Thursday 9 October 2014

(11) The Fundamental Equation in Human Religion


Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive





Schematic development human religion:

















The search for God [a (SEX)]

a (SEX)

Coefficient a times SEX.


Assumption 4: Religion is a form of sexuality




Inbreeding and incest and genetic immortality belong to the sexual domain. In fact it is our opinion that inbreeding and incest is the core of human religion.
  
Reincarnation is a part of magical thinking and does not belong to sexuality.
Hence human religion is divided over the sexual and the magical domain:





For clarity, we separated inbreeding from sexuality and only processed interactions between inbreeding and reincarnation:







The search for God [a (SEX)]

In our view, human religion is the search for God and the yearning to eternal life. According to the Sexual Theory of Religion, the search for God is a genetic assignment for every male animal. 

It is caused by an inherited physiological trace in the brain, which forces males to realize a sexual ideal projection in the Alpha male. Hence, God is a sexual dream to fulfill. But of course societies enforce young boys timely a cultural projection to prevent sexual derailment:





   




After completing early childhood and starting puberty and abstract reasoning, the critical period for the installation of God has been finished. Therefore, the first question of religion has been fulfilled and it cannot be changed.




Magical interactions [INB*ER*PR]

It is our opinion that the more magical interactions a religion needs, the more psychotic and psychopathic it will be:

Assumption 173: Derailed religions are caused by unexplained
magical interactions between abstractions of eternal life.






The search for eternal life [INB*ER*PR]

The second command is not of animal nature. Man now deliberately is hunting for eternal life. And that's what truly motivates people. Therefore, human models of religion should not be about gods but about modes of eternal survival.






Concepts of immortality are bounded by human capacity to form abstractions, what means that intellectual progress is the main determinant in the evolution of human religion. The evolution of Homininae and later humans is constrained by the difficulties of underlying abstractions of eternal life. We found three forms of increasing abstraction in eternal life:

  A: Genetic immortality by inbreeding and incest (Homininae, 9 mya)
  B: Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe (H. erect. + later Homin., 3 mya)
  C: Reincarnation into the parallel universe (Homo sapiens, 200.000 ya)









Earlier we showed that forms of immortality act like reinforcing stimuli for operant responses:

Assumption 143: Operant conditioning: 
Human inbreeding developed as an operant response followed by a reinforcing stimulus of genetic immortality in the (earthly) universe.

Inbreeding and incest are two sides of the same coin and are beneficial for the tribe (inbreeding) and for male tribal members (incest). For example inbreeding led to genetic tribal immortality and incest to perpetual orgasm across generations (with daughters and granddaughters):




Problems arose with the discovery of reincarnation by Homo erectus. Though genetic immortality is the natural and primary reinforcer of inbreeding, man still died as an individual. Therefore reincarnation became a far better secondary reinforcer because men got eternal life. Inbreeding served no longer for the genetic mirror of man in his offspring, but endogamy had to produce the inbred bodies for reincarnation. 






This is also the explanation for honor killings and acid attacks:





Assumption 144: Secondary reinforcement:
In primary religion, human inbreeding developed as an operant response followed by a reinforcing stimulus (of the expectation) of reincarnation into the (earthly) universeEarthly reincarnation is the prevailing instinctive reward for inbreeding:

Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe.


Of course the connection between inbreeding and reincarnation is pure nonsense. It depends on magical thinkingBut even if one starts with magical premises one still can develop
some logic in it:


Assumption 153: With the invention of earthly reincarnation inbreeding lost its rational connection with genetic immortality and now became magically bound to earthly reincarnation. And in a way it still made sense. Males could only reincarnate safely into their own tribe if they enforced inbreeding on women during lifetime. Hence, inbreeding was not meant for immortality of their genes any longer, but instead inbred bodies served for reincarnation. And this latter relation became the principal connection in the inbreeding instinct, because it was the best reinforcer of inbreeding.


Islamic confusion [INB*ER*PR]







This is where things went wrong in Islam. Our hypothesis is that in the evolution of mankind inbreeding has formed an instinct with earthly reincarnation. This, because the latter is the best reinforcer of inbreeding and incest ever. Within endogamic cultures the inbreeding instinct is in operation for about 2 to 3 million years and will only disappear by outcrossing. That's our hypothesis:


Assumption 163: Muslims lose their inbreeding and incest instinct alone by outcrossing with non-Muslim populations. Only then they might assimilate into exogamous cultures as Western society. 

Monotheism tried to integrate the numerous tribes of Paradise culture into one ethnic and religious group to form a massive army. Hence Islam tried to break absolute power of tribal heads by forbidding earthly reincarnation what was replaced by reincarnation into the parallel universe

Assumption 168: Islam forbade reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. Hence, eternal orgasm in tribal afterlife was excluded. Not prohibited was inbreeding and perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe.






Muslim males were no longer allowed to worship themselves as tribal gods in the earthly afterlife with eternal orgasm with their descendants. Allah in the parallel universe is the only acceptable God and every Muslim male who projects himself as a God in eternal earthly life, commits a mortal sin and is punishable by death. And above all, Allah became an immanent God who was inspecting Muslim males' minds and that's why they hided there lust for earthly revival and perpetual orgasm in their collective unconscious. Because how could Allah know what they suppressed by themselves?


Assumption 164: The key to understanding Islamic culture is that Allah should be seen as an overall sexual ideal projection of Muslim males, as a reincarnated tribal god with perpetual orgasm in the afterlife.

We conclude that suppression of earthly reincarnation into the unconscious is the main cause of the derailment of Islamic religion:





Islamic monotheistic sexual dictatorship exploited the potential tension between the tribal heritage in the collective unconscious of Muslim males in the ID and the morality of Allah in the SUPER EGO of the conscious:


Assumption 162Religious indoctrination in Islamic culture expresses the struggle
of the parallel universe of Allah in the conscious, with the earthly universe of tribal gods in the unconscious.





Assumption 117: Islam prevents the fusion of Tribal gods with Allah, by which Paradise Culture and Islam are optimally separated. Despotism determines the ideal time to unify both powers under pressure with the battle cry of ‘Allahu Akbar’, after which the SM-Dyad with other sexual roles, breaks apart in murder and sexual lust.





Now without further ado we offer an absurd scenario from (8) Honor Killing Scenarios, where these entire not understood interactions lead to the murder of a dearly loved child:



The killer who loves his daughter dearly

- Now, because of his unknown wish to reincarnate in the (earthly) universe, the father puts pressure on his daughter to inbreed with her cousin for 'the honor of the family'. The latter is because he does not know how to connect inbreeding with Allah in the parallel universe.






OR = operant response (trying an action)
PR = positive reinforcement (accepted in the family again, reincarnation)
NR = negative reinforcement (stops raping daughter)
PP = positive punishment (raping or killing victim)
NP = negative punishment (removing safety daughter by threatening her life)


Refusal arranged marriage:

Father [OR: Inbreeding daughter ==> PR: Honor of the family: staying together]
Father [OR: Inbreeding daughter ==> PR: Reincarnation into the parallel universe]
Father [OR: Inbreeding daughter ==> PR: Reincarnation into the earthly universe]


The father consciously wants to come into heaven of the parallel universe. But inbreeding has no logical link with the parallel universe. Unconsciously he strives to reincarnation into the earthly universe. But there is no natural relation between inbreeding and reincarnation at all. What means that all his motives are in fact pure nonsense. And 'the honor of the family' is a rehash of what really matters: his self-projection as a tribal god in the afterlife. He is the result of an interaction of religious indoctrination and an inbred population.
We concluded earlier that Muslim fathers are not allowed to worship themselves as tribal gods and to believe in earthly reincarnation. That’s why inbreeding is not propagated in the Koran.



Cognitive dissonance between conscious and unconscious

Muslims suppress their intense desire for reincarnation into the (earthly) universe since 1400 years. Polytheism (tribal gods and idols) are forbidden on pain of death. Now, how would Allah possibly know of this hidden drive, where Muslims don’t even know by themselves consciously? 

In the present scenario, conflicts are created in the conscious of the Muslim male, but the whole conflict of dissonance can easily be transferred to the unconscious. Then the father 'knows nothing' about it:





Immanent Allah sees everything. But only when Muslims themselves realize the reason of their inbreeding instinct (earthly reincarnation), they will come into panic. That’s the theory.

Now we found the critical turning point in honor killings. That’s when the father realizes that inbreeding has to do with his deepest wish for reincarnation into the (earthly) universe.
Then he understands that the immanent Allah has seen and heard everything. Then he is ashamed of his mortal sin and thinks he might burn in hell for ever. He must do penance to avoid hell and yet earn his virgins in heaven.

From that moment he will panic in a transient psychosis and work on a plan for the gruesome killing of his own daughter.





If the theory is right it is here that women must be warned. They must never argue with their father and pierce the real reason for inbreeding into his mind. Cognitive dissonance can arise immediately. Fathers might panic and get a nervous breakdown. They may collapse in a transient psychosis and kill their daughters.

Therefore cognitive dissonance is a contradiction of interests, of the unconscious earthly reincarnation as a tribal god and the conscious parallel reincarnation into heaven of Allah, a contrast between Paradise culture in the unconscious and secondary Islam in the conscious.






It is not necessary that girls understand the real reason for inbreeding by themselves. Constantly arguing is sufficient to alert their fathers.

Daughter [OR: Constantly arguing ==> PR: Father panics and insecure] 
Father [OR: silent, thinks about killing ==> PR: Daughter determined, agressive]

Further advice is to leave parental home at the first discussion about arranged marriages, certainly before the first wedding proposal. Never argue with your father about forced marriages, do not alert him. And never come home again "to make it right"(Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim.)

And never admit also a committed abortion. Fathers may unconsciously think that a tribal ancestor has been reincarnated in the aborted foetus. He possibly takes revenge.
Gülsüm Selim and Mirjam Abarkan have been killed within weeks after their confession of an abortion.



The more I love my daughter the more gruesome her killing





Immanent Allah sees everything and perceives the sinister motives of the father. Reincarnation into the universe is a mortal sin. The father has sinned. Now Allah must be very angry, where upon the father calculates his chances on eternal life. He already can forget earthly reincarnation with this unwilling daughter, but now he must fear also losing heaven in the parallel universeHe must do penance for Allah to come into heaven anyway. Without penance he would burn in hell forever.


Assumption 111An honor killing can be seen as a human sacrifice, by which the father desperately confirms his belief in the parallel universe of Allah. By killing his daughter he makes earthly reincarnation impossible.

Note that a sinister moment of 'calm before the storm' occurs, where the daughter thinks that her father has abandoned the idea of the arranged marriage. This is seen correctly because he has realized that he must kill his daughter in the name of Allah. After some period of silence he will set a trap and invite her to restore family tiesThis fatal moment occurred in the cases of Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim.

Daughter [OR: Escapes from home ==> PR: removes quarrels with her father] 
Father [OR: silent, thinks about killing ==> PR: Daughter thinks the crisis is over]

Now because he loves his daughter dearly the penance must look real. He cannot strangle her with a pillow because then she would not be hurt. That’s no penance. Then yet he will burn in hellNo, it is he who must feel and show real suffering. 
Hence the more he loves her, the more violent the kill must be. Of course his beloved daughter must show also sincere sufferingSo he thinks he has to slaughter her in the most brutal and gruesome way.


Father [OR: invites daughter home again ==> PR: Daughter thrilled with joy]
Father [OR: Slaughters his daughter gruesome ==> NR: Comes in Heaven again]


Correcting cognitive dissonance







Now, after having paid the highest price on earth that a loving father can pay, he corrected for cognitive dissonance and certainly will deserve the kingdom of heaven.

This is a crazy theory? Yes, it is, but millions of honor killings in history ask for crazy theories. In this theory we correlated father love with degree of violence. The more intense the love for his daughter, the more gruesome her killing must be.





We think that those killers do not have a heart. But we can be wrong. Cognitive dissonance could be an intervening variable, installed by Islamic culture. Hence, we need also to develop a working model for Muslim fathers with a huge bond with their daughters. This all means that already in pre-puberty relations between daughters and fathers should be loosened. Obscene interest in the reproductive organs of daughters must be punished with immediate eviction from home of the daughter, by law and by force.


Assumption 161: Addressing honor killings.

4. Honor killings arise from the over-identification of fathers with their 
daughters, who they regard as possessions. It is the sublimation of the forbidden incest instinct. They do not see them as subjects but as objects, as extensions of themselves, as ribs, so to speak. Therefore fathers develop a morbid self-projection in their daughters out in suffocating control over their behavior. It is a form of stalking. Honor killings are promoted by an overly close relationship between fathers and daughters at puberty. The relaxation of sick relationships between fathers and daughters in pre-puberty is a prerequisite to preventing honor killings.

7. Western psychologists should not try to improve bad relations between Muslim girls and their parents at puberty. Young women perceiving the morbid interest of fathers in their reproductive system must be taken away from home immediately. The bond between fathers and daughters must be broken by law forcefully. 




cc-by-nc-sa







This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment