(49) The Fatal Flaw of Islam

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 


Number Archive

Assumption 244: The fatal flaw in endogamous cultures is their inability to reject older concepts of eternal life. As a result concepts are confounded and heavily compromised in the interactions which give horrible and schizophrenic results.

Assumption 245: All misunderstandings within Islamic culture, all the atrocities, killings and looting, rapes, stoning and acid attacks are the result of schizophrenic interactions among competing concepts of eternal life that never should have been mixed.

Assumption 246: All Islamic atrocities can be explained by the three way interaction: 
Inbreeding X earthly reincarnation X parallel reincarnation.

Step 1: Inbreeding (Homininae (7 mya; 400 cc)
Step 2: Inbreeding X earthly reincarnation (Homo erectus (2 mya; 900 cc)
Islam: Inbreed. X earth reinc. X parall reinc. (Homo sapiens (200.000 ya; 1450 cc)

Abstractions of eternal life

Human religion developed out of animal religion under two conditions. First condition is the increasing level of abstraction of 'eternal life'. Second is 'operational conditioning' as a learning method:

Assumption 4: Human religion is the search for eternal life.

Regarding the evolution of human religion we distinguish three abstractions of eternal life of increasing difficulty:

1: Genetic immortality by inbreeding and incest (Homininae, 7-2 mya, 400 cc)

2: Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe (Homo erectus, 2 mya, 900 cc)

3: Reincarnation into the parallel universe (Homo sapiens, 0.2 mya, 1450 cc)

Assumption 180: Abraham and heaven. There is no heaven called in Genesis other than as ceiling of the earth. Also there is no mention of reincarnation into the earthly or in the parallel universe. And there is no evidence that Abraham, Isaac or God ever existed. But we do know the evolution of human religion follows logical laws. What means the level of abstraction of eternal life determines human religious development. Therefore, we interpret the myth of Abraham at best as the transition from earthly reincarnation to reincarnation into the parallel universe. The parallel universe is the final abstraction of eternal existence discovered by man.

Levels of eternal life

Remarkably the first level of eternal survival was not yet abstract but very concrete. This because saturated inbreeding lead to a better genetic mirror of the parents in the offspring. Genetic immortality was the first way of eternal life, though parents died. Forget about autosomal recessive disorders for the moment.

Factually, inherited abnormalities in children reminded of the grandparents. Thus Homo erectus got the idea of reincarnation from his offspring, alongside another reason for reincarnation into the lively remembrance and spiritual survival of ancestors, the first stage of religion of elephants.

Genetic immortality was the primary reinforcer of inbreeding. But with reincarnation ancestors stayed alive; hence reincarnation into the (earthly) universe supplanted genetic immortality as a secondary reinforcer:

Operant response: inbreeding

Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring

Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe

Therefore, since Homo erectus (2 mya, 900 cc), inbreeding no longer served for the genetic mirror of parents in the offspring, but only to create inbred bodies in which ancestors could reincarnate. This is the prototype of tribal endogamy, which still can be observed in Europe in the honor killings of Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim, who refused forced marriages with their cousins: 

Hence, since two million years the inbreeding instinct of Paradise culture is linked to earthly reincarnation of fathers, who sometimes are frustrated by unwilling daughters, which refuse forced marriages with their cousins.

But now the problems:

In the third phase Homo sapiens discovered the parallel universe. Now tribal males got the promise of 72 fresh and exogamic women slaves from unknown tribes in heaven. This, because reincarnation into the own tribe with the same boring sisters and cousins was more a curse than a promise:

Assumption 178: Endogamous cultures are chained to inbreeding and incest in the earthly universe. The parallel universe offers them the illusion of an exogamous culture with sexual freedom and genetic diversity. For men, 72 wild virgins are the reward for a lifelong of sexual suffering from the unbearable dullness of their cousins. And for women it is the reward for a lifetime of sacrifice and fighting against their inherited instinct for genetic diversity. In heaven women will be redeemed from their endogamous chains. The confounded and contaminated projection (perpetual orgasm) of sadomasochism (monotheism) in an originally desexualized parallel universe is the religious opium for inbreeding cultures.

Assumption 157: The balance of power between earthly and parallel reincarnation is determined by the beauty of women. Smaller tribes give a smaller choice of attractive women. Hence, smaller tribes cause a greater desire for the parallel universe. What means that tribal endogamy in rural areas leads to a greater demand for the parallel universe than ethnic and religious endogamy, in which the variety of attractive women increases enormously. In religious endogamous populations, earthly reincarnation again is preferable to parallel reincarnation because earthly reincarnation is the prevailing instinct. But in exogamous populations with absolute genetic diversity, yearning for eternal orgasm in the afterlife will not occur.

Rejection of former concepts of eternal life

Exogamous cultures:

Pay attention to what happened in evolution. With every new abstraction, exogamic cultures - that would later espouse Christianity - rejected previous concepts of eternal life:

1: Upon the discovery of reincarnation into the (earthly) universe by Homo erectus (2 mya, 900 cc) a lot of tribes renounced inbreeding and incest what was replaced with exogamy. They married women from other tribes and reincarnated into animals. Therefore the inbreeding instinct diluted and since long has been disappeared in Western society.

2: And below you see the change from earthly to parallel reincarnation, 
in which again Christianity rejected the inbreeding and incest culture of paradise ànd earthly reincarnation, what was replaced in an orthogonal projection by reincarnation into the parallel universe combined with the totally new concept of the 'Fall of Man'. A perpendicular projection from one plain on the other is not possible:

This means exogamous cultures but always possessed one concept of eternal life. Hence, exogamies are flexible cultures, continuously innovating concepts and society.

Endogamous cultures:

But endogamous cultures like Paradise culture that was merged seamlessly into Islam, were unable to distance themselves from previous abstractions. 

An endogamy can be maintained only through oppression of women. That's because women naturally opt for genetic diversity. Men who opt for sexual monoculture suffer from mental illness. And so the battle between endogamy and exogamy, between husband and wife became the basis of human religion.

1: In endogamous cultures, inbreeding and incest remained. Quite understandable because there is no crossing out of this instinct within closed endogamies. 

2: Also earthly reincarnation remained but was suppressed in the unconscious. In today's Muslim cultures only inbreeding and incest are visible.

Assumption 18: The dilemma presented to Abraham was not so much the choice between polytheism and monotheism, between earthly idols and the only God in the parallel universe, but between primary and secondary reincarnation, between reincarnation into the (earthly) universe and heaven of the parallel universe. Because, who can arrange his own reincarnation has absolute power over the afterlife and does not need the parallel universe of monotheism any longer.

Both, reincarnation into the offspring by inbreeding and incest and reincarnation into earthly living beings undermined the power of monotheism, what's only weapon was reincarnation into the parallel universe.

But monotheism was wise and realized that tribal cultures easier abandoned reincarnation into animals than that they gave up their instinct of inbreeding.

By killing his only tribal begotten (!) son, Abraham indeed would cut off reincarnation into earthly descendants, but he would not lose his faith in earthly tribal gods.

That’s because we assume that inbreeding is an instinct in endogamous cultures. Hence, the external projection of the patriarch as a God himself would be destroyed by the kill of his only son, but his internal projection on continued tribal existence remained intact. Just to say that you can’t tell a tribal head (a Muslim male) that his inbreeding instinct does not exist any longer.

The same applies to the prohibition of idols (animals). External projections of gods (statues) can be forbidden, but internal representations remain. Therefore one cannot change a multi-dimensional god-space into a single dimension with a pen-stroke. Neither polytheism, nor earthly reincarnation could be removed by monotheism.

Thousands of years later, this estimation error of monotheism resulted in a ban on earthly reincarnation by Islam. As a result, Muslims lost every connection between inbreeding and reincarnation. 

3: At first glance inbreeding is chained to the 'honor of the family'. But which culture slaughters its women for the honor of the family? It proves Muslims don't really know what they are doing. But in a sense they are right: killing renegade women has something to do with the tribe.

4: For Muslims, chaining inbreeding and incest to the parallel universe is impossible. They only know this is an old custom from a previous religion. But the real connection between inbreeding and earthly reincarnation is suppressed on pain of death. But precisely that causes horrible interactions between earthly and parallel reincarnation as will be shown.

And so schizophrenia of Islam arose precisely in the interactions among the three forms of eternal survival. Below you see oblique projections, which mean all types of eternal life are intertwined in bizarre ways. Perpendicular projections from one plain on the other are very well possible, hence they are correlated and meaningful connected:

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.  

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality

Assumption 181: The actual sadistic god of Islamic culture is not Allah but are tribal gods from Paradise culture. In the beginning Allah was intended as an escape from male sadism just like Christianity. This worked through Jesus in exogamous cultures, but failed due to endogamy among Muslims:

Allah, the women god from the SUPER EGO and tribal gods of the ID were contaminated and clashed on the level playing field of the EGO of Muslims.

What now is seen as Allah in the Koran and Sharia is a failed women god, which has been occupied by men. Hence Islam psychologically knows a male Allah who is dominant and a female Allah who describes the inner life of women. 

This all because in monotheism there can be only one God. Allah must be understood as a multiple personality in Islamic culture. This is the cause of the sexual imbalance between man and wife: SM-dyad.

(skip)

Assumption 77: Because the God of monotheism is defined as a known but unknown parameter (angle) of His Principal Axis in the space of (tribal) gods, the system of equations of paradise culture actually seemed unresolved.
Nevertheless the n-space of tribes was reduced to a by tribal heads accepted single dimension: monotheism. Knowing that hatred and hostility is the most common factor among Bedouin tribes, God and Allah must be based also on hatred and hostility. Hence, God and Allah are personifications of Sadism on the throne, and the real nature of monotheism must be sadomasochism."

(skip)

Assumption 76: Consider the polytheistic set of n tribal heads in paradise culture as an overdetermined set of n-equations in the space of gods, which has to be caught by a single principal component: the assumed factor of sadomasochism. The angle to this main axis has to be given by the God of monotheism (m=1), who by definition is a known but unknown parameter, because God is defined as not to know. What means that this invisible God, the proposed principal binding factor among all those tribes, is agreed not to be known in an also unknown universe. What means that God gives a fake angle to the SM-dyad in space. But then it may be more parsimonious to define the power dimension of human sexual space directly as sadomasochism and to forget about 'God'.

(skip)

Assumption 68: In humans, the number of dependent gods (n) in the polytheistic space of gods (rank = m = 5 vectors) in the archetype of God (rank = p = 5 factors) is naturally unlimited, with the SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) (p = 1). 

SM-dyad is called 'monotheism' otherwise. With male testosterone this space will be gradually restricted to only one conscious dimension (p = 1), the SM-dyad or Allah-construct, named otherwise monotheism or sadomasochism. 

Interactions of eternal life: 

                                                                              

Note, the religious formula of Islam has most interactions:        

      

Example of a schizophrenic interaction among three kinds of reincarnation

The killer who loves his daughter dearly

- Now, because of his unknown wish to reincarnate in the (earthly) universe, the father puts pressure on his daughter to inbreed with her cousin for 'the honor of the family'. The latter is because he does not know how to connect inbreeding with Allah in the parallel universe.

Refusal arranged marriage:

The father consciously wants to come into heaven of the parallel universe. But inbreeding has no logical link with the parallel universe. Unconsciously he still strives to reincarnation into the earthly universe. But there is no natural relation between inbreeding and reincarnation at all. What means all his motives to press his daughter to a forced marriage with her cousin is in fact pure nonsense. And 'the honor of the family' is a rehash of what really matters: his self-projection as a tribal god in the afterlife. He is the result of an interaction of religious indoctrination and an inbred population.

Earlier we concluded Muslim fathers are not allowed to worship themselves as tribal gods and to believe in earthly reincarnation. That’s why inbreeding is not propagated in the Koran.

Cognitive dissonance between conscious and unconscious

Muslims suppress their intense desire for reincarnation into the (earthly) universe since 1400 years. Polytheism (tribal gods and idols) are forbidden on pain of death. Now, how would Allah possibly know of this hidden drive, where Muslims don’t even know by themselves consciously? 

In the present scenario, conflicts are created in the conscious of the Muslim male, but the whole conflict of dissonance can easily be transferred to the unconscious. Then the father 'knows nothing' about it.

Immanent Allah sees everything. But only when Muslims themselves realize the reason of their inbreeding instinct (earthly reincarnation), they will come into panic. That’s the theory.

Now we found the critical turning point in honor killings. That’s when the father realizes that inbreeding has to do with his deepest wish for reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. Then he understands that the immanent Allah has seen and heard everything. Then he is ashamed of his mortal sin and thinks he might burn in hell for ever. He must do penance to avoid hell and yet earn his virgins in heaven.

From that moment he will panic in a transient psychosis and work on a plan for the gruesome killing of his own daughter.

If the theory is right it is here that women must be warned. They must never argue with their father and pierce the real reason for inbreeding into his mind. Cognitive dissonance can arise immediately. Fathers might panic and get a nervous breakdown. They may collapse in a transient psychosis and kill their daughters.

Therefore cognitive dissonance is a contradiction of interests, of the unconscious earthly reincarnation as a tribal god and the conscious parallel reincarnation into heaven of Allah, a contrast between Paradise culture in the unconscious and secondary Islam in the conscious.

The more I love my daughter the more gruesome her killing

Immanent Allah sees everything and perceives the sinister motives of the father. Reincarnation into the universe is a mortal sin. The father has sinned. Now Allah must be very angry, where upon the father calculates his chances on eternal life. He already can forget earthly reincarnation with this unwilling daughter, but now he must fear also losing heaven in the parallel universe. He must do penance for Allah to come into heaven anyway. Without penance he would burn in hell forever.

Assumption 111: An honor killing can be seen as a human sacrifice, by which the father desperately confirms his belief in the parallel universe of Allah. By killing his daughter he makes earthly reincarnation impossible (Myth of Abraham).

Note that a sinister moment of 'calm before the storm' occurs, where the daughter thinks her father has abandoned the idea of the arranged marriage. This is seen correctly because he realized he must kill his daughter in the name of Allah. After some period of silence he will set a trap and invite her to restore family ties. This fatal moment occurred in the cases of Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim.

Now because he loves his daughter dearly the penance must look real. He cannot strangle her with a pillow because then she would not be hurt. That’s no penance. Then yet he will burn in hell. No, it is he who must feel and show real suffering. 

Hence the more he loves her, the more violent the kill must be. Of course his beloved daughter must show also sincere suffering. So he thinks he has to slaughter her in the most brutal and gruesome way.

Correcting cognitive dissonance

Now, after having paid the highest price on earth that a loving father can pay, he corrected for cognitive dissonance and certainly will deserve the kingdom of heaven.

Is this a crazy theory? Yes, of course it is, but millions of honor killings in history ask for crazy theories. In this theory we correlated father love with degree of violence. The more intense the love for his daughter, the more gruesome her killing must be. It is just one of many conceivable scenarios.

We think those killers do not have a heart. Might be correct, but sometimes we can be wrong. Cognitive dissonance could be an intervening variable, installed by Islamic culture. It definitely must be culture, for honor killings always and massively happen in endogamic cultures. 

Hence, we also need to develop a working model for Muslim fathers with a huge bond with their daughters. This all means already in pre-puberty relations between daughters and fathers should be loosened. Obscene interest in the reproductive organs of daughters must be punished with immediate eviction from home of the daughter, by law and by force.

ADDENDUM:

(73) The Sexual Theory of Religion  (Part 1: 1-59)
(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)
(75) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 3: 120-400)
(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 400-600)

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

(48) Federica Mogherini's lustful submission to Chrislam

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federica_Mogherini

Federica Mogherini (born 16 June 1973) is an Italian politician and the current High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission in the Juncker Commission since 1 November 2014.

Mogherini was Italy's Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation from 21 February 2014 until 31 October 2014 in the centre-left Cabinet of Matteo Renzi.
She is a member of the Italian Democratic Party and the Party of European Socialists.

Mogherini attended the Sapienza University of Rome where she studied Political Science graduating with a Diploma in Political Philosophy with a thesis entitled "Relationship between religion and politics in Islam", which she wrote whilst on the Erasmus programme at Aix-en-Provence, France.

A member of the Italian Communist Youth Federation from 1988, in 1996 Mogherini joined the Youth Left after the dissolution of the Italian Communist Party before its transformation into a social democratic party.

Mogherini married Matteo Rebesani; they have two daughters.



THE COUP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

No director of the EU-government is democratically elected and political machinations therefore can be grasped from successively installed politicians.

José Manuel Barroso is a true communist and was president of the European Commission from June 29, 2004 to November 1, 2014, after which he was succeeded by Jean-Claude Juncker, a representative of Christianity. So the Presidency of the European Commission changed from communism (exogamy) to Christianity (endogamy).

Herman Van Rompuy is a Catholic and Jesuit and was President of the European Council from January 1, 2010 to November 30, 2014, in the media referred to as the 'President of Europe'. Donald Franciszek Tusk is a Polish liberal, who succeeded Van Rompuy. So the Presidency of the European Council changed from Christianity (endogamy) to liberalism (exogamy).

Catherine Ashton of the British Labour Party (exogamy) was High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy from December 1, 2009 to November 1, 2014. Federica Mogherini is her successor (exogamy ànd endogamy).

The ultimate endogamous goal of the Union (its religion) is the elimination of the nation states in favor of a newly formed cultural heart of Europe.

In utter naivety Marxist nihilists like Barroso and Ashton believed - as in the sixties with the "march through the institutions" - that after the destruction of the endogamous cores of nation states a new European heart would arise automatically.

But nothing was further from the truth and that's why Van Rompuy's drabness and Barroso's mental emptiness were replaced by the qualities of Federica Mogherini, who was given a free role as libero in foreign affairs to search for a new heart for Europe, called 'Chrislam'.

All that's left of endogamous bonding is the axis Juncker - Mogherini: Christianity - Islam. Together they will decide which endogamous heart will replace the cultures of the nation states. Under the paternal coaching of Christian Democrat Juncker, most charming Federica Mogherini will lead the Union to the slaughter by Chrislam.

Federica Mogherini

We are not interested in the person of Ms. Mogherini itself, but in the female representative of Marxist nihilism, now ruining European endogamic cores, the cultures of the nation states, replacing them with Islam:

The Islamic invasion in Western Europe can be considered from a sexual perspective, of which 'religion' is only a manifestation:

Because of this dissenting view, some key concepts will first be made clear:



The Sexual Theory of Religion

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.

Assumption 196: The measure of religion is group permeability seen in integration, assimilation and segregation:

After having clarified some basic elements of our religious model, we also cast 'racism' in this mold:



The development of racism

Assumption 240: The development of racism.

1: In the animal world groups accept only members of the same kind so they can propagate. Hence, a group of gorillas will not accept a female chimp. This is discrimination between species. Later in the evolution, another form of discrimination emerged, but now as discrimination within species, called racism.

2: Though all kinds of Homininae (7 mya; 400 cc) possibly were of the same species, they already started to select their own kind, their own race. Their group identity drifted away from pure physical propagation into the religious propagation of tribal identity (religion). So they were not interested in pure propagation with other Homininae races any longer, but more in maintaining feelings of tribal identity. And the only way to control for tribal belongingness was race, not culture. So Homininae already selected on external racial characteristics. 

3: Much later racism must have been strengthened further through reincarnation into the tribe (Homo erectus; 2 mya, 900 cc). For, only by pure inbred bodies of descendants, ancestors could reincarnate into the tribe. Concluding, real racism started with the Homininae (400 cc; 7 mya) and was strengthened by Homo erectus (900 cc; 2 mya).

4: Homo sapiens (1400 cc; 200.000 ya) developed bigger tribes and bigger cultures. Still tribal belongingness (religion) was seen from the racial appearance of foreigners. The same with the period of ethnic endogamy. Only later in religious endogamy, factual religion (Islam, Christianity) really became more important than race. For example, today the religious endogamic outer layer of Islam is not filled with Arabs any longer but with a billion people of other races. 

Yet we judge Islam as a completely racist culture because it distinguishes between human beings like the Nazis: It oppresses 'other sexual roles'.

5: Concluding: in the evolution preserving genes of groups has been changed to preserving religion within human tribes. 

6: But because selective breeding cultures like Islam imply strong interactions between ethnicity and culture, racial appearance still effectively triggers cultural discrimination.                                                            

Therefore, also in the modern world racism continues to be a simple and effective mechanism to distinguish between persons from different cultures. Obviously, this results in many errors of judgment.                                                              

Next, we apply the sexual theory of religion to the interaction between Christianity and Islam:



Dynamics between Islam and Christianity

It is implied by our sexual philosophy of human religion Christianity is involved in a deadly sexual embrace with Islam:





Ms. Mogherini's political ideas are a perfect illustration of this theory:

Christianity is actively seeking for a masochistic relation with passive sadistic Islam. 

 Assumption 283: Policor.

Policor is a worldwide movement to undermine Western culture. Nowadays representatives are the EU, the globalists and the Democratic Party of the United States. Policor started with Romanticism (Rousseau) as built-in movement of the Enlightenment. The latter failed to formulate rules to discriminate between cultures, on which Romanticism judged all cultures equal and equivalent. In fact, the Enlightenment gave the impulse to the destruction of Christianity. In the twentieth century the Frankfurter Schule proclaimed the destruction of Western culture, followed by Marxist relativism or - nihilism. Later on 'all cultures are equal and equivalent' culminated into multiculturalism. The underlying idea was to establish a world government of globalists which could benefit from an army of cheap laborers (deplorables, irredeemables). Hillary Clinton is the latest representative of American policor. To accelerate the destruction of Western culture the EU destroyed the Nation States of Europe and negated democracy. Eurocrats call democracy: 'populism'. A further goal is to set up refugee flows to erase the identity of the European culture. Policor attracts criminals, fraud and corruption and consists of sexual deviant groups which find in Islam a shining example.

Martien Pennings wrote a splendid but harsh psychological analysis about Ms. Mogherini, from which we only highlight some elements to illustrate our case:

Federica Mogherini will change Europe into an Islamic hell

https://martienpennings.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/federica-mogherini-will-change-europe-into-an-islamic-hell/

https://martienpennings.wordpress.com/2015/07/27/federica-mogherini-zal-europa-in-een-islamitische-hel-veranderen/


Federica Mogherini is presented as a mere representative of Marxist nihilism, aiming to destroy the cultures of the nation states. Just like the EU she has the absurd illusion a new homogeneous European culture of laborers will be created automatically, dominated by a new endogamic core:






Now it is absolutely clear Ms. Mogherini has Islam in mind as our new European predominant endogamous culture:

In his article Pennings refers to two concentric circles, which we recognize as the endogamous and exogamous forces within mammal groups:


“( . . .) Islam is a systematized obsession with sexuality, with what people have between their legs. That Islamic “culture” consists of two concentric circles of repression: in the outer circle all men suppress all women and in the inner circle a male elite suppresses socially weaker men. The game is about the possession of women – about sex in the first place, as always and everywhere – and about wealth and power. Islam is an empty, harsh system in which baffling blockheads, cynical murderers, hypocritical bastards and sex addicted pedophiles set the tone. Islam is an already 1,400-year ongoing slow Holocaust in which besides the Jew the woman also plays the role of Jew.”

Federica Mogherini

Mogherini's basic statement about Islam is as follows:

“Islam holds a place in our Western societies. Islam belongs in Europe. It holds a place in Europe’s history, in our culture, in our food and – what matters most – in Europe’s present and future. Like it or not, this is the reality. ( . . .) With the European project, after World War II, not only we accepted diversity: we expressed a Desire for diversity to be a core feature of our Union.”

“We need to show some humble respect for diversity. Diversity is the core feature of our European history, and it is our strength. ( . . .) For this reason I am not afraid to say that political Islam should be part of the picture.”


'Like it or not, this is the reality.'





Firstly, note how Ms. Mogherini portrays Muslim mass immigration as a fait accompli, where we demonstrated earlier how Marxist nihilism has given rise to and partly caused this demographic disaster:


Cultural Marxism cut out the endogamous heart of Europe:





Secondly, Ms. Mogherini incidentally makes a perfect analysis of European culture:





Indeed because the desire for diversity can be seen as the primal trait of genetic diversity of European peoples, manifested earlier in imperialism and colonialism.





It's what we call the complete permeability of the exogamous mantle of European culture: 

But now, because it is no longer possible to export this imperial lust to the colonies, Europe has no other choice than to import genetic diversity from abroad.

But how come the exogamous lust of European nations broke loose apparently without control? That is not an inevitable process as Ms. Mogherini wants us to believe, but is the fault of the Marxist nihilism.




The march through the institutions

The Frankfurter Schule was a cultural Marxist movement aiming to destroy the endogamous core of Western culture, especially Christianity. 
This destruction was necessary to build international socialism in Western society. Their intent was depillarization or deconfessionalization.

In the sixties of the last century nihilistic Marxism started 'the march through the institutions' to overthrow the established order. They succeeded, but instead of setting cultural Marxism as a new endogamic core:

they created nothing new, namely cultural relativism in the mantle. Look how gorgeous they brought Western culture to its multidimensional disruption, however without the promised renewal, simply because they did not understand to be nothing more than an instrument to destruction of this exogamous culture:

Actually the march cut out the heart of Western culture and destroyed the second god: the endogamous homosexual clergy: 

Depillarization resulted into cultural nihilism and cultural relativism. Western culture without its endogamous Christian heart was unprecedented and collapsed into puberty. Now it had to stand on its own as a teenager.

Marxism offered not the slightest endogamous depth and has not been able to replace Christianity. Western culture never realized how much it has been uprooted as a group without Christianity and policor was rudderless searching for a new identity.





Enlightenment and Christianity

In the eighteenth century the Western world has chosen for the Enlightenment of 

Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. And in a lengthy process of ages the Enlightenment got more and more influence on the endogamous heart at the expense of the sadistic Christian church:

But what really happened in the twentieth century was Marxists expelled the Christian church from the center of power in the Netherlands. Only the Enlightenment remained in the endogamous core. But now Western culture was in big trouble:

Federica Mogherini:

“Inclusiveness can be the key to our success – both when we talk foreign policy and when we deal with our home affairs. ( . . .) We need to pass a cultural message, to lay the basis for our political message: any attempt to divide the peoples of Europe into ‘us’ and ‘them’ brings us in the wrong direction. The migrants and us. The Muslims and us. The Jews and us, as anti-Semitism has not been defeated at all The ‘other’ and us. We learnt from our history that we all are someone else’s ‘other’. The fear of the other can only lead us to new conflicts.”


In Marxist nihilism the ideological distinction between cultures disappeared, after which the T- cells turned against all kinds of racist movements: 

But 'no discrimination among cultures' automatically means losing itself as a group, as a cultural entity. Better replace Christianity by a new endogamous core to protect European culture against Islamic terror. Time is running out...

As said with the expulsion of the authoritarian Christian church immediately we see the problem of the Western group of higher mammals in the last century. This is because they placed the exogamous mantle into their endogamous core. Now they had chosen Jesus in the mantle AND in the core:

Choosing 'all people are equivalent' as the new endogamic core, coming from Enlightenment, has been an extremely dangerous mistake, because now tension between the core and the mantle was gone:

Assumption 207: In a healthy group, there exists a tension between the endogamous core and the exogamous mantle. If one of them is missing the culture must be sick. Seen in evolutionary perspective, Western culture lacks its endogamous heart and Islamic culture has no exogamous mantle, hence both must be regarded as religious cultures on the verge of extinction.

The core lost its power over the mantle and the group of higher mammals degenerated to an uncontrolled collection of atheistic individuals eager for promiscuous genetic diversity: 

And exactly that happened after Western culture expelled the Christian church from its endogamous core and that's why Europe fell prey to the super sadism of Islam.

With the march through the institutions, at that historical moment, policor extradited Christianity to Islam, which became the new endogamous heart of Western culture.

But think about it, authoritarian Christianity was completed and rejected, only Islam had the power to save the Western exogamous shell from a total collapse. So it was felt unconsciously.

What means the greedily gobbling of the atrocities of Islam was no expression of cultural relativism or multiculturalism, but rather a desperate return to the laws of the group, which prescribe a forced interaction between the lost endogamous core and its exogamous mantle:

So, the basic error in Western culture is a wrong interpretation of the teachings of Jesus: 'Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself'. This only works in completely exogamous cultures, where people respect each other in equivalence: the principle of mutuality:






Unfortunately, nowadays Christians (policor) are sick masochistic believers subjecting themselves with the ass up to every sadistic ruler (Islam) sent by God.

Matthew 5:44
King James Bible Jesus:
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Full exogamy completely freed almost all sexual roles from the sexual dictatorship of monotheism, and plunged the semi-polytheistic Christianity into the atheistic polytheism of BDSM. And Muslims were right, because for them Western culture changed into Sodom and Gomorrah which desperately needed a new endogamic heart.

The rise of Policor

In the Netherlands, Article 1 of the constitution came into effect in 1983. 
In this new law Policor (Political Correctness: former left wing Christians but now Marxist communists) protected Islam - known as the world's most discriminating religion - against religious discrimination. Muslims were allowed to slaughter their daughters in our backyard:

Policor unconsciously knew the only endogamous force able to replace Christianity was the even stronger sadistic Islam. 





For that reason, Western culture imported Islam massively in the fourth quarter of the last century:

Assumption 243: The cause of Chrislam:
On the sexual dimension Christianity always is a weaker religion than Islam, because the homosexual clergy of Christianity is only the second God of the animal world, arrogantly representing itself as deputy of the first on earth. As we know the first God is the masculine and polygamous heterosexual Alpha male who was left behind in the animal world. Of course Muslim males will reject homosexuality as their God. They still worship inbreeding and incest of the Alpha male and that's why Islam will always win from Christianity. Moreover, Christianity is nothing more than the masochistic counterpart of sadistic Islam. Hence, on the instinctive dimension, the SM-dyad will always defeat Vanilla-dyad. That's because the latter is only prosthesis for the real sexual instinct. Therefore we see the murder of Marxist nihilism on the homosexual clergy of Christianity automatically created a vacuum for the heterosexual God of Islam. Marxism nihilism accidentally created Chrislam.

Unaware of looking for a new religious endogamous core, policor suggested every effort to capture the endogamous heart of Islam. But they really thought they treated Islam the same as other religions under their multicultural exogamous mantle.

And so, as alleged multiculturalism, Islamic absolutism was imported right into the heart of Western culture. For in that era, choosing authoritarian absolutism (of Islam) was at odds with the prevailing cultural flow of total democracy and relativism.

And that's why multiculturalism unwittingly turned into the masochistic squirm with ass up for a gruesome and sadistic Islamic ruler. 

This sadistic tyrant was absolutely needed to let our masochistic culture retrieve its counterweight. This is because two points are needed to draw a straight line. 

Determinatio negatio est (Spinoza 1647). Determination is negation. In order to be determined, in order to exist as a particular entity, it is necessary to ignore the opposite. So, existence is to deny the opposite. Everything that exists in the world (masochism) requires for its existence also the existence of its opposite (sadism). The direction in space of masochism is determined by sadism as the line between two points.

Islam occupied the empty place of the homosexual clergy to peace and salvation of policor, who sacrificed the empty shell of exogamous Western culture to a sadistic mass murderer.

But a major determinant of the emergence of Chrislam is women's emancipation in Western culture. Because it was women, who instinctively did not acknowledge sexual superiority of the homosexual clergy:

Assumption 246: In the exogamous mantle (sexuality) of Christianity, women project themselves in Jesus as personification of 'other sexual roles', which includes male homosexuality as a second God. But in nature, women have an anti-projection on the endogamous core (religion), on the first sexual God, well known as male heterosexuality. That follows SM-dyad. But in current sick religion of Christianity homosexuality plays a major role, both in the endogamous core (homosexual clergy) as in the exogamous mantle (Jesus), making Christianity fall under Vanilla-dyad. But the latter is only prosthesis on the sexual instinct and women have no instinctive relation with male homosexuality. Which means in evolution Christianity will return to SM-dyad, to Chrislam and women's emancipation will drag sadistic Allah into Europe.

The travesty of the Schengen agreement

Because the core disappeared in Western society, it dissolves in atheism and individualism. There is no group any more:

Western culture is like a faded flower falling apart just as the Roman Empire. What was already evident by the elimination of all borders by the Schengen agreement.
Schengen writes the necrology of European culture. This is the end stage of exogamy, complete permeability of the mammal group. Now the body will be killed by an invasion of parasites and by a flow of fortune seekers from all directions which engulf Europe, helped by the insane bombardments on Muslim states by NATO:






Once European culture has bled to death it will be overrun by Islamic hordes:

This is the end stage of exogamy, complete permeability of a mammal group:

Schengen writes the necrology of European culture.

Western culture, too long profited of Christianity and meanwhile forgot to formulate an exogamic core more realistic than the Enlightenment. That's the real Dutch tragedy of the last 50 years.

For Western culture, it seems the only way to regain power and to rebuild its culture is a new endogamous core that distinguishes between people. But that is anathema to the Enlightenment and comes down to 'racism'. Hence, as long as the Enlightenment is the current endogamous core this will not happen. That's the dilemma of Western society. Because of this impasse civil war seems inevitable.

That's why Geert Wilders has to fight Islamic culture instead of Muslims. So, there is only one hypothetical wormhole through which the exogamous Western culture can escape and not to be slaughtered by the endogamous core of Islamic hatred.  

But of course, this is dancing on the edge of the volcano. There only needs to be done little to address the aggression against Muslims themselves, because this difference is only artificially applied to formulate a wormhole in Enlightenment to the rescue of Western culture. 

This is artificially, because a strong interaction exists between ethnicity and culture especially in selective breeding cultures.

So, Western society brought itself into real trouble and will not overcome this Gordian knot without violence.

    Spartacus (Timon Dias): Christendom, Verlichting en Romantiek:

    http://www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven/2015/06/gsessay_europese_identiteit.html



EU foreign policy chief to tears because of Brussels

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini has to interrupt a press conference Tuesday in Jordan because she became sad when she talked about the attacks in Brussels.


Belgians mourn and help on social media

Many Belgians Tuesday searched social media to inform themselves and to pour out their hearts about the attacks in Brussels. Also offered help in all possible ways.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-07/eu-courts-arab-league

Mogherini, who participated at the Tunis summit, apparently had more pressing priorities. Prefacing her speech with words that were meant to give the expression that the EU and the Arab League are almost like two sides of the same coin, she said: "We are so geographically and culturally close, and we face so many common challenges, and we have so many opportunities to work together".
In her speech, she mentioned that Europe and the Arab League have four priorities -- none of them included the issue of human rights in the region. Nor did those priorities include the smallest reference to all the problems with which Europe is struggling -- migration from the Arab world, terrorism and extremism imported from the Arab world, which is directly affecting the physical security of Europeans. Instead, Mogherini said, "The first point, the first top issue on our respective agenda: Israel and Palestine. We need to continue to work together very closely, because we share the same sense of priority, the same sense of urgency, the same concerns and the same objectives: to get back to meaningful negotiations towards the two-state solution, which is the only viable, realistic solution".
Mogherini did, however, place great emphasis on the following, "One issue on which I believe it is crucial that Arabs and Europeans work together very closely: we need to preserve diversity in our societies. We need to prevent the rise of hate, starting with preventing Islamophobia in our societies. We need to work together to make sure that in all our countries, no one excluded in Europe as in the Arab world, everyone is accepted, protected and respected as a human being, whatever his or her background is, whatever religious belief, gender, age, identity. We value diversity and we believe that everyone needs to find his and her place in our societies. So we have a joint interest and a joint responsibility to nourish and preserve diversity and together with that the dignity of every single human being".
Perhaps, before Mogherini spoke of preserving diversity, she should have addressed the concerns expressed by the International Commission of Jurists on the human rights violations of the region and its lack of basic human freedoms and diversity of religion, speech, identity and gender. Mogherini, however, chose to keep silent.

Instead, Mogherini's words came across as references to the EU's own continued efforts to monitor and police free speech and thus, gradually, to extinguish any kind of diversity of opinion within the EU.

Exerpt from:

(295) Omvolking is the battle between subspecies of Homo sapiens 

The Omvolking Theory:

There is just one main factor responsible for Omvolking: 
Husband-wife relationship (SM-dyad versus Vanilla-dyad). 
SM-Dyad is a sexual instinct formed by Australopithecus. 
Vanilla-dyad is a cultural entity.

This factor can be split into two sub dimensions: 
1: Equivalent sexual roles (monotheism versus polytheism) and 
2: the femininity factor (caused by women's suffrage). 
These two sub dimensions interact strongly:

Below, we see women's suffrage after the sixties of former century first led to Vanilla-dyad (1980) as expression of equal sexual rights, but later caused sexual dissatisfaction and the unconscious yearning to SM-dyad (strong):

Then, the religious component shows the change of old Christianity (semi polytheism) into Political Correctness (polytheism), in which PC erroneously thinks that eliminating God from the central core means giving up religion:

But religion does not necessarily need a central God, a central sexual role at all (male heterosexuality) to be religion. Now PC replaced Christianity with 'all sexual roles' in the centre and the mantle. That's polytheism, atheism:

This religious sexual vacuum in the centre will lead to Chrislam, the downfall of Western culture:

Anyway, Omvolking (Population Transfer) is a very complicated matter and I am sure it will be better analyzed in the future:

END Excerpt.

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.