About Me

My photo
I graduated and worked as a methodologist in psychology and created this blog as an unknown precursor of science. Information on this blog is nowhere else to be found.

Monday, 14 March 2016

(84) Forbidden fruit in Paradise


Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 


Number Archive






In '(9) The Convergence Theory of Paradise' we talked extensively about the paradise
story. Now we see if the new operational definition of religion fits into this narrative.

It is our opinion religion controls sexual culture:






Then we have to fill in the narrative of Adam and Eve in above operational definition.

WIKI:

Forbidden fruit is a phrase that originates from Genesis concerning Adam and Eve in Genesis 2:16–17. In the narrative, the fruit of good and evil was eaten by Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, which they had been commanded not to do by God. As a metaphor, the phrase typically refers to any indulgence or pleasure that is considered illegal or immoral. 


Identifying the fruit


(...) One alternative view is that the forbidden fruit is not a fruit at all, but a metaphorical one, possibly the fruit of the womb, i.e. sex and procreation from the tree of life.

This is all we need for our analysis

As a starting hypothesis we accept 'God forbids any indulgence or pleasure that is considered illegal or immoral'.

What can be meant other than the indulgence or pleasure from sexuality that is considered illegal or immoral? Indulgence and pleasure of food? No, fruit must be a metaphor of sexual indulgence. 'God' is the endogamous core of culture steering sexual behavior in the exogamous mantle.

But by what standards God controlled the sexual behavior of the group?

On this blog 'inbreeding and incest' has been the starting point of religion of human-like animals, the Australopiths (7mya, million years ago; 400 cc). 


1: Genetic immortality by inbreeding and incest (Homininae, 7-2 mya, 400 cc).

Genetic immortality is the first and only rational time derivative of sexual culture (inbreeding and incest). This means God commanded more inbreeding for tribal identity, but as a countermeasure less inbreeding to avoid autosomal recessive disorders:




All forms of human religion stem from inbreeding and incest as higher order time derivatives of sexual culture, of inbreeding and incest:





Eventually God converged to 40% inbreeding (tribal endogamy) and 60% outbreeding (ethnic endogamy):






The optimum ratio in the Muslim population is 40 % tribal based inbreeding, against 
60 % ethnically based outbreeding (Arabic Muslims) and is considered the holy grail of God, the wisdom taken from the tree of knowledge:







As said, 'God' forbid unlimited outbreeding on the tree of knowledge. Eve did not have sexual freedom to decide to genetic mixing with the man of her choice from another tribe (the Serpent). The Serpent was a male with other genes and he was very attractive compared to Eve's brother Adam. 

Within women the Tree of knowledge demonstrates the fight for genetic diversity:





Then the Tree of life must be the tree of inbreeding





In Christianity Eve ate from the Tree of outbreeding (the Tree of good (inbreeding)
and evil (outbreeding))Hence, the Tree of Knowledge demonstrates the mental conflict women feel between their natural desires for genetic diversity versus unnatural genetic monoculture






And in Islam Adam ate from the Tree of life (inbreeding).

Therefore in exogamous Christianity Eve ate from the Tree of Outbreeding, the Tree of Knowledge and in endogamous Islam Adam ate from the Tree of Inbreeding, the Tree of Life (what just was permitted by God!!). Many thousand years ago people must have understand better what we have forgotten.

In Islam Adam chose for the Tree of Life:


(The Quran, Surat Taha [20:120])
Sahih International

Then Satan whispered to him; he said, "O Adam, shall I direct you to the tree of eternity and possession that will not deteriorate?"




So, we see our operational definition of human religion works very well.











cc-by-nc-sa






This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment