.png)
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Resume:
Rebirth, how come?
Assumption 406: 'Rebirth without soul' is just a rational analogy from the life cycle of plants. It is not magical thinking, it is just the wrong analogy. Rebirth has no free will. It does not have a soul in the afterlife, which offers the deceased to reincarnate into the tribe of their choice.
Assumption 386: The difference between rebirth and reincarnation is that in rebirth the own body of flesh and blood revives.
Assumption 404: Rebirth and resurrection.
Rebirth is the complete renewal of the DNA of a dead person into a foetus, complete with long telomeres (Homo naledi). Resurrection is the revival of a dead person in his last appearance (Christianity, Jesus). Islam mixes rebirth (repairing DNA completely) with resurrection (reinstating the last stage) in some parallel universe.
Hominids and hominins
Hominins (humanlike beings) are said to differ from hominids (Australopiths) by human characteristics. But extreme inbred Australopiths as Homo naledi could have got 'human' characteristics as well by convergent evolution. So, maybe we can not prove our characteristics as exclusively hominin:
Maybe bipedality itself was the groundshaking mutation, which gave Australopiths their primitive but rational brain. Later hominins developed an excessive number of nerve cells in their frontal lobe to circumvent reality by magical conclusions, like 'religion'. They invented the soul and reincarnation, what low brain Australopiths probably did not.
Assumption 410: Homo naledi can be called 'a late hominid'. Bipedal hominids survived for seven million years with their vulnerable bodies against feline predators. Without a sharp and rational brain, they would not have survived. From the moment they left the trees they must have used wooden spears to defend themselves. They were not stupid at all, although they must have functioned at a low level of rationality.
In my opinion, being human is not an unmixed blessing. Satisfied with their own fate, humans are like butchers inspecting the quality of their own meat.
Homo naledi can be called 'a late hominid'. Bipedal hominids survived seven million years with their vulnerable bodies against feline predators. Without a sharp and rational brain they would not have survived. From the moment they left the trees they must have used wooden spears to defend themselves.
The Lunate Sulcus by Ralph Holloway
Ralph Holloway is an endocast specialist who studies the inside skull to determine brain development of hominins. He also investigated the skull of Salam (3.3 Ma; 400cc; Ethiopia) and discovered the three years old child's brain was already rewired and different from chimps. The lunate sulcus marking vision structures had moved back on the skull making place for a larger neo cortex. So Salam was already more intelligent than chimps with 400cc brains:
This means bipedality is caused by a mutation that rewired the brain completely. Look how awkward quadruped chimps are still making spears:
Much later - around Homo erectus (2.1 Ma; 900cc) - and due to the proliferation of neural pathways in the frontal lobe, the number of degrees of freedom to circumvent reality has increased enormously. Hominins were now so well armed against predators that they could afford a magical world of thought.
Genetic immortality (animal religion)
Animals accept similarity between offspring and ancestors as coming from genetic immortality (parental genes).
Animals accept similarity between offspring and ancestors as coming from genetic immortality (parental genes).
The first bipedal primates
First bipedal primates are mutated from quadrupeds (kind of chimps) and got a completely rewired brain.
Bipedality was a spin-off from mutation that worked out in a completely different lifestyle. Where quadrupeds were outbreeding cultures, bipeds necessarily developed as inbred populations:
After millions of years Inbreeding and Incest became the first and primal bipedal religion. It is graved into our brains:
Inbreeding is the deeply hidden lust to project the male self-identity into inbred descendants. Inbreeding is a typical male instinct.
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
Outbreeding is the primal law of nature and the basic sexual drive of females. Outbreeding is a typical female instinct:
First Australopiths (7 Ma; 400cc) were rational beings and did not believe in magical things as 'the soul'. They thought rationally and had not yet developed the cauliflower brain of Homo erectus (2.1 Ma; 900cc).
Though they came from the animal world where the difference between 'dead' and 'sleep forever' is fluent, more advanced Australopiths came into conflict with this fluency.
They could draw conclusions that animals were unable to and thought: Dead is dead, also when a dead body is still intact.
But on the other hand, they came into conflict with reality because they perceived how much their offspring looked like the ancestors. A very rational observation.
Therefore, Australopithecus could not wipe out 'sleeping forever' completely.
Somehow ancestors might not be dead at all and return to life into their offspring. So, it were rational impossibilities (coming to life again), which in the long run triggered magical thinking (reincarnation).
Assumption 405: It were rational impossibilities (coming to life again), which in the long run triggered magical thinking (reincarnation and resurrection). Magical thinking replaced genetic immortality from the animal world.
The trail of inbreeding cultures through the evolution
But on the other hand, they came into conflict with reality because they perceived how much their offspring looked like the ancestors. A very rational observation.
Therefore, Australopithecus could not wipe out 'sleeping forever' completely.
Somehow ancestors might not be dead at all and return to life into their offspring. So, it were rational impossibilities (coming to life again), which in the long run triggered magical thinking (reincarnation).
Assumption 405: It were rational impossibilities (coming to life again), which in the long run triggered magical thinking (reincarnation and resurrection). Magical thinking replaced genetic immortality from the animal world.
Later Australopiths (3 Ma; 400cc) thought revival of the dead came from rebirth and much later Homo erectus (2,1 Ma; 900cc) concluded to reincarnation.
What we see is that the bipedal brain caused more and more conflicts by posing more and more insoluble rational questions. And because Homo erectus had no answers, his frontal lobe excelled into magical explanations. Actually he created more and more degrees of freedom to circumvent reality in trying to understand the world.
Of course we could also postulate the human brain grew out of proportion by protein-rich sea food from the coast side. But that would be a specific hypothesis, while approaching the limits of rational thinking is a general cause, though maybe less plausible.
What do we think Australopiths knew?
We think that Australopiths believed life grew out of the soil, out of the ground. Of course, they did not know about photosynthesis by sunlight. They were baffled by what life really was. They never would really understand life.
Assumption 382: Rebirth without soul.
All life comes from the soil, all plants, all fruits come from the ground.
So, also human life must enter the womb of women through the soil. Well, of course, Australopiths knew about sexual cause and effect, but did not understand how everything came to growth and to life. They concluded, it must be the Underworld which is life giving. Bipedal primates saw this happening every day. And deep in the ground - in the Underworld - lived their God of Darkness, the guardian of all life. It is Him who puts the reborn into the womb of women. That's why Homo naledi sought the deepest places for 'rebirth without soul':
But in principle Australopiths were rational thinkers by mutation, just like us. So, they combined all they knew and built the following theory:
Plants:
1) Plants grow out of the soil.
2) Dead plants disappear into the ground again.
3) New life grows best where dead plants became dust.
4) Life is born in total darkness.
5) But life needs light and warmth to grow.
Then they laid the analogy with animal life:
1) Animal life grows out of the soil.
2) Dead animals disappear into the ground again.
3) New life grows best where dead animals became dust.
4) Life is born in total darkness.
5) But life needs light and warmth to grow.
Now this reasoning is flawed, so they had to think better. But first the link to hominids:
Then they linked animal life to bipedal primates:
1) Hominid life grows out of the soil (out of cemeteries into the womb).
2) Dead hominids disappear into the ground again (burials in cemeteries).
3) New life grows best where dead hominids became dust (settlements placed near cemeteries).
4) Life is born in total darkness (burials in the ground or in caves).
5) But life needs light and warmth to grow (So, life must be able to come out of the ground or caves).
Then they straightforwardly came up with this model:
Australopiths (2.3 Ma-236 ka, Homo naledi)
But they had to modify their model, because something important was missing: What power in the ground put life into the world? And so they came upon the God of Darkness:
First Australopiths (7 Ma; 400cc) were pure autistic rational thinkers and did not come on the idea of god, the idea of a Deus ex Machina. They invented no sun god and no god of the underworld. They concluded that ancestors were sleeping forever, though they noticed the similarity between ancestors and descendants.
Later Australopiths (2.3 Ma-236 ka, Homo naledi) used the above rational analogy model. Is it magical thinking? No, it is not. It is just the wrong analogy, the wrong model. But notice, they did not assume a soul or reincarnation, although Homo naledi (236 ka) definitely knew the concept. But he missed the cauliflower brain to convince him.
The difference between rebirth and reincarnation is the soul. The soul personifies free will of the dead in the hereafter, free will to reincarnate into wherever they want. The soul broke the sound barrier to the hominins:
Rebirth, how come?
This all means rebirth without soul is just a rational analogy from the life cycle of plants. It is not magical thinking, it is just the wrong analogy.
Assumption 406: 'Rebirth without soul' is just a rational analogy from the life cycle of plants. It is not magical thinking, it is just the wrong analogy. Rebirth has no free will. It does not have a soul in the afterlife, which offers the deceased to reincarnate into the tribe of their choice.
Assumption 387: If Homo naledi believed in rebirth, then the God of Darkness in Dinaledi Chamber needed no whole dead bodies, for just a tiny piece of flesh and a single bone were sufficient to reconstruct an invisible tiny reborn for the womb of Homo naledi females. It might be that important individuals were buried completely, like Neo.
Assumption 389: Deceased Homo naledi would have been decomposed in a ceremonial way without damaging the bones sent to Dinaledi Chamber.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Assumption 391: Homo Floresiensis did not interbred with other hominin species for millions of years because he was geographically isolated. But Homo naledi remained partly Australopithecus out of free will and was not hindered by geographical barriers. This behavior can only be explained by his inbreeding culture.
Assumption 392: Homo naledi survived for millions of years in an inbreeding culture, apparently sustained by a varied genome. It is proven they were all alike, and probably without autosomal recessive disorders.
Assumption 393: Inbreeding was the primal religion of bipedal primates. Protection of tribal identity caused unwillingness to mix with other hominins and inbreeding became a stabilizer within the evolution tree. Inbreeding has slowed down and obstructed human evolution. On the other hand, outbreeding cultures have accelerated the evolution by combining randomly with whatever hominin on the road.
Assumption 394:
1) Australopithecus probably developed hominin legs for long-distance running, from which evolved Homo erectus. Then, Homo naledi already had hominin legs from the beginning and did not change much from 2.3 Ma to 335 ka ago.
2) But because there is no standard evolution tree, retarded Homo naledi with ape-like legs might have got their hominin legs later in the evolution by mixing with Homo erectus. But Homo erectus might not have been sexually attracted to ape-like lower bodies. Also for other reasons this alternative is rejected.
3) The best hypothesis is that both Homo naledi and Homo erectus had already long legs around 335 ka ago and that Homo erectus was sexually attracted to Homo naledi females. Then our scenario could be successful, because then Homo naledi males had reason to protect their inbreeding culture against Homo erectus, who raped their females, and by preventing ancestors to be reborn into Homo erectus tribes.
Assumption 394: The best hypothesis is that both Homo naledi and Homo erectus had already long legs around 335 ka ago and that Homo erectus was sexually attracted to Homo naledi females. Then our scenario could be successful, because then Homo naledi males had reason to protect their inbreeding culture against Homo erectus, who raped their females, and by preventing ancestors to be reborn into Homo erectus tribes.
Assumption 395: The Dinaledi scenario:
A Homo erectus tribe settled near the inbreeding culture of Homo naledi - 335 ka ago - and formed a threat for attractive Homo naledi females. This triggered an extreme reaction in which Homo naledi developed the Dinaledi protocol to preserve the species.
Assumption 396: Inbred populations are not equal to outbred populations. Inbred populations are missing some characteristics by defective evolution, by insufficient crossing with other populations. Only reasonably mixed outbred populations are directly comparable. This implies no a priori moral judgment. All humans can be morally equivalent, in principle.
Assumption 397: Inbreeding has genetic properties in the first place, from which culture is just a consequence. Inbreeding must be seen as a bipedal primate religious instinct. The problem from Western society is to see Muslim inbreeding as an existential choice rather than a natural lust leading to perpetual orgasm.
Assumption 398: Homo naledi theoretically can have been an extremely inbred population without much contact with modern hominins. But still, they can have developed human characteristics by convergent evolution.
Assumption 399:
Believing in the soul (reincarnation) means that the body is not that important and that the grave is closed with a stone, through which the soul can escape into another person. So, the crucial difference is whether the grave is open or closed. The burial chamber of Dinaledi Chamber was open. Not the soul but the body had to be able to leave the cave. Also, Naledi Chamber and Lesedi Chamber had the entrance as exit. So, Homo naledi knew where reborn left the cave for conception. With the exit under control they prevented their ancestors from getting lost and reborn into Homo erectus tribes.
Assumption 400: The most brilliant contribution of Homo naledi to the evolution theory is that even if Homo erectus raped his females, the God of Darkness nevertheless would put Homo naledi ancestors into their wombs. The problem with this theory is that it can be checked and later on led to the downfall of Homo naledi as a culture.
Assumption 401: Long-term effects from inbreeding are only expected from a physiological and genetic base. Therefore, inbreeding cultures must be based on an enduring instinct. We further assume dilution of the inbreeding instinct by mixing with outbreeding cultures.
Assumption 402: Rebirth or reincarnation caves.
In rebirth caves nothing was given to the dead. In the first place they never saw a baby newborn with a stone axe in his hand. Also, precious gifts would attract thieves, where the chambers were open and not protected. After all, reborn ancestors had to be able to leave the cave. So, rebirth and valuable gifts do not go together. Of course Homo naledi had stone tools, of course they had grass cables but they never left anything of value in the caves. Nobody was allowed to track their rebirth graves.
Assumption 403: The evolution of human religious concepts keeps track with their intellectual development. But more advanced and magical concepts from their cauliflower brain do not supplant rational concepts from the animal world. Interactions occur between 'sleep forever', 'rebirth with and without soul', 'reincarnation' and 'resurrection in the multiverse'. The schizophrenia of Islam is caused by impossible interactions between these concepts, in which Muslims instinctively believe in earthly reincarnation, but are also forced to accept Allah and resurrection into the parallel universe. Notice the similarity between Allah and the God of Darkness.
Assumption 404: Rebirth and resurrection.
Rebirth is the complete renewal of the DNA of a dead person into a foetus, complete with long telomeres (Homo naledi). Resurrection is the revival of a dead person in his last appearance (Christianity, Jesus). Islam mixes rebirth (repairing DNA completely) with resurrection (reinstating the last stage) in some parallel universe.
Assumption 405: It were rational impossibilities (coming to life again), which in the long run triggered magical thinking (reincarnation and resurrection). Magical thinking replaced genetic immortality from the animal world.
Assumption 406: 'Rebirth without soul' is just a rational analogy from the life cycle of plants. It is not magical thinking, it is just the wrong analogy. Rebirth has no free will. It does not have a soul in the afterlife, which offers the deceased to reincarnate into the tribe of their choice.
We think that Australopiths believed life grew out of the soil, out of the ground. Of course, they did not know about photosynthesis by sunlight. They were baffled by what life really was. They never would really understand life.
Assumption 382: Rebirth without soul.
All life comes from the soil, all plants, all fruits come from the ground.
So, also human life must enter the womb of women through the soil. Well, of course, Australopiths knew about sexual cause and effect, but did not understand how everything came to growth and to life. They concluded, it must be the Underworld which is life giving. Bipedal primates saw this happening every day. And deep in the ground - in the Underworld - lived their God of Darkness, the guardian of all life. It is Him who puts the reborn into the womb of women. That's why Homo naledi sought the deepest places for 'rebirth without soul':
But in principle Australopiths were rational thinkers by mutation, just like us. So, they combined all they knew and built the following theory:
Plants:
1) Plants grow out of the soil.
2) Dead plants disappear into the ground again.
3) New life grows best where dead plants became dust.
4) Life is born in total darkness.
5) But life needs light and warmth to grow.
Then they laid the analogy with animal life:
1) Animal life grows out of the soil.
2) Dead animals disappear into the ground again.
3) New life grows best where dead animals became dust.
4) Life is born in total darkness.
5) But life needs light and warmth to grow.
Now this reasoning is flawed, so they had to think better. But first the link to hominids:
Then they linked animal life to bipedal primates:
1) Hominid life grows out of the soil (out of cemeteries into the womb).
2) Dead hominids disappear into the ground again (burials in cemeteries).
3) New life grows best where dead hominids became dust (settlements placed near cemeteries).
4) Life is born in total darkness (burials in the ground or in caves).
5) But life needs light and warmth to grow (So, life must be able to come out of the ground or caves).
Then they straightforwardly came up with this model:
Australopiths (2.3 Ma-236 ka, Homo naledi)
But they had to modify their model, because something important was missing: What power in the ground put life into the world? And so they came upon the God of Darkness:
First Australopiths (7 Ma; 400cc) were pure autistic rational thinkers and did not come on the idea of god, the idea of a Deus ex Machina. They invented no sun god and no god of the underworld. They concluded that ancestors were sleeping forever, though they noticed the similarity between ancestors and descendants.
Later Australopiths (2.3 Ma-236 ka, Homo naledi) used the above rational analogy model. Is it magical thinking? No, it is not. It is just the wrong analogy, the wrong model. But notice, they did not assume a soul or reincarnation, although Homo naledi (236 ka) definitely knew the concept. But he missed the cauliflower brain to convince him.
The difference between rebirth and reincarnation is the soul. The soul personifies free will of the dead in the hereafter, free will to reincarnate into wherever they want. The soul broke the sound barrier to the hominins:
Rebirth, how come?
This all means rebirth without soul is just a rational analogy from the life cycle of plants. It is not magical thinking, it is just the wrong analogy.
Assumption 406: 'Rebirth without soul' is just a rational analogy from the life cycle of plants. It is not magical thinking, it is just the wrong analogy. Rebirth has no free will. It does not have a soul in the afterlife, which offers the deceased to reincarnate into the tribe of their choice.
Assumption 387: If Homo naledi believed in rebirth, then the God of Darkness in Dinaledi Chamber needed no whole dead bodies, for just a tiny piece of flesh and a single bone were sufficient to reconstruct an invisible tiny reborn for the womb of Homo naledi females. It might be that important individuals were buried completely, like Neo.
Assumption 389: Deceased Homo naledi would have been decomposed in a ceremonial way without damaging the bones sent to Dinaledi Chamber.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Human religion is based on a sequence of religious concepts of increasing difficulty, paired with a growing brain complexity in the evolution:
Unconscious scale of religion: Relative weights:
1) Torn to pieces: definitely dead. 14 Ma/14 Ma= 1
2) Intact dead body: sleep forever. 14/14= 1
3) Rebirth without soul. 3/14= 0.2
4) Rebirth with the soul. 2.8/14= 0.2
5) Reincarnation into the earthly universe. 2/14= .14
6) Resurrection in the parallel universe. 0.35/14= .025
7) Resurrection in the multiverse. ---------------
Unconscious scale of religion: Relative weights:
1) Torn to pieces: definitely dead. 14 Ma/14 Ma= 1
2) Intact dead body: sleep forever. 14/14= 1
3) Rebirth without soul. 3/14= 0.2
4) Rebirth with the soul. 2.8/14= 0.2
5) Reincarnation into the earthly universe. 2/14= .14
6) Resurrection in the parallel universe. 0.35/14= .025
7) Resurrection in the multiverse. ---------------
- Second rational rule: Relative weights of concepts.
The power of these religious concepts is based on their moments of entry in the evolution. So, the further back in the evolution the stronger religious concepts. This means 'definitely dead' is the strongest religious concept in our primitive brain, while resurrection in the multiverse is the weakest in our frontal lobe. So, the time scale of religious concepts is the measure of their importance.
- Hereby we gave the general model of human religion a rational base.
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
Assumption 193: The primal law of animal religion is the commandment: thou shalt reproduce in genetic diversity.
Assumption 336: The inbreeding instinct is a human instinct developed somewhere between Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) and the Arabian Peninsula (Homo sapiens, 60-50 ka; 1400cc). It is a typical male instinct which aims at earthly reincarnation into tribal inbred bodies enforced by cousin marriages. It is still vividly present in the Muslim culture. But there must have been an earlier inbreeding instinct aiming at 'rebirth without soul' in relation to Homo naledi.
Assumption 330: Haplo-groups N from L3N and M from L3M, both groups from mtDNA, are sibling-groups what means both might be connected with the inbreeding instinct in nuDNA.
Assumption 328: Cousin marriages are the canary in the coalmine of earthly reincarnation and the inbreeding instinct.
Assumption 381:
The concept of 'rebirth without soul' led within a very short time to insurmountable problems, being self-determination in the afterlife. Homo naledi (2.3 Ma - 2.36 ka) was well aware of this dilemma. Also, Homo erectus (2.12 Ma; 900cc) realized that rebirth or reincarnation needed a soul to be able to choose in what tribe ancestors wanted to be alive again. That is the reason of the soul. Self-determination in the afterlife with retention of self-identity.
Assumption 382: Rebirth without soul.
All life comes from the soil, all plants, all fruits come from the ground. So, also human life must enter the womb of women through the soil. Well, of course, Australopiths knew about sexual cause and effect, but did not understand how everything came to growth and to life. They concluded, it must be the Underworld which is life giving. Bipedal primates saw this happening every day. And deep in the ground - in the Underworld - lived their God of Darkness, the guardian of all life. It is Him who puts the reborn into the womb of women. That's why Homo naledi sought the deepest places for 'rebirth without soul'.
Assumption 383:
Muslim males think it is their own choice to reincarnate into their tribe or family, into their inbred descendants created by cousin marriages. This, because Muslims believe in the soul. But Homo naledi was wiser and wondered if ancestors really would return to their tribe, or that they could be reborn anywhere. Maybe hybrids from Homo erectus would start a new life in the Homo naledi tribe. That would be disastrous, for Homo naledi males hated the handsome Homo erectus males because of sexual competition around naledi females.
Assumption 384: Homo naledi rejected the soul as a joke, only to get a grip on the afterlife after death. Now, it is possible that Homo erectus (2.12 Ma; 900cc) evolved to 'reincarnation with the soul' already two million years ago, while Homo naledi continued to believe in 'rebirth without soul' until 335 ka ago. Since, today, there are still a lot of people not believing in the soul.
Assumption 385: If the crucial humanizer was the bipedal mutation, we expect mathematical rational thinking rudimentary presented in the first bipedal primates, seven million years ago. According to the normal IQ-distribution there must have been super intelligent Australopiths and Homo naledi. Then, we can expect savants - like mathematics genius prodigy Daniel Tammet - also to be represented in the earliest bipedal hominids, as well as mathematics being an integral part of the human brain. Space is mathematics, scientific thinking may be the essence of the bipedal mutation. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6co1kq
Assumption 386: The difference between rebirth and reincarnation is that in rebirth the own body of flesh and blood revives.
Assumption 389: Deceased Homo naledi would have been decomposed in a ceremonial way without damaging the bones sent to Dinaledi Chamber.
Assumption 390: Homo naledi's faith was based on inbreeding, because he enforced ancestors to be reborn into Homo naledi wombs. The religion of Homo erectus probably was based on outbreeding, because he chased the females from Homo naledi. (Circular reasoning).
The power of these religious concepts is based on their moments of entry in the evolution. So, the further back in the evolution the stronger religious concepts. This means 'definitely dead' is the strongest religious concept in our primitive brain, while resurrection in the multiverse is the weakest in our frontal lobe. So, the time scale of religious concepts is the measure of their importance.
- Hereby we gave the general model of human religion a rational base.
Assumption 338: The inbreeding instinct is no joke, since we also have the outcrossing instinct as primal sexual law of nature. So, if Muslims want to compete outbreeding, they should replace it with the stronger instinct of inbreeding.
Assumption 193: The primal law of animal religion is the commandment: thou shalt reproduce in genetic diversity.
Assumption 336: The inbreeding instinct is a human instinct developed somewhere between Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) and the Arabian Peninsula (Homo sapiens, 60-50 ka; 1400cc). It is a typical male instinct which aims at earthly reincarnation into tribal inbred bodies enforced by cousin marriages. It is still vividly present in the Muslim culture. But there must have been an earlier inbreeding instinct aiming at 'rebirth without soul' in relation to Homo naledi.
Assumption 330: Haplo-groups N from L3N and M from L3M, both groups from mtDNA, are sibling-groups what means both might be connected with the inbreeding instinct in nuDNA.
Assumption 328: Cousin marriages are the canary in the coalmine of earthly reincarnation and the inbreeding instinct.
Assumption 381:
The concept of 'rebirth without soul' led within a very short time to insurmountable problems, being self-determination in the afterlife. Homo naledi (2.3 Ma - 2.36 ka) was well aware of this dilemma. Also, Homo erectus (2.12 Ma; 900cc) realized that rebirth or reincarnation needed a soul to be able to choose in what tribe ancestors wanted to be alive again. That is the reason of the soul. Self-determination in the afterlife with retention of self-identity.
Assumption 382: Rebirth without soul.
All life comes from the soil, all plants, all fruits come from the ground. So, also human life must enter the womb of women through the soil. Well, of course, Australopiths knew about sexual cause and effect, but did not understand how everything came to growth and to life. They concluded, it must be the Underworld which is life giving. Bipedal primates saw this happening every day. And deep in the ground - in the Underworld - lived their God of Darkness, the guardian of all life. It is Him who puts the reborn into the womb of women. That's why Homo naledi sought the deepest places for 'rebirth without soul'.
Assumption 383:
Muslim males think it is their own choice to reincarnate into their tribe or family, into their inbred descendants created by cousin marriages. This, because Muslims believe in the soul. But Homo naledi was wiser and wondered if ancestors really would return to their tribe, or that they could be reborn anywhere. Maybe hybrids from Homo erectus would start a new life in the Homo naledi tribe. That would be disastrous, for Homo naledi males hated the handsome Homo erectus males because of sexual competition around naledi females.
Assumption 384: Homo naledi rejected the soul as a joke, only to get a grip on the afterlife after death. Now, it is possible that Homo erectus (2.12 Ma; 900cc) evolved to 'reincarnation with the soul' already two million years ago, while Homo naledi continued to believe in 'rebirth without soul' until 335 ka ago. Since, today, there are still a lot of people not believing in the soul.
Assumption 385: If the crucial humanizer was the bipedal mutation, we expect mathematical rational thinking rudimentary presented in the first bipedal primates, seven million years ago. According to the normal IQ-distribution there must have been super intelligent Australopiths and Homo naledi. Then, we can expect savants - like mathematics genius prodigy Daniel Tammet - also to be represented in the earliest bipedal hominids, as well as mathematics being an integral part of the human brain. Space is mathematics, scientific thinking may be the essence of the bipedal mutation. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6co1kq
Assumption 386: The difference between rebirth and reincarnation is that in rebirth the own body of flesh and blood revives.
Assumption 387: If Homo naledi believed in rebirth, then the God of Darkness in Dinaledi Chamber needed no whole dead bodies, for just a tiny piece of flesh and a single bone were sufficient to reconstruct an invisible tiny reborn for the womb of Homo naledi females. It might be that important individuals were buried completely, like Neo.
Assumption 388: With reincarnation (with a soul) and even more with Islamic resurrection in the parallel universe, integral bodies must be buried if possible.
Assumption 389: Deceased Homo naledi would have been decomposed in a ceremonial way without damaging the bones sent to Dinaledi Chamber.
Assumption 390: Homo naledi's faith was based on inbreeding, because he enforced ancestors to be reborn into Homo naledi wombs. The religion of Homo erectus probably was based on outbreeding, because he chased the females from Homo naledi. (Circular reasoning).
Assumption 391: Homo Floresiensis did not interbred with other hominin species for millions of years because he was geographically isolated. But Homo naledi remained partly Australopithecus out of free will and was not hindered by geographical barriers. This behavior can only be explained by his inbreeding culture.
Assumption 392: Homo naledi survived for millions of years in an inbreeding culture, apparently sustained by a varied genome. It is proven they were all alike, and probably without autosomal recessive disorders.
Assumption 393: Inbreeding was the primal religion of bipedal primates. Protection of tribal identity caused unwillingness to mix with other hominins and inbreeding became a stabilizer within the evolution tree. Inbreeding has slowed down and obstructed human evolution. On the other hand, outbreeding cultures have accelerated the evolution by combining randomly with whatever hominin on the road.
Assumption 394:
1) Australopithecus probably developed hominin legs for long-distance running, from which evolved Homo erectus. Then, Homo naledi already had hominin legs from the beginning and did not change much from 2.3 Ma to 335 ka ago.
2) But because there is no standard evolution tree, retarded Homo naledi with ape-like legs might have got their hominin legs later in the evolution by mixing with Homo erectus. But Homo erectus might not have been sexually attracted to ape-like lower bodies. Also for other reasons this alternative is rejected.
3) The best hypothesis is that both Homo naledi and Homo erectus had already long legs around 335 ka ago and that Homo erectus was sexually attracted to Homo naledi females. Then our scenario could be successful, because then Homo naledi males had reason to protect their inbreeding culture against Homo erectus, who raped their females, and by preventing ancestors to be reborn into Homo erectus tribes.
Assumption 394: The best hypothesis is that both Homo naledi and Homo erectus had already long legs around 335 ka ago and that Homo erectus was sexually attracted to Homo naledi females. Then our scenario could be successful, because then Homo naledi males had reason to protect their inbreeding culture against Homo erectus, who raped their females, and by preventing ancestors to be reborn into Homo erectus tribes.
Assumption 395: The Dinaledi scenario:
A Homo erectus tribe settled near the inbreeding culture of Homo naledi - 335 ka ago - and formed a threat for attractive Homo naledi females. This triggered an extreme reaction in which Homo naledi developed the Dinaledi protocol to preserve the species.
Assumption 396: Inbred populations are not equal to outbred populations. Inbred populations are missing some characteristics by defective evolution, by insufficient crossing with other populations. Only reasonably mixed outbred populations are directly comparable. This implies no a priori moral judgment. All humans can be morally equivalent, in principle.
Assumption 397: Inbreeding has genetic properties in the first place, from which culture is just a consequence. Inbreeding must be seen as a bipedal primate religious instinct. The problem from Western society is to see Muslim inbreeding as an existential choice rather than a natural lust leading to perpetual orgasm.
Assumption 398: Homo naledi theoretically can have been an extremely inbred population without much contact with modern hominins. But still, they can have developed human characteristics by convergent evolution.
Assumption 399:
Believing in the soul (reincarnation) means that the body is not that important and that the grave is closed with a stone, through which the soul can escape into another person. So, the crucial difference is whether the grave is open or closed. The burial chamber of Dinaledi Chamber was open. Not the soul but the body had to be able to leave the cave. Also, Naledi Chamber and Lesedi Chamber had the entrance as exit. So, Homo naledi knew where reborn left the cave for conception. With the exit under control they prevented their ancestors from getting lost and reborn into Homo erectus tribes.
Assumption 400: The most brilliant contribution of Homo naledi to the evolution theory is that even if Homo erectus raped his females, the God of Darkness nevertheless would put Homo naledi ancestors into their wombs. The problem with this theory is that it can be checked and later on led to the downfall of Homo naledi as a culture.
Assumption 401: Long-term effects from inbreeding are only expected from a physiological and genetic base. Therefore, inbreeding cultures must be based on an enduring instinct. We further assume dilution of the inbreeding instinct by mixing with outbreeding cultures.
Assumption 402: Rebirth or reincarnation caves.
In rebirth caves nothing was given to the dead. In the first place they never saw a baby newborn with a stone axe in his hand. Also, precious gifts would attract thieves, where the chambers were open and not protected. After all, reborn ancestors had to be able to leave the cave. So, rebirth and valuable gifts do not go together. Of course Homo naledi had stone tools, of course they had grass cables but they never left anything of value in the caves. Nobody was allowed to track their rebirth graves.
Assumption 403: The evolution of human religious concepts keeps track with their intellectual development. But more advanced and magical concepts from their cauliflower brain do not supplant rational concepts from the animal world. Interactions occur between 'sleep forever', 'rebirth with and without soul', 'reincarnation' and 'resurrection in the multiverse'. The schizophrenia of Islam is caused by impossible interactions between these concepts, in which Muslims instinctively believe in earthly reincarnation, but are also forced to accept Allah and resurrection into the parallel universe. Notice the similarity between Allah and the God of Darkness.
Assumption 404: Rebirth and resurrection.
Rebirth is the complete renewal of the DNA of a dead person into a foetus, complete with long telomeres (Homo naledi). Resurrection is the revival of a dead person in his last appearance (Christianity, Jesus). Islam mixes rebirth (repairing DNA completely) with resurrection (reinstating the last stage) in some parallel universe.
Assumption 406: 'Rebirth without soul' is just a rational analogy from the life cycle of plants. It is not magical thinking, it is just the wrong analogy. Rebirth has no free will. It does not have a soul in the afterlife, which offers the deceased to reincarnate into the tribe of their choice.
.jpg){kind=small}
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
.jpg){kind=small}