SexualReligion: (3) The Tragedy of God

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/

Number Archive

Friday, 8 August 2014

The start of religion

A lot of animals have a bond because they share feelings and opinions. Sometimes they become friends for life. Animals believe also in God. That is because young males, living in groups together, place a sexual ideal projection in the alpha male. They want to become as strong and mighty as him.

This process is based on a healthy relation of equality. In principle they can beat the alpha male. They are competitors on a level playing field.

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.

An important difference with other animals is that humans are speaking animals with a constant stream of thoughts, a stream of consciousness. Humans need a partner as a sounding board.

Human minds need the interaction between thesis and antithesis. Therefore the highest attainable goal in life is to form a dialectic bond, inclusive feelings, with another person. That’s what humans call 'friendship' or ‘love’. A natural dialectic basis is offered by the different minds of man and woman. That’s what we call the dialectic process D.

When dialectic partners are difficult to find, humans look for imaginary relationships within themselves. They play games by splitting their minds into parts, creating a kind of multidimensional personality. For example they split their mind into themselves and ‘God’. That’s what they call ‘religion’.

In the evolution, humans left behind their alpha male in the animal world. Only a genetic trace of ‘God’ remained in their brain, and the position of physical God became vacant.

Then society captured the throne of God and rejected selfish sexuality arising from the competition on the level playing field of males with the Alpha male as immoral. Young men were enforced to a cultural projection in which they became subordinate to their culture.

Tribes interfered with the god projection. Religion has been sublimated into esoteric occultism, what not hides its sexual background. God changed from a pure sexual standard to a cultural one. Society bent male sexuality into cultural adaptation. The god projection of boys before puberty changed into cultural assimilation, before pure testosterone would come to anarchy. This is called ‘religion’.

Assumption 181: The actual sadistic god of Islamic culture is not Allah but are tribal gods from Paradise culture. In the beginning Allah was intended as an escape from male sadism just like Christianity. This worked through Jesus in exogamous cultures, but failed due to endogamy among Muslims. Allah, the women god from the SUPER EGO and tribal gods of the ID were contaminated and clashed on the level playing field of the EGO of Muslims.

What now is seen as Allah in the Koran and Sharia is a failed women god, which has been occupied by men. Hence Islam psychologically knows a male Allah who is dominant and a female Allah who describes the inner life of women. This all because in monotheism there can be only one God. Allah must be understood as a multiple personality in Islamic culture. This is the cause of the sexual imbalance between man and wife: SM-dyad.

Hence, in most cultures males got an enforced projection far away from sexual immorality and testosterone, thereby hopefully becoming exemplary members of society. But in some cultures like Islam and its predecessor Paradise Culture, males just received a narcissistic self-projection on testosterone:

Society overpowered God. Man developed an insane subordinate homo-erotic relationship by praying with himself. This is demonstrated formidably by the change from polytheism to monotheism. It has been a change to sadomasochism, in which monotheism reduced proud polytheistic men to fearful kneeling bigots.

Where sane animals were in a competitive relation with their alpha male in polytheism, insane humans accepted a subordinate relationship with their inner self, with a hypothetical sadistic monotheistic God:

Monotheistic dictatorship succeeded in placing an invisible and unknowable God from an invisible parallel universe as Trojan horse in the brains of tribal people of Paradise Culture.

Males lost their natural proud. Because people are herd animals, the group or tribe provided them also with group identity, the cultural interpretation of sexual religion. And because the remainder of the alpha male was but a genetic trace in the human brain, tribes now replaced their symbolic founder as a ‘God’.

Hence in Paradise Culture tribal patriarchs became God and alpha male at the same time. Above all they got the power to decree killings on adulterous cousins and unwilling daughters:

Later on, monotheism carved these killings on stone tablets. Herein we see the change from polytheism to monotheistic sexual dictatorship, wherein the power of tribal heads was diminished. Paradise Culture was a society in between polytheism and monotheism:

For women nothing changed because they always have been in a subordinate relation with men or God. And God obviously is nothing more than a self-projection of men. What we see in human evolution is that the group has captured the role of alpha male and delivered subordinate males, who in turn were allowed to oppress women as a kind of payment or reward for their own slavery to the sexual dictatorship of monotheistic religion.

Now, because God is only a physical trace in the brain of man, the homosexual clergy - as a second god dimension - grabbed his role on earth:

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

~~1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]~~

2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]

3: Third God: female sexual roles.

4: Fourth God: pedophilia.

5: Fifth God: bestiality.

Because the tribe obtained the role of God, it determined also the mores of religion. It regulated and prescribed the relation of tribal members with their God. Above all, it adjudicated in the name of God and got the power to decree killings on adulterous cousins and unwilling daughters.

What have we done so far? We have operationalized human ‘religion’ as a form of sexuality in the animal world. Hence, we razed the boundaries between animal religion and human religion. Therefore, we can trace religion millions and millions of years back without needing to interview the animals:

Assumption 4:

- We give four operationalizations of animal religion:

1: Religion is a form of sexuality.
2: Religion is an expression of the group instinct.
3: Religion is the distribution key for the subordinate sex.
4: Religion sets sexual rules for the subordinate sex.