About Me

My photo
I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found.

Tuesday, 24 August 2021

(410) The Mixed-race assimilation paradox

 Basic Dimension




(410) The Mixed-race assimilation paradox

 

Between Black and White exists some kind of complementary understanding of organizing society. There are countless examples of their collaboration that brings society prosperity:




That is why at least part of the black population is unilaterally assimilated into white society after lifting slaveryAnd that assimilation is maintained as a forced one-sided assimilation by the Master-race, complete with a master racial weight. Blacks do not place (much) racial weight on Whites. I don't want to imagine the situation better than it is:




Assimilation can also be enforced by one-sided racism:

Integration process towards assimilation:

Racism equation:

a x Slave identity = 1 x Master identity(Balanced one sided racism: a = Master racism)

This assimilation is not true for the whole of the black population. But anyways, there seems to be natural complementary elements in the collaboration between black and white. Not everywhere, but it exists. And this situation of unilateral assimilation from Black in White is paradoxically also the cause of the failure of assimilation of the Mixed-race into the Master-race. These are opposing effects. Again not everywhere, but definitely at critical places in politics. That is the theory described here:



Mixed-race will not find easily its tribal identity:

Expected situation:

Derived situation in politics:



Mixed-race as trigger for destruction of the United States

It is not that people of African-American descent mixed with Caucasians will be the cause of the downfall of the United States, but they are the reason for uncoordinated action of third parties on a large scale to destroy the American DreamThrough the assimilation paradox they try to drive a wedge between the Black community. Their ultimate goal is to encourage dissatisfied African-Americans to rebel against the status quo of current society:







American racism cannot be understood without the Paradigm Shift to a sadomasochistic entanglement:

The interaction between racism and the paradigm shift: But as mentioned earlier, we previously missed an important intervening variable. It is not true that the Mixed-race with more Master-race DNA identifies better with the Master culture:

In the US two processes occur at the same time: 
The Paradigm Shift from Polytheism to Monotheism and nested within this shift the racist relationship between Slave-race and Master-race.

So, it is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in their paradigm shift.

Maybe the American public thinks it's all about racism, but political gangs have a different objective, although I doubt whether they know what they are doing.

And the 'proof' is that the same paradigm shift in Europe takes place without racism, because Muslims are welcomed in Europe by PC (see below).

So, it seems that it is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in a coming paradigm shift of sadomasochistic entanglement that ends in a whirlpool of sexual lust.

This paradigm shift is the transition between polytheism and monotheism. It is the core mechanism tilting bipedal primate religions for already 14 million years, ranging between SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad. Countless vortexes appear in the evolution, large and small, we look at it without seeing:




So, this postulated paradigm shift would not have much credibility, be it that it is akin to the bipedal species for already 14 million years, another speculation...


Human religions are functions of former religions and breeding is the crucial dimension:






For example: Currently in time, August 2021, Americans flee from Afghanistan in a mini Paradigm Shift from Polytheism back to Monotheism. Also here again we see the
sadomasochistic entanglement in the lustful killing of countless victims. Again and again in the evolution. We don't even notice.  

But this disorderly retreat by Americans must be seen as an incident, an accident. Really? Why, for ultra left postmodernists in the government knew what was coming. BTW, reasons do not matter, it is the shift showing up time and again. There must be an underlying lust behind these rationalizations.

The Taliban is against Western culture through sexual ideology. Postmodernists in the Government of Biden are also against Western culture by neo-Marxism. They work together, consciously or unconsciously.

We saw the same repetition of moves between Obama and the Mullahs from Iran. Both did not like Western culture. Both, The Mixed-Race and Islam pursue the downfall of Western society. It's so obvious, the collaboration from Postmodernism with Monotheistic terror.


The Bipedal Paradigm Shift
















The  paradigm shift in Europe:


Actually the Paradigm Shift started with the Enlightenment, hundreds of years ago, what caused the end of Christianity. But all these movements including Marxism were not the cause, but outer signs of an inherent development within polytheism itself. So, the Enlightenment, Marxism, neo-Marxism and Multiculturalism are accompanying phenomena of fading Christianity. Apart from the Enlightenment they have no inherent significance.

So, the end time of Christianity started with the Enlightenment and accelerated with the onset of the Frankfurter Schule in the 1930s. Neo-Marxism of the 60s of last century was implied as well. But all these movements, such as multiculturalism in Europe, were of little significance. They were relatively irrelevant accompanying phenomena of the paradigm shift to monotheism. 

And so is postmodernism, what is an illogical twist from Marxism back to monotheistic terrorIllogical because it rejects any cultural law except the power theory about male hierarchies of white supremacy. Furthermore, it is racist:
Assumption 627: Identity politics:
Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religionracesocial backgroundclass or other identifying factor develop political agendas based around one or more of these categories.

Racism is an approach in which individuals of a particular race or ethnicity are identified on the basis of alleged group characteristics projected into them.

Racism is part of identity politics.

The first bipedal primates assumed that the appearance of individuals of a certain subspecies could be equated with their (deviating) tribal identity. Therefore, they easily confused the individual with his group based on external features.
So, on the way to its final phase of individualism, also called 'democracy' in politics, this transition to monotheism has been going on for hundreds of years.

We conclude that individualism is the solution of Western culture for tribalism, but it is a very unstable solution to lose group identity at the end. And we could understand individuality as individuals who first identified themselves with their support groups, but that is wishful thinking, because most individualists turn off from any group. Because they do not choose for individualism in the first place, but are just products of a huge evolutionary correction.

That's how it went around:


So, what really happens is that Christianity as polytheism fades into individualism, after which a monotheistic terror takeover will take place. That's the main law of bipedal evolution. And as political correctness is the messenger of dying Christianity in individualism, so postmodernism is the devil in disguise of identity politics from monotheistic racism:






How things are connected:

Inbreeding vs Outbreeding.
Monotheism vs Polytheism.
Collectivism vs Individualism.
SM-dyad vs Vanilla-dyad.
Postmodernism vs Political Correctness.




Individualism means banning God as the monotheistic tyrant from the red core.




But then masochism searches for new sadism as direction in space to complete its sexual lust:





And both Europe and the US are in the same process to find a new master:



Europe:


The United States:


It is the same process for already 14 millions years:






SPLITTING UP THE NATION

1: People from the Mixed-race have great difficulty identifying with their original Slave or Master-race. Identification in the middle - with equally matched DNA - is theoretically the most difficult for them. Although phenotype can be the decisive factor:




2: The Mixed-race is a hybrid between Black and White, between Africans and Caucasians. Apparently, these races are so far apart that the Mixed-race cannot easily converge to a new tribal identity:




3: After termination of slavery, the relationship largely stabilized in unilateral assimilation of former slaves into the master culture. Apparently, Caucasians and African-Americans found a way of life suitable for both parties, but that may be an unsubstantiated conclusion:




The Mixed-race again:




But as mentioned earlier, we previously missed an important intervening variableIt is not true that the Mixed-race with more Master-race DNA identifies better with the Master culture:




They definitely don't because the Master culture discriminates them as much as the other African-Americans.




Though they are sometimes as white as the White-race, they still have some African-American features, which triggers discriminatory remarks. As a result, they are hyper sensitive for 'wrong remarks' and despise the Master-race as tribal identity:




And that is quite understandable, fair enough. They have almost the same genes as the Master-race and wish to be treated equally. So, they obstruct the one-sided assimilation of African-Americans in the Master-race. They sometimes come to hate the White-race and call them 'White Supremacists':







And although they don't look much like African Americans any more, they try to identify themselves with them, what is not always credible. What we conclude is that the Mixed-race as a group will not find its tribal identity easily. 

And the more their DNA on the right side shifts to the White-race by interbreeding, the less credible will be their pretended 'African-American' identity. And that means that Mixed-race activists cannot converge to a new tribal identity on the right side, without losing African-Americans on the left in their ideological fight against the White-race.

And that means also that the longer they are waiting with a civil war, the more unlikely this can be won. But anyways, a civil war against 'white supremacists' is a Fata Morgana, due to other complications, which will be treated in the following articles.

Another complication is the size and complexity of populations to be mixed. Things are different from millions of years ago. Where in the evolution two finite groups ultimately completely mixed and created a new tribal identity, it is now no longer possible by infinite scaling up. 

So, the 'melting-pot society' has failed and will not converge at all into a new and overall American Identity, where The Flag and the American Dream also are losing symbolical value. 

It has been too easily assumed that the endless mixing of races and ethnicities will result into new tribal identities. The opposite seems to happen where groups will continue to distinguish themselves in all possible ways, as is common in the Fashion Industry. 

Then, ultimately the Nation will collapse into individualism, what means the end game of Christianity, from Polytheism on its way to Postmodernism and monotheistic terror. And therefore the US can forget about total assimilation. It will never happen. Poor integration is the highest feasible. And so we must fear failed integration processes to end in permanent racism. This because it cannot be completed into assimilation:

It is clear that the process of human racism can derail in the long run. The longer it stagnates without converging into integration or assimilation, the more difficult it is to untangle its terrible sequential interactions. Ultimately, the whole process breaks down into partly integrationassimilation and segregationIt is no longer possible to analyze this mess properly afterwards. We see this, for example, in the United States. The biggest problem of racism is identity politics, which is the resulting meaning of racism. The second problem generated by identity politics is to take no personal responsibility for life and to demand equality of outcome which ruins every society, instead of equality of opportunity which removes racism in the long run.




Sunday, 15 August 2021

(409) Paradigm Shift interferes with Racism

 Basic Dimension

(409) Paradigm Shift interferes with Racism




Racism nested in Paradigm Shift:

The paradigm shift has already been treated in (407) and is important for Europe, where former masochistic Christians suck up the sadistic Muslim culture. In Europe there is no extreme racism:




But in the US we have to deal with racism with regard to the forced imported African-American population. And tens of millions of Muslims were not begged to immigrate into the US:


Therefore, in the US one has to deal with an interaction between racism and paradigm shift. So, I realized that racism in the US cannot be properly understood, except combined with the paradigm shift from Europe, more precise from bipedal evolution. And therefore I dedicate a separate article to this interaction in the US:

The interaction between racism and the paradigm shift:

In the US two processes occur at the same time: The Paradigm Shift from Polytheism to Monotheism and nested within this shift the racist relationship between The Slave Race and The Master Race.

The American public may think that all this is about racism, but political gangs have a different goal lying in the paradigm shift, although I doubt whether they know what they are doing.

So, it is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in a paradigm shift.

And the 'proof' is that the same process in Europe takes place without racism, because Muslims are welcomed in Europe by PC.

It is important to pay attention to the theory around the Paradigm Shift:





But actually this Paradigm Shift started with the Enlightenment, hundreds of years ago what caused the end of Christianity. But all these movements including Marxism were not the cause, but outer signs of an inherent development within polytheism itself. So, the Enlightenment, Marxism, neo-Marxism and Multiculturalism are accompanying phenomena of fading Christianity. Apart from the Enlightenment they have no inherent significance.

So, the end time of Christianity started with the Enlightenment and accelerated with the onset of the Frankfurter Schule in the 1930s. Neo-Marxism of the 60s of last century was implied. But all these movements, such as multiculturalism in Europe, were of little significance. They were relatively irrelevant accompanying phenomena of the paradigm shift to monotheism.

So, on the way to its final phase of individualism, also called 'democracy' in politics, this transition to monotheism has been going on for hundreds of years.

That's how it went around:


In addition to this giga social religious process, many of the same developments will take place at micro level in the evolution. So, countless transitions will have taken place unnoticed. There is no line in, except the conversion from monotheism to polytheism and back:


So, what really happens is that Christianity as polytheism fades into individualism, after which a monotheistic terror takeover will take place. That's the main law of bipedal evolution. And as political correctness is the messenger of dying Christianity in individualism, so postmodernism is the devil in disguise of identity politics from monotheistic racism:


How things are connected:
Inbreeding vs Outbreeding.
Monotheism vs Polytheism.
Collectivism vs Individualism.
SM-dyad vs Vanilla-dyad.
Postmodernism vs Political Correctness.



Individualism means expelling God as the monotheistic tyrant from the red core. But then masochism searches for new sadism to complete its sexual lust. Because masochism as point in space has no direction, the tragedy of political correctness:




And so, both Europe and the US are in the same process to find a new master: 

Europe:


The United States:


It is the same process for 14 millions years:





This means the expulsion of God is also part of fading polytheism:

The God instinct of bipedal primates

For herd animals and especially bipedal primates the God instinct is placed in the right temporal lobe. Important for bipeds, it is connected to good and evil for already 14 million years. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality. So, you can imagine what happens if one tries to circumference the God instinct in politics. One will lose contact with voters. Like postmodernist democrats in Congress.



The God concept in American Politics

United States lost the notion of good and evil

Assumption 631: The power of God.
It's not about the existence of God. It is about the acknowledgement of God as ruler about good and evil in bipedal evolution. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality. 




Identity politics serve to direct individuals, who, however, unconsciously cannot forget their belief in God, their innate notion of good and evil. What notion cannot be overruled by any set of values from political gangs (Mao, Hitler or Stalin). It is the ancient God instinct linked to primal good and evil, which is important.

The first bipedal primates already developed the god-concept just like animals, from which primates lived in groups together around the Alpha male. The leader of the tribe decided between good and evil, what became our juridical instinct.

So, this god-concept is not from an old white male supremacist with grey hair, but is the overarching morality of good and evil, brought to us from antiquity through the Judeo-Christian culture.




This means the Judeo Christian culture - as a lot of other religions in the evolution - is bound to the primal morality of good and evil from bipedal primates. Of course religions can differ regarding good and evil, but not so much as we would think. There is a moral high ground that cannot be denied.

This moral concept works for monotheism (Islam) as well as for polytheism (Christianity). Well, these religions differ profoundly on good and evil, but that's another problem.


The Constitution

The reason for mentioning God in the Constitution is to unite the morals of voters on a common scale: from Good to Evil. Differences from insight between religious groups can then be discussed politically in parliament, because representatives have already accepted the basic principles of good and evil by their faith.

But if God no longer forms part of the constitution, rulers no longer reach the people on their unconscious wavelength. And then the country becomes ungovernable unless groups of people can be addressed differently through identity politics. This always happens with violent indoctrination. Earlier we already saw how powerless resurrection from Islam had to be indoctrinated for 1400 years, because it could not counterbalance earthly reincarnation in the unconscious.

So, removing God from the Constitution, from money and all kinds of official ceremonies, means to deny fundamental human values connected with good and evil on a very deep and primitive level of human functioning. For believers but also for unbelievers...




The political left does not believe in God and the Constitution anymore and want God removed from all government institutions. Then they will gain total freedom of acting, stripped of every morality.


But removing God from politics immediately leads to a Babylonian speech confusion about good and evil, in which ultra left straightens out what is crooked. In American Congress, ultra left has already taken extreme and uncontrolled freedom in moral handling. Although greedy and corrupt republicans (Rhinos) are not much better for other reasons. 

So, it is not because of religiosity of rulers that God is in the Constitution, but more to establish a common denominator as fundamental basis for bargaining about good and evil among representatives.

Assumption 631: The power of God.
It's not about the existence of God. It is about the acknowledgement of God as ruler about good and evil in bipedal evolution. The God-concept stands for our transcendent morality.

By the way, moral corruption has been in the American Constitution from the beginning, further stipulated in the 1870's by not accepting common objectifiable rules for the Union States in choosing representatives for the Federation. The United States, which want to teach the world democracy.

The United States of America are a Union of Independent States in the first place. They are the acting entities, they are the tribal identities. But to be able to govern this enormous country the States had to make concessions to the Federation, which has nearly no tribal identity. So, around 1870 the Union States were not held to any rule to organize their voting procedures in an orderly manner. And of course, that led to corruption from the start. A flaw in the Constitution? Definitely, at the least.



Racism nested in Paradigm Shift:

So in the US two processes occur at the same time: The Paradigm Shift from Polytheism to Monotheism and nested within this shift the racist relationship between The Slave Race and the Master Race.

It is not really about racism, but African-Americans are used by political gangs in their paradigm shift.

The American public might think that it is about racism, but political gangs have a different objective, although I doubt whether they know what they are doing.

And the 'proof' is that the same process in Europe takes place without racism, because Muslims are welcomed in Europe by PC.