening females, subject to inbreeding, where their natural instinct is outbreeding. So, with inbreeding cultures the nature of the conversion (f) from SR to HR is always female oppression. That's also exactly the difference between Islam (inbreeding) and Christianity (outbreeding).
Christianity and Judaism are also functions of the basic dimension, but they project on the outbreeding part. Jews practice the female kin bonded lineage, with female mtDNA, while women can marry whatever male they like (outbreeding):
3) Thus, the basic dimension is formed by an animal sexual component (outbreeding, hominids) and a human sexual component (inbreeding, hominins):
4) About 4000 years ago or much earlier, scholars must have changed the original paradise narrative to get rid of extreme inbreeding, which threatened the survival of Homo sapiens as a species, with his feeble genetic variation.
At some point in time from 10,000 - 4,000 years ago, scholars must have created a new paradise story, which is absurd and illogical, but now widely known and admired by billions of people. Still later, Romans reinterpreted Christianity and abolished inbreeding totally. Since then, Christians believe in a completely new paradise narrative about the fall of Man, without any reference to inbreeding:
The fall of man, or the fall, is a term used in Christianity to describe the transition of the first man and woman from a state of innocent obedience to God to a state of guilty disobedience. (WIKI)
But Islam tragically failed to ban the inbreeding instinct from Muslims and stranded in a dual religion:
They did not believe in 'the soul' and more of that uncorroborated stuff:
It is us who are the sick magical thinkers, not the rational Homo erectus or even Australopiths as Homo naledi. These vulnerable people would not have survived a single night in the African wilderness without a strong and rational brain.
6) My sixth major insight was the finding of earthly tribal reincarnation from ancestors in an ancient Ethiopian Christian culture. Though this was clearly outbreeding, it also paved the way to earthly reincarnation through inbreeding by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc).
7) I struggled for a lot in finding the most parsimonious formula of human religion. And just when I tended to give up I realized how Human Religion was rooted in Sexual Religion: HR = f(SR). This simple and parsimonious formula has great heuristic value to understand human religion by generating new theories.
At the end of the day I hope to have found the most elegant model for human religion. A model that explains what religion can't explain from itself. Usually, religions command sacred rules for regular worship, complete with do's and don'ts. These rules normally concern sexual behavior of women. This blog pretends to explain where and why human religions are reluctant to understand themselves. Because it is embarrassing and revealing.
The Sexual Theory of Religion tries to explain the origins of human religion without reading any religious text other than the first three chapters of Genesis. Human religion started out of bipedal primate religion from about 7 million years ago, so why bother about the last 4000 years?
When the reader gets familiar with the abundant amount of visual representations as pictures, diagrams, figures and schemes, it helps to grasp new articles without reading. I myself use these visual representations as kind of shorthand for a quick scan of the content of older articles. And if projections and formulas are not clear at once, just proceed and the text will make the subject clear, extensively and ad nauseam.
Especially, article 230 is written for very young Muslim girls. But please, read it with others...
(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴
