Assumption 241: Factors of pedophilia
There is a connection between power and pedophilia and therefore this happens mainly in "the highest levels" of church and politics. How it works:
1: The instinctive protection of children by their parents is the strongest emotion in child abuse (genetic diversity, exogamy).
2: But in inbreeding cultures, a much larger role plays the possible infringement of the virginity of daughters for inbreeding purposes or child marriages (genetic monoculture, endogamy).
3: In more civilized cultures two kinds of empathy developed. In polytheism and nowadays Western 'grooming', projection into children of the own sexual lust assumes they will appreciate sexual contact, whereas on the other hand real empathy concludes children are unable to safeguard their natural rights and must stay untouched (later Western culture) .
4: Actually, real pedophilia concerns sexual interest in children without matured secondary sex characteristics. Men attracted to already quite mature girls aged 13 are no pedophiles. This is called ephebophilia.
5: Because of the interpretation of natural rights of children a reasonable age limit of 16 years has been set. Between 13 and 16 years usually child abuse cannot be called 'pedophilia'.
6. The main difference with the animal world is human interest in children just because of immature sex characteristics.
7: If religion is a form of sexuality, then pedophilia is a form of religion in which the deranged desire for 'perpetual orgasm across generations' finds its greatest fulfillment in not yet burgeoned sexuality.
According to the state of science, sexual orientation should be regarded as given by nature and cannot be altered. Sexual preference and its unfolding are natural.
But pedophilia is a remarkable human phenomenon which is not seen very often in the animal world, for sexually immature animals are not attractive, though animals like monkeys may practice pedophilia as role play.
Hence, human pedophilia is a relatively modern sexual variant which must have been formed in 7 million years after separation from the other apes. Because earlier we developed a model of the sexual and religious evolution of the Homininae we now draw a straight line to pedophilia.
Though pedophilia is probably given by nature, in human evolution it could have been contaminated with hereditary psychological disturbances of sexual expectancy.
Pedophilia is just like inbreeding and incest an instinct formed at the time of the first Homininae and has been contaminated with religious thinking. And because religion is a form of sexuality, psychological delusions may have affected human sexual genetics. We claim human pedophilia is a direct consequence of the inbreeding culture of the first Homininae and has a strong link with eternal fertility of males.
Assumption 257: Remember, big apes (Hominids: 20 mya; 350cc) matured earlier than humans at about 8 years. The same for Homininae (7 mya; 400cc), including Australopiths and Homo Naledi. Also for nowadays chimps and bonobos (400cc). Even Turkana boy 1.6 mya (Homo ergaster 1.9 mya; 900 cc) had about adult size at 8 years (152-179 cm). But Homo sapiens got too big brains and matures at about 13 years.
Assumption 233: Perpetual orgasm across generations is a form of pedophilia born out of inbreeding. It first served genetic saturation of the tribe (genetic immortality), in which sexually mature daughters were fertilized by their fathers. In the second instance, this orgasmic lust developed as a reward for inbreeding. In the third instance, mating over generations signified extreme libido, causing perpetual orgasm to develop as the core of human male religion.
Later, perpetual orgasm developed as incestuous pedophilia with sexually immature daughters to avoid autosomal recessive disorders.
Perpetual orgasm across generations is projected in this lifetime and after death. In this lifetime, it means raping and fertilizing very young persons. After death, ancestors will mate with distant descendants after reincarnation. And in the ultimate case, very old men want to mate with countless virgins in the parallel universe.
This change to sexually immature daughters is called displacement of perpetual orgasm across generations. Incest with sexually mature daughters has been forbidden in a long, long struggle for millions of years:
Pedophilia with sexually immature girls is the first displacement (or substitution) in Homininae culture. Remember, with sexually immature persons perpetual orgasm lost every connection with inbreeding:
Here we start our model of pedophilia:
Tuesday, Oct 11th 2016
Muslim father rapes his daughter as punishment because she had become 'too Westernised' living in Norway
- The man, in his 40s has been charged with rape and incest after he attacked his daughter in their family home
- The daughter ran out of the house in the city of Fredrikstad and told a passing postman who called the police
- The daughter told police she had been punished by her father for living a Western lifestyle
Nowadays, hard pedophilia (rape) concerns the lust in sexually immature boys and girls. It is an unnatural human sexual drive evolved out of inbreeding which is only viable in sadomasochistic cultures.
As a 'logical' result of the raping of immature daughters, they were sold for child marriage just before sexual maturity. It also is a form of outbreeding:
This way, institutionalized pedophilia became the evolutionary end stage in inbreeding cultures of Homo sapiens based on the SM-dyad (unequal sexual roles). A good example is child marriages in Islamic culture:
2: Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe (Homo erectus, 2 mya, (900 cc))
3: Reincarnation into the parallel universe (Homo sapiens, 0.2 mya, (1450 cc))
From these side conditions, the evolution of human religion can be outlined:
Development of human religion
Now we proceed with our model of pedophilia in the same way:
Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
In the period of reincarnation, perpetual orgasm across generations still manifested in raping daughters and in child marriages. And for those who missed this pedophilic lust in this lifetime, there was a glimmer hope, because one would reincarnate into the tribe again and there would be new chances.
Assumption 158: Cultures imposing unreasonable restrictions on sexuality are purposely promoting sexual desperation in men, who then build an extreme expectation of sexual orgasm in an unknown universe of hope.
Assumption 153: With the invention of earthly reincarnation inbreeding lost its rational connection with genetic immortality and now became magically bound to earthly reincarnation.
Operant response: inbreeding Primary reinforcing stimulus:
genetic immortality in the offspringSecondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe
And in a way it still made sense. Males could only reincarnate safely into their own tribe if they enforced inbreeding on women during lifetime. Hence, inbreeding was not meant for immortality of their genes any longer, but instead inbred bodies served for reincarnation. And this latter relation became the principal connection in the inbreeding instinct, because it was the best reinforcer of inbreeding.
reincarnation where relationships were based on the SM-dyad. Perpetual orgasm was sublimated to the afterlife, not as moral obligation but rather as assurance of pleasure after reincarnation.
Reincarnation into the parallel universe
Assumption 151: The power of religion lies in the enhanced contrast between earthly and heavenly satisfaction of sexuality. Only the manipulation of sexuality can influence its religious derivative.
Operant response: inbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspringLater reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universeLater reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the parallel universe
Assumption 155: Genetic immortality does not exist as a primary reinforcer of inbreeding any longer. Early in human evolution it has been set aside by earthly reincarnation as a secondary reinforcer. Meanwhile inbreeding has been connected to earthly reincarnation for 2 million years. This connection is the prevailing human instinct. Reincarnation into the parallel universe failed to overthrow earthly reincarnation. Hence both forms of reincarnation are reinforcers of inbreeding.
Assumption 154: There exists a magical but reasonable connection between the parallel universe and inbreeding and incest. Earthly reincarnation offered endless orgasm in the afterlife of the tribe. But the prospect of the same unattractive cousins and sisters appeared no promise but a curse. Therefore Homo sapiens invented the parallel universe. It was the flight to an unknown paradise where one could have perpetual orgasm with 72 beautiful fresh woman slaves on an entirely new dimension.
Assumption 152: Islam is an endogamous inbreeding culture, offering a factually exogamous afterlife in heaven. A genetic monoculture on earth (Islam) flirts with genetic diversity in heaven (Christianity), where the latter must be seen as heaven on earth. Jealousy led to the persecution of Christians, because their masochistic suffering is compatible with exogamic lust. And violent blood lust and hatred discharged itself on Jews, because though their culture relied also on inbreeding and incest, their females were left free choice to exogamy as in the group of higher mammals.
Before the advent of Christianity, there was still belief in reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. But in Christianity the only projection of eternal life was allowed into the desexualized parallel universe.
(can be skipped)
And that meant the road to perpetual orgasm in Heaven was blocked. Sexual projections in the afterlife are unknown in Christianity, hence all sexual dreams and hard pedophile lusts (rape) had to be fulfilled on earth:
On the one hand, Christianity blocked the sublimation of rape on children and virgins in Heaven and on the other hand, also hard pedophilia (rape) on earth was prohibited. What remained was the invention of a totally new type of pedophilia (grooming), which has been quite acceptable within Christianity for a very long time: soft pedophilia. Soft pedophilia is a relatively new development in Western society coming from polytheism and possibly earlier from monkeys.
Soft pedophilia (Grooming)
Possibly soft pedophilia is not determined by physical attraction in the first place but rather by a distorted concept of sexual expectancy: displaced and sublimated orgasm. Displaced because, pedophiles cannot maintain satisfactory sexual relationships with adults. Sublimated, because in the Vanilla-dyad of Christianity raping children is forbidden and other ways for sexual satisfaction had to be found.
A complicating and confusing circumstance is that heaven of Christianity has been desexualized. Therefore pedophiles in Western society could not postpone their sexual self-realization until the afterlife.
Child marriages (with rape) developed into soft pedophilia (without rape; grooming) based on the Vanilla-dyad, which in the Western world is based on equal sexual roles and
equivalent relations. Hence, soft pedophiles are forced to displace rape for impermissible sexual acts, and to sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship.
For this purpose pedophiles project their infantile identity into children, degrading themselves as adults. In addition they sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship. They pretend to exchange sex for friendship and leave the child in turmoil for such declarations of abnormal amiability. If children do not protest against these unfamiliar touching then pedophiles conclude they can take responsibility and they will like it.
But it is not really empathy, what pedophiles are feeling; on the contrary it is a narcissistic disorder, a fake relationship with a non-existing entity, a sick self-projection into an innocent child. It is an escape from adulthood and sublimation and displacement of temporary orgasm within generations.
Assumption 229: Grooming. Pedophiles have paraphilic relationships based on unequal sexual roles. They project their infantile identity into children, degrading themselves as adults. They thereby sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship. If children do not protest against unfamiliar touching then pedophiles conclude they are taking responsibility and they like it.
Hard pedophilia is a typical form of human sexuality. It stems from sadomasochism in which blood lust mixes with sexual lust. There is no difference between sadomasochism and monotheism, for both form an identity wherein sadomasochism is the main factor in sexual space and monotheism is the identical principal component in polytheistic space:
(can be skipped)
Hard pedophilia is often an institutionalized form of sexual abuse in monotheistic societies as Islam (child marriages) or in the monotheistic Christian church, which raped boys on a massive scale and until recently sometimes cut off their balls to exterminate homosexuality.
But unlike soft pedophiles, Christian priests were well aware of their sexual appetites blocked in the afterlife. They consciously faced the compulsion to extinguish their passions in this lifetime.
The completely desexualized afterlife of Christianity brought homosexual priests to despair and madness. Compare this with Islam where such pleasures could be fulfilled in the afterlife.
In a sick stimulus-response chain, priests became sinner by raping boys, just because without sin no Fall of Man in Christianity. Homosexual priests were God's perfect sinners where they succumbed for the second god. But they could purify their souls by persecuting homosexuals outside the walls of the church. And that's why homosexual priests sometimes cut off the balls of innocent boys. Without sin no Christianity ....
Assumption 232: Pedophilia started with the raping of sexually mature daughters for genetic saturation of parental genes in the inbreeding culture. Meanwhile perpetual orgasm across generations developed as a pleasure and as reward for inbreeding. Both, inbreeding (tribal genetic immortality) and incest (perpetual orgasm for individual males) are compensating mechanisms for attaining eternal life.
The precise interaction between perpetual orgasm (incest) and the saturation of genes (inbreeding) is unknown yet. Raping of sexually mature daughters (incest) might have been justified by genetic saturation (inbreeding). But in the third instance, mating over generations signified an extreme libido, causing perpetual orgasm developed as the core of human male religion.
Because of autosomal recessive disorders, mature daughters have been replaced with sexually immature daughters later in the evolution. This is called displacement of perpetual orgasm across generations. Hard pedophilia (rape) with sexually immature girls is the first displacement (or substitution) in Homininae culture.
As a 'logical' result of immature raping, daughters were sold for child marriage just before sexual maturity. In this way hard pedophilia (rape) became the evolutionary end-stage of inbreeding cultures bases on the SM-dyad (unequal sexual roles). This is better known as child marriages in Islamic culture and others.
Unlike pedophilia, homosexuality is a well-known phenomenon in the animal world which did not arise from Homininae culture. But homosexuality combined with pedophilia (Christian Church) indeed comes from perpetual orgasm across generations. Hence perpetual orgasm does not discriminate on sexual orientation.
Later in the evolution, perpetual orgasm for a lot of other reasons sublimated into perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe. Both, displacement (pedophilia with sexually immature daughters) and sublimation (perpetual orgasm in Heaven) settled in the human mind as genetically transferable forms of perpetual orgasm. In human evolution religious delusions interacted with sexuality and formed new instincts which are completely unknown in the animal world.
Soft pedophilia (without rape; grooming) is based on the Vanilla-dyad, which in the Western world is based on equal sexual roles and equivalent relations. Hence, soft pedophiles were forced to displace rape for impermissible sexual acts, and to sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship.
For this purpose pedophiles project their infantile identity into children, degrading themselves as adults. They thereby sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship. If children do not protest against unfamiliar touching then pedophiles conclude they are taking responsibility and they like it.
It is not really empathy what pedophiles are feeling; on the contrary it is a narcissistic disorder, a fake relationship with a non-existing entity, a sick self-projection into an innocent child. It is an escape from adulthood and sublimation and displacement of temporary orgasm within generations.