.jpg)
Assumption 161: Addressing honor killings.
1: Endogamous cultures practice inbreeding and incest as an instinct since
Hominins. First inbreeding was tied to genetic immortality, but later to earthly
reincarnation, which combination is currently in force: the expectation of earthly reincarnation of tribal males reinforces inbreeding and incest.
.jpg)
2: The only way to extinguish this inbreeding instinct is by outcrossing.
Ethnic and religious endogamies are but generalizations of tribal endogamy,
because women who do not want to marry Muslims are still being ostracized or killed. This means that populations are still moving to the extremes of the SM-dyad. The inbreeding instinct only will disappear when genetic monocultures shift to genetic diversity.
Assumption 6: The SM-dyad is the building block of the relationship between husband and wife. Sadomasochism is the interaction between the killer instinct, the sexual instinct and a touch of cannibalism.
.jpg)
3. Honor killings frequently happened in previous Paradise culture. They were related to reincarnation. But in Islam earthly reincarnation is prohibited as a mortal sin. Therefore Muslims supplant the intention of their inbreeding and incest instinct. They now connect it to the “honor of the family”. But awareness of the combination of inbreeding with reincarnation and perpetual incest is the first step towards preventing honor killings.
4. Honor killings arise from the over-identification of fathers with their daughters,
regarded as possessions. It is the sublimation of the forbidden incest instinct.
They do not see them as subjects but as objects, as extensions of themselves, as ribs, so to speak. Therefore fathers develop a morbid self-projection in their daughters out in suffocating control over their behavior. It is a form of stalking.
Honor killings are promoted by an overly close relationship between fathers
and daughters at puberty. The relaxation of sick relations between fathers
and daughters in pre-puberty is a prerequisite to preventing honor killings.
5. Honor killings are to be seen as compensation for fathers forbidden physical incest, their loss of perpetual orgasm in the offspring and their loss of reincarnation by failed inbreeding. Incest and inbreeding are embroiled in a heavy interaction since Homo erectus. Her lustful killing is the final settlement with his daughter who refuses inbreeding and incest with her cousin, his nephew and deputy in incest. Through the honor killing, she pays the price for her father's disrupted eternal life projection, especially his loss of perpetual orgasm in the afterlife. Perpetual orgasm started as incest with daughters by Homininae.
6. The honor killing itself must be seen as a form of sublimated orgasm, wherein the disintegration of sadomasochism in its constituent parts gives the father more satisfaction than keeping his daughter alive in an SM-dyad. Therefore, honor killings are the price of satisfaction for fathers. The disruption of his perpetual orgasm leads to the disruption of Sexual Scales, wherein sadomasochism again decomposes in murder and sexuality:
.jpg)
This process is described with the Sexual Balance of Religion, in which SM-dyad decomposes again in blood lust and sexual desire. The inbreeding instinct is the thread through the evolution of human religion.
Assumption 66: Sadomasochism is a combination of murder and sexuality. It is unstable and easy flammable. Oppression of victims easily turns into murder, decomposing SM-dyad again into killer- and sexual instinct.
As long as one keeps bloodthirstiness and sexual desire as critical mass in focus, it goes well. But after losing control over the event, sadomasochism falls apart again in murder and sexual instinct. Then magic is lost and it explodes.
.jpg)
The key difference between Islamic culture and Christianity is that Islam cannot hold this critical mass together, time and time again is losing control, decomposing sadomasochism over and over again in murder and sexual desire. It is a vicious circle and perpetual process; it is the basic feature of Islamic culture.
Christianity succeeds much better in holding sadomasochism in synthesis. But more likely is that Islam intentionally collapses SM-dyad time and again in the interaction with Paradise culture. It is a willful interaction giving the Islamic killing machine animal power.
.jpg)
Christianity succeeds much better in holding sadomasochism in synthesis. But more likely is that Islam intentionally collapses SM-dyad time and again in the interaction with Paradise culture. It is a willful interaction giving the Islamic killing machine animal power.
7. Western psychologists should not try to improve bad relations between Muslim girls and their parents at puberty. Young women perceiving the morbid interest of fathers in their reproductive system must be taken away from home immediately. The bond between fathers and daughters must be broken by law forcefully.
.jpg)
- We have three pillars of human religion:
A: Genetic immortality by inbreeding and incest (9 mya)- Their order of appearance is prescribed by the degree of difficulty of the abstractions.
B: Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe (3 mya)
C: Reincarnation into the parallel universe (200.000 ya)
- They are developed out of each other by operant conditioning.
- Only if we can specify their interrelations, their interactions, we can theorize about the enormous human drama of Islamic culture, about the reason of honor killings and acid attacks. And we can.
- Therefore, we now develop a theory of honor killings in agreement with our postulates.
First of all, remember that without inbreeding and incest as an instinct we have no explanation for honor killings. It is a very strong but necessary assumption:
parallel reincarnation into Islamic culture. This we call cognitive dissonance in which the male inbreeding instinct expects earthly reincarnation to happen instead of parallel resurrection.
However, the interaction between both forms is very complicated and it would be unwise already to achieve in this regard a final assessment. One could postulate that earthly reincarnation is the better reinforcer in ethnic and religious endogamy, while parallel resurrection fits better in small tribes of isolated families. But this is not yet crystallized:
Furthermore, choosing a husband for his daughter in the large field of religious endogamy is sexually not interesting for the father. He is not looking for her sexual pleasure. Therefore, the attractiveness of her partner plays no role. We perceive a sexual dilemma where the selfish sexual optimum of the father lies in his perpetual orgasm in the afterlife of the tribe, against the sexual optimum for the daughter to be found in the most attractive partner in this lifetime. Hence, the father abuses his daughter to pursue his own secret and unknown sexual goals.
Another complication is that the father already married his cousin and now is very jealous of his daughter's wide range of partners within religious endogamy, which feminine instinct is not based on inbreeding but on outcrossing. That equates to the dilemma that the father should redeem his eternal orgasm in the afterlife against happiness and earthly orgasm of his daughter.
What we see is the sick self-projection of fathers in their daughters by mental incest, by monotheism forced sublimation of incest. It must be seen as a form of stalking. Fathers see their daughters as objects and are unable to distinguish between their own sexual happiness and their happiness. Sick selfishness is a cause of honor killings.
This all means that we must not mix the sexual worlds of father and daughter. The consideration of sexual advantage by earthly reincarnation (cousins) or heavenly resurrection (72 virgins, 200.000 ya) plays no role for daughters. What means that assumption 157 is not working for women.
But now we have a serious problem, because we cannot determine the interaction between earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection for women on the basis of perpetual orgasm. But we can theorize that women always want to resurrect into the parallel universe, because there inbreeding and incest are not functional any longer. Hence, for women the parallel universe is an escape from tribal suffocation. And as said, perpetual orgasm is not their motive.
And that means that Muslim men and women have completely different religious models (figure below). That they hardly find a level playing field and hardly compromise. It means that we have to build two religious models, two narrow bundles of religious vectors (arrows) from the origin, from which the combined interaction hardly can be estimated.
It concerns subspaces which will diverge optimally by discriminant analysis in Islamic culture, to find as wide angles as possible between subspaces for optimal differences. And in Christianity, two subspaces which must be canonically rotated to each other, to find optimal correlations with narrow angles between bundles, merging for optimal understanding, technically speaking.
In the figure below we see Christianity as the canonical correlation (CCA) between sexes in religion, the vertical axis is the canonical factor called Vanilla-dyad. Islam must be seen as the result of Discriminant Analysis (DA). The horizontal axis is the first discriminant factor containing sadomasochism.
.jpg)
What we see is that because human religion is a form of sexuality, synthesis between male and female religion can only be found in religions not making any sexual difference, where sexes are not equal but equivalent, where societies make no difference between subjects and objects, and make no difference between male heterosexuality and other sexual roles:
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
The essence of human religion lies in the relation between man and woman; two main human religions separate mankind on the position of women.
Assumption 15: The main law of human religion is the relationship between men and women. Therein man sees his wife as subject or as object.
Christianity seeks to connect the sexes by Vanilla-dyad, where Islam exists by cleaving basic human values as equivalence of men and women. In the animal world, females of most species select their partners in perfect sexual freedom and genetic diversity. In Islam SM-dyad is based on pure genetic monoculture, on suppression of women in paraphilia, in sadomasochism.
.jpg)
Above we corrected for differences between male and female religion and now we return to the Muslim girl selecting a partner in Western society. We consider the development of the interaction of tribal endogamies (Western Muslim families with a limited choice of marriage candidates) embedded in the religious endogamy of Western culture, where daughters have plenty of choice among Muslim males. As said, it is our belief that women do not have inbreeding but an outcrossing instinct. They don't bother about the tribe at all and certainly are not yearning for perpetual orgasm.
Note that this does not happen in exogamous cultures as Christianity, which in terms of free sexual choice created already heaven on earth.
Comparing Paradise culture with Islamic culture we see that sexual tensions were relieved by the cybernetics of the Paradise system. Inbreeding and incest were balanced. Unwilling daughters were simply killed with a smile because they had to be expelled from the group. They were killed for tribal coherence.
.jpg)
But characteristic for Islamic culture is that sexual tensions are first building on and discharge time and again as in a vomiting response in the breaking of SM-dyad in killer instinct and sexual instinct. That's the power of Allah, the power of Islam...
.jpg)
This is an animal process completely beyond control of Muslims. The power of Islamic culture lies in the contrast of previous Paradise culture, hidden in the collective unconscious, and Allah in the SUPER EGO. It is earthly reincarnation on the left side versus parallel resurrection on the right, unconscious versus conscious.
.jpg)
Only when Allah as supreme morality gives permission and Sexual Scales from the ID has ruled, tribal gods temporarily merge under pressure with Allah. Then under the uniting battle cry 'Allahu Akbar', the lustful massacre is legitimized and hunger can be satisfied. Monotheism has found the ideal method to arrange religious massacres by date. They invented the joint battle cry to control the inherent aggression of countless Bedouin tribes: Allahu Akbar.
.jpg)
At second glance on the swelling violence of Muslim fathers ending in the disintegration of SM-dyad, we understand this rage completely, because only by breaking of SM-dyad, sexual instinct and killer instinct are freed from each other. As said this means that the father now legitimizes himself first to rape his daughter and afterwards to kill her.
In preserving SM-dyad, the father adheres to the parallel universe of Islamic system:
.jpg)
But by breaking SM-dyad he reinstates the earthly universe of Paradise culture:
.jpg)
Without SM-dyad, Islamic culture cannot be understood, because only by composing and decomposing SM-dyad, the interaction with previous Paradise Culture is expressed:
.jpg)
.jpg)
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
Assumption 148: Inbreeding and incest is a human male instinct in endogamous populations. Outcrossing is a female instinct.
.jpg)
We develop a model in which honor killings are caused by the confusion of earthly and parallel reincarnation into Islamic culture. This we call cognitive dissonance in which the male inbreeding instinct expects earthly reincarnation to happen instead of parallel resurrection.
However, the interaction between both forms is very complicated and it would be unwise already to achieve in this regard a final assessment. One could postulate that earthly reincarnation is the better reinforcer in ethnic and religious endogamy, while parallel resurrection fits better in small tribes of isolated families. But this is not yet crystallized:
Assumption 157:
The balance of power between earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection is determined by the beauty of women. Smaller tribes give a smaller choice of attractive women. Hence, smaller tribes cause a greater desire for the parallel universe. What means that tribal endogamy in rural areas leads to a greater demand for the parallel universe than ethnic and religious endogamy, in which the variety of attractive women increases enormously. In religious endogamous populations, earthly reincarnation again is preferable to parallel resurrection because earthly reincarnation is the prevailing instinct. But in exogamous populations with absolute genetic diversity, yearning for eternal orgasm in the afterlife will not occur.
The balance of power between earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection is determined by the beauty of women. Smaller tribes give a smaller choice of attractive women. Hence, smaller tribes cause a greater desire for the parallel universe. What means that tribal endogamy in rural areas leads to a greater demand for the parallel universe than ethnic and religious endogamy, in which the variety of attractive women increases enormously. In religious endogamous populations, earthly reincarnation again is preferable to parallel resurrection because earthly reincarnation is the prevailing instinct. But in exogamous populations with absolute genetic diversity, yearning for eternal orgasm in the afterlife will not occur.
Another complication is that the father already married his cousin and now is very jealous of his daughter's wide range of partners within religious endogamy, which feminine instinct is not based on inbreeding but on outcrossing. That equates to the dilemma that the father should redeem his eternal orgasm in the afterlife against happiness and earthly orgasm of his daughter.
What we see is the sick self-projection of fathers in their daughters by mental incest, by monotheism forced sublimation of incest. It must be seen as a form of stalking. Fathers see their daughters as objects and are unable to distinguish between their own sexual happiness and their happiness. Sick selfishness is a cause of honor killings.
This all means that we must not mix the sexual worlds of father and daughter. The consideration of sexual advantage by earthly reincarnation (cousins) or heavenly resurrection (72 virgins, 200.000 ya) plays no role for daughters. What means that assumption 157 is not working for women.
But now we have a serious problem, because we cannot determine the interaction between earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection for women on the basis of perpetual orgasm. But we can theorize that women always want to resurrect into the parallel universe, because there inbreeding and incest are not functional any longer. Hence, for women the parallel universe is an escape from tribal suffocation. And as said, perpetual orgasm is not their motive.
And that means that Muslim men and women have completely different religious models (figure below). That they hardly find a level playing field and hardly compromise. It means that we have to build two religious models, two narrow bundles of religious vectors (arrows) from the origin, from which the combined interaction hardly can be estimated.
It concerns subspaces which will diverge optimally by discriminant analysis in Islamic culture, to find as wide angles as possible between subspaces for optimal differences. And in Christianity, two subspaces which must be canonically rotated to each other, to find optimal correlations with narrow angles between bundles, merging for optimal understanding, technically speaking.
In the figure below we see Christianity as the canonical correlation (CCA) between sexes in religion, the vertical axis is the canonical factor called Vanilla-dyad. Islam must be seen as the result of Discriminant Analysis (DA). The horizontal axis is the first discriminant factor containing sadomasochism.
What we see is that because human religion is a form of sexuality, synthesis between male and female religion can only be found in religions not making any sexual difference, where sexes are not equal but equivalent, where societies make no difference between subjects and objects, and make no difference between male heterosexuality and other sexual roles:
Assumption 87: In Islam, other sexual roles are homosexuals, women, children and animals. They are seen as objects. Finally we add ‘other religions’. Remember that Jesus is a God, as the son of God. God stands for the first sexual role of male heterosexuality, Jesus stands for the antiprojection of all other roles. Therefore Christianity is a form of polytheism.
Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:
1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles.
4: Fourth God: pedophilia.
5: Fifth God: bestiality.
.jpg)
Now it is funny that this difference between Islam and Christianity is not accomplished by statistical analysis but by nature. What we see is the state of the art as the state of nature. Main human religions are divided on the sadomasochistic dimension. It is the main human religious determinant. Sadomasochism is also the basic characteristic of monotheism.The essence of human religion lies in the relation between man and woman; two main human religions separate mankind on the position of women.
Assumption 15: The main law of human religion is the relationship between men and women. Therein man sees his wife as subject or as object.
Christianity seeks to connect the sexes by Vanilla-dyad, where Islam exists by cleaving basic human values as equivalence of men and women. In the animal world, females of most species select their partners in perfect sexual freedom and genetic diversity. In Islam SM-dyad is based on pure genetic monoculture, on suppression of women in paraphilia, in sadomasochism.
What means that young Muslim girls are looking for a candidate in the enormous area of religious endogamy. But maybe, they just prefer a non-Muslim as a partner. Hence young Muslim girls do not feel themselves in a tribal endogamous situation at all. Young Muslim girls do not experience any cognitive dissonance in reincarnation. This is an important conclusion in the conflict between Muslim girls and their fathers.
For male Muslims the problem is immensely complicated. Their inbreeding and incest instinct orders them to marry a girl from the tribe to earn perpetual orgasm in tribal afterlife. In principle their instinct orders earthly reincarnation. Hence, they marry their cousin because of this instinct. But they might become adulterous later. And if cousins are boring they pin their hopes on parallel resurrection for more attractive women slaves in heaven.
Immediate relief brings the stoning of annoying and unattractive cousins after accusation of adultery.
But there is a big difference between tribal marriage and honor killings. For young men, tribal marriage eventually can be forced by social pressure, what means that the inbreeding instinct is not quite necessary. But for the explanation of honor killings the inbreeding instinct is a must.
To understand honor killings we desperately need a conflict in the head of the father. A conflict so powerful, that it killed already millions and millions of women in history. What drive could be so powerful as to press human males to democide on such a massive scale?
.jpg)
Is that "the honor of the family"? No, of course not, we need a super strong instinct:
inbreeding and incest. And this instinct has to be satisfied with rewards, with higher order reinforcers. And the conflict must lie in the interaction of inbreeding with those distracting reinforcers: earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection.
.jpg)
.jpg)
Fortunately, the parallel universe was not known in early Paradise culture. Hence, cognitive dissonance between earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection did not occur. But honor killings certainly must have taken place. Therefore we have two kinds of honor killings in both cultures. Now, to explain honor killings in Islamic culture we take Paradise culture as baseline, as zero measurement. Of course, these murders must be inferred hypothetically. Next, contrasting both cultures provides the cause of honor killings within Islamic culture.
Here we conclude beforehand that in Paradise culture there were no psychotic conflicts in the heads of fathers. That's the baseline: no stress for the killer. We don't have facts but rely on the rational development of human religion from animal religion. There simply was no need for psychosis, because there was no parallel universe.
.jpg)
First we show the cybernetic model of the satisfying interaction of inbreeding and incest within Paradise culture. Inbreeding is of significant interest for the tribe, while incest is the reward for fathers.
The survival of tribal identity lies in the unchanged composition of the genes of the group by continuous inbreeding. And the reward for fathers is timeless incest with their daughters and granddaughters across generations. Now, inbreeding can be seen as timeless immortality of the tribe and incest as timeless orgasm for males.
But to achieve perpetual orgasm, men had to reincarnate into their own tribe, because in hostile tribes was too dangerous. Hence, we see the reciprocal pollination in which the value of inbreeding and incest is reflected. We grasp also that the cybernetic system
disintegrates when incest and inbreeding are pulled apart as happened in Islamic culture.
.jpg)
Now we contrast Paradise culture with Islamic culture:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_commandments
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest#Islamic
The Quran gives specific rules regarding incest, which prohibit a man from marrying or having sexual relationships with: his daughter.
The virginity of the daughter will be checked at marriage. If she ever had sexual intercourse before, the father could be blamed. If he really abused her, he will deny and object that she must have had intercourse with unknown persons of another tribe. Then, he possibly kills his daughter for the honor of the family. But on the other hand, well known intercourse with family members probably would not be a great problem for her cousin.
Above situation is illuminated from the sexual behavior of the father. Of course, the Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.) really matters, which is .50 between father and daughter and .0625 between cousins.
.jpg)
.jpg)
It is striking to see how Islam ruined the cybernetic system of Homo erectus by confounding earthly reincarnation with parallel resurrection. Incestuous relations between fathers and daughters were already forbidden by monotheism earlier:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_commandments
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
.jpg)
But decomposition of SM-dyad into killer instinct and sexual instinct means that steps can be taken in different order.
Our model develops two steps:
- The first is suitable for Paradise culture and consist of plain murder on the daughter, because rape by fathers was already permitted.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Tuesday, Oct 11th 2016
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3832242/Muslim-father-rapes-daughter-Norway-punishment-Westernised.html
Following Paradise culture the father feels free to rape his daughter in the first place, while he warns her for the last time for the honor killing. This would be her last chance to regress from Islamic culture to Paradise culture:
If she refuses she will be killed and nobody will ever know that she has been raped by her father. Perhaps she is pregnant and threatens him with the police. And if she agrees with the forced marriage, she will be in shock, and she will keep silent because otherwise nobody will marry her. Maybe, a large number of rapes precedes arranged marriages or honor killings of the daughter. Regression of Islamic culture leads Muslims back into the darkness of previous Paradise culture.
.jpg)
Hence, father's decision to break SM-dyad shocks the daughter and gives her the last alarming chance to choose for the Paradise Culture of inbreeding and incest, because otherwise she will pay with her life. How many daughters will have survived in this manner?
Therefore we conclude that integration of SM-dyad belongs to Islamic culture and disintegration brings the culture back to the early days of Paradise culture.
.jpg)
Within Islamic culture (SM-dyad) we see the complete collapse of the Homo erectus sexual system, frequently leading to decomposing SM-dyad:
.jpg)
The denial by Islam of the inbreeding and incest instinct resulted in a flood of blood of murdered young women.
.jpg)
.jpg)
In Islamic culture, we see perpetual orgasm in the 72 virgins of the parallel universe (200.000 ya). It is totally irrelevant to what information it relies, only is important that the desire exists.Immediate relief brings the stoning of annoying and unattractive cousins after accusation of adultery.
But there is a big difference between tribal marriage and honor killings. For young men, tribal marriage eventually can be forced by social pressure, what means that the inbreeding instinct is not quite necessary. But for the explanation of honor killings the inbreeding instinct is a must.
To understand honor killings we desperately need a conflict in the head of the father. A conflict so powerful, that it killed already millions and millions of women in history. What drive could be so powerful as to press human males to democide on such a massive scale?
Is that "the honor of the family"? No, of course not, we need a super strong instinct:
inbreeding and incest. And this instinct has to be satisfied with rewards, with higher order reinforcers. And the conflict must lie in the interaction of inbreeding with those distracting reinforcers: earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection.
Fortunately, the parallel universe was not known in early Paradise culture. Hence, cognitive dissonance between earthly reincarnation and parallel resurrection did not occur. But honor killings certainly must have taken place. Therefore we have two kinds of honor killings in both cultures. Now, to explain honor killings in Islamic culture we take Paradise culture as baseline, as zero measurement. Of course, these murders must be inferred hypothetically. Next, contrasting both cultures provides the cause of honor killings within Islamic culture.
Here we conclude beforehand that in Paradise culture there were no psychotic conflicts in the heads of fathers. That's the baseline: no stress for the killer. We don't have facts but rely on the rational development of human religion from animal religion. There simply was no need for psychosis, because there was no parallel universe.
First we show the cybernetic model of the satisfying interaction of inbreeding and incest within Paradise culture. Inbreeding is of significant interest for the tribe, while incest is the reward for fathers.
The survival of tribal identity lies in the unchanged composition of the genes of the group by continuous inbreeding. And the reward for fathers is timeless incest with their daughters and granddaughters across generations. Now, inbreeding can be seen as timeless immortality of the tribe and incest as timeless orgasm for males.
But to achieve perpetual orgasm, men had to reincarnate into their own tribe, because in hostile tribes was too dangerous. Hence, we see the reciprocal pollination in which the value of inbreeding and incest is reflected. We grasp also that the cybernetic system
disintegrates when incest and inbreeding are pulled apart as happened in Islamic culture.
Now we contrast Paradise culture with Islamic culture:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_commandments
6. Not to have sexual relations with your daughter — (Leviticus 18:10)
The virginity of the daughter will be checked at marriage. If she ever had sexual intercourse before, the father could be blamed. If he really abused her, he will deny and object that she must have had intercourse with unknown persons of another tribe. Then, he possibly kills his daughter for the honor of the family. But on the other hand, well known intercourse with family members probably would not be a great problem for her cousin.
Above situation is illuminated from the sexual behavior of the father. Of course, the Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.) really matters, which is .50 between father and daughter and .0625 between cousins.
It is striking to see how Islam ruined the cybernetic system of Homo erectus by confounding earthly reincarnation with parallel resurrection. Incestuous relations between fathers and daughters were already forbidden by monotheism earlier:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_commandments
6. Not to have sexual relations with your daughter — (Leviticus 18:10)
And perpetual orgasm in tribal afterlife was forbidden as a form of earthly reincarnation. Only eternal orgasm in the parallel universe of Allah was allowed. Islam is an extreme form of monotheism, acknowledging only one God in heaven. Remember that tribal religion means that tribal heads (Muslim males) have their own god projection in earthly reincarnation, what became a mortal sin.
We conclude that fathers in Islamic culture lost rewards for their inbreeding and incest
instinct. Incest with the daughter and perpetual orgasm in the tribe were strictly prohibited.
In short earthly reincarnation was totally prohibited. But earthly reincarnation is the
instinctive satisfaction of inbreeding and incest:
instinct. Incest with the daughter and perpetual orgasm in the tribe were strictly prohibited.
In short earthly reincarnation was totally prohibited. But earthly reincarnation is the
instinctive satisfaction of inbreeding and incest:
Assumption 144: Secondary reinforcement:
In primary religion, human inbreeding developed as an operant response followed by a reinforcing stimulus (of the expectation) of reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. Earthly reincarnation is the prevailing instinctive reward for inbreeding:
Operant response: inbreeding
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: reincarnation into the (earthly) universe.
How did Muslim fathers react on this situation? They firstly sublimated their instinctive lust for timeless orgasm across generations into mental incest, what means stalking the daughter in a suffocating way. Secondly, if their daughter refused the arranged marriage with her cousin, they compensated for their lost projection in tribal afterlife with her lustful murder as satisfactory recompense. This is the judicial death sentencing by Sexual Scales of Religion.
But decomposition of SM-dyad into killer instinct and sexual instinct means that steps can be taken in different order.
Our model develops two steps:
- The first is suitable for Paradise culture and consist of plain murder on the daughter, because rape by fathers was already permitted.
In Paradise culture, the lust for perpetual orgasm across generations was already satisfied, but the daughter was expelled by killing, because she refused inbreeding with the cousin, by which no bodies came available for reincarnation of the father.
Although the father may already have fathered children with his daughter, she still must marry with someone. Is not clear why the daughter should refuse her cousin in this situation. Honor killing in this situation was possibly infrequent. May be there are other reasons. May be she was 'adulterous' before marriage.
- The second belongs to Islamic culture where the father first rapes his daughter and then eventually kills her.
In Islamic culture, earthly reincarnation is prohibited as well as perpetual orgasm across generations. Hence, the virginity of his daughter will be checked at marriage. By breaking SM-dyad the father first cashes perpetual orgasm of Paradise Culture. Thereafter, he punishes her persistent refusal to deliver inbred bodies by lustful murder. That's what Sexual Scales of Religion really means.
The social situation between father and daughter was already deteriorated and he was sure that she would not accept an arranged marriage. To keep her virginity for someone not belonging to the tribe was nonsense. In that case he permitted himself first to rape her and then to threaten her with honor killing, in case she still did not accept her cousin.
Tuesday, Oct 11th 2016
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3832242/Muslim-father-rapes-daughter-Norway-punishment-Westernised.html
Muslim father rapes his daughter as punishment because she had become 'too Westernised' living in Norway
- The man, in his 40s has been charged with rape and incest after he attacked his daughter in their family home
- The daughter ran out of the house in the city of Fredrikstad and told a passing postman who called the police
- The daughter told police she had been punished by her father for living a Western lifestyle
Following Paradise culture the father feels free to rape his daughter in the first place, while he warns her for the last time for the honor killing. This would be her last chance to regress from Islamic culture to Paradise culture:
If she refuses she will be killed and nobody will ever know that she has been raped by her father. Perhaps she is pregnant and threatens him with the police. And if she agrees with the forced marriage, she will be in shock, and she will keep silent because otherwise nobody will marry her. Maybe, a large number of rapes precedes arranged marriages or honor killings of the daughter. Regression of Islamic culture leads Muslims back into the darkness of previous Paradise culture.
Hence, father's decision to break SM-dyad shocks the daughter and gives her the last alarming chance to choose for the Paradise Culture of inbreeding and incest, because otherwise she will pay with her life. How many daughters will have survived in this manner?
Therefore we conclude that integration of SM-dyad belongs to Islamic culture and disintegration brings the culture back to the early days of Paradise culture.
Within Islamic culture (SM-dyad) we see the complete collapse of the Homo erectus sexual system, frequently leading to decomposing SM-dyad:
The denial by Islam of the inbreeding and incest instinct resulted in a flood of blood of murdered young women.
Note that this does not happen in exogamous cultures as Christianity, which in terms of free sexual choice created already heaven on earth.
Comparing Paradise culture with Islamic culture we see that sexual tensions were relieved by the cybernetics of the Paradise system. Inbreeding and incest were balanced. Unwilling daughters were simply killed with a smile because they had to be expelled from the group. They were killed for tribal coherence.
But characteristic for Islamic culture is that sexual tensions are first building on and discharge time and again as in a vomiting response in the breaking of SM-dyad in killer instinct and sexual instinct. That's the power of Allah, the power of Islam...
In Islamic culture honor killings are the results of swelling violence, something the daughter literally may feel and see coming. And therein lies for Western society handles to intervene as early as possible:
7. Western psychologists should not try to improve bad relations between Muslim girls and their fathers at puberty. Young women perceiving the morbid interest of fathers in their reproductive system must be taken away from home immediately. The bond between fathers and daughters must be broken forcefully.
7. Western psychologists should not try to improve bad relations between Muslim girls and their fathers at puberty. Young women perceiving the morbid interest of fathers in their reproductive system must be taken away from home immediately. The bond between fathers and daughters must be broken forcefully.
Assumption 66: Sadomasochism is a combination of murder and sexuality. It is unstable and easy flammable. Suppression of victims easily turns into murder, decomposing SM-dyad again into killing and sexual instinct.
Christianity succeeds much better in holding sadomasochism in synthesis. But more likely is that Islam intentionally collapses SM-dyad time and again in the interaction with Paradise culture.
As long as one keeps bloodthirstiness and sexual desire as critical mass in focus it goes well. But after losing control over the event, sadomasochism falls apart again in murder and sexual instinct. Then magic is lost. Then it explodes.
.jpg)
The key difference between Islamic culture and Christianity is that Islam cannot hold this critical mass together, time and time again is losing control, decomposing sadomasochism over and over again in murder and sexual desire. It is a circular and perpetual process; it is the basic feature of Islamic culture.
Christianity succeeds much better in holding sadomasochism in synthesis. But more likely is that Islam intentionally collapses SM-dyad time and again in the interaction with Paradise culture.
This is an animal process completely beyond control of Muslims. The power of Islamic culture lies in the contrast of previous Paradise culture, hidden in the collective unconscious, and Allah in the SUPER EGO. It is earthly reincarnation on the left side versus parallel resurrection on the right, unconscious versus conscious.
Muslims suppress their unconscious Paradise culture because incest and inbreeding from earthly reincarnation is forbidden in Islamic culture. But they know unconsciously that SM-dyad in the collective unconscious decomposes in killer instinct and sexual instinct.
Only when Allah as supreme morality gives permission and Sexual Scales from the ID has ruled, tribal gods temporarily merge under pressure with Allah. Then under the uniting battle cry 'Allahu Akbar', the lustful massacre is legitimized and hunger can be satisfied. Monotheism has found the ideal method to arrange religious massacres by date. They invented the joint battle cry to control the inherent aggression of countless Bedouin tribes: Allahu Akbar.
At second glance on the swelling violence of Muslim fathers ending in the disintegration of SM-dyad, we understand this rage completely, because only by breaking of SM-dyad, sexual instinct and killer instinct are freed from each other. As said this means that the father now legitimizes himself first to rape his daughter and afterwards to kill her.
In preserving SM-dyad, the father adheres to the parallel universe of Islamic system:
But by breaking SM-dyad he reinstates the earthly universe of Paradise culture:
Without SM-dyad, Islamic culture cannot be understood, because only by composing and decomposing SM-dyad, the interaction with previous Paradise Culture is expressed:
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment