.png)
Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Religion is a form of sexuality
In our view, religion is a form of sexuality. We also think religion has its origins in the animal kingdom. As a consequence the human brain contains a network of nerve cells which is used for sexuality as well as for religion.
In our working model we distinguish five areas of sexuality:
heterosexuality, homosexuality, female sexual roles, pedophilia and bestiality. This five-dimensional space also is the power space of man, on which all human power is projected.
The space has a super power as a main factor. In sexuality this is called sadomasochism. In religion it is called 'monotheism'. Monotheism is the principal component (main factor) of the polytheistic set of sexual gods. Hence, 'sexual roles' is the same as 'gods'. And monotheism is equal to sadomasochism. Now our structure of religion in the human brain has been completed:
Assumption 243: The cause of Chrislam:
As said, the first God is the masculine and polygamous heterosexual Alpha male who was left behind in the animal world. This is the configuration of Islam:
But this implies on the sexual dimension, Christianity always has been a religion weaker than Islam, because the homosexual clergy of Christianity is just the second God of the animal world, arrogantly only representing itself as deputy of the first on earth. In addition, a homosexual God has no superiority over women:
Human religion and bonobo religion
As said, the Christian church has been what we call the endogamous monotheistic heart of Western culture. But usually monotheism stands for the first heterosexual God, the Alpha male. It is clear a schizophrenic situation has arisen within Christianity where the homosexual clergy, as second sexual role, has taken the place the first God.
The endogamous Christian church was sadistic in nature so the teachings of Jesus in the exogamic mantle had to give counterweight. Jesus learned something quite different and respected 'other sexual roles'.
.jpg)
Jesus is the personification of 'other sexual roles', which is the anti-projection of God. And Jesus as the son of God must be a God himself too. This means with two gods all sexual roles are consciously and emphatically known in Christianity:
But in Islam, Mohammed cannot be a God because Muslims can never be gods. What means there exists only one God in the conscious of Muslim males. All other sexual roles are suppressed to the unconscious. Would Muslims recognize homosexuality, Allah lost his omnipotence immediately and Muslim males lost their power over females. That's why real monotheism never will accept homosexuality:
The conscious experience of just one God means splitting sexual identity between the conscious and the unconscious:
.jpg)
Now we know monotheism of Islam kills homosexuals and the Christian church has great difficulty accepting them. That's why bonobos stand higher on the ladder of civilization than Christians:
.jpg)
Of course Muslim males will reject homosexuality as their God. They still worship inbreeding and incest of the Alpha male and that's why Islam will always defeat Christianity.
Moreover, Christianity is nothing more than the masochistic counterpart of sadistic Islam. Hence, on the instinctive dimension, the SM-dyad of Islam will always defeat Vanilla-dyad of Christianity. That's because the latter is only prosthesis for the real sexual instinct.
Therefore we see the murder of Marxist nihilism on the homosexual clergy of Christianity automatically created a vacuum for the heterosexual God of Islam. Marxism nihilism accidentally created Chrislam:
With the march through the institutions, at that historical moment, policor extradited Christianity to Islam, which became the new endogamous heart of Western culture:
.jpg)
Unaware of looking for a new religious endogamous core, policor suggested every effort to capture the endogamous heart of Islam. But they really thought they treated Islam the same as other religions under their multicultural exogamous mantle.
And so, as alleged multiculturalism, Islamic absolutism was imported right into the heart of Western culture.
Islam occupied the empty place of the homosexual clergy to peace and salvation of policor, who sacrificed the empty shell of exogamous Western culture to a sadistic mass murderer.
But a major determinant of the emergence of Chrislam is women's emancipation in Western culture. Because it was women, who instinctively did not acknowledge sexual superiority of the homosexual clergy:
Assumption 246: In the exogamous mantle (sexuality) of Christianity, women project themselves in Jesus as personification of 'other sexual roles', which includes male homosexuality as a second God. But in nature, women have an anti-projection on the endogamous core (religion), on the first sexual God, well known as male heterosexuality. That follows SM-dyad. But in current sick religion of Christianity homosexuality plays a major role, both in the endogamous core (homosexual clergy) as in the exogamous mantle (Jesus), making Christianity fall under Vanilla-dyad. But the latter is only prosthesis on the sexual instinct and women have no instinctive relation with male homosexuality. Which means in evolution Christianity will return to SM-dyad, to Chrislam and women's emancipation will drag sadistic Allah into Europe.
.jpg)
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Religion is a form of sexuality
In our view, religion is a form of sexuality. We also think religion has its origins in the animal kingdom. As a consequence the human brain contains a network of nerve cells which is used for sexuality as well as for religion.
In our working model we distinguish five areas of sexuality:
heterosexuality, homosexuality, female sexual roles, pedophilia and bestiality. This five-dimensional space also is the power space of man, on which all human power is projected.
The space has a super power as a main factor. In sexuality this is called sadomasochism. In religion it is called 'monotheism'. Monotheism is the principal component (main factor) of the polytheistic set of sexual gods. Hence, 'sexual roles' is the same as 'gods'. And monotheism is equal to sadomasochism. Now our structure of religion in the human brain has been completed:
Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality
Assumption 243: The cause of Chrislam:
As said, the first God is the masculine and polygamous heterosexual Alpha male who was left behind in the animal world. This is the configuration of Islam:
But this implies on the sexual dimension, Christianity always has been a religion weaker than Islam, because the homosexual clergy of Christianity is just the second God of the animal world, arrogantly only representing itself as deputy of the first on earth. In addition, a homosexual God has no superiority over women:
Human religion and bonobo religion
As said, the Christian church has been what we call the endogamous monotheistic heart of Western culture. But usually monotheism stands for the first heterosexual God, the Alpha male. It is clear a schizophrenic situation has arisen within Christianity where the homosexual clergy, as second sexual role, has taken the place the first God.
The endogamous Christian church was sadistic in nature so the teachings of Jesus in the exogamic mantle had to give counterweight. Jesus learned something quite different and respected 'other sexual roles'.
.jpg)
Jesus is the personification of 'other sexual roles', which is the anti-projection of God. And Jesus as the son of God must be a God himself too. This means with two gods all sexual roles are consciously and emphatically known in Christianity:
But in Islam, Mohammed cannot be a God because Muslims can never be gods. What means there exists only one God in the conscious of Muslim males. All other sexual roles are suppressed to the unconscious. Would Muslims recognize homosexuality, Allah lost his omnipotence immediately and Muslim males lost their power over females. That's why real monotheism never will accept homosexuality:
The conscious experience of just one God means splitting sexual identity between the conscious and the unconscious:
.jpg)
Now we know monotheism of Islam kills homosexuals and the Christian church has great difficulty accepting them. That's why bonobos stand higher on the ladder of civilization than Christians:
Of course Muslim males will reject homosexuality as their God. They still worship inbreeding and incest of the Alpha male and that's why Islam will always defeat Christianity.
Moreover, Christianity is nothing more than the masochistic counterpart of sadistic Islam. Hence, on the instinctive dimension, the SM-dyad of Islam will always defeat Vanilla-dyad of Christianity. That's because the latter is only prosthesis for the real sexual instinct.
Therefore we see the murder of Marxist nihilism on the homosexual clergy of Christianity automatically created a vacuum for the heterosexual God of Islam. Marxism nihilism accidentally created Chrislam:
With the march through the institutions, at that historical moment, policor extradited Christianity to Islam, which became the new endogamous heart of Western culture:
Unaware of looking for a new religious endogamous core, policor suggested every effort to capture the endogamous heart of Islam. But they really thought they treated Islam the same as other religions under their multicultural exogamous mantle.
And so, as alleged multiculturalism, Islamic absolutism was imported right into the heart of Western culture.
Islam occupied the empty place of the homosexual clergy to peace and salvation of policor, who sacrificed the empty shell of exogamous Western culture to a sadistic mass murderer.
But a major determinant of the emergence of Chrislam is women's emancipation in Western culture. Because it was women, who instinctively did not acknowledge sexual superiority of the homosexual clergy:
Assumption 246: In the exogamous mantle (sexuality) of Christianity, women project themselves in Jesus as personification of 'other sexual roles', which includes male homosexuality as a second God. But in nature, women have an anti-projection on the endogamous core (religion), on the first sexual God, well known as male heterosexuality. That follows SM-dyad. But in current sick religion of Christianity homosexuality plays a major role, both in the endogamous core (homosexual clergy) as in the exogamous mantle (Jesus), making Christianity fall under Vanilla-dyad. But the latter is only prosthesis on the sexual instinct and women have no instinctive relation with male homosexuality. Which means in evolution Christianity will return to SM-dyad, to Chrislam and women's emancipation will drag sadistic Allah into Europe.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment