(221) Reordering the human mind

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive

In Islam homosexuality, masochism (for males) and female sexual roles are repressed in the unconscious as inferior sexual roles, while corresponding individuals are seen as objects like tables and chairs. Male heterosexuality prevails as subjects in the conscious:

Islam is the prototype of a male kin bonded lineage tribe, with the absurd behavior of ploughing back the genes of the own daughters into the male lineage (cousin marriages):

Because 'other sexual roles' are suppressed, we know the conscious and the unconscious side of this ideology:

Next we place the Allah construct in the middle of the model: 

The subconscious

"In the strict psychological sense, the adjective is defined as "operating or existing outside of consciousness". (WIKI)

It does not matter for what reason the subconscious is outside the conscious as long as it is not in the unconscious. It simply must be seen as a transition phase between the unconscious and the conscious.

Maybe the Allah-construct has a semi-conscious function as subconscious, because although 'other sexual roles' are suppressed in the unconscious, they are not totally forgotten. Though females are unnoticed and worthless individuals in this male kin bonded tribal lineage, they are amply needed as incubators of family semen:

Also remember, we are outlining the religion of a whole culture, a patriarchal culture, but of course, for Muslim females it is all different. They are completely aware of their place in society and their sexual role is in their conscious. So, Muslim females have a bigger conscious and must be mentally healthier than males:

SM-dyad

The only bridge between the conscious and the unconscious is the subconscious. This concerns the SM-dyad:

We will see how SM-dyad colors the relation between the states of mind:

The subconscious is fed by the unconscious and the conscious. From the unconscious we get ancient feelings and beliefs which we do not realize. Though the unconscious is suppressed it has a major influence on our attitudes in daily life. If a whole people have the same unmotivated feelings, than their thoughts might be fed by the postulated collective unconscious (C.G. Jung). In the Muslim population we perceive a general ideological attitude which they see as 'religion', where we consider religion as a steering mechanism on sexual culture.

To transport postulated primal feelings from the unconscious to the conscious we need a transformer in the subconscious. This transformer is SM-dyad, which attains the conscious without openly revealing these feelings. So, from the features of SM-dyad of Muslims we try to trace back the underlying feelings in the unconscious.

From SM-dyad male heterosexuality is in charge in the conscious and 'other sexual roles' are oppressed and suppressed in the unconscious. This all means the character of SM-dyad will be colored in the subconscious, which influence must explain the very nature of SM-dyad in all fora of the Muslim society:

So, a third degree of freedom as the subconscious might be helpful, also for modelling future interactions between sexual roles. And yes, now I see, with Christianity gods and roles both lie in the conscious, so no problem. Also in Christianity, gods and roles are interchangeable, since God is the hetero Alpha male and Jesus covers 'other sexual roles'.

Below, God and Jesus are in the conscious and there is no problem where to place 'other sexual roles':

In Islam I placed tribal gods and animal statues into the unconscious, which is correct. But animal statues are neither analogous nor identical to 'other sexual roles'. Humans are no animals. That is somewhat artificial and now we see, how a good scheme filters errors out of the theory:

'Other sexual roles' were a rest-group which accidentally merged with 'tribal gods and animal statues'. And indeed, the latter are NOT in the conscious anymore, what however does not mean that 'other sexual roles' can be interchanged with animal statues. So, as a compromise we will give 'other sexual roles' a place in the subconscious AND in the unconscious. In the same way, 'heterosexual males' will be seen as a transition figure between the conscious and the subconscious. This will give us also more freedom to let both groups interact:

Of course there are many female fertility gods, which are human statues and there are also statues for 'other sexual roles'. Think about Greek homosexuals. So the matter is not just crystallized.

But we will correct the above scheme by placing 'animal' between hooks, (animal):

Also, we keep this rule, since it works perfectly in the conscious:

Now we only have to place the subconscious in between the conscious and the unconscious, to get a much more valid model:






This will be our working model in future articles:

                                    

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.