.png)
Basic Dimension
Number Archive
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federica_Mogherini
Federica Mogherini (born 16 June 1973) is an Italian politician and the current High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission in the Juncker Commission since 1 November 2014.
Mogherini was Italy's Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation from 21 February 2014 until 31 October 2014 in the centre-left Cabinet of Matteo Renzi.
She is a member of the Italian Democratic Party and the Party of European Socialists.
Mogherini attended the Sapienza University of Rome where she studied Political Science graduating with a Diploma in Political Philosophy with a thesis entitled "Relationship between religion and politics in Islam", which she wrote whilst on the Erasmus programme at Aix-en-Provence, France.
A member of the Italian Communist Youth Federation from 1988, in 1996 Mogherini joined the Youth Left after the dissolution of the Italian Communist Party before its transformation into a social democratic party.
Mogherini married Matteo Rebesani; they have two daughters.
THE COUP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
No director of the EU-government is democratically elected and political machinations therefore can be grasped from successively installed politicians.
Herman Van Rompuy is a Catholic and Jesuit and was President of the European Council from January 1, 2010 to November 30, 2014, in the media referred to as the 'President of Europe'. Donald Franciszek Tusk is a Polish liberal, who succeeded Van Rompuy. So the Presidency of the European Council changed from Christianity (endogamy) to liberalism (exogamy).
Catherine Ashton of the British Labour Party (exogamy) was High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy from December 1, 2009 to November 1, 2014. Federica Mogherini is her successor (exogamy ànd endogamy).
The ultimate endogamous goal of the Union (its religion) is the elimination of the nation states in favor of a newly formed cultural heart of Europe.
In utter naivety Marxist nihilists like Barroso and Ashton believed - as in the sixties with the "march through the institutions" - that after the destruction of the endogamous cores of nation states a new European heart would arise automatically.
But nothing was further from the truth and that's why Van Rompuy's drabness and Barroso's mental emptiness were replaced by the qualities of Federica Mogherini, who was given a free role as libero in foreign affairs to search for a new heart for Europe, called 'Chrislam'.
All that's left of endogamous bonding is the axis Juncker - Mogherini: Christianity - Islam. Together they will decide which endogamous heart will replace the cultures of the nation states. Under the paternal coaching of Christian Democrat Juncker, most charming Federica Mogherini will lead the Union to the slaughter by Chrislam.
Federica Mogherini
We are not interested in the person of Ms. Mogherini itself, but in the female representative of Marxist nihilism, now ruining European endogamic cores, the cultures of the nation states, replacing them with Islam:
.jpg)
.jpg)
Because of this dissenting view, some key concepts will first be made clear:
The Sexual Theory of Religion
Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.
Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.
Assumption 196: The measure of religion is group permeability seen in integration, assimilation and segregation:
After having clarified some basic elements of our religious model, we also cast 'racism' in this mold:
The development of racism
.jpg)
Assumption 240: The development of racism.
1: In the animal world groups accept only members of the same kind so they can propagate. Hence, a group of gorillas will not accept a female chimp. This is discrimination between species. Later in the evolution, another form of discrimination emerged, but now as discrimination within species, called racism.
2: Though all kinds of Homininae (7 mya; 400 cc) possibly were of the same species, they already started to select their own kind, their own race. Their group identity drifted away from pure physical propagation into the religious propagation of tribal identity (religion). So they were not interested in pure propagation with other Homininae races any longer, but more in maintaining feelings of tribal identity. And the only way to control for tribal belongingness was race, not culture. So Homininae already selected on external racial characteristics.
3: Much later racism must have been strengthened further through reincarnation into the tribe (Homo erectus; 2 mya, 900 cc). For, only by pure inbred bodies of descendants, ancestors could reincarnate into the tribe. Concluding, real racism started with the Homininae (400 cc; 7 mya) and was strengthened by Homo erectus (900 cc; 2 mya).
4: Homo sapiens (1400 cc; 200.000 ya) developed bigger tribes and bigger cultures. Still tribal belongingness (religion) was seen from the racial appearance of foreigners. The same with the period of ethnic endogamy. Only later in religious endogamy, factual religion (Islam, Christianity) really became more important than race. For example, today the religious endogamic outer layer of Islam is not filled with Arabs any longer but with a billion people of other races.
Yet we judge Islam as a completely racist culture because it distinguishes between human beings like the Nazis: It oppresses 'other sexual roles'.
5: Concluding: in the evolution preserving genes of groups has been changed to preserving religion within human tribes.
6: But because selective breeding cultures like Islam imply strong interactions between ethnicity and culture, racial appearance still effectively triggers cultural discrimination.
Therefore, also in the modern world racism continues to be a simple and effective mechanism to distinguish between persons from different cultures. Obviously, this results in many errors of judgment.
Next, we apply the sexual theory of religion to the interaction between Christianity and Islam:
Dynamics between Islam and Christianity
It is implied by our sexual philosophy of human religion Christianity is involved in a deadly sexual embrace with Islam:
.jpg)
Ms. Mogherini's political ideas are a perfect illustration of this theory:
.jpg)
Christianity is actively seeking for a masochistic relation with passive sadistic Islam.
Assumption 283: Policor.
Martien Pennings wrote a splendid but harsh psychological analysis about Ms. Mogherini, from which we only highlight some elements to illustrate our case:
https://martienpennings.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/federica-mogherini-will-change-europe-into-an-islamic-hell/
https://martienpennings.wordpress.com/2015/07/27/federica-mogherini-zal-europa-in-een-islamitische-hel-veranderen/
Federica Mogherini is presented as a mere representative of Marxist nihilism, aiming to destroy the cultures of the nation states. Just like the EU she has the absurd illusion a new homogeneous European culture of laborers will be created automatically, dominated by a new endogamic core:
Now it is absolutely clear Ms. Mogherini has Islam in mind as our new European predominant endogamous culture:
.jpg)
In his article Pennings refers to two concentric circles, which we recognize as the endogamous and exogamous forces within mammal groups:
“( . . .) Islam is a systematized obsession with sexuality, with what people have between their legs. That Islamic “culture” consists of two concentric circles of repression: in the outer circle all men suppress all women and in the inner circle a male elite suppresses socially weaker men. The game is about the possession of women – about sex in the first place, as always and everywhere – and about wealth and power. Islam is an empty, harsh system in which baffling blockheads, cynical murderers, hypocritical bastards and sex addicted pedophiles set the tone. Islam is an already 1,400-year ongoing slow Holocaust in which besides the Jew the woman also plays the role of Jew.”
Federica Mogherini
Mogherini's basic statement about Islam is as follows:
“Islam holds a place in our Western societies. Islam belongs in Europe. It holds a place in Europe’s history, in our culture, in our food and – what matters most – in Europe’s present and future. Like it or not, this is the reality. ( . . .) With the European project, after World War II, not only we accepted diversity: we expressed a Desire for diversity to be a core feature of our Union.”
“We need to show some humble respect for diversity. Diversity is the core feature of our European history, and it is our strength. ( . . .) For this reason I am not afraid to say that political Islam should be part of the picture.”
'Like it or not, this is the reality.'
Firstly, note how Ms. Mogherini portrays Muslim mass immigration as a fait accompli, where we demonstrated earlier how Marxist nihilism has given rise to and partly caused this demographic disaster:
Cultural Marxism cut out the endogamous heart of Europe:
.jpg)
Secondly, Ms. Mogherini incidentally makes a perfect analysis of European culture:
Indeed because the desire for diversity can be seen as the primal trait of genetic diversity of European peoples, manifested earlier in imperialism and colonialism.
It's what we call the complete permeability of the exogamous mantle of European culture:
The development of racism
Assumption 240: The development of racism.
1: In the animal world groups accept only members of the same kind so they can propagate. Hence, a group of gorillas will not accept a female chimp. This is discrimination between species. Later in the evolution, another form of discrimination emerged, but now as discrimination within species, called racism.
2: Though all kinds of Homininae (7 mya; 400 cc) possibly were of the same species, they already started to select their own kind, their own race. Their group identity drifted away from pure physical propagation into the religious propagation of tribal identity (religion). So they were not interested in pure propagation with other Homininae races any longer, but more in maintaining feelings of tribal identity. And the only way to control for tribal belongingness was race, not culture. So Homininae already selected on external racial characteristics.
3: Much later racism must have been strengthened further through reincarnation into the tribe (Homo erectus; 2 mya, 900 cc). For, only by pure inbred bodies of descendants, ancestors could reincarnate into the tribe. Concluding, real racism started with the Homininae (400 cc; 7 mya) and was strengthened by Homo erectus (900 cc; 2 mya).
4: Homo sapiens (1400 cc; 200.000 ya) developed bigger tribes and bigger cultures. Still tribal belongingness (religion) was seen from the racial appearance of foreigners. The same with the period of ethnic endogamy. Only later in religious endogamy, factual religion (Islam, Christianity) really became more important than race. For example, today the religious endogamic outer layer of Islam is not filled with Arabs any longer but with a billion people of other races.
Yet we judge Islam as a completely racist culture because it distinguishes between human beings like the Nazis: It oppresses 'other sexual roles'.
5: Concluding: in the evolution preserving genes of groups has been changed to preserving religion within human tribes.
6: But because selective breeding cultures like Islam imply strong interactions between ethnicity and culture, racial appearance still effectively triggers cultural discrimination.
Therefore, also in the modern world racism continues to be a simple and effective mechanism to distinguish between persons from different cultures. Obviously, this results in many errors of judgment.
Next, we apply the sexual theory of religion to the interaction between Christianity and Islam:
Dynamics between Islam and Christianity
It is implied by our sexual philosophy of human religion Christianity is involved in a deadly sexual embrace with Islam:
Ms. Mogherini's political ideas are a perfect illustration of this theory:
Christianity is actively seeking for a masochistic relation with passive sadistic Islam.
Assumption 283: Policor.
Policor is a worldwide movement to undermine Western culture. Nowadays representatives are the EU, the globalists and the Democratic Party of the United States. Policor started with Romanticism (Rousseau) as built-in movement of the Enlightenment. The latter failed to formulate rules to discriminate between cultures, on which Romanticism judged all cultures equal and equivalent. In fact, the Enlightenment gave the impulse to the destruction of Christianity. In the twentieth century the Frankfurter Schule proclaimed the destruction of Western culture, followed by Marxist relativism or - nihilism. Later on 'all cultures are equal and equivalent' culminated into multiculturalism. The underlying idea was to establish a world government of globalists which could benefit from an army of cheap laborers (deplorables, irredeemables). Hillary Clinton is the latest representative of American policor. To accelerate the destruction of Western culture the EU destroyed the Nation States of Europe and negated democracy. Eurocrats call democracy: 'populism'. A further goal is to set up refugee flows to erase the identity of the European culture. Policor attracts criminals, fraud and corruption and consists of sexual deviant groups which find in Islam a shining example.
Martien Pennings wrote a splendid but harsh psychological analysis about Ms. Mogherini, from which we only highlight some elements to illustrate our case:
Federica Mogherini will change Europe into an Islamic hell
https://martienpennings.wordpress.com/2015/07/27/federica-mogherini-zal-europa-in-een-islamitische-hel-veranderen/
Federica Mogherini is presented as a mere representative of Marxist nihilism, aiming to destroy the cultures of the nation states. Just like the EU she has the absurd illusion a new homogeneous European culture of laborers will be created automatically, dominated by a new endogamic core:
Now it is absolutely clear Ms. Mogherini has Islam in mind as our new European predominant endogamous culture:
.jpg)
In his article Pennings refers to two concentric circles, which we recognize as the endogamous and exogamous forces within mammal groups:
“( . . .) Islam is a systematized obsession with sexuality, with what people have between their legs. That Islamic “culture” consists of two concentric circles of repression: in the outer circle all men suppress all women and in the inner circle a male elite suppresses socially weaker men. The game is about the possession of women – about sex in the first place, as always and everywhere – and about wealth and power. Islam is an empty, harsh system in which baffling blockheads, cynical murderers, hypocritical bastards and sex addicted pedophiles set the tone. Islam is an already 1,400-year ongoing slow Holocaust in which besides the Jew the woman also plays the role of Jew.”
Federica Mogherini
Mogherini's basic statement about Islam is as follows:
“Islam holds a place in our Western societies. Islam belongs in Europe. It holds a place in Europe’s history, in our culture, in our food and – what matters most – in Europe’s present and future. Like it or not, this is the reality. ( . . .) With the European project, after World War II, not only we accepted diversity: we expressed a Desire for diversity to be a core feature of our Union.”
“We need to show some humble respect for diversity. Diversity is the core feature of our European history, and it is our strength. ( . . .) For this reason I am not afraid to say that political Islam should be part of the picture.”
'Like it or not, this is the reality.'
Firstly, note how Ms. Mogherini portrays Muslim mass immigration as a fait accompli, where we demonstrated earlier how Marxist nihilism has given rise to and partly caused this demographic disaster:
Cultural Marxism cut out the endogamous heart of Europe:
.jpg)
Secondly, Ms. Mogherini incidentally makes a perfect analysis of European culture:
Indeed because the desire for diversity can be seen as the primal trait of genetic diversity of European peoples, manifested earlier in imperialism and colonialism.
It's what we call the complete permeability of the exogamous mantle of European culture:
But now, because it is no longer possible to export this imperial lust to the colonies, Europe has no other choice than to import genetic diversity from abroad.
But how come the exogamous lust of European nations broke loose apparently without control? That is not an inevitable process as Ms. Mogherini wants us to believe, but is the fault of the Marxist nihilism.
The march through the institutions
The Frankfurter Schule was a cultural Marxist movement aiming to destroy the endogamous core of Western culture, especially Christianity.
This destruction was necessary to build international socialism in Western society. Their intent was depillarization or deconfessionalization.
In the sixties of the last century nihilistic Marxism started 'the march through the institutions' to overthrow the established order. They succeeded, but instead of setting cultural Marxism as a new endogamic core:
.jpg)
they created nothing new, namely cultural relativism in the mantle. Look how gorgeous they brought Western culture to its multidimensional disruption, however without the promised renewal, simply because they did not understand to be nothing more than an instrument to destruction of this exogamous culture:
Actually the march cut out the heart of Western culture and destroyed the second god: the endogamous homosexual clergy:
Depillarization resulted into cultural nihilism and cultural relativism. Western culture without its endogamous Christian heart was unprecedented and collapsed into puberty. Now it had to stand on its own as a teenager.
Marxism offered not the slightest endogamous depth and has not been able to replace Christianity. Western culture never realized how much it has been uprooted as a group without Christianity and policor was rudderless searching for a new identity.
Enlightenment and Christianity
In the eighteenth century the Western world has chosen for the Enlightenment of
But how come the exogamous lust of European nations broke loose apparently without control? That is not an inevitable process as Ms. Mogherini wants us to believe, but is the fault of the Marxist nihilism.
The march through the institutions
The Frankfurter Schule was a cultural Marxist movement aiming to destroy the endogamous core of Western culture, especially Christianity.
This destruction was necessary to build international socialism in Western society. Their intent was depillarization or deconfessionalization.
In the sixties of the last century nihilistic Marxism started 'the march through the institutions' to overthrow the established order. They succeeded, but instead of setting cultural Marxism as a new endogamic core:
.jpg)
they created nothing new, namely cultural relativism in the mantle. Look how gorgeous they brought Western culture to its multidimensional disruption, however without the promised renewal, simply because they did not understand to be nothing more than an instrument to destruction of this exogamous culture:
Actually the march cut out the heart of Western culture and destroyed the second god: the endogamous homosexual clergy:
Depillarization resulted into cultural nihilism and cultural relativism. Western culture without its endogamous Christian heart was unprecedented and collapsed into puberty. Now it had to stand on its own as a teenager.
Marxism offered not the slightest endogamous depth and has not been able to replace Christianity. Western culture never realized how much it has been uprooted as a group without Christianity and policor was rudderless searching for a new identity.
Enlightenment and Christianity
In the eighteenth century the Western world has chosen for the Enlightenment of
Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. And in a lengthy process of ages the Enlightenment got more and more influence on the endogamous heart at the expense of the sadistic Christian church:
But what really happened in the twentieth century was Marxists expelled the Christian church from the center of power in the Netherlands. Only the Enlightenment remained in the endogamous core. But now Western culture was in big trouble:
Federica Mogherini:
“Inclusiveness can be the key to our success – both when we talk foreign policy and when we deal with our home affairs. ( . . .) We need to pass a cultural message, to lay the basis for our political message: any attempt to divide the peoples of Europe into ‘us’ and ‘them’ brings us in the wrong direction. The migrants and us. The Muslims and us. The Jews and us, as anti-Semitism has not been defeated at all The ‘other’ and us. We learnt from our history that we all are someone else’s ‘other’. The fear of the other can only lead us to new conflicts.”
In Marxist nihilism the ideological distinction between cultures disappeared, after which the T- cells turned against all kinds of racist movements:
But 'no discrimination among cultures' automatically means losing itself as a group, as a cultural entity. Better replace Christianity by a new endogamous core to protect European culture against Islamic terror. Time is running out...
Full exogamy completely freed almost all sexual roles from the sexual dictatorship of monotheism, and plunged the semi-polytheistic Christianity into the atheistic polytheism of BDSM. And Muslims were right, because for them Western culture changed into Sodom and Gomorrah which desperately needed a new endogamic heart.
The rise of Policor
In the Netherlands, Article 1 of the constitution came into effect in 1983.
In this new law Policor (Political Correctness: former left wing Christians but now Marxist communists) protected Islam - known as the world's most discriminating religion - against religious discrimination. Muslims were allowed to slaughter their daughters in our backyard:
.jpg)
Policor unconsciously knew the only endogamous force able to replace Christianity was the even stronger sadistic Islam.
For that reason, Western culture imported Islam massively in the fourth quarter of the last century:
Assumption 243: The cause of Chrislam:
On the sexual dimension Christianity always is a weaker religion than Islam, because the homosexual clergy of Christianity is only the second God of the animal world, arrogantly representing itself as deputy of the first on earth. As we know the first God is the masculine and polygamous heterosexual Alpha male who was left behind in the animal world. Of course Muslim males will reject homosexuality as their God. They still worship inbreeding and incest of the Alpha male and that's why Islam will always win from Christianity. Moreover, Christianity is nothing more than the masochistic counterpart of sadistic Islam. Hence, on the instinctive dimension, the SM-dyad will always defeat Vanilla-dyad. That's because the latter is only prosthesis for the real sexual instinct. Therefore we see the murder of Marxist nihilism on the homosexual clergy of Christianity automatically created a vacuum for the heterosexual God of Islam. Marxism nihilism accidentally created Chrislam.
Unaware of looking for a new religious endogamous core, policor suggested every effort to capture the endogamous heart of Islam. But they really thought they treated Islam the same as other religions under their multicultural exogamous mantle.
And so, as alleged multiculturalism, Islamic absolutism was imported right into the heart of Western culture. For in that era, choosing authoritarian absolutism (of Islam) was at odds with the prevailing cultural flow of total democracy and relativism.
.jpg)
And that's why multiculturalism unwittingly turned into the masochistic squirm with ass up for a gruesome and sadistic Islamic ruler.
This sadistic tyrant was absolutely needed to let our masochistic culture retrieve its counterweight. This is because two points are needed to draw a straight line.
Determinatio negatio est (Spinoza 1647). Determination is negation. In order to be determined, in order to exist as a particular entity, it is necessary to ignore the opposite. So, existence is to deny the opposite. Everything that exists in the world (masochism) requires for its existence also the existence of its opposite (sadism). The direction in space of masochism is determined by sadism as the line between two points.
Islam occupied the empty place of the homosexual clergy to peace and salvation of policor, who sacrificed the empty shell of exogamous Western culture to a sadistic mass murderer.
But a major determinant of the emergence of Chrislam is women's emancipation in Western culture. Because it was women, who instinctively did not acknowledge sexual superiority of the homosexual clergy:
Assumption 246: In the exogamous mantle (sexuality) of Christianity, women project themselves in Jesus as personification of 'other sexual roles', which includes male homosexuality as a second God. But in nature, women have an anti-projection on the endogamous core (religion), on the first sexual God, well known as male heterosexuality. That follows SM-dyad. But in current sick religion of Christianity homosexuality plays a major role, both in the endogamous core (homosexual clergy) as in the exogamous mantle (Jesus), making Christianity fall under Vanilla-dyad. But the latter is only prosthesis on the sexual instinct and women have no instinctive relation with male homosexuality. Which means in evolution Christianity will return to SM-dyad, to Chrislam and women's emancipation will drag sadistic Allah into Europe.
The travesty of the Schengen agreement
Because the core disappeared in Western society, it dissolves in atheism and individualism. There is no group any more:
Western culture is like a faded flower falling apart just as the Roman Empire. What was already evident by the elimination of all borders by the Schengen agreement.
Schengen writes the necrology of European culture. This is the end stage of exogamy, complete permeability of the mammal group. Now the body will be killed by an invasion of parasites and by a flow of fortune seekers from all directions which engulf Europe, helped by the insane bombardments on Muslim states by NATO:
Once European culture has bled to death it will be overrun by Islamic hordes:
This is the end stage of exogamy, complete permeability of a mammal group:
That's why Geert Wilders has to fight Islamic culture instead of Muslims. So, there is only one hypothetical wormhole through which the exogamous Western culture can escape and not to be slaughtered by the endogamous core of Islamic hatred.
But of course, this is dancing on the edge of the volcano. There only needs to be done little to address the aggression against Muslims themselves, because this difference is only artificially applied to formulate a wormhole in Enlightenment to the rescue of Western culture.
This is artificially, because a strong interaction exists between ethnicity and culture especially in selective breeding cultures.
So, Western society brought itself into real trouble and will not overcome this Gordian knot without violence.
Mogherini, who participated at the Tunis summit, apparently had more pressing priorities. Prefacing her speech with words that were meant to give the expression that the EU and the Arab League are almost like two sides of the same coin, she said: "We are so geographically and culturally close, and we face so many common challenges, and we have so many opportunities to work together".
In her speech, she mentioned that Europe and the Arab League have four priorities -- none of them included the issue of human rights in the region. Nor did those priorities include the smallest reference to all the problems with which Europe is struggling -- migration from the Arab world, terrorism and extremism imported from the Arab world, which is directly affecting the physical security of Europeans. Instead, Mogherini said, "The first point, the first top issue on our respective agenda: Israel and Palestine. We need to continue to work together very closely, because we share the same sense of priority, the same sense of urgency, the same concerns and the same objectives: to get back to meaningful negotiations towards the two-state solution, which is the only viable, realistic solution".
Mogherini did, however, place great emphasis on the following, "One issue on which I believe it is crucial that Arabs and Europeans work together very closely: we need to preserve diversity in our societies. We need to prevent the rise of hate, starting with preventing Islamophobia in our societies. We need to work together to make sure that in all our countries, no one excluded in Europe as in the Arab world, everyone is accepted, protected and respected as a human being, whatever his or her background is, whatever religious belief, gender, age, identity. We value diversity and we believe that everyone needs to find his and her place in our societies. So we have a joint interest and a joint responsibility to nourish and preserve diversity and together with that the dignity of every single human being".
Perhaps, before Mogherini spoke of preserving diversity, she should have addressed the concerns expressed by the International Commission of Jurists on the human rights violations of the region and its lack of basic human freedoms and diversity of religion, speech, identity and gender. Mogherini, however, chose to keep silent.
Instead, Mogherini's words came across as references to the EU's own continued efforts to monitor and police free speech and thus, gradually, to extinguish any kind of diversity of opinion within the EU.
There is just one main factor responsible for Omvolking:
Husband-wife relationship (SM-dyad versus Vanilla-dyad).
SM-Dyad is a sexual instinct formed by Australopithecus.
Vanilla-dyad is a cultural entity.
This factor can be split into two sub dimensions:
1: Equivalent sexual roles (monotheism versus polytheism) and
2: the femininity factor (caused by women's suffrage).
These two sub dimensions interact strongly:
Thisreligious sexual vacuum in the centre will lead to Chrislam, the downfall of Western culture:
.jpg)
But what really happened in the twentieth century was Marxists expelled the Christian church from the center of power in the Netherlands. Only the Enlightenment remained in the endogamous core. But now Western culture was in big trouble:
Federica Mogherini:
“Inclusiveness can be the key to our success – both when we talk foreign policy and when we deal with our home affairs. ( . . .) We need to pass a cultural message, to lay the basis for our political message: any attempt to divide the peoples of Europe into ‘us’ and ‘them’ brings us in the wrong direction. The migrants and us. The Muslims and us. The Jews and us, as anti-Semitism has not been defeated at all The ‘other’ and us. We learnt from our history that we all are someone else’s ‘other’. The fear of the other can only lead us to new conflicts.”
In Marxist nihilism the ideological distinction between cultures disappeared, after which the T- cells turned against all kinds of racist movements:
But 'no discrimination among cultures' automatically means losing itself as a group, as a cultural entity. Better replace Christianity by a new endogamous core to protect European culture against Islamic terror. Time is running out...
As said with the expulsion of the authoritarian Christian church immediately we see the problem of the Western group of higher mammals in the last century. This is because they placed the exogamous mantle into their endogamous core. Now they had chosen Jesus in the mantle AND in the core:
Choosing 'all people are equivalent' as the new endogamic core, coming from Enlightenment, has been an extremely dangerous mistake, because now tension between the core and the mantle was gone:
The core lost its power over the mantle and the group of higher mammals degenerated to an uncontrolled collection of atheistic individuals eager for promiscuous genetic diversity:
And exactly that happened after Western culture expelled the Christian church from its endogamous core and that's why Europe fell prey to the super sadism of Islam.
But think about it, authoritarian Christianity was completed and rejected, only Islam had the power to save the Western exogamous shell from a total collapse. So it was felt unconsciously.
So, the basic error in Western culture is a wrong interpretation of the teachings of Jesus: 'Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself'. This only works in completely exogamous cultures, where people respect each other in equivalence: the principle of mutuality:
.jpg)
Unfortunately, nowadays Christians (policor) are sick masochistic believers subjecting themselves with the ass up to every sadistic ruler (Islam) sent by God.
Matthew 5:44
King James Bible Jesus:
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Choosing 'all people are equivalent' as the new endogamic core, coming from Enlightenment, has been an extremely dangerous mistake, because now tension between the core and the mantle was gone:
Assumption 207: In a healthy group, there exists a tension between the endogamous core and the exogamous mantle. If one of them is missing the culture must be sick. Seen in evolutionary perspective, Western culture lacks its endogamous heart and Islamic culture has no exogamous mantle, hence both must be regarded as religious cultures on the verge of extinction.
The core lost its power over the mantle and the group of higher mammals degenerated to an uncontrolled collection of atheistic individuals eager for promiscuous genetic diversity:
And exactly that happened after Western culture expelled the Christian church from its endogamous core and that's why Europe fell prey to the super sadism of Islam.
With the march through the institutions, at that historical moment, policor extradited Christianity to Islam, which became the new endogamous heart of Western culture.
But think about it, authoritarian Christianity was completed and rejected, only Islam had the power to save the Western exogamous shell from a total collapse. So it was felt unconsciously.
What means the greedily gobbling of the atrocities of Islam was no expression of cultural relativism or multiculturalism, but rather a desperate return to the laws of the group, which prescribe a forced interaction between the lost endogamous core and its exogamous mantle:
Unfortunately, nowadays Christians (policor) are sick masochistic believers subjecting themselves with the ass up to every sadistic ruler (Islam) sent by God.
Matthew 5:44
King James Bible Jesus:
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Full exogamy completely freed almost all sexual roles from the sexual dictatorship of monotheism, and plunged the semi-polytheistic Christianity into the atheistic polytheism of BDSM. And Muslims were right, because for them Western culture changed into Sodom and Gomorrah which desperately needed a new endogamic heart.
The rise of Policor
In the Netherlands, Article 1 of the constitution came into effect in 1983.
In this new law Policor (Political Correctness: former left wing Christians but now Marxist communists) protected Islam - known as the world's most discriminating religion - against religious discrimination. Muslims were allowed to slaughter their daughters in our backyard:
For that reason, Western culture imported Islam massively in the fourth quarter of the last century:
Assumption 243: The cause of Chrislam:
On the sexual dimension Christianity always is a weaker religion than Islam, because the homosexual clergy of Christianity is only the second God of the animal world, arrogantly representing itself as deputy of the first on earth. As we know the first God is the masculine and polygamous heterosexual Alpha male who was left behind in the animal world. Of course Muslim males will reject homosexuality as their God. They still worship inbreeding and incest of the Alpha male and that's why Islam will always win from Christianity. Moreover, Christianity is nothing more than the masochistic counterpart of sadistic Islam. Hence, on the instinctive dimension, the SM-dyad will always defeat Vanilla-dyad. That's because the latter is only prosthesis for the real sexual instinct. Therefore we see the murder of Marxist nihilism on the homosexual clergy of Christianity automatically created a vacuum for the heterosexual God of Islam. Marxism nihilism accidentally created Chrislam.
Unaware of looking for a new religious endogamous core, policor suggested every effort to capture the endogamous heart of Islam. But they really thought they treated Islam the same as other religions under their multicultural exogamous mantle.
And so, as alleged multiculturalism, Islamic absolutism was imported right into the heart of Western culture. For in that era, choosing authoritarian absolutism (of Islam) was at odds with the prevailing cultural flow of total democracy and relativism.
.jpg)
And that's why multiculturalism unwittingly turned into the masochistic squirm with ass up for a gruesome and sadistic Islamic ruler.
This sadistic tyrant was absolutely needed to let our masochistic culture retrieve its counterweight. This is because two points are needed to draw a straight line.
Determinatio negatio est (Spinoza 1647). Determination is negation. In order to be determined, in order to exist as a particular entity, it is necessary to ignore the opposite. So, existence is to deny the opposite. Everything that exists in the world (masochism) requires for its existence also the existence of its opposite (sadism). The direction in space of masochism is determined by sadism as the line between two points.
But a major determinant of the emergence of Chrislam is women's emancipation in Western culture. Because it was women, who instinctively did not acknowledge sexual superiority of the homosexual clergy:
Assumption 246: In the exogamous mantle (sexuality) of Christianity, women project themselves in Jesus as personification of 'other sexual roles', which includes male homosexuality as a second God. But in nature, women have an anti-projection on the endogamous core (religion), on the first sexual God, well known as male heterosexuality. That follows SM-dyad. But in current sick religion of Christianity homosexuality plays a major role, both in the endogamous core (homosexual clergy) as in the exogamous mantle (Jesus), making Christianity fall under Vanilla-dyad. But the latter is only prosthesis on the sexual instinct and women have no instinctive relation with male homosexuality. Which means in evolution Christianity will return to SM-dyad, to Chrislam and women's emancipation will drag sadistic Allah into Europe.
The travesty of the Schengen agreement
Because the core disappeared in Western society, it dissolves in atheism and individualism. There is no group any more:
Schengen writes the necrology of European culture. This is the end stage of exogamy, complete permeability of the mammal group. Now the body will be killed by an invasion of parasites and by a flow of fortune seekers from all directions which engulf Europe, helped by the insane bombardments on Muslim states by NATO:
Once European culture has bled to death it will be overrun by Islamic hordes:
This is the end stage of exogamy, complete permeability of a mammal group:
Schengen writes the necrology of European culture.
Western culture, too long profited of Christianity and meanwhile forgot
to formulate an exogamic core more realistic than the Enlightenment. That's the
real Dutch tragedy of the last 50 years.
For Western culture, it seems the only way to regain power and to
rebuild its culture is a new endogamous core that distinguishes
between people. But that is anathema to the Enlightenment and
comes down to 'racism'. Hence, as long as the Enlightenment is the current
endogamous core this will not happen. That's the dilemma of Western
society. Because of this impasse civil war seems inevitable.
That's why Geert Wilders has to fight Islamic culture instead of Muslims. So, there is only one hypothetical wormhole through which the exogamous Western culture can escape and not to be slaughtered by the endogamous core of Islamic hatred.
But of course, this is dancing on the edge of the volcano. There only needs to be done little to address the aggression against Muslims themselves, because this difference is only artificially applied to formulate a wormhole in Enlightenment to the rescue of Western culture.
This is artificially, because a strong interaction exists between ethnicity and culture especially in selective breeding cultures.
So, Western society brought itself into real trouble and will not overcome this Gordian knot without violence.
Spartacus (Timon Dias): Christendom, Verlichting en Romantiek:
http://www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven/2015/06/gsessay_europese_identiteit.html
EU foreign policy chief to tears because of Brussels
EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini has to interrupt a press conference Tuesday in Jordan because she became sad when she talked about the attacks in Brussels.
Belgians mourn and help on social media
Many Belgians Tuesday searched social media to inform themselves and to pour out their hearts about the attacks in Brussels. Also offered help in all possible ways.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-07/eu-courts-arab-league
http://www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven/2015/06/gsessay_europese_identiteit.html
EU foreign policy chief to tears because of Brussels
EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini has to interrupt a press conference Tuesday in Jordan because she became sad when she talked about the attacks in Brussels.
Belgians mourn and help on social media
Many Belgians Tuesday searched social media to inform themselves and to pour out their hearts about the attacks in Brussels. Also offered help in all possible ways.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-07/eu-courts-arab-league
Mogherini, who participated at the Tunis summit, apparently had more pressing priorities. Prefacing her speech with words that were meant to give the expression that the EU and the Arab League are almost like two sides of the same coin, she said: "We are so geographically and culturally close, and we face so many common challenges, and we have so many opportunities to work together".
In her speech, she mentioned that Europe and the Arab League have four priorities -- none of them included the issue of human rights in the region. Nor did those priorities include the smallest reference to all the problems with which Europe is struggling -- migration from the Arab world, terrorism and extremism imported from the Arab world, which is directly affecting the physical security of Europeans. Instead, Mogherini said, "The first point, the first top issue on our respective agenda: Israel and Palestine. We need to continue to work together very closely, because we share the same sense of priority, the same sense of urgency, the same concerns and the same objectives: to get back to meaningful negotiations towards the two-state solution, which is the only viable, realistic solution".
Mogherini did, however, place great emphasis on the following, "One issue on which I believe it is crucial that Arabs and Europeans work together very closely: we need to preserve diversity in our societies. We need to prevent the rise of hate, starting with preventing Islamophobia in our societies. We need to work together to make sure that in all our countries, no one excluded in Europe as in the Arab world, everyone is accepted, protected and respected as a human being, whatever his or her background is, whatever religious belief, gender, age, identity. We value diversity and we believe that everyone needs to find his and her place in our societies. So we have a joint interest and a joint responsibility to nourish and preserve diversity and together with that the dignity of every single human being".
Perhaps, before Mogherini spoke of preserving diversity, she should have addressed the concerns expressed by the International Commission of Jurists on the human rights violations of the region and its lack of basic human freedoms and diversity of religion, speech, identity and gender. Mogherini, however, chose to keep silent.
Instead, Mogherini's words came across as references to the EU's own continued efforts to monitor and police free speech and thus, gradually, to extinguish any kind of diversity of opinion within the EU.
Exerpt from:
(295) Omvolking is the battle between subspecies of Homo sapiens
The Omvolking Theory:
(295) Omvolking is the battle between subspecies of Homo sapiens
The Omvolking Theory:
There is just one main factor responsible for Omvolking:
Husband-wife relationship (SM-dyad versus Vanilla-dyad).
SM-Dyad is a sexual instinct formed by Australopithecus.
Vanilla-dyad is a cultural entity.
This factor can be split into two sub dimensions:
1: Equivalent sexual roles (monotheism versus polytheism) and
2: the femininity factor (caused by women's suffrage).
These two sub dimensions interact strongly:
Below, we see women's suffrage after the sixties of former century first led to Vanilla-dyad (1980) as expression of equal sexual rights, but later caused sexual dissatisfaction and the unconscious yearning to SM-dyad (strong):
Then, the religious component shows the change of old Christianity (semi polytheism) into Political Correctness (polytheism), in which PC erroneously thinks that eliminating God from the central core means giving up religion:
But religion does not necessarily need a central God, a central sexual role at all (male heterosexuality) to be religion. Now PC replaced Christianity with 'all sexual roles' in the centre and the mantle. That's polytheism, atheism:
But religion does not necessarily need a central God, a central sexual role at all (male heterosexuality) to be religion. Now PC replaced Christianity with 'all sexual roles' in the centre and the mantle. That's polytheism, atheism:
This
Anyway, Omvolking (Population Transfer) is a very complicated matter and I am sure it will be better analyzed in the future:
END Excerpt.
END Excerpt.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment