Assumption 245: All misunderstandings within Islamic culture, all the atrocities, killings and looting, rapes, stoning and acid attacks are the result of schizophrenic interactions among competing concepts of eternal life that never should have been mixed.
Assumption 246: All Islamic atrocities can be explained by the three way interaction:
Step 2: Inbreeding X earthly reincarnation (Homo erectus (2 mya; 900 cc)
Islam: Inbreed. X
Abstractions of eternal life
Human religion developed out of animal religion under two conditions. First condition is the increasing level of abstraction of 'eternal life'. Second is 'operational conditioning' as a learning method:
Assumption 180: Abraham and heaven. There is no heaven called in Genesis other than as ceiling of the earth. Also there is no mention of reincarnation into the earthly or in the parallel universe. And there is no evidence that Abraham, Isaac or God ever existed. But we do know the evolution of human religion follows logical laws. What means the level of abstraction of eternal life determines human religious development. Therefore, we interpret the myth of Abraham at best as the transition from earthly reincarnation to reincarnation into the parallel universe. The parallel universe is the final abstraction of eternal existence discovered by man.
Levels of eternal life
Remarkably the first level of eternal survival was not yet abstract but very concrete. This because saturated inbreeding lead to a better genetic mirror of the parents in the offspring. Genetic immortality was the first way of eternal life, though parents died. Forget about autosomal recessive disorders for the moment.
Genetic immortality was the primary reinforcer of inbreeding. But with reincarnation ancestors stayed alive; hence reincarnation into the (earthly) universe supplanted genetic immortality as a secondary reinforcer:
Operant response: inbreeding
Hence, since two million years the inbreeding instinct of Paradise culture is linked to earthly reincarnation of fathers, who sometimes are frustrated by unwilling daughters, which refuse forced marriages with their cousins.
In the third phase Homo sapiens discovered the parallel universe. Now tribal males got the promise of 72 fresh and exogamic women slaves from unknown tribes in heaven. This, because reincarnation into the own tribe with the same boring sisters and cousins was more a curse than a promise:
Assumption 178: Endogamous cultures are chained to inbreeding and incest in the earthly universe. The parallel universe offers them the illusion of an exogamous culture with sexual freedom and genetic diversity. For men, 72 wild virgins are the reward for a lifelong of sexual suffering from the unbearable dullness of their cousins. And for women it is the reward for a lifetime of sacrifice and fighting against their inherited instinct for genetic diversity. In heaven women will be redeemed from their endogamous chains. The confounded and contaminated projection (perpetual orgasm) of sadomasochism (monotheism) in an originally desexualized parallel universe is the religious opium for inbreeding cultures.
Rejection of former concepts of eternal life
Pay attention to what happened in evolution. With every new abstraction, exogamic cultures - that would later espouse Christianity - rejected previous concepts of eternal life:
1: Upon the discovery of reincarnation into the (earthly) universe by Homo erectus (2 mya, 900 cc) a lot of tribes renounced inbreeding and incest what was replaced with exogamy. They married women from other tribes and reincarnated into animals. Therefore the inbreeding instinct diluted and since long has been disappeared in Western society.
2: And below you see the change from earthly to parallel reincarnation,
in which again Christianity rejected the inbreeding and incest culture of paradise ànd earthly reincarnation, what was replaced in an orthogonal projection by reincarnation into the parallel universe combined with the totally new concept of the 'Fall of Man'. A perpendicular projection from one plain on the other is not possible:
This means exogamous cultures but always possessed one concept of eternal life. Hence, exogamies are flexible cultures, continuously innovating concepts and society.
But endogamous cultures like Paradise culture that was merged seamlessly into Islam, were unable to distance themselves from previous abstractions.
An endogamy can be maintained only through oppression of women. That's because women naturally opt for genetic diversity. Men who opt for sexual monoculture suffer from mental illness. And so the battle between endogamy and exogamy, between husband and wife became the basis of human religion.
1: In endogamous cultures, inbreeding and incest remained. Quite understandable because there is no crossing out of this instinct within closed endogamies.
2: Also earthly reincarnation remained but was suppressed in the unconscious. In today's Muslim cultures only inbreeding and incest are visible.
Assumption 18: The dilemma presented to Abraham was not so much the choice between polytheism and monotheism, between earthly idols and the only God in the parallel universe, but between primary and secondary reincarnation, between reincarnation into the (earthly) universe and heaven of the parallel universe. Because, who can arrange his own reincarnation has absolute power over the afterlife and does not need the parallel universe of monotheism any longer.
Both, reincarnation into the offspring by inbreeding and incest and reincarnation into earthly living beings undermined the power of monotheism, what's only weapon was reincarnation into the parallel universe.
But monotheism was wise and realized that tribal cultures easier abandoned reincarnation into animals than that they gave up their instinct of inbreeding.
By killing his only tribal begotten (!) son, Abraham indeed would cut off reincarnation into earthly descendants, but he would not lose his faith in earthly tribal gods.
That’s because we assume that inbreeding is an instinct in endogamous cultures. Hence, the external projection of the patriarch as a God himself would be destroyed by the kill of his only son, but his internal projection on continued tribal existence remained intact. Just to say that you can’t tell a tribal head (a Muslim male) that his inbreeding instinct does not exist any longer.
The same applies to the prohibition of idols (animals). External projections of gods (statues) can be forbidden, but internal representations remain. Therefore one cannot change a multi-dimensional god-space into a single dimension with a pen-stroke. Neither polytheism, nor earthly reincarnation could be removed by monotheism.
Thousands of years later, this estimation error of monotheism resulted in a ban on earthly reincarnation by Islam. As a result, Muslims lost every connection between inbreeding and reincarnation.
Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality
Assumption 181: The actual sadistic god of Islamic culture is not Allah but are tribal gods from Paradise culture. In the beginning Allah was intended as an escape from male sadism just like Christianity. This worked through Jesus in exogamous cultures, but failed due to endogamy among Muslims:
Allah, the women god from the SUPER EGO and tribal gods of the ID were contaminated and clashed on the level playing field of the EGO of Muslims.
What now is seen as Allah in the Koran and Sharia is a failed women god, which has been occupied by men. Hence Islam psychologically knows a male Allah who is dominant and a female Allah who describes the inner life of women.
This all because in monotheism there can be only one God. Allah must be understood as a multiple personality in Islamic culture. This is the cause of the sexual imbalance between man and wife: SM-dyad.
Assumption 77: Because the God of monotheism is defined as a known but unknown parameter (angle) of His Principal Axis in the space of (tribal) gods, the system of equations of paradise culture actually seemed unresolved.
Nevertheless the n-space of tribes was reduced to a by tribal heads accepted single dimension: monotheism. Knowing that hatred and hostility is the most common factor among Bedouin tribes, God and Allah must be based also on hatred and hostility. Hence, God and Allah are personifications of Sadism on the throne, and the real nature of monotheism must be sadomasochism."
Assumption 76: Consider the polytheistic set of n tribal heads in paradise culture as an overdetermined set of n-equations in the space of gods, which has to be caught by a single principal component: the assumed factor of sadomasochism. The angle to this main axis has to be given by the God of monotheism (m=1), who by definition is a known but unknown parameter, because God is defined as not to know. What means that this invisible God, the proposed principal binding factor among all those tribes, is agreed not to be known in an also unknown universe. What means that God gives a fake angle to the SM-dyad in space. But then it may be more parsimonious to define the power dimension of human sexual space directly as sadomasochism and to forget about 'God'.
Assumption 68: In humans, the number of dependent gods (n) in the polytheistic space of gods (rank = m = 5 vectors) in the archetype of God (rank = p = 5 factors) is naturally unlimited, with the SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) (p = 1).
Example of a schizophrenic interaction among three kinds of reincarnation
- Now, because of his unknown wish to reincarnate in the (earthly) universe, the father puts pressure on his daughter to inbreed with her cousin for 'the honor of the family'. The latter is because he does not know how to connect inbreeding with Allah in the parallel universe.
Refusal arranged marriage:
The father consciously wants to come into heaven of the parallel universe. But inbreeding has no logical link with the parallel universe. Unconsciously he still strives to reincarnation into the earthly universe. But there is no natural relation between inbreeding and reincarnation at all. What means all his motives to press his daughter to a forced marriage with her cousin is in fact pure nonsense. And 'the honor of the family' is a rehash of what really matters: his self-projection as a tribal god in the afterlife. He is the result of an interaction of religious indoctrination and an inbred population.
Earlier we concluded Muslim fathers are not allowed to worship themselves as tribal gods and to believe in earthly reincarnation. That’s why inbreeding is not propagated in the Koran.
Muslims suppress their intense desire for reincarnation into the (earthly) universe since 1400 years. Polytheism (tribal gods and idols) are forbidden on pain of death. Now, how would Allah possibly know of this hidden drive, where Muslims don’t even know by themselves consciously?
In the present scenario, conflicts are created in the conscious of the Muslim male, but the whole conflict of dissonance can easily be transferred to the unconscious. Then the father 'knows nothing' about it.
Therefore cognitive dissonance is a contradiction of interests, of the unconscious earthly reincarnation as a tribal god and the conscious parallel reincarnation into heaven of Allah, a contrast between Paradise culture in the unconscious and secondary Islam in the conscious.
Assumption 111: An honor killing can be seen as a human sacrifice, by which the father desperately confirms his belief in the parallel universe of Allah. By killing his daughter he makes earthly reincarnation impossible (Myth of Abraham).
Correcting cognitive dissonance
Now, after having paid the highest price on earth that a loving father can pay, he corrected for cognitive dissonance and certainly will deserve the kingdom of heaven.
Is this a crazy theory? Yes, of course it is, but millions of honor killings in history ask for crazy theories. In this theory we correlated father love with degree of violence. The more intense the love for his daughter, the more gruesome her killing must be. It is just one of many conceivable scenarios.
Hence, we also need to develop a working model for Muslim fathers with a huge bond with their daughters. This all means already in pre-puberty relations between daughters and fathers should be loosened. Obscene interest in the reproductive organs of daughters must be punished with immediate eviction from home of the daughter, by law and by force.