Basic Dimension
First ancient fossil of Homo naledi child found in the Cradle of Humankind
By Ashley Strickland, CNN
Updated 2124 GMT (0524 HKT) November 4, 2021
Assumption 648:Homo sapiens makes the mistake of thinking that only humanoids with enlarged skulls began to ritually bury their dead for religious purposes. This is because their premise is wrong that an afterlife expectation is based on the assumption of the soul.And magical thinking requires a larger prefrontal cortex. And Homo naledi had no enlarged prefrontal cortex. So he had no religion. This is circular reasoning based on a wrong premise. All animals have religion. Magical thinking is by the way an enlarged prefrontal cortex disorder leading to psychosis in DSM-V.It means that what you want to be true is also true. So, God exists because you want it to be true. And if you don't get it, then remember that God can lift mountains, so it can. God lives in a parallel universe, because he could not have created himself, although in magical thinking of Homo erectus and Homo sapiens anything is possible, if you just believe in it. That was not the view of Homo naledi. He was not the crazy species to believe in the soul.So, the soul is not conditional for the belief in an afterlife. The soul is an inadmissible auxiliary hypothesis to perpetuate personal identity after death, which is based on no evidence. Homo naledi was a logical thinker with a small brain and averse to magical thinking that led to absurd assumptions as the soul.
He buried his dead in Dinaledi Chamber, because he believed they would be brought back to life by the God of Darkness. Well, that's tricky too. And it is not clear if they were really dead or in hibernation. And the problem was that because they had no soul, they could not choose their tribe of destiny after rebirth. That was a real problem for Homo naledi.Therefore, their entire religion was based on taking care of the fetuses. And that's why the cave entrance was also the exit to keep the fetuses under control. Which entrance should not be closed to fetuses leaving the Rising Star Cave. Closed graves are only possible in reincarnation, because the soul goes through walls.And that is also why no gifts and valuables were given to the dead. Because robbers could walk right through to the dead or sleeping. So, it was not the soul that descended into another body as with reincarnation, but a fetus with renewed telomeres became that other body, made from the deceased or hibernated person, called 'rebirth', more or less as resurrection in desert religions which, by the way, presuppose a soul.
Placing a child's skull in an absurd place with an insane difficulty has the meaning of communication, because it cannot be seen as a random act. Only the skull was placed on a ledge of 80cm height. In case of communication, the God of Darkness is a logical option.
BD: Starting hypothesis 2 (accepted):
A funeral can be a tribute to the deceased. But this partial burial doesn't seem very respectful. Did the child die in an accident or was it beheaded? The conclusion must therefore be that the deceased was not honored herself, but was used as a means of communication with an external entity, e.g. the God of Darkness.
BD: Starting hypothesis 3 (accepted):
By placing only the skull they possibly tried to display the person in his or her human entity, e.g. male or female, handsome or beautiful or whatever. In doing so, they concluded the body as irrelevant, which by the way, would indicate an already decent abstraction capacity of Homo naledi (2.3 Mya - 236 Ka; 550cc). Possibly, they were communicating to the God of Darkness about this specific person.
But the 'girl' could also be intended as a specimen of the species. Then we have a double abstraction here, the skull for the whole body and the specimen for the species. But then, Homo naledi was not as stupid as we thought.
If it was going so crescendo with Homo naledi, there was no reason to invoke God with a skull so conspicuously placed outside the group. So there likely was cause for concern. This may be due to the specific circumstances of this child. But the child may also be intended as a specimen. In that case, the skull might have been used to communicate an urgent request to God.
BD: Starting hypothesis 5 (accepted):
Homo naledi probably suffered from fertility stress, too few offspring. Therefore, the girl may have been sacrificed to the God of Darkness, for perpetual orgasm (from pedophilia). Of course not a boy and then we immediately deduce the God of Darkness as male. Kind of circular reasoning.
Like plants, God just needed some DNA to reconstruct the girl from the skull for private use. So they gave the skull so he could see what he got. That she would become attractive. That's just a hypothesis. Well, they would have killed the kid first.
BD: Starting hypothesis 6 (accepted):
If they took the skull for the body, they could think symbolically. That is their first abstraction. The second is to take the specimen for the species. And the third is brilliant. All life comes from the soil, including bipedal primates. The God of Darkness just had to activate the telomeres of DNA to create a rebirth that would be placed in the womb after intercourse. So, they weren't as stupid as we think. Then, the skull may indicate Rebirth from DNA by the God of Darkness, as well as communication with this God about fertility stress. And, by the way, Homo naledi needed no soul and no reincarnation, because he was not as psychotic as Homo sapiens.
BD: Starting hypothesis 7 (rejected):
The God of Darkness lived underground and didn't know what was going on up there. Perhaps they wanted to ask God for help because Homo erectus, in addition to robbing their wives to create Homo sapiens, had now also killed a child.
BD: Starting hypothesis 8 (accepted):
Placing the skull so far out of the group is a negative choice. Evidently the group did not meet its stated goal. The piling up of so many corpses may have led to distraction from the God of Darkness. That is the second negative conclusion. Therefore, Leti was placed before God very visible and recognizablein the hope that her mother would have such a girl again. So Leti meant doubt of Rebirth by the God of Darkness.
DINALEDI CHAMBER:
BD: Starting hypothesis 9 (accepted):
The Leti site is at the same elevation as Dinaledi Chamber after the Chute's lowering of 12 meters. So it's not that people looked for a deeper place to get closer to the God of Darkness. Then it is clear is that Leti was removed from the group for some other reason.
BD: Starting hypothesis 10 (accepted):
Did they stray from Dinaledi Chamber with Leti or was this a deliberate act? In the latter case, they must have regularly been to Dinaledi Chamber themselves to deliver corpses after 12 meters of descent - again with a rope. And that means bodies weren't always thrown through the Chute.
BD: Starting hypothesis 11 (accepted):
In both Neo and this child, it can be tentatively concluded that individuals were separated from the group, because of their status or because the group burial may not have lived up to expectations.
Both deceased are exclusively recommended to a third party. And that can only be the God of Darkness. One possibility is that Homo naledi did indeed have doubts about the system of burial in the Dinaledi chamber. They may have had increasing fertility stress while Dinaledi remained filled with corpses.
BD: Starting hypothesis 12 (accepted):
Neo and this child were separated from the group. Neo may have been an important figure, but Leti likely was not. She belonged to the group but had to remain identifiable. The intent may have been to bring this child forward before the God of Darkness, but not to reveal this preferential treatment to the rest of the tribe.
BD: Starting hypothesis 13 (accepted):
Another possibility is identifiability, because you can never prove from a pile of corpses whether God has made rebirths of them again. If you want to test this hypothesis, you have to keep the corpses separate and identifiable or count them.
Leti's remains: