(429) Human Religion (HR) from Animal Religion (AR)

 Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive 

(429) Human Religion (HR) from Animal Religion (AR)

(429) Human Religion (HR) from Animal Religion (AR)

There is essentially no difference between animal and human religion, if breeding is seen as the core of religion. Well, that looks like circular reasoning. Anyway I think my premise is right, religion is actually a kind of breeding like reincarnation and rebirth, which are conditioned on and linked to the birth process in the unconscious over millions of years. More distant derivatives like resurrection are also called religions but not sexual instincts, because not related to breeding. Resurrection exists only in the conscious:

Sexual Instincts (SI), Sexual Religions (SR) and Human Religions (HR):

Sexual Instincts (SI) are in the unconscious. But images derived from Sexual Instincts (SI) and displayed in the conscious, are called Sexual Religions (SR). But Sexual Religions (SR) can only be images from Inbreeding and Outbreeding in the unconscious, this by convention to streamline the formulas:

Although there are a lot of other Sexual Instincts (SI) in the unconscious, they are not named Sexual Religions (SR). This convention was chosen, because Breeding is seen as the real cause of religion. For example, calling reincarnation also a Sexual Religion (SR) would ignore the fact that Reincarnation itself is only a (magical) derivative of Breeding linked in the unconscious and is not breeding itself:

This simply means that the remedy for honor killings would be to allow reincarnation as the second religion in the Muslim faith after Islam's resurrection*. 

But that would change Islam from monotheism (Allah) to polytheism (plus divine tribal heads as reincarnating ancestors (Muslim fathers)): On the one hand we already have Allah as a single god (resurrection), then supplemented with reincarnation (multiple gods). Reincarnation has been around for two million years (Homo erectus) and resurrection (Allah) is not older than 300,000 years:

In polytheism, there would be more gods, more empathically accepted sexual roles in the conscious of the Muslim faith. This is because reincarnation is actually polytheism

where ancestors (including female sexual roles) are worshiped as multiple gods to tempt them into reincarnation:

 Where in our view gods are sexual roles:

But reincarnation in the Muslim faith does not really concern females and is actually meant for male ancestors, male tribal heads (serial monotheism, where all have the same sexual role as Allah: male heterosexuality). 

And that means that nowadays Muslim culture does not feel real empathy with females in the conscious, unless women creepingly follow their husbands: 

For Muslim males there is only one empathically experienced sexual role in the conscious: male heterosexuality. And if they even pretend to be empathetic to women, it always depends on his privilege: women must follow their husbands. 

And in heaven, inbred Muslims expect to get many women from other tribes available, as far as physical outbreeding is concerned, but not in our understanding because in their conscious they do not feel a penny of empathy with these blond Christian whores. Which makes hyperbolically clear what I mean:

In nowadays Muslim faith, there are multiple gods as ancestors from deceased tribal heads (family fathers from the inbreeding culture) who however have the same sexual role as Allah. So still a single sexual role is governing this culture: Male heterosexuality, which is replicated millions of times. 

In case women were also worshiped as female ancestors, and could reincarnate too, this would imply a third sexual role empathically experienced in the conscious of Muslims: female sexual roles. Then, Islam would become completely polytheistic. 

This dilemma of choosing between monotheism and polytheism stands in the way of the solution of honor killings:

This moment the only way out is awareness of Muslim women about reincarnation psychosis, as described extensively on this blog. But beware, any compromise will break Islam into 4 religions:

Would religion be that simple?

Religion can be pretty funny by the way. Here we see sexual empathy in the partner. Face to face from polytheism or outbreeding, genetic diversity:

For humans there is a split solution, because there is always a 'conscious' and an 'unconscious' component:

Sometimes women are ashamed of the unempathetic doggy style, where their partner doesn't look them in the face. Then they pretend to prefer Vanilla-dyad (Me Too Movement), what's not the real thing but cultural garbage. Vanilla-dyad sees the other as subject, SM-dyad as object, the real thing, can be.

Hyperbolically, the difference between animal religion and human religion is in eye contact for controlled affection.  And although animals can also love each other, they may not be able to make eye contact at the 'moment supreme', just about.

What are religions?

Religions are imposed changes on female sexual behavior, inferred by males from derivatives of female behavior on the dimension of Inbreeding to Outbreeding:

Below, religions move their projection on a two dimensional plane of inbreeding and outbreeding, thereby altering female sexual behavior. For example, females naturally tend to outbreeding (Christianity) but are in Muslim culture forced to project on inbreeding (cousin marriages, and marrying a Muslim):

This sick aberration towards inbreeding is first seen in the Alpha male model for mammals. Females remain adulterous to foreign males (outbreeding) in the periphery of the group (Eve with the Serpent), while the Alpha male engages in inbreeding:

This Alpha male model as a mixture of inbreeding and outbreeding is a deviation from  primal Animal Religion (AR) of solitary animals, which only aims on outbreeding, outcrossing or genetic diversity.

On the left (below) a reasonably healthy breeding model in which females are free to seek protection in exchange for mating, until they mate with a strange male on the periphery of the tribe (outbreeding).

Right, Muslim women without free will with a wealthy but possibly weak male, who will degenerate the species:

In the animal world the strongest man plays the role of Alpha male, but only for a short term until he becomes too old and someone else takes his place. But in the human world social status, wealth and family relations are more important than masculinity, so that bad genes and reduced intelligence result from inferior breeding (cousin marriages) while spreading autosomal recessive disorders:

In the animal world, there is a correction on the Alpha male model towards outbreeding, because females self choose their Alpha male (deer) and juvenile female chimps abandon their group for other male lineages:

But things went wrong in human evolution (HR: Human Religion), because there weren't always other groups to swap females with, and over millions of years, inbreeding became the dominant religion for bipedal primates:

No females to refresh tribal genome:

Of course they mingled with other tribes where possible:

For humans, steering of feminine sexual behavior by sick breeding is an ongoing process with its own dynamics. 

In addition, males hide sexual terror by letting females believe that there is a (male) God that prohibits adultery:

Therefore, successive magical derivatives obscured the original meaning of religion, which is tied to the birth process (Breeding), as in animals. And the longer it goes on, the more human religions tend to alienate inbreeding as the origin of bipedal religion:

It's as if males are ashamed of this purely sexual identity of religion: 

They hide their sexual wishes and sublimate religion into esoteric and transcendent swamps:

The development of human religion can therefore be seen as a long chain of successive derivatives to control female sexual behavior: 

But this esoteric development away from breeding to sublimated nonsense only takes place in sects, small religions for 'the better educated man'. Because they are ashamed of showing pure sexual lust as the basis of their "religion". They don't even realize what they worship.

The convincing proof of breeding as primal cause of religion is the blunt recognition of the birth process (Breeding) as principal factor by 85% of humanity:

Where Christianity is the inverse of inbreeding:

Christianity (outbreeding) + Hinduism (outbreeding within castes) + Islam (inbreeding by marrying a Muslim) means 70% of the world's population actually believes in breeding as primal cause of religion:

How Human Religion (HR) developed from Animal Religion (AR)

In the conscious a peacock makes a beautiful fan of feathers to impress females. 

This is his Animal Religion (AR), which is a function of an image (SR) of his Sexual Instinct (SI) to mate (AR=f(SR(SI))):

It is religion serving proper mating. But AR is only an evolutionary derived sexual cue, which has no coercive connection with mating itself. If you put a pair in a pen and shear the male, he will also jump on top of the female. It is just specific religious behavior conditioned on SR(SI).

In the same way, cousin marriages are Human Religions (HR) of Muslims' urge to mate. They are conditioned on images of their Sexual Instinct (SI; Inbreeding) to mate. 

HR = f(SR(SI)), in which SR is Muslim inbreeding from the bipedal inbreeding instinct (SI). It is their prescribed religion to come to mating. So, 'cousin marriages' are stimuli (HR) conditioned on the image of inbreeding SR=f(SI): HR = f(SR(SI)).

In nature Animal Religion (AR) (Outbreeding) and Human Religion (HR) (partly Inbreeding) overlap and alternate:

Human religion evolved fluidly from animal religion:

Assumption 660: Animal Religion (AR) and Human Religion (HR):

Animal Religion (AR):

Step 1: Animal Religions (AR) are direct functions of Sexual Religions (SR) and indirect functions of Sexual Instincts (SI): AR = f(SR(SI)). 

Step 2: Animal Religions (AR) are natural functions of Breeding: AR = f(Breeding).

Step 3: The natural Animal Sexual Instinct (SI) is Outbreeding: AR = f(Outbreeding).

Step 4: Sexual instincts (SI) are in the unconscious.

Step 5: But Sexual instincts (SI) represented in the conscious we call Sexual Religions (SR).

Again:

Step 6: Animal Religions (AR) are direct functions of Sexual Religions (SR): AR = f(SR).

Step 7: Animal Religions (AR) are indirect functions of Sexual instincts (SR): AR = f(SR(SI)).

Step 8: So, Outbreeding in the unconscious is a Sexual Instinct (SI).

Step 9: But Outbreeding in the conscious is a Sexual Religion (SR) by convention.

Step 10: In nature, Animal Religions (AR) are functions of Sexual Religions (SR).

Step 11: This means, Animal Religions (AR) are functions of Outbreeding: AR= f(SR).

Human Religion (HR):

Step 12: Human Religion (HR) is a function of Sexual Religion (SR): HR = f(SR).

Step 13: The natural Sexual Instinct (SI) is Outbreeding: AR = f(Outbreeding).

Step 14: But for bipedal primates Inbreeding is leading: HR = f(Inbreeding).

Step 15: Human religious evolution is characterized by the endless struggle between these two instincts: Monotheism (Inbreeding) and Polytheism (Outbreeding).

Step 16: Human Religions (HR) 

How Human Religion (HR) developed from Animal Religion (AR)

Animal Religion (AR):

Step 1: Animal Religions (AR) are direct functions of Sexual Religions (SR) and indirect functions of a Sexual Instincts (SI): AR = f(SR(SI)).

Sexual instincts (SI) are in the unconscious. But  images derived from Sexual Instincts (SI) and displayed in the conscious are called Sexual Religions (SR). 

Animal religion gives outbreeding as end result:

Peacock's religion is: Beautiful courtship: To make a beautiful fan of feathers to impress females:

 

Conscious images (SR) of inbreeding are impetus for monotheistic religions HR: (cousin marriages):

And conscious images (SR) of outbreeding are impetus for polytheistic religions HR: (Sodom and Gomorrah*):

* Outbreeding means to counter the terror of a single dominant God, the single sexual role: male heterosexual monotheism, where homosexuality is already the second god that goes into the direction of polytheism, much deity, which was the essence of Sodom and Gomorrah.

In strict monotheism, homosexuality is forbidden and portrayed as a a form of femininity. So, in monotheism homosexual males are married, normally. In polytheism there are two kinds of homosexual males: masculine and stereotypically feminine.

In the conscious, Sexual Religions (SR) are practical elaborations of underlying Sexual Instincts (SI) to be able to  lead to workable religions (HR). Sexual Religions (SR) are always derived from the particular Sexual Instincts (SI) inbreeding and outbreeding, by convention:

There are many Sexual Instincts (SI), which are characteristically connected with the birth process (breeding). Besides inbreeding and outbreeding, they are not natural sexual instincts but artificially conditioned on the birth process over time.

Step 2: Animal Religions (AR) are natural functions of Breeding: AR = f(Breeding), for animals, including inbreeding only as minor intervention to outbreeding. Male inbreeding in Chimp tribes is corrected by juvenile females leaving the tribe at about seven years of age:

Step 3: The natural Animal Sexual Instinct (SI) is Outbreeding: AR = f(Outbreeding).

The trait of outbreeding (SR) in animal behavior is a natural function of their outbreeding instinct (SI). SR is a natural derivative of SI.

Step 4: Sexual instincts (SI) are in the unconscious.

Step 5: But Sexual instincts (SI) represented in the conscious we call Sexual Religions (SR).

Would a species go over to systematic inbreeding then we still speak of a natural derivative of Breeding (SI). The reason is that inbreeding (SR) is also directly linked to the birth process: Breeding:

Inbreeding and outbreeding are the only Sexual Religions (SR) by convention:

In humans, there are numerous (religious) derivatives, that are driven away and not directly related any longer to Breeding. For example, heavenly resurrection is pre-eminently disconnected from Breeding. Therefore, resurrection is just a magical and indirect derivative of Breeding:

Again:

Step 6: Animal Religions (AR) are direct functions of Sexual Religions (SR): AR = f(SR).

Step 7: Animal Religions (AR) are indirect functions of Sexual instincts (SR): AR = f(SR(SI)).

Step 8: So, Outbreeding in the unconscious is a Sexual Instinct (SI).

Step 9: But the image of Outbreeding in the conscious is a Sexual Religion (SR) by convention.

Step 10: In nature, Animal Religions (AR) are functions of Sexual Religions (SR).

Step 11: This means, Animal Religions (AR) are functions of Outbreeding: AR= f(SR).

Human Religion (HR):

Step 12: Human Religion (HR) is a function of Sexual Religion (SR): HR = f(SR).

Step 13: The natural Sexual Instinct (SI) is Outbreeding: AR = f(Outbreeding).

Step 14: But for bipedal primates Inbreeding is leading: HR = f(Inbreeding).

Step 15: Human religious evolution is characterized by the endless struggle between these two instincts: Monotheism (Inbreeding) and Polytheism (Outbreeding):

Step 16: Human Religions (HR) 

Religions are direct or indirect derivatives of Breeding on the dimension: Inbreeding to Outbreeding. 

Natural derivatives are direct functions of Breeding. For example the religious rule to marry a Muslim is a direct but artificially conditioned function on Breeding, on the birth process. Reincarnation is also bound to the birth process and became a Sexual Instinct (SI) for believers since two million years. Reincarnation is indeed a direct derivative of Breeding. But if Reincarnation does not really exist we speak of a magical derivative of Breeding, although bonded to the birth process. Resurrection is just a magical derivative of Reincarnation, and not of the birth process. It was invented precisely to avoid (In)breeding. Therefore, Resurrection is only indirectly connected with Breeding, over Reincarnation. So, Resurrection is a direct derivative of Reincarnation, but an indirect derivative of Breeding:

ADDENDUM:

Assumption 476: Human instincts can be stronger than naturally based instincts. For example, the Muslim inbreeding instinct is stronger than genetic immortality, because it is based on magical thinking in which the individual is reborn by reincarnation (through inbreeding), while with genetic immortality the individual dies.

Assumption 477: Islam (resurrection) will never defeat honor killings (reincarnation), because the inbreeding instinct from Arab and Asian Muslims (reincarnation), though based on magical thinking (inbreeding leads to reincarnation), is nearly identical to the primal sexual instinct of nature: genetic immortality in descendants. This, because both project the afterlife into another body, with breeding as mediator.

But resurrection, which is also based on magical thinking, is not really based on genetic immortality (no breeding). Resurrection and rebirth project the afterlife into one's own body, which is weird and no religious instinct. 

So, Islam (resurrection) is not based on the primal sexual law of nature (Genetic Immortality) and therefore will lose from Inbreeding (Reincarnation), where Inbreeding is in line with Genetic Immortality. Said differently, Inbreeding and Genetic Immortality are Sexual Instincts (Inbreeding is a subset from Genetic Immortality), while Resurrection is no sexual instinct.

Assumption 481: Reincarnation and Resurrection are both forms of magical religion. 

But the difference is Reincarnation has a link with Genetic Immortality (Animal Religion), in which the individual projects his afterlife into another body by breeding. But Resurrection has nothing to do with Genetic Immortality, because the individual

projects the afterlife into his own body, without breeding. In terms of sexual religion this means Resurrection must be seen as an unrealistic phenomenon. It must be qualified as a fake religion, a sexual placebo, which never will replace Sexual Instincts as the Muslim inbreeding drive.

Assumption 561: The function of Human Religion: HR = f(SR).

HR = f(SR) offers the most parsimonious and heuristic religious model in the world, in which Human Religion (HR) is a function of Sexual Religion (SR, breeding). Human Religion is thought to be a function of a weighted combination of inbreeding and outbreeding.

In case of HR = f(SR), we speak of a blue rational function (f) if HR is literally a function of breeding (e.g. cousin marriages). But in case of a magical derivation of HR from SR (Inbreeding) we write a pink f in HR = f(SR). For example, a rational function of inbreeding bends inbreeding into outbreeding to prevent further autosomal recessive
disorders. But irrational or magical functions are further away from breeding and eventually lose any contact with reality. So, reincarnation is a magical (and direct) function of breeding, because we don't know if reincarnation really exists. But still farther away is resurrection, which has nothing to do with the birth process and is a magical but also indirect function of breeding. 

Assumption 582: Magical thinking leads to magical instincts.

Different animals have different instincts related to brain capacity and lifestyle. For example, foxes have more advanced instincts than chickens. Better instincts mean better chances of survival. For humans we will argue that magical thinking also gives better chances of survival.

If we accept that in the animal world past instincts are expelled by more profitable ones, then we must also understand that reincarnation has supplanted 'genetic immortality', which is animal religion in which genes are passed on to posterity, but where individuals die.

Furthermore, in war situations the soul and reincarnation challenge believers to risk taking behavior in the expectation of an afterlife. This gives believers better chances of survival than unbelievers. So, the reincarnation instinct was rightly substituted for genetic immortality, the animal instinct. That's how magical thinking contributes to the survival of the human species. This also means the belief in God will not disappear.

In principle, there is no difference in religion between animals and humans. 

Monotheistic religion is a set of rules to control female sexual behavior:

This is easily seen in Islam. Judaism offers women the greatest freedom and Christianity is somewhere in between. But since this blog is about the sadomasochistic dimension with Islam and Christianity as extremes, we're leaving Judaism out of the equation:

Chimps and bonobos are humans' closest living relatives and their religions are about the same:

In polytheism all sexual roles are empathically recognized in the conscious. Polytheism has SM-dyad (light) for humans, which comes down to Vanilla-dyad for 

Christians and bonobos:

Bonobos are Sodom and Gomorrah. All sexual roles are experienced empathically in the conscious: