About Me

My photo
I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found.

Monday, 20 December 2021

(418) The Origin of the Myth of Paradise

 Basic Dimension




1: Paradise myth comes from the animal world

The original version of the Myth of Paradise comes from the animal world and was kind of initiation rite for young males to control adulterous females within the perimeter of the tribe, to maintain the male bloodline against foreign males:








In male kin bonded chimpanzee tribes, by definition, females come from other tribes and have different DNA. That's why these inbreeding cultures ultimately turn out to be outbred. But adultery from females with strange males from other tribes would introduce contaminated male DNAPreventing that is the rationale behind the Myth of Paradise.

- That is why the original Myth of Paradise, was a chimpanzee construction with out-of-tribe-born females. A myth, understandable without speech. 






- Understand that contrary to that initiation ritual, the biblical Myth of Paradise was a bipedal primate reconstruction with females born in the same tribe (Eve), subsequently mating with relatives:









So, in male kin bonded chimpanzee tribes, by definition, females come from other tribes and have different DNA. That's why these inbreeding cultures turn out to be outbred. And female adultery with strange males from other tribes is not accepted, because this introduces contaminated male DNA. That is why the original initiation ritual, the Myth of Paradise, was a chimpanzee construction with out-of-tribe-born females. A myth, understandable without speech.

In the chimpanzee myth, relatives are not suitable for mating:




But in later inbreeding cultures of bipedal primates, cousin marriages underlined inbreeding as sacred religion:




In this bipedal paradise myth, the hypothetical Serpent with his Apple would have been killed by bipedal primates:






Bipedal primates had great difficulty to meet other groups to exchange young females:



 
But if possible, they mingled:

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110601/full/news.2011.338.html

Teeth from ancient human ancestors suggest that females joined new social groups once they reached maturity.


A chemical analysis of australopithecine fossils ranging between roughly 1.8 million and 2.2 million years old from two South African caves finds that teeth thought to belong to females are more likely to have incorporated minerals from a distant region during formation than those from males.


"What that's telling us is that the females grew up somewhere else and they died in the caves," says Julia Lee-Thorp, an archaeological scientist at the University of Oxford, UK. 






2: In the Bible we probably see the chimpanzee version adapted to inbreeding:

In the Bible we see bipedal religion, which is predicated on inbreeding, which means Eve was not imported from another tribe and had same tribal DNA:

Ancient texts benevolently placed by Jewish scholars give much hidden information:

And this is what the God Of Inbreeding roared to the Serpent:
15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.  

With emphasis: 'her seed' must refer to tribal DNA from the male bloodline, which was also her tribe of descent, otherwise God would have no point *. This means Eve was an inbred product from the male bloodline. Then, we have the same plot as chimpanzees, but here females were plowed back into the male bloodline:

* Theoretically, Eve could have been a woman of foreign descent, who was then accepted as having DNA from her new tribe (her seed). But then the plot thins out.


So, realize that the God from Genesis must be the God of the inbred male bloodline:






These biblical roots of bipedal primate inbreeding had huge implications for Desert Religions, which relied on the Bible and opposed inbreeding:

We see nearly nothing in the Bible about inbreeding, reincarnation or resurrection. Yet, these are fundamental breakthroughs in the conceptual development of human religion:




Desert religions are predicated on the Bible, which is fundamentally based on inbreeding, which had to be more or less disguised by Jewish scholars. They could not project the Bible on inbreeding, its origin, nor on reincarnation from Homo erectus, the most important human religious revelation ever, nor on resurrection, because they knew that no one would believe that a word (resurrection) could ever beat a sexual instinct (reincarnation):



So, why did the Bible turn a blind eye to the most important revelation of human religious development: reincarnation? Because reincarnation puts divine power on tribal heads (Ego-theism), who no longer needed Desert Religions to be terrorized. Reincarnation is the counterpart of monotheism:





Adam didn't check and monitor Eve properly

Adam should have controlled Eve better with that alien Serpent from the other tribe and definitely should not have accepted the Apple as his child.

Of course the Apple was killed and Eve and stupid Adam were expelled from the earthly inbreeding paradise. Because, if they too were killed, they would have died as martyrs on sacred inbred ground, which would have tarnished the power of the myth. Anyways, there would be no outbred peoples left in the world and one needs two points in space to draw a line for direction, from sacred inbreeding to pagan outbreeding:






3: From bipedal primate religion to Muslim inbreeding

Remarkably, this original Bible narrative is still the current Muslim inbreeding model. As said, it dates from far before Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), who added reincarnation and the soul to his inbreeding religion:









Then, this must be the religious bipedal evolution:

- First bipedal primates worshiping Inbreeding (14 Mya; 300cc).
- Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) worshiping inbreeding for reincarnation.
- Islam consciously: worshiping resurrection in heaven of Allah (1400 Ya).
- Islam unconsciously: adding reincarnation from Homo erectus to resurrection:






- So, the first version of the paradise story labeled the inbreeding culture as the
earthly paradise and did not yet speak of heaven (Australopithecus (4.3Mya; 400cc)).

- Australopithecus believed in Genetic Immortality, in which tribal DNA survives, but the individual dies, simply animal religion.

- They needed no Tree of Knowledge of Autosomal Recessive Disorders, because these chimpanzee-like creatures (Australopiths) and later Homo erectus could stand inbreeding very well with their varied genome and did not die out easily:




The Tree of Knowledge of Autosomal Recessive Disorders only emerged with Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc), around the super volcano of Mount Toba (74,5 Ka). But it is not certain that the diminished genome of Homo sapiens was indeed caused by Toba. It deteriorated between 100-50 Ka (thousand years ago) to about 3,000 - 10,000 human pairs:




Anyways, only Homo sapiens dies out from inbreeding and needed a Tree of Outbreeding, the Tree of Knowledge to prevent Autosomal Recessive Disorders. 








It was also Homo sapiens (350 Ka: 1450cc), who conceived heaven in the parallel universe and it were Desert Religions which commanded believers to resurrect in heaven:



Desert Religions reversed the Myth of Abraham:






Desert Religions believed that the earthly inbred paradise of Australopithecus no longer offered the ultimate afterlife, so Homo sapiens swapped the inbred paradise on earth for the outbred or asexual paradise in heaven. And since asexuality falls back on the primal sexual law in nature, this amounts to outbreeding:







Desert Religions had two objectives. The first was to call a halt to inbreeding, because of the dire consequences for Homo sapiens with its impoverished genome:




But the second was to break the power of polytheism, from tribal ancestors with their divine power to rule their own afterlife, without intervention of earthly monotheistic rulers, who only wanted to forge armies from all those different tribes to conquer other peoples:







Before Islam, eternal life (earthly reincarnation) was combined with profane power. Below Satan offers earthly power, possession and immortality in a Kingdom that never decays in this universe:





In the Quran, Adam's sin was the rejection of the heavenly paradise in favor of the earthly Tree of Life (inbreeding culture and earthly wealth). 

Therefore, Adam was banished from heaven and women (outbreeding) remained the only candidates unconsciously embracing the entity of Allah in Heaven. This means that Allah actually became a god for women. And females stand for outbreeding, so also Heaven stands for outbreeding.

Eve was of no use to Islam, because she had already rejected the Tree of Life for the Tree of Knowledge of Autosomal Recessive Disorders. And inbreeding is a male sexual instinct. 

And so Adam was in a much better position to commit the sin of eating from the Tree of Life (Inbreeding), which btw had been the most desirable tree throughout the evolution. 

So, Adam ate from the Tree of Life, which was now suddenly banned because it was earthly reincarnation from inbreeding

And so, the paradise changed from earthly inbreeding to heavenly outbreeding. Too bad for Adam and all Muslim males who have an inbreeding instinct and therefore do not get to heaven.

So, 1400 years ago Muslim males believed in reincarnation through inbreeding, 
which is a super strong sexual instinct. Islam took the gamble to convert Muslim males to Heaven with the simple word 'resurrection'. But they had no idea that religion is predicated on a sexual instinct and not on a word. Therefore, Islam will have to indoctrinate their people forever, because a word can never defeat a sexual instinct.




And so, Muslim males unconsciously identify with Adam and Muslim females with Eve. And that's the tragic of the Muslim faith, which has become a hybrid religion from Reincarnation and Resurrection:


    


Saturday, 27 November 2021

(417) Between/Within variance in Sexual Models

 Basic Dimension




(417) Between/Within variance in Sexual Models




Between/Within variance

In statistics, an effect between groups can be relevant if it is significantly larger than the within groups variance:



In this article, this simple statistical instrument is used to model honor killings and to give it a somewhat better theoretical basis. 

All human sexual models come from the chimpanzee male bloodline instinct from 14 million years ago. And the way to handle them is with Between/Within variance over groups:



But substantively it is the Hate/Love connection, which is added to the honor killing theory in this article. 




This means that honor killings can take place in two ways: 

- The first way is honor killing resulting from hatred between groups (the bloodline model). For example, Romina Ashrafi (14 years) was killed by her father because she had sex with a man from another tribe:



In this scenario, the father killed Romina because of possible DNA contamination with another tribe not of his choice. Perhaps, he would have preferred an arranged marriage with her cousin (plowing back female genes into the family DNA).

And this is what the God Of Inbreeding roared to the Serpent:
15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.  

- But in the second scenario, she was killed with a sickle by her father because of a sick form of "love" from reincarnation psychosis. He did not hate his daughter and there was no resentment nor retaliation. This, because he killed her in her sleep and in retaliation he would have killed her when she was awake:




The real cause of honor killings

This means that in the Romina Ashrafi case the Chimpanzee Male Bloodline did not cause her death, but a failed reincarnation projection from her father in her offspring was the real reason. It's just that no one realizes this reincarnation effect:



Circumstantial evidence shows that even in Muslim culture, it is immoral to kill a daughter only because she had sex with an unwanted man. Therefore, there must be a hidden, additional and unconscious drive to kill Romina, not through hatred but through a twisted kind of 'love' from reincarnation psychosis, the real underlying cause of honor killings. As mentioned, hate did not play a (decisive) role in Romina's case.

So, HATRED arises from forbidden gene exchange BETWEEN tribes as between Romina Ashrafi and her unwanted friend in his thirties. Then, the father would have killed her friend in the first place. While in case of murder for LOVE - as the real cause of honor killings - the killing takes place WITHIN tribes (the murder of Romina by her father), the daughter whom the father 'loved' so much that he wanted to reincarnate in her offspring. He did not hate his daughter:



So hate and "love" happen at the same time, as two sides of the same coin, but not for Romina Ashrafi's father, who did not hate her, as we have been able to confirm.

Then, Between/Within variance refers to Hate and Love which are the keys to two components of honor killing. Two kinds which form an absurd identity and are intertwined and inextricable for Muslims, that is.




But whether honor killings seem to take place out of hatred between groups (Chimpanzee Male Bloodline) or out love within groups (failed reincarnation projection of the father in his daughter), in all cases it concerns the unwanted mixing of genes between tribes (outbreeding).

This means that honor killings definitely involve inbreeding, which is male religion. Women do not commit honor killings, in any way, never, but can be forced to take the blame.

Assumption 641All honor killings in Muslim culture are essentially based on a distorted and sick form of love from a failed reincarnation projection, even when we only notice hate, while "love" cannot be confirmed.


Below we derive Honor Killings and Vendetta from the chimpanzee male bloodline model.


Chimpanzees live in a male kin bonded lineage.

Chimpanzees preserve male group DNA by killing males from other tribes that invade their territory: 




They live in male groups that allow females to join them: Their male bloodline is based on pure inbreeding, which is luckily offset by wandering young females from other tribes, bringing the total tribal effect to outbreeding:



The Alpha male strives for inbreedingfemales desire for outbreeding:




Tribes that retain the male bloodline are a variant of the alpha male model with a strong inbreeding instinct not only for the alpha male, but for the male group as a whole.






We link  Vendetta and Honor Killings to the Chimpanzee Male Bloodline

Vendetta:

A private feud, originally between Corsican or Sicilian families, in which the relatives of a murdered person seek vengeance by killing the murderer or some member of his family.

Blood feud:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/blood-feud

- A blood feud is a long-lastingbitter disagreement between two or more groups of people, particularly family groups. Blood feuds often involve members of each group murdering or fighting with members of the other. 

- A feud in which the members of hostile families or clans murder each other.


Where would the Vendetta effect come from?

Vendetta possibly depends on a remnant of quadrupedal outbreeding chimpanzees:



Which model has fundamentally changed for Homo sapiens where females are also killed. But type of breeding (preservation group DNA) remains the main goal, also in outbred populations (Corsica). Or in battles between Bedouin tribes (inbreeding):



Vendetta:

In the event that Corsican or Sicilian families would kill each other within families at the same rate as between families, there would be no significant vendetta effect. Worse, both families would die out, in addition to vendetta hatred:



Vendetta or blood feud lost inbreeding in the evolution and is now also used in outbreeding, while Muslims made the strange step of plowing back female DNA into their male bloodline (cousin marriages). Well, that started 14 million years ago with the first bipedal primates:



Honor killings:

No afterlife projection from reincarnation

In the conscious, Muslims do not have an individual tribal afterlife projection (reincarnation), they only deliver their DNA in the (male) family genome. Their conscious afterlife is in Heaven of the parallel universe, where they are resurrected for Allah to be judged for heaven or hell. Which looks a bit like chimps, which also dump their DNA in the (male) family genome, while they themselves will die (genetic immortality in which the individual dies).


Chimps amount to outbreeding, some groups of Muslims to inbreeding:



Muslims consciously use the quadruple chimpanzee model, which also does not link individuals to an (earthly) afterlife. But Muslims also plow female DNA back into the male bloodline, creating autosomal recessive disorders:





Resurrection cannot defeat reincarnation:

For Muslim males reincarnation is suppressed in their unconscious and they are stuck with the chimpanzee model, without personal identity and without a personal (reincarnation) projection into the afterlife

They only have the indoctrinated resurrection in heaven of the parallel universe, which is far too weak to eradicate reincarnation, which is a real sexual instinct:



Final model honor killings:



This all means we must separate the Muslim conscious from their unconscious to expose the schizophrenia that kills 20,000 Muslim girls every year and millions in the past 1,400 years:



(127) Anthropologist and psychiatrist on honor killings

Ignorant of their own unconscious, honor killers will tell Western cultural anthropologists that hatred and revenge were their motives. And so the Dutch came to 'Eer-Wraak', Honor- Revenge. But that's only half the truth and reason that Western psychologists never understood honor killings as a basically deep act of 'love', which I can barely get out of my pen:



Only half the truth:



ADDENDUM:

The evolution of human sexuality

Chimpanzee male kin bonded lineage

We are fortunate that the template of the most basic form of reproduction from our distant ancestors still exists in chimpanzees. Chimp males strive to inbreeding and females to outbreeding. The tribal result is an outbred population of chimpanzees.

But the first bipedal primates (14 Mya; 300cc) as distant ancestors of Australopithecus (4.3-3 Mya; 400cc) (Mya = million years ago), often switched to inbred cultures out of necessity:




Like chimps they had a varied genome and easily survived extreme inbreeding. And just like chimpanzees their religion was based on 'tribal genetic immortality', in which the tribe survives but the individual dies. Well, that's simply animal religion.




The only difference with chimps is that later bipedal primates (Muslims) plow back female DNA into the male bloodline, which is a morbid deviation from normality:




Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) invented the earthly afterlife and the soul, to be able to choose his own tribe in the afterlife. So, erectus as the first human, invented reincarnation, reincarnation in the own tribe, that is:




Homo erectus also fundamentally changed the chimpanzee bloodline model. Because through reincarnation in the offspring there arose a personal afterlife projection of the individual apart from tribal eternal identity. Both types of afterlife existed in the conscious and worked together in 'perfect' harmony. 

With the onset of Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc), humans invented the parallel universe and resurrection in heaven. Then, a religious problem arose between two existing human species in which Homo erectus chose for reincarnation and Homo sapiens for resurrection:




This dispute was solved by the Solomon's judgment of God: The real myth of Abraham:




But Desert Religions reversed the Myth of Abraham and introduced their monotheistic terror on females:





Muslims are heirs to the inbred religion of the first bipeds. Therefore, the Muslim faith is a fossilized primal religion, completely polluted with the parallel universe from Desert Religions, which devastates women's life for already 1400 years. It is a mixed, hybrid faith:








A fundamental change in the model of Homo erectus' male bloodline (reincarnation) has been made by Islam (enforced resurrection), which indirectly causes the death of both males and females through maximal 20,000 honor killings a year (refusal of marriages between cousins). While chimpanzees only kill males and offer females free passage between tribes.

So, where chimpanzees only kill males from other tribes, which otherwise would pollute their male bloodline, Muslims kill men and women (refusal of cousin marriages) for the same reason, though more precisely, for their failed reincarnation projection.

A big difference with chimpanzees is that Muslims kill females when their personal afterlife projection in the offspring is at risk, for example because the daughter chooses an unapproved man (Romina Ashrafi).

From the fact that even Muslim culture morally disapproves of killing for protection of the male bloodline of the family, we conclude that a failed reincarnation projection of the father must be the additional and decisive reason for honor killing in the unconscious, effectuated in the conscious:





Assumption 639: The cause of Honor killings.

Honor killings are caused by a combination of two effects: the conscious and the unconscious

The conscious: 
In the ancient chimpanzee instinct, the male blood line is protected by killing males from other tribes, while young females are free to leave. This means that the male kin bloodline is based on male inbreeding, but the exchange of females turns it all into outbreeding

In the Muslim population this chimpanzee instinct is still active, but now by killing males and females who do not serve the male kin bloodline by not entering into cousin marriages.

The chimpanzee instinct itself is too weak to explain the murder of Romina Ashrafi. But it acted as a guideline in her father's conscious. This means that the chimpanzee instinct indicated the domain in which Romina's murder would be committed.

The unconscious: 
But to actually commit the murder, a reincarnation psychosis in her father's unconscious was necessary. Often women are murdered by psychotics who project into them a sick love that is not reciprocated. That is also what happened to Romina Ashrafi.

That is why the murder of Romina Ashrafi is the cross product of her father's conscious and unconscious strivings.

FINAL CONCLUSION HONOR KILLINGS:

Assumption 640A failed reincarnation projection is the necessary and
sufficient condition for honor killings.

In contrast to chimpanzees, foreign male intruders in Muslim tribes are not automatically killed. Because Muslim fathers may accept marriage partners who are not family members. That is why the male bloodline is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for honor killings in the conscious. Necessary, because fathers do weigh their decision within the male bloodline domain. So, the male bloodline is the first selection criterion for possible marriage partners of their daughters in the conscious, e.g. Third cousins (Thrice removed). 

Based on the horror about honor killings within the Muslim community, the male bloodline is not seen as a morally acceptable reason. And that's why we will not find the real reason for honor killings in the conscious.

In the unconscious we find the reincarnation projection within the domain of the male bloodline of the father. His male DNA is a necessary condition for the reincarnation projection, because he wants to reincarnate into his own family DNA.

This means the unconscious reincarnation projection comes down to the necessary
and sufficient condition for honor killings in the unconscious as well as in the conscious. Which means that all those incomprehensible honor killings in the Muslim culture ultimately are predicated on an unconscious sexual instinct: Reincarnation through inbreeding.

The final conclusion is that honor killings are caused by a failed reincarnation projection of Muslim males into offspring from female tribal members, who do not accept breeding within the male bloodline.