Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Well, Islam and Christianity are the major religions in the world. Does this mean they are invincible and stay forever? Not according to this blog. They are on the verge of extinction, since both are in heavy conflict with the Sexual Theory of Religion.
Islam blocks genetic diversity for females and Christianity lost its religious heart, its doctrine:
Assumption 207: In a healthy group, there exists a tension between the endogamous core and the exogamous mantle. If one of them is missing the culture must be sick. Seen in evolutionary perspective, Western culture lacks its endogamous heart and Islamic culture has no exogamous mantle, hence both must be regarded as religious cultures on the verge of extinction.
Assumption 210: Islam and Christianity are the endogamous core and exogamous mantle of Homininae groups. Together they form the sadomasochistic dimension, renamed as monotheism in religion. As in a big bang, they drifted apart and in a big crunch, they will destroy each other. By divine judgment of Sexual Scales of Religion sadomasochism will dissolve in murder lust and sexual desire.
Furthermore, both are paraphilic (sado-masochistic) antagonistic sexual deviations
around Judaism, which will merge into CHRISLAM, what will mark the end of Western civilization:
The question is whether this tragic faith of Christianity has a cultural cause (Enlightenment, Romanticism and Marxist nihilism) or does this happen also with Panini:
Is human religion really different from animal sexuality? And if so, for what reason?
We know the answer: the unlimited Hominin male hunger to perpetual orgasm must be the cause:
It is this human trait which distinguishes Hominini from Panini in the first place. But it is more complicated since bonobos have exactly the same insatiable sexual lust:
Which chimps do not have:
Without the urgent need for perpetual orgasm, would chimps take over bonobo females and kill the males? Or would both groups simply exchange fresh juvenile females as is usual among their own groups? That's the question, if they still can procreate genetically...
Well, chimps are simply not interested in sex, it are animal Panini. But bonobos are crazy of sex, they are humanlike Panini. Chimps will kill bonobos only for food, for fiber foods...
Our answer for the downfall of Christianity lies somewhere else: Hominin matriachates (Christianity) are simply indefensible against horny patriachates (Islam) chasing perpetual orgasm, and that's the right analysis for Hominins. Further complication is both 'religions' are paraphilic sexual deviations (sadomasochism, pedophilia etc, etc.) without knowing.
Notice chimps cannot swim across the Congo river to kill the bonobos. Muslims cannot swim either but are transported into Europe by Frontex.
Time after time chasing perpetual orgasm is the most sickening feature of Hominins.
Chimpanzees and bonobos
Chimpanzees and bonobos descended from the Homininae but did not leave the forests for the savannas. This kind of Hominids lived in trees and did not roam from one place to another (though nowadays bonobos do). They would remain animals while wanderers would become Hominins. The latter migrated all over the world while Panini stayed in the forests.
Nowadays chimps and bonobos
http://news.sciencemag.org/plants-animals/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives
'Today, bonobos are found in only the Democratic Republic of Congo and there is no evidence that they have interbred with chimpanzees in equatorial Africa since they diverged, perhaps because the Congo River acted as a barrier to prevent the groups from mixing'.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/3/l_073_03.html
'Why, then, have chimps not evolved this social structure? The answer may lie in the history of the habitats they occupy. Both species of primates live in tropical forests along the Zaire River -- chimps north of the river, bonobos to the south. Their environments seem to be quite similar today. But about 2.5 million years ago, there seems to have been a lengthy drought in southern Zaire that wiped out the preferred food plants of gorillas and sent the primates packing. After the drought ended, the forests returned, but the gorillas did not.[bonobos nowadays are without gorillas.]'
'Chimpanzees [nowadays bonobos] in this environment south of the river had the forest to themselves, and could exploit the fiber foods that had previously been eaten by gorillas -- foods that are still eaten by gorillas to the north [chimps nowadays with gorillas], this additional food to tide them [bonobos] over between fruit trees, they could travel in larger, more stable parties, and form strong social bonds. They became bonobos.'
'On the north side of the river, the (nowadays) chimps had to share their niche with gorillas, which eat the fiber foods. The chimps have to compete for fruit, and occasionally meat, food resources that tend to be widely scattered. Female chimps disperse into the forest with their infants to find enough to eat, and cannot spend time together to forge strong bonds. The changes in social behavior that occurred in response to this environmental factor may be what led chimps down a different evolutionary path, toward a society more prone to violence.'
Nowadays bonobos travel all the year from fruit place to fruit place. Meanwhile they eat fiber foods. They are intellectually very flexible and developed great capability for empathy, as Christians. But chimpanzees are prisoners of little areas and are unable to roam through the forests north of Congo River, as Muslims trapped in the desert. Females do not communicate well what leads to spiritual poverty, to a lack of empathy and to sexual monocultures of chimp males in the last million years. Although, male kin binding is normal for primate groups.
Because the Congo River is a barrier between chimps and bonobos, they did not merge for a million years, and meanwhile they have got another faith (sexual roles) or got other genes, causing very different sexual habits.
Without the Congo River and without the disappearance of Gorillas from the bonobo area, both subspecies probably would not have differed genetically.
But nowadays chimps and bonobos probably will not assimilate because of genetically very different psychological traits in their populations. Chimps would be seen as real psychopaths and bonobos as empathic humans. In about the same way, Islamic society forms cultural psychopaths (paraphilia: sadism, pedophilia etc, etc.), while a terrible cocktail of psychopathic traits is selected for already 7 million years. Muslims can procreate with non-Muslims but they will never assimilate without denying their religion:
It might be bonobos would be massacred by chimps as they could cross the Congo River, for fiber foods...
http://listverse.com/2012/02/14/10-comparisons-between-chimps-and-humans/
Bonobos are renown for their sexual appetite. Common chimpanzees can become angry or violent, but bonobos defuse any such situation through sexual pleasure. They also greet and show affection to each other through sexual stimulation. Common chimpanzees do not engage in recreational sex, and mating only takes ten or fifteen seconds, often whilst eating or doing something else. Friendships and emotional attachments have no bearing on with whom a common chimpanzee mates, and a female in heat will generally mate with several males, who sometimes patiently wait their turn directly after each other. Humans experience sexual pleasure, like bonobos, however even sex for reproduction only takes much longer and requires more effort; long-term partnerships naturally form as a result. Unlike humans, chimpanzees have no concept of sexual jealousy or competition, as they do not take long-term partners.
=====================
Next, we will compare Hominini with Panini and especially Muslims with chimps and Christians with bonobos:
Remember, Chimp males are not free and might be killed on leaving the group. Although it is known two brothers were ever allowed to join another group:
.jpg)
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Well, Islam and Christianity are the major religions in the world. Does this mean they are invincible and stay forever? Not according to this blog. They are on the verge of extinction, since both are in heavy conflict with the Sexual Theory of Religion.
Islam blocks genetic diversity for females and Christianity lost its religious heart, its doctrine:
Assumption 207: In a healthy group, there exists a tension between the endogamous core and the exogamous mantle. If one of them is missing the culture must be sick. Seen in evolutionary perspective, Western culture lacks its endogamous heart and Islamic culture has no exogamous mantle, hence both must be regarded as religious cultures on the verge of extinction.
Assumption 210: Islam and Christianity are the endogamous core and exogamous mantle of Homininae groups. Together they form the sadomasochistic dimension, renamed as monotheism in religion. As in a big bang, they drifted apart and in a big crunch, they will destroy each other. By divine judgment of Sexual Scales of Religion sadomasochism will dissolve in murder lust and sexual desire.
 |
| Only Judaism will survive |
Furthermore, both are paraphilic (sado-masochistic) antagonistic sexual deviations
around Judaism, which will merge into CHRISLAM, what will mark the end of Western civilization:
The question is whether this tragic faith of Christianity has a cultural cause (Enlightenment, Romanticism and Marxist nihilism) or does this happen also with Panini:
We know the answer: the unlimited Hominin male hunger to perpetual orgasm must be the cause:
It is this human trait which distinguishes Hominini from Panini in the first place. But it is more complicated since bonobos have exactly the same insatiable sexual lust:
Which chimps do not have:
Without the urgent need for perpetual orgasm, would chimps take over bonobo females and kill the males? Or would both groups simply exchange fresh juvenile females as is usual among their own groups? That's the question, if they still can procreate genetically...
Well, chimps are simply not interested in sex, it are animal Panini. But bonobos are crazy of sex, they are humanlike Panini. Chimps will kill bonobos only for food, for fiber foods...
Our answer for the downfall of Christianity lies somewhere else: Hominin matriachates (Christianity) are simply indefensible against horny patriachates (Islam) chasing perpetual orgasm, and that's the right analysis for Hominins. Further complication is both 'religions' are paraphilic sexual deviations (sadomasochism, pedophilia etc, etc.) without knowing.
Notice chimps cannot swim across the Congo river to kill the bonobos. Muslims cannot swim either but are transported into Europe by Frontex.
Time after time chasing perpetual orgasm is the most sickening feature of Hominins.
Chimpanzees and bonobos
Chimpanzees and bonobos descended from the Homininae but did not leave the forests for the savannas. This kind of Hominids lived in trees and did not roam from one place to another (though nowadays bonobos do). They would remain animals while wanderers would become Hominins. The latter migrated all over the world while Panini stayed in the forests.
Nowadays chimps and bonobos
http://news.sciencemag.org/plants-animals/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives
'Today, bonobos are found in only the Democratic Republic of Congo and there is no evidence that they have interbred with chimpanzees in equatorial Africa since they diverged, perhaps because the Congo River acted as a barrier to prevent the groups from mixing'.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/3/l_073_03.html
'Why, then, have chimps not evolved this social structure? The answer may lie in the history of the habitats they occupy. Both species of primates live in tropical forests along the Zaire River -- chimps north of the river, bonobos to the south. Their environments seem to be quite similar today. But about 2.5 million years ago, there seems to have been a lengthy drought in southern Zaire that wiped out the preferred food plants of gorillas and sent the primates packing. After the drought ended, the forests returned, but the gorillas did not.[bonobos nowadays are without gorillas.]'
'Chimpanzees [nowadays bonobos] in this environment south of the river had the forest to themselves, and could exploit the fiber foods that had previously been eaten by gorillas -- foods that are still eaten by gorillas to the north [chimps nowadays with gorillas], this additional food to tide them [bonobos] over between fruit trees, they could travel in larger, more stable parties, and form strong social bonds. They became bonobos.'
'On the north side of the river, the (nowadays) chimps had to share their niche with gorillas, which eat the fiber foods. The chimps have to compete for fruit, and occasionally meat, food resources that tend to be widely scattered. Female chimps disperse into the forest with their infants to find enough to eat, and cannot spend time together to forge strong bonds. The changes in social behavior that occurred in response to this environmental factor may be what led chimps down a different evolutionary path, toward a society more prone to violence.'
Nowadays bonobos travel all the year from fruit place to fruit place. Meanwhile they eat fiber foods. They are intellectually very flexible and developed great capability for empathy, as Christians. But chimpanzees are prisoners of little areas and are unable to roam through the forests north of Congo River, as Muslims trapped in the desert. Females do not communicate well what leads to spiritual poverty, to a lack of empathy and to sexual monocultures of chimp males in the last million years. Although, male kin binding is normal for primate groups.
Remember the difference between hominids (20 mya; 300cc) and hominins (4 mya; 400cc). The first rigidly stayed on one place in the forest while the second roamed through the savannas of Africa. Compare the religion of chimps with that of bonobos. Conclude, a change of habitat has led to a change in sexual culture, from which religion is concluded from the first order time derivative of sexual culture. Chimps did not alter in the evolution, but bonobos did. But bonobos did not adhere to the inbreeding and incest culture. On the contrary they right away evolved much farther than homo sapiens and bypassed Christians on Vanilla-dyad. Bonobos practice perpetual orgasm in this lifetime and in this universe in a very friendly way: Vanilla-dyad.
Because the Congo River is a barrier between chimps and bonobos, they did not merge for a million years, and meanwhile they have got another faith (sexual roles) or got other genes, causing very different sexual habits.
Without the Congo River and without the disappearance of Gorillas from the bonobo area, both subspecies probably would not have differed genetically.
But nowadays chimps and bonobos probably will not assimilate because of genetically very different psychological traits in their populations. Chimps would be seen as real psychopaths and bonobos as empathic humans. In about the same way, Islamic society forms cultural psychopaths (paraphilia: sadism, pedophilia etc, etc.), while a terrible cocktail of psychopathic traits is selected for already 7 million years. Muslims can procreate with non-Muslims but they will never assimilate without denying their religion:
It might be bonobos would be massacred by chimps as they could cross the Congo River, for fiber foods...
http://listverse.com/2012/02/14/10-comparisons-between-chimps-and-humans/
Bonobos are renown for their sexual appetite. Common chimpanzees can become angry or violent, but bonobos defuse any such situation through sexual pleasure. They also greet and show affection to each other through sexual stimulation. Common chimpanzees do not engage in recreational sex, and mating only takes ten or fifteen seconds, often whilst eating or doing something else. Friendships and emotional attachments have no bearing on with whom a common chimpanzee mates, and a female in heat will generally mate with several males, who sometimes patiently wait their turn directly after each other. Humans experience sexual pleasure, like bonobos, however even sex for reproduction only takes much longer and requires more effort; long-term partnerships naturally form as a result. Unlike humans, chimpanzees have no concept of sexual jealousy or competition, as they do not take long-term partners.
Next, we will compare Hominini with Panini and especially Muslims with chimps and Christians with bonobos:
Remember, Chimp males are not free and might be killed on leaving the group. Although it is known two brothers were ever allowed to join another group:
No comments:
Post a Comment