SexualReligion: (51) Women's emancipation causes Chrislam

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/

Number Archive

Religion can be seen as a subset of sexuality:

Within both cultures, Islam and Christianity, we assume an

endogamous - exogamous relation that yields the operational effect of religion: permeability.

But the difference between Islam and Christianity is the endogamous core of Christianity has been institutionalized in the clearly visible sadistic and authoritarian Catholic Church:

While within the Muslim world there are no visible institutions leading the culture. That's why only in Western culture, Christianity could be cut out as the endogamous heart by Marxist relativism:

Earlier in Enlightenment, Western culture developed the Vanilla-dyad of equal sexual roles:

But as said, in Islam the endogamous - exogamous dimension is not visible in institutions but is hidden in the SM-dyad, the relation between husband and wife:

And this instinctive relation based on inbreeding can only be altered by outbreeding or by women's emancipation.

So, in Islam, the endogamous heart of culture cannot be removed, except by the physical separation of husband and wife:

We know in Islam, the exogamic mantle is closed for females, so for them there is no sexual permeability to genetic diversity. It's just all red endogamy:

A healthy society

In a healthy society of higher mammals, permeability arises from the interaction between the endogamous core and the exogamous mantle. The degree of permeability determines genetic freedom for females. Below you see a healthy patriarchal group of higher mammals:

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality

It is obvious the endogamy of Islam keeps the culture in an all suffocating grip without genetic freedom for females:

Hence, Islamic culture is lowest on the ladder of civilization:

Assumption 213: Group of higher mammals:

A group of higher mammals exists by virtue of the balance between endogamy and exogamy.

Its endogamous core consists of the power of the alpha male to fertilize all females. Hence, he basically establishes a genetic monoculture by inbreeding and incest, only serving the immediate survival of the group. But in the long run his genes will be over-represented in his descendants, unless competitive males in the exogamous mantle contribute to genetic diversity.

But tension also arises between the sexual desires of the dominant male and females. Since females naturally tend to genetic diversity with other males. Hence, the exogamic outer layer consists of adulterous females chasing genetic diversity with other males and from other groups, what comes down to the permeability of the group.

For humans, the total permeability of the mantle depends on the relation between endogamous repulsion and exogamous attraction of external genes. This relation is the natural base of 'human religion'.

But only on the basis of inbreeding and incest (Islam) permeability is related to endogamy. Endogamous cores in completely permeable cultures as the Enlightenment are derived from other values.

Unlike Islam, female animals can easily escape the group of higher mammals. But it instinctively happens they prefer protection by the alpha male in exchange for sexual enslavement. In this way, strong posterity is assured, albeit by inbreeding. And that's why they also exchange genes with other males.

Now it happens, Islam also has a very good side because it has male heterosexuality as its natural core.

In contrast, Christianity cherishes the second God: male homosexuality in the core and into the mantle (not visible here because placed primarily in the core).

And male homosexuality of the clergy placed in the endogamic core hypocritically sees itself as representative of God on Earth, after the Alpha male remained in the animal kingdom, leaving the human god as a fossilized and anachronistic physiological trace in the brain:

Now remember sexual relations only work when females cooperate with males. And in Vanilla-dyad females are cooperative only because they have got equal rights. But actually it is against their sexual instinct because suffering is a sexual lust in SM-dyad:

And if Muslim females really didn't like to participate in this crying and moaning, Islam had not survived in evolution.

Now it is the merit of Jesus that he became the personification of 'other sexual roles', whereby in Christianity in particular females are seen as subjects. Remember 'other sexual roles' are the anti-projection of male heterosexuality and females in Islam are objects.

Though Jesus wanted protection for all oppressed on earth, those 'other sexual roles' have nothing in common, other than enforced masochism by Muslim males in Islam. This means, women naturally feel no sexual attraction to male homosexuality. And that's why they instinctively did not stand behind the haggling of the homosexual clergy in Christianity.

Therefore, after the murder of Christianity by Marxist nihilism, the homosexual clergy lost all power over women because social interests no longer ran parallel. Women no longer were protected by the church. Now, in women an unconscious longing awoke to the SM-dyad of Islam:

And that is the real reason Christianity collapsed late in the Enlightenment: females got enormous emancipatory power from Marxist nihilism and flocked back to SM-dyad, while at the same time not wanting to give up the benefits of Vanilla-dyad.
But now Western culture rolled into the schizophrenic situation, a hybrid form of religion, sadism and masochism, what combination we call SM in sexuality and Chrislam in religion:

Concluding, Christianity was only the second best solution, because is guaranteed natural rights, though it was against sexual nature:

After the Enlightenment was placed in the endogamic core by Marxist relativism, women got full equal rights by women's emancipation. And now they rejected the artificial prosthesis of Christian homosexuality completely. This means they rejected 'religion', but not the underlying sexual instincts.