Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Monday, 4 August 2014
(52) Space-time, wormhole to God for primitive man
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
(52) Space-time, wormhole to God for primitive man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki3rWqtAf8o
(40:41/1:22:30)
Human religion, the timelessness derivative of sexuality
Human religion started with the establishment of a genetic copy of the father in his offspring by inbreeding and incest. In this way he hoped to project his genetic formula to eternity. In fact he sought for genetic immortality. It was the only way to 'eternal' survival. We talk about the first Homininae, nine million years ago, who even could not speak with each other. Later mankind invented reincarnation, which interaction with inbreeding and incest never disappeared:
Assumption 145: Inbreeding and reincarnation into the (earthly) universe form a profitable interaction, wherein the whole is more than the parts. After the invention of reincarnation, tribal inbreeding cannot exist any longer without earthly reincarnation.
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/John-Chapter-8/
Inbreeding and incest is a function of sexuality: Inbreeding = f(sex). Hence, the first form of religion stems also from sexuality: religion = f(Inbreeding = f(sex)).The timeless survival of man started as a function of sexuality.
Assumption 146: In inbreeding and incest humans found a promising mechanism for genetic immortality of the tribe. Therefore, inbreeding refers to timelessness within human sexuality. It is a physical variable with timelessness dimension. Hence religion, or better inbreeding, stands for the time dimension within the sexual domain.
Therefore, primordial religion (genetic immortality by inbreeding) must be understood as a form of timelessness based on sexuality: genetic immortality = f(Inbreeding = f(sex)).
And therefore, religion originated as a timelessness derivative of sexuality. How can we make that clear? As follows with a somewhat contrived example:
Unlimited orgasm in the afterlife (72 virgins, 200.000 ya) can be observed as the first derivative of sexual dissatisfaction in inbred cultures (see figure below). Since this yearning for perpetual orgasm is a direct result of sexual lust suffocation and deprivation within inbreeding cultures, this first derivative must be seen as the operationalization of genetic immortality, the religious objective of inbreeding cults.
Perpetual orgasm must be understood in our time. In human evolution, genetic immortality has been sublimated first into reincarnation into the (earthly) universe and much later into the parallel universe. But, in the figure we connect perpetual orgasm directly with heaven in the parallel universe.
But yet, circular reasoning might be implemented, where we brought in a link between perpetual orgasm and reincarnation which we evaluate afterwards. But this relation is based on information from Muslims themselves and perpetual orgasm cannot exist without eternal life.
Everlasting orgasm in the afterlife (incest) and the desire for genetic immortality (inbreeding), both arising from inbreeding cultures, are two sides of the same coin.
Moreover, they are mutually reinforcing but earthly sexuality with the cousin is not always a pleasure.
Therefore, this first derivative can be understood as describing primordial religion, genetic immortality: Perpetual orgasm = f(genetic immortality = f(Inbreeding = f(sex))).
Monotheism is the most restrictive form of sexuality, based on sexual dictatorship:
The archetype of God is the physiological space of gods in the human brain, which can be developed naturally into a multidimensional space (polytheism with atheism as the asymptote), or suppressed in one-dimensional monotheism.
(40:41/1:22:30)
Human religion, the timelessness derivative of sexuality
Human religion started with the establishment of a genetic copy of the father in his offspring by inbreeding and incest. In this way he hoped to project his genetic formula to eternity. In fact he sought for genetic immortality. It was the only way to 'eternal' survival. We talk about the first Homininae, nine million years ago, who even could not speak with each other. Later mankind invented reincarnation, which interaction with inbreeding and incest never disappeared:
Assumption 10: The
inbreeding law of paradise:
The increase in inherited tribal faults enhances the
belief in reincarnation:
Rein. <=> f(C.O.I.; Coefficient of
Inbreeding).
Assumption 145: Inbreeding and reincarnation into the (earthly) universe form a profitable interaction, wherein the whole is more than the parts. After the invention of reincarnation, tribal inbreeding cannot exist any longer without earthly reincarnation.
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/John-Chapter-8/
Chapter 8
Inbreeding and incest is a function of sexuality: Inbreeding = f(sex). Hence, the first form of religion stems also from sexuality: religion = f(Inbreeding = f(sex)).The timeless survival of man started as a function of sexuality.
Assumption 146: In inbreeding and incest humans found a promising mechanism for genetic immortality of the tribe. Therefore, inbreeding refers to timelessness within human sexuality. It is a physical variable with timelessness dimension. Hence religion, or better inbreeding, stands for the time dimension within the sexual domain.
Therefore, primordial religion (genetic immortality by inbreeding) must be understood as a form of timelessness based on sexuality: genetic immortality = f(Inbreeding = f(sex)).
And therefore, religion originated as a timelessness derivative of sexuality. How can we make that clear? As follows with a somewhat contrived example:
Unlimited orgasm in the afterlife (72 virgins, 200.000 ya) can be observed as the first derivative of sexual dissatisfaction in inbred cultures (see figure below). Since this yearning for perpetual orgasm is a direct result of sexual lust suffocation and deprivation within inbreeding cultures, this first derivative must be seen as the operationalization of genetic immortality, the religious objective of inbreeding cults.
But yet, circular reasoning might be implemented, where we brought in a link between perpetual orgasm and reincarnation which we evaluate afterwards. But this relation is based on information from Muslims themselves and perpetual orgasm cannot exist without eternal life.
Everlasting orgasm in the afterlife (incest) and the desire for genetic immortality (inbreeding), both arising from inbreeding cultures, are two sides of the same coin.
Moreover, they are mutually reinforcing but earthly sexuality with the cousin is not always a pleasure.
Therefore, this first derivative can be understood as describing primordial religion, genetic immortality: Perpetual orgasm = f(genetic immortality = f(Inbreeding = f(sex))).
Assumption 149: The first derivative of sexuality is timeless sexuality, called religion or genetic immortality, operationalized as perpetual orgasm.
Assumption 150: Genetic immortality as primordial religion is the first derivative of sexuality. Of course one can argue that genetic immortality is not a form of religion but is based on sexuality, what is true. But genetic immortality has not to be proven a form of religion but the other way around: religion must prove not to be a form of sexuality.
Until then, sexuality provides the most parsimonious explanation of religious disturbances throughout the world and throughout human history.
Until then, sexuality provides the most parsimonious explanation of religious disturbances throughout the world and throughout human history.
Monotheism is the most restrictive form of sexuality, based on sexual dictatorship:
The archetype of God is the physiological space of gods in the human brain, which can be developed naturally into a multidimensional space (polytheism with atheism as the asymptote), or suppressed in one-dimensional monotheism.
Sadia Sheikh: (shot in the abdomen several times, died within three days)
|
Gülsüm Selim: (strangled with an iron cord and beaten to death with an iron bar )
Mirjam Abarkan: (stabbed into the heart)
http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2013:2900 http://www.elsevier.nl/Nederland/nieuws/2013/1/Marokkaanse-moeder-heeft-spijt-van-moord-op-dochter- 1157891W/Door Servaas van der Laan:
http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2013:2900 http://www.elsevier.nl/Nederland/nieuws/2013/1/Marokkaanse-moeder-heeft-spijt-van-moord-op-dochter- 1157891W/Door Servaas van der Laan:
http://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/2013/07/de-islam-vermoordde-mirjam#comment-334907
Annex
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
Annex
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment