.png)
Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Homosexual schizophrenia in Christianity
Christians empathically experience sexual roles in the conscious, but suppress bestiality in the unconscious. Split sexual identity emerges between homosexuality from the clergy, which is the leading group in Christianity and other gay citizens, who are insulted and denounced until they are creeping from sin and penance. Christianity is playing chess with sexual roles:
Semi-polytheism was an excellent opportunity for the homosexual clergy to take over the power from the Alpha male, which was just a trace in the brain inherited from the animal world. And so, it happened. The homosexual clergy pretended to perceive the tasks of God on Earth. But in fact it was a seizure of power and Christians tumbled in this coup with their eyes wide opened.
Semi-polytheism
Muslims are right, Christianity is no monotheism. If Jesus is the son of God, He must be divine himself. Then Christians have two gods to worship. And they do. Two antagonistic sexual roles: God = male heterosexuality and Jesus = other sexual roles, together include the whole sexual spectrum:
In relation to acknowledged sexual roles we also consider Mary and a lot of holy others. This means Christianity is in between Greek mythology and Islam.
Polytheism and monotheism
There is an important difference between Greek polytheism and monotheism. In Greek polytheism, homosexuality was an empathically acknowledged sexual role in the conscious:
Differing completely from Islam, which only recognizes male heterosexuality:
Homo-erotic coping behavior
Aggressive heterosexual males competed with the Alpha male as first gods. Hence, he preferred not to cooperate with them which only wanted to fertilize his females. He worked in a kind of homo-erotic relationship with the more friendly rank-and-file below him. But this lower echelon was not really homosexual and in turn was given special favors to fertilize females:
Muslim males are not in competition with Allah, they just show submissiveness. The reason is in monotheism males do not want to distort their heterosexual self projection:
Their divine Superego must remain more than their Ego and Id. They worship their heterosexual self projection, but in the rebound they worship themselves:
So, also in real life homo-erotism is demanded to lubricate the relationship between the Alpha male and the lower ranks. Also this behavior is disguisedly reflected from the unconscious as acceptable behavior. Below coping behavior between equivalent rank in monotheism:
The difference between the Alpha male model en monotheism is that in the former homosexuality is empathically In Greek polytheism, homosexuality was an empathically acknowledged sexual role in the conscious: as a sexual role. But this is not visiable in the scheme below:
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Homosexual schizophrenia in Christianity
Christians empathically experience sexual roles in the conscious, but suppress bestiality in the unconscious. Split sexual identity emerges between homosexuality from the clergy, which is the leading group in Christianity and other gay citizens, who are insulted and denounced until they are creeping from sin and penance. Christianity is playing chess with sexual roles:
Semi-polytheism was an excellent opportunity for the homosexual clergy to take over the power from the Alpha male, which was just a trace in the brain inherited from the animal world. And so, it happened. The homosexual clergy pretended to perceive the tasks of God on Earth. But in fact it was a seizure of power and Christians tumbled in this coup with their eyes wide opened.
Semi-polytheism
Muslims are right, Christianity is no monotheism. If Jesus is the son of God, He must be divine himself. Then Christians have two gods to worship. And they do. Two antagonistic sexual roles: God = male heterosexuality and Jesus = other sexual roles, together include the whole sexual spectrum:
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles.
4: Fourth God: pedophilia.
5: Fifth God: bestiality.
In relation to acknowledged sexual roles we also consider Mary and a lot of holy others. This means Christianity is in between Greek mythology and Islam.
Polytheism and monotheism
There is an important difference between Greek polytheism and monotheism. In Greek polytheism, homosexuality was an empathically acknowledged sexual role in the conscious:
 |
| Apollo, the death of Hyacinth |
Differing completely from Islam, which only recognizes male heterosexuality:
Aggressive heterosexual males competed with the Alpha male as first gods. Hence, he preferred not to cooperate with them which only wanted to fertilize his females. He worked in a kind of homo-erotic relationship with the more friendly rank-and-file below him. But this lower echelon was not really homosexual and in turn was given special favors to fertilize females:
Homo-eroticism assisted the Alpha male
Male homosexuality is the second god, to whom the Alpha male delegated his power. He trusted friendly and less aggressive males more than heterosexual males, which were competitive to females. Also in normal life we sometimes see homo-erotic behavior in the ranks just below the leader. It is no real homosexuality but a coping mechanism from lower ranked males.
This means homo-eroticism is also needed in desert religions. But as said before, it is not allowed as second god in the conscious. That is why Muslims do not officially recognize the need for homo-erotics in male relations, nor do they see the link with the second god. And that is why they found some other formulation for homosexual behavior: religious devotion.
Male homosexuality is the second god, to whom the Alpha male delegated his power. He trusted friendly and less aggressive males more than heterosexual males, which were competitive to females. Also in normal life we sometimes see homo-erotic behavior in the ranks just below the leader. It is no real homosexuality but a coping mechanism from lower ranked males.
This means homo-eroticism is also needed in desert religions. But as said before, it is not allowed as second god in the conscious. That is why Muslims do not officially recognize the need for homo-erotics in male relations, nor do they see the link with the second god. And that is why they found some other formulation for homosexual behavior: religious devotion.
So, the difference between polytheism and monotheism is that homo-erotic submissive behavior in monotheism is not named as such. In Christianity it is called 'piety', 'godliness' or 'devotion', while in fact it is a homo-erotic coping mechanism in disguise. In Islam it is called a nose kiss, or whatever...
Because Islam does not recognize homosexuality in the conscious, it cannot admit an openly homo-erotic relationship between man and his fictitious God. Well, praying clearly has a homo-erotic component, but this is disguisedly reflected from the unconscious and accepted as usual behavior: |
Ahmadinejad kiss
|
Muslim males are not in competition with Allah, they just show submissiveness. The reason is in monotheism males do not want to distort their heterosexual self projection:
Their divine Superego must remain more than their Ego and Id. They worship their heterosexual self projection, but in the rebound they worship themselves:
So, also in real life homo-erotism is demanded to lubricate the relationship between the Alpha male and the lower ranks. Also this behavior is disguisedly reflected from the unconscious as acceptable behavior. Below coping behavior between equivalent rank in monotheism:
The difference between the Alpha male model en monotheism is that in the former homosexuality is empathically In Greek polytheism, homosexuality was an empathically acknowledged sexual role in the conscious: as a sexual role. But this is not visiable in the scheme below:
We also see this kind of pleasing behavior with chimps. Also here the lower echelon is not really homosexual and in turn is given special favors to fertilize females.
Polytheism and semi-polytheism
Christianity is unlike Islam or Greek mythology:
Christianity is in between:
So, this is Christianity, in which the homosexual clergy is empathically experienced in the conscious but other gay people are rejected in theun subconscious.
Christianity recognizes homosexuality from the homosexual clergy in the conscious,
but rejects other gay citizens in theun subconscious.
This, until they confess and recognize their sin and will do penance.
Christianity roots in monotheism
Long ago, the group around Jesus escaped from monotheism, from Judaism. They went into polytheism, for they respected 'other sexual roles', like women. Christianity was embraced by European outbreeding cultures but originated from monotheism, and that is why gay hatred is also immanent to Christianity.
Christianity has been embraced by proud polytheistic Western peoples
In the evolution exogamous peoples embraced polytheistic religions. But Western peoples also embraced Christianity:
1) because of its respect for 'other sexual roles', except bestiality.
2) because of the rejection of inbreeding and incest.
3) but most importantly, because of the promise of life after death in heaven of the parallel universe.
Because inbreeding as base for Christianity was rejected, the Romans had to develop the completely new religious formula of 'guilt and penance'. In fact they developed the 'masochistic philosophy' out of Jesus' submissive behavior to his ''Father''. Below you see Christianity orthogonal to the inbreeding plane:
The greatest difference between polytheism and monotheism in relation to the gods is that in polytheism proud males were competing with the gods for females. They competed with Pan to fertilize all females, just like in the Alpha male mode.
But in monotheism a sad picture arises from creeping submissive males with butt up.
There is a homosexual tendency in monotheism which is functional but not well understood. Homosexuality is intertwined with monotheism in a bizarre way.
In the Alpha male model, males had a sexual ideal projection to defeat their God and to fertilize all females:
Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.
And in the animal world, males had a real Alpha male to defeat. But in the evolution the Alpha male became just a trace in our brain. So, human males have a fictitious Alpha male to defeat or to submit: it can be Zeus from polytheism or God from monotheism.
So, this is Christianity, in which the homosexual clergy is empathically experienced in the conscious but other gay people are rejected in the
Christianity recognizes homosexuality from the homosexual clergy in the conscious,
but rejects other gay citizens in the
This, until they confess and recognize their sin and will do penance.
Christianity roots in monotheism
Long ago, the group around Jesus escaped from monotheism, from Judaism. They went into polytheism, for they respected 'other sexual roles', like women. Christianity was embraced by European outbreeding cultures but originated from monotheism, and that is why gay hatred is also immanent to Christianity.
Christianity has been embraced by proud polytheistic Western peoples
In the evolution exogamous peoples embraced polytheistic religions. But Western peoples also embraced Christianity:
1) because of its respect for 'other sexual roles', except bestiality.
2) because of the rejection of inbreeding and incest.
3) but most importantly, because of the promise of life after death in heaven of the parallel universe.
Because inbreeding as base for Christianity was rejected, the Romans had to develop the completely new religious formula of 'guilt and penance'. In fact they developed the 'masochistic philosophy' out of Jesus' submissive behavior to his ''Father''. Below you see Christianity orthogonal to the inbreeding plane:
The greatest difference between polytheism and monotheism in relation to the gods is that in polytheism proud males were competing with the gods for females. They competed with Pan to fertilize all females, just like in the Alpha male mode.
But in monotheism a sad picture arises from creeping submissive males with butt up.
There is a homosexual tendency in monotheism which is functional but not well understood. Homosexuality is intertwined with monotheism in a bizarre way.
In the Alpha male model, males had a sexual ideal projection to defeat their God and to fertilize all females:
Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.
And in the animal world, males had a real Alpha male to defeat. But in the evolution the Alpha male became just a trace in our brain. So, human males have a fictitious Alpha male to defeat or to submit: it can be Zeus from polytheism or God from monotheism.
 |
| Zeus, Greek mythology |
Jesus and his "Father"
Jesus was in his thirties and apparently had an abnormal relationship with his "father". In the first place he likely would not have spoken about 'God, The Father' if he still had a father. Maybe he had a fatherless upbringing with an identification problem. Maybe a developmental disorder due to lack of a paternal attention. For, this is not normal behavior.
It is weird for a man in his thirties to glorify his relationship to a fictitious father. Now I do not think Jesus was gay because this relationship fits perfectly in monotheism from those days. Jesus has his personality split on the sadomasochistic dimension, on which he chose the masochistic role.
But the God of Jesus was no sadistic personality at all. Therefore, Jesus had a childlike relationship with his fictitious Father in which there was mutual trust.
Well, the Christian God was no sadist but definitely Jesus was a masochist. Then the main difference with Allah from Islam is the God of Christianity can be trusted under all circumstances, without threat or hatred.
This means Christianity gives a different interpretation of the relationship with God. Jesus rejects the sadomasochistic model and sees God as a trustful father. In fact Jesus rejects SM-dyad and accepts Vanilla-dyad, the main difference between monotheism and polytheism.
But if Christianity was pure masochistic in the mantle, Western peoples could not be tightened together as a mammal groups. And this created space for the Christian Church, which fulfilled the sadistic role in the core:
Jesus was a masochist and offered the perfect template for the later homosexual clergy to project their sinner role into.
In history, Christians gave Jesus an increasingly weak and masochistic appearance, here pictured amid androgenic angels. It is about sin and penance but it is worn by masochistic weakness:
 |
| Trinidad El Greco |
So, did the Christian Church like homosexuals? Did they embrace 'other sexual roles' like Jesus did? Well, maybe in Christianity homosexuals were not thrown headfirst from the building as in Islam, but do not forget in the Netherlands the Catholic clergy still cut off the balls of homosexual boys in the fifties of last century. Why is that if they themselves were gay too?
The homosexual clergy was the ultimate sinner and saw it as its task to persecute homosexuals outside the walls of the church as kind of penance.
And because they were sinners already, they meanwhile took their chance to rape young boys where possible:
To be a sinner is the ultimate goal of Christians and so homosexual practice became a kind of perpetual motion, a stimulus response chain which drove the Christian church: There is no forgiveness without sin. Christianity cannot exist without sin. And the most serious sin is homosexuality, the second God fighting the hegemony of the first.
Homosexual schizophrenia in Christianity
The Christian Church never saw Christianity as polytheistic but as monotheistic. Therefore, homosexuality is the greatest sin, also in Christianity. This, although they have a lot of gods: God, Jesus as his Son, Mary and a lot of holy others. So, homosexuality is a sin inherited from monotheism.
But then, why is the homosexual clergy leading the Church. That is because they are model sinners in Christianity. Without the existence of 'sin' Christianity has no meaning. Without the 'passion of Christ' this religion cannot exist:
Substitution of sexual roles
In Christianity, homosexuality fought the heterosexual God in disguise. The homosexual clergy submitted to a non existent God, the Alpha male, just a trace in the human brain. And so homosexuality, the second God became the first on Earth in the absence of the heterosexual God in the parallel universe. And Christians trusted their homosexual clergy, until women's suffrage.
- So, in Christianity the homosexual clergy has become the deputy of God on Earth, because mankind left the Alpha male behind in the animal kingdom:
This coup never happened in full polytheism:
In Christianity has occurred substitution of sexual roles. The first and second sexual role were exchanged. The reason is in semi-Christianity more sexual roles were the conscious than in monotheism.
On the other hand: The role of Jesus has supplanted God. That is why it is called Christianity.
The homosexual clergy was the ultimate sinner and saw it as its task to persecute homosexuals outside the walls of the church as kind of penance.
And because they were sinners already, they meanwhile took their chance to rape young boys where possible:
To be a sinner is the ultimate goal of Christians and so homosexual practice became a kind of perpetual motion, a stimulus response chain which drove the Christian church: There is no forgiveness without sin. Christianity cannot exist without sin. And the most serious sin is homosexuality, the second God fighting the hegemony of the first.
Homosexual schizophrenia in Christianity
Why are the homosexual clergy model sinners?
In monotheism of Islam, homosexuality is the greatest sin imaginable because it affects the omnipotence of the heterosexual Allah. But in semi-polytheism of Christianity, both sexual roles can exist as gods side by side in the conscious. But another form of homosexuality is suppressed in the subconscious. That is the weird essence of Christianity. Christianity is playing chess with sexual roles:
Semi-polytheism was an excellent opportunity for the homosexual clergy to take over the power from the Alpha male, which was just a trace in the brain inherited from the animal world. And so, it happened. The homosexual clergy pretended to perceive the tasks of God on Earth. But in fact it was a seizure of power and Christians tumbled in this coup with their eyes wide opened.
In monotheism of Islam, homosexuality is the greatest sin imaginable because it affects the omnipotence of the heterosexual Allah. But in semi-polytheism of Christianity, both sexual roles can exist as gods side by side in the conscious. But another form of homosexuality is suppressed in the subconscious. That is the weird essence of Christianity. Christianity is playing chess with sexual roles:
Semi-polytheism was an excellent opportunity for the homosexual clergy to take over the power from the Alpha male, which was just a trace in the brain inherited from the animal world. And so, it happened. The homosexual clergy pretended to perceive the tasks of God on Earth. But in fact it was a seizure of power and Christians tumbled in this coup with their eyes wide opened.
The Christian Church never saw Christianity as polytheistic but as monotheistic. Therefore, homosexuality is the greatest sin, also in Christianity. This, although they have a lot of gods: God, Jesus as his Son, Mary and a lot of holy others. So, homosexuality is a sin inherited from monotheism.
But then, why is the homosexual clergy leading the Church. That is because they are model sinners in Christianity. Without the existence of 'sin' Christianity has no meaning. Without the 'passion of Christ' this religion cannot exist:
Substitution of sexual roles
In Christianity, homosexuality fought the heterosexual God in disguise. The homosexual clergy submitted to a non existent God, the Alpha male, just a trace in the human brain. And so homosexuality, the second God became the first on Earth in the absence of the heterosexual God in the parallel universe. And Christians trusted their homosexual clergy, until women's suffrage.
- So, in Christianity the homosexual clergy has become the deputy of God on Earth, because mankind left the Alpha male behind in the animal kingdom:
On the other hand: The role of Jesus has supplanted God. That is why it is called Christianity.
So, what was impossible in Islam, happened in Christianity. Was this an accidental corollary of semi-polytheism? Definitely not, it was an imposed opportunity. This coup was only possible in semi-polytheism, in Christianity.
Christianity appears to be a strange mixture of monotheism and polytheism. This cannot be accidental. Homosexuality is the canary in the coalmine. Why is that? Because, somehow this weird religious construct was profitable for Christianity.
The holy grail of the homosexual clergy
Summarizing:
- Homosexuality is the second sexual role and in the absence of the Alpha male from the animal kingdom, Christianity automatically shifted from the second to the first role, and heterosexuality - without Alpha male - became the second god.
- But this did not happen in polytheism, so there must be a difference between polytheism and Christianity.
- Changing the order of sexual roles is only possible in (semi-)polytheism with more sexual roles in the conscious. We know, in monotheism of Islam there is no role for homosexuals in the conscious. This because in Islam there is only one heterosexual God: Allah. And now we understand the gay-problematic in Islam. They have no conscious role for homosexuals without declaring Allah obsolete...
Summarizing:
- Homosexuality is the second sexual role and in the absence of the Alpha male from the animal kingdom, Christianity automatically shifted from the second to the first role, and heterosexuality - without Alpha male - became the second god.
- But this did not happen in polytheism, so there must be a difference between polytheism and Christianity.
- Changing the order of sexual roles is only possible in (semi-)polytheism with more sexual roles in the conscious. We know, in monotheism of Islam there is no role for homosexuals in the conscious. This because in Islam there is only one heterosexual God: Allah. And now we understand the gay-problematic in Islam. They have no conscious role for homosexuals without declaring Allah obsolete...
- Without sin, without masochism there can be no Christianity. For, without sin Jesus has no role. So, a sinful person is a perfect Christian. That's why the homosexual clergy has such a prominent place in Christianity. Homosexuality is the most extreme sin for it threatens the monotheism of God.
- As real homosexuals the clergy was aroused by the chase on other homosexuals outside the church. It was a real lust for them. They developed a sadomasochistic strategy persecuting them, meanwhile being in a masochistic subordinate relationship to theirsadistic forgiving God. Being a Christian priest must have been a lustful experience.
- As sinners, the priests had to do penance and what would be better than persecuting other homosexuals and cut off their balls as punishment from God.
- The Catholic Church has been a real porn power house in history.
- And Islam is not any better:
- As real homosexuals the clergy was aroused by the chase on other homosexuals outside the church. It was a real lust for them. They developed a sadomasochistic strategy persecuting them, meanwhile being in a masochistic subordinate relationship to their
- As sinners, the priests had to do penance and what would be better than persecuting other homosexuals and cut off their balls as punishment from God.
- The Catholic Church has been a real porn power house in history.
- And Islam is not any better:
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment