About Me

My photo
I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found.

Sunday, 24 June 2018

(240) Why the Muslim population exploded after Mount Toba

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive  


Lake Toba


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lake Toba (IndonesianDanau Toba) is a large natural lake occupying the caldera of a supervolcano. The lake is about 100 kilometres (62 miles) long, 30 kilometres (19 mi) wide, and up to 505 metres (1,657 ft) deep. Located in the middle of the northern part of the Indonesian island of Sumatra, with a surface elevation of about 900 metres (2,953 ft), the lake stretches from 2.88°N 98.52°E to 2.35°N 99.1°E. It is the largest lake in Indonesia and also the largest volcanic lake in the world.[1]




Lake Toba is the site of a massive supervolcanic eruption estimated at VEI 8 that occurred 69,000 to 77,000 years ago,[2][3][4] representing a climate-changing event. Recent advances in dating methods suggest a more accurate identification of 74,000 years ago as the date.[5] It is the largest-known explosive eruption on Earth in the last 25 million years. According to the Toba catastrophe theory, it had global consequences for human populations; it killed most humans living at that time and is believed to have created a population bottleneck in central east Africa and India, which affects the genetic make-up of the human worldwide population to the present.[6] Debate exists regarding the catastrophe theory.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj1ds5JsyGE




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe_theory

Genetic bottleneck theory


The Toba eruption has been linked to a genetic bottleneck in human evolution about 70,000 years ago,[28][29] which may have resulted from a severe reduction in the size of the total human population due to the effects of the eruption on the global climate.[30] According to the genetic bottleneck theory, between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, human populations sharply decreased to 3,000–10,000 surviving individuals.[31][32] It is supported by genetic evidence suggesting that today's humans are descended from a very small population of between 1,000 and 10,000 breeding pairs that existed about 70,000 years ago.[33]

Proponents of the genetic bottleneck theory (including Robock) suggest that the Toba eruption resulted in a global ecological disaster, including destruction of vegetation along with severe drought in the tropical rainforest belt and in monsoonal regions. For example, a 10-year volcanic winter triggered by the eruption could have largely destroyed the food sources of humans and caused a severe reduction in population sizes.[34] Ī¤hese environmental changes may have generated population bottlenecks in many species, including hominids;[35] this in turn may have accelerated differentiation from within the smaller human population. Therefore, the genetic differences among modern humans may reflect changes within the last 70,000 years, rather than gradual differentiation over hundreds of thousands of years.[36]

Other research has cast doubt on a link between Toba and a genetic bottleneck. For example, ancient stone tools in southern India were found above and below a thick layer of ash from the Toba eruption and were very similar across these layers, suggesting that the dust clouds from the eruption did not wipe out this local population.[37][38][39] Additional archaeological evidence from southern and northern India also suggests a lack of evidence for effects of the eruption on local populations, leading the authors of the study to conclude, "many forms of life survived the supereruption, contrary to other research which has suggested significant animal extinctions and genetic bottlenecks".[40] However, evidence from pollen analysis has suggested prolonged deforestation in South Asia, and some researchers have suggested that the Toba eruption may have forced humans to adopt new adaptive strategies, which may have permitted them to replace Neanderthals and "other archaic human species".[41][42]

Additional caveats include difficulties in estimating the global and regional climatic impacts of the eruption and lack of conclusive evidence for the eruption preceding the bottleneck.[43] Furthermore, genetic analysis of Alu sequences across the entire human genome has shown that the effective human population size was less than 26,000 at 1.2 million years ago; possible explanations for the low population size of human ancestors may include repeated population bottlenecks or periodic replacement events from competing Homo subspecies.[44]

                                                            -------------------

Discussion:

The Toba super eruption is not what we are looking for. More importantly is the seriously shrunken genetic variation of Homo sapiens just after this disaster. This has been confirmed by scientific research. That is all what matters.

The evolution of bipedal Hominids has been a contiguous bottleneck of impending extinction. But like chimps they had enormous genetic variation. The same conclusion can be drawn for Homo erectus. All these species were on the verge of extinction but managed to survive severe inbreeding by exuberant genetic variation.

The sixty-four-thousand dollar question is why 
Homo sapiens lost so much genetic variation. There have been a lot of bottlenecks earlier than the Toba super eruption, but Toba was a devastating disaster at the right moment in time. That makes Toba so special.

And after Toba only small groups of humans migrated out of Africa what also will have diminished the gene pool. So, there may be more causes enacting to the declined genetic variation. And after Toba exploded the human population in the rest of the world. Indeed, Toba could have been the latest life threatening disaster for the species.

The San-people (Bushmen) in South Africa kept their genetic variation and escaped the Toba disaster of 74,000 years ago:

About 140,000 years ago human populations from East or Central Africa moved southwards and colonized western southern Africa. The probable nearest living relatives of these source populations are: the Hadzabe people from north-central Tanzania and  Mbuti pygmies from the eastern Congo. This migration gave rise to the present-day San hunter-gatherers (Bushmen)The San-people (and the Khoisan-group) are seen as the oldest Homo sapiens with the greatest genetic variation. They are said to show the human population genetic footprints:




'On the other hand, human population groups worldwide outside Africa are highly homogeneous genetically. This means, inbreeding with autosomal recessive disorders occurs sooner between Asians and Caucasians than within two neighbouring tribes of San people. They simply have more genetic variation in one tribe than we in the whole world.'




Shrinking genetic variation of Homo sapiens caused the Tree of Knowledge, knowledge of autosomal recessive disorders: 



But it was also disastrous for inbreeding cultures. They had to find ways to survive by capturing outbreeding peoples for fresh genes. Even today we see the outer mantle of religious endogamy of Islam as a reservoir of fake Muslims, later Muslims who are no Arabs and were previously exogamous peoples:



Interesting facts:


DNA apparently from KhoisanSan hunter-gatherers (Bushmen):


Ethnogeographic distribution

High-frequency populations

The highest frequency of occurrence of epicanthic folds is found in specific populations or ethnicities: East AsiansSoutheast AsiansCentral AsiansNorth AsiansPolynesiansMicronesiansIndigenous peoples of the Americas, and some African peoples (especially among Khoisan and Nilotic peoples). 





The influx of Muslims in outbreeding cultures (Western Europe)

Contrary to what the European Union makes us believe is the immigration of Muslims not religiously neutral. Simply because Muslims have the holy mission to conquer and defeat original populations:


Muslims will always try to take over the endogamous core of norms and values and thereby defeat the original exogamous population (Christians). 


But how come? Why are Muslims doing this? Why do they not want to assimilate with other peoples? If we learn that we will understand Muslims much better. Here is what they do:



Muslims expansion of genomic variation


They are looking for attractive and wealthy exogamies (Western Europe):


They infiltrate with low profile until their population is strong and big enough to defeat the host:


They occupy the endogamous core of norms and values and enforce their insane sexual culture on the original population. This is not my idea, it is from the Koran:



Inhabitants will be killed unless they agree to become Muslims, for genome refreshing of the inbreeding culture, which otherwise would go extinct by autosomal recessive disorders:



Above a new layer, a new mantle is laid around the Muslim-population now including  Western slaves, 'new fake Muslims' captured in the mantle. This new mantle is called 'religious endogamy':



Hence, the new 'Muslims' are not genuine Arabs but fake Muslims, occupied peoples. They are found in the religious endogamous mantle of Islam:


Just like 'genuine' Muslim females, policor Christian females will get a terrible life in Islam:



That's why Muslims never assimilate and remain a closed group against the original population:


All this does not have to be proven, since it has been shown by history time and again. The Sexual Theory of Religion is a model in which the psychology of Muslims can be traced and their future behavior outlined and predicted:


Muslims will never assimilate with other groups, since that means the end of their inbreeding culture. They will not even integrate easily. 


Shrinking genetic variation in inbreeding cultures

It is natural law that exogamous cultures in the evolution will always be defeated by endogamous cultures which occupy their cores:


It has been 74,000 years ago that Mount Toba exploded en eradicated the genome of Homo sapiens for the bigger part. This diminished the variation in the human genome to levels of extinction. It also introduced the Tree of Knowledge of autosomal recessive disorders.



This is why inbreeding cultures had to conquer more healthy exogamous cultures to get the desperately needed genetic variation in their mantle for not to die out. Defeated peoples had the easy ballotage choice to say they want become Muslims or die. Of course they became Muslims and the Muslim genome got fresh blood in their religious mantle:


Muslims will never assimilate with other groups. They will not give up their group identity. Assimilation means the end of their inbreeding culture. They will not even integrate easily. 

So, the real reason for Muslims is to refresh their human genome and definitely not to assimilate with exogamous people. It is the old primate male kin bonded lineage from chimpanzees, which only needs the fresh bodies of juvenile femele apes for not to die out. It is as an ant colony that keeps lice, which keeps Christians in the mantle:


That's how Muslims came to 1,6 billion followers. So, inbreeding cultures will forcibly impose their sexual rules on their new exogamous mantle. It is just the lobster looking for a new shell:





Muslims can not be changed

There is no reason for thinking the Muslim population can be changed. They are the latest successors of the inbreeding and incest culture of Australopithecus. This means the roots of the Muslim culture date of seven million years ago.

From Homo erectus (1,8 Ma) originates the difference between polytheism and monotheism. It turns out Christianity is polytheistic and Islam monotheistic. It is our opinion that a lot of social contradictions can be traced back to the difference between polytheism and monotheism. All this leads to the conclusion that it is impossible to integrate the Islamic culture in the Western world, let alone assimilate. It turns out in civil war between policor and anti-policorm, which will start from parallel societies:







                                     



cc-by-nc-sa






This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

Friday, 22 June 2018

(239) Political correctness is basically polytheism

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive





Polytheism and monotheism




It is clear that only one God is worshipped in monotheism, while at least two gods are honored in polytheism. But looking into Greek history reveals that 'gods' actually stand for 'sexual roles' what changes the plot considerably. This means monotheism stands for the strongest sexual role, for male heterosexuality. Then we think of Allah from Islam.

Polytheism stands for at least two gods, two sexual roles, for example God and his son Jesus. That we call semi-polytheism. Now remember, God as the Alpha male has the sexual role of male heterosexuality while Jesus covers the rest, other sexual roles. Then both cover the full sexual spectrum, which can actually be called full polytheism, since Jesus stands for all other gods. Indeed, Jesus protected the weak, especially women. Hence, Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality.

Proceeding, the limit of the number of possible gods is the number of individuals with free genderchoice and free sexual role. Then, polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in atheism where the godconcept loses every meaning as common denominator. Hence, in the limit polytheism loses its significance in complete individualism. And you know the difference between Western society and Islam is the group. The Western world evolves to individualism, while the Muslim world is still a closed group.

All this means that polytheism is the deeper sexual ground of Christianity, of Romanticism, of Marxist relativismsocialism or policor (political correctness). 

The botomline is policor versus anti-policor is a split in sexual attitude. Also it is a split in human religion. It is the same split as between Christianity and Islam. It is a physiological split in the human brain, causing two kinds of Homo sapiens. But they can not avoid each other and will set up parallel societies before this degenerates into civil war.



Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity and Islam, exogamy and endogamy, outbreeding and inbreeding.

Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.

Polytheism and monotheism

It is clear that only one God is worshipped in monotheism, while at least two gods are honored in polytheism. But looking into Greek history reveals that 'gods' actually stand for 'sexual roles' what changes the plot considerably: 


Greek gods

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.  



Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles.
4: Fourth God: pedophilia.
5: Fifth God: bestiality. 

Monotheism stands for the strongest sexual role, for male heterosexuality. Then we think of Allah from Islam:



Polytheism stands for at least two gods, two sexual roles, for example God and his son Jesus. This we call semi-polytheism:



Now remember, God is the Alpha male:



God has the sexual role of male heterosexuality while Jesus covers the rest, other sexual roles:



Then both cover the full sexual spectrum, which can actually be called full polytheism, since Jesus stands for all other gods. Hence, Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality:




Indeed, Jesus protected the weak, especially women:


John 8

Chapter 8

Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.
And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

In this narrative Jesus protects the weak. But there is a hidden message. The deeper ground is Jesus puts monotheistic endogamy into perspective and shows understanding for polytheistic exogamy. In fact Jesus downplays adultery. Adultery means genetic diversity and refers to the primal law of nature:

Assumption 193: The primal law of animal religion is the commandment: thou shalt reproduce in genetic diversity.


So, the deeper wisdom of this narrative is Jesus takes away from the monotheistic Tanakh and shifts to polytheism.

Christianity covers the whole sexual spectrum, while Islam only respects male heterosexuality:




Proceeding, the limit of the number of possible gods in polytheism is the number of individuals with a free choice of gender and sexual role.

Assumption 363: The limit of the number of possible gods in polytheism is the number of individuals with a free choice of gender and sexual role.

Then, polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in atheism where the godconcept loses every meaning as common denominator.

Assumption 364Polytheism ultimately finds its asymptote in the individualism of atheism where the god concept loses every meaning as common denominator.




Hence, in the limit polytheism loses its significance in complete individualism. And you know the difference between Western society and Islam is the group. The Western world evolves to individualism, while the Muslim world is still a closed group.

All this means that polytheism is the deeper sexual ground of Christianity, of Romanticism, of Marxist relativismsocialism or policor (political correctness). 

And monotheism is the deeper sexual ground of Islamsadistic male heterosexuality terrorizing other sexual roles:



The botomline is policor versus anti-policor is a split in sexual attitude. Also a split in human religion. It is the same split as between Christianity and Islam. It is a fysiological split in the human brain, causing two kinds of Homo sapiens. But they can not avoid each other and will set up parallel societies before this degenerates into civil war.



Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity and Islam, exogamy and endogamy, outbreeding and inbreeding.

Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.


Polytheism, monotheism and sexual freedom

There is a lot of articles about sexual freedom on this blog. Time and again our conclusion is female sexual freedom is terrorrized by monotheism, and only monotheism is capable of maintaining a horrible inbreeding and incest culture, blackmailing females for seven million years. Males are much stronger than females and should not need 'religion' to oppress their outbreeding instinct. The real reason for monotheism is that females think that immanent Allah can see their adultery and will report to her husband:

'Transcendent deceased gods of the inbreeding era mingled with immanent ancestors from reincarnation. Now, adulterous cousins were inspected internally by immanent gods, who reported for stoning immediately. This combined religion of genetic immortality with reincarnation perfected tribal control on cousins.'




We know there are a lot of female gods in Greek polytheism. We also know there is no divine female sexual role in Islam, which is the prototype of monotheism. This has been shown earlier: 



We think about the onset of Homo erectus around 1,8 million years ago, polytheism developed genetic diversity as a healthy reaction to the inbreeding culture of Australopiths. Though it must be said Australopiths and early humans had enormous genetic variation and usually survived their own inbreeding practice:



In the evolution polytheism was no quaranty for full sexual freedom for women, since it interacted with ancient cultures. Thus, let us be clear that we do not base political correctness on traditions from ancient polytheism, but on our own theoretical construct. 

We base our theoretical definition of polytheism on: 

1: Multiple gods are multiple sexual roles.
2: Polytheism means conscious empathy with all other sexual roles.


Assumption 367Theoretical definition of polytheism based on: 
1: Multiple gods are multiple sexual roles.
2: Polytheism means conscious empathy with all other sexual roles.







And from that timeless definition of polytheism we make predictions about the future of mankind. This is our take on polytheism:

Assumption 365: Polytheism and monotheism. 

- In polytheism, multiple sexual roles are seen as multiple gods. In monotheism only one sexual role is acknowledged as God, usually male heterosexuality. 

- In polytheism all sexual roles are empathically acknowledged in the conscious. In Islam only male heterosexuality is accepted in the conscious, while 'other sexual roles' are suppressed in the unconscious. 


- Respect for female sexual roles leads to equal rights in polytheism, in particular to  free partner choice. This means that polytheism promotes genetic diversity for women and exogamy with regard to other ethnicities, races and cultures. 

- Polytheism promotes respect for other sexual roles, for example LGBT. On the other hand monotheism does not acknowledge any of these sexual roles.


Assumption 366: Polytheism and monotheism are states of mind, leading to numerous religious wars in the evolution. This dimension is also called political correctness (policor) versus political incorrectness (anti-policor). Equivalents are: Christianity vs. Islam, exogamy vs. endogamy and outbreeding versus inbreeding.

Assumption 362: Polytheism is the overarching denominator of leftist policor, of globalism, of the reckless mixing of races and ethnicities all over the world and of dying Christianity in Western Europe. It is the absolute exogamy based on the full acknowledgement of 'other sexual roles' or LGBT, inclusive female heterosexuality.

We conclude female sexual roles are more respected in polytheism than in monotheism. But as said earlier, it is not to be expected that female sexual roles in ancient times and classical Greek history were about equivalent to male sexual roles. Of course not, but we are talking about a theoretical polytheistic model, which gives women in our time much more sexual freedom than in monotheistic Islam.

So if we upgrade polytheism to modern times, then we expect female sexual roles to be equivalent to male sexual roles. According to our modern polytheistic model women are entitled to choose their own partners.

And indeed, in Western society exogamy prevails and inhabitants can marry regardless of race and culture. This means closure between Marxist relativism, which declared all cultures equal and equivalent and exogamy, which allows people to marry other people all over the world.

So, polytheism leads to exogamy and freedom to merge races and ethnicities all over the world. That is why polytheism is the basic characteristic of socialism, Marxism and faded Christianity:


It is no secret that pedophilia is very popular in the highest socialistic circles.



The policor construct

Policor is the latest form of polytheism in a long row:


Remarkable, people gave polytheism different names in history. Apparently, they did not see the link between gods and sexual roles. For example, Christians think their religion is monotheistic, while they have at least two gods, God and his son Jesus. As said earlier, Christianity covers the whole domain of sexual roles from polytheism. So, Islam is right, Christianity is polytheistic.

Another example is the growing group of supporters who do not believe in God anymore. This development runs from the Enlightenment to atheism. They think they are the proud followers of an idiology, while they only talk about sexual roles, which are gods in our opinion. And every ideology which controlls sexual behavior of others is a religion, so, policor is a religion too.

Okay, policor is a religion, but how? Well, you know religions never talk about the parallel universe but always about sex. The same with policor, it is all about sex. It is about sexual roles, about Sodom and Gomorrah, the endstage of polytheism. They talk about free genderchoice and individual sexual roles, everybody seems to have his personal god, it is the endpoint of poytheism in individualism. They talk about 'other sexual roles', which are called LGBT, inclusive female heterosexual roles. They talk about the sexual merge of races and ethnicities, which is pure exogamy, an important aspect of polytheism. And the irony is that socialism is usually seen as a religion without a God. So people see the connection between socialism and religion, but do not recognize sexual roles from policor as gods.






cc-by-nc-sa





This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.